Justin Cowan, Nick Yeager, Simona Isklander, and Nick Hoban
Survivor Season 1 Cast
Ways not to Communicate
BEG. SEASONMID/END SEASON
• People were being demanding/upset with each other Especially starting off
on island together• Some members not
working hard like others Older members
especially
• Tribes were eliminated People started working
alone more• Alliances were more
important to last in the game
• Some members were too blunt towards others Caused them to be
eliminated earlier than more quiet members
Productive CommunicationBEG. SEASON MID/END SEASON
• First reaching island worked together well Had to build living
space, find food/water• Team Challenges
showed teamwork Members had to work
together or would lose
Losing team votes off member
• Friendships and alliances from previous tribes overpower single players Teamwork pays off with
more power• Final episode is vote
for who they want to win Positive communication
in past pays off in end
Building TeamworkBEG. SEASON MID/END SEASON
• Teamwork was very productive Teams had to build
camp from scraps• Teamwork started all
of the alliances and friendships that lasted during game
• Teamwork started to disappear Game was based
more on individual efforts
Only lasting teamwork was alliances that were made earlier in the game
Who made themselves relevant and therefore succeed?
Season 1, it was Richard Hatch
How they made themselves relevant
Early in the game:• The Strongest
Who can win challenges for their tribe• The Providers
Who can fish, hunt, or gather Later in the game:
• The Manipulators Who make alliances, backstab, and deceive
Are any behaviors from Survivor represent on your team?
The team building is more of the positive aspects of the show but there aren’t really any of the negative aspects.
Destructive behaviors that undermined someone’s ability to
become relevant: Blatant or Subtle
Jokes: both blatant and subtle. Uses humor to distract what the person is saying.
Not hearing/overruling/not listening to people: Subtle if pretending not to hear the person. Blatant if you tell the person to shut up.
“Not the one bitchin”: Blatant. Directly tells the group that the person is being detrimental to the group.
Behaviors determining Relevance: Blatant or Subtle cont.
People overworking: Subtle. This puts others off that they think they are better than the rest of the group
Making the negatives of people pointed out for the reason they need to go home: Blatant, directly insinuating they won’t be relevant.
Alliances: Subtle, people group up to not allow others to succeed.
Voting person off: Blatant, it is part of the game, but shows the person is not a true survivor
Misleading people Utilitarianism: Misleading people is
normal if the greater good is achieved.• The ends justify the means.
Kant: Ethical stance that the way a person gets to the end decision is important and universal truths.• If everyone misleads each other it causes deceit,
chaos, and distrust.• If everyone tells the truth and works together
toward common goal it creates bond and an utopian society.
Is it more important to tell the truth bluntly or be sensitive and still truthful?
It is always better to be sensitive and still truthful rather than being blunt.
Being blunt can make people become defensive and can break the relationships in a team.
Politeness, even if criticizing, provides higher chances to get a good outcome/ solution to a problem.
Have you witnessed any of these behaviors in life?
One person of a team did someone else's part of the project to be “nice” without being asked to. The other person had nothing left to do for the project and received a C based on team rating.
In one of my classes during a team project, one team member out of 4 showed up with his own project because he did not blended into the group.
Is it always best to tell the truth and nothing but the truth even if it hurts someone?
It depends on the situation and the truth. If someone will be hurt a lie is better. If the truth is constructive criticism, than
truth is better. In our case study, as long as the truth
does not hurt you and hurts someone else is perfectly fine as long as you do not get caught, if you do you will be voted off.
Ethics versus money, or truth versus being voted off.
What did you learn from this project?
The best one does not always win. Don’t trust anyone. Watch your back. Sweet talk bring more advantages. You have to decide if money or ethics
are more important to you.
Top Related