Regulation of the Small Group Regulation of the Small Group and Individual Health Insurance and Individual Health Insurance
Markets: Why, Why Not, and Markets: Why, Why Not, and What Could Be Better?What Could Be Better?
Len M. Nichols, Ph.D.Director, Health Policy ProgramNew America Foundation
Nichols # 2
OverviewOverview
Relative sizes of insurance markets History of insurance market regulation State and Federal roles Unique importance of Health Insurance Portability
and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Offer rates by firm size Some worrisome trends The search for solutions
Nichols # 3
Relative Sizes of Group and Non-Relative Sizes of Group and Non-Group Insurance MarketsGroup Insurance Markets
MillionsPercent
Offered employer coverage 18075%
Enrolled in employer coverage 16268%
Candidates for nongroup 3414%
Enrolled in nongroup 8.64%
Source: CTS Household Survey, 2001, cited in Nichols and Pauly, Health Affairs, 2002.
Nichols # 4
History of Federal Insurance History of Federal Insurance Market RegulationMarket Regulation
Constitution U.S. vs. Southeast Underwriters, 1944 McCarran-Ferguson, 1945 HMO Act, 1973 Employee Retirement Income Security Act
(ERISA), 1974 Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA),
1990 (Medigap) HIPAA, 1996
Background: Nichols and Blumberg, Health Affairs, 1998.
Nichols # 5
State and Federal Roles in State and Federal Roles in Insurance RegulationInsurance Regulation
States Solvency Consumer protection/market conduct Benefit mandates Market reforms (unless contradict HIPAA)
Federal Market opportunities and rules Exemptions from State law Enforcement of HIPAA if State is unwilling
Nichols # 6
Health Insurance Market ReformsHealth Insurance Market Reforms
Theory of market regulation Insurance is about pooling risk
• Expenditure distribution is highly skewed (1/30, 10/70) Voluntary purchase selection is key issue Competing views of “just” risk pools
• Libertarian• Communitarian
Regulation is about forcing more pooling than the free market would offer up if left alone
Your job as legislators is about deciding how much forced risk pooling there will be
Nichols # 7
Why State Reforms PassedWhy State Reforms Passed
Small business owners were outraged Premium inflation Instability of insurance offers
Non-group insurance stories are harsh, sad, and true Adverse selection is a real threat Selection management is profitable Insurers do what they are allowed to do
Insurance industry historically preferred State regulation to Federal
Nichols # 8
Specific Types of Market Specific Types of Market RegulationsRegulations
Limits on pre-existing condition exclusions
Portability (credit for prior coverage)
Guaranteed renewal
Guaranteed issue
Restrictions on the variance of premiums allowed for the same policy
Nichols # 9
Prevalence of Specific Regulations Prevalence of Specific Regulations (pre-HIPAA)(pre-HIPAA)
Reform Small group Non-group
Guar. Issue 36 9
Guar. Renewal 45 10
Limits on pre-ex 42 13
Premium restrictions 45 11Source: Blue Cross Blue Shield Association
Nichols # 10
Why HIPAA MattersWhy HIPAA Matters
Defined “Federal purpose” to be insurance market performance
Represents bipartisan agreement that small group and non-group markets need rules
Left existing State laws and enforcement mechanisms in place
Established a “Federal floor”
Nichols # 11
HIPAA Group Market ProvisionsHIPAA Group Market Provisions
Limits on pre-existing condition exclusions 12/6 Credit for prior coverage Maximum 62-day gap
Guaranteed issue (all products) Guaranteed renewal No premium variance restrictions
Nichols # 12
HIPAA Individual Market HIPAA Individual Market ProvisionsProvisions
Guaranteed renewal of all products
Guaranteed issue for eligible individuals
Eligible individual 18 months continuous coverage (62 day gap limit) Most recently employer group coverage Exhausted COBRA Not eligible for group or public coverage
No premium variance restrictions
Nichols # 13
Effects of Insurance ReformsEffects of Insurance Reforms
Coverage Not much net effect in small group market Reduced coverage in non-group market
Risk pools Evidence is mixed
Market Competitors (reduced) Competition (increased)
Nichols # 14
Bottom Line: Offer RatesBottom Line: Offer Rates
Employers Employees
Total 57.2% 88.3%< 10 36.8% 47.3%10-24 67.8% 71.5%25-99 82.4% 86.5%100-999 95.4% 96.6%1,000+ 98.8% 99.4%<50 44.5% 63.5%50+ 96.5% 97.8%
Source: MEPS-IC, data 2002.
Nichols # 15
Why Small Firms Don’t OfferWhy Small Firms Don’t Offer
Labor market realities Lower wage workers Higher turnover
Relative costs Administrative economies of scale Risk pooling economies
Nichols # 16
Worrisome Trends IWorrisome Trends I
1996 2002
Offer rates 86.5% 88.3%
Eligibility rates 81.3% 77.1%
Take-up rates 85.5% 81.0%
Source: MEPS-IC, various years
Nichols # 17
Worrisome Trends IIWorrisome Trends II
*ESI Coverage 1987 2002
Overall 66.3% 65.0%
Below poverty 13.9% 16.5%1-2* poverty 48.5% 41.9%2-4* poverty 76.0% 71.4%4+ poverty 85.7% 85.6%
Source: CPS data, cited in Nichols, 2005.
*Employee-sponsored health insurance
Nichols # 18
Worrisome Trends IIIWorrisome Trends III
Ratio of family premium to wages
1998 2003
25th percentile wage 33.2% 47.1%
Median wage 22.4% 32.6%
Mean wage 17.9% 25.7%
Source: National Compensation Surveys, BLS, cited in Nichols, 2005.
Nichols # 19
Worrisome Trends IVWorrisome Trends IVOccupation Family premium/Median wage
Physician 7.3%
History professor 15.8%
Secretary 29.1%
Carpenter 24.2%
Cook 49.8%
Source: BLS, cited in Nichols, 2005.
Nichols # 20
Search for Solutions Intensifies Search for Solutions Intensifies
Association health plans Exemption from State regulations Tradeoff gets back to risk pool preferences
Higher deductible health plans Account based adjuncts (HSAs, HRAs, MSAs) Create better health care consumers But:
• Expenditure distribution is highly skewed• Comparative price and quality data not yet widespread
Nichols # 21
ConclusionsConclusions
Insurance market regulation is largely yours Tradeoffs are the nature of this policy game Increasing fraction of our workforce cannot
afford health insurance as we know it Pressure for solutions will increase We may be ready for systemwide “adult”
conversations
Top Related