SoA Stochastic Modelingfor Leading Edge Actuaries 1
Stochastic Modeling forLeading Edge Actuaries
Overview of the Practical Aspects ofStochastic Modeling
Ron Harasym MBA, CFA, FSA, FCIAVice-President & Chief Risk Officer
SoA Stochastic Modelingfor Leading Edge Actuaries 2
Outline of Presentation
Stochastic Modeling Defined.
What Stochastic Modeling is and isn’t.
Advantages and Limitations of Stochastic Modeling.
When Stochastic Modeling is Preferred.
Key steps in Stochastic Modeling
Conditional Tail Expectation & Examples
Recommended Practices
Final Thoughts
SoA Stochastic Modelingfor Leading Edge Actuaries 3
Stochastic Modeling - Definition
Stochastic [Greek stokhastikos: from stokhasts, diviner, fromstokhazesthai, to guess at, from stokhos, aim, goal.]
A stochastic model by definition has at least one randomvariable and deals explicitly with time-variable interaction.
A stochastic simulation uses a statistical sampling of multiplereplicates, repeated simulations, of the same model.
Such simulations are also sometimes referred to as MonteCarlo simulations because of their use of random variables.
SoA Stochastic Modelingfor Leading Edge Actuaries 4
Stochastic Modeling - What it is
A stochastic model is an imitation of a real world system. Animprecise technique that provides statistical estimates and notexact results.
Stochastic modeling serves as a tool in a company’s riskmeasurement toolkit to provide assistance in: Valuation, Forecasting, Solvency Testing Financial Reporting Product Design & Pricing Risk Management
Simulations are used when the systems being modeled are toocomplex to be described by a set of mathematical equations forwhich a closed form analytic solution is readily attainable.
Part art, part science, part judgement, part common sense.
SoA Stochastic Modelingfor Leading Edge Actuaries 5
Stochastic Modeling - And What it isn’t
Not a magical solution! One needs to:
Perform reality checks Understand strengths & limitations of the model
Results are not always intuitively obvious!
Often requires a different way of looking at problems, issues,results, and potential solutions.
Greater exposure to model risk and operational risks.
SoA Stochastic Modelingfor Leading Edge Actuaries 6
Advantages of Stochastic Modeling
Systems with long time frames can be studied in compressed time.
Able to assist in decision making and to quantify future outcomesarising from different actions/strategies before implementation.
Can attempt to better understand properties of real world systemssuch as policyholder behavior.
Quantification of the benefit from risk diversification.
Coherent articulation of risk profiles.
Potential reserve and regulatory capital relief.
SoA Stochastic Modelingfor Leading Edge Actuaries 7
Limitations of Stochastic Modeling
Requires a considerable investment of time and expertise. Technically challenging, computationally demanding. Reliance on a few “good” people!
For any given set of inputs, each scenario gives only a estimate. May create a false sense of confidence - a false sense of
precision let alone a false sense of accuracy. Relies heavily on data inputs and the identification of variable
interactions. It is not possible to include all future events in a model. Results may be difficult to interpret. Effective communication of results may be even more difficult. Garbage in, Garbage out!
SoA Stochastic Modelingfor Leading Edge Actuaries 8
Stochastic modeling is Preferred overDeterministic Modeling When:
Product or Line of Business has a “cliff” or “tail” risk profile.
Risks are dependent and/or there is path dependence.
When dealing with skewed and/or discontinuous distributions/costfunctions.
Outcomes are sensitive to initial conditions.
There is significant volatility in the underlying variables.
Volatility or skewness of underlying variables is likely to changeover time.
There are real economic incentives, such as reserve or capitalrelief, to perform stochastic modeling.
SoA Stochastic Modelingfor Leading Edge Actuaries 9
Is There Really a Starting and Ending Point?… No!
Output
HistoricalEconomic Data
HistoricalPolicyholder
DataRandom Number
Generator
EconomicScenario
Generator (ESG)
Stochastic ESGParameters &Assumptions
PolicyholderInput Data
EconomicScenarios
Data Validation&
ESG CalibrationRandomNumbers
StochasticAsset / Liability
Models
Liability DataValidation
Deterministic &Stochastic Liability
Assumptions
Deterministic &Stochastic Asset
Assumptions
Result Tabulation,Validation, & Review
ReportedFinancial Results,Risk Management
Measures
SoA Stochastic Modelingfor Leading Edge Actuaries 10
Where does one Start? Key Steps Are ...
Identify the key issues, objectives and potential roadblocksbefore considering ways of solving the problem.
Articulate the process / model in general terms beforeproceeding to the specific.
Develop the model: assumptions, input parameters, data,output.
Fit the model: gather and analyze data, estimate inputparameters
Implement the model.
Analyze and test sensitivity of the model results & loop back.
Communicate the results.
SoA Stochastic Modelingfor Leading Edge Actuaries 11
Points to Keep in Mind!
Stochastic modeling is an evolutionary / revolutionary concept.
There must be a constant feedback loop.
Learn to “walk” before you “run”.
Recognize that no one model fits all solutions.
Be careful of becoming “married to the method”, rather than theobjective.
Keep it simple, keep it practical, keep it understandable.
Keep performing validation and reality checks throughout allmodeling steps.
Strive towards the production of actionable information!
SoA Stochastic Modelingfor Leading Edge Actuaries 12
Conditional Tail Expectation
Conditional Tail Expectation (CTE) is a conditional expected valuebased on downside risk.
CTE can be defined as the average of outcomes that exceed aspecified percentile.
The CTE(Q%) is calculated as the arithmetic average of the worst(100-Q)% results of the stochastic simulation.
For example: CTE(75%) is the arithmetic average of the worst25% of the results of the stochastic simulation.
CTE is considered to be a more robust measure with greaterinformation content than percentiles.
The CTE measure can also be “modified”.
SoA Stochastic Modelingfor Leading Edge Actuaries 13
Random Number Generator
Objective: To produce random numbers between 0 and 1
Issues: The Random Number Generator (RNG) is a foundation building block Critical, but often ignored/forgotten about! Poor RNG can compromise all post modeling sophistication Numerous RNGs to choose from
Desirable Characteristics to check for: Robustness independent of the seed number Periodicity Fast, efficient, & effective algorithm Other statistical tests (an internet search will provide many)
SoA Stochastic Modelingfor Leading Edge Actuaries 14
Economic Scenario Generator
Objective: To produce capital market or economic scenarios
Components: Drift, Diffusion, Correlation, …
Issues: Is the focus on the mean, median, or tail events? What metric is of concern? Economic vs. Statistical model, Arbitrage-Free vs. Equilibrium What is our calibration benchmark? Numerous ESGs to choose from
Desirable Characteristics to check for: Integrated model (equity, interest rate, inflation, currency) Incorporates the principle of parsimony. Flexible. A component approach.
SoA Stochastic Modelingfor Leading Edge Actuaries 15
Calibration of theEconomic Scenario Generator
Stability of the components over time Drift Stability versus Diffusion Stability versus Correlation Stability
Frequency of recalibration Historical data period versus forecast horizon
Selection of lead index Selection of starting regime if using a multiple regime model
Foreign exchange Issues Data sources and Caveat Emptor Approaches to fitting the data Risk-Return relationship False sense of precision and subjectivity
SoA Stochastic Modelingfor Leading Edge Actuaries 16
Example: Variable Annuity GMIB Rider
Product: Guaranteed Minimum Income Benefit Rider
Objective: Produce Measures for Financial Reporting Calculate Reserve & Capital Requirements
Nature of the Situation: Case #1: MV = $1.00B, GV = $1.40B (in-the-money) Case #2: MV = $2.75B, GV = $2.75B (at-the-money)
Mixture of policyholders 5% Roll-up rate per annum Conservative interest and mortality assumptions at time of product
pricing
SoA Stochastic Modelingfor Leading Edge Actuaries 17
Economic Scenario Generation
Economic Scenario Generator: Equity returns modeled using RSLN2 model Fixed Income returns modeled using Cox-Ingersol-Ross model Correlated Equity & Fixed Income Returns
Calibration Method: Maximum Likelihood Estimation
Calibration Issues: Data is limited and often inconsistent/incorrect. Insufficient effort is often given to data validation. Requires complex methods Historical data period versus forecast horizon Frequency of recalibration
Simulation: 1000 scenarios, monthly frequency,
30 year projection horizon
SoA Stochastic Modelingfor Leading Edge Actuaries 18
Present Value vs. Average Interest Rate per Scenario Scatter PlotStochastic Base Case: Target Equity Return = 8%, Target Interest Rate = 6%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
-$300 -$250 -$200 -$150 -$100 -$50 $0 $50 $100
Ave
rag
e In
tere
st R
ate
ove
r P
roje
ctio
n H
ori
zon
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
Case #1:MV = $1.0B, GV = $1.4B (in-the-money)
SoA Stochastic Modelingfor Leading Edge Actuaries 19
Present Value vs. Average Equity Return per Scenario Scatter PlotStochastic Base Case: Target Equity Return = 8%, Target Interest Rate = 6%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
-$300 -$250 -$200 -$150 -$100 -$50 $0 $50 $100
Ave
rag
e E
qu
ity
Ret
urn
ove
r P
roje
ctio
n H
ori
zon
Case #1:MV = $1.0B, GV = $1.4B (in-the-money)
SoA Stochastic Modelingfor Leading Edge Actuaries 20
CTE Percentile100% -$481.9 -$481.995% -$247.9 -$164.090% -$187.6 -$97.585% -$151.4 -$64.280% -$126.7 -$42.275% -$107.3 -$18.370% -$90.6 $1.765% -$76.4 $15.160% -$64.3 $24.355% -$54.0 $32.850% -$45.0 $38.045% -$37.2 $44.640% -$30.1 $50.135% -$23.8 $54.030% -$18.1 $56.925% -$13.0 $60.120% -$8.3 $65.215% -$3.8 $70.810% $0.5 $76.25% $4.8 $88.30% $9.7 $137.6
CTE & Percentiles: GMIB Case #2
Stochastic Simulation Results
Present Value of GMIB Rider Cash Flows
Assumptions:
Expected equity return = 8% per annumExpected long term interest yield = 6%Number of Scenarios = 1,000
Expected Value or Average
Median or 50th Percentile
Maximum Value
MaximumValue
MinimumValue
SoA Stochastic Modelingfor Leading Edge Actuaries 21
PV of GMIB Rider Cash Flows: Distribution of Stochastic Results
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
-$500 -$450 -$400 -$350 -$300 -$250 -$200 -$150 -$100 -$50 $0 $50 $100 $150
Prob
abilit
y
CTE(0%)
50th Percentile
Assume Reserve isset at CTE(70%)CTE(95%)
Capital
$0
Reserve
Total Gross CalculatedRequirement
Maximum
CTE & Percentiles: GMIB Case #2
SoA Stochastic Modelingfor Leading Edge Actuaries 22
Sensitivity/Stress Testing
Quantifies the impact of an immediate change in anassumption or variable.
Useful for validation of the model with respect to individualassumptions
Also a check on the modeled variable interactions
Allows one to identify and thereby direct more effort on keyassumptions or variables.
SoA Stochastic Modelingfor Leading Edge Actuaries 23
GMIB CTE Measures: Liability Assumption Sensitivity Testing
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300 B
ase
Cas
e
Rid
er C
har
ge
-10
bp
s
Cu
rren
t P
rici
ng
Sp
read
-10
bp
s
Pre
-An
n M
ort
Dec
r10
%
Po
st-A
nn
Mo
rt D
ecr
10%
Lap
se R
ate
x2
Lap
se R
ate
x0.5
An
nu
itiz
atio
n R
ate
x2
An
nu
itiz
aio
n R
ate
x0.5
CTE(95%)
CTE(90%)
CTE(80%)
CTE(70%)
CTE(60%)
CTE(0%)
BaseCase
Case #1:MV = $1.0B, GV = $1.4B (in-the-money)
SoA Stochastic Modelingfor Leading Edge Actuaries 24
GMIB CTE Measures: Investment Assumption Sensitivity Testing
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300 B
ase
Cas
e
Eq
uit
y R
etu
rn =
10%
Eq
uit
y R
etu
rn =
9%
Eq
uit
y R
etu
rn =
7%
Eq
uit
y R
etu
rn =
6%
LT
Yie
ld =
8%
LT
Yie
ld =
7%
LT
Yie
ld =
5%
LT
Yie
ld =
4%
CTE(95%)
CTE(90%)
CTE(80%)
CTE(70%)
CTE(60%)
CTE(0%)
BaseCase
Case #1:MV = $1.0B, GV = $1.4B (in-the-money)
SoA Stochastic Modelingfor Leading Edge Actuaries 25
Recommended Practices:
Keep focused on the business objectives.
No one model fits all. Best to understand fundamentals.
Cultivate “best practices”.
Keep it simple and practical.
Focus on accuracy first, precision second.
Add complexity on a cost/benefit basis.
Don’t ignore data validation and model validation procedures.
Continually perform reality checks.
Constantly loop back through the process.
SoA Stochastic Modelingfor Leading Edge Actuaries 26
Other Issues to Wrestle With:
Some model set-ups generate more volatility in results thanothers. How do we choose between them?
How do we perform calibration and parameter estimation?
How do we capture the correlations between markets.
How many scenarios do we use?
How do we model policyholder behaviour?
How do we incorporate hedging in the model?
SoA Stochastic Modelingfor Leading Edge Actuaries 27
Finally, Where Are We Going … ???
Will stochastic modeling change the way the insurance industryconducts business?
What will be the impact of the recent acceptance/application ofstochastic modeling within the next 1, 5, 10+ years?
How will stochastic modeling alter/impact pricing, productdevelopment, and valuation / risk management practices &procedures?
Even closer to home, how will stochastic modeling impact theeducational experience and skill requirements of current andfuture actuaries?
SoA Stochastic Modelingfor Leading Edge Actuaries 28
Wrap-Up
Questions & Answers!
Top Related