AUSD Student Achievement AUSD Student Achievement AnalysisAnalysis
STAR 2008STAR 2008
Over-arching Goal:Over-arching Goal:
Increase achievement for all Increase achievement for all students while closing the students while closing the achievement gap in English/language achievement gap in English/language arts and mathematics between our arts and mathematics between our lowest performing subgroups— lowest performing subgroups— African Americans, Latinos, English African Americans, Latinos, English Learners, and Special Education Learners, and Special Education students— and our highest performing students— and our highest performing subgroups— Whites and Asians.subgroups— Whites and Asians.
This Report This Report Examines:Examines:
Academic Performance Index Academic Performance Index (API)(API)
Annual Yearly Progress (AYP)Annual Yearly Progress (AYP) CST highlights and issuesCST highlights and issues Areas of focus based on dataAreas of focus based on data
Academic Performance Academic Performance IndexIndex
API—API— California State measure California State measure Mostly based on CST scoresMostly based on CST scores Single composite score of Single composite score of
performanceperformance Rewards moving students upRewards moving students up Moving target– Moving target–
Base API to Growth APIBase API to Growth API
District API District API
2008 Growth
2007 Base
2007-08 Change
2007 Growth 2006 Base
2006-07 Change
AUSD 812 805 7 804 807 -3
Possibly inflated by 1-2 pointsPossibly inflated by 1-2 pointsWill be revised in NovemberWill be revised in November
Elementary School API Elementary School API Nine Schools above 800Nine Schools above 800
2008 Growth
2007 Base
2007-08 Change
2007 Growth 2006 Base
2006-07 Change
AUSD *812* 805 7 804 807 -3
Elementary
Bay Farm 934 925 9 920 930 -10
Earhart 910 917 -7 918 900 18
Edison 913 910 3 913 916 -3
Franklin 903 911 -8 917 913 4
Henry Haight 803 821 -18 821 816 5
Lum 845 818 27 817 821 -4
Otis 897 884 13 888 869 19
Paden 850 829 21 815 854 -39
Ruby Bridges 801 775 26 758 B B
Washington 774 798 -24 791 724 67
Elementary School API Elementary School API Ruby Bridges now over 800Ruby Bridges now over 800
2008 Growth
2007 Base
2007-08 Change
2007 Growth 2006 Base
2006-07 Change
AUSD *812* 805 7 804 807 -3
Elementary
Bay Farm 934 925 9 920 930 -10
Earhart 910 917 -7 918 900 18
Edison 913 910 3 913 916 -3
Franklin 903 911 -8 917 913 4
Henry Haight 803 821 -18 821 816 5
Lum 845 818 27 817 821 -4
Otis 897 884 13 888 869 19
Paden 850 829 21 815 854 -39
Ruby Bridges 801 775 26 758 B B
Washington 774 798 -24 791 724 67
Elementary School API Elementary School API Double digit growth at four sitesDouble digit growth at four sites
2008 Growth
2007 Base
2007-08 Change
2007 Growth 2006 Base
2006-07 Change
AUSD *812* 805 7 804 807 -3
Elementary
Bay Farm 934 925 9 920 930 -10
Earhart 910 917 -7 918 900 18
Edison 913 910 3 913 916 -3
Franklin 903 911 -8 917 913 4
Henry Haight 803 821 -18 821 816 5
Lum 845 818 27 817 821 -4
Otis 897 884 13 888 869 19
Paden 850 829 21 815 854 -39
Ruby Bridges 801 775 26 758 B B
Washington 774 798 -24 791 724 67
Middle School APIMiddle School API
2008
Growth2007 Base
2007-08 Change
2007 Growth
2006 Base
2006-07 Change
AUSD 812 805 7 804 807 -3
Middle Schools
Chipman 724 703 21 703 688 15
Lincoln 882 870 12 870 872 -2
Wood 762 770 -8 770 757 13
Middle School API Middle School API
2008
Growth2007 Base
2007-08 Change
2007 Growth
2006 Base
2006-07 Change
AUSD 812 805 7 804 807 -3
Middle Schools
Chipman 724 703 21 703 688 15
Lincoln 882 870 12 870 872 -2
Wood 762 770 -8 770 757 13
Chipman- two years of double digit growthChipman- two years of double digit growthLincoln- double digit growthLincoln- double digit growth
Wood- Prior year growthWood- Prior year growth
High School APIHigh School APITo be reported in NovemberTo be reported in November
2008
Growth2007 Base
2007-08 Change
2007 Growth
2006 Base
2006-07 Change
AUSD *812* 805 7 804 807 -3
High Schools
Alameda 798 798 817 -19
ACLC 853 853 852 1
Encinal 701 701 714 -13
Small Schools
ASTI 829* 829* 877* -48
ASAM Schools
Island 501* 501* 566* -65
AYP- AYP- Annual Yearly ProgressAnnual Yearly Progress Sets required targets Sets required targets Percent proficient – ELA and mathPercent proficient – ELA and math Significant subgroups must meet Significant subgroups must meet
targets targets High school proficiency based High school proficiency based
mainly on CAHSEEmainly on CAHSEE Includes participation rate and Includes participation rate and
graduation rate.graduation rate.
AYP- ELA 2008Progress toward Annual Measurable Objectives
2009 target= 45%
Gradual Consistent Increases--Strong Performance of Whites, Asians and Districtwide White
78%
Asian 74%
District 65%
English Learners Show Strong Increases
WhiteAsian
District
English Learners
+15%
…But the Achievement Gap in ELA is Growing
White 78%Asian 74%
Afr.American35%Amer. Indian33% Sp.Ed. 29%
AYP- Math 2008Progress toward Annual Measurable
Objectives
Overall Math Proficiency High
District 63%
Math— Growth from 2003-2006
District 63%
Math Data Flat 2006-08Asian
White
District
English Learners
Hispanic
African AmericanSp. Ed.
Some Groups Show Slight LossesAsian
Filipino
Sp. Ed.
AUSD Missed Annual Measureable Objective for Some Subgroups
AMO
African
American
Sp. Ed.
2009 target= 45.5%
Implications Regarding Implications Regarding Program Improvement Program Improvement (PI)(PI)
AUSD will be on the AUSD will be on the District PI District PI WatchWatch list. list.
Chipman will continue in Program Chipman will continue in Program Improvement Year 3.Improvement Year 3.
Wood School will be on the Wood School will be on the PI PI WatchWatch list based on math for list based on math for English Learners and low income English Learners and low income students. students.
A Closer Look: A Closer Look: CST ScoresCST Scores
End-of-Year test for standards End-of-Year test for standards taughttaught
Look at data by gradeLook at data by grade Helps pinpoint where to put focusHelps pinpoint where to put focus
English Language ArtsEnglish Language Arts
AUSD Students Percent Proficient, English Language Arts Content Standards, 2006-2008
-50
0
50
100
2006 % Proficient 67 60 72 63 57 61 52 59 57 47
2007 % Proficient 66 56 70 66 57 61 52 60 49 53
2008 % Proficient 66 55 74 70 60 62 60 64 51 47
2006-2008 Change -1 -5 2 7 3 1 8 5 -6 0
Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11
ELA Growth in Grades 4-9ELA Growth in Grades 4-9Over 60% proficient and improving Over 60% proficient and improving
AUSD Students Percent Proficient, English Language Arts Content Standards, 2006-2008
-50
0
50
100
2006 % Proficient 67 60 72 63 57 61 52 59 57 47
2007 % Proficient 66 56 70 66 57 61 52 60 49 53
2008 % Proficient 66 55 74 70 60 62 60 64 51 47
2006-2008 Change -1 -5 2 7 3 1 8 5 -6 0
Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11
English Language Arts Growth in Grades 4-9English Language Arts Growth in Grades 4-9Gradual but steady growth Gradual but steady growth
AUSD Students Percent Proficient, English Language Arts Content Standards, 2006-2008
-50
0
50
100
2006 % Proficient 67 60 72 63 57 61 52 59 57 47
2007 % Proficient 66 56 70 66 57 61 52 60 49 53
2008 % Proficient 66 55 74 70 60 62 60 64 51 47
2006-2008 Change -1 -5 2 7 3 1 8 5 -6 0
Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11
AUSD Students Percent Proficient,Math Standards, 2006-2008
-50
0
50
100
2006 % Proficient 71 75 73 63 53 61 45 41 33 31
2007 % Proficient 73 75 74 64 57 49 40 36 30 34
2008 % Proficient 70 77 76 70 57 52 36 33 29 32
2006-2008 Change -1 2 3 7 4 -9 -9 -8 -4 1
Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11
Proficiency Decline Steeper in MathProficiency Decline Steeper in Math
AUSD Students Percent Proficient,Math Standards, 2006-2008
-50
0
50
100
2006 % Proficient 71 75 73 63 53 61 45 41 33 31
2007 % Proficient 73 75 74 64 57 49 40 36 30 34
2008 % Proficient 70 77 76 70 57 52 36 33 29 32
2006-2008 Change -1 2 3 7 4 -9 -9 -8 -4 1
Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11
Math— Over 70% Proficient in Grades 2-5Math— Over 70% Proficient in Grades 2-5Increases in Grades 3-6Increases in Grades 3-6
AUSD Students Percent Proficient,Math Standards, 2006-2008
-50
0
50
100
2006 % Proficient 71 75 73 63 53 61 45 41 33 31
2007 % Proficient 73 75 74 64 57 49 40 36 30 34
2008 % Proficient 70 77 76 70 57 52 36 33 29 32
2006-2008 Change -1 2 3 7 4 -9 -9 -8 -4 1
Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11
Math Decline Sharp in Grades 6-11Math Decline Sharp in Grades 6-11Proficiency Down in Grades 7-10Proficiency Down in Grades 7-10
Looking DeeperLooking Deeper
Math proficiency in grades 6-11Math proficiency in grades 6-11 Math achievement by subgroupMath achievement by subgroup
Math Achievement by Subgroup, Grades 6-Math Achievement by Subgroup, Grades 6-1111
AUSD Students Percent Proficient, Math Content Standards, 2008
Achievement Gap by Grade
0
20
40
60
80
Afr. Amer./Black % Proficient 22 15 8 10 12 14
Hispanic-Latino % Proficient 31 24 19 18 9 6
Asian % Proficient 72 71 50 48 40 47
All Students % Proficient 57 52 36 33 29 32
Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11
Math Achievement by Subgroup, Grades 6-Math Achievement by Subgroup, Grades 6-1111
AUSD Students Percent Proficient, Math Content Standards, 2008
Achievement Gap by Grade
0
20
40
60
80
Afr. Amer./Black % Proficient 22 15 8 10 12 14
Hispanic-Latino % Proficient 31 24 19 18 9 6
Asian % Proficient 72 71 50 48 40 47
All Students % Proficient 57 52 36 33 29 32
Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11
African American StudentsAfrican American Students
Math Achievement by Subgroup, Grades 6-Math Achievement by Subgroup, Grades 6-1111
AUSD Students Percent Proficient, Math Content Standards, 2008
Achievement Gap by Grade
0
20
40
60
80
Afr. Amer./Black % Proficient 22 15 8 10 12 14
Hispanic-Latino % Proficient 31 24 19 18 9 6
Asian % Proficient 72 71 50 48 40 47
All Students % Proficient 57 52 36 33 29 32
Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11
Hispanic- Latino StudentsHispanic- Latino Students
Math Achievement by Subgroup, Grades 6-Math Achievement by Subgroup, Grades 6-1111
AUSD Students Percent Proficient, Math Content Standards, 2008
Achievement Gap by Grade
0
20
40
60
80
Afr. Amer./Black % Proficient 22 15 8 10 12 14
Hispanic-Latino % Proficient 31 24 19 18 9 6
Asian % Proficient 72 71 50 48 40 47
All Students % Proficient 57 52 36 33 29 32
Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11
Asian Students- The highest performing Asian Students- The highest performing group group
What the Data Doesn’t What the Data Doesn’t ShowShow
More students are taking higher level More students are taking higher level math classes. math classes.
Last year, Last year, 40%40% of all 7 of all 7thth grade students grade students took Algebra. In 06-07, took Algebra. In 06-07, 31%31% took took Algebra. Algebra.
African American and Latino students are African American and Latino students are under-represented in higher level math under-represented in higher level math classes.classes.
Math proficiency in grade-level and Math proficiency in grade-level and advanced classes is dropping.advanced classes is dropping.
Moving beyond the Moving beyond the datadata
Hold a Math Summit in the fall that includes Hold a Math Summit in the fall that includes math teachers, administrators, and support math teachers, administrators, and support providers.providers.
Incorporate SIM and other instructional Incorporate SIM and other instructional strategies into math professional strategies into math professional development.development.
Continue professional development that Continue professional development that supports math content knowledge.supports math content knowledge.
Last spring, tightened requirements for 7Last spring, tightened requirements for 7thth grade Algebra.grade Algebra.
In additionIn addition
Adopt math intervention Adopt math intervention materials.materials.
Adopt new math textbooks that Adopt new math textbooks that allow for integrating appropriate allow for integrating appropriate instructional strategies.instructional strategies.
Further tighten placement of Further tighten placement of students into 7students into 7thth grade algebra. grade algebra.
In Review— In Review—
Overall, achievement in ELA is up.Overall, achievement in ELA is up. Achievement in math is up in some grades, Achievement in math is up in some grades,
and high overall in elementary grades.and high overall in elementary grades. The achievement gap for African American The achievement gap for African American
and Latino students is extreme in math in and Latino students is extreme in math in grades 7-11.grades 7-11.
We have increased the number of students We have increased the number of students taking challenging math classes, but with taking challenging math classes, but with some loss of proficiency.some loss of proficiency.
We have a plan to address the problems We have a plan to address the problems that surfaced in the data.that surfaced in the data.
Top Related