Rock EngineeringRock EngineeringPractice & DesignPractice & Design
Lecture 6: Lecture 6: Limit EquilibriumLimit Equilibrium
1 of 38 Erik Eberhardt – UBC Geological Engineering ISRM Edition
Author’s Note:Author’s Note:The lecture slides provided here are taken from the course “Geotechnical Engineering Practice”, which is part of the 4th year Geological Engineering program at the University of British Columbia (V C d ) Th k i i d (Vancouver, Canada). The course covers rock engineering and geotechnical design methodologies, building on those already taken by the students covering Introductory Rock Mechanics and Advanced Rock Mechanics Rock Mechanics.
Although the slides have been modified in part to add context, they of course are missing the detailed narrative that accompanies any l l d h h l lecture. It is also recognized that these lectures summarize, reproduce and build on the work of others for which gratitude is extended. Where possible, efforts have been made to acknowledge th v ri us s urc s ith list f r f r nc s b in pr vid d t th the various sources, with a list of references being provided at the end of each lecture.
Errors, omissions, comments, etc., can be forwarded to the
2 of 38 Erik Eberhardt – UBC Geological Engineering ISRM Edition
Errors, omissions, comments, etc., can be forwarded to the author at: [email protected]
Analysis in Geotechnical EngineeringAnalysis in Geotechnical Engineering
(infinite slope, method of slices etc )
LIMIT EQUILIBRIUM
method of slices, etc.)
DISCONTINUUM(distinct element etc )
CONTINUUM(finite element, finite difference, etc.)
(distinct element, etc.)
3 of 38 Erik Eberhardt – UBC Geological Engineering ISRM Edition
Limit Equilibrium AnalysisLimit Equilibrium AnalysisTh t id l li d l ti l t h i d i t h i l l i The most widely applied analytical technique used in geotechnical analysis is that of limit equilibrium, whereby force or/and moment equilibrium conditions are examined on the basis of statics. These analyses require information about material strength, but not stress-strain behaviour.g ,
The typical output from a limit equilibrium analysis is the “Factor of Safety”:
FS = resisting forcesdriving forcesdriving forces
DRIVING force
= shear strengthshear stress RESISTING force
FS > 1.0 represents a stable situationFS < 1.0 denotes failure
forceshear stress RESISTING force (i.e.shear strength)
4 of 38 Erik Eberhardt – UBC Geological Engineering ISRM Edition
Limit Equilibrium AnalysisLimit Equilibrium Analysis
Although limit equilibrium can be applied to many geotechnical problems, it has been most widely used within the context of slope stability analysis. The analysis of slope stability may be p y y y p y yimplemented at two distinct stages:
Pre-failure analysis – applied to assess safety in a global r fa ur ana ys s app to ass ss saf ty n a g o a sense to ensure that the slope will perform as intended;
Post-failure analysis – also termed back-analysis, should be y yresponsive to the totality of processes which led to failure.
As such analyses are undertaken to provide either a factor of As such, analyses are undertaken to provide either a factor of safety, identify a potential failure surface, or through back-analysis, a range of shear strength parameters at failure.
5 of 38 Erik Eberhardt – UBC Geological Engineering ISRM Edition
Analysis in Geotechnical DesignAnalysis in Geotechnical Design
The fundamental requirement for a meaningful analysis should include the following steps of data collection & g pevaluation:
– site characterization (geological di i )conditions);
– groundwater conditions (pore pressure distribution);– geotechnical parameters (strength, deformability, permeability);– primary stability mechanisms (k l f l )
… ideal order of events for a site investigation (Clayton et al., 1995).
(kinematics, potential failure modes).investigation (Clayton et al., 995).
6 of 38 Erik Eberhardt – UBC Geological Engineering ISRM Edition
Analysis in Geotechnical DesignAnalysis in Geotechnical DesignG t h i l l i l l t ! Oft fi ld d t i d Geotechnical analyses involve complex systems! Often, field data required for model input (e.g. in situ stresses, material properties, geological structure, etc.) are not available or can never be known completely/exactly. This creates uncertainty, preventing the models from p y y y, p gbeing used to provide design data (e.g. expected displacements).
Such models, however, may prove useful in providing a picture of the mechanisms acting in a particular system. In this role, the model may be g p y yused to aid intuition/judgement providing a series of cause-and-effectexamples.
complicated geology simple geologySituation
complicated geology inaccessible no testing budget
simple geology $$$ spent on site
investigation
Data none
investigation off il h i ( )
complete (?)
predictive(d i )
Approach
7 of 38 Erik Eberhardt – UBC Geological Engineering ISRM Edition
failure mechanism(s) (design use)
Limit Equilibrium Limit Equilibrium –– Translational SlidingTranslational SlidingHudson & Harrison (1997)
The solution for translational sliding requires that the strikes of the
Hudson & Harrison (1997)
sliding plane and slope are parallel and that no end restraints are present. Furthermore the solution Furthermore, the solution incorporates the assumptions that the rock mass isimpermeable, the sliding bl k i i id th t th block is rigid, the strength of the slide plane is given by the Mohr-Coulomb shear criterion and that all forces fpass through the centroid of the sliding block.
8 of 38 Erik Eberhardt – UBC Geological Engineering ISRM Edition
Limit Equilibrium Limit Equilibrium –– Translational SlidingTranslational Sliding
Hoek & Bray (1981)
9 of 38 Erik Eberhardt – UBC Geological Engineering ISRM Edition
Effective StressEffective StressHi h d l ff t th t bilit f l High pore pressures may adversely affect the stability of a slope due to a decrease in effective stresses.
n
W W
Factor = W sin
n’
n f of Safety
Total Normal Stress, n
Pore EffectivePore Pressure
EffectiveStress
’This intergranular stress, or effective stress, may be viewed as the sum of the contact forces di id d b h l
10 of 38 Erik Eberhardt – UBC Geological Engineering ISRM Edition
divided by the total area.
Effective StressEffective StressTotal Normal Stress, n
However the total normal stress and
The effective stress cannot be measured; it can only be calculated.constant =
Pore Pressure
EffectiveStress
’
However, the total normal stress and pore pressure can be calculated based on the overburden weight and location of the groundwater table.
’ =n -
W
[n – ]constant
f n
As precipitation infiltrates the ground, the total normal stress remains relatively unchanged but the pore pressure increases decreasing the effective normal stress
11 of 38 Erik Eberhardt – UBC Geological Engineering ISRM Edition
unchanged but the pore pressure increases decreasing the effective normal stress acting on the sliding surface (thereby decreasing the frictional strength component).
Planar Analysis Planar Analysis –– Water Pressure Scenarios Water Pressure Scenarios Wyllie & Mah (2004)Wyllie & Mah (2004)
free draining toe
Drainage blocked at toe (uniform pressure on slide plane)
Water table below tension crack (triangular pressure on slide plane)
12 of 38 Erik Eberhardt – UBC Geological Engineering ISRM Edition
Limit Equilibrium Limit Equilibrium –– Sensitivity AnalysisSensitivity Analysis
… calculation of factor of safety vs. different depths of water in the tension crack, and vs. horizontal acceleration
13 of 38 Erik Eberhardt – UBC Geological Engineering ISRM Edition
acceleration.
Rock Slope Engineering Rock Slope Engineering –– Bench Bench vsvs Pit Wall FailuresPit Wall Failures
A function of scale and joint persistence.
Wyllie & Mah (2004)
14 of 38 Erik Eberhardt – UBC Geological Engineering ISRM Edition
Rotational Slip SurfacesRotational Slip SurfacesIn weak materials such as highly weathered or closely fractured rock and In weak materials such as highly weathered or closely fractured rock, and rock fills and soils, a strongly defined structural pattern no longer exists, and the shear failure surface develops along the line of least resistance. These slip surfaces generally take a circular shape.
15 of 38 Erik Eberhardt – UBC Geological Engineering ISRM Edition
Limit Equilibrium Limit Equilibrium –– Rotational SlidingRotational SlidingThe fundamental concepts of the limit equilibrium method as applied to rotational/circular slip surfaces are:
slip mechanism results in slope failure;… slip mechanism results in slope failure;
… resisting forces required to equilibrate disturbing mechanisms are found from static
lsolution;
… the shear resistance required for equilibrium is compared with available shear
shallow failureq p
strength in terms of the Factor of Safety;
… the mechanism corresponding to the lowest FS is found by iteration;
deep-seated failure
lowest FS is found by iteration;
… the Factor of Safety is assumed to be constant along the entire slip surface
16 of 38 Erik Eberhardt – UBC Geological Engineering ISRM Edition
Morgenstern (1995)
Limit Equilibrium Limit Equilibrium –– Method of SlicesMethod of SlicesThe most commonly used solutions divide the mass above an assumed slip surface into vertical slices. This is to accommodate conditions where the soil accommodate conditions where the soil properties and pore pressures vary with location throughout the slope.
The forces acting on a typical slice, i, are:
W = weight of slicec, = mobilized shear forces at base of slice‘·l = effective normal forces on baseu·l = water pressure force on baseE = side forces exerted by neighboring slices.
ncan
(199
6)
17 of 38 Erik Eberhardt – UBC Geological Engineering ISRM Edition
Dun
Method of Slices Method of Slices –– Equations & UnknownsEquations & Unknownsl h Analysing the summation
of forces and/or moments for these slices (i.e. M=0, Fx=0, Fy=0), it M 0, Fx 0, Fy 0), it is soon recognized that there are more unknownsthan equations.
ad (1
992)
As such, the forces involved are statically indeterminate. Various
Brom
hea
methods have therefore been developed to make up the balance between the number of equilibrium number of equilibrium equations and the number of unknowns in the problem. an
(199
6)
18 of 38 Erik Eberhardt – UBC Geological Engineering ISRM Edition
Dun
ca
Method of Slices Method of Slices -- AssumptionsAssumptions
can
(199
6)
The various Method of Slices procedures either make assumptions to make the problem determinate (balancing knowns and unknowns), or they do not satisfy all
Dun
19 of 38 Erik Eberhardt – UBC Geological Engineering ISRM Edition
p ( g ), y ythe conditions of equilibrium.
Method of Slices Method of Slices -- AssumptionsAssumptions
The treatment of side forces, is one of the key assumptions that differentiate several of th i M th d f Sli the various Method of Slices procedures.
20 of 38 Erik Eberhardt – UBC Geological Engineering ISRM Edition
Method of Slices Method of Slices -- AssumptionsAssumptions
7
Because different methods use different assumptions to make up the balance between equations and unknowns (to render the problem determinate), some methods do not satisfy all
21 of 38 Erik Eberhardt – UBC Geological Engineering ISRM Edition
determinate), some methods do not satisfy all conditions of equilibrium (i.e. force and/or moment).
Ordinary Method Ordinary Method -- ComputationComputation
Th “ di th d” l The “ordinary method” only resolves the forces acting at the base of the slice. This allows for the side forces to b l t d d f th be neglected and for the problem to be easily solved.
22 of 38 Erik Eberhardt – UBC Geological Engineering ISRM Edition
Bishop’s Modified Method Bishop’s Modified Method -- ComputationComputation
The “Bishop’s Modified Method” includes interslice side forces interslice side forces, but requires an iterative procedure to determine the Factor of Safety of Safety.
Duncan (1996)
23 of 38 Erik Eberhardt – UBC Geological Engineering ISRM Edition
Bishop’s Modified Method Bishop’s Modified Method -- ComputationComputation
1.43 1.51 1.52
1 51 1 521 521.51 1.521.52
Duncan (1996)
24 of 38 Erik Eberhardt – UBC Geological Engineering ISRM Edition
Duncan (1996)
General Limit EquilibriumGeneral Limit Equilibrium
1. Different methods use different assumptions to make up the balance between equations and unknowns to render the problem determinate; orrender the problem determinate; or
2. Some methods, such as the ordinary and Bishop’s modified methods, do not satisfy all conditions of equilibrium satisfy all conditions of equilibrium (i.e. force and/or moment).
The degree to which the force polygon closes i di t h th f ilib i i hi d
General Limit Equilibrium (GLE): Method that encompasses key elements of several Method of Slice solutions calculating one Safety Factor based on
indicates whether force equilibrium is achieved.
several Method of Slice solutions, calculating one Safety Factor based on moment equilibrium and one based on horizontal force equilibrium. The method also allows for a range of interslice shear-normal force conditions, making it the most rigorous of all the methods, satisfying both force and
t ilib i f i l d i l li f
25 of 38 Erik Eberhardt – UBC Geological Engineering ISRM Edition
moment equilibrium, for circular and non-circular slip surfaces. Krahn (2003)
ComputerComputer--Aided Limit Equilibrium AnalysisAided Limit Equilibrium AnalysisI h th h f il f i t k it ti i t d In cases where the shear failure surface is not known, its anticipated location can be found from analysis of the whole range of possible surfaces, and taking the actual surface to be that which gives the lowest factor of safety. This procedure can be quickly carried out using y p q y gcomputer-based slip surface search routines.
Hand or spreadsheet calculations can take hours to solve for a can take hours to solve for a single slip surface, whereas a computer requires only seconds to solve for hundreds of potential
26 of 38 Erik Eberhardt – UBC Geological Engineering ISRM Edition
slip surfaces.
Critical Slip Surface Search Critical Slip Surface Search
27 of 38 Erik Eberhardt – UBC Geological Engineering ISRM Edition
(Rocscience – Slide)
Analysis of NonAnalysis of Non--Circular Slip SurfaceCircular Slip Surface
(Rocscience – Slide)
For a non-circular slip surface, a block search routine is used that analyzes a limited number of slip surfaces relating to the division of the slide mass into an active central and passive slide block
28 of 38 Erik Eberhardt – UBC Geological Engineering ISRM Edition
the slide mass into an active, central and passive slide block.
Advanced Limit Equilibrium Analysis Advanced Limit Equilibrium Analysis -- 3D3D
Most limit equilibrium formulations are two-dimensional even though dimensional even though actual slope failures are three-dimensional. However, there are a However, there are a few 3-D limit equilibrium programs employing a “method of columns” approach.
The 3-D analysis program
Hungr et al. (1989)
CLARA divides the sliding mass into columns, rather than slices as used in the 2-D analysis mode
29 of 38 Erik Eberhardt – UBC Geological Engineering ISRM Edition
mode.
Limit Equilibrium Analysis Limit Equilibrium Analysis -- LimitationsLimitations
1 Th l f d l b h
Although limit equilibrium methods are very useful in slope analysis, they do have their limitations and weaknesses:
1. The implicit assumptions of ductile stress-strain behaviour for the material (stress-strain relationships are neglected);
2. Most problems are statically indeterminate;
3. The factor of safety is assumed to be constant along the slip surface (an oversimplification, especially if the failure surface passes through different materials);
4. Computational accuracy may vary;
5. Allow only basic loading conditions (do not incorporate in situ stresses);)
6. Provide little insight into slope failure mechanisms (do not consider stress state evolution or progressive failure).
30 of 38 Erik Eberhardt – UBC Geological Engineering ISRM Edition
UncertaintyUncertaintyG t h i l i t d l ith t l diti th t l l Geotechnical engineers must deal with natural conditions that are largely unknown and must be inferred from limited and costly observations. The principal uncertainties have to do with the accuracy and completeness with which subsurface conditions are known and with the resistances that the
The uncertainties in geotechnical
fmaterials will be able to mobilize (e.g. strength).
The uncertainties in geotechnical engineering are largely inductive: starting from limited observations, judgment, knowledge of geology, and statistical reasoning are employed to infer the reasoning are employed to infer the behavior of a poorly-defined universe.
In contrast, The uncertainties in structural and mechanical engineering are largely deductive: starting from largely deductive: starting from reasonably well known conditions, models are employed to deduce the behavior of a reasonably well-specified universe.
31 of 38 Erik Eberhardt – UBC Geological Engineering ISRM Edition
Sensitivity AnalysisSensitivity AnalysisS iti it l ll f th d t i ti f th " iti it " f Sensitivity analyses allow for the determination of the "sensitivity" of the safety factor to variation in the input data variables. This is done by varying one variable at a time, while keeping all other variables constant, and plotting a graph of safety factor versus the variable.constant, and plott ng a graph of safety factor versus the var able.
32 of 38 Erik Eberhardt – UBC Geological Engineering ISRM Edition
Probability AnalysisProbability AnalysisProbabilistic analyses consider the variability of input parameters and Probabilistic analyses consider the variability of input parameters, and provide the probability of failure based on a given probability distribution function (defined through a known mean and standard deviations).
Probability distribution: A probability density function (PDF) describes the relative likelihood that a random variable will assume a particular value. The area
X
p
under the PDF is always unity.
The normal distribution is the most t f PDF It i d f t
2.5%
common type of PDF. It is used for most probabilistic studies, although for some parameters, a different distribution may be more applicable (e.g. joint spacing).
A small standard deviation indicates a tightly clustered data set while a large standard deviation indicates a large scatter about the mean. For a normal distribution, 68% of the test values will fall within an interval defined by the mean
33 of 38 Erik Eberhardt – UBC Geological Engineering ISRM Edition
, y± one standard deviation while 95% will fall within two standard deviations.
Probability Distribution Functions Probability Distribution Functions dd h l d l d b h b In addition to the commonly used normal distribution there are a number
of alternative distributions which are used in probability analyses. Some of the most useful are:
34 of 38 Erik Eberhardt – UBC Geological Engineering ISRM Edition
Probabilistic Analysis Probabilistic Analysis –– Monte Carlo Sampling Monte Carlo Sampling h l h d d d d b l The Monte Carlo method uses random or pseudo-random numbers to sample
from the probability distributions and, if sufficiently large numbers of samples are generated and used in a calculation such as that for a factor of safety a distribution of values for the end product will be generated.of safety, a distribution of values for the end product will be generated.
… Monte Carlo sampling (relative frequency) of cohesion taken as a frequency) of cohesion taken as a random variable – 1000 samples, with those producing a factor of safety <1 highlighted in red.
35 of 38 Erik Eberhardt – UBC Geological Engineering ISRM Edition
Probability of Failure Probability of Failure Remember that the PF and RI
calculated for the Overall Slope, are not associated with a specific slip surface, but
include the safety factors of all global minimum slip surfaces from the Probabilistic Analysis.
The Probability of Failure is simply equal to the number of analyses with safety factor less than 1, divided by the total Number of Samples.
The Reliability Index is an indication of the number of standard deviations which separate the Mean Safety Factor from th iti l f t f t ( F 1)
36 of 38 Erik Eberhardt – UBC Geological Engineering ISRM Edition
the critical safety factor ( F = 1).
ComputerComputer--Aided Probabilistic AnalysisAided Probabilistic AnalysisEberhardt & Stead (2006)
Sensitivity analysis of earthquake loading, followed by probabilistic analysis to account for parameter uncertainty.
FEM groundwater analysis to calculate pore pressures to be used in a stability analysis of a
37 of 38 Erik Eberhardt – UBC Geological Engineering ISRM Edition
used in a stability analysis of a rockslide dam.
Lecture ReferencesLecture ReferencesBromhead EM (1992) The Stability of Slopes (2nd Edition) Blackie Academic & Professional:Bromhead, EM (1992). The Stability of Slopes (2nd Edition). Blackie Academic & Professional:London.
Clayton, CRI, Simons, NE & Matthews, MC (1982). Site Investigation: A Handbook for Engineers.Halsted Press: New York.
Duncan, JM (1996). Soil slope stability analysis. In Landslides: Investigation and Mitigation – SpecialReport 247. National Academy Press: Washington, D.C., pp. 337-371.
Eberhardt, E & Stead, D (2004). Incorporating the effects of groundwater and coupledhydromechanical processes in slope stability analysis. Italian Journal of Engineering Geology andy m p p y y f g g gyEnvironment, Special Issue 1: 139-143.
Hoek, E & Bray, JW (1981). Rock Slope Engineering (3rd edition). Institution of Mining andMetallurgy: London.
H d JA & H i JP (1997) E i i R k M h i A I t d ti t th P i i lHudson, JA & Harrison, JP (1997). Engineering Rock Mechanics – An Introduction to the Principles .Elsevier Science: Oxford.
Hungr, O, Salgado, FM & Byrne, PM (1989). Evaluation of a three-dimensional method of slopestability analysis. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 26(4): 679-686.
Krahn, J (2003). The 2001 R.M. Hardy Lecture: The limits of limit equilibrium analyses. CanadianGeotechnical Journal 40: 643-660.
Morgenstern, NR (1995). The role of analysis in the evaluation of slope stability. In Proceedings,Sixth International Symposium on Landslides Christchurch A A Balkema: Rotterdam pp 1615-1629
38 of 38 Erik Eberhardt – UBC Geological Engineering ISRM Edition
Sixth International Symposium on Landslides, Christchurch. A.A. Balkema: Rotterdam, pp. 1615 1629.
Wyllie, DC & Mah, CW (2004). Rock Slope Engineering (4th edition). Spon Press: London.
Top Related