R. T. HI C KS CON S U LTA N TS , LTD. 901 Rio Grande Blvd NW Suite F-142 Albuquerque, NM 87104 505.266.5004 Fax: 505.266-0745 Midland, TX Durango, CO Carlsbad, NM Artesia, NM
July 21, 2015 John H. Guenther, LHG Washington State Department of Ecology Bellingham Field Office 1440 10th Street, Suite 102 Bellingham, WA 98225 RE: Voluntary Cleanup Program ERTS # 560499, 1214 8TH AVE, Seattle\ Groundwater Monitoring Report Mr. Guenther: In this report, enclosed are the
• Kane Environmental Memorandums of the two most recent sampling events that include laboratory reports and
• Well logs for the monitoring wells at the site The previously-submitted report contains additional information that may prove useful in the review of this final report. Groundwater Quality Proximal to Former Heating Oil Tank Previously-submitted data demonstrated that that gasoline range petroleum hydrocarbons were not detected in any sampling event. Also below laboratory detection limits were benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene and xylenes. Only diesel range petroleum hydrocarbons and heavy oil range hydrocarbons have been detected above MCTA concentrations and only these compounds are shown in the adjacent table. In 2015, we found that the groundwater elevation at EMW-2 declined to below the aquitard (the bottom of the well). This event was anticipated for both wells and the hydrogeology of the site suggests that EMW-2 would be the first to de-water. As shown on Figure 1 (modified from the previous submission to show the well locations), EMW-2 is downhill and down gradient from the subsurface parking structure – which contains a dewatering system described in previous reports. Thus, EMW-2 lies within the cone of depression caused by the dewatering of the parking structure. EMW-1 shows relatively constant water levels. This well lies in the lowest elevation of the property and may be recharged from street runoff, or other sources.
Samping Date DTW DRO Heavy OilDWS 2/13/2014 --- ND NDDWS 7/3/2014 --- ND NDDWS 10/23/2014 --- ND NDDWS 1/29/2015 --- 157 NDDWS 4/24/2015 --- ND ND
EMW-1 7/10/2013 12.83 911 2340EMW-1 11/7/2013 13.9 968 1,390
EMW-1R 7/3/2014 14.78 341 NDEMW-1R 10/23/2014 10.93 170 359EMW-1R 1/29/2015 13.13 118 373EMW-1R 4/24/2015 13.13 269 NDEMW-2 7/10/2013 8.74 296 1250EMW-2 11/7/2013 9.61 273 325EMW-2 2/13/2014 8.65 170 108EMW-2 7/3/2014 14.41 ND NDEMW-2 10/23/2014 7.74 ND NDEMW-2 1/29/2015 DRYEMW-2 4/24/2025 DRY
MTCA 500 500
July 21, 2015 Page 2 Although EMW-2 is dry, the last four sampling events, spanning the time from November 2013 to October 2014 were below MTCA levels for DRO and Heavy Oil. With the most recent sampling event, results from EMW-1R have been below MTCA limits for four consecutive sampling events. I would like to call you in 7-14 days after you have a chance to review the data. Respectfully Submitted,
Randall T. Hicks Washington Licensed Geologist #2844 Copy: John Schwartz
FigurŜ м: Location of Soldier Piles and Former Heating Oil Tank (red) Upper Aquitard Surface Elevation in Yellow Boxes (amsl)Σ
Elevations of Top of Aquitard Was Not Well Identified on South Shoring Wall
206.0 206.5 Daylight
204.0
208.0
Daylight
209.0
206.5
208.75
MEMORANDUM
To: Mr. Randall T. Hicks
From: Mr. Eric Nassau, Staff Environmental Engineer, Kane Environmental, Inc.
Date: February 13, 2015 Re: Groundwater Sampling 8th and Seneca Site Seattle, Washington
Kane Environmental, Inc. (Kane Environmental) is pleased to present this memorandum regarding the
groundwater and sump water sampling conducted on January 29, 2015, at the Schwartz Company
construction site at the northeastern corner of the intersection at 8th Ave. and Seneca St. (the Property) in
Seattle, Washington. Figure 1 shows the vicinity of the Property and Figure 2 displays the site plan.
BACKGROUND
Kane Environmental was contracted to conduct groundwater monitoring at two groundwater monitoring
wells (EMW-1R and EMW-2), and the de-watering sump (DWS) on the Property for gasoline, diesel,
heavy oil, and Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC). The purpose of this memo is to provide detail of field
methodology used to conduct the groundwater sampling.
WELL MONITORING
On January 29, 2015, Eric Nassau of Kane Environmental went to the Property to conduct groundwater
sampling of wells EMW-1R, EMW-2, and DWS. Well EMW-1R had approximately 4.1 feet of standing
water at a depth of 13.13 feet below top of well casing. Approximately 2 gallons were purged from well
EMW-1R prior to parameter stabilization and groundwater collection. EMW-2 had only 6 inches of
standing water. EMW-2 was pumped dry, and there was insufficient recharge for sample collection. No
purging of the dewatering sump (DWS) was performed nor was a water level taken.
Groundwater Sampling Report 8th and Seneca Site Seattle, Washington Page 2
Field Methodology
Field methods utilized, including sample collection, and selected analysis procedures are briefly
described below.
Groundwater sample from monitoring well EMW-1R was collected by inserting ¼ inch internal diameter
polyethylene tubing until it extended to the bottom of the well. The tubing was retracted slightly to
minimize removal of sediments that may have collected at the bottom. The tubing was attached to a
peristaltic pump, and water was purged from the well. Purge water was monitored for pH, temperature,
and conductivity. Samples were collected for analysis after the above parameters stabilized, in order to
insure the collection of a representative sample of the surrounding groundwater formation.
Water from the dewatering sump was collected by lowering a new one gallon jug (which previously held
distilled water) by a rope into the sump. The jug was retrieved and the water was transferred to sample
containers.
The samples were immediately placed into an ice-filled cooler and transported to Fremont Analytical, Inc.
(Fremont) in Seattle, Washington under standard chain-of-custody procedures.
Analytical Methodology
Groundwater and sump water samples were analyzed for gasoline by NWTPH-Gx; for diesel and heavy
oil by NWTPH-Dx/Dx Extended; and for Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, and Xylenes (BTEX) by EPA
Method 8260.
All analyses were performed in accordance with Fremont’s in-house Quality Assurance/Quality Control
Plans. Sample analyses were performed in compliance with EPA analytical methods and Ecology
guidelines. Samples were analyzed within specified holding times. All detection limits were within
method requirements and no factors appeared to adversely affect data quality.
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
Table 1 displays the current results of monitoring well and sump sampling, as well as results from
previous sampling events. The full analytical report is included as Attachment A.
Groundwater analyzed from EMW-1R (Sample identification, EMW-1R:012915) reported non-detectable
concentrations of BTEX and TPH as gasoline. Diesel Range Organics, in the C12-C24 range, was
reported at a concentration of 118 parts per billion (ppb) and TPH as heavy oil was reported at 373 ppb,
both below their respective MTCA Method A Groundwater Cleanup Levels.
Groundwater Sampling Report 8th and Seneca Site Seattle, Washington Page 3
DWS (Sample identification, DWS:012915) reported non-detectable concentrations of BTEX, and TPH as
gasoline and heavy oil. Diesel Range Organics, in the C12-C24 range, was reported at a concentration
of 157 ppb.
FIGURES Figure 1 – Vicinity Map Figure 2 – Site Plan TABLES Table 1 – Summary of BTEX and Petroleum Products in Groundwater and Sump Water ATTACHMENTS Attachment A – Laboratory Analytical Report
Groundwater Sampling Report 8th and Seneca Site Seattle, Washington Page 4
LIMITATIONS
Kane Environmental has performed this work in accordance with generally accepted professional
practices for the nature and conditions of the work completed in the same locality and at the same time as
the work was performed, and with the terms and conditions as set forth in our proposal.
In preparing this report, Kane Environmental relied on oral statements made by certain individuals. Kane
Environmental has not conducted an independent examination of the facts contained in referenced
materials and/or statements. Kane Environmental shall not be responsible for conditions or
consequences arising from relevant facts that were concealed, withheld, or not fully disclosed at the time
the report was prepared. Facts and conditions referenced in this report may change over time and the
conclusions and recommendations set forth herein are applicable only to the facts and conditions as
described at the time the work was performed. Conclusions were made within the operative constraints
of the scope of work, budget, and schedule for this project.
Our assessment of the Property may change as new data become available, either from persons familiar
with the site or during additional site studies, exploration, or sampling. This report is intended for the
exclusive use of Mr. Randall T. Hicks, and his designated assignees for specific application to the
referenced subject property. It is not meant to represent a legal opinion. No other warranty, express or
implied, is made.
FIGURES
TABLES
TABLE 1Summary of BTEX and Petroleum Products in Groundwater and Sump Water8th and Seneca SiteSeattle, Washington
Sam
ple
ID
Sam
ple
Dat
e
Dep
th to
Wat
er (
ft)
Ben
zene
Tol
uene
Eth
ylbe
nzen
e
Tot
al X
ylen
es
Gas
olin
e
Die
sel
Hea
vy O
il
µg/l µg/l µg/l µg/l µg/l µg/l µg/l
EMW-1 11/7/2013 13.90 ND ND ND ND ND 968 1,390EMW-2 11/7/2013 9.61 ND ND ND ND ND 273 325EMW-2 2/13/2014 8.65 ND ND ND ND ND 170 108DWS 2/13/2014 --- ND ND ND ND ND ND NDEMW-1R 7/3/2014 14.78 ND ND ND ND ND 341 NDEMW-2 7/3/2014 14.41 ND ND ND ND ND ND NDDWS 7/3/2014 --- ND ND ND ND ND ND NDEMW-1R 10/23/2014 10.93 ND ND ND ND ND 170b 359EMW-2 10/23/2014 7.74 ND ND ND ND NDDWS 10/23/2014 --- ND ND ND ND ND ND NDEMW-1R 1/29/2015 13.13 ND ND ND ND ND 118b 373DWS 1/29/2015 --- ND ND ND ND ND 157b ND
MTCA Method A Cleanup Level
5 1000 700 1000 800 a / 1000
500 500
Notes:µg/l = micrograms per liter [equivalent to parts per billion (ppb)].a = user lower cleanup level if benzene is detected.ND = No value detected at method reporting limit.Shaded and Bold concentrations are above MTCA Method A Groundwater Cleanup Level.b = reported as Deisel Range Organics (C12 - C24).c = reported as Heavy Fuel Oil, indicating "the presence of unresolved compounds in the Diesel and Lube+ Oil ranges".
196c
ATTACHMENT A LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
February 05, 2015
Kane Environmental, Inc.Eric Nassau
Attention Eric Nassau:
RE: 8th & Seneca - 27403Lab ID: 1501249
3815 Woodland Park Ave N, Ste. 102Seattle, WA 98103
3600 Fremont Ave. N.Seattle, WA 98103
T: (206) 352-3790F: (206) 352-7178
Fremont Analytical, Inc. received 2 sample(s) on 1/29/2015 for the analyses presented in the following report.
Chelsea Ward
This report consists of the following:
- Case Narrative - Analytical Results - Applicable Quality Control Summary Reports - Chain of Custody
All analyses were performed consistent with the Quality Assurance program of Fremont Analytical, Inc. Please contact the laboratory if you should have any questions about the results.
Thank you for using Fremont Analytical.
Sincerely,
Project Manager
Diesel and Heavy Oil by NWTPH-Dx/Dx Ext.Gasoline by NWTPH-GxVolatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260
www.fremontanalytical.com
1 of 11
02/05/2015Date:
Project: 8th & Seneca - 27403CLIENT: Kane Environmental, Inc.
Lab Order: 1501249
Work Order Sample Summary
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date/Time ReceivedDate/Time Collected
1501249-001 EMW-1R-012915 01/29/2015 11:00 AM 01/29/2015 3:31 PM1501249-002 DWS-012915 01/29/2015 11:30 AM 01/29/2015 3:31 PM
Note: If no "Time Collected" is supplied, a default of 12:00AM is assigned
2 of 11
Project: 8th & Seneca - 27403CLIENT: Kane Environmental, Inc.
2/5/2015
Case Narrative1501249
Date:
WO#:
I. SAMPLE RECEIPT:Samples receipt information is recorded on the attached Sample Receipt Checklist.
II. GENERAL REPORTING COMMENTS:Results are reported on a wet weight basis unless dry-weight correction is denoted in the units field on the analytical report ("mg/kg-dry" or "ug/kg-dry").
Matrix Spike (MS) and MS Duplicate (MSD) samples are tested from an analytical batch of "like" matrix to check for possible matrix effect. The MS and MSD will provide site specific matrix data only for those samples which are spiked by the laboratory. The sample chosen for spike purposes may or may not have been a sample submitted in this sample delivery group. The validity of the analytical procedures for which data is reported in this analytical report is determined by the Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) and the Method Blank (MB). The LCS and the MB are processed with the samples and the MS/MSD to ensure method criteria are achieved throughout the entire analytical process.
III. ANALYSES AND EXCEPTIONS:Exceptions associated with this report will be footnoted in the analytical results page(s) or the quality control summary page(s) and/or noted below.
Prep Comments for METHOD (PREP-DX-W), SAMPLE (1501249-001B) required Silica Gel Cleanup Procedure (Using Method No 3630C).Prep Comments for METHOD (PREP-DX-W), SAMPLE (1501249-002B) required Silica Gel Cleanup Procedure (Using Method No 3630C).
3 of 11
Project: 8th & Seneca - 27403
Client Sample ID: EMW-1R-012915
Collection Date: 1/29/2015 11:00:00 AM
Matrix: Water
Client: Kane Environmental, Inc.
Lab ID: 1501249-001
Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedDFRL
Analytical Report
2/5/20151501249
Date Reported:
WO#:
Diesel and Heavy Oil by NWTPH-Dx/Dx Ext. Analyst: ECBatch ID: 9950
Diesel (Fuel Oil) 2/3/2015 1:53:00 PM51.5 µg/L 1NDDiesel Range Organics (C12-C24) 2/3/2015 1:53:00 PM51.5 µg/L 1118Heavy Oil 2/3/2015 1:53:00 PM103 µg/L 1373 Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 2/3/2015 1:53:00 PM50-150 %REC 159.4 Surr: o-Terphenyl 2/3/2015 1:53:00 PM50-150 %REC 168.0NOTES:DRO - Indicates the presence of unresolved compounds eluting from dodecane through tetracosane (C12-C24).
Gasoline by NWTPH-Gx Analyst: BCBatch ID: R20431
Gasoline 2/1/2015 1:30:00 AM50.0 µg/L 1ND Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 2/1/2015 1:30:00 AM65-135 %REC 198.7 Surr: Toluene-d8 2/1/2015 1:30:00 AM65-135 %REC 197.4
Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260 Analyst: BCBatch ID: R20428
Benzene 2/1/2015 1:30:00 AM1.00 µg/L 1NDToluene 2/1/2015 1:30:00 AM1.00 µg/L 1NDEthylbenzene 2/1/2015 1:30:00 AM1.00 µg/L 1NDm,p-Xylene 2/1/2015 1:30:00 AM1.00 µg/L 1NDo-Xylene 2/1/2015 1:30:00 AM1.00 µg/L 1ND Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 2/1/2015 1:30:00 AM77.4-147 %REC 1105 Surr: Toluene-d8 2/1/2015 1:30:00 AM40.1-139 %REC 1102 Surr: 1-Bromo-4-fluorobenzene 2/1/2015 1:30:00 AM64.2-128 %REC 1100
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank D Dilution was requiredE Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceededJ Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not detected at the Reporting Limit
RL Reporting Limit S Spike recovery outside accepted recovery limits
4 of 11
Project: 8th & Seneca - 27403
Client Sample ID: DWS-012915
Collection Date: 1/29/2015 11:30:00 AM
Matrix: Water
Client: Kane Environmental, Inc.
Lab ID: 1501249-002
Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedDFRL
Analytical Report
2/5/20151501249
Date Reported:
WO#:
Diesel and Heavy Oil by NWTPH-Dx/Dx Ext. Analyst: ECBatch ID: 9950
Diesel (Fuel Oil) 2/3/2015 2:24:00 PM50.1 µg/L 1NDDiesel Range Organics (C12-C24) 2/3/2015 2:24:00 PM50.1 µg/L 1157Heavy Oil 2/3/2015 2:24:00 PM100 µg/L 1ND Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 2/3/2015 2:24:00 PM50-150 %REC 155.7 Surr: o-Terphenyl 2/3/2015 2:24:00 PM50-150 %REC 162.5NOTES:DRO - Indicates the presence of unresolved compounds eluting from dodecane through tetracosane (C12-C24).
Gasoline by NWTPH-Gx Analyst: BCBatch ID: R20431
Gasoline 2/1/2015 1:58:00 AM50.0 µg/L 1ND Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 2/1/2015 1:58:00 AM65-135 %REC 199.7 Surr: Toluene-d8 2/1/2015 1:58:00 AM65-135 %REC 193.1
Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260 Analyst: BCBatch ID: R20428
Benzene 2/1/2015 1:58:00 AM1.00 µg/L 1NDToluene 2/1/2015 1:58:00 AM1.00 µg/L 1NDEthylbenzene 2/1/2015 1:58:00 AM1.00 µg/L 1NDm,p-Xylene 2/1/2015 1:58:00 AM1.00 µg/L 1NDo-Xylene 2/1/2015 1:58:00 AM1.00 µg/L 1ND Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 2/1/2015 1:58:00 AM77.4-147 %REC 1102 Surr: Toluene-d8 2/1/2015 1:58:00 AM40.1-139 %REC 194.1 Surr: 1-Bromo-4-fluorobenzene 2/1/2015 1:58:00 AM64.2-128 %REC 1101
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank D Dilution was requiredE Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceededJ Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not detected at the Reporting Limit
RL Reporting Limit S Spike recovery outside accepted recovery limits
5 of 11
Project: 8th & Seneca - 27403CLIENT: Kane Environmental, Inc.Work Order: 1501249 QC SUMMARY REPORT
Diesel and Heavy Oil by NWTPH-Dx/Dx Ext.
2/5/2015Date:
Sample ID: LCS-9950
Batch ID: 9950 Analysis Date: 2/3/2015
Prep Date: 2/2/2015
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual
Units: µg/L
RL
Client ID: LCSW
RunNo: 20453
SeqNo: 389679
LCSSampType:
Diesel (Fuel Oil) 998.8 88.1 65 13549.9 0880 Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 79.90 55.2 50 15044.1 Surr: o-Terphenyl 79.90 54.6 50 15043.6
Sample ID: MB-9950
Batch ID: 9950 Analysis Date: 2/3/2015
Prep Date: 2/2/2015
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual
Units: µg/L
RL
Client ID: MBLKW
RunNo: 20453
SeqNo: 389680
MBLKSampType:
Diesel (Fuel Oil) 50.0NDHeavy Oil 100ND Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 79.96 54.9 50 15043.9 Surr: o-Terphenyl 79.96 62.0 50 15049.6
Sample ID: 1501249-002BDUP
Batch ID: 9950 Analysis Date: 2/3/2015
Prep Date: 2/2/2015
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual
Units: µg/L
RL
Client ID: DWS-012915
RunNo: 20453
SeqNo: 389881
DUPSampType:
Diesel (Fuel Oil) 3054.7 0NDDiesel Range Organics (C12-C24) 0 0 0 3054.7 0 157.0 5.64166Heavy Oil 30109 0ND Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 87.50 68.4 50 150 059.9 Surr: o-Terphenyl 87.50 78.4 50 150 068.6
NOTES:DRO - Indicates the presence of unresolved compounds eluting from dodecane through tetracosane (C12-C24).
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank D Dilution was required E Value above quantitation range
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not detected at the Reporting Limit
R RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL Reporting Limit S Spike recovery outside accepted recovery limits
6 of 11
Project: 8th & Seneca - 27403CLIENT: Kane Environmental, Inc.Work Order: 1501249 QC SUMMARY REPORT
Gasoline by NWTPH-Gx
2/5/2015Date:
Sample ID: 1501248-001ADUP
Batch ID: R20431 Analysis Date: 1/31/2015
Prep Date: 1/31/2015
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual
Units: µg/L
RL
Client ID: BATCH
RunNo: 20431
SeqNo: 388838
DUPSampType:
Gasoline 3050.0 0ND Surr: Toluene-d8 25.00 101 65 135 0025.2 Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 25.00 98.8 65 135 0024.7
Sample ID: LCS-R20431
Batch ID: R20431 Analysis Date: 1/31/2015
Prep Date: 1/31/2015
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual
Units: µg/L
RL
Client ID: LCSW
RunNo: 20431
SeqNo: 388843
LCSSampType:
Gasoline 500.0 80.9 65 13550.0 0404 Surr: Toluene-d8 25.00 96.6 65 13524.2 Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 25.00 100 65 13525.1
Sample ID: MB-R20431
Batch ID: R20431 Analysis Date: 1/31/2015
Prep Date: 1/31/2015
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual
Units: µg/L
RL
Client ID: MBLKW
RunNo: 20431
SeqNo: 388844
MBLKSampType:
Gasoline 50.0ND Surr: Toluene-d8 25.00 97.1 65 13524.3 Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 25.00 99.1 65 13524.8
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank D Dilution was required E Value above quantitation range
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not detected at the Reporting Limit
R RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL Reporting Limit S Spike recovery outside accepted recovery limits
7 of 11
Project: 8th & Seneca - 27403CLIENT: Kane Environmental, Inc.Work Order: 1501249 QC SUMMARY REPORT
Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260
2/5/2015Date:
Sample ID: 1501234-001AMS
Batch ID: R20428 Analysis Date: 1/31/2015
Prep Date: 1/31/2015
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual
Units: µg/L
RL
Client ID: BATCH
RunNo: 20428
SeqNo: 388777
MSSampType:
Benzene 20.00 95.8 65.4 1381.00 019.2Toluene 20.00 88.4 64 1391.00 017.7Ethylbenzene 20.00 94.0 64.5 1361.00 018.8m,p-Xylene 40.00 94.5 63.3 1351.00 037.8o-Xylene 20.00 92.1 65.4 1341.00 018.4 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 25.00 109 77.4 14727.2 Surr: Toluene-d8 25.00 98.7 40.1 13924.7 Surr: 1-Bromo-4-fluorobenzene 25.00 105 64.2 12826.3
Sample ID: 1501248-001ADUP
Batch ID: R20428 Analysis Date: 1/31/2015
Prep Date: 1/31/2015
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual
Units: µg/L
RL
Client ID: BATCH
RunNo: 20428
SeqNo: 388780
DUPSampType:
Benzene 301.00 0NDToluene 301.00 0NDEthylbenzene 301.00 0NDm,p-Xylene 301.00 0NDo-Xylene 301.00 0ND Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 25.00 103 77.4 147 025.7 Surr: Toluene-d8 25.00 105 40.1 139 026.2 Surr: 1-Bromo-4-fluorobenzene 25.00 100 64.2 128 025.1
Sample ID: MB-R20428
Batch ID: R20428 Analysis Date: 1/31/2015
Prep Date: 1/31/2015
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual
Units: µg/L
RL
Client ID: MBLKW
RunNo: 20428
SeqNo: 388785
MBLKSampType:
Benzene 1.00NDToluene 1.00ND
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank D Dilution was required E Value above quantitation range
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not detected at the Reporting Limit
R RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL Reporting Limit S Spike recovery outside accepted recovery limits
8 of 11
Project: 8th & Seneca - 27403CLIENT: Kane Environmental, Inc.Work Order: 1501249 QC SUMMARY REPORT
Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260
2/5/2015Date:
Sample ID: MB-R20428
Batch ID: R20428 Analysis Date: 1/31/2015
Prep Date: 1/31/2015
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual
Units: µg/L
RL
Client ID: MBLKW
RunNo: 20428
SeqNo: 388785
MBLKSampType:
Ethylbenzene 1.00NDm,p-Xylene 1.00NDo-Xylene 1.00ND Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 25.00 100 77.4 14725.1 Surr: Toluene-d8 25.00 101 40.1 13925.2 Surr: 1-Bromo-4-fluorobenzene 25.00 101 64.2 12825.1
Sample ID: LCS-R20428
Batch ID: R20428 Analysis Date: 1/31/2015
Prep Date: 1/31/2015
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual
Units: µg/L
RL
Client ID: LCSW
RunNo: 20428
SeqNo: 388786
LCSSampType:
Benzene 20.00 97.7 69.3 1321.00 019.5Toluene 20.00 93.6 61.3 1451.00 018.7Ethylbenzene 20.00 95.2 72 1301.00 019.0m,p-Xylene 40.00 95.8 73 1311.00 038.3o-Xylene 20.00 94.4 72.1 1311.00 018.9 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 25.00 110 77.4 14727.4 Surr: Toluene-d8 25.00 101 40.1 13925.2 Surr: 1-Bromo-4-fluorobenzene 25.00 105 64.2 12826.1
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank D Dilution was required E Value above quantitation range
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not detected at the Reporting Limit
R RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL Reporting Limit S Spike recovery outside accepted recovery limits
9 of 11
Date Received: 1/29/2015 3:31:00 PM
Client Name: KANE Work Order Number: 1501249
Sample Log-In Check List
Kerra ZieglerLogged by:
Item Information
How was the sample delivered? Client
Is Chain of Custody complete? Yes No Not Present
Was an attempt made to cool the samples? Yes No NA
Are samples properly preserved? Yes No
Was preservative added to bottles? Yes No NA
Did all samples containers arrive in good condition(unbroken)? Yes No
Does paperwork match bottle labels? Yes No
Are matrices correctly identified on Chain of Custody? Yes No
Is it clear what analyses were requested? Yes No
Is the headspace in the VOA vials? Yes No NA
1.2.
6.
10.11.
12.13.14.
15.16.17. Were all holding times able to be met? Yes No
Chain of Custody
Log In
7. Were all coolers received at a temperature of >0°C to 10.0°C Yes No NA
8. Sample(s) in proper container(s)? Yes No
9. Sufficient sample volume for indicated test(s)? Yes No
Special Handling (if applicable)
18.
19.
Was client notified of all discrepancies with this order? Yes No NA
Person Notified: Date:
Regarding:
Via: eMail Phone Fax In Person
Sample ID on COC is EMW-1R-012915, the sample label reads KMW-1R-012915
Additional remarks:
Client Instructions:
By Whom:
Coolers are present? Yes No NA3.
Shipping container/cooler in good condition? Yes No4.Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler? Yes No Not Required5.
Item # Temp ºC ConditionCooler 2.0 GoodSample 3.1 Good
Page 1 of 110 of 11
11 of 11
MEMORANDUM
To: Mr. Randall T. Hicks
From: Mr. Eric Nassau, Staff Environmental Engineer, Kane Environmental, Inc.
Date: May 19, 2015 Re: Groundwater Sampling 8th and Seneca Site Seattle, Washington
Kane Environmental, Inc. (Kane Environmental) is pleased to present this memorandum regarding the
groundwater and sump water sampling conducted on April 24, 2015, at the Schwartz Company
construction site at the northeastern corner of the intersection at 8th Ave. and Seneca St. (the Property) in
Seattle, Washington. Figure 1 shows the vicinity of the Property and Figure 2 displays the site plan. The
Property currently contains a high-rise residential structure shown under construction in Figure 2.
BACKGROUND
Kane Environmental was contracted to conduct groundwater monitoring at two groundwater monitoring
wells (EMW-1R and EMW-2), and the de-watering sump (DWS) on the Property for gasoline, diesel,
heavy oil, and Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC). The purpose of this memo is to provide detail of field
methodology used to conduct the groundwater sampling.
WELL MONITORING
On April 24, 2015, Eric Nassau of Kane Environmental went to the Property to conduct groundwater
sampling of wells EMW-1R, EMW-2, and DWS. Well EMW-1R had approximately 4.3 feet of standing
water at a depth of 13.02 feet below top of well casing. Approximately 3 gallons were purged from well
EMW-1R prior to groundwater collection. EMW-2 had only 2 inches of standing water. No groundwater
was collected from EMW-2. No purging of the dewatering sump (DWS) was performed nor was a water
level taken.
Groundwater Sampling Report 8th and Seneca Site Seattle, Washington Page 2
Field Methodology
Field methods utilized, including sample collection, and selected analysis procedures are briefly
described below.
Groundwater sample from monitoring well EMW-1R was collected by inserting ¼ inch internal diameter
polyethylene tubing until it extended to the bottom of the well. The tubing was retracted slightly to
minimize removal of sediments that may have collected at the bottom. The tubing was attached to a
peristaltic pump, and water was purged from the well. Samples were collected for analysis after purging
more than three (3) well volumes, in order to insure the collection of a representative sample of the
surrounding groundwater formation.
Water from the dewatering sump was collected by lowering a new one gallon jug (which previously held
distilled water) by a rope into the sump. The jug was retrieved and the water was transferred to sample
containers.
The samples were immediately placed into an ice-filled cooler and transported to Fremont Analytical, Inc.
(Fremont) in Seattle, Washington under standard chain-of-custody procedures.
Analytical Methodology
Groundwater and sump water samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) as diesel
and heavy oil by NWTPH-Dx/Dx Extended.
All analyses were performed in accordance with Fremont’s in-house Quality Assurance/Quality Control
Plans. Sample analyses were performed in compliance with EPA analytical methods and Ecology
guidelines. Samples were analyzed within specified holding times. All detection limits were within
method requirements and no factors appeared to adversely affect data quality.
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
Table 1 displays the current results of monitoring well and sump sampling, as well as results from
previous sampling events. The full analytical reports are included as Attachment A.
Groundwater analyzed from EMW-1R (Sample identification, EMW-1R:042415) reported Diesel Range
Organics, in the C12-C24 range, at a concentration of 269 parts per billion (ppb), below the MTCA
Method A Groundwater Cleanup Level of 500 ppb. TPH as heavy oil was not detected.
DWS (Sample identification, DWS:042415) reported non-detectable concentrations of TPH as diesel and
heavy oil.
Groundwater Sampling Report 8th and Seneca Site Seattle, Washington Page 3
FIGURES Figure 1 – Vicinity Map Figure 2 – Site Plan TABLES Table 1 – Summary of BTEX and Petroleum Products in Groundwater and Sump Water ATTACHMENTS Attachment A – Laboratory Analytical Reports
Groundwater Sampling Report 8th and Seneca Site Seattle, Washington Page 4
LIMITATIONS
Kane Environmental has performed this work in accordance with generally accepted professional
practices for the nature and conditions of the work completed in the same locality and at the same time as
the work was performed, and with the terms and conditions as set forth in our proposal.
In preparing this report, Kane Environmental relied on oral statements made by certain individuals. Kane
Environmental has not conducted an independent examination of the facts contained in referenced
materials and/or statements. Kane Environmental shall not be responsible for conditions or
consequences arising from relevant facts that were concealed, withheld, or not fully disclosed at the time
the report was prepared. Facts and conditions referenced in this report may change over time and the
conclusions and recommendations set forth herein are applicable only to the facts and conditions as
described at the time the work was performed. Conclusions were made within the operative constraints
of the scope of work, budget, and schedule for this project.
Our assessment of the Property may change as new data become available, either from persons familiar
with the site or during additional site studies, exploration, or sampling. This report is intended for the
exclusive use of Mr. Randall T. Hicks, and his designated assignees for specific application to the
referenced subject property. It is not meant to represent a legal opinion. No other warranty, express or
implied, is made.
FIGURES
TABLES
TABLE 1Summary of BTEX and Petroleum Products in Groundwater and Sump Water8th and Seneca SiteSeattle, Washington
Sam
ple
ID
Sam
ple
Dat
e
Dep
th to
Wat
er (
ft)
Ben
zene
Tol
uene
Eth
ylbe
nzen
e
Tot
al X
ylen
es
Gas
olin
e
Die
sel
Hea
vy O
il
µg/l µg/l µg/l µg/l µg/l µg/l µg/l
EMW-1 11/7/2013 13.90 ND ND ND ND ND 968 1,390EMW-2 11/7/2013 9.61 ND ND ND ND ND 273 325EMW-2 2/13/2014 8.65 ND ND ND ND ND 170 108DWS 2/13/2014 --- ND ND ND ND ND ND NDEMW-1R 7/3/2014 14.78 ND ND ND ND ND 341 NDEMW-2 7/3/2014 14.41 ND ND ND ND ND ND NDDWS 7/3/2014 --- ND ND ND ND ND ND NDEMW-1R 10/23/2014 10.93 ND ND ND ND ND 170b 359EMW-2 10/23/2014 7.74 ND ND ND ND NDDWS 10/23/2014 --- ND ND ND ND ND ND NDEMW-1R 1/29/2015 13.13 ND ND ND ND ND 118b 373DWS 1/29/2015 --- ND ND ND ND ND 157b NDEMW-1R 4/24/2015 13.13 --- --- --- --- --- 269b NDDWS 4/24/2015 --- --- --- --- --- --- ND ND
MTCA Method A Cleanup Level
5 1000 700 1000 800 a / 1000
500 500
Notes:µg/l = micrograms per liter [equivalent to parts per billion (ppb)].a = user lower cleanup level if benzene is detected.ND = No value detected at method reporting limit.Shaded and Bold concentrations are above MTCA Method A Groundwater Cleanup Level.b = reported as Deisel Range Organics (C12 - C24).c = reported as Heavy Fuel Oil, indicating "the presence of unresolved compounds in the Diesel and Lube+ Oil ranges".
196c
ATTACHMENT A LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORTS
May 01, 2015
Kane Environmental, Inc.Eric Nassau
Attention Eric Nassau:
RE: 8th & Seneca - 27403-2Lab ID: 1504215
3815 Woodland Park Ave N, Ste. 102Seattle, WA 98103
3600 Fremont Ave. N.Seattle, WA 98103
T: (206) 352-3790F: (206) 352-7178
Fremont Analytical, Inc. received 1 sample(s) on 4/24/2015 for the analyses presented in the following report.
Chelsea Ward
This report consists of the following:
- Case Narrative - Analytical Results - Applicable Quality Control Summary Reports - Chain of Custody
All analyses were performed consistent with the Quality Assurance program of Fremont Analytical, Inc. Please contact the laboratory if you should have any questions about the results.
Thank you for using Fremont Analytical.
Sincerely,
Project Manager
Diesel and Heavy Oil by NWTPH-Dx/Dx Ext.
www.fremontanalytical.com
1 of 9
05/01/2015Date:
Project: 8th & Seneca - 27403-2CLIENT: Kane Environmental, Inc.
Lab Order: 1504215
Work Order Sample Summary
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date/Time ReceivedDate/Time Collected
1504215-001 DWS-042415 04/24/2015 2:05 PM 04/24/2015 2:30 PM
Note: If no "Time Collected" is supplied, a default of 12:00AM is assigned
2 of 9
Project: 8th & Seneca - 27403-2CLIENT: Kane Environmental, Inc.
5/1/2015
Case Narrative1504215
Date:
WO#:
I. SAMPLE RECEIPT:Samples receipt information is recorded on the attached Sample Receipt Checklist.
II. GENERAL REPORTING COMMENTS:Results are reported on a wet weight basis unless dry-weight correction is denoted in the units field on the analytical report ("mg/kg-dry" or "ug/kg-dry").
The validity of the analytical procedures for which data is reported in this analytical report is determined by the Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) and the Method Blank (MB). The LCS and the MB are processed with the samples to ensure method criteria are achieved throughout the entire analytical process.
III. ANALYSES AND EXCEPTIONS:Exceptions associated with this report will be footnoted in the analytical results page(s) or the quality control summary page(s) and/or noted below.
Prep Comments for METHOD (PREP-DX-W), SAMPLE (1504215-001A) required Silica Gel Cleanup Procedure (Using Method No 3630C).
3 of 9
5/1/2015
Qualifiers & Acronyms1504215
Date Reported:
WO#:
Qualifiers:
* - Flagged value is not within established control limitsB - Analyte detected in the associated Method BlankD - Dilution was requiredE - Value above quantitation rangeH - Holding times for preparation or analysis exceededI - Analyte with an internal standard that does not meet established acceptance criteria J - Analyte detected below LOQN - Tentatively Identified Compound (TIC)Q - Analyte with an initial or continuing calibration that does not meet established acceptance criteria (<20%RSD, <20% Drift or minimum RRF)S - Spike recovery outside accepted recovery limitsND - Not detected at the Reporting Limit
Acronyms:
%Rec - Percent RecoveryCCB - Continued Calibration BlankCCV - Continued Calibration VerificationDF - Dilution FactorHEM - Hexane Extractable MaterialICV - Initial Calibration VerificationLCS/LCSD - Laboratory Control Sample / Laboratory Control Sample DuplicateMB or MBLANK - Method BlankMDL - Method Detection LimitMS/MSD - Matrix Spike / Matrix Spike DuplicatePDS - Post Digestion SpikeRef Val - Reference ValueRL - Reporting Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference SD - Serial DilutionSGT - Silica Gel TreatmentSPK - SpikeSurr - Surrogate
www.fremontanalytical.com
4 of 9
Project: 8th & Seneca - 27403-2
Client Sample ID: DWS-042415
Collection Date: 4/24/2015 2:05:00 PM
Matrix: Water
Client: Kane Environmental, Inc.
Lab ID: 1504215-001
Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedDFRL
Analytical Report
5/1/20151504215
Date Reported:
WO#:
Diesel and Heavy Oil by NWTPH-Dx/Dx Ext. Analyst: AKBatch ID: 10628
Diesel (Fuel Oil) 4/28/2015 9:38:00 PM49.9 µg/L 1NDHeavy Oil 4/28/2015 9:38:00 PM99.9 µg/L 1ND Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 4/28/2015 9:38:00 PM50-150 %REC 192.5 Surr: o-Terphenyl 4/28/2015 9:38:00 PM50-150 %REC 194.8
5 of 9
Project: 8th & Seneca - 27403-2CLIENT: Kane Environmental, Inc.Work Order: 1504215 QC SUMMARY REPORT
Diesel and Heavy Oil by NWTPH-Dx/Dx Ext.
5/1/2015Date:
Sample ID LCS-10628
Batch ID: 10628 Analysis Date: 4/28/2015
Prep Date: 4/27/2015
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual
Units: µg/L
RL
Client ID: LCSW
RunNo: 22045
SeqNo: 418497
LCSSampType:
Diesel (Fuel Oil) 1,001 83.7 65 13550.1 0838 Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 80.09 84.4 50 15067.6 Surr: o-Terphenyl 80.09 79.9 50 15064.0
Sample ID MB-10628
Batch ID: 10628 Analysis Date: 4/28/2015
Prep Date: 4/27/2015
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual
Units: µg/L
RL
Client ID: MBLKW
RunNo: 22045
SeqNo: 418498
MBLKSampType:
Diesel (Fuel Oil) 49.8NDHeavy Oil 99.5ND Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 79.63 61.4 50 15048.9 Surr: o-Terphenyl 79.63 64.2 50 15051.1
Sample ID 1504207-002ADUP
Batch ID: 10628 Analysis Date: 4/28/2015
Prep Date: 4/27/2015
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual
Units: µg/L
RL
Client ID: BATCH
RunNo: 22045
SeqNo: 418827
DUPSampType:
Diesel (Fuel Oil) 3050.0 0NDHeavy Oil 30100 0ND Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 80.02 79.1 50 150 063.3 Surr: o-Terphenyl 80.02 85.5 50 150 068.4
Sample ID 1504218-001ADUP
Batch ID: 10628 Analysis Date: 4/28/2015
Prep Date: 4/27/2015
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual
Units: µg/L
RL
Client ID: BATCH
RunNo: 22045
SeqNo: 418837
DUPSampType:
Diesel (Fuel Oil) 3050.1 0NDHeavy Oil 30 R100 238.6 67.5482 Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 80.09 92.5 50 150 074.0 Surr: o-Terphenyl 80.09 93.9 50 150 075.2
6 of 9
Project: 8th & Seneca - 27403-2CLIENT: Kane Environmental, Inc.Work Order: 1504215 QC SUMMARY REPORT
Diesel and Heavy Oil by NWTPH-Dx/Dx Ext.
5/1/2015Date:
Sample ID 1504218-001ADUP
Batch ID: 10628 Analysis Date: 4/28/2015
Prep Date: 4/27/2015
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual
Units: µg/L
RL
Client ID: BATCH
RunNo: 22045
SeqNo: 418837
DUPSampType:
NOTES:R - High RPD due to suspected sample inhomogeneity. The method is in control as indicated by the Laboratory Control Sample (LCS).
7 of 9
Date Received: 4/24/2015 2:30:00 PM
Client Name: KANE Work Order Number: 1504215
Sample Log-In Check List
Erica SilvaLogged by:
Item Information
How was the sample delivered? Client
Is Chain of Custody complete? Yes No Not Present
Was an attempt made to cool the samples? Yes No NA
Are samples properly preserved? Yes No
Was preservative added to bottles? Yes No NA
Did all samples containers arrive in good condition(unbroken)? Yes No
Does paperwork match bottle labels? Yes No
Are matrices correctly identified on Chain of Custody? Yes No
Is it clear what analyses were requested? Yes No
Is the headspace in the VOA vials? Yes No NA
1.2.
6.
10.11.
12.13.14.
15.16.17. Were all holding times able to be met? Yes No
Chain of Custody
Log In
7. Were all coolers received at a temperature of >0°C to 10.0°C Yes No NA
8. Sample(s) in proper container(s)? Yes No
9. Sufficient sample volume for indicated test(s)? Yes No
Samples received straight from field
Special Handling (if applicable)
18.
19.
Was client notified of all discrepancies with this order? Yes No NA
Person Notified: Date
Regarding:
Via: eMail Phone Fax In Person
Additional remarks:
Client Instructions:
By Whom:
Coolers are present? Yes No NA3.
Shipping container/cooler in good condition? Yes No4.Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler? Yes No Not Required5.
Item # Temp ºC ConditionCooler 13.0Sample 13.2
Page 1 of 18 of 9
9 of 9
May 01, 2015
Kane Environmental, Inc.Eric Nassau
Attention Eric Nassau:
RE: 8th & Seneca - 27403-1Lab ID: 1504216
3815 Woodland Park Ave N, Ste. 102Seattle, WA 98103
3600 Fremont Ave. N.Seattle, WA 98103
T: (206) 352-3790F: (206) 352-7178
Fremont Analytical, Inc. received 1 sample(s) on 4/24/2015 for the analyses presented in the following report.
Chelsea Ward
This report consists of the following:
- Case Narrative - Analytical Results - Applicable Quality Control Summary Reports - Chain of Custody
All analyses were performed consistent with the Quality Assurance program of Fremont Analytical, Inc. Please contact the laboratory if you should have any questions about the results.
Thank you for using Fremont Analytical.
Sincerely,
Project Manager
Diesel and Heavy Oil by NWTPH-Dx/Dx Ext.
www.fremontanalytical.com
1 of 9
05/01/2015Date:
Project: 8th & Seneca - 27403-1CLIENT: Kane Environmental, Inc.
Lab Order: 1504216
Work Order Sample Summary
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Date/Time ReceivedDate/Time Collected
1504216-001 EMW-1R-042415 04/24/2015 1:50 PM 04/24/2015 2:30 PM
Note: If no "Time Collected" is supplied, a default of 12:00AM is assigned
2 of 9
Project: 8th & Seneca - 27403-1CLIENT: Kane Environmental, Inc.
5/1/2015
Case Narrative1504216
Date:
WO#:
I. SAMPLE RECEIPT:Samples receipt information is recorded on the attached Sample Receipt Checklist.
II. GENERAL REPORTING COMMENTS:Results are reported on a wet weight basis unless dry-weight correction is denoted in the units field on the analytical report ("mg/kg-dry" or "ug/kg-dry").
The validity of the analytical procedures for which data is reported in this analytical report is determined by the Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) and the Method Blank (MB). The LCS and the MB are processed with the samples to ensure method criteria are achieved throughout the entire analytical process.
III. ANALYSES AND EXCEPTIONS:Exceptions associated with this report will be footnoted in the analytical results page(s) or the quality control summary page(s) and/or noted below.
Prep Comments for METHOD (PREP-DX-W), SAMPLE (1504216-001A) required Silica Gel Cleanup Procedure (Using Method No 3630C).
3 of 9
5/1/2015
Qualifiers & Acronyms1504216
Date Reported:
WO#:
Qualifiers:
* - Flagged value is not within established control limitsB - Analyte detected in the associated Method BlankD - Dilution was requiredE - Value above quantitation rangeH - Holding times for preparation or analysis exceededI - Analyte with an internal standard that does not meet established acceptance criteria J - Analyte detected below LOQN - Tentatively Identified Compound (TIC)Q - Analyte with an initial or continuing calibration that does not meet established acceptance criteria (<20%RSD, <20% Drift or minimum RRF)S - Spike recovery outside accepted recovery limitsND - Not detected at the Reporting Limit
Acronyms:
%Rec - Percent RecoveryCCB - Continued Calibration BlankCCV - Continued Calibration VerificationDF - Dilution FactorHEM - Hexane Extractable MaterialICV - Initial Calibration VerificationLCS/LCSD - Laboratory Control Sample / Laboratory Control Sample DuplicateMB or MBLANK - Method BlankMDL - Method Detection LimitMS/MSD - Matrix Spike / Matrix Spike DuplicatePDS - Post Digestion SpikeRef Val - Reference ValueRL - Reporting Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference SD - Serial DilutionSGT - Silica Gel TreatmentSPK - SpikeSurr - Surrogate
www.fremontanalytical.com
4 of 9
Project: 8th & Seneca - 27403-1
Client Sample ID: EMW-1R-042415
Collection Date: 4/24/2015 1:50:00 PM
Matrix: Water
Client: Kane Environmental, Inc.
Lab ID: 1504216-001
Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedDFRL
Analytical Report
5/1/20151504216
Date Reported:
WO#:
Diesel and Heavy Oil by NWTPH-Dx/Dx Ext. Analyst: AKBatch ID: 10628
Diesel (Fuel Oil) 4/28/2015 10:09:00 PM50.1 µg/L 1NDDiesel Range Organics (C12-C24) 4/28/2015 10:09:00 PM50.1 µg/L 1269Heavy Oil 4/28/2015 10:09:00 PM100 µg/L 1ND Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 4/28/2015 10:09:00 PM50-150 %REC 193.2 Surr: o-Terphenyl 4/28/2015 10:09:00 PM50-150 %REC 1103NOTES:DRO - Indicates the presence of unresolved compounds eluting from dodecane through tetracosane (C12-C24).
5 of 9
Project: 8th & Seneca - 27403-1CLIENT: Kane Environmental, Inc.Work Order: 1504216 QC SUMMARY REPORT
Diesel and Heavy Oil by NWTPH-Dx/Dx Ext.
5/1/2015Date:
Sample ID LCS-10628
Batch ID: 10628 Analysis Date: 4/28/2015
Prep Date: 4/27/2015
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual
Units: µg/L
RL
Client ID: LCSW
RunNo: 22045
SeqNo: 418497
LCSSampType:
Diesel (Fuel Oil) 1,001 83.7 65 13550.1 0838 Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 80.09 84.4 50 15067.6 Surr: o-Terphenyl 80.09 79.9 50 15064.0
Sample ID MB-10628
Batch ID: 10628 Analysis Date: 4/28/2015
Prep Date: 4/27/2015
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual
Units: µg/L
RL
Client ID: MBLKW
RunNo: 22045
SeqNo: 418498
MBLKSampType:
Diesel (Fuel Oil) 49.8NDHeavy Oil 99.5ND Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 79.63 61.4 50 15048.9 Surr: o-Terphenyl 79.63 64.2 50 15051.1
Sample ID 1504207-002ADUP
Batch ID: 10628 Analysis Date: 4/28/2015
Prep Date: 4/27/2015
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual
Units: µg/L
RL
Client ID: BATCH
RunNo: 22045
SeqNo: 418827
DUPSampType:
Diesel (Fuel Oil) 3050.0 0NDHeavy Oil 30100 0ND Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 80.02 79.1 50 150 063.3 Surr: o-Terphenyl 80.02 85.5 50 150 068.4
Sample ID 1504218-001ADUP
Batch ID: 10628 Analysis Date: 4/28/2015
Prep Date: 4/27/2015
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual
Units: µg/L
RL
Client ID: BATCH
RunNo: 22045
SeqNo: 418837
DUPSampType:
Diesel (Fuel Oil) 3050.1 0NDHeavy Oil 30 R100 238.6 67.5482 Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 80.09 92.5 50 150 074.0 Surr: o-Terphenyl 80.09 93.9 50 150 075.2
6 of 9
Project: 8th & Seneca - 27403-1CLIENT: Kane Environmental, Inc.Work Order: 1504216 QC SUMMARY REPORT
Diesel and Heavy Oil by NWTPH-Dx/Dx Ext.
5/1/2015Date:
Sample ID 1504218-001ADUP
Batch ID: 10628 Analysis Date: 4/28/2015
Prep Date: 4/27/2015
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC RPD Ref Val %RPDLowLimit HighLimit RPDLimit Qual
Units: µg/L
RL
Client ID: BATCH
RunNo: 22045
SeqNo: 418837
DUPSampType:
NOTES:R - High RPD due to suspected sample inhomogeneity. The method is in control as indicated by the Laboratory Control Sample (LCS).
7 of 9
Date Received: 4/24/2015 2:30:00 PM
Client Name: KANE Work Order Number: 1504216
Sample Log-In Check List
Erica SilvaLogged by:
Item Information
How was the sample delivered? Client
Is Chain of Custody complete? Yes No Not Present
Was an attempt made to cool the samples? Yes No NA
Are samples properly preserved? Yes No
Was preservative added to bottles? Yes No NA
Did all samples containers arrive in good condition(unbroken)? Yes No
Does paperwork match bottle labels? Yes No
Are matrices correctly identified on Chain of Custody? Yes No
Is it clear what analyses were requested? Yes No
Is the headspace in the VOA vials? Yes No NA
1.2.
6.
10.11.
12.13.14.
15.16.17. Were all holding times able to be met? Yes No
Chain of Custody
Log In
7. Were all coolers received at a temperature of >0°C to 10.0°C Yes No NA
8. Sample(s) in proper container(s)? Yes No
9. Sufficient sample volume for indicated test(s)? Yes No
Samples received straight from field
Special Handling (if applicable)
18.
19.
Was client notified of all discrepancies with this order? Yes No NA
Person Notified: Date
Regarding:
Via: eMail Phone Fax In Person
Additional remarks:
Client Instructions:
By Whom:
Coolers are present? Yes No NA3.
Shipping container/cooler in good condition? Yes No4.Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler? Yes No Not Required5.
Item # Temp ºC ConditionCooler 13.0Sample 13.2
Page 1 of 18 of 9
9 of 9
Top Related