Reforming Higher Education:
a National Experience:Hungary
Tirana22-23 March
2006
Conference to LaunchA MASTER PLAN FOR HIGHER EDUCATION
IN ALBANIA
2
The National ContextAchievements Thousands of students - expansion of higher education Excellent talents, prize winners Traditions of education and research New University Centers to serve regional needs (mergers)
Weaknesses Higher education expansion is not accompanied by emphasis on
quality The current course structure is inflexible and does not support
mobility The financing system does not provide sufficient freedom for
competitiveness The infrastructure is inadequate for the changing demand The current payment system does not provide incentives for
excellence Funding for research is far below the EU average
3
Number of students in Hungary 1990-2003
Number of students in Hungary 1990-2005
0
50 000
100 000
150 000
200 000
250 000
300 000
350 000
400 000
450 000
4
Student Numbers 2004/2005Higher Vocational
College University Special Progrs
PhD and Master
Total
Full time 7 452 102 380 109 912 450 5 318 225 512
Evening 84 7 025 2 331 2 168 48 11 656
Correspondence
1 586 98 699 25 926 20 287 2575 149 073
Distance 32 193 3 086 35 279
Total 9 122 240 297 138 169 25 991 7 947 421 520
5
Expected number of school-age population2001-2016
300000
350000
400000
450000
500000
550000
600000
650000
700000
2001 2006 2011 2016
5-9 évesek
10-14 évesek
15-19 évesek
KSH Népességtudományi Kutató Intézet Előreszámítási adatbázis, 2004 (Készítette: Hablicsek László)
6
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Fin
nors
zág
Kor
ea
Kan
ada
Jap
án
Cse
hor
szág
Ais
ztri
a
Ném
etor
szág
OECD
átl
ag
Szl
ovák
ia
Mag
yaro
rszá
g
Egy
esül
t Á
llam
ok
Mex
ikó
Pisa 2003 mathematics
3. szint
1. szint
1. szint alatt
6. szint
5. szint
4. szint
2. szint
11-3
2 1-4
1614-18
2219-23
2422-24
54-7
109-14
1514-18
29
42-7
1513-18
1816-21
OECD (2004), Learning for tomorrow’s world: First results from PISA 2003, Table 2.5a, p.354.
7
Hungarian UNIVERSITAS Programme A long-term strategy for reform and
investment
Objectives Provide high quality teaching and research, competitive
knowledge and skills also by international standards Increase support for students and international mobility Ensure equal access right Introduce performance based funding and payment
schemes for lecturers/researchers Create the conditions for good quality teaching and
research also in the infrastructure Strengthen links between higher education and the
economy
8
Pillars of the Hungarian UNIVERSITAS
Programme (2004)
I. Joining the European Higher Education AreaII. Extending students’ rights and financial
support for mobilityIII. Institutional management and finance reformIV. Infrastructure investment programme
involving private investors (PPP)V. Research and Development Programme with
increased funding
9
Implementing Reforms Policy formulation Coordination and Professional Dialogue Legislative reform: the Bologna objectives, new
steering and funding mechanisms (to provide both for public and private institutions), new governance structures for institutions
A large number of programmes and support schemes
Student Participation National Follow-up StructureNational Bologna Board
Ministry of Education The Hungarian Rectors’ Conference
National Accreditation Subject Specific Steering Groups
Board Higher Education Research Council
National Students UnionEmployers Organizations
10
The two cycle system
Duration and orientation of programmes – which subjects should not be covered by the new system
Employability – the National Qualifications Framework with an outcomes based approach
A unique opportunity to revise pedagogical concepts (focus on the learner)
Access to HE Progression from one cycle to the next
11
LINEÁRIS KÉPZÉSI SZERKEZET
BACHELORS 180-240 credits
MASTER 60-150 credits
12
Implementing the new course structure
Challenges for institutions Structural changes and quality The pace of reforms –changeover from the old system to
the new Dividing teaching content between Bachelor and Master
level Extra administrative burden (e.g. implementing ECTS) The value of a Bachelors degree The binary systemSome conformity is needed but NO Straightjackets!A national debate to consult Students Staff EmployersTracing the career path of graduatesNational coordination groups to develop new curricula at
subject level
13
Teacher Education Reform - an integral part of the overall
education reform Implementing a unified system of initial teacher training 2) In order to enhance quality teaching degrees will be
awarded on the Masters level (it will qualify graduates to teach in the 5 to 12 (or 13) grades of the school system)
Teacher training programmes may be selected as a master option –in the interest of students and the economy
Modernizing the content and methodology of teacher education with a focus on the needs of school education- in the interest of schools
Strengthening the practical orientation of teacher education Organizational frameworks will be provided by the new law On government level In HE institutions
14
National Qualifications Framework
Recommendation: Review the education system as a whole
(public and vocational, lifelong learning) Re-examine vocational and academic
needs and create an integrated system of qualifications that will gradually bring closer education and training.
The implication of an integrated system of qualifications should be considered at the level of curriculum practice.
15
Important Aspects
•Whether the curriculum that was established when at most 10% continued in education, is appropriate when at least 35-40% are expected to continue at least for three years after 18.
•Whether existing participation on the basis of existing curricula, even when it is possible, would provide students with the kind of skills and knowledge that are necessary in the likely circumstances of the twenty first century.
•Learner independence – the empowerment of students
•New methods of student assessment are required
16
Aims of the qualifications framework
• Provide information for end users (employers, parents, institutions, potential students) on the conditions for obtaining an award and the actual content of a qualification;
• Support international comparability of standards with special regard to EU accession and the EHEA;
• Assist student choice by informing students about possible routes of progression also within the context of LLL;
• Give guidance to the higher education institutions in defining their own academic standards and the external evaluation bodies (e.g. Accreditation Board) in defining points of reference for conducting external evaluation.
17
Advantages of having a QF• The framework will allow the institution adequate flexibility in
designing their programmes in the given study fields
• It will promote innovation in the education programmes within a frame agreed by all academic and awarding bodies.
• Needs of further professional education and training will also be considered. The descriptors for the different levels my provide points of reference for placing the qualifications of short cycle programmes at a certain level of the framework
• Quality assurance - learning outcomes increase transparency and the comparability of standards between and within qualifications
• It promotes all types of mobility
• It may assist the employability of new graduates Progression from one cycle to the next
18
Challenges
• The use of credits to quantify learning outcomes - no direct links with learning outcomes,
• Implications for curriculum design, teaching, learning and assessment - a very long and time-consuming process,
• The process assumes close co-operation and consensus between all stakeholders,
• How learning outcomes link into accreditation?
• Also part of a new strategy for lifelong learning
19
Student MobilityMeasures to support and increase mobility: State support for studies at European institutions New system of loans for students – also for foreign studies A comprehensive programme for building new infrastructure ECTS The credit accumulation and transfer system has been
implemented (legal provisions) Moving from contact hours to student workload is still an issue A further challenge is assigning credits to courses in the new
system. The Diploma Supplement: Legal basis – the DS must be issued in Hungarian and in English a student record system on the institutional level new national student data software has been developedIntegrating learning outcomes into the Diploma Supplement
20
Issues for recognition
Direct link between the DS, the correct implementation of ECTS, the modularization of programmes a new style QF Mutual trust and confidence – there is
no identical content
21
Implementing QualityThe Bologna Process as an opportunity to reflect upon the quality of
education, research and services provided by HE guidelines, criteria and processes in the QA mechanisms - external
QA processes the practices of HE institutions (curricula, teaching approach,
staffing, etc.), self-evaluation resources and scope of autonomy - the realization that greater
autonomy brings about better and more coherent QA practices changes in the internal governance of the institutions, granting
autonomy the participation of students (success rates, drop out rates and
career choices) a set of measures to support quality improvement: e.g. part of any
salary increase is linked to performance, normative research funding is tied to performance indicators
changes in the methodology of programme accreditation (and not evaluation) – from input and structure to output
the debate between evaluation v. accreditation and programme v. institutional focus
22
Higher Education Investment Programme
Recognizing that public funding is NOT sufficient for high performing HE
The most significant infrastructure quality development programme in Hungarian higher education - between 2005 and 2008, with the investment amounting to some HUF 175 billion, i.e. to an annual average of HUF 44 billion under a PPP programme.
The purpose of the development projects is to create the conditions for considerably increasing the competitiveness of higher education institutions serving as a basis for creating a knowledge-based society; to ensure that the currently poor infrastructure of higher education institutions, accommodation and benefits for the increasing number of students reach European standards, improving rapidly and significantly.
23
Road to Implementation
New
HE law
24
Who will implement the reforms?
Universities state 18 church 5 foundation 1
Colleges state 13 church 22 Private/foundation 12
Total: 71
25
Extend the autonomy of higher education institutions
Higher education institutions have full decision-making rights within the scope of their deeds of foundation in terms of their operation, the scope of their education and academic research activities and the issuing of internal regulations.
The Economic Council as a new entity that takes the initiative for strategic decisions and controls measures for efficient financial management and operation while the institutions have total freedom in forming their organisations and bodies according to their possibilities with regard to research and development services.
The Economic Council plays a role in financial and development activities. The composition of the body ensures institutional majority, and the Act determines the rights of the Economic Council and the Senate in the interest of autonomy.
26
Financial IndependenceInstitutions have the freedom to differ in their financial management from the provisions of the regulation governing public finances, applicable to budgetary organisations since institutions have the freedom to:
keep their own income in a separate account; pursue business activities without the obligation to pay any taxes
and duties; use proceeds from the sale of properties for development
purposes; sell their own properties; have the right to found businesses, economic enterprises and
foundations; set up risk funds; launch investment projects provided that they commit to
repaying any loans taken out for that purpose; take out loans subject to certain conditions and Sspecial support is granted for launching and maintaining small,
high quality study programmes that are part of the national heritage and to higher education institutions with outstanding education, research and development activities under an agreement
27
SUCCESS FACTORS Bologna and other higher education
reforms (the “trigger effect”) A synergy between top-down and
bottom-up approaches (an impetus to strategic planning)
The role of guidance, support and regulations at national level
The timing and pace of reforms (speed and fine-tuning)
The future of the current university system
28
A culture of transition
Education is one of the key issues of society building and integration
„The transition from rather authoritarian governance towards a democratic and market-oriented society requires many
elements of change within the education system and the process of organized orientation towards the values of this
new type of socity.”
Top Related