By: Stephanie Colpo, Dionne Gomez, Gina Knapik, and Joanna Scott
Jan. 31: Planned Parenthood makes announcement stating Susan G. Komen will cut funding to the organization.
Feb. 1: Susan G. Komen issues a response to Planned Parenthood’s statement.
Feb. 2: Susan G. Komen posts social media statements, but do not directly address the issue.
Feb. 3: The decision to cut funding to Planned Parenthood is reversed by Susan G. Komen.
2
“We urge everyone who has participated in this conversation across the country over the last few days to help us move past the issue.”
Feb. 7: Karen Handel, senior vice president, resigns.
Feb. 7: Susan G. Komen founder and CEO Nancy G. Brinker issues statement, taking accountability for mishandling the situation with Planned Parenthood.
Aug. 8: AP publishes story stating the president and founder of Susan G. Komen are stepping down.
3
4
Perceived key stakeholders/publics Realistic stakeholders/publics
Board of Directors Shareholders Fund Development
Committee Republicans Conservative organizations Catholic Church Conservative Leaders and
Donors Anti-abortion rights groups
Americans United for Life
Volunteers Employees/affiliates Donors or sponsors Survivors/those fighting Racers Supporters of Planned
Parenthood Supporters of the cause Healthcare advocates for
the underserved Part of a larger women’s
health care community
5
“We are dismayed and extremely disappointed that actions we have taken to strengthen our granting process have been
widely mischaracterized. It is necessary to set the record
straight.” -Susan G. Komen
"The seven California Affiliates of Susan G. Komen for the Cure are
strongly opposed to Komen National's new grant-making
policy," -Message to California's
congressional delegation. 6
Did not respond immediately
Defensive stance Showed no remorse Did not address key
audiences or truly acknowledge concerns
No real communication with key affiliates
At times, lack of communication was best Do not add fuel to the fire
“Avoiding this kind of controversy was the very reason Komen chose a quiet ending to its relationship with Planned Parenthood.”
–John Raffaelli, Susan G. Komen Board Member
What do you think of the statement? How could he have better communicated with the public?
7
8
Date Message Jan. 31, 2012
BREAKING: We’re very disappointed to announce that anti-choice groups have successfully intimidated and pressured the Susan G. Komen Foundation to end funding for lifesaving breast cancer screenings for women at Planned Parenthood health centers. Komen has been an ally and supported PP health centers to provide nearly 170,000 breast exams in the past 5 years – and we’re determined to make sure it won’t stop thousands of women from getting the care they need. Stay tuned.
Jan. 31, 2012
We’re taking steps to ensure that Planned Parenthood and the breast health programs our health centers provide remain strong and accessible to the thousands of women who rely on them every year. Women’s lives can’t afford to be caught up in political battles, and we appreciate any amount you can give.
Feb. 1, 2012
We have been overwhelmed by the outpouring of support we’ve received since yesterday’s announcement that Susan G. Komen will stop funding breast cancer screenings at PP health centers. On Facebook, Twitter & all over the Internet – your voice cannot be missed. Check out this open letter from one of our activists – and ADD YOUR NAME if you stand with Planned Parenthood and health care for all women!
Feb. 1, 2012
Are you? Share! [A photo accompanied this post – a pink square with white lettering, stating “Still standing with Planned Parenthood.”
Planned Parenthood Facebook Page
9
Date Message Feb 1, 2012
At Susan G. Komen for the Cure, the women we serve are our highest priority in everything we do. Last year, we invested $93 million in community health programs, which included 700,000 mammograms. Additionally, we began an initiative to further strengthen our grants program to be even more outcomes-driven and to allow for even greater investments in programs that directly serve women. We also implemented more stringent eligibility and performance criteria to support these strategies. While it is regrettable when changes in priorities and policies affect any of our grantees, such as a longstanding partner like Planned Parenthood, we must continue to evolve to best meet the needs of the women we serve and most fully advance our mission. It is critical to underscore that the women we serve in communities remain our priority. We are working together with Komen Affiliates to ensure there is no interruption or gaps in services for women who need breast health screenings and services. Grant making decisions are not about politics – our priority is and always will be the women we serve. Making this issue political or leveraging it for fundraising purposes would be a disservice to women.
Feb. 1, 2012
Susan G. Komen has spent 30 years providing real help to low-income, uninsured and underinsured women, and recent changes to Komen’s granting policies only reinforce our commitment. Recent reports about those policies aren’t getting it right. See the real story from SGK Founder and CEO Nancy G. Brinker in the Straight Talk video.
Susan G. Komen Facebook Page
10
Susan G. Komen began reacting to online content on Twitter at the height of the crisis. Planned Parenthood released consistent content before, during and after the disagreement with Susan G. Komen.
11
12
Media Source Title Tone Descriptive Words
Fox 16 - Online Cancer charity halts grants to Planned Parenthood
Informational Balanced
“creating a bitter rift, linked to the abortion debate”
San Francisco Chronicle
Komen affiliates blast cuts to Planned Parenthood
Critical Local
“Since the backlash against Komen”
New York Times Outcry is Fierce to Cut in Funds by Cancer Group
Confrontational Political
“with rising dissension in its own ranks and a roiling anger”
Huffington Post Susan G. Komen Loses Support After Planned Parenthood Decision
Informal Personable
“Komen has faced a massive social media backlash…with angry people”
Fox 16 – Broadcast
Cancer charity halts grants to Planned Parenthood
Positive Local
“It sounds like in the short run this is not going to hurt Planned Parenthood”
ABC News, GMA
Planned Parenthood Donations Soar After Funding Stripped by Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation
Critical Political
“Brinker has offered changing explanations for decision”
NBC Nightly News
- - - Negative Accusatory
“Komen CEO Nancy Brinker struggled to contain the damage”
13
“Her comments directly contradicted those of John D. Raffaelli, a Komen board member and Washington lobbyist, who told The New York Times on Wednesday that Komen made the changes to its grant-making process specifically to end its relationship with Planned Parenthood.”
14
Online AP story Susan G. Komen spokeswoman, Planned
Parenthood affiliates, Planned Parenthood president, anti-abortion group
Overview of the situation with different perspectives
Broadcast Local story Little Rock Susan G. Komen & Planned
Parenthood staff Greater time allocated to Susan G. Komen
spokeswoman, explanation, promotion
Print Local story California Susan G. Komen affiliates
statement, local Planned Parenthood, California senator
Attention on affiliates who were separating from the national decision
15
Conflicting reasons Grant Requirements
(direct service, stronger performance)
Statement from Nancy Brinker
Investigation Barring grants to organizations
under investigation from Leslie Aun, spokeswoman
Timeliness Emotion vs. Ration Political Argument Multiple Voices
Boards Affiliates
16
Given her political history and background, do you think Nancy G. Brinker, the former CEO,
was the best spokesperson for the crisis?
17
18
Loss of staff members and volunteers New York Times 11/8/12: “I
personally wouldn’t walk for Komen”
19% fewer volunteers Loss of financial support
$50,000 in corporate sponsorships for the Race for the Cure
Bad press continues via social media
Harris Interactive Study “Brand health” declines by
21% Second largest drop ever seen
19
20
Notable Quotes “Mutually agreed” to
decision “So non political” Not prepared for
“vicious mugging” “A bunch of schoolyard
thugs” Disappointed with
Susan G. Komen’s surrender
21
Use of personal stories to reinvigorate support
"When I learned that Komen provided breast cancer screenings and
treatment for uninsured, low-income women, I knew I had to participate in the Susan G. Komen Global Race for
the Cure even though it would be just one week after my last chemo
treatment."
“I am Susan G. Komen” Campaign
“31 Days of Impact” Blog
“Remind people that you are saving lives.” -Daniel Diermeier, author of
“Reputation Rules”
22
Do you think using “everyday” people as the voice of the organization will be an effective
communication and rebuilding strategy?
23
Bad press still exists but dialogue is slowly shifting
Key Shifts 1. Opponents change conversations 2. Susan G. Komen interacts with key
publics via social media
Anti-Komen FB Page
24
25
No immediate response Message was defensive
Listening and engaging is more important
Message was not consistent Did not truly reach their key stakeholders
and publics Failed to see power of social media
26
• Diminishment • Denied intent to harm women who benefit from Planned
Parenthood • Bolstered by talking about all the things done to help women • Minimized by stating that Planned Parenthood still receives some
grants and can apply for grants in the next year • Justified the decision by wrapping it in a principle – uphold and
advance the mission statement
• Post Reversal Strategy: Rebuilding • Addressed the political accusations • Released statement by CEO Nancy G. Brinker and the board of
directors
“It is our hope and we believe it is time for everyone involved to pause, slow down and reflect on how grants can most effectively and directly be
administered without controversies that hurt the cause of women. We urge everyone who has participated in this conversation across the country over
the past few days to help us move past this issue.”
27
28
29
• Timing of the Announcement • Not during election time
• Be ready to respond after announcement • Include a statement that addresses where funding
will go in place of Planned Parenthood to cover those services/programs
• Have a consistent message across all internal and external communication efforts
• Communicate with board members and individual affiliates and prepare them with media training.
30
• Be open and realistic about how much granted to Planned Parenthood
• Dedicated social media team • Respond to social media with approved responses
• Use third-party sources and testimonials for support
• Communicate better with Planned Parenthood • Backlash would still happen but not to same extent
31
32
1. Associated Press (2012, February 1). Cancer charity halts grants to Planned Parenthood. Fox 16. Retrieved April 27, 2013, from http://www.fox16.com/news/story/Cancer-charity-halts-grants-to-Planned-Parenthood/Q0iCrvrZk0uHg9ThBmc1Iw.cspx.
2. Cancer charity halts grants to Planned Parenthood. (2012, February 1). Broadcast. Little Rock: Fox 16. Retrieved April 27, 2013, from http://www.fox16.com/news/story/Cancer-charity-halts-grants-to-Planned-Parenthood/Q0iCrvrZk0uHg9ThBmc1Iw.cspx.
3. Colliver, V. (2012, February 3). Komen blast cuts to Planned Parenthood. San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved April 27, 2013 from http://www.sfgate.com/health/article/Komen-affiliates-blast-cuts-to-Planned-Parenthood-2976506.php.
4. Preston, J., & Harris, G. (2012, February 2). Outcry is Fierce to Cut in Funds by Cancer Group. The New York Times. Retrieved April 27, 2013 from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/03/us/komen-foundation-urged-to-restore-planned-parenthood-funds.html?_r=1&.
5. Bassett, L. (2012, February 1). Susan G. Komen Loses Support After Planned Parenthood Decision. Huffington Post. Retrieved April 27, 2013 from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/01/susan-g-komen_n_1247262.html.
6. Planned Parenthood Donations Soar After Funding Stripped by Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation (2012, Febraury 3). Broadcast. ABC News. Retrieved April 27, 2013 from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vpw9I6eAO6k.
7. Tan, T. (2012, February 2). Komen vs. Planned Parenthood: CEOs Speak Out. Broadcast. Texas Tribune. Retrieved April 27, 2013 from http://www.texastribune.org/m/story/36703/.
33
8. Benning, T. (2012, February 3, 2012). Komen apologizes for ‘recent decisions,’ pledges to continue funding Planned Parenthood. Dallas News. Retrieved April 24, 2013 from http://thescoopblog.dallasnews.com/2012/02/komen-apologizes-for-recent-de.html
9. Nolan,C., Tata, S. (2012, February 2). Susan G. Komen Pulls Planned Parenthood Funding. NBC Los Angeles. Retrieved April 24, 2013 from http://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/Susan-G-Komen-Pulls-Planned-Parenthood-Funding-138541484.html
10. Flock, E. (2012, February 2). Susan G. Komen’s funding cut to Planned Parenthood only latest in string of controversies. The Washington Post. Retrieved April 24, 2013 fromhttp://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/blogpost/post/susan-g-komens-funding-cut-to-planned-parenthood-only-latest-in-string-of-controversies/2012/02/01/gIQAeQlXhQ_blog.html
11. Scudder, V. (2012, April 11). Lessons from the Susan G. Komen Planned Parenthood Debacle. PRSA. Retrieved April 24, 2013 fromhttp://www.prsa.org/Intelligence/TheStrategist/Articles/view/9721/1047/Lessons_from_the_Susan_G_Komen_Planned_Parenthood
12. Gaudet, G Lessons from the Komen Controversy. GaggleAMP. Retrieved April 27, 2013 from https://gaggleamp.com/blog/lessons-from-the-komen-controversy/
13. Kliff, S (2012, February 3). Susan G. Komen foundation revises policy that barred Planned Parenthood funding. The Washington Post. Retrieved April 28, 2013 from http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/komen-revises-funding-policy/2012/02/03/gIQAVRa3mQ_story.html
34
14. Dziak, M (2013, January 4). Relating to Public: Susan G. Komen vs Planned Parenthood: Who handled PR better? The last Bag of Funyuns. Retrieved April 25, 2013 from http://mgdcomml.blogspot.com/2013/01/relating-to-public-susan-g-komen-vs.html?zx=e573c8ed65b07483
15. Scudder, V (2012, April 11). Lessons from the Susan G. Komen Planned Parenthood Debacle. The Public Relations Strategist. Retrieved on April 24, 2013 from http://www.prsa.org/Intelligence/TheStrategist/Articles/view/9721/1047/Lessons_from_the_Susan_G_Komen_Planned_Parenthood
16. Wallis, D (2012, November 8). Komen Foundation Struggles to Regain Wide Support. The New York Times. Retrieved on April 27, 2013 from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/09/giving/komen-foundation-works-to-regain-support-after-planned-parenthood-controversy.html?pagewanted=all&_r=1&
17. Fleming, M & O’Connor, A (2012, February 10). Tracking a Social Media Crisis: Susan G. Komen for the Cure and Planned Parenthood. Banyan Branch. Retrieved on April 30, 2013 from http://banyanbranch.com/social-blog/tracking-a-social-media-crisis-susan-g-komen-for-the-cure-and-planned-parenthood/
18. Phillips, B (2012, February 6). Even in its reversal, Susan G. Komen’s crisis PR erred. PR Daily. Retrieved on April 25, 2013 from http://www.prdaily.com/Main/Articles/Even_in_its_reversal_Susan_G_Komens_crisis_PR_erre_10751.aspx
19. Phillips, B (2011, January 25). Seven Rules to Remember When a Crisis Strikes. Mr. Media Training. Retrieved on April 25, 2013 from http://www.mrmediatraining.com/2011/01/25/seven-rules-to-remember-when-a-crisis-strikes/
35
20. Gaudet, G (2012, February 7). Lessons from the Komen Controversy. Social Media Today. Retrieved on April 25, 2013 from http://socialmediatoday.com/glenn-gaudet/441446/lessons-komen-controversy
21. Wallace, T (2012, August 9). Komen president resigning, founder shifting roles. Yahoo Finance. Retrieved on April 25, 2013 from http://finance.yahoo.com/news/komen-president-resigning-founder-shifting-roles-010547085.html
36
Top Related