1Program and Project design
Results-based public management
tools for the design and implementation of public rural
development programs with a project cycle approach
Implementation and
Monitoring
DiagnosisEvaluation
DesignmodULe 2
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
2
iProgram and Project design
Food and agRicultuRe oRganiz ation oF the united nations
S a n t i a g o , 2 0 1 4
Implementation and
Monitoring
DiagnosisEvaluation
Results-based public management
tools for the design and implementation of public rural
development programs with a project cycle approach
DesignmodULe 2
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
ii
the designations employed and the presentation of material in this information
product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the
food and agriculture organization of the United nations (fao) concerning the legal
or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or
concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. the mention of specific
companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented,
does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by fao in preference
to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.
the views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not
necessarily reflect the views or policies of fao.
isbn 978-92-5-108467-0 (print)
e-isbn 978-92-5-108468-7 (Pdf)
© fao, 2014
fao encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information
product. except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and
printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial
products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of fao as the source
and copyright holder is given and that fao’s endorsement of users’ views, products or
services is not implied in any way.
all requests for translation and adaptation rights, and for resale and other commercial
use rights should be made via www.fao.org/contact-us/licence-request or addressed to
fao information products are available on the fao website (www.fao.org/publications)
and can be purchased through [email protected].
iiiProgram and Project design
aknowledgements ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- vii
Presentation ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ix
introduction ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- xi
I. Program and project design -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1
C h a p t e r 1 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2
Methodology for program and project design ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2
1.1 objectives analysis --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4
1.2 alternatives analysis ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7
1.3 Performance indicators --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------11
1.4 means of verification ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------14
1.5 risks and assumptions ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------17
1.6 counterfactual data ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 20
II. Case Study -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 23
C h a p t e r 2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 24
Example of program design ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 24
2.1 analysis of objectives for the design of a program for sustainable use of natural resources
in the rural and fishing sector ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 24
2.2 development of indicators of the budgetary programs in mexico ----------------------------------------- 40
2.3 baseline study of sagarPa Programs ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 43
III. Tools -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------51
Questionnaire for the baseline of the rural and fishing sector programs --------------------------------------------52
contents
iii
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
iv
IV. Annexes ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 103
Annex 1 sampling framework for the baseline study of the 2008 sagarPa Programs ------------------------104
Annex 2 sample size by stratum by state -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 105
Annex 3 sample size by state for non-stratified listed population ---------------------------------------------------106
Annex 4 sample size by state for non-listed population--------------------------------------------------------------- 107
f I g u R E S
Figure 1. Project life cycle: design -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2
Figure 2. objectives tree -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4
Figure 3. vertical logic of a program or project ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5
Figure 4. identification of alternatives (1) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 7
Figure 5. identification of alternatives (2) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 8
Figure 6. from the analysis of alternatives to the logical framework ---------------------------------------------------10
Figure 7. Logical framework: indicators -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------13
Figure 8. horizontal logic of the program or project ----------------------------------------------------------------------15
Figure 9. Logical framework: means of verification -----------------------------------------------------------------------16
Figure 10. relationship between risks/assumptions and objectives-----------------------------------------------------17
Figure 11. flow chart for the verification of risks and assumptions -----------------------------------------------------18
Figure 12. Logical framework: risks/assumptions -------------------------------------------------------------------------19
Figure 13. Problem tree of the degradation of natural resources in the rural and fishing sector ----------------- 24
Figure 14. objectives tree for the design of a program on sustainable use of natural resources in the rural and fishing sector of mexico ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 25
Figure 15. Purpose and outputs in the rural and fishing sector -------------------------------------------------------- 26
Figure 16. general activities for each output ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 27
Figure 17. alternatives tree----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 37
iv
vProgram and Project design
TA b l E S
TAble 1. evaluation of alternatives matrix ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9
TAble 2. weighting for the selection of indicators ------------------------------------------------------------------------12
TAble 3. means of verification by indicator --------------------------------------------------------------------------------14
TAble 4. identification of risks and assumptions -------------------------------------------------------------------------18
TAble 5. Performance indicator reference sheet of the imr of sagarPa’s Program to support investment in equipment and infrastructure -------------------------------------------------------------------41
TAble 6. Potential population and target population -------------------------------------------------------------------- 43
TAble 7. strata in which the target population was classified --------------------------------------------------------- 44
TAble 8. Questionnaire structure for conducting the baseline study of the sagarPa Programs -------------- 48
v
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
vivi
A C R o n y M S
fAo food and agriculture organization
fW fall-winter
IMR indicators matrix for results
lfM Logical framework method
REu rural economic Unit
RSS random stratified sampling
SAgARPA ministry of agriculture, Livestock, rural development, fishing and food
SRS simple random sampling
SS spring–summer
SWoT strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats
viiProgram and Project design
acknowledgements
for more than ten years, the United nations food and agriculture organization (fao), through ongoing rural policy
evaluation and analysis projects, has provided technical assistance to the ministry of agriculture, Livestock, rural
development, fishing and food (sagarPa) of mexico, in the area of evaluation of programs promoting agriculture,
fishing and aquaculture production, and rural development. in the framework of this cooperation, methodological
tools have been developed jointly for the management of the different phases of a program: sector diagnosis, design,
implementation and evaluation. this document brings together the experiences obtained from the projects so that
they can be reproduced or referenced by actors involved in the management of programs or projects with similar
characteristics.
in the development of the projects the contributions of the following sagarPa officers stands out: arturo enciso
serrano, ernesto ezequiel abraham tarrab, horacio santoyo, josé de jesús romo santos, josé correa, juan carlos
vargas moreno, Lucía rosas ortíz, miguel Ángel López arreguín, omar anaya mandujano, alan Kristian hernández,
Pablo hernández alarcón, Patricia valtierra carrillo, claudia gabriela valadez romero, roberto cedeño, rogelio
carmona León, eduardo benitez Paulín, josé merced tulais López and silvia Urbina hinojosa.
a special mention is made of veronica gutierrez macías, jaime clemente hernandez and renato olvera nevarez (in
memoriam).
alfredo gonzalez cambero, who directed the projects from 2007 to 2012, and salomón salcedo baca, senior Policy
officer of the regional office for Latin america and the caribbean of the fao and at the time technical leader of the
projects, were the lead authors of this publication. ana harumi hayashida carrillo and ina salas casasola, both fao
consultants, participated in its drafting. members of the projects collaborated in the systematization of each of the four
modules of this compendium of tools, contributing their knowledge and experiences in each of the phases of a project.
Particular recognition is given to isabel madrid Pérez, ruth mendoza ortinez, mariana ortega ramirez and alejandro
davila topete who contributed to the construction of the alternatives tree for the sustainability of natural resources.
finally, the operational leadership of the projects is acknowledged to the representation office of fao in mexico.
vii
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
viii
ixProgram and Project design
Presentation
since the marrakech round table in 2004, the international community has supported five specific commitments related
to improving the effectiveness of development assistance1, synthesized in the concept of “managing for development
results”. this implies taking into account from the beginning of any initiative, project or program the expected outcomes
and how to achieve them. furthermore, the implementation, progress monitoring, and subsequent evaluation should
consider the expected outcomes that were established at the beginning of the process.
in this regard, there is a great challenge for developing countries to adopt a new vision. this means breaking with old
customs and patterns in the manner of handling the project cycle, changing from a focus on addressing demand to a
planning process for achieving specific outcomes, established from the beginning. while there is no single approach,
since each country, each sector and each project presents particular situations, there are experiences that can be
systematized and shared.
the preparation of a set of tools for results-based management responds to the need to break with inertial operating
schemes of public development programs in the majority of countries, which do not contemplate efficiency and efficacy
in achieving results. the absence of such an approach implies that substantial resources are spent without a timeframe
for resolving the problems that the public interventions are intended for.
this document brings together the experiences obtained from the evaluation and analysis of rural Policies Project
undertaken by the United nations food and agriculture organization (fao) and the mexican ministry of agriculture,
Livestock, rural development, fishing and food (sagarPa) during the implementation of the “results-based
management” focus in its different Programs. in this respect, on four occasions the national council for the evaluation
of social development Policy of mexico has granted recognition to sagarPa for its good practices in the development,
execution and evaluation of public policy in the field since 2007, taking an important step toward improving its programs
and orienting them toward performance and impact in the rural sector.
the document “results-based public management: tools for the design and implementation of public rural development
programs with a project cycle approach” includes the four phases of the life cycle of a project or program. the first
module includes the methodological tools for conducting a sector diagnosis, which constitutes the first step that justifies
the intervention by making it possible to identify a problem, dimension it, identify and quantify the population or area
facing the problem, and stratify such population.
the second module presents the procedure and methodological tools for the design of a program or project which will be
synthesized in the Logical framework. in this module the methodology is shown for conducting the objectives analysis
and the alternatives analysis, constructing performance indicators, identifying the means of verification, identifying risk
and assumptions, and collecting counterfactual data for a baseline of the performance indicators of the program or
project.
1 the principles of results-based management agreed on during the second round table on managing for development results in 2004, are: 1) focus the dialog on results in all the phases of the development process; 2) align programming, monitoring and evaluation with results; 3) keep measurement and reporting simple; 4) manage for, not by, results; and 5) use results information for learning and decision-making.
ix
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
x
the third module provides the methodology for the implementation of a program or project which, under the results
approach, should include a monitoring and evaluation system consistent with its design, budgeting, and regulation, as
well as design and processes evaluations in the first year of implementation of the program or project.
the fourth module consists of the methodology for evaluating the outcomes obtained by the program or project as a
result of its implementation through the design of the results and impact evaluation of a program or project.
each module is structured with a chapter on theory and a chapter on experience referring to the mentioned Project, and
complemented with the systematization of the methodological tools for a better understanding of the sections
Salomón Salcedo baca Alfredo gonzález Cambero
senior Policy officer Project director (2007-2012)
x
xiProgram and Project design
xi
introduction
the objectives or expected outcomes of public policy are established at the time of designing the programs or projects
that will implement the public policy. for its part, the design of public development programs begins with the proper
identification of development problems.
however, it is common to find that development programs or projects do not have a documented design. in the
majority of cases, the design is limited to the narrative summary and specific indicators in the matrixes of the logical
framework of such programs or projects. the essence of the design of a program or project, therefore, depends on the
interpretation each officer makes of such narrative summary.
the primary areas of opportunity regarding the design of programs or projects lie in the unclear definition of, or
sometimes complete failure to identify, the problem to be addressed, and in the establishing of objectives as activities,
rather than desired or achieved situations. another area of opportunity is defining the target population of a program
or project. while many programs or projects establish the target population to which they are directed, the inadequate
definition of such target population often results in a universal application of the program, which may even include those
who do not have the problem that the program or project addresses.
this module’s integrated tool set provides the technical elements necessary for the design of programs or projects,
and also includes the syntax used in establishing objectives so that they reflect achieved situations and not actions, as
commonly occurs.
to achieve the above, the integrated tool set includes the logical framework methodology so that orderly steps are
followed in the design of a program or project, ensuring internal logic with regard to its goal and purpose, as well as the
outputs and activities to achieve it.
through the stakeholders analysis a panorama is offered of all the persons, groups, organizations, institutions, state
governments, municipal governments, etc. that are involved in the actions of the program, as well as the institutional
arrangement that is required for the execution of the program or project.
for its part, through the problems analysis the development problem that underlies the design of a program or project
is identified and defined, as well as the causes and effects of such problem.
through the objectives analysis the future situation that it is desired to reach with the execution of a program or project
is established, maintaining the correspondence with the identified problem and its causes, so that the situation that
would exist after the problem is resolved is described.
the alternatives analysis allows for the design of a more succinct program or project. this step makes it possible to
identify the alternative strategies that, if executed, would contribute to changing the current situation into a desired
situation. the alternatives analysis also includes the analysis of their feasibility so that the appropriate alternatives are
chosen in function of the objectives established by the program or project.
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
xii
as part of this module dedicated to the design of programs and projects, the methodology is shown for completing,
after the analysis of objectives and alternatives, the logical framework matrix of a program, which includes the narrative
summary, performance indicators, means of verification, and risks and assumptions.
finally, a methodological section is presented for the development of counterfactual information, which is useful for
monitoring and evaluating the performance of a program or project. this component of the integrated tool set includes
the procedure for developing a baseline.
xii
xiiiProgram and Project design
iX
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
xivX
1Program and Project design
Program and project design
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
I
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
2
2.Design
1.Diagnosis
4.Evaluation
3.Implementation and Monitoring
fIguRE 1. Project Life cycLe: DESIgn
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
chapter 1Methodology for program and project design
this document contains the methodological tools for the design of a program or project, a stage that is carried out once the problems affecting the sector under study and the potential population are identified and dimensioned. the design of a project or program constitutes the second phase of the project cycle (figure 1), and includes the elements that compose a project and enable it to achieve results. the steps of the design stage are:
• analysis of objectives
• analysis of alternatives
• development of performance indicators
• identification of the means of verification
• identification of risks and assumptions
• counterfactual data collection.
3Program and Project design
this chapter is divided into six sections, each of which offers a methodological guide to facilitate the development of each of the design steps. the first section consists of showing the methodological procedures for drafting the objectives, which reflect the desired situation sought through an intervention; this section is based on the Logical framework method (Lfm) for the construction of objectives trees. the second section shows the methodological steps for analyzing the various alternatives that exist for meeting the objectives and presents the elements that provide a basis for the selection of those that are most viable. the third section analyzes the methodological aspects for developing the performance indicators that make it possible to evaluate both results and implementation of the program or project. the fourth section offers criteria for identifying the means of verification or sources of information for obtaining the data used to measure the progress of the indicators and whether or not the objectives of the program or project are being achieved. the fifth section covers the methodology for identifying the risks that could affect the implementation of the program or project, which are expressed as assumptions that must be considered since they condition the development of activities and outputs, as well as the achievement of the Purpose and goal of the program or project. the sixth section contains the set of tools for conducting a baseline study for a program or project which would provide counterfactual data for future monitoring and evaluation of a program or project.
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
4
1.1 objectives analysis
the analysis of objectives makes it possible to portray the future situation to be reached once the problems have been solved through an intervention. for that purpose, the development of objectives consists of converting the negative states identified in the problem analysis into desired situations according to feasibility principles; in other words, that the objectives can be achieved using the resources and time available for the development of the program or project. the results of this analysis are summarized in an objectives tree as presented in figure 2.
fIguRE 2. objectives tree
Central objective (Purpose)
Goal
Means
5Program and Project design
How the objectives tree is prepared
in the context of a program or project there are four types of objectives, which are classified according to their hierarchical order:
1. goal the sector’s development objective to which the project is intended to contribute. the goal’s full completion is beyond the scope of the project or program, but the combination of the latter with other programs or projects will lead to its achievement.
2. Purpose it is the specific objective of the program or project and it is fulfilled when the implementation of the intervention is completed.
3. outputs they are the result of the activities of the program or project, and they take the form of goods and services that are provided to achieve the Purpose of the program or project.
4. Activitiesthey are the tasks or actions that the implementer must carry out in order to produce each of the outputs of a program or project. the activities can be disaggregated in turn into sub-activities or inputs.
there must be a causal link between the different levels of objectives, which is known as the vertical logic. in this regard, if the program or project is well designed the following should hold:
a) the activities specified for each output are those necessary and sufficient to produce the output,
b) the outputs are those necessary and sufficient to achieve the Purpose of the project or program, and
c) the achievement of the Purpose must contribute significantly to the goal.
fIguRE 3. verticaL Logic of a Program or Project
goal
Purpose
output 1
activity 1.1
activity 1.2
activity 1.3
output 2
activity 2.1
activity 2.2
activity 2.3
output 3
activity 3.1
activity 3.2
activity 3.3
output 4
activity 4.1
activity 4.2
activity 4.3
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
6
in order to determine each of these objectives, an objectives analysis is conducted, which consists of substituting the current situations (negative) for the desired situations. for example:
RECoMMEnDATIonS foR ThE DEVEloPMEnT of ThE objECTIVES TREE
natural resources used sustainably
degraded natural resources
Problem objective
1. objectives should be drafted expressing an achieved situation. For example: “Fishers trained in environmentally friendly fishing techniques”.
2. do not include in the same statement the means and the end. For example: “Farmers use new cultivation techniques to increase their productivity.” in this case the end is “to increase productivity”, and the means is the “use of new cultivation techniques”.
3. avoid establishing desired situations that are unlikely to be achieved considering that there are limits in resources and time.
4. the vertical relationship between “means and end” should be verified. the guiding question is “how?”.
f o r m o r e i n f o r m at i o n :
bID (2004). El marco lógico para el diseño de proyectos. washington, dc.
Comisión Europea (2001). Manual gestión del ciclo de proyecto. ede, the netherlands.
heemskerk, nick et al. (1995). Manual for Project planning. amsterdam, the netherlands.
IlPES-CEPAl (2004). Metodología del marco lógico. boletín 15. santiago de chile.
IlPES-CEPAl (2005). Metodología del marco lógico para la planificación y la evaluación de proyectos y programas. santiago de chile.
Schmeer, K. (1999). Guidelines for conducting a stakeholder analysis. bethesda, md.
7Program and Project design
a B c
1.2 alternatives analysis
from the objectives analysis a vision is obtained of all the necessary and sufficient means to solve the identified problem. the objectives tree makes it possible to determine the necessary outputs that must be integrated into the intervention in order to contribute to solving the problem at hand. however, the alternatives to achieve it can be many and the team responsible for designing the program or project must choose the best among all the possible alternatives.
the alternatives analysis provides a systematic method for selecting the strategy on which each output of the program or project will be based. some of the criteria that may be considered are: relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, economic viability, technical viability, institutional viability and environmental impact.
How the alternatives analysis is done
the first step is to identify the different options or group of actions that can lead to an output. these activities constitute the “alternatives”.
fIguRE 4. identification of aLternatives (1)
in addition, through this analysis the groups of alternatives that are complementary among themselves for achieving an output can be identified. such complementary groups can themselves be grouped into a new option. there are other groups of alternatives that are exclusionary, and cannot be considered in the same strategy. in this example groups a and c are exclusionary, but groups a and b are complementary, as are b and c. therefore, a new group called “d” can be created which is equal to set a+b, and a group “e” which is equal to set b+c.
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
8
d e
after identifying the various alternatives, the next step is to analyze them. the criteria for analyzing them vary according to the type of project and the context in which it is being carried out. some of these criteria are:
a. Relevance
this refers to the coherence that the alternative has with the policies of the implementing institution and with the priorities of the target population. the stakeholder analysis helps to clarify which alternative better meets the priorities of the potential population.
b. Efficacy
measures the degree to which the alternative solves or best contributes to solving the problem that was identified. this criterion has a great deal of weight, since it has to do with moving from the problem situation to the desired situation.
c. Efficiency
analyzes the balance between the benefit and the cost of each alternative from the economic point of view; in other words, what alternative generates the greatest benefit at the least cost. the cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analyses are useful for evaluating this criterion.
d. financial viability
examines the financial viability of each alternative. it centers on evaluating the availability of financial resources for funding the alternatives, as well as on the opportunity cost of the alternatives.
e. Technical viability
this is the technical capability (specialized human resources and adequate equipment) to implement the program or project.
fIguRE 5. identification of aLternatives (2)
9Program and Project design
f. Institutional viability
this refers to the institutional capacity which depends on various factors, such as the institutional setting in which the program or project will be implemented.
g. Environmental impact
analyzes the environmental impact and cost compared to the benefit of each alternative.
if the information is insufficient to make a comparison of the various alternatives, collecting data through feasibility studies for each alternative should be considered. the results of the feasibility studies contain quantitative information that facilitates the comparison of alternatives.
the last step is the selection of the alternative. one form of doing so is to rate each alternative on a scale from 1 to 5 and, based on the results, choose the most suitable one. the results of the alternatives analysis are entered into a comparative matrix where the global evaluation of each alternative can be seen and from which the most suitable one is selected (table 1).
alternativeevaluation criteria
globalrelevance efficacy efficiency financial
viabilitytechnical viability
institutional viability
environmental impact
a 4 4 5 4 4 4 3 28
b 4 3 4 4 3 3 4 25
c 2 3 3 3 3 3 4 21
d 5 4 5 4 4 4 5 31
e 5 4 2 1 2 2 3 19
RECoMMEnDATIonS foR PREPARIng ThE AlTERnATIVES AnAlySIS
as a result of the alternatives analysis it is possible to determine the goal, the Purpose, the outputs, and the activities of the project. the highest level becomes the goal, the central objective becomes the Purpose, the direct means of which become the outputs, and the underlying levels become the activities that are necessary and sufficient to achieve each output. this alignment makes up the first column (narrative summary) of the Logical framework (figure 6).
1. Verify the interdependence among the proposed actions and group those that are complementary. each of these groups may become an alternative itself.
2. separate the actions that are exclusionary in different alternatives.
3. Formulate the alternatives considering their level of impact on the solution of the problem.
TAblE 1. evaLUation of aLternatives matrix
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
10
narrative summary
indicatorsMeans of
VerificationRisks/
assumptions
goal
Purpose
outputs
activities
alTeRnaTIVes seleCTeD
these first two stages of analysis (objectives analysis and alternatives analysis) provide the elements for preparing the narrative summary of the Logical framework. the next columns which correspond to the indicators, means of verification, and risks and assumptions are explained in detail in the following sections. the Logical framework provides a visual structure that synthesizes, in a single table, the most important information of a program or project; furthermore, it provides a clear and simple expression of the internal logic of a particular program or project and of the results expected with its implementation.
f o r m o r e i n f o r m at i o n :
bID (2004). El marco lógico para el diseño de proyectos. washington, dc.
Comisión Europea (2001). Manual gestión del ciclo de proyecto. ede, the netherlands.
heemskerk, nick et al. (1995). Manual for Project planning. amsterdam, the netherlands.
IlPES-CEPAl (2004). Metodología del marco lógico. Boletín 15. santiago de chile.
IlPES-CEPAl (2005). Metodología del marco lógico para la planificación y la evaluación de proyectos y programas. santiago de chile.
The World bank. The logframe handbook: A logical framework approach to Project management.
fIguRE 6. from the anaLysis of aLternatives to the LogicaL frameworK
11Program and Project design
1.3 Performance indicators
through the objectives and alternatives analysis the goal, the Purpose, the outputs, and the activities of a program or project are defined. the next step is to set performance indicators, with their respective targets, to make it possible to establish measurement parameters of what it is expected to achieve with a project or program in terms of coverage, results, and impact. the indicators establish relationships among variables and provide the basis for making comparisons between the actual situation and the counterfactual one, in addition to a continuous monitoring of the main elements of the intervention.
Performance indicators describe the targets of the project on each expected objectives level: goal, Purpose or output. in this way, the indicators make it possible to quantify the achievements, and they become the point of reference and the “navigation chart” for guiding the implementation, monitoring, and evaluation of the project. well formulated indicators ensure good management of the project and allow the implementers of the project or program to decide if additional outputs or course corrections will be necessary in order to achieve the Purpose laid out. in addition, upon finalizing the intervention it will be known if the expected impact and effects on the beneficiaries was achieved.
How the performance indicators are developed
the first step is to list all the indicators available and classify them according to achievement in the various objective levels of the Logical framework. according to the objective level that the indicators measure, they can be classified as:
a) Results indicators. measure the degree of fulfillment of the objectives (goal and Purpose) of a program or project, and
b) Process indicators. measure the progress in the processes of the program or project: the products and services delivered (outputs) and the actions to do so (activities).
an indicator should have certain attributes such as quantity, quality, time, and area benefited:
a) Quantity: it should establish in numerical terms the level of progress with respect to what was planned.
b) Quality: offers information about the attributes of the outputs.
c) Time: measures the achievements in a specific period of time.
d) Area: offers information on the coverage of the achievements.
the next step is to select the optimum indicators in order to reduce the number of indicators to a minimum. for that purpose, the criteria that the indicators should meet should be defined in order to facilitate their selection. some of these criteria may be:
a) Clarity: the indicator should be understandable.
b) Relevance: the indicator should provide information on the essence of the objective to be measured; that is to say, it should be defined based on what is important.
c) objectivity: the indicator should be tangible and observable.
d) Cost effectiveness: the indicator should be available at a reasonable cost.
e) Timeliness: the indicator should be available in a timely manner.
f) Independence: it should be possible to develop the indicator independently.
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
12
RECoMMEnDATIonS foR ThE DEVEloPMEnT of InDICAToRS
one useful tool is the weighting of the criteria defined for the selection of indicators as shown in table 2. each criterion is rated on a scale from 1 to 5 for each indicator proposed and, based on the results, the most suitable is chosen.
objetives IndicatorRating of criteria
Total pointsSelected
a b c d e f yes no
TAblE 2. weighting for the seLection of indicators
1. establish indicators according to the hierarchy of the objectives. the indicators for the highest level (goal) measure the long-term effects linked to lasting changes. therefore, these indicators can go beyond the scope of the program or project. For example: Rate of growth of agricultural gdP. For their part, the Purpose indicators measure the immediate changes generated by a program or project. For example: capitalization of farmers benefited by the program for the acquisition of capital goods. the indicators of outputs measure the delivery of specific goods or services within the structure of a project. For example: Farmers benefited by the acquisition of farm machinery.
2. each objective should have at least one indicator. there should not be a goal, a Purpose, outputs or activities that do not have their respective indicators, since each indicator measures the achievement of objectives in a particular time period, and that makes it possible to monitor and evaluate the performance of a program or project.
3. do not include too many indicators for the same objective. having an exaggerated number of indicators involves a high cost for the generation and monitoring of data, and therefore those for which monitoring does not imply a high cost should be prioritized and selected.
4. do not include indicators that cannot be verified. even if they are well designed, sometimes the indicators cannot be verified due to the fact that the means of verification does not exist or it is outdated.
5. the same indicator should not be repeated for different objective levels of the narrative summary.
6. Prepare performance indicator reference sheets that contain elements for their proper measurement such as: Method of calculation, frequency of measurement, unit of measurement, baseline, and target. in table 5 some examples are presented.
Source: Handbook of monitoring and evaluating for results. United Nations Development Programme, Evaluation Office.
13Program and Project design
the indicators for each objective are placed in the second column of the logical framework as seen in figure 7.
fIguRE 7. LogicaL frameworK: InDICAToRS
in conclusion, the indicators are variables that make it possible to measure the level of achievement reached by the program or project in fulfillment of all its objective levels. in this regard, objectives and indicators are inseparable concepts, since the indicators exist in order to measure the fulfillment of the objectives. in the following section the methodology for identifying or establishing the means of verification is discussed.
f o r m o r e i n f o r m at i o n :
bID (2004). El marco lógico para el diseño de proyectos. washington, dc.
Comisión Europea (2001). Manual gestión del ciclo de proyecto. ede, the netherlands.
heemskerk, nick et al. (1995). Manual for Project planning. amsterdam, the netherlands.
IlPES-CEPAl (2003). Los indicadores de evaluación del desempeño: una herramienta para la gestión por resultados en América Latina. boletín 13. santiago de chile.
IlPES-CEPAl (2004). Metodología del marco lógico. boletín 15. santiago de chile.
IlPES-CEPAl (2005). Metodología del marco lógico para la planificación y la evaluación de proyectos y programas. santiago de chile.
The World bank (1996). Performance monitor indicators: A handbook for managers. washington, dc.
The World bank. The logframe handbook: A logical framework approach to Project management. washington, dc.
The World bank (2004). Ten steps to a results-based monitoring and evaluation system. washington, dc.
united nations Development Programme, Evaluation office (2002). Handbook of monitoring and evaluating for results. new york, ny.
narrative summary indicators Means of Verification Risks/assumptions
goal
Purpose
outputs
activities
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
14
1.4 Means of verification
the means of verification are the sources of information that are used to obtain the data needed to measure the progress of the indicators and, by that, corroborate whether or not the objectives of the project or program are being achieved.
What the means of verification should contain
as the basis, together with the indicators, for the evaluation of the program or project, the means of verification not only should contain the source of data, but also specify the method that will be used to collect them, the method of analysis, the periodicity or frequency of data collection and the agency or entity responsible for collecting them. in this regard, the means of verification should be very precise so that it is clear where, now and in the future, the data required for the calculation and monitoring of the performance indicators of the program or project can be found.
in the Logical framework only the data source is indicated. therefore, it is necessary to prepare an independent table for each indicator that contains the following elements:
a) Source. the data to verify the indicators may require a review of secondary sources (records in public offices) or primary sources (collection in the field and data analysis).
b) Method of collection. there is a wide variety of methods for collecting data, from interviews with key informants to surveys and direct observation in the field, focus groups, etc.
c) Method of analysis. the analysis of data can be done through a comparison of data, for example cost efficiency analysis, cause and effect analysis, etc.
d) frequency of collection. the frequency of data collection varies according to the hierarchical level of the objectives and the requirements of the stakeholders. for example, the activities are monitored with a frequency that may be weekly, monthly, quarterly or semi-annual in order to give timely follow up on the progress of the program or project. in contrast, the Purpose is monitored at specific times, such as an intermediate or final evaluation.
e) Agency or entity responsible for collecting the information. it should be clearly established what agency or entity is responsible for the collection and analysis of data.
the following table is a useful tool for defining the means of verification in an organized manner.
level narrative Summary Indicator
Means of verification
Source of information
Method of collection
Method of analysis
frequency of
collection
Responsible entity
goal
Purpose
outputs
activities
Source: Handbook of monitoring and evaluating for results. United Nations Development Programme, Evaluation Office.
TAblE 3. means of verification by indicator
15Program and Project design
the relationship between objectives, indicators and means of verification leads to what is known as horizontal logic, which is met when:
a) the means of verification are those necessary and sufficient to obtain the data required for the calculation of indicators.
b) the indicators are adequately structured and make it possible to follow up on the project or program and evaluate the achievement of objectives.
RECoMMEnDATIonS foR ESTAblIShIng ThE MEAnS of VERIfICATIon
1. a good indicator should be verifiable. this means that there should be a means of verification to measure it. in addition, it should be ensured that the means of verification produces data with the frequency required.
2. the means of verification should be up to date sources with the required disaggregation.
3. data sources should be described precisely. it is not sufficient to mention, for example: “data of the Ministry of agriculture”. all the relevant information for identifying the data source should be included: name of the database, date of last update, period measured, unit responsible for the information, etc.
4. sometimes the information required does not have a source of data. in these cases, the generation of data should be added as an activity of the program or project and budgeted for, as for example: Baseline data to be collected by the program or project.
fIguRE 8. horizontaL Logic of the Program or Project
narrative summary indicators Means of Verification Risks/assumptions
goal
Purpose
outputs
activities
Source: ILPES-CEPAL, 2005. Metodología del marco lógico para la planificación y la evaluación de proyectos y programas.
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
16
the means of verification are shown in the third column of the Logical framework (figure 9).
fIguRE 9. LogicaL frameworK: MEAnS of VERIfICATIon
narrative summary indicators Means of verification Risks/assumptions
goal
Purpose
outputs
activities
the means of verification should indicate where the data is to be obtained from in order to measure both process indicators (for outputs and activities) and results indicators (for goal and Purpose) for the monitoring or evaluation of a project or program. just as the objectives and the indicators are inseparable, the indicators and the means of verification form another relationship that cannot be separated. if an indicator does not have a means of verification, it is necessary to look for one.
f o r m o r e i n f o r m at i o n :
bID (2004). El marco lógico para el diseño de proyectos. washington, dc.
Comisión Europea (2001). Manual gestión del ciclo de proyecto. ede, the netherlands.
heemskerk, nick et al. (1995). Manual for Project planning. amsterdam, the netherlands.
IlPES-CEPAl (2004). Metodología del marco lógico. boletín 15. santiago de chile.
IlPES-CEPAl (2005). Metodología del marco lógico para la planificación y la evaluación de proyectos y programas. santiago de chile.
The World bank. The logframe handbook: A logical framework approach to Project management. washington, dc.
united nations Development Programme, Evaluation office (2002). Handbook of monitoring and evaluating for results. new york, ny.
17Program and Project design
narrative summary indicators Means of Verification Risks/assumptions
goal
Purpose
outputs
activities
1.5 Risks and assumptions
the risks and assumptions are important events, conditions or decisions that are beyond the control of the implementer and which, nevertheless, are important in order for the project or program to advance at each objective level and achieve its goal. in other words, they are risks expressed in assumptions that must be met in order to advance to the next level in the hierarchy of objectives of the project.
in the Logical framework a diagonal logic is expressed; that is, if the activities are carried out and certain assumptions are met then the outputs are produced; if the outputs are produced and certain assumptions are met then the Purpose of the project is achieved; if the Purpose is produced and the further assumptions are met, then it contributes to the achievement of the goal (figure 10).
fIguRE 10. reLationshiP between risKs/assUmPtions and objectives
Source: ILPES-CEPAL, 2005. Metodología del marco lógico para la planificación y la evaluación de proyectos y programas.
the risks confronted by a program or project are of diverse origins, which may be cultural or ethnic, political, economic, social, or natural. in some cases it may be possible to neutralize such risks, in which case the neutralization measures should be incorporated into the program or project strategy. in other cases they cannot be neutralized, and therefore they must always be kept in mind since they could eventually impede the achievement of objectives.
How to identify the risks and assumptions
there are some sources that make it possible to identify assumptions or risks. for example, through the analysis of stakeholders, information is obtained on the expectations and interests of the principal groups involved in a possible program or project. this analysis can produce information on cultural or ethnic assumptions. another source of information can be through the use of analysis tools such as swot (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats). through the swot analysis, political, economic, and social assumptions of the context in which the program or project will take place can be identified.
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
18
finally, the assumptions related to nature refer mainly to climate conditions that affect the projects related to activities such as agriculture, fishing, etc. in these cases, it is useful to study the climate history of the area in which the program or project is located in order to calculate the probability of occurrence. the following table may be helpful for this task.
level narrative Summary
Risks/Assumptions
Cultural Political Economic Social Environmental
goal
Purpose
outputs
activities
TAblE 4. identification of risKs and assUmPtions
Source: ILPES-CEPAL, 2005. Metodología del marco lógico para la planificación y la evaluación de proyectos y programas.
some examples of assumptions could be “agricultural prices remain stable”, “farmers do not oppose the introduction of technological changes”, “the economy maintains its rate of growth”, etc. however, for an assumption to be considered as such, it should have a reasonable likelihood of occurrence. an assumption with a high likelihood of occurrence and of high relevance is a factor that can stop the implementation of a program or project and in such a case the nature of activities, outputs, and Purpose should be analyzed at each level of the narrative summary of the program. to support this analysis the following flow chart can be used for the verification of risks and assumptions.
likelihood of redesign?
likelihood of occurrence?
Relevant?
External?
assumption
Includemedium
Continueyes
yesno
Do not include
noStop
yes
no
high
fIguRE 11. fLow chart for the verification of risKs and assUmPtions
Source: ILPES-CEPAL, 2005. Metodología del marco lógico para la planificación y la evaluación de proyectos y programas.
19Program and Project design
even if all the activities planned are executed according to the program, it is possible that the expected results will not be achieved due to external factors (risks and assumptions). these factors are beyond the control of the program or project, but they are essential for carrying it out. therefore, they should be determined beforehand and monitored. in the Logical framework the risks and assumptions are outlined in the fourth column (figure12).
RECoMMEnDATIonS foR IDEnTIfyIng IMPoRTAnT RISKS AnD ASSuMPTIonS
1. the elements that should be considered in the determination of a risk or assumption are: a) it is beyond the control of the project, b) it is relevant, and c) it is likely to occur.
2. the assumptions should be drafted as a realized situation or one that is maintained. For example: “support to farmers is maintained as a priority of the new government”.
3. it should be possible to monitor the assumptions during the execution of the project. Monitoring the assumptions increases the probability of success of the program or project, and it also makes it possible to incorporate or remove new assumptions as the exogenous situation influencing the project changes.
fIguRE 12. LogicaL frameworK: RISKS/ASSuMPTIonS
narrative summary indicators Means of Verification Risks/assumptions
goal
Purpose
outputs
activities
so far the methodology has been shown for the preparation of the Logical framework composed of four columns: narrative summary, indicators, means of verification, and relevant risks and assumptions. the information contained in the framework as a whole constitutes a managerial tool considered to be a “compass” of the project or program, which can be used in the phases of implementation, monitoring, and evaluation.
another product of the design phase is the baseline or base measurement of the performance indicators. through this process counterfactual data is obtained that makes it possible to monitor the progress of the program or project and evaluate its impact. the following section is dedicated to showing the methodology for carrying this out.
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
20
1.6 counterfactual data
the baseline study is the first measurement of all the indicators contemplated in the design of a program or project before its implementation. in this manner a point of departure is established for the intervention consisting of the value of the indicators at the time of initiating the planned actions, which is crucial since it is through the actions or activities of the program or project that the impacts of the intervention are to be achieved.
the following are among the principal characteristics of a baseline study:
a) generates quantitative data. Quantitative measurements are comparable in time and nature, although the possibility of using qualitative data as a point of departure is not discarded.
b) uses primary sources (ad-hoc). it is preferable that the baseline use principally primary sources, although the use of sources such as censuses, national surveys, regional diagnostics and prior studies, among other sources of information, should not be ruled out, provided they back up the required data given the fact that often development projects concern a specific scenario not contemplated by other researchers.
c) Measures specific indicators. specific indicators allow for the measurement of the results and impacts of the program as an effect of the interventions. this is of great importance in order to have elements on which to judge the effectiveness of the analyzed program or project.
f o r m o r e i n f o r m at i o n :
bID (2004). El marco lógico para el diseño de proyectos. washington, dc.
Comisión Europea (2001). Manual gestión del ciclo de proyecto. ede, the netherlands.
heemskerk, nick et al. (1995). Manual for Project planning. amsterdam, the netherlands.
IlPES-CEPAl (2004). Metodología del marco lógico. boletín 15. santiago de chile.
IlPES-CEPAl (2005). Metodología del marco lógico para la planificación y la evaluación de proyectos y programas. santiago de chile.
The World bank. The logframe handbook: A logical framework approach to Project management. washington, dc.
united nations Development Programme, Evaluation office (2002). Handbook of monitoring and evaluating for results. new york, ny.
How to conduct a baseline study
the methodology for preparing a baseline varies depending on the magnitude of the program or project being implemented, as well as the data available to measure the indicators that have been designed. on this basis, the team in charge of the formulation of the project must design the field work to collect the data.
Part 2.7.3 synthesizes the experience of the food and agriculture organization (fao) in mexico in the preparation of the baseline of the Programs of the ministry of agriculture, Livestock, rural development, fishing and food (sagarPa) regarding two primary tools: a) sample design and b) survey questionnaire.
21Program and Project design
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
22
23Program and Project design
case study 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
II
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
24
chapter 2example of program design
this chapter draws from the experience and tools developed by the fao Project on Policy analysis and evaluation in the framework of the technical assistance cooperation agreement with the ministry of agriculture, Livestock, rural development, fishing and food (sagarPa).
2.1 analysis of objectives for the design of a program for sustainable use of natural resources in the rural and fishing sector
the analysis of objectives for the design of a program for sustainable use of natural resources for primary production started from the Diagnosis of the Rural and Fishing Sector of Mexico2. the diagnosis posits as the central problem the unsustainable development of such sector and states that one of the main causes of this problem is the degradation of natural resources and, in turn, indicates as secondary causes the over exploitation of fishing resources, the erosion of soil, the salinization of soil, the over exploitation of water resources, the contamination of water and soil, and the emission of greenhouse gases (figure 13).
2 http://smye.info/cuestionario_final/diagnostico/menu_f.php
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
fIguRE 13. ProbLem tree of the degradation of natUraL resoUrces in the rUraL and fishing sector
Source: Diagnóstico del sector rural y pesquero de México. FAO-SAGARPA.
high emission of carbon from
production activities of
the rural and fishing sector
mishandling of agriculture and
aquaculture production
waste
excessive use of
agrochemicals
Emissions of greenhouse
gases
Contamination of water and
soil
overexploitation of water
resources
energy distorting subsidies
Low irrigation efficiency
no or little control of
concessions or quotas of water
use
overconcessioning of water use
Salinization of soil
excessive irrigation
saline intrusion
Erosion of soil
inadequate tillage
techniques
excessive stocking rate
deforestation
Use of soil not apt for agricultural production
overexploitation of fishing resources
excess of small-scale
fishing vessels
excessive capture
of juvenile organisms
closed seasons not
enforced
degradation of natural resources in the rural and fishing sector
25Program and Project design
in turn, each one of these causes is explained by more specific causes. for example, causes of the overexploitation of fishing resources include the excess of small-scale fishing vessels, the excessive capture of juvenile organisms, and failure to enforce closed seasons.
based on this problem tree, experts in the area proposed the following objectives tree, in which the desired situations are expressed (figure 14).
fIguRE 14. objectives tree for the design of a Program on sUstainabLe Use of natUraL resoUrces in the rUraL and fishing
sector of mexico
carbon is sequestered in the rural sector
an integral system of waste management is implemented
the use of agrochemicals
is reduced
The generation of greenhouse
gas emissions in the
agriculture and fishing sector is reduced
farm and aquacultural production
units prevent contamination of water and soil through
best practices of waste and input
management
Water resources are made use of maintaining a positive water
balance
irrigation efficiency is improved
Soil salinization is
reduced
irrigation techniques by micro-sprinkler are established
salts are leached from
soils
Soil erosion is controlled
tillage techniques are
adequate
stocking rate is kept at levels that avoid soil compaction
Loss of plant cover in farms
is avoided
fishing resources are made use of
at a rate lower than that of their
regeneration
small scale fishing is regulated
fishing gear is used that avoid
the capture of juvenile organisms
closed seasons are
enforced
natural resources are used sustainably in the rural and fishing sector
the emission of carbon in
agricultural and fishing activities
is reduced
measures to prevent the
accumulation of salts are established
the use of soil not apt for
agricultural production is
avoided
the irrigation system in the primary sector
is orderly
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
26
as can be seen, the main task in the construction of the objectives tree consists of substituting all the negative situations of the problem tree with positive situations. through this process it is possible to delineate the objectives of a program or project. however, to concretely define its outputs and activities, it is necessary to do an alternatives analysis. regarding the central problem, this becomes the Purpose upon expressing the desired situation that reverses the negative situation expressed in the problem (figure 15). the outputs should be those in number and nature that are sufficient and necessary to achieve the Purpose.
Purpose. natural resources are used sustainably in the rural and fishing sector
output 1fishing resources are made use
of at a rate lower than that of their regeneration
output 2soil erosion is controlled
output 3soil salinization is reduced
output 4water resources are made use of maintaining a positive water
balance
output 5farm and aquacultural production
units prevent contamination of water and soil through best practices of
waste and input management
output 6the generation of greenhouse gases in the agriculture and
fishing sector is reduced
fIguRE 15. PUrPose and oUtPUts in the rUraL and fishing sector
27Program and Project design
for their part, in order to achieve each output, the necessary and sufficient activities to contribute to carrying out such output should be specified (figure 16).
fIguRE 16. generaL activities for each oUtPUt
output 1fishing resources are made use of at a rate lower than that of their regeneration
output 2soil erosion is controlled
output 3soil salinization is reduced
output 4water resources are made use of
maintaining a positive water balance
output 5farm and aquacultural production units prevent contamination of water and soil
through best practices of waste and input management
output 6the generation of greenhouse gases in the
agriculture sector is reduced
1.1 regulate small scale fishing
1.2 Use of fishing gear that prevents the capture of juvenile organisms
1.3 enforce closed seasons
2.1 adopt adequate tillage techniques
2.2 apply measures to ensure the stocking rate is maintained at levels that prevent soil compaction
2.3 implement actions to prevent the loss of plant cover in farm production units
2.4 implement actions to prevent the use of land not apt for farm production
3.1 establish micro-sprinkler irrigation systems
3.2 Leach salts from soil
3.3 establish measures that prevent salt accumulation
4.1 regulate the irrigation system in the primary sector
4.2 Promote the efficient use of water
5.1 implement an integral waste management system
5.2 implement measures to reduce the use of agrochemicals
6.1 implement actions for carbon sequestration in the rural sector
6.2 implement measures for the reduction of carbon emissions in agriculture and fishing activities
once the activities relevant for each of the outputs are defined, the alternatives pertinent for carrying out the activities should be analyzed and selected.
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
28
output 1: Fishing resources are made use of at a rate lower than that of their regeneration
a C T I V I T I e s :
1.1 Regulate small scale fishing
1.2 use of fishing gear that prevents the capture of juvenile organisms
1.3 Enforce closed seasons
activity 1.1 Regulate small scale fishing
for activity 1.1 “regulate small scale fishing”, three alternatives were identified. the first one proposes the regulation of small scale fishing through the implementation of a system of transferrable fishing quotas according to the biomass limit. the second alternative suggests adjusting the number of grantable permits according to the capacity of each region, such that when the number of grantable permits is exceeded cancellation is applied, and when the number of grantable permits is below the limit the legalization of illegal fishermen is allowed. the third alternative proposes the buyback of fishing permits. the three alternatives are based on the need to know the biomass limit per fishery to establish a number of grantable permits and to strengthen oversight.
Alternative A. Implement a system of transferrable fishing quotas based on biomass limits
a. evaluate the biomass limit in each fisheryi. establish the number of grantable permits
b. implement a system of transferrable fishing quotas according to the biomass limitc. identify and remove illegal fishermen
i. establish a temporary employment program for illegal fishermend. strengthen the oversight capacities in the fishing sector
Alternative b. Adjust the number of grantable permits based on the capacity of each region
a. evaluate the biomass limit in each fisheryi. establish the number of grantable permits
b. identify and remove illegal fishermeni. establish a temporary employment program for illegal fishermen
c. adjust the number of grantable permitsi. cancellation of fishing permits according to the number of grantable permits (when the limit of
permissible biomass is exceeded) ii. Legalize illegal fishermen according to the number of grantable permits (when the permissible
biomass is not exceeded)d. strengthen the oversight capacities in the fishing sector
Alternative C. buyback fishing permits
a. evaluate the biomass limit in each fisheryi. establish the number of grantable permits
b. identify and remove illegal fishermenii. establish a Program of temporary employment for illegal fishermen
c. buy back fishing permitsd. strengthen the oversight capacities in the fishing sector
29Program and Project design
activity 1.2 use of fishing gear that prevents the capture of juvenile organisms
for activity 1.2 “Use of fishing gear that prevents the capture of juvenile organisms” two alternatives were identified, which are complementary:
Alternative A. Substitute fishing equipment and gear
a. substitute and acquire fishing equipment and gear
i. Provide subsidies for the purchase of fishing equipment and gear that prevent the capture of juvenile organisms
Alternative b. Train fishermen
a. train fishermen
i. Prepare a catalog of fishing gearii. carry out demonstration projects in which the capture of juvenile organisms is prevented
activity 1.3 enforce closed seasons
only one alternative was identified for activity 1.3 “enforce closed seasons”, which consists of:
Alternative A. Strengthen the activities of inspection and oversight
a. strengthen the activities of inspection and oversight
i. increase the inspection and oversight corpsii. train the inspection and oversight corps
iii. Purchase of equipment for inspectors and oversight personnel
b. implement a penalties system
c. develop campaigns to raise awareness of enforcement of closed seasons
output 2: soil erosion is controlled
a C T I V I T I e s :
2.1 Adopt adequate tillage techniques
2.2 Apply measures to ensure the stocking rate is maintained at levels that prevent soil compaction
2.3 Implement actions to prevent the loss of plant cover in farm production units
2.4 Implement actions to prevent the use of land not apt for farm production
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
30
activity 2.1 adopt adequate tillage techniques
four alternatives for activity 2.1 “adopt adequate tillage techniques” are proposed:
Alternative A. Implement conservation tillage
a. grant compensation for soil conservation
b. subsidize soil conservation tillage activities
c. Provide training and technical assistance through “farm schools”
Alternative b. Promote crop rotation and crops interspersed with fruit trees (CIfT)
a. subsidize the purchase of plant material for the promotion of cift
b. Provide training and technical assistance on cift systems through “farm schools”
Alternative C. Implement agro-forestry
a. subsidize the purchase of plant material for agro-forestry
b. Provide training and technical assistance in agro-forestry through “farm schools”
Alternative D. Conversion to crops that fix soil nutrients
a. develop and disseminate technology packages
b. subsidize the planting of crops that fix soil nutrients
c. Provide training and technical assistance through “farm schools”
activity 2.2 apply measures to ensure the stocking rate is maintained at levels that prevent soil compaction
two alternatives are identified for activity 2.2 “apply measures to ensure the stocking rate is maintained at levels that prevent soil compaction”:
Alternative A. Implement best practices systems in grassland management
a. train livestock producers in the best use of grassland
b. subsidize the implementation of best practices in grassland management
Alternative b. Promote the stabling of livestock
a. Provide training to producers for the production and conservation of low cost forage
b. subsidize the purchase of farm assets for the stabling of livestock
c. Provide training and technical assistance for handling stabled livestock
31Program and Project design
activity 2.3 implement actions to prevent the loss of plant cover in farm production units
two alternatives are proposed for activity 2.3 “implement actions to prevent the loss of plant cover in farm production units”:
Alternative A. Control the expansion of farm land
a. implement penalties for changing land use
Alternative b. Recover abandoned farm land
a. develop and disseminate technology packages
b. subsidize the application of technology packages through which farm land can be recovered
activity 2.4 implement actions to prevent the use of land not apt for farm production
as an alternative for activity 2.4 “implement actions to prevent the use of land not apt for farm production” the following is proposed:
Alternative A. Control the expansion of farm land
b. implement penalties for changing land use
output 3: soil salinization is reduced
a C T I V I T I e s :
3.1 Establish micro-sprinkler irrigation systems
3.2 leach salts from soil
3.3 Establish measures that prevent salt accumulation
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
32
activity 3.1 establish micro-sprinkler irrigation systems
the following are considered alternatives of activity 3.1 “establish micro-sprinkler irrigation systems”:
Alternative A. Subsidize the purchase of micro-sprinkler irrigation systems
a. Provide subsidies for the purchase of sprinkler irrigation equipment
Alternative b. Provide training and technical assistance for the use of technified irrigation
a. training and technical assistance on the use and implementation of technified irrigation systems
activity 3.2 leach salts from soil
the following alternatives are established for activity 3.2 “Leach salts from soil”:
Alternative A. grant subsidies for soil washing activities a. Provide subsidies for soil washing activities
Alternative b. Provide training and technical assistance for soil washing activitiesa. training and technical assistance on soil washing activities
activity 3.3 establish measures that prevent salt accumulation
the following alternatives are considered for activity 3.3 “establish measures that prevent salt accumulation”:
Alternative A. Promote among producers adequate water drainage
a. Provide subsidies for the purchase of sprinkler irrigation equipment
Alternative b. Cancel water use permits in aquifers with salinization problems
a. carry out an analysis to determine the level of salt concentration in aquifers
b. cancel water use permits in aquifers with serious salinization problems
c. determine and implement alternative systems to capture irrigation water
Alternative C. Implement alternative systems for the capture and use of irrigation water
a. subsidize infrastructure and equipment for the capture of rain water
b. give training on management and maintenance of rain water capture systems
33Program and Project design
Alternative D. Treatment of salty waters
a. Provide support for carrying out salty water treatment works
b. subsidize works for the distribution of treated water
output 4. Water resources are made use of maintaining a positive water balance
a C T I V I T I e s :
4.1 Regulate the irrigation system in the primary sector
4.2 Promote the efficient use of water
activity 4.1 Regulate the irrigation system in the primary sector
the following are alternatives of activity 4.1 “regulate the irrigation system in the primary sector”:
Alternative A. Implement a system of optimal irrigation quotas
a. evaluate the optimum levels of water extraction
b. establish the permissible water extraction quotas
c. establish a penalties system
d. control water levels within the optimum levels
i. establish a penalties system
Alternative b. Regulate the concessioning of water wells
a. evaluate the optimum levels of water extraction
b. establish the permissible water extraction quotas
c. cancellation of illegal wells
Alternative C. Strengthen the oversight system of assigned quotas
a. cancellation of illegal wells
b. control water levels within the currently established quotas
i. establish a penalties system
c. allow the transfer of water quotas
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
34
activity 4.2 Promote the efficient use of water
two alternatives were formulated for activity 4.2 “Promote the efficient use of water”:
Alternative A. Conditioned use of subsidies for the purchase of equipment and infrastructure
a. establish an incentives system for the efficient use of water through a differentiated subsidy according to water savings
Alternative b. Substitute traditional irrigation systems with technified systems
a. subsidize the purchase of technified irrigation equipment
b. Provide training and technical assistance for the operation of technified irrigation equipment
output 5. Farm and aquaculture production units prevent contamination of water and soil through best practices of waste and input management
a C T I V I T I e s :
5.1 Implement an integral waste management system
5.2 Implement measures to reduce the use of agrochemicals
activity 5.1 implement an integral waste management system
there are two alternatives for activity 5.1 “implement an integral waste management system”:
Alternative A. Promote waste management practices according to the characteristics of producers
a. implement organic waste management programs. for example, production of compost, use of manure as organic fertilizer, installation of biodigestors, etc.
b. implement a program of integral inorganic waste management that includes the establishment of chemical waste disposal sites in rural areas
35Program and Project design
Alternative b. Implement industrial ecology practices in the agriculture and fishing sector
a. identify the main wastes generated in the primary sector
b. identify possibilities of use of such wastes
c. Provide training and technical assistance to rural economic Units (reU) for the identification of wastes generated at production farm units and the possibilities for use and exchange of such wastes with other reUs
d. implement an incentives system for producers that participate in the closing the material loop program in agriculture and fishing systems
activity 5.2 implement measures to reduce the use of agrochemicals
two alternatives were identified for activity 5.2 “implement measures to reduce the use of agrochemicals”:
Alternative A. Promote the use of organic fertilizer and pesticides
a. Provide training and technical assistance for the use of organic fertilizers and pesticides
Alternative b. Promote the development of organic agriculture
a. Provide training and technical assistance for the development of organic crops
b. implement compensatory schemes to encourage the transition from traditional to organic crops
c. grant support for the marketing of organic agricultural products
output 6: The generation of greenhouse gas emissions in the agriculture and fishing sector is reduced
a C T I V I T I e s :
6.1 Implement actions for carbon sequestration in the rural sector
6.2 Implement measures for the reduction of carbon emissions in agriculture and fishing activities
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
36
activity 6.1 implement actions for carbon sequestration in the rural sector
the following alternative is identified for activity 6.1 “implement actions for carbon sequestration in the rural sector”:
Alternative A. Incentivize actions to capture carbon in the rural sector
a. identification of the actions that permit carbon sequestration in the primary sector of the rural sector
b. establishment of incentives for the implementation of agro-forestry practices
c. Provide training and technical assistance on agro-forestry and adequate pasture management
d. Promotion of practices to increase the content of organic matter in farm soil
e. reforestation of areas with forestry potential
activity 6.2 implement measures for the reduction of carbon emissions in agriculture and fishing activities
two alternatives were identified for activity 6.2 “implement measures for the reduction of carbon emissions in agriculture and fishing activities”:
Alternative A. Promote activities for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions
a. identify low greenhouse gas emissions activities in the primary sector
b. Promote the use of bioenergy and renewable energy in farm and fishing units
c. implement training programs for the preparation and use of fertilizers and pesticides low in carbon
d. Provide training regarding the application of nitrogen fertilizer for its more efficient use and on application techniques to diminish emissions due to volatilization
e. Promote low carbon animal manure management systems
f. implement programs to prevent open burning in farm fields
Alternative b. Promote energy savings and efficiency in the agriculture and fishing sector
a. identify the main sources of energy consumption in the primary sector
b. substitution of high fossil fuel consumption equipment with more efficient equipment
c. implement cogeneration processes in farm units
d. eliminate government subsidies that incentivize the consumption of fossil fuels
e. Promote the use of animal manure for the generation of energy in the primary sector
37Program and Project design
fIg
uR
E 1
7. a
Lter
nat
ives
tr
ee (
Par
t 1)
fish
ing
reso
urce
s ar
e m
ade
use
of a
t a ra
te lo
wer
than
that
of
thei
r reg
ener
atio
n
nat
ura
l res
ourc
es a
re u
sed
su
stai
nab
ly in
th
e ru
ral a
nd
fish
ing
sect
or
reg
ulat
e sm
all
scal
e fis
hing
Use
of f
ishi
ng
gear
that
pr
even
ts
the
capt
ure
of ju
veni
le
orga
nism
s
enfo
rce
clos
ed
seas
ons
ado
pt
adeq
uate
tilla
ge
tech
niqu
es
app
ly m
easu
res
to e
nsur
e th
e st
ocki
ng r
ate
is m
aint
aine
d at
leve
ls th
at
prev
ent s
oil
com
pact
ion
impl
emen
t ac
tions
to
prev
ent t
he lo
ss
of p
lant
cov
er in
fa
rm p
rodu
ctio
n un
its
Soil
eros
ion
is c
ontr
olle
d
impl
emen
t a
syst
em o
f tr
ansf
erra
ble
fishi
ng q
uota
s ba
sed
on
biom
ass
limits
adj
ust t
he
num
ber o
f gr
anta
ble
perm
its
base
d on
the
capa
city
of
each
regi
on
buy
bac
k fis
hing
pe
rmits
subs
titut
e fis
hing
eq
uipm
ent
and
gear
trai
n fis
herm
en
stre
ngth
en
the
activ
ities
of
insp
ectio
n an
d ov
ersi
ght
impl
emen
t co
nser
vatio
n til
lage
Pro
mot
e cr
op r
otat
ion
and
crop
s in
ters
pers
ed
with
frui
t tr
ees
impl
emen
t ag
ro-f
ores
try
con
vers
ion
to c
rops
th
at fi
x so
il nu
tient
s
impl
emen
t be
st p
ract
ices
sy
stem
s in
gr
assl
and
man
agem
ent
Pro
mot
e th
e st
ablin
g of
liv
esto
ck
con
trol
the
expa
nsio
n of
fa
rm la
nd
rec
over
ab
ando
ned
farm
land
con
trol
the
expa
nsio
n of
fa
rm la
nd
impl
emen
t ac
tions
to
prev
ent t
he
use
of la
nd n
ot
apt f
or fa
rm
prod
uctio
n
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
38
fIg
uR
E 1
7. a
Lter
nat
ives
tr
ee (
Par
t 2)
nat
ura
l res
ourc
es a
re u
sed
su
stai
nab
ly in
th
e ru
ral a
nd
fish
ing
sect
or
Wat
er re
sour
ces
are
mad
e us
e of
mai
ntai
ning
a p
ositi
ve w
ater
ba
lanc
e
subs
idiz
e th
e pu
rcha
se o
f m
icro
-spr
ayin
g irr
igat
ion
syst
ems
Pro
vide
trai
ning
an
d te
chni
cal
assi
stan
ce
for t
he u
se
of te
chni
fied
irrig
atio
n
gra
nt s
ubsi
dies
to
car
ry o
ut
soil
was
hing
ac
tiviti
es
Pro
vide
trai
ning
an
d te
chni
cal
assi
stan
ce fo
r so
il w
ashi
ng
activ
ities
Pro
mot
e am
ong
prod
ucer
s ad
equa
te w
ater
dr
aina
ge
can
cel w
ater
us
e pe
rmits
in
aqui
fers
with
sa
liniz
atio
n pr
oble
ms
impl
emen
t al
tern
ativ
e sy
stem
s fo
r the
ca
ptur
e an
d us
e of
irrig
atio
n w
ater
trea
tmen
t of
salty
wat
ers
impl
emen
t a
syst
em
of o
ptim
al
irrig
atio
n qu
otas
reg
ulat
e th
e co
nces
sion
ing
of w
ater
wel
ls
stre
ngth
en
the
over
sigh
t sy
stem
of
assi
gned
qu
otas
con
ditio
ned
use
of
subs
idie
s fo
r th
e pu
rcha
se o
f eq
uipm
ent a
nd
infr
astr
uctu
re
sust
itute
tr
aditi
onal
irr
igat
ion
syst
ems
with
te
chni
fied
syst
ems
esta
blis
h m
easu
res
that
pr
even
t sal
t ac
cum
ulat
ion
reg
ulat
e th
e irr
igat
ion
syst
em
in th
e pr
imar
y se
ctor
Pro
mot
e th
e ef
ficie
nt u
se o
f w
ater
Soil
salin
izat
ion
is re
duce
d
esta
blis
hm
icro
-spr
inkl
er
irrig
atio
n sy
stem
s
Leac
h sa
lts
from
soi
l
39Program and Project design
fIg
uR
E 1
7. a
Lter
nat
ives
tr
ee (
Par
t 3)
nat
ura
l res
ourc
es a
re u
sed
su
stai
nab
ly in
th
e ru
ral a
nd
fish
ing
sect
or
The
gene
ratio
n of
gre
enho
use
gase
s in
the
agric
ultu
re s
ecto
r is
redu
ced
Pro
mot
e w
aste
m
anag
emen
t pr
actic
es a
ccor
ding
to
the
char
acte
ristic
s of
pr
oduc
ers
impl
emen
t an
inte
gral
w
aste
man
agem
ent
syst
em
farm
and
aqu
acul
ture
pro
duct
ion
units
pr
even
t con
tam
inat
ion
of w
ater
and
soi
l th
roug
h go
od p
ract
ices
of w
aste
and
in
put m
anag
emen
t
impl
emen
t ind
ustr
ial
ecol
ogy
prac
tices
in
the
agric
ultu
re a
nd
fishi
ng s
ecto
r
Pro
mot
e th
e us
e of
or
gani
c fe
rtili
zer a
nd
pest
icid
es
Pro
mot
e th
e de
velo
pmen
t of
orga
nic
agric
ultu
re
ince
ntiv
ize
actio
ns to
ca
ptur
e ca
rbon
in th
e ru
ral e
nviro
nmen
t
Pro
mot
e ac
tiviti
es
for t
he re
duct
ion
of
gree
nhou
se g
ase
emis
sion
s
Pro
mot
e en
ergy
sa
ving
s an
d ef
ficie
ncy
in th
e ag
ricul
ture
and
fis
hing
sec
tor
impl
emen
t mea
sure
s to
red
uce
the
use
of
agro
chem
ical
s
impl
emen
t ac
tions
for
carb
on
sequ
estr
atio
n in
the
rura
l sec
tor
impl
emen
t mea
sure
s fo
r th
e re
duct
ion
of c
arbo
n em
issi
ons
in a
gric
ultu
re
and
fishi
ng a
ctiv
ities
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
40
2.2 development of indicators of the budgetary programs in Mexico
in addition to objectives and alternatives, indicators are central to the design of a program or project. they measure the achievement of the objectives, the product of the outputs and the carrying out of the activities. in the case of mexico, the budgetary programs use the Logical framework, also called indicators matrix for results (imr)3.
as with the Logical framework, the imr includes the objectives of a program (narrative summary), the indicators, the means of verification and the assumptions or risks that could influence its success or failure.
with regard to the indicators of the imr, a performance indicator reference sheet is prepared which contains, among other things, the following elements4 for adequate monitoring and evaluation:
a. name of the indicator. this is the expression that identifies the indicator and which indicates what is to be measured with it.
b. Method of calculation. this refers to the algebraic expression of the indicator; that is, the simple explanation of the way in which the variables are related in order to calculate the indicator.
c. Direction of the indicator. this refers to the direction the behavior of the indicator should have in order to identify when its performance is positive or negative. it can have a rising or descending direction. when the direction is rising, the target will always be greater than the baseline value; thus, if the result is higher than planned this is indicative of good performance, and when it is lower it means a negative performance. when the direction is descending, the target will always be less than the baseline value, and therefore if the result is less than the planned target this is indicative of good performance, and when it is greater it indicates a negative performance.
d. frequency of measurement. this refers to the time frequency with which the measurement of the indicator is made (period between measurements).
e. unit of measure. this refers to the specific determination of the form in which the results of the measurement upon applying the indicator is to be expressed.
f. baseline. this is the initial value of the indicator that is taken as a reference to compare with the objective’s progress.
g. Target. a target allows for the establishment of limits or levels of achievement by indicating an expected level of performance. the target that is determined should be oriented toward significantly improving the results and impacts; that is, it should be ambitious but at the same time feasible to achieve; therefore, the target should be realistic with respect to the time period, and the human and financial resources involved.
h. Warning parameters. these identify whether or not the behavior of the indicator is adequate or according to expectations:
• acceptable (green)
• at risk (yellow)
• critical (red)
i. Means of verification. they identify sources of information in order to measure the indicators and verify that the objectives were met.
below there is an example of the identification of the basic elements of the indicators of sagarPa’s Program to support investment in equipment and infrastructure (table 5).
3 the imr is a tool that makes it possible to link the different instruments for the design, organization, execution, monitoring, evaluation, and improvement of the program, which is the result of a planning process done based on the Lfm.
4 this information was taken from the annexes of the official circular 307-a-1142 issued by the ministry of finance and Public credit (secretaría de hacienda y crédito Público) (shcP) of mexico in relation to the construction of the imr of the budgetary programs.
41Program and Project design
TAb
lE 5
. P
erfo
rm
an
ce
ind
icat
or
ref
eren
ce
shee
t o
f th
e im
r o
f sa
ga
rPa
’s P
ro
gr
am
to
sU
PP
or
t in
vest
men
t in
eQ
UiP
men
t a
nd
infr
ast
rU
ctU
re
obj
ectiv
e le
vel
nar
rativ
e
sum
mar
yn
ame
Met
hod
of
calc
ulat
ion
Dire
ctio
nfr
eque
ncy
of
mea
sure
men
t
uni
t of
mea
sure
men
t
bas
elin
eTa
rget
sTr
affic
Sig
nals
Mea
ns o
f
verif
icat
ion
Valu
eye
arCyc
le
targ
et
Targ
et to
year
201
2
gre
en-
yello
w
yello
w-
Red
goa
l
con
trib
ute
to
incr
easi
ng th
e
leve
l of i
ncom
e of
rura
l pro
duce
rs
and
fishe
rmen
thro
ugh
the
capi
taliz
atio
n of
thei
r eco
nom
ic
units
rat
e of
varia
tion
of re
al
net i
ncom
e of
rura
l pro
duce
rs
and
fishe
rmen
[(r
eal n
et in
com
e
of r
ural
pro
duce
rs
and
fishe
rmen
in
year
t0+
i / r
eal
net i
ncom
e of
rur
al
prod
ucer
s an
d
fishe
rmen
in y
ear
t 0) -1
]*10
0
ris
ing
trie
nnia
lP
erce
ntag
e
ave
rage
annu
al
inco
me
of
prod
ucer
s
in 2
008
:
65,1
88
peso
s
2008
not
appl
icab
le5%
±15%
±30
%
dat
abas
e of
bene
ficia
ries
surv
ey
Pur
pose
rur
al p
rodu
cers
and
fishe
rmen
incr
ease
the
leve
ls
of c
apita
lizat
ion
of th
eir e
cono
mic
units
Per
cent
age
of
incr
ease
of t
he
real
val
ue o
f
asse
ts in
rur
al
and
fishi
ng
econ
omic
uni
ts
[(r
eal v
alue
of
asse
ts in
rur
al a
nd
fishi
ng e
cono
mic
units
in y
ear t
0+i/
valu
e of
ass
ets
in
rura
l and
fish
ing
econ
omic
uni
ts in
year
t 0) -1
]*10
0
ris
ing
trie
nnia
lP
erce
ntag
e
ave
rage
valu
e of
prod
ucer
s’
asse
ts
in 2
008
:
19,2
29
peso
s
2008
not
appl
icab
le5%
±15%
±30
%
dat
abas
e of
bene
ficia
ries
surv
ey
out
put 1
Pro
duct
ion
infr
astr
uctu
re
avai
labl
e fo
r
prod
uctio
n un
its’
rura
l and
fish
ing
proj
ects
Per
cent
age
of r
ural
and
fishi
ng
econ
omic
uni
ts
with
pro
duct
ion
infr
astr
uctu
re
avai
labl
e
(num
ber o
f
rura
l and
fish
ing
econ
omic
uni
ts
endo
wed
with
prod
uctio
n
infr
astr
uctu
re /
tota
l
num
ber o
f rur
al a
nd
fishi
ng e
cono
mic
units
) * 1
00
ris
ing
ann
ual
Per
cent
age
36.8
%20
084
4.36
%4
4.4%
±10%
±20
%
cer
tific
ates
of
clos
ing
and
settl
emen
ts
stor
ed in
the
adm
inis
trat
ive
info
rmat
ion
syst
em
Co
nti
nu
ed
on
nex
t p
age
>
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
42
obj
ectiv
e le
vel
nar
rativ
e
sum
mar
yn
ame
Met
hod
of
calc
ulat
ion
Dire
ctio
nfr
eque
ncy
of
mea
sure
men
t
uni
t of
mea
sure
men
t
bas
elin
eTa
rget
sTr
affic
Sig
nals
Mea
ns o
f
verif
icat
ion
Valu
eye
arCyc
le
targ
et
Targ
et to
year
201
2
gre
en-
yello
w
yello
w-
Red
out
put 2
mac
hine
ry a
nd
equi
pmen
t
avai
labl
e fo
r
prod
uctio
n un
its’
rura
l and
fish
ing
proj
ects
Per
cent
age
of r
ural
and
fishi
ng
econ
omic
uni
ts
with
mac
hine
ry
and
equi
pmen
t
(num
ber o
f
rura
l and
fish
ing
econ
omic
uni
ts
endo
wed
with
mac
hine
ry a
nd
equi
pmen
t / t
otal
num
ber o
f rur
al a
nd
fishi
ng e
cono
mic
units
) * 1
00
ris
ing
ann
ual
Per
cent
age
36.6
%20
0826
.33%
26.4
%±1
0%±
20%
cer
tific
ates
of
clos
ing
and
settl
emen
ts
stor
ed in
the
adm
inis
trat
ive
info
rmat
ion
syst
em
out
put 3
impr
oved
gen
etic
mat
eria
l ava
ilabl
e
for g
reat
er
effic
ienc
y of
prod
uctio
n un
its
Per
cent
age
of r
ural
and
fishi
ng
econ
omic
uni
ts
with
impr
oved
gene
tic m
ater
ial
(num
ber o
f
rura
l and
fish
ing
econ
omic
uni
ts w
ith
impr
oved
gen
etic
mat
eria
l / t
otal
num
ber o
f rur
al a
nd
fishi
ng e
cono
mic
units
) * 1
00
ris
ing
ann
ual
Per
cent
age
26.6
1%20
0829
.31%
29.4
%±1
0%±
20%
cer
tific
ates
of
clos
ing
and
settl
emen
ts
stor
ed in
the
adm
inis
trat
ive
info
rmat
ion
syst
em
Sour
ce: D
ata
obta
ined
from
the
IMR
of t
he P
rogr
am to
Sup
port
Inve
stm
ent i
n Eq
uipm
ent a
nd In
fras
truc
ture
201
1 by
the
Mex
ican
Min
istr
y of
Agr
icul
ture
(SA
GA
RP
A).
The
orig
inal
IMR
con
tain
ed
indi
ctor
s th
at w
ere
not i
nclu
ded
in th
is m
atrix
due
to th
e fa
ct th
at c
erta
in d
ata
wer
e m
issi
ng, s
uch
as th
e so
urce
of v
erifi
catio
n, th
e ba
selin
e va
lue
or it
invo
lved
indi
cato
rs th
at c
anno
t be
mon
itore
d.
43Program and Project design
2.3 Baseline study of sagaRPa Programs
the baseline study of the sagarPa Programs was conducted in order to have baseline data that would make it possible to evaluate the effects of the Programs on the target population to which they are addressed. according to the rules of operation of sagarPa Programs, the target population is composed of “the individuals or entities that, individually or collectively, engage in agricultural, livestock, fishing, aquaculture, agroindustrial, and any other rural activities”5.
the baseline study was conducted, independently, in 31 of the 32 states of the mexican republic in order to be representative at that level, and subsequently each of the state databases was integrated into a national database.
for the collection of data in the field, the same sampling design and survey methodology was applied in the 31 states to obtain the data necessary for the calculation of the baseline indicators.
a) SAMPlE DESIgn
Step 1: Construction of the sampling frame
the sampling design began with the construction of the sampling frame, which was developed in each state by using beneficiary lists of federal and state programs, producer registries, and administrative registries such as the national fishing registry, as well as any other list related to rural and fishing activities.
5 sagarPa. rules of operation for the sagarPa 2008, 2009, and 2010 Programs.
TAblE 6. PotentiaL PoPULation and target PoPULation
the potential population corresponds to the total population that presents the need and/or
problem and that justifies the design of a program or project. however, due to financial or time
restrictions that do not permit benefiting all of such population, it becomes necessary to make a
distinction between the potential population and the target population.
the target population is a subgroup of the potential population on which attention is focused.
For example, for the Program for the sustainability of natural Resources, which provides support
and services to develop projects promoting an appropriate use of natural resources, the target
population entitled to receive such support is defined as “the individuals or entities that engage
in agriculture and livestock production activities that are located in the municipalities classified as
the greatest priority based on the degree of deterioration, scarcity or overexploitation of productive
resources”.
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
44
based on the analysis of compiled data, three subpopulations of rural economic Units6 (reU) were identified. these
were:
i. Ne: rural economic Units that had the information to be classified in strata7.
ii. Nne: rural economic Units that did not have sufficient information to be stratified.
iii. Nnl: rural economic Units about which there was no information at all but there was knowledge about their
existence based on previous information provided by the national survey on occupation and employment
(enoe).
hence, the universe of the programs’ target population was formed from the sum of the three subpopulations:
N = Ne + Nne + Nnl
in total, 5,424,430 rural economic Units were counted, of which 3,919,639 (72.2%) were stratified, 649,333 (12.0%)
were not possible to stratify, and 855,458 (15.8%) were not possible to list. more details are available in annex 1.
once the sampling frame was constructed, the next step was to determine the sampling design for each type of
subpopulation.
i) SAMPlIng DESIgn foR ThE SubPoPulATIon of STRATIfIAblE REus (Ne )
for the subpopulation of stratifiable reUs a random stratified sampling (rss) was used. subsequently, a simple
random sampling (srs) was applied to each stratus independently. to obtain the sampling frame for each stratus (ni),
the reUs were considered according to the degree of territorial marginalization where they are located (high/very high,
medium, and low/very low) and the level of farm assets (low, medium and high), thereby forming nine strata (table 7).
6 a reU is defined, according to the rules of operation of sagaraPa Programs, as the individual or entity, whether or not tied to land, that engages in agricultural, fishing or other production, industrial or services activities in the rural sector.
7 the strata were classified according to the farm assets they had and the degree of marginalization.
TAblE 7. strata in which the target PoPULation was cLassified
stratalevel of assets
low Medium High
degree of marginality of
the locality
high/ very high e11 e12 e13
Medium e21 e22 e23
low/ very low e31 e32 e33
Source: FAO. Guía metodológica para el levantamiento de la línea de base de los Programas de la SAGARPA.
45Program and Project design
once the strata were defined, the sample size of each stratus on which the baseline was conducted was determined using the following formula:
where:
ne = size of the sample for the group ne
Ne = number of units of the subpopulation composed of stratifiable reUs
Nij = number of units of the target population of stratus ij (population size of each stratus).
sij2 = variance of stratus ij (estimated based on income data taking as a source the evaluation of alianza para el campo
2006)
V = d 2/Z 2 α/2
d = margin of error (each state could apply a margin of error between 0.03 and 0.11)
Z 2 α/2 = value of tables for a certain confidence level (each state determined its own level of confidence, oscillating between 0.90 and 0.97)
k = number of strata: 9
once the sample size (ne ) was obtained for this subpopulation in each state, the assignment of sample size by stratus (nij ) was done using the Optimum Assignment procedure; that is, more units were selected in the groups of greater variability; the formula used was the following:
where Nij and sij were already previously defined.
for stratifiable reUs, annex 2 presents the sample size for each stratus for all states. nationally there was a total of 20,753 sampling reUs for this subpopulation.
ii) SAMPlIng DESIgn foR ThE SubPoPulATIon of non-STRATIfIAblE REus (Nne )
for the subpopulation of non-stratifiable reUs (Nne ) the simple random sampling (srs) was applied. in this way it was guaranteed that 12.0% of the reU that were in this situation at the national level had the same probability of being selected. the state sample size for this group of reUs (Nne) was determined by using the following formula:
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
46
where nne represents the state sample size for non-stratifiable reUs; and Ne and ne correspond to the variables as defined previously.
annex 3 presents the sample size results by state for the non-stratifiable subpopulation. nationally, there was a total sample of 3,360 reUs for this listed subpopulation, but with not enough data to be classified as stratifiable.
iii) SAMPlIng DESIgn foR ThE SubPoPulATIon of non-lISTED REus (Nnl )
for the subpopulation of non-listed reUs (Nnl ) the systematic sampling method was applied. this subpopulation represented 15.7% of the target population. the sample size for this subpopulation was obtained by using the following formula:
where nnl represents the sample size for the non-listed units (Nnl ).
annex 4 presents the sample size results by state for the non-listed subpopulation. nationally, the sample for this subpopulation reached 2,214 reUs. finally, the sample size (n) for each state resulted from the summation of three subsamples:
n = ne + nne + nnl
n = 20,753 + 3,360 + 2,214 n = 26,327
Step 2: Sample selection
the third and last step consisted of selecting the sample units of each subpopulation. as for the listed subpopulations (stratifiable and non-stratifiable) the procedure was the same, while for the non-listed subpopulation a different method was used.
i) PRoCEDuRE foR SElECTIng ThE SAMPlIng unITS of lISTED SubPoPulATIonS
once the sample sizes ne and nne were determined for each state, the sample units to be surveyed were selected systematically. for example, in the case of the subpopulation of stratifiable reUs the following was done:
1. the list of heads of reU was put in alphabetical order by last name and numbered progressively.
2. a coefficient k was then calculated, which resulted from dividing the total number of the target population of each stratus by the sample size calculated for such stratus. the coefficient k is a partition that is required in the systematic selection of a sample:
47Program and Project design
the value of k is not rounded off, such that if it is multiplied by the sample size the size of the population is obtained. with this procedure, as many partitions as are required are generated in the population according to the sample size. from each of these partitions one element was selected.
3. a number s was randomly selected from the closed interval between 1 and k8.
4. from the number s, a direct and systematic selection was initiated, within the sampling framework, of the target population to be surveyed, such that the selected units were those resulting from rounding off each one of the following numbers separately: s, s+k, s+2k, s+3k, s+4k, … until completing the nij sample units9.
the inclusion of the random number s in the pattern s, s+k, s+2k, s+3k, s+4k, … guarantees equal probability of selection for the entire population. in this way it is possible to obtain a sample with behavior similar to that of a simple random sample, with the advantage that the systematic sampling makes it possible to verify the sample selection10.
ii) PRoCEDuRE foR SElECTIng ThE SAMPlE unITS of ThE non-lISTED SubPoPulATIon
the procedure for obtaining the members of the sample nnl could be carried out with two different methodologies: systematic sampling or snowball sampling.
Systematic sampling
1. in each state all the rural localities that had never had access to the sagarPa Programs were listed (crossing the list of localities obtained from the registry of beneficiaries against the list of localities by state according to the 2007 agriculture, Livestock and forestry census).
2. the ejidal commissary, representative of the locality, or any other source of authorized information was contacted to obtain an alphabetical list of the existing reUs.
3. k= (Nnl ) / (nnl ) was calculated.
4. a number s was selected randomly from the closed interval between 1 and k.
5. Parting from the number s, a direct and systematic selection was initiated, within the list of reUs obtained through step 2, such that the units being selected were those resulting from separately rounding off each one of the following numbers: s, s+k, s+2k, s+3k, s+4k, … until the nnl sampling units were completed.
Snowball sampling
the snowball sampling method is appropriate in situations in which the elements that make up the sampling framework are not known, but their existence is known although they are not listed in any registry.
the application of this sampling method consists of:
1. identifying and preparing a list of all rural localities that have not been reached by the governmental programs;
2. making a random selection of these localities in order to determine where the survey would be applied.
8 this operation can be carried out with the help of a spreadsheet like excel.
9 numbers with decimals greater than or equal to 0.5 are rounded to the whole number immediately above. numbers with decimals less than 0.5 are rounded to the whole number immediately below.
10 in the event that the support of the Programs had been granted to groups, the members of the groups became part of the sampling framework on which the design was applied.
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
48
in each locality selected, the first reUs are located and interviewed (with the help of the local authorities). these initial interviewees are asked to name other elements of the target population (generally other reUs of the same locality) to be interviewed, who in turn name other reUs for interview. the process continues until the required sample size for this subpopulation is met.
b) QuESTIonnAIRE DESIgn
the instrument that was designed for gathering field data consisted of a questionnaire, which was structured to collect data that allows for the calculation of indicators. the questionnaire structure is shown in table 8. the questionnaire itself is presented as tool 1 in this document.
MoDulE PRInCIPAl ToPIC
i identification of the interviewee age, gender, level of schooling, size of family, principal activity.
ii rural economic unit Land tenure and source of moisture, agricultural activities, livestock activities, aquaculture activities, fishing activities, transformed or processed products.
iii other income remittances, etc.
iv governmental aid aid received from development programs.
v financial services Loan institutions, loan amounts and use of the loans.
vi agro-food and fishing information access to and use of information for production decision making.
vii satisfaction of the beneficiary satisfaction of the beneficiaries with the program and the aid received.
viii complementary questions other questions of interest.
Source: Instrumentos y guía metodológica para el levantamiento de la línea de base de los Programas 2008 de SAGARPA.
to ensure the quality of data collected, care was taken that the questionnaire had the following attributes: pertinence of the questions (correct technical formulation), language used (simplicity, precision, fluidity), consistency (coherence among topics and questions), and extension (length of the interview).
conducting a baseline study is extremely important because it makes it possible to measure the results and impacts of a program or project. through the baseline, information is revealed for measuring the effectiveness and determining the continuation, modification or conclusion of the policy instruments that are being implemented. hence, the process carried out to collect field information for the baseline was indispensable for calculating the indicators established in each of the sagarPa Programs.
TAblE 8. QUestionnaire strUctUre for condUcting the baseLine stUdy of the sagarPa Programs
49Program and Project design
S u m m a r y
the design is the second stage of a program or project cycle. it begins with the analysis of objectives and ends with the construction of the Logical framework. the first step consists of preparing an objectives tree based on the analysis of the problem tree (prepared in the diagnostic stage). the objectives tree is a logical representation of the desired situation to be reached through an intervention, and the means that are required to achieve it. these means are analyzed to identify the most convenient strategy in terms of relevance, efficiency, efficacy, financial viability, institutional viability, and environmental impact in the analysis of alternatives.
from the selection of the best alternatives the activities that would make it possible to produce the outputs are determined. the outputs, in turn, lead to the achievement of the Purpose which in itself contributes to the goal. the coherent relationship among these four levels of objectives is known as vertical logic.
subsequently, the indicators and means of verification are defined. these elements are inseparable from the objectives, since it is based on these that performance of a project can be measured and its effectiveness determined. the coherent concurrence of these three elements constitutes the horizontal logic or coherence among objective, indicator and means of verification.
the final step is to determine the important assumptions or premises on which the implementation of a program or project rests, and the realization of which constitutes a condition for advancing towards the achievement of the next objective level. this is known as diagonal logic.
this series of analytical steps utilizing logical methods is synthesized in the Logical framework, which is an instrument that contains the most important elements that make up a program or project.
the use of the Logical framework method in the development of this stage is very important. among other advantages, this method impedes the existence of multiple objectives in a project or program, or the inclusion of activities that do not lead to achieving the objective. in addition, it leads to clearly defined mechanisms for the adequate implementation and monitoring of the program or project.
finally, it is in this stage that the baseline or base measurement of the project or program indicators is conducted. this stage is carried out before the start of the program’s implementation, since it constitutes the point of reference upon which the progress of a program or project towards the achievement of the objectives is determined.
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
50
51Program and Project design
tools4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
III
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
52
Too
l 1
Qu
esti
onn
aire
for
the
bas
elin
e of
th
e ru
ral a
nd
fish
ing
sect
or p
rogr
ams
inte
rvie
w d
ate
day
mon
thye
ar
QU
esti
on
na
ire
nU
mb
er
QU
esti
on
na
ire
co
de
nam
ec
ode
stat
e1•
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
•
mun
icip
ality
2•
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
•
Loca
lity3
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
1/ s
ee t
able
of s
tate
s.
2/ s
ee t
able
of m
unic
ipal
ities
.
3/ s
ee t
able
of l
ocal
ities
.
nam
e of
inte
rvie
wer
:•
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
nam
e(s)
firs
t las
t nam
ese
cond
last
nam
e
53Program and Project design
beg
inn
ing
OF
THe
in
Ter
VieW
goo
d m
orni
ng-a
fter
noon
-eve
ning
, i b
elon
g to
a te
am o
f int
ervi
ewer
s w
ho a
re g
athe
ring
data
to e
valu
ate
the
rura
l and
fis
hing
sec
tor
prog
ram
s. w
ith th
is q
uest
ionn
aire
it
is in
tend
ed to
col
lect
dat
a on
pro
duct
ion
activ
ities
car
ried
out b
y pr
oduc
ers
and
the
oper
atio
n of
aid
pro
gram
s, in
ord
er to
rev
ise
and
impr
ove
thei
r pe
rfor
man
ce. f
or
thes
e pu
rpos
es, i
kin
dly
ask
you
to g
ive
me
a fe
w m
inut
es o
f you
r tim
e to
ans
wer
the
follo
win
g qu
estio
ns. t
he in
form
atio
n yo
u pr
ovid
e m
e w
ill b
e ke
pt c
onfid
entia
l and
w
ill b
e us
ed e
xclu
sive
ly fo
r pr
ogra
m e
valu
atio
n.
I. Id
entif
icat
ion
of t
he in
terv
iew
ee
a) W
hat
is y
our
nam
e?•
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
•
(ref
ers
to th
e pe
rson
to b
e in
terv
iew
ed a
nd c
an b
e pr
imar
y pr
oduc
ers,
pro
cess
ors,
mar
kete
rs o
r ot
hers
).n
ame(
s)fi
rst l
ast n
ame
seco
nd la
st n
ame
b) n
ame
of in
form
ant:
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
(if t
he p
erso
n se
lect
ed fo
r th
e ap
plic
atio
n of
the
ques
tionn
aire
is n
ot a
vaila
ble,
rec
ord
the
nam
e of
the
info
rman
t).
nam
e(s)
firs
t las
t nam
ese
cond
last
nam
e
c) W
hat
is y
our
addr
ess?
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
•
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
•
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
•
d)
Whe
re is
you
r un
it of
pro
duct
ion
loca
ted?
stre
et o
r an
othe
r re
fere
nce
e
xter
ior
num
ber
in
terio
r nu
mbe
r•
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
•
Loca
lity
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
mun
icip
ality
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
stat
e
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
c
olon
ia, d
evel
opm
ent,
unit
or b
arrio
Loc
ality
mun
icip
ality
stat
ec
ode
cod
ec
ode
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
see
loca
litie
s ta
ble
see
mun
icip
aliti
es t
able
see
stat
es t
able
e) I
nter
view
er: th
e in
terv
iew
ee1 is
:M
an
Wom
an1
/ ref
ers
to th
e pe
rson
sel
ecte
d fo
r th
e ap
plic
atio
n of
the
ques
tionn
aire
, not
the
info
rman
t. a
sk o
nly
whe
n th
e pe
rson
sel
ecte
d is
not
ava
ilabl
e.
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
54
f) h
ow o
ld a
re y
ou?
•••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
•
ye
ars
old.
g) W
hat
was
the
last
yea
r or
gra
de o
f sc
hool
you
com
plet
ed?
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
non
e
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
of p
rimar
y
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
of s
econ
dary
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
of h
igh
scho
ol
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
of te
chni
cal s
choo
l stu
dies
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
of u
nive
rsity
stu
dies
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
••
of g
radu
ate
stud
ies
Inte
rvie
wer
: h)
Doe
s th
e in
terv
iew
ee s
peak
Spa
nish
?
yes:
(1)
no:
(0)
i)
Doe
s th
e in
terv
iew
ee s
peak
an
indi
geno
us la
ngua
ge?
yes:
(1)
no:
(0)
j) h
ow m
any
pers
ons
depe
nd o
n yo
u ec
onom
ical
ly?
num
ber
of
pers
ons
------
------
------
---o
f the
se p
erso
ns:
how
man
y ar
e un
der
14 y
ears
old
?---
------
------
------
how
man
y ar
e 14
yea
rs o
ld o
r ol
der?
------
------
------
---
55Program and Project design
k) I
n w
hat
prod
uctio
n ac
tivit
y(ie
s) d
o yo
u en
gage
mai
nly?
1
(I
nter
view
er: W
hate
ver
the
activ
ity(ie
s) th
e pr
oduc
er e
ngag
es in
, als
o as
k th
e qu
estio
n in
the
follo
win
g su
bsec
tion
l).
agr
icul
ture
____
___
fore
stry
and
/or
gath
erin
g5__
____
_
Live
stoc
k
aqu
acul
ture
2
____
___
____
___
non
-agr
icul
tura
l rur
al a
ctiv
ities
6 :
gro
cerie
s__
____
_
fish
ing3
____
___
bak
ery
____
___
Pro
cess
ing
of p
rimar
y pr
oduc
ts4
__
____
_
to
rtill
a m
aker
____
___
oth
er__
____
_
1/ m
ark
with
an
x th
e th
ree
mai
n ac
tiviti
es a
ccor
ding
to th
eir
impo
rtan
ce fo
r in
com
e ge
nera
tion
in th
e ag
ricul
tura
l yea
r 20
10.
the
agri
cult
ural
yea
r 20
10 is
the
perio
d fr
om a
pril
2010
to m
arch
201
1.2
/ if t
he in
terv
iew
ee o
nLy
eng
ages
in a
quac
ultu
re, a
pply
que
stio
n l,
1,2
and
skip
to q
uest
ion
45.
3/ i
f the
inte
rvie
wee
on
Ly e
ngag
es in
fish
ing,
ski
p to
que
stio
n l a
nd th
en to
que
stio
n 5
3.4
/ if t
he in
terv
iew
ee o
nLy
eng
ages
in th
e pr
oces
sing
of p
rodu
cts,
ski
p to
que
stio
n l a
nd th
en to
que
stio
n 61
.5
/ if t
he in
terv
iew
ee o
nLy
eng
ages
in fo
rest
ry a
nd/o
r ga
ther
ing,
ask
que
stio
n l,
1,2
and
skip
to q
uest
ion
71.
6/ i
f the
inte
rvie
wee
on
Ly e
ngag
es in
non
-agr
icul
tura
l rur
al a
ctiv
ities
, ski
p to
que
stio
n 74
.
l) D
o yo
u be
long
to
any
econ
omic
org
aniz
atio
n of
pro
duce
rs?
n
o. o
fm
embe
rs
no
(indi
vidu
al p
rodu
cer)
: (0)
yes,
but
car
ries
out h
is/h
er p
rodu
ctio
n ac
tiviti
es in
divi
dual
ly:
yes,
and
car
ries
out h
is/h
er p
rodu
ctio
n ac
tiviti
es c
olle
ctiv
ely
with
the
othe
r pa
rtne
rs (a
s if
a si
ngle
reU
1 ): 1
/ reU
: rur
al e
cono
mic
Uni
t.
Inte
rvie
wer
: If
the
inte
rvie
wee
bel
ongs
to
an e
cono
mic
org
aniz
atio
n of
pro
duce
rs, co
rrec
tly id
entif
y th
e R
Eu a
nd a
sk t
he f
ollo
win
g qu
estio
ns o
f th
e qu
estio
nnai
re r
egar
ding
tha
t R
Eu.
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
56
II. R
ural
eco
nom
ic u
nit
2.1
Land
tenu
re a
nd s
ourc
e of
moi
stur
e
1. o
f th
e to
tal l
and
area
tha
t yo
u us
e in
you
r pr
oduc
tion
unit
how
muc
h la
nd a
rea…
Uni
t of m
easu
rem
ent1
1.is
you
rs?
____
____
____
____
____
___
2.is
ren
ted,
sha
recr
oppe
d, lo
aned
or
owne
d in
ano
ther
form
?__
____
____
____
____
____
_
1
/ rec
ord
the
code
acc
ordi
ng to
the
units
of m
easu
rem
ent t
able
.
2. o
f th
e to
tal l
and…
that
you
ow
n, h
ow
muc
h la
nd a
rea
is…
Uni
t of
mea
sure
men
t11
that
is r
ente
d, s
hare
crop
ped
or o
wne
d in
ano
ther
form
, how
muc
h la
nd a
rea
is…
Uni
t of
mea
sure
men
t1
1.irr
igat
ed?
2.ra
in-f
ed?
3.of
res
idua
l moi
stur
e?
4.hi
ll or
mou
ntai
n pa
stur
e?
5.gr
eenh
ouse
2?
6.fo
rest
?
7.an
othe
r ty
pe?
1/ r
ecor
d th
e co
de a
ccor
ding
the
units
of m
easu
rem
ent t
able
.2
/ thi
s ca
tego
ry s
houl
d in
clud
e gr
eenh
ouse
s, n
urse
ries,
sha
de c
over
(sh
adin
g la
ttic
e), m
acro
-tun
nels
, an
d ot
her
agric
ultu
ral s
yste
ms
unde
r w
eath
er c
ontr
ol. i
f on
Ly th
is o
ptio
n w
as s
elec
ted,
ski
p to
que
stio
n 3
and
then
to q
uest
ion
11.
Inte
rvie
wer
: If
the
inte
rvie
wee
eng
ages
in a
gric
ultu
ral p
rodu
ctio
n, s
kip
to q
uest
ion
3; if
he/
she
enga
ges
in li
vest
ock
prod
uctio
n sk
ip t
o qu
estio
n 18
.
2.2
agr
icul
tura
l act
iviti
es
3. I
n th
e 20
10 a
gric
ultu
ral y
ear,
as a
res
ult
of y
our
agric
ultu
ral a
ctiv
ities
, yo
u pr
oduc
ed…
onl
y pr
imar
y pr
oduc
ts (w
ithou
t tra
nsfo
rmin
g or
pro
cess
ing)
?P
rimar
y pr
oduc
ts a
nd tr
ansf
orm
ed o
r pr
oces
sed
prod
ucts
?1
1/ i
n th
is c
ase
appl
y th
e qu
estio
n of
this
sec
tion
(2.2
) an
d se
ctio
n 2.
6 tr
ansf
orm
ed o
r pr
oces
sed
prod
ucts
.
57Program and Project design
2.2.
1 a
nnua
l cro
ps
4. I
n th
e 20
10 a
gric
ultu
ral y
ear,
did
you
grow
any
cro
p th
at la
sts
less
tha
n on
e ye
ar?
yes:
(1)
no:
(0)
if
no,
ski
p to
que
stio
n 7.
5. I
n th
e 20
10 a
gric
ultu
ral y
ear,
in y
our
agric
ultu
ral a
ctiv
ity…
wha
t cr
ops
did
you
grow
, be
ginn
ing
with
the
m
ain
one?
1
Cod
e2
the
crop
s w
ere
of
the
cycl
e…w
ere
they
in
com
pani
on
plan
ting?
3
how
muc
h la
nd a
rea
did
you
plan
t?
how
muc
h la
nd a
rea
was
mec
hani
zed?
how
muc
h w
as the
tota
l pro
duct
ion?
of y
our t
otal
pro
duct
ion5 …
at w
hat p
rice
did
you
sell
your
ha
rves
t…(lo
cal c
urre
ncy/
unit
of m
easu
rem
ent7 )
of y
our s
ubpr
oduc
ts, b
ypro
duct
s an
d/or
stu
bble
…
how
muc
h di
d yo
u se
ll…
how
muc
h di
d yo
u co
nsum
e pe
rson
ally
ss?
fw
?a
mou
ntU
nit o
f m
easu
rem
ent4
am
ount
Uni
t of
mea
sure
men
t4a
mou
ntU
nit o
f m
easu
rem
ent4
in th
e co
untr
y?ab
road
?fo
r the
fa
mily
(fo
od)?
6
for
prod
uctio
n (in
puts
)?
in th
e co
untr
y?ab
road
?
how
m
uch
did
you
sell?
Uni
t of
mea
sure
men
t4
at w
hat p
rice?
(loca
l cur
renc
y/un
it of
m
easu
rem
ent)
1. 2. 3. 4 5.
1/ i
f the
inte
rvie
wee
gro
ws
crop
s in
com
pani
on p
lant
ing
(on
the
sam
e la
nd)
reco
rd o
n se
para
te li
nes
the
info
rmat
ion
for
each
cro
p.th
e pr
inci
pal c
rop
refe
rs to
the
one
that
gen
erat
es th
e gr
eate
st in
com
e fo
r hi
m/h
er in
his
/her
uni
t of p
rodu
ctio
n.2
/ see
cro
ps t
able
.3
/ mar
k w
ith a
n x
in th
e ca
se o
f cro
ps g
row
n in
com
pani
on p
lant
ing.
4/ r
ecor
d th
e co
de a
ccor
ding
to th
e un
its o
f mea
sure
men
t tab
le.
5/ i
n th
ese
colu
mns
the
info
rmat
ion
shou
ld b
e re
cord
ed u
sing
the
sam
e un
it of
mea
sure
men
t as
used
for
the
tota
l pro
duct
ion
(pre
viou
s co
lum
n); i
f app
licab
le, t
he c
orre
spon
ding
con
vers
ion
shou
ld b
e m
ade.
6/ i
f he/
she
has
not s
old
his/
her
prod
uctio
n an
d it
has
been
use
d fo
r fa
mily
con
sum
ptio
n, a
sk th
e pr
ice
in
the
loca
lity
or r
egio
n of
the
prod
uct p
laci
ng it
in th
e sp
ace
corr
espo
ndin
g to
pric
e in
the
coun
try.
7/ U
se th
e sa
me
unit
of m
easu
rem
ent r
ecor
ded
in to
tal p
rodu
ctio
n.
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
58
6. I
n th
e 20
10 a
gric
ultu
ral y
ear,
wha
t w
ere
the
cost
s of
pro
duct
ion
of y
our
crop
s?1
(Int
ervi
ewer
: K
eep
the
sam
e or
der
of c
rops
as
in q
uest
ion
5)
Cro
p2C
ode3
If y
ou r
ente
d la
nd t
o pr
oduc
e…In
the
pre
para
tion
of
the
land
, ho
w m
any
hect
ares
…In
the
pla
ntin
g…
how
man
y he
ctar
es
did
you
rent
?
how
muc
h di
d yo
u pa
y pe
r he
ctar
e?
wer
e de
ep
tille
d?
how
m
uch
did
it co
st p
er
hect
are?
wer
e lig
htly
pl
owed
?
how
m
uch
did
it co
st p
er
hect
are?
wer
e pl
owed
?
how
m
uch
did
it co
st p
er
hect
are?
wer
e le
vele
d?
how
muc
h di
d it
cost
per
he
ctar
e?
how
muc
h se
ed4
did
you
use
per
hect
are?
Uni
t of
mea
sure
men
t5
wha
t was
the
pric
e of
the
seed
per
uni
t of
mea
sure
men
t?
how
muc
h di
d it
cost
yo
u to
pla
nt
(exc
ludi
ng
the
seed
) pe
r he
ctar
e?6
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Que
stio
n 6
con
tinue
d… (I
nter
view
er:
Kee
p th
e sa
me
orde
r of
cro
ps)
Cro
p C
ode3
If y
ou a
pplie
d fe
rtili
zers
…If
you
did
cro
p ca
re o
pera
tion
s (h
oein
g, w
eedi
ng,
hilli
ng o
r ot
hers
)…
on h
ow m
any
hect
ares
did
yo
u ap
ply
it?
how
muc
h fe
rtili
zer
did
you
use
per
hect
are?
Uni
t of
mea
sure
men
t5
how
muc
h di
d th
e fe
rtili
zer
cost
yo
u pe
r un
it of
m
easu
rem
ent?
how
muc
h di
d th
e ap
plic
atio
n of
fert
ilize
rs
cost
you
per
hec
tare
?
on h
ow m
any
hect
ares
did
you
w
ork?
how
muc
h di
d it
cost
yo
u pe
r he
ctar
e?ho
w m
any
times
did
yo
u do
it?
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
59Program and Project design
Que
stio
n 6
con
tinue
d… (I
nter
view
er:
Kee
p th
e sa
me
orde
r of
cro
ps)
Cro
p C
ode3
If y
ou d
id w
eed
cont
rol…
If y
ou d
id p
est
and/
or d
isea
se c
ontr
ol…
che
mic
al c
ontr
ol:
man
ual c
ontr
ol:
on h
ow
man
y he
ctar
es d
id
you
appl
y pe
stic
ides
an
d/or
fu
ngic
ides
?
wha
t am
ount
of
pest
icid
es
and/
or
fung
icid
es
did
you
use
per
hect
are?
Uni
t of
mea
sure
men
t5
how
muc
h di
d th
e pr
oduc
ts
appl
ied
cost
pe
r un
it of
m
easu
rem
ent?
how
muc
h di
d th
e ap
plic
atio
n of
the
prod
ucts
co
st p
er
hect
are?
on h
ow
man
y he
ctar
es d
id
you
appl
y he
rbic
ides
?
wha
t am
ount
of
herb
icid
e di
d yo
u us
e pe
r he
ctar
e?
Uni
t of
mea
sure
men
t5
how
muc
h di
d th
e he
rbic
ide
cost
you
pe
r un
it of
m
easu
rem
ent?
how
muc
h di
d th
e ap
plic
atio
n of
the
prod
uct
cost
you
per
he
ctar
e?
on h
ow
man
y he
ctar
es
did
you
do
man
ual
cont
rol?
how
m
uch
did
it co
st
you
per
hect
are?
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Que
stio
n 6
con
tinue
d… (I
nter
view
er:
Kee
p th
e sa
me
orde
r of
cro
ps)
Cro
pC
ode3
If y
ou a
pplie
d ir
riga
tion
…
how
muc
h la
nd a
rea
did
you
irrig
ate?
if yo
u ho
ld7
the
right
s fo
r th
e us
e of
wat
er …
if yo
u ar
e no
t the
hol
der
of th
e w
ater
use
rig
hts,
ho
w m
uch
did
it co
st
you
to ir
rigat
e?
on
how
man
y he
ctar
es d
id y
ou a
pply
som
e of
the
follo
win
g ty
pes
of ir
rigat
ion?
how
muc
h di
d yo
u pa
y fo
r th
e us
e of
ele
ctric
ity fo
r irr
igat
ion?
how
muc
h di
d it
cost
yo
u to
irrig
ate
your
cr
ops
(use
rig
hts,
la
bor
or o
ther
s)?
ear
then
ca
nals
Line
d ca
nals
can
nons
sprin
kler
sy
stem
mic
ro-s
prin
kler
sy
stem
drip
sy
stem
oth
er
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
60
Que
stio
n 6
con
clud
ed…
(Int
ervi
ewer
: K
eep
the
sam
e or
der
of c
rops
)
Cro
pC
ode3
In t
he h
arve
st …
how
muc
h w
as t
he c
ost
of …
oth
er c
osts
how
man
y he
ctar
es
did
you
harv
est?
wha
t was
the
cost
of
har
vest
per
he
ctar
e?
rent
of i
nfra
stru
ctur
e an
d/or
faci
litie
s?
depr
ecia
tion
of
infr
astr
uctu
re a
nd/o
r fa
cilit
ies?
8
how
muc
h di
d yo
u pa
y in
tota
l for
shi
ppin
g?
how
muc
h di
d yo
u pa
y fo
r ex
pens
es o
ther
than
thos
e m
entio
ned?
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
1/ s
tate
the
cost
s in
loca
l cur
renc
y.2
/ if t
he in
terv
iew
ee g
row
s cr
ops
in c
ompa
nion
pla
ntin
g, r
ecor
d th
e co
mm
on c
osts
onl
y on
the
line
corr
espo
ndin
g to
the
mai
n cr
op; a
nd in
the
case
of d
iffer
entia
ted
cost
s (s
uch
as s
eed,
pes
t and
/or
dise
ase
cont
rol,
harv
est o
r ot
hers
) th
ese
mus
t be
reco
rded
in th
e co
rres
pond
ing
crop
.3
/ see
cro
ps t
able
.4
/ ref
ers
to p
lant
mat
eria
l use
d to
initi
ate
a cr
op.
5/ r
ecor
d th
e co
de a
ccor
ding
to th
e un
its o
f mea
sure
men
t tab
le.
6/ i
nclu
des,
if a
pplic
able
, the
cos
t of r
owin
g an
d pa
ddin
g.7/
ref
ers
to h
oldi
ng a
wat
er c
once
ssio
n rig
ht is
sued
by
the
gove
rnm
ent.
8/ t
he d
epre
ciat
ion
valu
e w
ill b
e ob
tain
ed fr
om th
e da
ta th
at is
rec
orde
d in
que
stio
n 77
.
2.2.
2 P
eren
nial
cro
ps
7. I
n th
e 20
10 a
gric
ultu
ral y
ear,
in y
our
prod
uctio
n un
it di
d yo
u ha
ve p
astu
res,
pla
ntat
ions
, fr
uit
tree
s or
oth
er t
ypes
of
crop
s w
ith a
cyc
le
grea
ter
than
one
yea
r?
yes:
(1)
no:
(0)
if n
o, s
kip
to q
uest
ion
11.
61Program and Project design
8. I
n th
e 20
10 a
gric
ultu
ral y
ear,
in y
our
agric
ultu
ral a
ctiv
ity…
wha
t ty
pe o
f fr
uit
tree
s,
past
ure
and/
or p
lant
atio
ns
do y
ou h
ave,
st
arti
ng w
ith
the
mai
n on
e?1
Cod
e2
how
muc
h la
nd a
rea
do
you
have
pla
nted
?
how
muc
h do
you
es
tim
ate
is
the
valu
e of
you
r pl
anta
tion
s (e
xclu
ding
th
e la
nd)?
(loca
l cu
rren
cy)
how
muc
h la
nd
area
do
you
have
in
prod
ucti
on?
how
muc
h la
nd a
rea
is
mec
hani
zed?
how
muc
h di
d yo
u ha
rves
t in
the
201
0
agri
cult
ural
yea
r?
wha
t qu
anti
ty d
id
you
sell
in t
he
201
0 a
gric
ultu
ral
year
4 …
wha
t qu
anti
ty d
id
you
use
for
self-
cons
umpt
ion4
at w
hat
pric
e di
d yo
u se
ll in
the
201
0 a
gric
ultu
ral
year
…(lo
cal c
urre
ncy/
unit
of
mea
sure
men
t)
am
ount
Uni
t of
mea
sure
men
t3a
mou
ntU
nit o
f m
easu
rem
ent3
am
ount
Uni
t of
mea
sure
men
t3a
mou
ntU
nit o
f m
easu
rem
ent3
in th
e co
untr
y?ab
road
?fo
r th
e fa
mily
(f
ood)
?5
for
prod
uctio
n (in
puts
)?
in th
e co
untr
y?ab
road
?
1. 2. 3.
1/ t
he m
ain
crop
ref
ers
to th
e on
e th
at g
ener
ates
the
grea
test
inco
me
in h
is/h
er u
nit o
f pro
duct
ion.
2/ s
ee c
rops
tab
le.
3/ r
ecor
d th
e co
de a
ccor
ding
to th
e un
its o
f mea
sure
men
t tab
le.
4/ i
n th
ese
colu
mns
the
info
rmat
ion
shou
ld b
e re
cord
ed u
sing
the
sam
e un
it of
mea
sure
men
t tha
t was
us
ed to
rec
ord
the
volu
me
harv
este
d; if
app
licab
le, t
he c
orre
spon
ding
con
vers
ion
shou
ld b
e m
ade.
5/ i
f he/
she
did
not s
ell h
is/h
er p
rodu
ctio
n an
d it
was
use
d fo
r fa
mily
con
sum
ptio
n as
k th
e pr
ice
in th
e lo
calit
y or
reg
ion
of th
e pr
oduc
t, pl
acin
g it
in th
e sp
ace
corr
espo
ndin
g to
pric
e in
the
coun
try.
9. I
n th
e 20
10 a
gric
ultu
ral y
ear,
or in
prio
r ye
ars,
wha
t w
ere
the
cost
s of
est
ablis
hing
or
buyi
ng y
our
plan
tatio
ns?
(Int
ervi
ewer
: K
eep
the
sam
e cr
op o
rder
as
in q
uest
ion
8)1
9.1
If
any
pla
ntat
ion
was
est
ablis
hed…
Cro
pC
ode2
how
m
uch
land
are
a di
d yo
u pl
ant?
uni
t of
m
easu
rem
ent3
in
wha
t ye
ar
did
you
plan
t it
?
In t
he p
repa
rati
on o
f th
e la
nd,
how
man
y he
ctar
es …
for
plan
ting
…
oth
er c
osts
as
soci
ated
w
ith
the
esta
blis
hmen
t of
the
pl
anta
tion
did
you
clea
n or
de
fore
st?
how
m
uch
did
it co
st p
er
hect
are?
wer
e lig
ht
plow
ed?
how
m
uch
did
it co
st p
er
hect
are?
wer
e pl
owed
?
how
m
uch
did
it co
st p
er
hect
are?
wha
t qu
antit
y of
see
ds
did
you
use
per
hect
are?
Uni
t of
mea
sure
men
t3
wha
t w
as
the
pric
e of
the
seed
?
how
man
y pl
ants
di
d yo
u pl
ant p
er
hect
are?
wha
t w
as
the
pric
e pe
r pl
ant?
how
muc
h di
d it
cost
to p
lant
pe
r he
ctar
e (e
xclu
ding
the
seed
or
plan
ts)?
(inst
alla
tion
of
win
dbre
aker
ba
rrie
rs,
prot
ectio
n fe
nces
, am
ong
othe
rs).
1. 2. 3.
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
62
9.2
If
you
bou
ght
a pl
anta
tion…
Cro
pC
ode2
in w
hat
year
di
d yo
u bu
y it
?
how
muc
h la
nd
area
did
you
buy
?u
nit
of
mea
sure
men
t3
how
old
was
the
pl
anta
tion
?(y
ears
)
how
muc
h di
d it
co
st?
1. 2. 3.
1/ s
tate
the
cost
s in
loca
l cur
renc
y.
2/ s
ee c
rops
tab
le.
3/ r
ecor
d th
e co
de a
ccor
ding
to th
e un
its o
f mea
sure
men
t tab
le.
10.
In t
he 2
010
agr
icul
tura
l yea
r, w
hat
wer
e th
e pr
oduc
tion
cost
s of
you
r cr
ops?
(Int
ervi
ewer
: K
eep
the
sam
e or
der
of c
rops
as
in q
uest
ion
8)1
Cro
p C
ode2
If y
ou a
pplie
d fe
rtili
zers
…P
runi
ng
on h
ow m
any
hect
ares
wer
e th
ey a
pplie
d?
wha
t qua
ntity
of
fert
ilize
r di
d yo
u us
e pe
r he
ctar
e?
Uni
t of
mea
sure
men
t3
how
muc
h di
d th
e fe
rtili
zer
cost
per
uni
t of
mea
sure
men
t?
how
muc
h di
d it
cost
to a
pply
th
e fe
rtili
zers
per
he
ctar
e?
on
how
man
y he
ctar
es
was
it d
one?
how
man
y pr
unin
gs
wer
e do
ne?
how
muc
h di
d ea
ch
prun
ing
done
cos
t?4
1. 2. 3.
63Program and Project design
Que
stio
n 10
con
tinue
d…
(Int
ervi
ewer
: K
eep
the
sam
e or
der
of c
rops
)
Cro
p C
ode2
If w
eed
cont
rol w
as d
one
…If
pes
t an
d/or
dis
ease
con
trol
was
don
e …
che
mic
al c
ontr
ol:
man
ual c
ontr
ol:
on h
ow
man
y he
ctar
es
wer
e pe
stic
ides
an
d/or
fu
ngic
ides
ap
plie
d?
wha
t am
ount
of
pes
ticid
es
and/
or
fung
icid
es
was
use
d pe
r he
ctar
e?
Uni
t of
mea
sure
men
t3
how
muc
h di
d th
e pr
oduc
t cos
t pe
r un
it of
m
easu
rem
ent?
how
muc
h di
d th
e ap
plic
atio
n of
the
prod
ucts
co
st p
er
hect
are?
on h
ow m
any
hect
ares
wer
e he
rbic
ides
ap
plie
d?
how
muc
h he
rbic
ide
was
us
ed p
er
hect
are?
Uni
t of
mea
sure
men
t3
how
muc
h di
d th
e he
rbic
ide
cost
pe
r un
it of
m
easu
rem
ent?
how
muc
h di
d th
e ap
plic
atio
n of
the
herb
icid
e co
st
per
hect
are?
on h
ow m
any
hect
ares
was
th
e co
ntro
l ca
rrie
d ou
t?
how
muc
h di
d it
cost
per
he
ctar
e?
1. 2. 3. Que
stio
n 10
con
tinue
d…
(Int
ervi
ewer
: K
eep
the
sam
e or
der
of c
rops
)
Cro
pC
ode2
If ir
riga
tion
was
app
lied
…
how
muc
h la
nd w
as
irrig
ated
?
if ho
lder
5 of
the
wat
er u
se r
ight
s …
if no
t hol
der
of th
e w
ater
use
rig
hts,
how
m
uch
did
it co
st to
irr
igat
e?
on
how
man
y he
ctar
es w
ere
any
of th
e fo
llow
ing
type
s of
irrig
atio
n ap
plie
d?
how
muc
h w
as
paid
for
the
use
of e
lect
ricity
for
irrig
atio
n?
how
muc
h di
d it
cost
to ir
rigat
e (u
se
right
s, la
bor
or
othe
r co
sts)
?
ear
then
ca
nals
Line
d ca
nals
can
nons
sprin
kler
sy
stem
mic
ro-s
prin
kler
sy
stem
drip
sy
stem
oth
er
1. 2. 3.
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
64
Que
stio
n 10
con
clud
ed…
(Int
ervi
ewer
: K
eep
the
sam
e or
der
of c
rops
)
cro
pc
ode2
in th
e ha
rves
t…h
ow m
uch
was
the
cost
for
the
conc
ept o
f…o
ther
cos
ts
how
man
y he
ctar
es d
id
you
harv
est?
wha
t was
the
cost
of h
arve
st
per
hect
are?
rent
of i
nfra
stru
ctur
e an
d/or
faci
litie
s?
depr
ecia
tion
of
infr
astr
uctu
re a
nd/o
r fa
cilit
ies?
6
how
muc
h di
d yo
u pa
y in
tota
l fo
r sh
ippi
ng?
how
muc
h di
d yo
u pa
y fo
r ex
pens
es o
ther
than
th
ose
men
tione
d?
1. 2. 3.
1/ e
xpre
ss th
e co
sts
in lo
cal c
urre
ncy.
2/ s
ee c
rops
tab
le.
3/ r
ecor
d th
e co
de a
ccor
ding
to th
e un
its o
f mea
sure
men
t tab
le.
4/ i
ndic
ate
the
cost
of t
he p
runi
ng fo
r th
e w
hole
land
are
a on
whi
ch it
was
don
e.5
/ ref
ers
to h
oldi
ng a
con
cess
ion
title
for
wat
er is
sued
by
the
gove
rnm
ent.
6/ t
he d
epre
ciat
ion
valu
e w
ill b
e ob
tain
ed fr
om th
e da
ta th
at is
rec
orde
d in
que
stio
n 77
.
2.2.
3 c
rops
gro
wn
in g
reen
hous
es1
1/
incl
ude
unde
r th
is c
ateg
ory
gree
nhou
ses,
nur
serie
s, s
hade
cov
er (
shad
ing
latt
ice)
, mac
ro-t
unne
ls a
nd o
ther
agr
icul
ture
sys
tem
s un
der
wea
ther
con
trol
.
11.
from
Apr
il 20
10 t
o M
arch
201
1, in
you
r un
it of
pro
duct
ion
did
you
plan
t cr
ops
in a
gre
enho
use?
yes:
(1)
no:
(0)
if
no,
go
to q
uest
ion
14.
65Program and Project design
12.
from
Apr
il 20
10 t
o M
arch
201
1, in
you
r ag
ricul
tura
l act
ivity…
wha
t cr
ops
did
you
grow
in a
gr
eenh
ouse
?1C
ode2
how
muc
h la
nd a
rea
did
you
plan
t?
wha
t w
as t
he t
otal
pr
oduc
tion
for
the
indi
cate
d pe
riod
?
of
the
prod
ucti
on o
btai
ned,
how
muc
h di
d yo
u se
ll in
the
indi
cate
d pe
riod
…at
wha
t av
erag
e pr
ice
did
you
sell
it …
(loca
l cur
renc
y/un
it of
mea
sure
men
t)
am
ount
Uni
t of
mea
sure
men
t3a
mou
ntU
nit o
f m
easu
rem
ent3
in th
e co
untr
y?ab
road
?in
the
coun
try?
abro
ad?
1. 2. 3.
1/ i
f in
the
perio
d in
dica
ted
the
sam
e cr
op w
as p
lant
ed m
ore
than
onc
e, th
e in
form
atio
n on
ea
ch c
rop
shou
ld b
e re
gist
ered
on
diff
eren
t lin
es fo
r ea
ch o
ne p
lant
ed.
2/ s
ee c
rops
tab
le.
3/ r
ecor
d th
e co
de a
ccor
ding
to th
e un
its o
f mea
sure
men
t tab
le.
13.
from
Apr
il 20
10 t
o M
arch
201
1, w
hat
wer
e th
e co
sts
of p
rodu
ctio
n of
the
cro
ps g
row
n in
gre
enho
uses
?
(Int
ervi
ewer
: K
eep
the
sam
e or
der
of c
rops
as
ques
tion
12)1
Cro
pC
ode2
how
muc
h di
d yo
u pa
y fo
r th
e pr
epar
atio
n of
th
e la
nd o
r su
bstr
atum
in
the
indi
cate
d pe
riod
?3
for
plan
ting
…o
ther
cos
ts a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith
plan
ting
wha
t was
the
amou
nt o
f se
eds
used
?4
Uni
t of
mea
sure
men
t5w
hat w
as th
e pr
ice
of s
eed?
how
man
y se
edlin
gs w
ere
plan
ted?
4
wha
t was
th
e pr
ice
per
seed
ling?
wha
t was
the
tota
l cos
t of
plan
ting
(exc
ludi
ng s
eed
or
seed
ling)
?
(roo
ting
and
othe
r in
puts
or
mat
eria
ls)
1. 2. 3.
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
66
Que
stio
n 13
con
tinue
d…
(Int
ervi
ewer
: K
eep
the
sam
e or
der
of c
rops
)
Cro
p C
ode2
In t
he a
pplic
atio
n of
fer
tiliz
ers
…
In c
rop
prac
tice
s (p
runi
ng,
plan
t su
ppor
ting
, cl
earing
, lig
ht p
runi
ng,
clea
ning
or
othe
rs)
…
If p
est
and/
or d
isea
se c
ontr
ol w
as d
one
…
how
muc
h fe
rtili
zer
did
you
use?
Uni
t of
mea
sure
men
t5
how
muc
h di
d th
e fe
rtili
zer
cost
per
uni
t of
mea
sure
men
t?
how
muc
h di
d it
cost
to
app
ly th
e fe
rtili
zers
?
how
muc
h di
d it
cost
?
how
man
y cr
op
prac
tices
wer
e do
ne?
how
man
y ap
plic
atio
ns
wer
e do
ne?
how
muc
h pe
stic
ide
and/
or fu
ngic
ide
was
use
d pe
r ap
plic
atio
n?
Uni
t of
mea
sure
men
t5
how
muc
h di
d th
e pr
oduc
t us
ed c
ost
per
unit
of
mea
sure
men
t?
how
muc
h di
d ea
ch
appl
icat
ion
cost
?
1. 2. 3. Que
stio
n 13
con
clud
ed…
(Int
ervi
ewer
: K
eep
the
sam
e or
der
of c
rops
)
Cro
pC
ode2
In ir
riga
tion
…In
har
vest
…h
ow m
uch
did
it c
ost
for
…o
ther
cos
ts …
how
muc
h di
d yo
u pa
y fo
r th
e co
nsum
ptio
n of
ele
ctric
ity
for
irrig
atio
n?
how
muc
h di
d yo
u sp
end
on
mat
eria
ls
used
for
irrig
atio
n?
how
muc
h di
d yo
u sp
end
on
wat
er?
the
irrig
atio
n sy
stem
ut
ilize
d w
as…
6ho
w m
uch
land
are
a di
d yo
u ha
rves
t?
Uni
t of
mea
sure
men
t5
wha
t was
the
tota
l cos
t of
harv
estin
g?7
rent
of
infr
astr
uctu
re
and/
or
faci
litie
s?
depr
ecia
tion
of
infr
astr
uctu
re
and/
or
faci
litie
s?8
how
m
uch
did
you
pay
in to
tal f
or
ship
ping
?
how
muc
h di
d yo
u pa
y fo
r ex
pens
es
othe
r th
an
thos
e m
entio
ned?
man
ual?
tech
nifie
d?
1. 2. 3.
1/ s
tate
the
cost
s in
loca
l cur
renc
y.2
/ see
cro
ps t
able
.3
/ all
inpu
ts a
nd a
ctiv
ities
nec
essa
ry to
hav
e th
e la
nd in
ade
quat
e co
nditi
on fo
r pl
antin
g sh
ould
be
incl
uded
.4
/ rec
ord
the
tota
l am
ount
use
d in
gre
enho
uses
.5
/ rec
ord
the
code
acc
ordi
ng to
the
units
of m
easu
rem
ent t
able
.6
/ mar
k w
ith a
n x
. in
case
bot
h sy
stem
s ar
e us
ed in
dica
te o
nly
the
one
with
whi
ch th
e gr
eate
st la
nd a
rea
is ir
rigat
ed.
7/ in
clud
es m
ater
ials
, equ
ipm
ent,
labo
r or
oth
ers.
8/ t
he d
epre
ciat
ion
valu
e w
ill b
e ob
tain
ed fr
om th
e da
ta th
at a
re r
ecor
ded
in q
uest
ion
77.
67Program and Project design
2.2.
4 c
ompl
emen
tary
que
stio
ns o
n ag
ricul
tura
l act
iviti
es
14.
In
the
2010
agr
icul
tura
l yea
r, di
d yo
ur p
rodu
ctio
n ha
ve a
ny c
ertif
icat
ion1 …
1. fo
r or
gani
c cr
ops?
2. fo
r he
alth
?
3. fo
r sa
fety
?
4. fo
r en
viro
nmen
tal s
ervi
ces?
5. fo
r so
me
othe
r ty
pe?
1/ m
ark
with
an
x th
e ty
pe o
f cer
tific
atio
n it
had,
if a
pplic
able
.
15.
In t
he 2
010
agr
icul
tura
l yea
r, w
hat
perc
enta
ge o
f yo
ur p
rodu
ctio
n w
as c
ertif
ied?
Cro
pC
ode1
Per
cent
age
of p
rodu
ct c
erti
fied
1. 2. 3.
1/ s
ee c
rops
tab
le.
16.
In t
he 2
010
agr
icul
tura
l yea
r, in
you
r ag
ricul
tura
l act
ivity…
how
man
y fa
mily
mem
bers
he
lped
you
?1ho
w m
any
hour
s pe
r da
y on
ave
rage
did
th
ey h
elp
you?
during
how
man
y da
ys
on a
vera
ge d
id t
hey
help
yo
u?
num
ber
of f
amily
day
's
wor
k us
ed2
how
muc
h do
es a
day
’s w
ork
cost
in t
he
loca
lity
or r
egio
n?
1/ i
nclu
des
the
prod
ucer
, if a
pplic
able
.2
/ Int
ervi
ewer
: in
this
col
umn
the
resu
lt of
mul
tiply
ing
the
thre
e pr
evio
us c
olum
ns a
nd d
ivid
ing
by 8
sho
uld
be r
ecor
ded.
a d
ay’s
wor
k is
equ
ival
ent t
o a
wor
king
day
whi
ch n
orm
ally
is 8
hou
rs.
Fam
ily d
ay’s
wor
k re
fers
to la
bor
prov
ided
by
fam
ily m
embe
rs th
at h
elpe
d on
the
farm
with
out r
ecei
ving
com
pens
atio
n.
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
68
17.
In t
he 2
010
agr
icul
tura
l yea
r…
did
you
rece
ive
a su
bsid
y fo
r di
esel
?1fo
r ho
w m
any
liter
s di
d yo
u re
ceiv
e th
e su
bsid
y?w
hat
was
the
tot
al a
mou
nt o
f lit
ers
used
for
you
r ag
ricu
ltur
al a
ctiv
itie
s?
1
/ mar
k w
ith a
n x
if af
firm
ativ
e.
Inte
rvie
wer
: R
ecor
d th
e pr
ice
per
liter
of
dies
el o
n th
e da
te o
f fil
ling
out
the
ques
tionn
aire
:___
____
___
loca
l cur
renc
y.
2.3
Live
stoc
k ac
tiviti
es
18.
from
Apr
il 20
10 t
o M
arch
201
1, a
s a
resu
lt of
you
r liv
esto
ck a
ctiv
ity,
you
pro
duce
d…
only
prim
ary
prod
ucts
(with
out t
rans
form
atio
n or
pro
cess
ing)
?pr
imar
y pr
oduc
ts a
nd p
rodu
cts
tran
sfor
med
or
proc
esse
d?1
1
/ app
ly th
e qu
estio
ns o
f thi
s se
ctio
n (2
.3)
and
sect
ion
2.6
Pro
duct
s tr
ansf
orm
ed o
r pr
oces
sed.
19.
In y
our
unit
of p
rodu
ctio
n, d
o yo
u ha
ve1 …
1.ca
ttle
?2
2.pi
gs?3
3.he
ns a
nd c
hick
ens?
4
4.sh
eep?
5
5.go
ats?
6
6.be
es?7
7.ot
her
anim
al s
peci
es?8
1/ m
ark
with
an
x on
ly th
e th
ree
spec
ies
that
gen
erat
e m
ost o
f the
inco
me
for
the
inte
rvie
wee
and
app
ly th
e qu
estio
nnai
re o
nly
for
thos
e sp
ecie
s.2
/ ski
p to
que
stio
n 20
.3
/ ski
p to
que
stio
n 23
.4
/ ski
p to
que
stio
n 26
.5
/ ski
p to
que
stio
n 2
9.6
/ ski
p to
que
stio
n 32
.7/
ski
p to
que
stio
n 35
.8
/ ski
p to
que
stio
n 3
8.
69Program and Project design
2.3.
1 c
attle
20.
of
the
catt
le y
ou h
ave…
how
man
y ar
e …
1w
hat
is t
he e
stim
ated
tot
al v
alue
?2
1.fo
r be
ef p
rodu
ctio
n?
2.co
ws
for
milk
pro
duct
ion?
3.do
uble
pur
pose
cow
s?
4.co
ws
for
seed
sto
ck?
5.ca
lves
?
6.br
eedi
ng m
ales
?
1/ i
ndic
ate
the
num
ber
of a
nim
als.
2/ s
tate
the
valu
e in
loca
l cur
renc
y.
21.
from
Apr
il 20
10 t
o M
arch
201
1, o
f yo
ur p
rodu
ctio
n…
how
muc
h w
as s
old
in t
he
coun
try?
uni
t of
m
easu
rem
ent1
how
muc
h w
as s
old
abro
ad?
uni
t of
m
easu
rem
ent1
how
muc
h w
as u
sed
for
self-
cons
umpt
ion
uni
t of
m
easu
rem
ent1
at w
hat
pric
e di
d yo
u se
ll…(lo
cal c
urre
ncy/
unit
of m
easu
rem
ent)
for
the
fam
ily (
food
)?2
for
prod
uctio
n (in
puts
)?in
the
coun
try?
abro
ad?
1.of
ani
mal
s fo
r m
eat?
2.of
cal
ves?
3.of
fina
lized
ani
mal
s?
4.of
cul
led
anim
als?
5.of
milk
?
6.of
bre
edin
g st
ock
anim
als?
1/ r
ecor
d th
e co
de a
ccor
ding
to th
e un
its o
f mea
sure
men
t tab
le.
2/ i
f the
pro
duct
ion
was
not
sol
d an
d w
as u
sed
for
fam
ily c
onsu
mpt
ion,
ask
the
pric
e in
the
loca
lity
or r
egio
n of
the
prod
uct
and
plac
e it
in th
e sp
ace
corr
espo
ndin
g to
pric
e in
the
coun
try.
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
70
22.
from
Apr
il 20
10 t
o M
arch
201
1, w
hat
wer
e th
e co
sts
in t
he p
rodu
ctio
n of
cat
tle f
or1 …
feed
?2he
alth
?3ar
tifi
cial
inse
min
atio
n an
d/or
mat
ing?
cons
umpt
ion
of
elec
tric
ity?
othe
r in
puts
?la
bor?
rent
of
equi
pmen
t an
d fa
cilit
ies?
depr
ecia
tion
of
equi
pmen
t an
d fa
cilit
ies?
4 o
ther
con
cept
s?5
1/ s
tate
the
cost
s in
loca
l cur
renc
y.2
/ inc
lude
s gr
azin
g, c
ut fo
dder
, bal
ance
d fe
ed, a
nd fe
ed s
uppl
emen
ts, a
mon
g ot
hers
, tha
t hav
e be
en p
urch
ased
. su
bseq
uent
ly, i
f app
licab
le, t
he in
terv
iew
er s
houl
d ad
d to
this
item
the
cost
of p
rodu
ctio
n of
the
feed
pro
duce
d by
the
prod
ucer
him
/her
self
(pro
duct
ion
self-
cons
umpt
ion)
. 3
/ inc
lude
s th
e co
st o
f med
icin
es, v
acci
nes
and
paym
ent o
f vet
erin
ary
serv
ices
, am
ong
othe
rs.
4/ t
he d
epre
ciat
ion
valu
e w
ill b
e ob
tain
ed fr
om th
e da
ta th
at a
re r
ecor
ded
in q
uest
ion
77.
5/ o
ther
exp
ense
s su
ch a
s sh
ippi
ng, p
arts
, etc
.
2.3.
2 P
igs
23.
of
the
pigs
you
hav
e…
how
man
y ar
e …
1w
hat d
o yo
u es
timat
e is
thei
r to
tal v
alue
?2
1.fe
mal
e re
prod
ucer
s?
2.fa
tten
ing
pigs
?
3.br
eedi
ng s
tock
?
4.ho
gs?
1/ i
ndic
ate
the
num
ber
of a
nim
als.
2/ s
tate
the
valu
e in
loca
l cur
renc
y.
71Program and Project design
24.
from
Apr
il 20
10 t
o M
arch
201
1, o
f yo
ur p
rodu
ctio
n…
how
muc
h w
as
sold
in t
he
coun
try
uni
t of
m
easu
rem
ent1
how
muc
h w
as
sold
abr
oad
uni
t of
m
easu
rem
ent1
wha
t am
ount
was
use
d fo
r se
lf-co
nsum
ptio
nu
nit
of
mea
sure
men
t1
at w
as p
rice
did
you
sel
l…(lo
cal c
urre
ncy/
unit
of m
easu
rem
ent)
for
the
fam
ily
(foo
d)?2
for
prod
uctio
n (in
puts
)?in
the
coun
try?
abro
ad?
1.of
mea
t ani
mal
s?
2.of
fina
lized
pig
s?
3.of
cul
led
anim
als?
4.of
wea
ning
pig
s?
5.of
bre
edin
g st
ock?
1/ r
ecor
d th
e co
de a
ccor
ding
to th
e un
its o
f mea
sure
men
t tab
le.
2/ i
f the
pro
duct
ion
was
not
sol
d an
d it
was
use
d fo
r fa
mily
sel
f-co
nsum
ptio
n, a
sk th
e pr
ice
in th
e lo
calit
y or
reg
ion
of th
e pr
oduc
t and
pla
ce it
in th
e sp
ace
corr
espo
ndin
g to
pric
e in
the
coun
try.
25.
from
Apr
il 20
10 t
o M
arch
201
1, w
hat
wer
e th
e co
sts
in t
he p
rodu
ctio
n of
pig
s fo
r1 …
feed
?2he
alth
3ar
tifi
cial
in
sem
inat
ion
or
coup
ling?
cons
umpt
ion
of
wat
er?
cons
umpt
ion
of
elec
tric
ity?
othe
r in
puts
?la
bor?
rent
of
equi
pmen
t an
d fa
cilit
ies?
depr
ecia
tion
of
equi
pmen
t an
d fa
cilit
ies?
4ot
her
conc
epts
?5
1/ s
tate
the
cost
s in
loca
l cur
renc
y.2
/ inc
lude
s ba
lanc
ed fe
ed, f
eed
supp
lem
ents
, am
ong
othe
rs, t
hat h
ad b
een
boug
ht. s
ubse
quen
tly,
if ap
plic
able
, the
inte
rvie
wer
sho
uld
add
to th
is it
em th
e co
st o
f pro
duct
ion
of th
e fe
ed p
rodu
ced
by
the
prod
ucer
him
/her
self
(pro
duct
ion
self-
cons
umpt
ion)
. 3
/ inc
lude
s th
e co
st o
f med
icin
es, v
acci
nes,
and
pay
men
t of v
eter
inar
ian
serv
ices
, am
ong
othe
rs.
4/ t
he d
epre
ciat
ion
valu
e w
ill b
e ob
tain
ed fr
om th
e da
ta th
at is
rec
orde
d in
que
stio
n 77
.5
/ exp
ense
s su
ch a
s sh
ippi
ng, p
arts
, etc
.
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
72
2.3.
3 h
ens
and
chic
kens
26.
of
the
hens
and
chi
cken
s yo
u ha
ve…
how
man
y ar
e …
1w
hat
is t
he e
stim
ated
tot
al v
alue
?2
1.la
ying
hen
s?
2.br
eedi
ng h
ens?
3.m
eat c
hick
ens?
4.ch
icks
?
1/ i
ndic
ate
the
num
ber
of a
nim
als.
2/ s
tate
the
valu
e in
loca
l cur
renc
y.
27.
from
Apr
il 20
10 t
o M
arch
201
1, f
rom
you
r pr
oduc
tion…
how
muc
h di
d yo
u se
ll on
ave
rage
m
onth
ly in
the
co
untr
y
uni
t of
m
easu
rem
ent1
how
muc
h di
d yo
u se
ll on
ave
rage
m
onth
ly a
broa
d
uni
t of
m
easu
rem
ent1
how
muc
h w
as u
sed
during
the
ye
ar f
or s
elf-
cons
umpt
ion
uni
t of
m
easu
rem
ent1
at w
hat
pric
e di
d yo
u se
ll…(lo
cal c
urre
ncy/
unit
of m
easu
rem
ent)
for
the
fam
ily
(foo
d)?2
for
prod
uctio
n (in
puts
)?in
the
coun
try?
abro
ad?
1.of
mea
t chi
cken
s?
2.of
egg
s?
3.of
oth
er p
rodu
cts?
1/ r
ecor
d th
e co
de a
ccor
ding
to th
e un
its o
f mea
sure
men
t tab
le.
2/ i
f the
pro
duct
ion
was
not
sol
d an
d it
was
use
d fo
r fa
mily
con
sum
ptio
n, a
sk th
e pr
ice
in th
e lo
calit
y or
reg
ion
of th
e pr
oduc
t and
pla
ce it
in th
e sp
ace
for
pric
e in
the
coun
try.
73Program and Project design
28.
from
Apr
il 20
10 t
o M
arch
201
1, w
hat
wer
e th
e co
sts
in t
he p
rodu
ctio
n of
hen
s an
d ch
icke
ns f
or1 …
feed
?2he
alth
?3re
prod
ucti
on?
wat
er
cons
umpt
ion?
elec
tric
ity
cons
umpt
ion?
othe
r in
puts
?la
bor?
rent
of
equi
pmen
t an
d fa
cilit
ies?
depr
ecia
tion
of
equi
pmen
t an
d fa
cilit
ies?
4ot
her
conc
epts
?5
1/ s
tate
the
cost
s in
loca
l cur
renc
y.2
/ inc
lude
s ba
lanc
ed fe
ed, f
eed
supp
lem
ents
, am
ong
othe
rs, t
hat h
ave
been
bou
ght.
subs
eque
ntly
, if
appl
icab
le, t
he in
terv
iew
er s
houl
d ad
d to
this
item
the
cost
of p
rodu
ctio
n of
the
feed
pro
duce
d by
the
prod
ucer
him
/her
self
(pro
duct
ion
self-
cons
umpt
ion)
. 3
/ inc
lude
s th
e co
st o
f med
icin
es, v
acci
nes,
and
pay
men
t of v
eter
inar
y se
rvic
es, a
mon
g ot
hers
.4
/ the
dep
reci
atio
n va
lue
will
be
obta
ined
from
the
data
that
is r
ecor
ded
in q
uest
ion
77.
5/ e
xpen
ses
such
as
ship
ping
, par
ts, e
tc.
2.3.
4 sh
eep
29.
of
the
shee
p yo
u ha
ve…
how
man
y ar
e1w
hat
is t
he e
stim
ated
tot
al v
alue
?2
1.fe
mal
e re
prod
ucer
s?
2.fa
tten
ing
shee
p?
3.br
eedi
ng s
tock
?
1/ i
ndic
ate
the
num
ber
of a
nim
als.
2/ s
tate
the
valu
e in
loca
l cur
renc
y.
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
74
30.
from
Apr
il 20
10 t
o M
arch
201
1, o
f yo
ur p
rodu
ctio
n…
how
muc
h di
d yo
u se
ll in
the
co
untr
y
uni
t of
m
easu
rem
ent1
how
muc
h di
d yo
u se
ll ab
road
uni
t of
m
easu
rem
ent1
how
muc
h w
as u
sed
for
self-
cons
umpt
ion
uni
t of
m
easu
rem
ent1
at w
hat
pric
e di
d yo
u se
ll…(lo
cal c
urre
ncy/
unit
of m
easu
rem
ent)
for
the
fam
ily
(foo
d)?2
for
prod
uctio
n (in
puts
)?in
the
coun
try?
abro
ad?
1.of
ani
mal
s fo
r m
eat?
2.of
fina
lized
ani
mal
s?
3.of
cul
led
anim
als?
4.of
woo
l?
5.of
bre
edin
g st
ock?
1/ r
ecor
d th
e co
de a
ccor
ding
to th
e un
its o
f mea
sure
men
t tab
le.
2/ i
f the
pro
duct
ion
was
not
sol
d an
d it
was
use
d fo
r fa
mily
con
sum
ptio
n, a
sk th
e pr
ice
in th
e lo
calit
y or
reg
ion
of th
e pr
oduc
t and
pla
ce it
in th
e sp
ace
for
pric
e in
the
coun
try.
31.
from
Apr
il 20
10 t
o M
arch
201
1, w
hat
wer
e th
e co
sts
in t
he p
rodu
ctio
n of
she
ep f
or1 …
feed
?2he
alth
?3ar
tifi
cial
inse
min
atio
n or
mat
ing?
othe
r in
puts
?la
bor?
rent
of
equi
pmen
t an
d fa
cilit
ies?
depr
ecia
tion
of
equi
pmen
t an
d fa
cilit
ies?
4ot
her
conc
epts
?5 1/ s
tate
the
cost
s in
loca
l cur
renc
y.2
/ inc
lude
s gr
azin
g, c
ut fo
dder
, bal
ance
d fe
ed, a
nd fe
ed s
uppl
emen
ts, a
mon
g ot
hers
, tha
t hav
e be
en p
urch
ased
. sub
sequ
ently
, if a
pplic
able
, the
inte
rvie
wer
sho
uld
add
to th
is it
em th
e co
st o
f pr
oduc
tion
of fe
ed p
rodu
ced
by th
e pr
oduc
er h
im/h
erse
lf (p
rodu
ctio
n se
lf-co
nsum
ptio
n).
3/ i
nclu
des
the
cost
of m
edic
ines
, vac
cine
s, a
nd p
aym
ent o
f vet
erin
ary
serv
ices
, am
ong
othe
rs.
4/ t
he d
epre
ciat
ion
valu
e w
ill b
e ob
tain
ed fr
om th
e da
ta th
at a
re r
ecor
ded
in q
uest
ion
77.
5/ e
.g.:
exp
ense
s fo
r sh
ippi
ng, p
arts
, etc
.
75Program and Project design
2.3.
5 g
oats
32.
of
the
goat
s yo
u ha
ve…
how
man
y ar
e …
1w
hat
do y
ou e
stim
ate
is t
heir
tot
al v
alue
?2
1.fo
r m
eat p
rodu
ctio
n?
2.m
ilk g
oats
?
3.do
uble
pur
pose
goa
ts?
4.ki
ds?
5.br
eedi
ng m
ales
?
1/ i
ndic
ate
the
num
ber
of a
nim
als.
2/ s
tate
the
valu
e in
loca
l cur
renc
y.
33.
from
Apr
il 20
10 t
o M
arch
201
1, o
f yo
ur p
rodu
ctio
n…
how
muc
h di
d yo
u se
ll in
the
co
untr
y
uni
t of
m
easu
rem
ent1
how
muc
h di
d yo
u se
ll ab
road
uni
t of
m
easu
rem
ent1
how
muc
h di
d yo
u us
e fo
r se
lf-co
nsum
ptio
nu
nit
of
mea
sure
men
t1
at w
hat
pric
e di
d yo
u se
ll…(lo
cal c
urre
ncy/
unit
of m
easu
rem
ent)
for
the
fam
ily
(foo
d)?2
for
prod
uctio
n (in
puts
)?in
the
coun
try?
abro
ad?
1.of
mea
t ani
mal
s?
2.of
fina
lized
goa
ts?
3.of
kid
s?
4.of
cul
led
anim
als?
5.of
milk
?
6.of
bre
edin
g st
ock?
1/ r
ecor
d th
e co
de a
ccor
ding
to th
e un
its o
f mea
sure
men
t tab
le.
2/ i
f the
pro
duct
ion
was
not
sol
d an
d it
was
use
d fo
r fa
mily
con
sum
ptio
n, a
sk th
e pr
ice
in th
e lo
calit
y or
reg
ion
of th
e pr
oduc
t an
d pl
ace
it in
the
spac
e fo
r pr
ice
in th
e co
untr
y.
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
76
34.
from
Apr
il 20
10 t
o M
arch
201
1, w
hat
wer
e th
e co
sts
in t
he p
rodu
ctio
n of
goa
ts f
or1 …
feed
?2he
alth
?3re
prod
ucti
on?
othe
r in
puts
?la
bor?
rent
of
the
equi
pmen
t an
d fa
cilit
ies?
depr
ecia
tion
of
equi
pmen
t an
d fa
cilit
ies?
4
how
muc
h di
d yo
u sp
end
for
othe
r co
ncep
ts?5 1
/ sta
te th
e co
sts
in lo
cal c
urre
ncy.
2/ i
nclu
des
graz
ing,
cut
fodd
er, b
alan
ced
feed
, and
feed
sup
plem
ents
, am
ong
othe
rs, t
hat h
ave
been
pu
rcha
sed.
sub
sequ
ently
, if a
pplic
able
, the
inte
rvie
wer
sho
uld
add
to th
is it
em th
e co
st o
f pro
duct
ion
of
the
feed
pro
duce
d by
the
prod
ucer
him
/her
self
(pro
duct
ion
self-
cons
umpt
ion)
. 3
/ inc
lude
s th
e co
st o
f med
icin
es, v
acci
nes,
and
pay
men
t of v
eter
inar
y se
rvic
es, a
mon
g ot
hers
.4
/ the
dep
reci
atio
n va
lue
will
be
obta
ined
from
the
data
that
are
rec
orde
d in
que
stio
n 77
.5
/ exp
ense
s su
ch a
s sh
ippi
ng, p
arts
, etc
.
2.3.
6 b
ees
35.
In y
our
beek
eepi
ng a
ctiv
ity…
how
man
y do
you
hav
e of
…1
wha
t do
you
est
imat
e as
its
tota
l val
ue?2
1.hi
ves
(box
es)?
2.qu
een
bees
?
1/ i
ndic
ate
the
amou
nt.
2/ s
tate
the
valu
e in
loca
l cur
renc
y.
77Program and Project design
36.
from
Apr
il 20
10 t
o M
arch
201
1, o
f yo
ur p
rodu
ctio
n…
how
muc
h di
d yo
u se
ll in
the
co
untr
y
uni
t of
m
easu
rem
ent1
how
muc
h di
d yo
u se
ll ab
road
uni
t of
m
easu
rem
ent1
how
muc
h di
d yo
u us
e fo
r se
lf-co
nsum
ptio
nu
nit
of
mea
sure
men
t1
at w
hat
pric
e di
d yo
u se
ll…(lo
cal c
urre
ncy/
unit
of m
easu
rem
ent)
for
the
fam
ily
(foo
d)?2
for
prod
uctio
n (in
puts
)?in
the
coun
try?
abro
ad?
1.of
hon
ey?
2.of
roy
al je
lly?
3.of
pol
len?
4.of
wax
?
5.of
oth
er p
rodu
cts?
1/ r
ecor
d th
e co
de a
ccor
ding
to th
e un
its o
f mea
sure
men
t tab
le.
2/ i
f the
pro
duct
ion
was
not
sol
d an
d it
was
use
d fo
r fa
mily
con
sum
ptio
n, a
sk th
e pr
ice
in th
e lo
calit
y or
re
gion
of t
he p
rodu
ct a
nd p
lace
it in
the
spac
e fo
r pr
ice
in th
e co
untr
y.
37.
fro
m A
pril
2010
to
Mar
ch 2
011,
wha
t w
ere
your
cos
ts o
f pr
oduc
tion
for1 …
feed
?2he
alth
?3re
prod
ucti
on?
othe
r in
puts
?la
bor?
rent
of
equi
pmen
t an
d fa
cilit
ies?
depr
ecia
tion
of
equi
pmen
t an
d fa
cilit
ies?
4ot
her
conc
epts
?5 1/ s
tate
the
cost
s in
loca
l cur
renc
y.2
/ inc
lude
s fe
ed s
uppl
emen
ts, a
mon
g ot
hers
.3
/ inc
lude
s th
e co
st o
f med
icin
es, v
acci
nes,
and
pay
men
t of p
rofe
ssio
nal s
ervi
ces,
am
ong
othe
rs.
4/ t
he d
epre
ciat
ion
valu
e w
ill b
e ob
tain
ed fr
om th
e da
ta th
at a
re r
ecor
ded
in q
uest
ion
77.
5/ e
xpen
ses
such
as
ship
ping
, par
ts, e
tc.
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
78
2.3.
7 o
ther
ani
mal
spe
cies
1
1/ a
pply
to s
peci
es o
f pro
duct
ion
inte
rest
.
38.
of
the
anim
als
you
have
…
how
man
y ar
e …
2w
hat
do y
ou e
stim
ate
thei
r to
tal v
alue
is?3
1.ho
rses
?
2.m
ules
?
3.bu
rros
?
4.ra
bbits
?
5.fo
wl,
exce
pt h
ens
and
chic
kens
?1
6.ot
her
anim
als?
1/ s
uch
as d
ucks
, gee
se, t
urke
ys, o
stric
hes,
qua
ils, a
nd o
ther
s.2
/ ind
icat
e th
e nu
mbe
r of
ani
mal
s.3
/ sta
te th
e va
lue
in lo
cal c
urre
ncy.
39.
from
Apr
il 20
10 t
o M
arch
201
1, o
f yo
ur p
rodu
ctio
n…
Spe
cies
how
muc
h di
d yo
u se
ll in
the
cou
ntry
?u
nit
of
mea
sure
men
t1ho
w m
uch
did
you
sell
abro
ad?
uni
t of
m
easu
rem
ent1
how
muc
h di
d yo
u us
e fo
r se
lf-co
nsum
ptio
n?2
uni
t of
m
easu
rem
ent1
at w
hat
pric
e di
d yo
u se
ll…(lo
cal c
urre
ncy/
unit
of m
easu
rem
ent)
in th
e co
untr
y?ab
road
?
1. 2.
1/ r
ecor
d th
e co
de a
ccor
ding
to th
e un
its o
f mea
sure
men
t tab
le.
2/ i
f the
pro
duct
ion
was
not
sol
d an
d it
was
use
d fo
r fa
mily
con
sum
ptio
n, a
sk th
e pr
ice
in th
e lo
calit
y or
re
gion
of t
he p
rodu
ct a
nd p
lace
it in
the
spac
e fo
r pr
ice
in th
e co
untr
y.
79Program and Project design
40.
fro
m A
pril
2010
to
Mar
ch 2
011,
wha
t w
ere
the
cost
s of
pro
duct
ion
for1 …
(Int
ervi
ewer
: K
eep
the
sam
e or
der
of s
peci
es a
s qu
estio
n 39
)
Spe
cies
feed
?2he
alth
?3re
prod
ucti
on?
othe
r in
puts
?la
bor?
rent
of
equi
pmen
t or
fac
iliti
es?
depr
ecia
tion
of
equi
pmen
t an
d fa
cilit
ies?
4ot
her
conc
epts
?5
1. 2.
1/ s
tate
the
cost
s in
loca
l cur
renc
y.2
/ inc
lude
s gr
azin
g, c
ut fo
dder
, bal
ance
d fe
ed, a
nd fe
ed s
uppl
emen
ts, a
mon
g ot
hers
, tha
t hav
e be
en p
urch
ased
. sub
sequ
ently
, if a
pplic
able
, the
in
terv
iew
er s
houl
d ad
d to
this
item
the
cost
of p
rodu
ctio
n of
the
feed
pro
duce
d by
the
prod
ucer
him
/her
self
(pro
duct
ion
self-
cons
umpt
ion)
.3
/ inc
lude
s th
e co
st o
f med
icin
es, v
acci
nes
and
paym
ent o
f vet
erin
ary
serv
ices
, am
ong
othe
rs.
4/ t
he d
epre
ciat
ion
valu
e w
ill b
e ob
tain
ed fr
om th
e da
ta th
at a
re r
ecor
ded
in q
uest
ion
77.
5/ e
xpen
ses
such
as
ship
ping
, par
ts, e
tc.
2.3.
8 c
ompl
emen
tary
que
stio
ns o
n liv
esto
ck a
ctiv
ities
41.
In t
he p
erio
d fr
om A
pril
2010
to
Mar
ch 2
011,
did
you
r pr
oduc
tion
have
any
cer
tific
atio
n1 …
1.fo
r he
alth
con
ditio
ns?
2.fo
r or
gani
c pr
oduc
tion?
3.fo
r fo
od s
afet
y?
4.fo
r an
y ot
her
type
?
1/ m
ark
with
an
x th
e ty
pe o
f cer
tific
atio
n yo
u ha
d, if
app
licab
le.
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
80
42.
from
Apr
il 20
10 t
o M
arch
201
1, w
hat
perc
enta
ge o
f yo
ur p
rodu
ctio
n w
as c
ertif
ied?
Pro
duct
Per
cent
age
of t
he p
rodu
ct c
erti
fied
1.P
ork
2.La
mb
3.c
ow’s
milk
4.eg
gs
5.h
oney
6.o
ther
43.
fro
m A
pril
2010
to
Mar
ch 2
011…
Did
you
rec
eive
a s
ubsi
dy f
or d
iese
l?1
for
how
man
y lit
ers
did
you
rece
ive
the
subs
idy?
how
man
y lit
ers
in t
otal
did
you
use
for
you
r liv
esto
ck a
ctiv
itie
s?
1
/ mar
k w
ith a
n x
if ye
s.
Inte
rvie
wer
: R
ecor
d th
e pr
ice
per
liter
of
dies
el o
n th
e da
te o
f ap
plyi
ng t
he s
urve
y:__
____
____
loca
l cur
renc
y.
44.
fro
m A
pril
2010
to
Mar
ch 2
011,
in y
our
lives
tock
act
ivity…
how
man
y fa
mily
mem
bers
hel
ped
you?
1ho
w m
any
hour
s a
day
on a
vera
ge d
id
they
hel
p yo
u?fo
r ho
w m
any
days
on
aver
age
did
they
he
lp y
ou?
num
ber
of f
amily
day
’s w
ork
used
2h
ow m
uch
does
a d
ay’s
wor
k co
st in
th
e lo
calit
y or
reg
ion?
1/ i
nclu
de th
e pr
oduc
er h
im/h
erse
lf w
hen
such
is th
e ca
se.
2/ i
nter
view
er: i
n th
is c
olum
n th
e re
sult
of m
ultip
lyin
g th
e th
ree
prev
ious
col
umns
and
div
idin
g by
8 s
houl
d be
rec
orde
d.a
day
’s w
ork
is e
quiv
alen
t to
a w
orki
ng d
ay w
hich
usu
ally
last
s fo
r 8
hour
s.Fa
mily
day
´s w
ork
refe
rs to
thos
e fa
mily
mem
bers
who
hel
ped
him
/her
with
out r
ecei
ving
com
pens
atio
n.
81Program and Project design
2.4
aqu
acul
ture
act
iviti
es
45.
from
Apr
il 20
10 t
o M
arch
201
1, a
s a
resu
lt of
you
r aq
uacu
lture
act
ivity,
you
pro
duce
d…
only
prim
ary
prod
ucts
(with
out t
rans
form
atio
n or
pro
cess
ing)
?pr
imar
y pr
oduc
ts a
nd tr
ansf
orm
ed o
r pr
oces
sed
prod
ucts
?1
1
/ app
ly th
e qu
estio
ns o
f thi
s se
ctio
n (2
.4)
and
sect
ion
2.6
Tran
sfor
med
or
proc
esse
d pr
oduc
ts.
46.
from
Apr
il 20
10 t
o M
arch
201
1, in
you
r aq
uacu
lture
act
ivity…
Aqu
acul
ture
sp
ecie
sC
ode1
how
m
any
M3
of
capa
city
do
you
r po
nds
or c
ages
ha
ve?
how
m
any
anim
als
do y
ou
prod
uce
per
M3
of
wat
er?
how
m
any
juve
nile
s di
d yo
u pr
oduc
e in
eac
h pe
riod
?
uni
t of
m
easu
rem
ent2
wha
t qu
anti
ty d
id y
ou s
ell o
n av
erag
e m
onth
ly…
At
wha
t av
erag
e pr
ice
did
you
sell…
(loca
l cur
renc
y/un
it of
mea
sure
men
t)
of a
dult
anim
als…
of ju
veni
les…
juve
nile
s…ad
ult a
nim
als…
in th
e co
untr
y?U
nit o
f m
easu
rem
ent2
abro
ad?
Uni
t of
mea
sure
men
t2in
the
coun
try?
Uni
t of
mea
sure
men
t2ab
road
?U
nit o
f m
easu
rem
ent2
in th
e co
untr
y?ab
road
?in
the
coun
try?
abro
ad?
1. 2. 3. 1
/ see
the
aqua
cultu
re a
nd fi
shin
g sp
ecie
s an
d pr
oduc
ts t
able
.2
/ rec
ord
the
code
acc
ordi
ng to
the
units
of m
easu
rem
ent t
able
.
47.
from
Apr
il 20
10 t
o M
arch
201
1, in
you
r aq
uacu
lture
act
ivity…
Aqu
acul
ture
spe
cies
Cod
e1ho
w m
uch
did
you
sell
as s
port
fis
hing
?u
nit
of m
easu
rem
ent2
at w
hat
pric
e di
d yo
u se
ll yo
ur
spor
t fish
ing
prod
uct?
(loca
l cur
renc
y/U
nit o
f m
easu
rem
ent)
1. 2. 3.
1/ s
ee a
quac
ultu
re a
nd fi
shin
g sp
ecie
s an
d pr
oduc
ts t
able
.2
/ rec
ord
the
code
acc
ordi
ng to
the
units
of m
easu
rem
ent t
able
.
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
82
48.
fro
m A
pril
2010
to
Mar
ch 2
011,
hav
e yo
u in
corp
orat
ed g
enet
ical
ly im
prov
ed a
nim
als
into
you
r aq
uacu
lture
uni
t of
pro
duct
ion?
yes:
(1)
no:
(0)
49.
from
Apr
il 20
10 t
o M
arch
201
1, w
hat
wer
e yo
ur a
vera
ge m
onth
ly c
osts
for
1 …
Aqu
acul
ture
spe
cies
Cod
e2fe
ed?
heal
th?3
extr
acti
on
(har
vest
) of
sp
ecie
s?4
use
of
wat
er?
cons
umpt
ion
of e
lect
rici
ty?
use
of f
uel?
labo
r?re
nt o
f m
achi
nery
, eq
uipm
ent
and
faci
litie
s?
depr
ecia
tion
of
mac
hine
ry,
equi
pmen
t an
d fa
cilit
ies?
5
othe
r ac
tivi
ties
and
in
puts
?6
1. 2. 3.
1/ s
tate
the
cost
s in
loca
l cur
renc
y.2
/ see
aqu
acul
ture
and
fish
ing
spec
ies
and
prod
ucts
tab
le.
3/ i
nclu
des
the
cost
of m
edic
ines
, wat
er a
naly
sis,
spe
cies
ana
lysi
s, a
nd p
aym
ent o
f pro
fess
iona
l ser
vice
s, a
mon
g ot
hers
.4
/ exc
ludi
ng la
bor.
5/ t
he d
epre
ciat
ion
valu
e w
ill b
e ob
tain
ed fr
om th
e da
ta th
at is
rec
orde
d in
que
stio
n 77
.6
/ exp
ense
s su
ch a
s sh
ippi
ng, p
arts
, etc
.
50.
In t
he p
erio
d fr
om A
pril
2010
to
Mar
ch 2
011,
did
you
r aq
uacu
lture
pro
duct
ion
have
any
cer
tific
atio
n1 …
2. fo
r he
alth
?
3. fo
r fo
od s
afet
y?
4. fo
r an
othe
r ty
pe?
1/ m
ark
with
an
x th
e ty
pe o
f cer
tific
atio
n it
had,
if a
ny.
83Program and Project design
51.
from
Apr
il 20
10 t
o M
arch
201
1, w
hat
perc
enta
ge o
f yo
ur a
quac
ultu
re p
rodu
ctio
n w
as c
ertif
ied?
Aqu
acul
ture
spe
cies
Cod
e1P
erce
ntag
e of
the
pro
duct
cer
tifi
ed
1. 2. 3.
1/ s
ee a
quac
ultu
re a
nd fi
shin
g sp
ecie
s ta
ble.
52.
from
Apr
il 20
10 t
o M
arch
201
1, in
you
r aq
uacu
lture
act
ivity…
how
man
y fa
mily
m
embe
rs h
elpe
d yo
u?1
how
man
y ho
urs
a da
y on
av
erag
e di
d th
ey h
elp
you?
during
how
man
y da
ys o
n av
erag
e di
d th
ey h
elp
you?
2n
umbe
r of
fam
ily d
ay’s
wor
k us
edh
ow m
uch
does
a d
ay’s
wor
k co
st in
the
lo
calit
y or
reg
ion?
1/ i
nclu
de th
e pr
oduc
er h
im/h
erse
lf w
hen
such
is th
e ca
se.
2/ I
nter
view
er: i
n th
is c
olum
n th
e re
sult
of m
ultip
lyin
g th
e th
ree
prev
ious
col
umns
and
div
idin
g by
8 s
houl
d be
rec
orde
d.a
day
’s w
ork
is e
quiv
alen
t to
a w
orki
ng d
ay w
hich
usu
ally
last
s fo
r 8
hour
s.Fa
mily
day
’s w
ork
refe
rs to
thos
e fa
mily
mem
bers
who
hel
ped
him
/her
with
out r
ecei
ving
rem
uner
atio
n.
2.5
fish
ing
activ
ities
53.
from
Apr
il 20
10 t
o M
arch
201
1, a
s a
resu
lt of
you
r fis
hing
act
ivity,
did
you
pro
duce
…
only
prim
ary
prod
ucts
(with
out t
rans
form
atio
n or
pro
cess
ing)
?pr
imar
y pr
oduc
ts a
nd tr
ansf
orm
ed o
r pr
oces
sed
prod
ucts
?1
1
/ app
ly th
e qu
estio
ns o
f thi
s se
ctio
n (2
.5)
and
sect
ion
2.6
Tran
sfor
med
or
proc
esse
d pr
oduc
ts.
54.
fro
m A
pril
2010
to
Mar
ch 2
011,
wha
t ty
pe o
f fis
hing
did
you
do?
coa
stal
hig
h se
a
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
84
55.
from
Apr
il 20
10 t
o M
arch
201
1, in
you
r fis
hing
act
ivity…
wha
t w
ere
the
prin
cipa
l sp
ecie
s yo
u ex
trac
ted?
Cod
e1ho
w
muc
h w
as
extr
acte
d?
uni
t of
m
easu
rem
ent2
of t
he a
mou
nt e
xtra
cted
, ho
w m
uch
did
you
sell.
..at
wha
t pr
ice
did
you
sell
your
pro
duct
…(lo
cal c
urre
ncy/
unit
of m
easu
rem
ent)
in th
e co
untr
y?U
nit o
f m
easu
rem
ent2
abro
ad?
Uni
t of
mea
sure
men
t2in
the
coun
try?
abro
ad?
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
1/ s
ee a
quac
ultu
re a
nd fi
sh s
peci
es a
nd p
rodu
cts
tabl
e.2
/ rec
ord
the
code
acc
ordi
ng to
the
units
of m
easu
rem
ent t
able
.
56.
from
Apr
il 20
10 t
o M
arch
201
1, w
hat
wer
e yo
ur c
osts
for
1 …
fish
spe
cies
Cod
e2fu
el?
labo
r?re
nt o
f eq
uipm
ent
and
faci
litie
s?
depr
ecia
tion
of
equi
pmen
t an
d fa
cilit
ies?
3
paym
ent
of m
arin
e se
rvic
es?
repa
irs
of m
achi
nery
an
d eq
uipm
ent?
othe
r ac
tivi
ties
and
inpu
ts?4
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
1/ s
tate
the
cost
s in
loca
l cur
renc
y.2
/ see
aqu
acul
ture
and
fish
spe
cies
and
pro
duct
s ta
ble.
3/ t
he d
epre
ciat
ion
valu
e w
ill b
e ob
tain
ed fr
om th
e da
ta th
at is
rec
orde
d in
que
stio
n 77
.4
/ exp
ense
s su
ch a
s sh
ippi
ng, p
arts
, etc
.
85Program and Project design
57.
In t
he p
erio
d fr
om A
pril
2010
to
Mar
ch 2
011,
did
you
r fis
h pr
oduc
ts h
ave
any
cert
ifica
tion…
1. fo
r en
viro
nmen
tal s
ervi
ces?
2. fo
r fo
od s
afet
y?
3. fo
r an
y ot
her
type
?
1/ m
ark
with
an
x th
e ty
pe o
f cer
tific
atio
n it
had,
if a
ny.
58.
from
Apr
il 20
10 t
o M
arch
201
1, w
hat
perc
enta
ge o
f yo
ur f
ish
prod
ucts
wer
e ce
rtifi
ed?
fish
spe
cies
Cod
e1P
erce
ntag
e of
the
pro
duct
cer
tifi
ed
1. 2. 3.
1
/ see
aqu
acul
ture
and
fish
spe
cies
tab
le.
59.
from
Apr
il 20
10 t
o M
arch
201
1…
Did
you
rec
eive
sub
sidi
es f
or d
iese
l to
fuel
yo
ur b
oat?
1fo
r ho
w m
any
liter
s di
d yo
u re
ceiv
e th
e su
bsid
y?W
hat
was
the
tot
al a
mou
nt o
f su
bsid
ized
die
sel
that
you
use
d fo
r yo
ur f
ishi
ng a
ctiv
itie
s?
1
/ mar
k w
ith a
n x
if af
firm
ativ
e.
Inte
rvie
wer
: R
ecor
d th
e pr
ice
per
liter
of
subs
idiz
ed d
iese
l as
of t
he d
ate
of t
akin
g th
e su
rvey
: __
____
____
loca
l cur
renc
y.
Did
you
rec
eive
sub
sidi
es f
or g
asol
ine
to
fuel
you
r bo
at?1
for
how
man
y lit
ers
did
you
rece
ive
the
subs
idy?
Wha
t w
as t
he t
otal
am
ount
of
subs
idiz
ed g
asol
ine
that
you
use
d fo
r yo
ur f
ishi
ng a
ctiv
itie
s?
1/ m
ark
with
an
x if
affir
mat
ive.
Inte
rvie
wer
: R
ecor
d th
e pr
ice
per
liter
of
subs
idiz
ed g
asol
ine
as o
f th
e da
te o
f ta
king
the
sur
vey:
___
____
___
loca
l cur
renc
y.
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
86
60.
from
Apr
il 20
10 t
o M
arch
201
1, in
you
r fis
hing
act
ivity…
how
man
y fa
mily
m
embe
rs h
elpe
d yo
u?1
how
man
y ho
urs
per
day
on a
vera
ge d
id
they
hel
p yo
u?
for
how
man
y da
ys o
n av
erag
e di
d th
ey h
elp
you?
num
ber
of f
amily
day
’s
wor
k us
ed2
how
muc
h do
es a
day
’s w
ork
cost
in t
he
loca
lity
or r
egio
n?
1/ i
nclu
de th
e pr
oduc
er h
im/h
erse
lf, if
suc
h is
the
case
.2
/ Int
ervi
ewer
: in
this
col
umn
the
resu
lt of
mul
tiply
ing
the
thre
e pr
evio
us c
olum
ns a
nd d
ivid
ing
by 8
sho
uld
be r
ecor
ded.
a d
ay’s
wor
k is
equ
ival
ent t
o a
wor
king
day
whi
ch u
sual
ly la
sts
for
8 ho
urs.
Fam
ily d
ay’s
wor
k re
fers
to th
ose
fam
ily m
embe
rs w
ho h
elpe
d hi
m/h
er w
ithou
t rec
eivi
ng c
ompe
nsat
ion.
2.6
tran
sfor
med
or
proc
esse
d pr
oduc
ts
61.
from
Apr
il 20
10 t
o M
arch
201
1, d
id y
ou t
rans
form
or
proc
ess
prim
ary
prod
ucts
…
from
agr
icul
ture
?1fr
om li
vest
ock?
2fr
om a
quac
ultu
re a
nd/o
r fis
hing
?3
1
/ go
to q
uest
ion
62.
2/ g
o to
que
stio
n 6
4.3
/ go
to q
uest
ion
66.
2.6.
1 tr
ansf
orm
ed o
r pr
oces
sed
agric
ultu
ral p
rodu
cts
62.
from
201
0 t
o M
arch
201
1…
wha
t ty
pe o
f pr
oces
sed
prod
ucts
did
yo
u ob
tain
?C
ode1
how
muc
h pr
oces
sed
prod
uct
did
you
obta
in?
uni
t of
m
easu
rem
ent2
from
the
pro
cess
ed p
rodu
ctio
n ob
tain
ed,
wha
t am
ount
did
you
se
ll ...
At
wha
t pr
ice
did
you
sell
your
pr
oduc
ts…
(loca
l cur
renc
y/un
it of
mea
sure
men
t)
in th
e co
untr
y?U
nit o
f m
easu
rem
ent2
abro
ad?
Uni
t of
mea
sure
men
t2in
the
coun
try?
abro
ad?
1. 2. 3. 4.
1/ s
ee tr
ansf
orm
ed o
r pr
oces
sed
prod
ucts
tab
le.
2/ r
ecor
d th
e co
de a
ccor
ding
to th
e un
its o
f mea
sure
men
t tab
le.
87Program and Project design
63.
for
the
tran
sfor
med
or
proc
esse
d pr
oduc
ts y
ou o
btai
ned
from
Apr
il 20
10 t
o M
arch
201
1, w
hat
wer
e yo
ur a
vera
ge m
onth
ly c
osts
for
1 …
Pro
cess
ed p
rodu
ctC
ode2
raw
m
ater
ials
?3la
bor?
fuel
?el
ectr
icit
y co
nsum
ptio
n?w
ater
co
nsum
ptio
n?ot
her
inpu
ts?4
ship
ping
?
rent
of
mac
hine
ry,
equi
pmen
t an
d fa
cilit
ies?
depr
ecia
tion
of
mac
hine
ry,
equi
pmen
t an
d fa
cilit
ies?
5
how
muc
h di
d yo
u sp
end
on
othe
r it
ems?
1. 2. 3. 4.
1/ s
tate
cos
ts in
loca
l cur
renc
y.2
/ see
tran
sfor
med
or
proc
esse
d pr
oduc
ts t
able
.3
/ suc
h as
gra
in, f
ruit,
veg
etab
les,
am
ong
othe
r ag
ricul
tura
l pro
duct
s, p
urch
ased
. sub
sequ
ently
, if a
pplic
able
, th
e in
terv
iew
er s
houl
d ad
d to
this
item
the
cost
of p
rodu
ctio
n of
the
raw
mat
eria
ls p
rodu
ced
by th
e pr
oduc
er
him
/her
self
(pro
duct
ion
self-
cons
umpt
ion)
.4
/ inc
lude
the
cost
s of
mat
eria
ls s
uch
as b
oxes
, pla
stic
s, w
ires,
am
ong
othe
rs.
5/ t
he d
epre
ciat
ion
valu
e w
ill b
e ob
tain
ed fr
om th
e da
ta th
at is
rec
orde
d in
que
stio
n 77
.
2.6.
2 tr
ansf
orm
ed o
r pr
oces
sed
agric
ultu
ral p
rodu
cts
64.
fro
m A
pril
2010
to
Mar
ch 2
011…
Wha
t ty
pe o
f pr
oces
sed
prod
ucts
di
d yo
u ob
tain
?C
ode1
how
muc
h pr
oces
sed
prod
uct
did
you
obta
in?
uni
t of
m
easu
rem
ent2
of t
he p
roce
ssed
pro
duct
ion
obta
ined
, ho
w m
uch
did
you
sell
...at
wha
t pr
ice
did
you
sell
your
pr
oduc
ts…
(loca
l cur
renc
y/un
it of
mea
sure
men
t)
in th
e co
untr
y?U
nit o
f m
easu
rem
ent2
abro
ad?
Uni
t of
mea
sure
men
t2in
the
coun
try?
abro
ad?
1. 2. 3. 4.
1/ s
ee tr
ansf
orm
ed o
r pr
oces
sed
prod
ucts
tab
le.
2/ r
ecor
d th
e co
de a
ccor
ding
to th
e un
its o
f mea
sure
men
t tab
le.
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
88
65.
of
the
tran
sfor
med
or
proc
esse
d pr
oduc
ts y
ou o
btai
ned
from
Apr
il 201
0 t
o M
arch
201
1, w
hat
wer
e th
e av
erag
e m
onth
ly c
osts
yo
u ha
d fo
r1…
Pro
cess
ed p
rodu
ctC
ode2
raw
m
ater
ials
?3la
bor?
fuel
?el
ectr
icit
y co
nsum
ptio
n?w
ater
co
nsum
ptio
n?ot
her
inpu
ts?4
ship
ping
?
rent
of
mac
hine
ry,
equi
pmen
t an
d fa
cilit
ies?
depr
ecia
tion
of
mac
hine
ry,
equi
pmen
t an
d fa
cilit
ies?
5
how
muc
h di
d yo
u sp
end
on
othe
r it
ems?
1. 2. 3. 4.
1/ s
tate
the
cost
s in
loca
l cur
renc
y.2
/ see
tran
sfor
med
or
proc
esse
d pr
oduc
ts t
able
.3
/ suc
h as
milk
, ani
mal
s, s
kins
, oils
, hon
ey, a
nd w
ool,
amon
g ot
hers
, pur
chas
ed. s
ubse
quen
tly, i
f app
licab
le,
the
inte
rvie
wer
sho
uld
add
to th
is it
em th
e co
st o
f pro
duct
ion
of th
e ra
w m
ater
ials
pro
duce
d by
the
prod
ucer
hi
m/h
erse
lf (p
rodu
ctio
n se
lf-co
nsum
ptio
n).
4/ i
nclu
de th
e co
sts
of m
ater
ials
suc
h as
box
es, p
last
ics,
wire
, am
ong
othe
rs.
5/ t
he d
epre
ciat
ion
valu
e w
ill b
e ob
tain
ed fr
om th
e da
ta th
at a
re r
ecor
ded
in q
uest
ion
77.
2.6.
3 tr
ansf
orm
ed o
r pr
oces
sed
aqua
cultu
re a
nd/o
r fis
h pr
oduc
ts
66.
from
Apr
il 20
10 t
o M
arch
201
1…
Wha
t ty
pe o
f pr
oces
sed
prod
ucts
di
d yo
u ob
tain
?C
ode1
how
muc
h pr
oces
sed
prod
uct
did
you
obta
in?
uni
t of
m
easu
rem
ent2
of
the
proc
esse
d pr
oduc
tion
obt
aine
d, h
ow m
uch
did
you
sell.
..At
wha
t pr
ice
did
you
sell
your
pr
oduc
ts…
(loca
l cur
renc
y/un
it of
mea
sure
men
t)
in th
e co
untr
y?U
nit o
f m
easu
rem
ent2
abro
ad?
Uni
t of
mea
sure
men
t2in
the
coun
try?
abro
ad?
1. 2. 3. 4.
1/ s
ee tr
ansf
orm
ed o
r pr
oces
sed
prod
ucts
tab
le.
2/ r
ecor
d th
e co
de a
ccor
ding
to th
e un
its o
f mea
sure
men
t tab
le.
89Program and Project design
67.
of
the
tran
sfor
med
or
proc
esse
d pr
oduc
ts y
ou o
btai
ned
from
Apr
il 20
10 t
o M
arch
201
1, w
hat
wer
e th
e av
erag
e m
onth
ly c
osts
you
ha
d fo
r1 …
Pro
cess
ed p
rodu
ctC
ode2
raw
m
ater
ials
?3la
bor?
fuel
?el
ectr
icit
y co
nsum
ptio
n?w
ater
co
nsum
ptio
n?ot
her
inpu
ts?4
ship
ping
?
rent
of
mac
hine
ry,
equi
pmen
t an
d fa
cilit
ies?
depr
ecia
tion
of
mac
hine
ry,
equi
pmen
t an
d fa
cilit
ies?
5
how
muc
h di
d yo
u sp
end
on
othe
r it
ems?
1. 2. 3. 4.
1/ s
tate
the
cost
s in
loca
l cur
renc
y.2
/ see
tran
sfor
med
pro
duct
s ta
ble.
3/ r
efer
s to
the
aqua
cultu
re a
nd/o
r fis
h sp
ecie
s th
at a
re tr
ansf
orm
ed.
4/ i
nclu
de th
e co
sts
of m
ater
ials
suc
h as
box
es, p
last
ics,
wire
, am
ong
othe
rs.
5/ t
he d
epre
ciat
ion
valu
e w
ill b
e ob
tain
ed fr
om th
e da
ta th
at a
re r
ecor
ded
in q
uest
ion
77.
2.6.
4 c
ompl
emen
tary
que
stio
ns
68.
In t
he p
erio
d fr
om A
pril
2010
to
Mar
ch 2
011,
did
you
r pr
oduc
tion
have
any
cer
tific
atio
n1 …
1. fo
r fo
od s
afet
y?
2. fo
r en
viro
nmen
tal s
ervi
ces?
3. fo
r or
gani
c pr
oduc
t?
4. fo
r an
y ot
her
type
?
1
/ mar
k w
ith a
n x
the
type
of c
ertif
icat
e yo
u ha
d, if
app
licab
le.
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
90
69.
from
Apr
il 20
10 t
o M
arch
201
1, w
hat
perc
enta
ge o
f yo
ur p
rodu
ctio
n w
as c
ertif
ied?
Pro
duct
Cod
e1P
erce
ntag
e of
pro
duct
ce
rtif
ied
1. 2. 3.
1/ s
ee tr
ansf
orm
ed o
r pr
oces
sed
prod
ucts
tab
le.
70.
from
Apr
il 20
10 t
o M
arch
201
1, in
the
tra
nsfo
rmat
ion
or p
roce
ssin
g of
you
r pr
oduc
ts…
how
man
y fa
mily
mem
bers
he
lped
you
?1ho
w m
any
hour
s a
day
on a
vera
ge d
id
they
hel
p yo
u?fo
r ho
w m
any
days
on
aver
age
did
they
hel
p yo
u?n
umbe
r of
fam
ily d
ay’s
wor
k us
ed2
how
muc
h do
es a
day
’s w
ork
cost
in t
he lo
calit
y or
re
gion
?
1/ i
nclu
de th
e pr
oduc
er h
im/h
erse
lf, if
suc
h is
the
case
.2
/ Int
ervi
ewer
: in
this
col
umn
you
shou
ld r
ecor
d th
e re
sults
of m
ultip
lyin
g th
e th
ree
prev
ious
col
umns
and
div
idin
g by
8.
a d
ay’s
wor
k is
equ
ival
ent t
o on
e w
orki
ng d
ay w
hich
nor
mal
ly is
8 h
ours
.Fa
mily
day
’s w
ork
refe
rs to
thos
e fa
mily
mem
bers
that
hel
ped
him
/her
with
out r
ecei
ving
any
com
pens
atio
n.
2.7
fore
stry
and
gat
herin
g ac
tiviti
es
71.
from
Apr
il 20
10 t
o M
arch
201
1…
wha
t sp
ecie
s or
pro
duct
s di
d yo
u m
ake
use
of a
nd/o
r ga
ther
?C
ode1
wha
t la
nd
area
did
you
m
ake
use
of?
(if a
pplic
able
)
uni
t of
m
easu
rem
ent2
how
muc
h di
d yo
u cu
t an
d/or
ga
ther
?
uni
t of
m
easu
rem
ent2
of
the
amou
nt c
ut a
nd/o
r ga
ther
ed…
at w
hat
pric
e di
d yo
u se
ll yo
ur p
rodu
ct?
(loca
l cur
renc
y/un
it of
mea
sure
men
t)ho
w m
uch
did
you
sell?
Uni
t of
mea
sure
men
t2
how
muc
h di
d yo
u us
e fo
r se
lf-co
nsum
ptio
n?3
Uni
t of
mea
sure
men
t2
1. 2. 3.
1/ s
ee fo
rest
ry a
nd c
olle
ctio
n sp
ecie
s an
d pr
oduc
ts t
able
.2
/ rec
ord
the
code
acc
ordi
ng to
the
units
of m
easu
rem
ent t
able
.3
/ if h
e/sh
e di
d no
t sel
l his
/her
pro
duct
ion
writ
e in
this
spa
ce th
e am
ount
con
sum
ed a
nd, i
n ad
ditio
n, a
sk th
e pr
ice
in th
e lo
calit
y or
reg
ion
of th
e pr
oduc
t con
sum
ed w
ritin
g it
in th
e sp
ace
corr
espo
ndin
g to
the
sale
pric
e.
91Program and Project design
72.
from
Apr
il 20
10 t
o M
arch
201
1, w
hat
wer
e yo
ur c
osts
for
…
(Int
ervi
ewer
: K
eep
the
sam
e or
der
of s
peci
es o
r pr
oduc
ts a
s in
que
stio
n 71
)1
Spe
cies
or
prod
uct
Cod
e2es
tabl
ishm
ent
of y
our
plan
tati
on?
(if a
pplic
able
)
mai
nten
ance
of
the
plan
tati
on
(pru
ning
, hea
lth, w
eed
cont
rol,
amon
g ot
hers
)?cu
ttin
g an
d/or
col
lect
ion?
othe
r co
sts
1. 2. 3.
1/ s
tate
the
cost
s in
loca
l cur
renc
y.2
/ see
fore
stry
and
gat
herin
g sp
ecie
s an
d pr
oduc
ts t
able
.
73.
from
Apr
il 20
10 t
o M
arch
201
1, in
the
use
and
/or
gath
erin
g of
you
r pr
oduc
ts…
how
man
y fa
mily
mem
bers
he
lped
you
?1ho
w m
any
hour
s a
day
on
aver
age
did
they
hel
p yo
u?fo
r ho
w m
any
days
on
aver
age
did
they
hel
p yo
u?n
umbe
r of
fam
ily d
ay’s
w
ork
used
2
how
muc
h do
es a
day
’s
wor
k co
st in
you
r lo
calit
y or
reg
ion?
1/ i
nclu
de th
e pr
oduc
er h
im/h
erse
lf, if
suc
h is
the
case
.2
/ Int
ervi
ewer
: in
this
col
umn
you
shou
ld r
ecor
d th
e re
sults
of m
ultip
lyin
g th
e th
ree
prev
ious
col
umns
and
div
idin
g by
8.
a d
ay’s
wor
k is
equ
ival
ent t
o on
e w
orki
ng d
ay w
hich
nor
mal
ly is
8 h
ours
.Fa
mily
day
’s w
ork
refe
rs to
thos
e fa
mily
mem
bers
that
hel
ped
him
/her
with
out r
ecei
ving
any
com
pens
atio
n.
2.8
non
-agr
icul
tura
l rur
al a
ctiv
ities
74.
from
201
0 t
o M
arch
201
1,…
wha
t ty
pe o
f no
n-ag
ricu
ltur
al a
ctiv
ity
did
you
do?
Cod
e1
how
muc
h w
ere
your
sal
es…
in t
he c
ount
ry…
abro
ad?
to in
term
edia
ries?
to th
e fin
al c
onsu
mer
?
1. 2. 3.
1/ s
ee n
on-a
gric
ultu
ral a
ctiv
ities
tab
le.
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
92
75.
In y
our
non-
agric
ultu
ral a
ctiv
ities
tha
t yo
u di
d fr
om A
pril
2010
to
Mar
ch 2
011,
wha
t w
ere
your
ave
rage
mon
thly
cos
ts f
or1 …
non
-agr
icul
tura
l act
ivit
yC
ode2
raw
mat
eria
ls?3
labo
r?el
ectr
icit
y co
nsum
ptio
n?w
ater
co
nsum
ptio
n?sh
ippi
ng?
rent
of
mac
hine
ry,
equi
pmen
t an
d fa
cilit
ies?
depr
ecia
tion
of
mac
hine
ry,
equi
pmen
t an
d fa
cilit
ies?
4
how
muc
h di
d yo
u sp
end
on
othe
r ac
tivi
ties
and
inpu
ts?
1. 2. 3.
1/ s
tate
the
cost
s in
loca
l cur
renc
y.2
/ see
non
-agr
icul
tura
l rur
al a
ctiv
ities
tab
le.
3/ i
nclu
de th
e ra
w m
ater
ials
pur
chas
ed. s
ubse
quen
tly, i
f app
licab
le, t
he in
terv
iew
er s
houl
d ad
d to
this
item
the
cost
of
prod
uctio
n of
the
raw
mat
eria
ls p
rodu
ced
by th
e pr
oduc
er h
im/h
erse
lf.4
/ the
dep
reci
atio
n va
lue
will
be
obta
ined
from
the
data
that
are
rec
orde
d in
que
stio
n 77
.
76.
from
Apr
il 20
10 t
o M
arch
201
1, in
car
ryin
g ou
t yo
ur n
on-a
gric
ultu
ral a
ctiv
ity…
how
man
y fa
mily
m
embe
rs h
elpe
d yo
u?1
how
man
y ho
urs
a da
y on
ave
rage
did
the
y he
lp y
ou?
for
how
man
y da
ys o
n av
erag
e di
d th
ey h
elp
you?
num
ber
of f
amily
day
’s
wor
k us
ed2
how
muc
h do
es a
day
’s w
ork
cost
in
the
loca
lity
or r
egio
n?
1/ i
nclu
de th
e pr
oduc
er h
im/h
erse
lf, if
suc
h is
the
case
.2
/ Int
ervi
ewer
: in
this
col
umn
you
shou
ld r
ecor
d th
e re
sults
of m
ultip
lyin
g th
e th
ree
prev
ious
col
umns
and
div
idin
g by
8.
a d
ay’s
wor
k is
equ
ival
ent t
o on
e w
orki
ng d
ay w
hich
nor
mal
ly is
8 h
ours
.Fa
mily
day
’s w
ork
refe
rs to
thos
e fa
mily
mem
bers
that
hel
ped
him
/her
with
out r
ecei
ving
any
com
pens
atio
n.
93Program and Project design
2.9
farm
ass
ets
in th
e un
it of
pro
duct
ion
77.
of
the
follo
win
g fa
rm a
sset
s…
AS
SE
TC
ode1
you
are
owne
r of
…2
how
man
y un
its
do y
ou h
ave?
(if
appl
icab
le)
in w
hat
year
did
yo
u pu
rcha
se,
build
or
esta
blis
h it
?3
how
muc
h di
d it
cos
t?
(in lo
cal
curr
ency
)4
how
muc
h do
yo
u es
tim
ate
its
valu
e to
be
?4
If t
he a
sset
pur
chas
ed
was
use
d, h
ow m
any
year
s of
use
did
it
have
?3
InfR
ASTR
uC
TuR
E A
nD
fAC
IlIT
IES
1.w
areh
ouse
s an
d st
orag
e ar
eas4 ?
2.o
ffic
es?
3.g
reen
hous
e in
stal
latio
ns?
1___
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
__
2__
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
___
3__
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
___
4.ir
rigat
ion
syst
ems?
1___
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
__
2__
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
___
5.c
orra
ls?4
6.m
ilkin
g pa
rlor?
7.P
oultr
y ho
uses
?4
8.P
ig in
stal
latio
ns?4
9.P
onds
?4
10.
Pac
king
pla
nt (f
acili
ty)?
11.
col
d ro
om?
12.
wor
k pl
ace
(non
-agr
icul
tura
l act
ivity
)?13
.o
ther
(spe
cify
):__
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
_14
.o
ther
(spe
cify
):__
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
_15
.o
ther
(spe
cify
):__
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
_
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
94
AS
SE
TC
ode1
you
are
owne
r of
…2
how
man
y un
its
do y
ou h
ave?
(if
appl
icab
le)
in w
hat
year
did
yo
u pu
rcha
se,
build
or
esta
blis
h it
?3
how
muc
h di
d it
cos
t?
(in lo
cal
curr
ency
)4
how
muc
h do
yo
u es
tim
ate
its
valu
e to
be
?4
If t
he a
sset
pur
chas
ed
was
use
d, h
ow m
any
year
s of
use
did
it
have
?3
16.
oth
er (s
peci
fy):
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
___
MAC
hIn
ERy
An
D E
Qu
IPM
EnT
17.
trac
tors
?
1___
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
__
2__
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
___
18.
agr
icul
tura
l im
plem
ents
?4
19.
thre
sher
and
har
vest
er?
20.
milk
ing
mac
hine
s?4
21.
coo
ling
tank
s?4
22.
feed
ing
trou
ghs?
4
23.
scal
e?24
.in
sem
inat
ion
equi
pmen
t?25
.fo
od m
ixer
?26
.c
ages
?4
27.
trai
lers
?4
28.
Pum
ps (w
ater
, oxy
gen,
air)
?4
29.
fish
ing
gear
?4
30.
fish
ing
boat
s?
1___
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
__
2__
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
___
3__
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
___
31.
mac
hine
ry a
nd e
quip
men
t for
pac
kagi
ng o
r pr
oces
sing
?4
32.
mac
hine
ry a
nd e
quip
men
t for
non
-agr
icul
tura
l act
iviti
es4
33.
oth
er (s
peci
fy):
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
___
95Program and Project design
AS
SE
TC
ode1
you
are
owne
r of
…2
how
man
y un
its
do y
ou h
ave?
(if
appl
icab
le)
in w
hat
year
did
yo
u pu
rcha
se,
build
or
esta
blis
h it
?3
how
muc
h di
d it
cos
t?
(in lo
cal
curr
ency
)4
how
muc
h do
yo
u es
tim
ate
its
valu
e to
be
?4
If t
he a
sset
pur
chas
ed
was
use
d, h
ow m
any
year
s of
use
did
it
have
?3
34.
oth
er (s
peci
fy):
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
___
35.
oth
er (s
peci
fy):
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
___
36.
oth
er (s
peci
fy):
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
___
ME
An
S o
f TR
An
SPo
RTA
TIo
n
37.
truc
k?38
.Li
ght t
ruck
?39
.tr
aile
r?4
0.o
ther
(spe
cify
):__
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
_41
.o
ther
(spe
cify
):__
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
____
_
1/ s
ee a
sset
s ta
ble.
2/ i
ndic
ate
with
an
x if
the
inte
rvie
wee
pos
sess
es th
e as
set i
ndic
ated
.3
/ if t
he in
terv
iew
ee h
as m
ore
than
one
uni
t of t
his
type
of a
sset
, in
this
col
umn
reco
rd o
nly
the
info
rmat
ion
abou
t the
prin
cipa
l ass
et (o
f gre
ates
t val
ue)
or w
rite
the
aver
age
num
ber
whe
n al
l the
ass
ets
have
bee
n pu
rcha
sed
or b
uilt
in th
e sa
me
year
and
hav
e th
e sa
me
year
s of
use
at t
he ti
me
of p
urch
ase.
4/ i
f the
inte
rvie
wee
pos
sess
es m
ore
than
one
ass
et, r
ecor
d th
e to
tal (
sum
) co
st o
r va
lue
of th
e as
sets
.
III. o
ther
inco
me
78.
from
Apr
il 20
10 t
o M
arch
201
1…
did
you
have
add
itio
nal i
ncom
e to
wha
t yo
u ob
tain
ed in
you
r un
it o
f pr
oduc
tion
for
…1
how
muc
h m
oney
did
you
rec
eive
on
aver
age
mon
thly
?fo
r ho
w m
any
mon
ths
did
you
rece
ive
the
mon
ey?
1.su
ppor
t fro
m fa
mily
mem
bers
who
live
out
of t
he c
ount
ry?
2.su
ppor
t fro
m fa
mily
mem
bers
who
live
in th
e co
untr
y?
3.em
ploy
men
t out
side
of y
our
prod
uctio
n un
it?
4.re
nt o
f lan
d an
d/or
oth
er a
sset
s?
5.an
y ot
her?
1/ m
ark
with
an
x if
the
inte
rvie
wee
rec
eive
s th
e in
com
e in
dica
ted.
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
96
IV. g
over
nmen
t as
sist
ance
11
79.
from
Apr
il 20
10 t
o M
arch
201
1…
Pro
gram
sw
ere
you
a be
nefi
ciar
y of
or
did
you
rece
ive
aid
from
…1
Wha
t w
as t
he a
mou
nt o
f ai
d th
at y
ou r
ecei
ved?
(in lo
cal c
urre
ncy)
how
man
y tim
es d
id y
ou r
ecei
ve t
he a
id in
the
in
dica
ted
peri
od?
PRo
gR
AM
S o
f Th
E M
InIS
TRy
of
AgR
ICu
lTu
RE
2
1.P
rogr
am o
f sup
port
for
purc
hase
of i
nput
s
2.P
rogr
am fo
r ru
ral d
evel
opm
ent
3.h
ydro
-agr
icul
ture
pro
gram
4.P
rogr
am to
sup
port
pro
duct
ion
proj
ects
5.P
rogr
am to
sup
port
wom
en in
agr
icul
ture
oTh
ER g
oVE
Rn
MEn
TAl
PRo
gR
AM
S
6.st
ate
prog
ram
s
7.m
unic
ipal
pro
gram
s
8.o
ther
9.
oth
er
1/ i
ndic
ate
with
an
x if
the
inte
rvie
wee
is b
enef
icia
ry o
f the
indi
cate
d pr
ogra
m.
2/ I
nter
view
er: i
f the
inte
rvie
wee
is b
enef
icia
ry o
f a p
rogr
am o
f the
min
istr
y of
agr
icul
ture
, he/
she
shou
ld a
lso
answ
er s
ectio
n vi
i.
V. f
inan
cial
ser
vice
s80
. fr
om A
pril
2010
to
Mar
ch 2
011,
did
you
rec
eive
any
loan
s fo
r ca
rryi
ng o
ut a
gric
ultu
ral,
aqua
cultu
re, fis
hing
and
/or
othe
r pr
oduc
tion
activ
ities
in t
he r
ural
sec
tor?
yes:
(1)
no:
(0)
i
f no,
go
to q
uest
ion
83.
11
each
cou
ntry
has
its
own
prog
ram
s, s
o he
re r
efer
ence
is m
ade
only
to s
ome
exam
ples
.
97Program and Project design
81.
In
rela
tion
to t
he lo
an y
ou r
ecei
ved…
how
muc
h w
as t
he a
mou
nt r
ecei
ved?
wha
t in
stit
utio
n ga
ve y
ou t
he lo
an?1
1. P
ublic
rur
al b
ank
2. P
rivat
e ba
nk
3. c
redi
t Uni
on, s
avin
gs b
ank,
sav
ings
and
Loa
n
coo
pera
tive
or o
ther
fina
ncia
l bro
ker
1/ m
ark
with
an
x.
82.
The
loan
rec
eive
d w
as u
sed
for1 .
..
1. t
he p
urch
ase
of in
puts
for
yo
ur a
ctiv
ity?
2. th
e ac
quis
itio
n of
mac
hine
ry
and/
or e
quip
men
t?3.
the
con
stru
ctio
n of
infr
astr
uctu
re
or f
acili
ties
?4.
the
purc
hase
of
an
imal
s?5.
the
esta
blis
hmen
t or
pur
chas
e
of
plan
tati
ons?
26.
acqu
irin
g so
me
othe
r ty
pe o
f
as
sets
?
1/ m
ark
with
an
x th
e ite
m o
r co
ncep
t for
whi
ch th
e lo
an h
as b
een
used
.
VI. A
gro-
food
and
fis
hing
info
rmat
ion,
tec
hnol
ogic
al in
nova
tion,
mar
kets
and
tra
inin
g
83.
fro
m A
pril
2010
to
Mar
ch 2
011,
did
you
rec
eive
, as
k fo
r or
hav
e ac
cess
to
any
type
of
info
rmat
ion
on t
he a
gro-
food
and
fis
hing
sec
tor
prov
ided
by
the
Min
istr
y of
Agr
icul
ture
rel
ated
to
your
pro
duct
ion
activ
ity?
yes:
(1)
no:
(0)
if no
, go
to q
uest
ion
85.
84.
The
info
rmat
ion
you
used
fro
m t
he M
inis
try
of A
gric
ultu
re…
was
it e
asy
to a
cces
s?
was
it u
sefu
l?w
as it
ava
ilabl
e in
a t
imel
y m
anne
r?2
yes:
(1)_
____
n
o:(0
)___
___
yes:
(1)_
____
n
o:(0
)___
___
yes:
(1)_
____
n
o:(0
)___
___
1/ m
ark
with
an
x.
2/ t
his
refe
rs to
whe
ther
the
info
rmat
ion
was
ava
ilabl
e at
the
time
the
prod
ucer
req
uest
ed o
r ne
eded
it.
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
98
85.
In t
he p
erio
d in
dica
ted,
hav
e yo
u co
nsul
ted
any
stud
y or
ana
lysi
s th
at p
rovi
des
you
with
info
rmat
ion
on t
he p
ossi
bilit
ies
of d
evel
opm
ent
in t
he a
gro-
food
sec
tor,
use
of n
ew t
echn
olog
ies,
mar
ket
oppo
rtun
ities
, am
ong
othe
r as
pect
s?
yes:
(1)
no:
(0)
86.
from
Apr
il 20
10 t
o M
arch
201
1, d
id y
ou r
ecei
ve a
ny t
ype
of t
rain
ing
or t
echn
ical
ass
ista
nce
by a
pro
fess
iona
l ser
vice
pro
vide
r?
yes:
(1)
no:
(0)
if
no,
go
to q
uest
ion
88.
87. I
f yo
u re
ceiv
ed t
rain
ing
or t
echn
ical
ass
ista
nce
in t
he a
bove
indi
cate
d pe
riod,
are
you
cur
rent
ly s
till a
pply
ing
the
tech
nica
l
reco
mm
enda
tions
tha
t th
e pr
ofes
sion
al s
ervi
ce p
rovi
der
gave
you
?
yes:
(1)
no:
(0)
88.
fro
m A
pril
2010
to
Mar
ch 2
011,
did
you
app
ly o
r m
ake
chan
ges
in y
our
prac
tices
or
proc
edur
es in
the
pro
duct
ion
activ
ity y
ou e
ngag
e in
?
yes:
(1)
no:
(0)
89.
from
Apr
il 20
10 t
o M
arch
201
1, t
o im
prov
e th
e m
arke
ting
of y
our
prod
ucts
did
you
use
1 …
1.st
udie
s fo
r th
e de
velo
pmen
t of a
gro-
food
mar
kets
?
2.ag
ro-f
ood
prod
uct p
rom
otio
n ca
mpa
igns
?
3.co
mm
erci
al m
issi
ons,
pro
mot
iona
l fai
rs a
nd/o
r m
arke
t int
egra
tion
foru
ms?
4.a
dire
ctor
y of
agr
o-fo
od p
rodu
ct e
xpor
ters
?
5.co
llect
ive
mar
ks o
f agr
o-fo
od p
rodu
cts?
6.an
y ot
her
stud
y?
1/ m
ark
with
an
x th
e to
ol th
at h
as b
een
used
.
99Program and Project design
VII.
Satis
fact
ion
of t
he b
enef
icia
ry
90.
how
was
the
ser
vice
1 y
ou r
ecei
ved
from
the
off
icer
s re
spon
sibl
e fo
r op
erat
ing
the
prog
ram
2…
1.P
rogr
am to
sup
port
the
purc
hase
of i
nput
sP
oor:(
0)__
__
ave
rage
:(1)_
___
goo
d:(2
)___
_
2.P
rogr
am o
f rur
al d
evel
opm
ent
Poo
r:(0)
____
a
vera
ge:(1
)___
_
g
ood:
(2)_
___
3.h
ydro
-agr
icul
ture
pro
gram
Poo
r:(0)
____
a
vera
ge:(1
)___
_
g
ood:
(2)_
___
4.P
rogr
am to
sup
port
pro
duct
ion
proj
ects
Poo
r:(0)
____
a
vera
ge:(1
)___
_
g
ood:
(2)_
___
5.P
rogr
am to
sup
port
wom
en in
agr
icul
ture
Poo
r:(0)
____
a
vera
ge:(1
)___
_
g
ood:
(2)_
___
1/ f
or e
xam
ple,
trea
tmen
t rec
eive
d at
the
coun
ter,
resp
onse
to q
uest
ions
and
com
plai
nts,
tim
elin
ess
of r
espo
nse
to y
our
requ
est,
and
the
timel
ines
s of
del
iver
y of
the
prog
ram
goo
d or
ser
vice
, am
ong
othe
r as
pect
s.2
/ mar
k w
ith a
n x
the
corr
espo
ndin
g re
spon
se.
91.
Wha
t do
you
con
side
r w
as t
he q
ualit
y1 o
f th
e su
ppor
t yo
u re
ceiv
ed t
hrou
gh t
he p
rogr
am2 …
1.P
rogr
am to
sup
port
the
purc
hase
of i
nput
sP
oor:(
0)__
__
ave
rage
:(1)_
___
goo
d:(2
)___
_
2.P
rogr
am o
f rur
al d
evel
opm
ent
Poo
r:(0)
____
a
vera
ge:(1
)___
_
g
ood:
(2)_
___
3.h
ydro
-agr
icul
ture
pro
gram
Poo
r:(0)
____
a
vera
ge:(1
)___
_
g
ood:
(2)_
___
4.P
rogr
am to
sup
port
pro
duct
ion
proj
ects
Poo
r:(0)
____
a
vera
ge:(1
)___
_
g
ood:
(2)_
___
5.P
rogr
am to
sup
port
wom
en in
agr
icul
ture
Poo
r:(0)
____
a
vera
ge:(1
)___
_
g
ood:
(2)_
___
1/ r
efer
s to
whe
ther
the
supp
ort h
ad th
e ap
prop
riate
tech
nica
l cha
ract
eris
tics
and
if it
was
ade
quat
e fo
r th
e ne
eds
of th
e be
nefic
iary
.2
/ mar
k w
ith a
n x
the
corr
espo
ndin
g re
spon
se.
VIII.
Com
plem
enta
ry q
uest
ions
(top
ics
of s
tate
inte
rest
)
92.
from
Apr
il 20
10 t
o M
arch
201
1, in
the
dev
elop
men
t of
you
r pr
oduc
tion
activ
ity(
ies)
…
how
man
y sa
lari
ed d
ay’s
wor
k di
d yo
u us
e?1
for
how
man
y da
ys o
n av
erag
e di
d yo
u hi
re t
hem
?2h
ow m
uch
on a
vera
ge d
id y
ou p
ay p
er h
ired
day
’s w
ork?
a d
ay’s
wor
k is
equ
ival
ent t
o on
e w
orki
ng d
ay w
hich
nor
mal
ly la
sts
8 ho
urs.
1/ a
sal
arie
d da
y’s
wor
k is
a d
ay’s
wor
k th
at r
ecei
ves
econ
omic
com
pens
atio
n fo
r th
e w
ork
done
.2
/ if a
day
’s w
ork
was
con
trac
ted
for
the
who
le y
ear,
270
days
of w
ork
shou
ld b
e re
cord
ed (
annu
al e
quiv
alen
t day
’s w
ork)
.
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
100
93.
of
the
tota
l lan
d ar
ea t
hat
you
wor
ked
in t
he 2
010
agr
icul
tura
l yea
r in
you
r pr
oduc
tion
unit…
how
muc
h la
nd a
rea
corr
espo
nds
to la
nd
that
is…
uni
t of
mea
sure
men
t1
1.yo
urs?
2.re
nted
?
3.sh
arec
ropp
ed?
4.lo
aned
?
5.ow
ned
in a
ny o
ther
form
?
1
/ rec
ord
the
code
acc
ordi
ng to
the
units
of m
easu
rem
ent t
able
.
94.
As
a re
sult
of y
our
prod
uctio
n ac
tiviti
es c
arrie
d ou
t be
twee
n Apr
il 20
10 a
nd M
arch
201
11 …
wha
t pr
oduc
t(s)
did
you
se
ll?2
Cod
e3ho
w m
uch
did
you
sell?
uni
t of
m
easu
rem
ent4
at w
hat
pric
e di
d yo
u se
ll? (
loca
l cur
renc
y/un
it of
mea
sure
men
t)
on w
hat
date
did
you
mak
e th
e sa
le?
(mon
th a
nd y
ear)
buy
er (
nam
e an
d/or
eco
nom
ic
line
of b
usin
ess)
Pla
ce o
f sa
le
(loca
lity,
m
unic
ipal
ity, s
tate
)S
ale
cond
itio
ns5
1. 2. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.
1/ t
his
ques
tion
does
not
app
ly fo
r no
n-ag
ricul
tura
l rur
al a
ctiv
ities
.2
/ if t
he s
ame
prod
uct w
as s
old
in m
ore
than
one
ope
ratio
n, th
e in
form
atio
n sh
ould
be
item
ized
and
rec
orde
d fo
r ea
ch
oper
atio
n se
para
tely
. if i
t is
a pr
oduc
t sol
d da
ily o
r w
eekl
y, r
ecor
d th
e in
form
atio
n ad
ding
the
data
for
each
of t
he d
iffer
ent
buye
rs o
f the
pro
duct
sol
d du
ring
the
perio
d of
ana
lysi
s. t
his
ques
tion
does
not
app
ly in
thos
e ca
ses
in w
hich
the
sale
s ar
e re
tail
sale
s to
the
final
con
sum
er.
3/ s
ee th
e so
ld p
rodu
cts
tabl
e.4
/ see
the
units
of m
easu
rem
ent t
able
.5
/ spe
cify
if th
e sa
le p
aym
ent w
as in
full,
in in
stal
lmen
ts, i
n ki
nd, b
y co
nsig
nmen
t or
unde
r so
me
othe
r fo
rm.
101Program and Project design
95.
of
the
farm
ass
ets
you
own
in y
our
unit
of p
rodu
ctio
n, p
urch
ased
bet
wee
n Apr
il 20
10 a
nd M
arch
201
11 …
A
SSE
TC
ode2
from
who
m d
id y
ou b
uy it
(na
me
of s
uppl
ier)
?Pla
ce w
here
you
bou
ght
the
asse
t(lo
calit
y, m
unic
ipal
ity, s
tate
)P
urch
ase
cond
itio
ns3
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10.
1
/ exc
lude
s as
sets
bui
lt by
ow
ner
(infr
astr
uctu
re a
nd fa
cilit
ies)
.2
/ see
ass
ets
tabl
e.3
/ spe
cify
if th
e pa
ymen
t for
the
purc
hase
was
in c
ash,
on
cred
it, o
r un
der
som
e ot
her
form
.
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
102
103Program and Project design
annexes4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
IV
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
104
annex 1
sampling framework for the baseline study of the 2008sagaRPa Programs
StateStratified Population
non-stratified population
non-listed Population Total Population
REu % REu % REu % REu %
Aguascalientes 21,266 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 21,266 100.0
baja California 8,175 36.2 5,129 22.7 9,280 41.1 22,584 100.0
baja California Sur 8,099 87.2 0 0.0 1,190 12.8 9,289 100.0
Campeche 25,580 47.3 9,621 17.8 18,933 35.0 54,134 100.0
Chiapas 225,132 45.0 0 0.0 275,595 55.0 500,727 100.0
Chihuahua 87,560 68.4 9,784 7.6 30,608 23.9 127,952 100.0
Coahuila 54,878 90.2 1,263 2.1 4,691 7.7 60,832 100.0
Colima 16,177 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 16,177 100.0
Durango 128,668 72.8 1,179 0.7 46,891 26.5 176,738 100.0
guanajuato 149,510 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 149,510 100.0
guerrero 474,599 92.2 39,982 7.8 0 0.0 514,581 100.0
hidalgo 115,808 53.2 2,657 1.2 99,218 45.6 217,683 100.0
jalisco 104,094 58.7 39,409 22.2 33,804 19.1 177,307 100.0
México 198,967 63.6 113,650 36.4 0 0.0 312,617 100.0
Michoacán 154,649 50.6 139,763 45.8 10,977 3.6 305,389 100.0
Morelos 75,576 96.6 0 0.0 2,628 3.4 78,204 100.0
nayarit 27,323 31.5 4,500 5.2 54,812 63.3 86,635 100.0
nuevo león 37319 88.8 0 0.0 4691 11.2 42010 100.0
oaxaca 496,835 75.1 164,498 24.9 0 0.0 661,333 100.0
Puebla 287,051 93.0 0 0.0 21,505 7.0 308,556 100.0
Querétaro 42,333 82.9 7,206 14.1 1,530 3.0 51,069 100.0
Quintana Roo 27,302 51.8 0 0.0 25,440 48.2 52,742 100.0
San luis Potosí 124,081 65.4 0 0.0 65,565 34.6 189,646 100.0
Sinaloa 198,041 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 198,041 100.0
Sonora 43,853 49.1 0 0.0 45,471 50.9 89,324 100.0
Tabasco 70,525 64.4 38,972 35.6 0 0.0 109,497 100.0
Tamaulipas 57,333 57.2 42,936 42.8 0 0.0 100,269 100.0
Tlaxcala 73,649 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 73,649 100.0
Veracruz 425,647 97.5 11,021 2.5 0 0.0 436,668 100.0
yucatán 74,478 48.0 17,763 11.4 62,899 40.5 155,140 100.0
Zacatecas 85,131 68.2 0 0.0 39,730 31.8 124,861 100.0
Total 3,919,639 72.3 649,333 12.0 855,458 15.8 5,424,430 100.0
Source: Prepared by author with data provided by states.
105Program and Project design
annex 2
sample size by stratum by state
StatesStrata
TotalE11 E12 E13 E21 E22 E23 E31 E32 E33
Aguascalientes 14 6 0 133 15 0 647 175 0 990
baja California 19 2 1 58 5 1 118 11 1 216
baja California Sur 13 22 19 46 62 117 53 81 40 453
Campeche 381 23 3 36 10 1 41 3 0 498
Chiapas 469 84 40 30 10 7 5 2 1 647
Chihuahua 140 28 20 17 11 9 148 124 110 606
Coahuila 0 0 0 49 3 3 410 39 50 554
Colima 18 3 0 60 19 3 92 60 8 264
Durango 118 4 6 174 10 8 369 28 24 741
guanajuato 79 59 68 47 54 71 42 35 60 514
guerrero 704 26 28 96 17 17 35 16 16 955
hidalgo 126 139 65 30 53 42 40 96 100 691
jalisco 68 12 7 80 13 10 248 58 31 527
México 452 13 5 212 8 4 258 13 5 970
Michoacán 110 52 91 60 54 62 51 67 70 617
Morelos 250 44 31 218 43 36 317 73 61 1,074
nayarit 142 3 0 84 3 0 222 25 7 486
nuevo león 13 111 428 2 16 78 10 71 265 993
oaxaca 1,057 111 36 131 30 11 51 11 4 1,442
Puebla 387 30 20 94 30 15 54 20 15 665
Querétaro 101 23 50 33 12 23 49 22 39 351
Quintana Roo 32 24 21 25 31 42 2 5 5 186
San luis Potosí 197 37 19 47 22 33 45 47 114 563
Sinaloa 78 60 41 53 49 46 131 244 289 990
Sonora 2 3 34 1 5 67 9 27 443 591
Tabasco 11 180 369 5 70 74 6 102 103 919
Tamaulipas 14 21 9 15 15 12 121 140 83 430
Tlaxcala 318 37 14 75 7 3 67 6 1 527
Veracruz 136 232 480 46 115 218 22 68 112 1,428
yucatán 253 17 23 62 4 7 9 0 1 375
Zacatecas 60 19 1 13 162 1 145 83 3 487
Total 5,761 1,423 1,928 2,032 957 1,023 3,815 1,752 2,063 20,753
Source: Prepared by author with data provided by states.
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
106
annex 3
sample size by state for non-stratified listed population
State reU State reU
Aguascalientes 0 nayarit 80
baja California 134 nuevo león 0
baja California Sur 0 oaxaca 448
Campeche 187 Puebla 0
Chiapas 0 Querétaro 60
Chihuahua 68 Quintana Roo 0
Coahuila 13 San luis Potosí 0
Colima 0 Sinaloa 0
Durango 7 Sonora 0
guanajuato 0 Tabasco 508
guerrero 80 Tamaulipas 322
hidalgo 16 Tlaxcala 0
jalisco 200 Veracruz 37
México 553 yucatán 89
Michoacán 558 Zacatecas 0
Morelos 0 Total 3,360
Source: Prepared by author with data provided by states.
107Program and Project design
annex 4
sample size by state for non-listed population
State reU State reU
Aguascalientes 0 nayarit 97
baja California 43 nuevo león 125
baja California Sur 47 oaxaca 284
Campeche 50 Puebla 100
Chiapas 129 Querétaro 13
Chihuahua 61 Quintana Roo 37
Coahuila 0 San luis Potosí 84
Colima 0 Sinaloa 0
Durango 148 Sonora 118
guanajuato 0 Tabasco 0
guerrero 0 Tamaulipas 0
hidalgo 138 Tlaxcala 0
jalisco 105 Veracruz 0
México 0 yucatán 75
Michoacán 123 Zacatecas 227
Morelos 208 Total 2,214
Source: Prepared by author with data provided by states.
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
108
109Program and Project design
Results based public mamagement tooLs for the design and imPLementation of PUbLic rUraL deveLoPment Programs with a Project cycLe aPProach
110
Top Related