Martin Murphy
EHS Manager
PPI Adhesive Products Limited
Cork Road
Waterford
PPI Groundwater Monitoring 2018
PPI Adhesive Products Limited Project reference: PR-289971-ACM-EN-RP-001 21 August 2018
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:56
PPI Groundwater Monitoring 2018
Project reference: PR-289971-ACM-EN-RP-001
Prepared for: PPI Adhesive Products Limited
AECOM
Quality Information
Prepared by Checked by Approved by
Brendan McCarthy Environmental Scientist
Edel O'Hannelly Principal Hydrogeologist
Kevin Forde Associate Director
Revision History
Revision Revision date Details Authorized Name Position
Issue 1 17 August 2018 Draft for client comment
Yes Kevin Forde Associate Director
Issue 2 21 August 2018 Final Issue Yes Kevin Forde Associate Director
Distribution List
# Hard Copies PDF Required Association / Company Name
0 1 Martin Murphy, PPI Adhesive Products Limited
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:56
PPI Groundwater Monitoring 2018
Project reference: PR-289971-ACM-EN-RP-001
Prepared for: PPI Adhesive Products Limited
AECOM
Prepared for:
Martin Murphy
EHS Manager
PPI Adhesive Products Limited
Cork Road
Waterford IDA Industrial Estate, Cork Road
Waterford
Prepared by:
Brendan McCarthy
Environmental Scientist
T: 021 4365006
M: 087 1872998
AECOM Ireland Limited
1st Floor Montrose House
Carrigaline Road
Douglas
Cork
T: 021 436 5006
aecom.com
© 2018 AECOM Ireland Limited. All Rights Reserved.
AECOM Ireland Limited (“AECOM”) has prepared this Report for the sole use of PPI Adhesive
Products Limited (“Client”) in accordance with the terms and conditions of appointment (ref no: PR-
289971-ACM-PL-EN-001) dated 20 March 2018. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as
to the professional advice included in this Report or any other services provided by AECOM. This
Report may not be relied upon by any other party without the prior and express written agreement of
AECOM.
Where any conclusions and recommendations contained in this Report are based upon information
provided by others, it has been assumed that all relevant information has been provided by those
parties and that such information is accurate. Any such information obtained by AECOM has not been
independently verified by AECOM, unless otherwise stated in the Report. AECOM accepts no liability
for any inaccurate conclusions, assumptions or actions taken resulting from any inaccurate
information supplied to AECOM from others.
The methodology adopted and the sources of information used by AECOM in providing its services
are outlined in this Report. The work described in this Report was undertaken on 18 June 2018 and is
based on the conditions encountered and the information available during the said period of time. The
scope of this Report and the services are accordingly factually limited by these circumstances.
AECOM disclaim any undertaking or obligation to advise any person of any change in any matter
affecting the Report, which may come or be brought to AECOM’s attention after the date of the
Report.
The comments made on groundwater conditions are based on observations made during site work
and the limited monitoring programme. It should be noted that groundwater levels might vary owing to
seasonal or other effects.
The opinions expressed in this Report concerning any contamination found and the risks arising there
from are based on current good practice simple statistical assessment and comparison with available
soil guideline values, AECOM generic assessment criteria and other guidance values.
It should be noted that the effects of ground and water borne contamination on the environment are
constantly under review, and authoritative guidance values are potentially subject to change. The
conclusions presented herein are based on the guidance values available at the time this Report was
prepared, however, no liability by AECOM can be accepted for the retrospective effects of any
changes or amendments to these values.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:56
PPI Groundwater Monitoring 2018
Project reference: PR-289971-ACM-EN-RP-001
Prepared for: PPI Adhesive Products Limited
AECOM
Table of Contents
1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 General Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Background ......................................................................................................................... 1
1.3 Objectives ........................................................................................................................... 1
1.4 Scope of Work .................................................................................................................... 1
2. Site Setting and History ................................................................................................................ 2
2.1 Site Description................................................................................................................... 2
2.2 Site Geology ....................................................................................................................... 2
2.3 Hydrology ............................................................................................................................ 2
2.4 Hydrogeology ...................................................................................................................... 2
2.5 Groundwater Monitoring Well Network ............................................................................... 3
2.6 Groundwater Monitoring and DQRA................................................................................... 3
3. Field Method and Observations .................................................................................................... 4
3.1 Dip Round ........................................................................................................................... 4
3.2 Groundwater Sampling ....................................................................................................... 5
3.3 Water Quality Measurements ............................................................................................. 5
3.4 Observations ....................................................................................................................... 6
4. Laboratory Analysis ....................................................................................................................... 6
4.1 Analytical Schedule ............................................................................................................ 6
4.2 Assessment Criteria ........................................................................................................... 6
4.3 VOCs .................................................................................................................................. 7
4.4 Redox and Biodegradation Indicators ................................................................................ 8
4.5 TPH ..................................................................................................................................... 8
5. Discussion and Updated Conceptual Site Model ......................................................................... 9
5.1 Chlorinated Hydrocarbons .................................................................................................. 9
5.2 Fuel Hydrocarbons ........................................................................................................... 10
6. Conclusions and Recommendations .......................................................................................... 11
6.1 Conclusions ...................................................................................................................... 11
6.2 Recommendations ............................................................................................................ 12
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:56
PPI Groundwater Monitoring 2018
Project reference: PR-289971-ACM-EN-RP-001
Prepared for: PPI Adhesive Products Limited
AECOM
Appendix A Figures
Figure 1 – Site Location Plan
Figure 2 – Neighbouring Businessess in IDA Industrial Estate
Figure 3 – Shallow Well Location Plan
Figure 4 – Bedrock Monitoring Well Locations
Figure 5 – Shallow Groundwater Elevations 2018
Figure 6 – Bedrock Contours September 2018
Figure 7 – Groundwater Elevations PPI On-Site Bedrock Aquifer Monitoring Wells
Figure 8 – Conceptual Site Model
Figure 9 – Bedrock Aquifer Monitoring Wells Across Industrial Estate
Figure 10 – Site Layout Showing Fuel Storage Location
Figure 11 – Detected VOC Composition
Figure 12 – MW20 - Chlorinated Ethene Concentration Trends
Figure 13 – MW16 - Chlorinated Ethene Concentration Trends
Figure 14 – MW17 - Chlorinated Ethene Concentration Trends
Figure 15 – PPI Well - Chlorinated Ethene Concentration Trends
Figure 16 – 404 - Chlorinated Ethene Concentration Trends
Figure 17 – 504 - Chlorinated Ethene Concentration Trends
Figure 18 – 505 - Chlorinated Ethene Concentration Trends
Figure 19 – Concentration vs Distance
Figure 20 – Concentration vs Time Degradation Rate
Appendix B Tables
Table 1 – Sample Inventory 2018
Table 2 – Well Co-Ordinates and Depth Measurements – 18 June 2018
Table 3 – Water Quality Field Parameters – 2018
Table 4 – Bedrock Groundwater Volatile Organic Compound Results (g/L) 2018
Table 5 – Redox and Biodegradation Indicator Results (mg/L) 2018
Table 6 – TPH Results (g/L) 2018
Appendix C Laboratory Certificates
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:56
PPI Groundwater Monitoring 2018
Project reference: PR-289971-ACM-EN-RP-001
Prepared for: PPI Adhesive Products Limited
AECOM 1
1. Introduction
1.1 General Introduction
AECOM Ireland Limited (AECOM) is pleased to present this report to PPI Adhesive Products Limited
(PPI) detailing groundwater monitoring undertaken in June 2018 at the IDA Industrial Estate, Cork
Road Waterford (the site). This report has been prepared in accordance with AECOM proposal
reference PR-289971-ACM-PL-EN-001 dated 20 March 2018; and authorised by PPI under purchase
order number NM 016748.
The AECOM team for 2018 comprised the following:
Project Director: Kevin Forde
Project Manager: Edel O’Hannelly
Project Staff: Brendan McCarthy and Daniel O’Leary
Laboratory analysis of samples was subcontracted to Exova Jones Environmental Ltd., Deeside, UK.
The laboratory certificate is attached in Appendix C.
1.2 Background
The site operates under the terms of an Integrated Pollution and Control (IPC) licence issued by the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (IPC licence P0093-01, issued in May 1997).
The site is required by the EPA to complete groundwater monitoring on an annual basis from selected
groundwater monitoring wells located on site and across the industrial estate. Annual monitoring is
focussed on the presence of chlorinated hydrocarbons in groundwater and parameters indicative of
natural attenuation processes. Up to 1991, trichloroethene (TCE) a chlorinated hydrocarbon and
volatile organic compound (VOC) was used in the production process on site. Since the mid-1990s,
TCE and compounds related to its biodegradation, in addition to other VOCs, have been detected in
groundwater from beneath the site.
Annual monitoring completed in 2014 detected separate-phase fuel hydrocarbons in one monitoring
well. In June 2015, the EPA requested1 that groundwater from wells on-site and off-site down-gradient
wells, be sampled and analysed for fuel hydrocarbons. This was completed in 2015. Sampling of
groundwater from selected on-site wells for fuel hydrocarbons has also been included in subsequent
monitoring rounds, including the 2018 groundwater monitoring ground.
This report presents results for the annual groundwater monitoring undertaken in 2018.
1.3 Objectives
The primary objective was to comply with the site’s annual groundwater monitoring requirements
under P0093-01 and EPA request for information RI003936. Included in this was an assessment of
hydrogeological conditions beneath the site for 2018 and long term concentration trends for
chlorinated hydrocarbons in groundwater.
1.4 Scope of Work
The following tasks were completed to address the site’s groundwater monitoring requirements for
2018:
Task 1 – fieldwork
Task 2 – laboratory analysis
Task 3 – data assessment and reporting
1 EPA request for information RI003936
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:56
PPI Groundwater Monitoring 2018
Project reference: PR-289971-ACM-EN-RP-001
Prepared for: PPI Adhesive Products Limited
AECOM 2
2. Site Setting and History
2.1 Site Description
The site is located in the IDA Industrial Estate, Cork Road, Waterford, see Appendix A Figure 1, and
land use in the immediate vicinity of the site is industrial. The facility produces an extensive variety of
technical self-adhesive tapes for a wide range of applications in many sectors, including the electrical,
electronic, aerospace, photographic and audio/video areas.
The site is situated among other small industrial units, and consists of a number of small offices to the
front (south) of the building with the bulk of the building used for manufacturing. There is also a yard,
divided into the east and west yards, to the rear (north) of the site.
A map illustrating the locations of some of the neighbouring businesses within the IDA Industrial
Estate is presented in Appendix A Figure 2.
2.2 Site Geology
Results of previous drilling works on-site confirm indications from published sources.
Overburden subsoils consist of made ground overlying natural orange/brown, firm to stiff, slightly
gravelly clay. Bedrock geology beneath the site has been mapped as rhyolithic volcanics and grey
and brown shale/slate of the Campile Formation, (Geological Survey of Ireland (GSI), (1995) Bedrock
Geology Map 1:100,000 Sheet 23). Intrusive site investigations have found weathered shale/slate
bedrock to be present from 6.0 m - 6.5 m below ground level (bgl) in the rear yard area, with depth to
weathered bedrock increasing slightly to the south (6.8 m bgl) and more substantially off-site to the
east (13.6 m bgl).
2.3 Hydrology
The nearest surface water features to the site are the Lisduggan Stream and St. John’s River.
The Lisduggan Stream lies about 250 m north-east of PPI and flows from north-west to south-east.
The stream flows into the St. John’s River approximately 400 m east of the site. Groundwater is not
expected to discharge into the Lisduggan Stream, as it is considered to be more of a shallow drainage
channel and bedrock groundwater is considered to be too deep (at >10 m below ground surface) to
be hydraulically connected to it.
The River Suir lies approximately 2.6 km north east of the site and flows eastwards for approximately
12 km before discharging into Waterford Harbour. St. John’s River flows into the River Suir in the
centre of Waterford, approximately 2.7 km north-east of the PPI site.
Neither the Lisduggan Stream, St. John’s River nor the River Suir are used for potable supply down-
gradient of the PPI site.
2.4 Hydrogeology
According to GSI online maps2, the bedrock aquifer in the area is classified as a Regionally Important
Aquifer – fissured bedrock (Rf). Groundwater vulnerability in the industrial estate is assessed as
Moderate to High by the GSI.
Groundwater flow within the bedrock aquifer is complex due to local and regional topography, local
groundwater use, and the likely presence of fault zones and/or volcanic dykes. It is expected that
groundwater flow will be via fractures and fissures and the location of any main, laterally extensive
fractures would be expected to have a major control on flow direction.
According to the GSI website and AECOM’s knowledge of the area, there are groundwater abstraction
wells at four manufacturing facilities close to PPI and a former public water supply well; generally, with
Good to Excellent well yields recorded:
2 www.gsi.ie – accessed 02 July 2018
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:56
PPI Groundwater Monitoring 2018
Project reference: PR-289971-ACM-EN-RP-001
Prepared for: PPI Adhesive Products Limited
AECOM 3
Honeywell International Technologies (550 m to the north-west, two wells currently abstracting
from depths greater than 30 m bgl and yields of 185 m3/d and 75 m
3/d)
Cartamundi (450 m to the west, drilled 1997, depth unknown, Excellent yield 602 m3/d)
TEVA (former Kromberg & Schubert building) (240 m to the northwest, drilled 1968, 67.9 m deep,
Good yield 141.7 m3/d)
Former Waterford Crystal site (770 m to the east-north-east, drilled 1968, 67.9 m deep, Excellent
yield 546 m3/d)
Former Waterford Crystal site (825 m to the east north-east, drilled 1968, 94.2 m deep, Moderate
yield 65.5 m3/d)
Former Waterford Corporation Public Water Supply (PWS) Well No. 3 (300 m to the east, drilled
1968, 61 m deep, Excellent yield 545 m3/d)
The Waterford Corporation PWS is no longer in use and the wells at Waterford Crystal and TEVA are
also believed to be no longer in operation.
It should be noted that in Ireland there is no permitting system to govern well drilling or any
requirement to register wells. Therefore, publically available well records in Ireland are not complete;
wells used for domestic and other purposes are often not recorded by the owners or authorities.
2.5 Groundwater Monitoring Well Network
The site has installed a network of groundwater monitoring wells at locations within and outside of the
site boundary. The first well installed on site was the PPI well, which was drilled in 1997 and installed
as a deep bedrock aquifer monitoring well.
In 20103, 15 shallow monitoring wells (MW1 to MW15) were drilled and installed on site; these wells
are screened within overburden subsoils (see Appendix A Figure 3). Four deeper on site monitoring
wells, screened within fractured bedrock (MW16, MW17, MW19 and MW20), were installed in 20124.
PPI also installed a sixth deep monitoring well (MW18) outside the site boundary to the east-north-
east in 2012.
In addition to these wells, the site routinely monitors groundwater from selected bedrock aquifer
monitoring wells installed around (301, 404 and 501), and down-gradient (504 and 505) of, the Schivo
Group site (former Honeywell Process Solutions site). The Schivo Precision site is located to the north
of PPI, see Appendix A Figure 2.
The network of monitoring wells screened within the bedrock aquifer across the industrial estate is
illustrated in Appendix A Figure 4.
2.6 Groundwater Monitoring and DQRA
Analysis of groundwater from beneath and down-gradient of the site has detected several chlorinated
hydrocarbons; some of the compounds detected are related to historic solvent use on-site (TCE and
related compounds). A detailed quantitative risk assessment (DQRA) of chlorinated hydrocarbons
detected in groundwater was completed in 2013 and submitted to the EPA5.
The DQRA concluded that there was a potential risk to down-gradient abstraction wells from
chlorinated hydrocarbons detected in groundwater from beneath the PPI site (TCE and related
compounds). It was also concluded that TCE is being biodegraded in situ, leading to declining
concentration trends, i.e. TCE is being naturally attenuated in groundwater. However, it was also
concluded that there are other VOCs detected in groundwater, which are not related to historic
practices on site, and which are also compromising the resource value of groundwater in bedrock
beneath the industrial estate. Annual groundwater monitoring was recommended to include monitored
natural attenuation (MNA) parameters indicative of redox state and biodegradation.
3 Source Audit and Soil Vapour Survey 2010, Issue 3 Final, 12 May 2011, reference: 49342246/CKRP0001
4 Further Site Investigation 2012, Issue 2 Final, 24 May 2012, reference: 46403011/CKRP0001
5 PPI Additional Site Investigation and QRA, Issue 2 Final, 24 June 2013, reference: 47092534/CKRP0001
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:56
PPI Groundwater Monitoring 2018
Project reference: PR-289971-ACM-EN-RP-001
Prepared for: PPI Adhesive Products Limited
AECOM 4
During annual groundwater monitoring conducted in 2014, a thin (0.155 m) floating layer of separate-
phase hydrocarbons were detected on groundwater in monitoring well MW20, a deep well in the
western yard screened within bedrock. Dissolved phase fuel hydrocarbons (as total petroleum
hydrocarbon, TPH) were detected in groundwater from adjacent wells.
In June 2015, the EPA requested (EPA request for information RI003936) that PPI undertake a desk
study into the source of TPH. They further requested that groundwater, from all PPI wells and down-
gradient wells, be sampled and analysed for TPH and potential risks posed by TPH contamination
assessed in accordance with the EPA’s Guidance on the Management of Contaminated Land and
Groundwater at EPA Licensed Sites (2013). This was completed in 2015 and monitoring of
groundwater from selected wells for TPH has been included in subsequent monitoring rounds,
including the 2018 monitoring round.
3. Field Method and Observations
Field work was completed on 18 June 2018.
3.1 Dip Round
A dip round of depth to groundwater and total well depth measurements was completed on 18 June
2018 before any wells were purged or sampled. To assist in assessing groundwater flow direction, all
known monitoring wells in this area of the industrial estate, in addition to on- and off-site wells
scheduled for monitoring, were included in the dip round if accessible, see Appendix B Tables 1 and 2.
Depth measurements were taken using an interface probe which is capable of distinguishing between
water and non-aqueous phase liquids (NAPLs). Depending on the density of NAPL relative to water, it
can be detected as either a floating layer (if less dense, e.g. fuel hydrocarbons) or as a sinking layer
(if more dense, e.g. chlorinated solvents).
No floating or sinking NAPL layers were detected during the dip round. However, LNAPL droplets
were noted in wells MW16 and MW20 during purging.
Depth to groundwater measurements were converted to corresponding groundwater elevations
relative to Ordnance Datum (OD). Well and groundwater elevations are presented in Appendix B
Table 2. Groundwater elevations in the shallow monitoring well network are illustrated in Appendix A
Figure 5, with elevations in the deeper bedrock illustrated in Appendix A Figure 6.
Depths to groundwater in the shallow wells ranged between 1.623 m (MW7) and 3.860 m bgl (MW8).
The shallow wells monitor perched groundwater and water level elevations can vary by over 1 m
within a short distance. Groundwater contours for shallow perched groundwater illustrating the
direction of groundwater flow are illustrated in Appendix A Figure 5.
Depth to groundwater measurements in the bedrock aquifer on-site in June 2018 ranged between
9.295 m bgl (MW16) and 12.151 m bgl (PPI Well), these correspond to elevations between 28.233
(PPI Well) and 19.010 m OD (MW16). Depth to groundwater measurements were within previously
reported ranges.
The PPI well consistently records the lowest groundwater elevation in bedrock on the PPI site, see
Appendix Figures 6 and 7. Changes in groundwater elevation in the PPI well follow a similar pattern to
corresponding changes in wells MW16 and MW17; both of which are located close by (5 m to 17 m
from the PPI well). Groundwater elevations indicate that the groundwater level in the PPI well is
consistently between 2 m and 3 m lower than in well MW16 (located 5.2 m to the south-west) and
MW17 (located 16.4 m to the north-east), see Appendix A Figure 8.
Across all the bedrock wells monitored, there appears to be a step-change in groundwater elevation
between the PPI on-site wells and off-site well TBH2 (with groundwater elevations generally between
17.1 m and 22.8 m OD), and the remainder of wells located to the north and east, where groundwater
elevations are much lower than at the PPI site (with groundwater elevations generally between 10.0 m
and 12.5 m OD), see Appendix A Figures 6 and 9.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:56
PPI Groundwater Monitoring 2018
Project reference: PR-289971-ACM-EN-RP-001
Prepared for: PPI Adhesive Products Limited
AECOM 5
Given the varying bedrock groundwater elevations in the wells to the south of this step-change (i.e.
due to the PPI well groundwater elevation issue), defining groundwater contours for the bedrock
aquifer beneath the PPI site itself is problematic.
To the north and east of PPI, consistent groundwater contours can be drawn (Appendix A Figure 6)
and indicate that groundwater flow is to the north, then veering to the north-east. The horizontal
hydraulic gradient is estimated at ~0.018 between wells MW18 and 505.
The detection of TCE and related compounds in groundwater to the north and north-east of the PPI
site can also be used as a tracer for the direction of groundwater flow and supports the hydraulic
evidence.
3.2 Groundwater Sampling
Monitoring wells were sampled using the dedicated sampling equipment (inertial-lift tubing) which had
been previously installed in the deep wells.
Where possible, three times the volume of the standing water in each well was purged prior to
sampling. Well MW20 purged dry after 32 L (>2 x well volume) had been purged; the groundwater
level was allowed to recover and MW20 was sampled on recovery. Well MW20 has purged dry during
previous monitoring rounds.
Field staff wore single-use, disposable nitrile gloves during sampling which were changed between
wells to reduce the risk of cross-contamination. Samples were collected into laboratory supplied
sample containers, field filtered and preserved, where required. Samples were labelled in the field
and details recorded on a chain of custody form which accompanied the samples during transit to the
laboratory by overnight courier. On site and during transit, samples were stored in cool-boxes chilled
with frozen ice-packs and ice.
3.3 Water Quality Measurements
Toward the end of purging, field measurements of unstable water quality parameters were taken using
a calibrated water quality meter and, where possible, a flow-through cell to minimise contact with air.
Due to the presence of NAPL droplets in purge water from MW16 and MW20, no field water quality
measurements were recorded for these wells. Field measurements and observations are presented in
Appendix B Table 3.
pH
Groundwater pH was close to neutral, ranging from 6.3 (501) to 6.7 (504). pH values were generally
close to their long term averages. Typically, the pH range for groundwater in Ireland is 6.0 to 8.0.
Given that the bedrock is shale/slate and, therefore, low in carbonates, pH readings below 7.0 are to
be expected and are consistent with previous monitoring results for the site.
Electrical Conductivity
Electrical conductivity readings in groundwater ranged from 309 μS/cm (501) to 431 μS/cm (504).
Most electrical conductivity readings were within previously reported ranges.
Temperature
Temperature readings were above the normal range for Irish groundwater of 10 ºC to 12 ºC, ranging
between 15.0 oC (504) and 18.4
oC (404). Groundwater temperatures are generally higher than
readings from June 2017. High temperatures could be attributed to the high ambient temperature on
the day of sampling6.
Dissolved Oxygen
Dissolved oxygen readings ranged between 2.36 mg/L (PPI well) and 4.98 mg/L (MW19) in 2018. All
readings were below the concentration of 10-11 mg/L expected for fully aerated water.
6 Maximum temperature 19.7°C recorded at Cork Airport on 18 June 2018 – www.met.ie
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:56
PPI Groundwater Monitoring 2018
Project reference: PR-289971-ACM-EN-RP-001
Prepared for: PPI Adhesive Products Limited
AECOM 6
Dissolved oxygen in groundwater from the PPI well is usually below 2.0 mg/L and below 5.0 mg/L in
groundwater from other wells. In groundwater from wells MW18, MW19 and 501, the long term
average dissolved oxygen concentration is above 5.0 mg/L.
Redox Potential
Redox potential readings were recorded as oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) in the field and
adjusted to give Eh. Adjusted Eh readings ranged from 271 mV (504) to 391 (505) mV. Eh readings
indicate that groundwater varies between slightly reducing and slightly oxidising.
Both dissolved oxygen and redox potential are indicators of the reducing/oxidising state of
groundwater. Under reducing groundwater conditions, TCE can be broken-down in the bedrock
aquifer through a process of reductive dechlorination. As TCE is broken-down, cis-1,2-dichloroethene
(cDCE) is generated. cDCE, in turn, can be broken-down through a second reductive dechlorination
step to create vinyl chloride (VC, also called chloroethene). VC can be broken-down through a third
step to create the gas ethene.
3.4 Observations
No floating or sinking NAPL layers were detected during the dip round. However LNAPL droplets were
noted in groundwater from wells MW16 and MW20 during purging.
A hydrocarbon odour was also noted from groundwater from MW16 and MW20, both bedrock wells
are located close to the fill point for the diesel tank, see Appendix A Figure 10.
Groundwater from most on-site monitoring wells appeared turbid/cloudy and brown in colour.
Groundwater from wells MW19 and the PPI well was clear.
Groundwater from most of the off-site monitoring wells was generally clear; however, groundwater
from well 501 was cloudy and brown in colour.
4. Laboratory Analysis
4.1 Analytical Schedule
A sample inventory is presented in Appendix B Table 1 detailing the monitoring wells sampled in 2018
and analyses scheduled. Groundwater from all of the bedrock aquifer monitoring wells sampled on-
site and off-site were scheduled for analysis of VOCs (including chlorinated hydrocarbons) and
indicators of MNA (redox and biodegradation indicators).
In addition, groundwater from selected wells on-site was analysed for TPH.
4.2 Assessment Criteria
Assessment of groundwater analytical data was completed by comparing results with published
guidelines and with criteria derived as part of the DQRA completed in 2013:
EPA Interim Guideline Values (IGVs)
Groundwater Threshold Values, Statutory Instrument No. 366, 2016 (GTVs)
Generic Assessment Criteria protective of human health receptors in the industrial estate
(commercial GACs)
Controlled Water Site Specific Target Levels (SSTLs)
The IGVs represent negligible groundwater contamination and were developed in 2003 using a
number of existing water quality guidelines in use in Ireland and internationally, including existing
national environmental quality standards, proposed common indicators from the groundwater
directive, drinking water standards and Geological Survey of Ireland trigger values.
GTVs were published in 2010 and updated in 2016. Exceedance of a threshold value triggers further
investigation to confirm whether the criteria for poor groundwater chemical status are being met.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:56
PPI Groundwater Monitoring 2018
Project reference: PR-289971-ACM-EN-RP-001
Prepared for: PPI Adhesive Products Limited
AECOM 7
GACs protective of human health given the site’s industrial setting were derived; the only viable
pathway considered was vapour inhalation.
SSTLs, protective of potential groundwater users located 155 m down-gradient of the site were
derived for the site for TCE and related chlorinated hydrocarbons cDCE and VC, as part of the DQRA
process in 2013. The DQRA model was revisited in 2015 in relation to fuel hydrocarbons and relevant
additional SSTLs were generated.
4.3 VOCs
Groundwater from five on-site and four off-site bedrock aquifer monitoring wells were analysed for
VOCs. In addition to chlorinated ethenes (TCE, cDCE and VC) a number of other VOCs are routinely
detected in groundwater from the bedrock aquifer beneath the industrial estate, specifically:
Chlorinated methanes: trichlorofluoromethane (TCFM) and chloroform
Chlorinated ethanes: 1,1,1-trichloroethane (TCA) and 1,1-dichloroethane (DCA)
There is a marked distinction between the composition of the VOC suite detected in groundwater from
beneath the PPI site and that detected in groundwater from down-gradient of the PPI site.
Chlorinated ethenes dominate the suite detected beneath the PPI site, while chlorinated methanes
dominate off-site, see Appendix A Figure 11.
VOC results for 2018 are presented in Appendix B Table 4, together with available historic results.
No VOCs were detected above laboratory method detection limits (MDLs) in groundwater from well
MW19. No VOCs have been detected in groundwater from up-gradient well MW19 since it was first
sampled in February 2012.
TCE, cDCE and VC were initially detected in groundwater from MW20 at a combined concentration of
up to 207 g/L in February 2012, but have since declined, with only a trace detection of VC reported
for 2018, 0.7 g/L. Concentration trends for MW20 are illustrated in Appendix A Figure 12.
Chlorinated ethene concentrations have also declined in groundwater from MW16. TCE was not
detected above the MDL (3 g/L) since 2014, and concentrations of cDCE and VC were 5 g/L and
3.1 g/L in 2018 respectively. cDCE had been detected at 2,214 g/L in February 2012.
Concentration trends are illustrated in Appendix A Figure 13. Trace concentrations of other organics
were also detected in groundwater from MW16 in June 2018, including naphthalene, o-xylene and
sec-butylbenzene, these are considered likely to be related to the presence of fuel hydrocarbons. The
total VOC concentration in groundwater from well MW16 was 19 g/L, the lowest concentration on
record for this well.
In groundwater from MW17, chlorinated ethene concentrations have been relatively static over the
long-term; concentration trends are illustrated in Appendix A Figure 14. In June 2018, TCE was
detected at 9 g/L while cDCE was detected at 16 g/L, marking reductions from 63 g/L and 93 g/L
respectively in 2017.
The highest VOC concentrations on-site are detected in groundwater from the PPI well; detections
are again dominated by chlorinated ethenes. In 2018, TCE was detected at 79 g/L, cDCE at
802 g/L (10 times the TCE concentrations in this well) and VC at 27 g/L. Over the long term, the
general trend in concentrations is downward, see Appendix A Figure 15, with the concentration of
cDCE consistently higher than that of the parent compound TCE.
The pattern of detections seen in groundwater from off-site monitoring wells 301 and 404 has been
similar, with chlorinated ethenes generally detected at low concentrations or below the MDL, while
TCFM was typically detected at several 1,000 g/L prior to 2016. Since 2015 it has not been possible
to sample groundwater from well 301, as the well is blocked. In groundwater from 404, chlorinated
ethene concentrations were less than 10 g/L in June 2018, while TCFM was detected at 1,209 g/L.
The trends in chlorinated ethene concentrations are illustrated in Appendix A Figure 16.
Chlorinated ethenes tend to be close to, or below, detection in groundwater from off-site well 501, as
was the case in 2018. TCFM tends to be detected at the highest concentration in groundwater from
this well, 104 g/L in 2018, with an historic peak of 631g/L (January 1999).
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:56
PPI Groundwater Monitoring 2018
Project reference: PR-289971-ACM-EN-RP-001
Prepared for: PPI Adhesive Products Limited
AECOM 8
In the farthest off-site wells, 504 and 505, low concentrations of chlorinated ethenes are detected;
generally <20 g/L in groundwater from 504, and <50 g/L in groundwater from 505. Concentration
trends for 504 are illustrated in Appendix A Figure 17 and in Appendix A Figure 18 for well 505. In
2017 the total chlorinated ethene concentration in groundwater from well 504 increased to 54 g/L,
but declined again in 2018 to 23 g/L. In groundwater from 505, the concentration of chlorinated
ethenes has dropped for the third year in a row, from 47 g/L in 2017 to 40 g/L in 2018.
TCFM is also detected in groundwater from both wells. The TCFM concentration in groundwater from
well 505 tended to be above 1,000 g/L between December 2007 and June 2015. The concentration
of TCFM in groundwater from well 505 was 359 g/L in June 2018, the lowest TCFM concentration for
this well since December 2006.
In groundwater from well 504, the concentration of TCFM also increased in 2017, up to 732 g/L,
having been below 100 g/L since 2008. Similarly to chlorinated ethane concentrations in
groundwater from this well, the TCFM concentration also declined again in 2018, down to 49 g/L.
With regard to detections of chlorinated ethenes in groundwater, cDCE is typically detected at higher
concentrations than TCE. In particular, in groundwater from the PPI well, which has the highest
chlorinated ethene concentrations, cDCE is detected at 802 g/L, while TCE is detected at
79 g/L, an order of magnitude difference. The greater prevalence of cDCE indicates that there has
been significant in situ biodegradation of TCE through reductive dechlorination in the aquifer.
None of the VOC concentrations detected in groundwater exceeded GAC protective of human health
(in terms of potential vapour intrusion and inhalation). The concentration of TCE and cDCE in
groundwater from the PPI well exceeded the controlled water SSTL, as did VC in groundwater from
the PPI well and MW16.
4.4 Redox and Biodegradation Indicators
Results for indicators of redox conditions and biodegradation are presented in Appendix B Table 5.
Results are generally not indicative of strongly reducing groundwater conditions, as nitrate is detected
in groundwater from several wells. However, dissolved iron and manganese are also detected in
groundwater from MW16 and MW20 in excess of the IGV (0.2 mg/L for iron, 0.05 mg/L for
manganese), and are indicative of more reducing conditions in groundwater from these wells. It is
considered that the presence of fuel hydrocarbons in groundwater in the vicinity of wells MW16 and
MW20 is leading to the creation of more reducing groundwater conditions there.
There is generally no marked differentiation in chloride and total alkalinity concentrations between the
wells; concentration of chloride and alkalinity would be expected to increase as TCE is biodegraded.
Chloride was generally detected at a concentration between 17 mg/L (MW17) and 28 mg/L (MW20
and 505). The only exception is MW19, where chloride was detected at a concentration of 43 mg/L.
MW19 is located up hydraulic gradient of the site.
Total alkalinity was detected at concentrations between 130 mg/L (501) and 288 (MW16).
The low TCE concentrations detected in most groundwater samples, generally <50 g/L, may be
insufficient to result in changes to the background levels of biodegradation indicators. The higher
concentrations of cDCE in certain wells confirm that TCE is being biodegraded in-situ through
reductive dechlorination.
4.5 TPH
TPH results are presented in Appendix B Table 6. Aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons were below
the MDL in groundwater from well MW19.
In groundwater from well MW17, the only hydrocarbons detected were aliphatics in the carbon chain
length range of C5-C6, this is concluded to correspond to chlorinated hydrocarbons detected in the
VOC suite rather than fuel hydrocarbons.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:56
PPI Groundwater Monitoring 2018
Project reference: PR-289971-ACM-EN-RP-001
Prepared for: PPI Adhesive Products Limited
AECOM 9
In groundwater from wells MW16, MW20 and the PPI Well, fuel related hydrocarbons were detected.
Both MW16 and MW20 are located close to the diesel tank and fill point and the PPI well is located
approximately 5 m down gradient of MW20, see Appendix A Figure 10.
The absence of fuel hydrocarbons in groundwater from MW17 and the relatively low TPH
concentration at the PPI well (8,144 g/L compared to 500,994 g/L at MW16 and 194,557 g/L at
MW20) indicates that this fuel impact is localised to MW16 and MW20.
5. Discussion and Updated Conceptual Site Model
5.1 Chlorinated Hydrocarbons
Source
As detailed previously in the DQRA, the source of TCE detected in groundwater relates to its historic
use as a solvent at the PPI site, i.e. pre-1991. TCE entered ground in the eastern yard, where spent
barrels of TCE were left to drain. Limited TCE was detected in shallow soil and groundwater, with the
highest concentrations detected in groundwater from the deeper bedrock, from deeper than 9.5 m bgl.
Other chlorinated hydrocarbons detected in groundwater from across the industrial estate (TCFM,
TCA, etc.) were reportedly not used at the PPI site and their sources appear to be related to known,
historic activities located outside of the PPI site boundary.
Pathways and Receptors
Workers on site are not directly exposed to TCE and related compounds in groundwater, as they have
no contact with groundwater from beneath the site. The only potential pathway that workers on site, or
on adjacent sites, could potentially be exposed to TCE and related compounds, is through
volatilisation from groundwater upwards through the vadose zone atmosphere and into the above
ground atmosphere (breathing zone). However, concentrations in groundwater are at least two orders
of magnitude lower than GACs protective of human health via this pathway; therefore, workers are not
at significant risk from this pathway.
SSTLs were derived to be protective of potential controlled waters receptors down-gradient of the site.
Groundwater from the bedrock aquifer is known to be used for industrial supply purposes in the
industrial estate, and to have previously been used for potable water supply purposes. While the
former Waterford Corporation public water supply (PWS) well, which was located 310 m from the site,
is no longer used, the DQRA considered the risk to a potential supply well located at 155 m down-
gradient of the site, i.e. half the distance from the site of the former PWS well.
In 2018, TCE exceeded the SSTL in groundwater from the PPI well, cDCE exceeded the SSTL in
groundwater from the PPI well and VC exceeded its in groundwater from the PPI well and well MW16.
Concentrations of TCE, cDCE and VC decline with distance from the PPI well, as illustrated in
Appendix A Figure 19.
Concentration data are available for the PPI well dating back to 1997, and reported concentrations of
TCE and cDCE peaked in 2002. Taking the declining concentrations in the PPI well from 2002 to
2018, the half-lives of TCE and cDCE have been estimated at 4.75 years and 6.3 years, respectively,
see Appendix A Figure 20. These values are consistent with those estimated in the 2013 DQRA and
are comparable with the higher end of typical TCE and cDCE half-life values from published literature
sources.
Taking these half-lives and reported concentrations in the PPI well for 2018, it is estimated that it will
take ~17 years for cDCE concentrations in groundwater from the PPI well to decline to the SSTL,
while it will take TCE less than five years to reach the relevant SSTL (see Appendix A Figure 20).
VC concentrations in groundwater from the PPI well are not following a clear trend (see Appendix A
Figure 15). In addition, VC remains below detection limits in groundwater from all wells down-gradient
of the site. As VC is a reductive breakdown product of cDCE, it will likely be detected in groundwater
from beneath the PPI site for as long as elevated cDCE is also detected.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:56
PPI Groundwater Monitoring 2018
Project reference: PR-289971-ACM-EN-RP-001
Prepared for: PPI Adhesive Products Limited
AECOM 10
The DQRA was conservative in calculating SSTLs that are protective of a compliance point at 155 m
down-gradient of the site, intended to be protective of the former Waterford City Council public supply
well, 310 m from the PPI well. Given that there is no longer an actual supply well at this distance
down-gradient of the site, and there is no known other potable groundwater user in the vicinity, the
SSTL is considered appropriately conservative.
The former PWS well at 310 m has not been used for many years and it is understood from Waterford
City Council that there are no plans to return it to use.
5.2 Fuel Hydrocarbons
Source
The source of fuel hydrocarbons in groundwater is related to the diesel storage tank and fill point
located between the eastern and western yards. The tank has a 2,000 L capacity and is double
skinned, it is reported by site personnel to be only a couple of years old and is situated within a bund.
Fuel in the tank powers the sprinkler pump house located in the north-western corner of the western
yard. The fuel supply is gravity fed from the tank to the pump house. Limited fuel is used for this
purpose, as the system is not in regular use, but is tested on a weekly basis.
PPI have a second site within the industrial estate, which is located some distance to the north. The
second site has its own diesel tank, which is used to refuel PPI vehicles. Sometime prior to the August
2014 groundwater monitoring round, the refuelling system at the other site broke-down and the fuel
tank in the rear yard of the site was used as a temporary backup supply for PPI vehicles.
As staff were unfamiliar with using the backup system, the refuelling point was not properly secured
following use, with a resulting loss of fuel to ground. PPI has not been able to estimate the volume of
fuel lost to ground at that time, but consider it to have been limited.
The fuel tank in the rear yard is no longer used to supply PPI vehicles, as the other refuelling system
was repaired. Improvements have also been made to the fill point, and it is now locked, reducing the
likelihood that a similar loss could occur.
Pathways and Receptors
Fuel lost to ground is interpreted to have migrated vertically downward through cracks in concrete of
the rear yard to the water table. No separate phase fuel hydrocarbons were detected when the
shallow wells were dipped in August 2014 and June 2015, indicating the fuel did not spread out
laterally. A layer of separate phase floating LNAPL was detected in the deeper bedrock well MW20 in
August 2014, June 2016 and again in June 2017; indicating that the fuel migrated vertically downward
through the overburden to the water table in the bedrock.
The increase in NAPL thickness between September 2016 (0 mm) and June 2017 (204 mm) is
inferred to be caused by changes in water level releasing trapped hydrocarbons from the 2014 diesel
spill and not to indicate a new source. The hydrocarbon bailed from the well in June 2017 appeared
old and weathered.
In 2018, no free phase hydrocarbon layers were detected during the dip round however, LNAPL
globules were noted during purging of wells MW16 and MW20.
Similarly to chlorinated hydrocarbons, workers on site are not directly exposed to fuel hydrocarbons in
groundwater, as they have no contact with groundwater from beneath the site. The only potential
pathway that workers on site, or on adjacent sites, could potentially be exposed to fuel hydrocarbons,
is through volatilisation from groundwater upwards through the vadose zone atmosphere and into the
above ground atmosphere. GACs protective of human health via this pathway were not generated, as
it is calculated that the vapour pathway would become saturated at a concentration below that at
which a potential risk could be generated.
The DQRA model from 2013 was revisited in 2015 to devise controlled water SSTLs, again taking the
compliance point as being a water supply well at a distance of 155 m down-gradient of the site. For
the majority of hydrocarbon fractions, no risk to the controlled water receptor could be generated, as
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:56
PPI Groundwater Monitoring 2018
Project reference: PR-289971-ACM-EN-RP-001
Prepared for: PPI Adhesive Products Limited
AECOM 11
most components of diesel are not sufficiently soluble in water to impact upon ground water at a
compliance point 155 m from site, see Appendix B Table 6.
It was possible to calculate SSTLs for individual aromatic and aliphatic carbon chain lengths,
exceedances of these SSTLs were noted at wells MW16, MW20 and PPI Well. However, in
groundwater from well MW17, which is located down-gradient within 22 m of wells MW16 and MW20,
concentrations of all fuel-related hydrocarbons are below detection limits.
There are elevated concentrations of some of the heavier hydrocarbon fractions (>C16 chain length
fractions) in groundwater from MW16 and MW20. However, these fractions have very low solubility
and mobility, and therefore will have only very localised impact beneath the rear yard. This is
confirmed by the absence of these hydrocarbon fractions in groundwater from the down-gradient well
MW17.
6. Conclusions and Recommendations
6.1 Conclusions
A groundwater monitoring round was conducted in June 2018 at the PPI site in the IDA Industrial
Estate, Cork Road, Waterford, with samples collected to assess concentrations of chlorinated
hydrocarbons and fuel hydrocarbons in groundwater from beneath the site and from selected off-site
wells located down-gradient.
Chlorinated hydrocarbons have been detected in groundwater from beneath the PPI site since the
PPI well was installed in 1997. Some of the chlorinated hydrocarbons detected (the chlorinated
ethenes, TCE, cDCE and VC) are related to the historic use of TCE on site up to 1991. Other
hydrocarbons (TCFM, 1,1,1-TCA) detected are related to off-site sources unrelated to PPI.
Groundwater flow across the industrial estate is complex. Varying groundwater elevations over short
distances hamper determination of the groundwater flow direction in bedrock directly beneath the site.
However, beyond the northern site boundary the groundwater flow direction can be determined to be
generally to the north and north-east, with relatively low detections of chlorinated ethenes to the north
and north-east also acting as a tracer for groundwater flow from the PPI site in this direction.
Results for 2018 indicate that chlorinated ethene concentrations in groundwater from beneath the PPI
site and off-site continue to decline.
A DQRA was completed in 2013, and the conceptual site model developed remains valid. There are
no viable human health receptors exposed to chlorinated ethenes in groundwater either on site or off-
site. As a conservative measure, the DQRA considered the controlled waters receptor to be a
hypothetical water supply well located 155 m down-gradient of the site. Current concentrations in
groundwater from the PPI well, MW16 and MW17 are above SSTLs calculated to be protective of this
receptor.
Based on concentration trends in the PPI well, calculated concentration half-lives have been
estimated, indicating that it will take cDCE approximately 17 years to decline to the SSTL protective of
such a water supply well, while it will take TCE less than five years to reach the SSTL.
While VC concentrations in groundwater from the PPI well itself do not appear to be following a
declining trend, VC remains below detection limits in all groundwater wells down-gradient of the site.
The 2013 DQRA was conservative in calculating SSTLs that are protective of a compliance point at
155 m down-gradient of the site, given that there is no supply well at this distance down-gradient of
the site. There is no known other potable groundwater user in the vicinity and the former PWS well at
a distance of 310 m has not been used for many years and it is understood that there are no plans to
return it to use.
In August 2014, separate phase fuel hydrocarbons were detected in deep monitoring well MW20 and
have been detected intermittently in subsequent monitoring rounds.
Elevated dissolved phase fuel hydrocarbon concentrations in 2018 are limited to groundwater from
bedrock wells MW16, MW20 and PPI well. Within 22 m down-gradient of these wells dissolved phase
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:56
PPI Groundwater Monitoring 2018
Project reference: PR-289971-ACM-EN-RP-001
Prepared for: PPI Adhesive Products Limited
AECOM 12
concentrations decline below detection limits in bedrock wells and no fuel hydrocarbon impacts have
been identified in shallow monitoring wells in recent groundwater monitoring rounds.
The DQRA developed in 2013 was revisited in 2015 to derive SSTLs for various fractions of fuel
hydrocarbons. For many fuel hydrocarbon fractions no risk to the controlled water receptor could be
generated, as components of diesel are not sufficiently soluble in water to impact upon groundwater
at a compliance point 155 m from site. Therefore, while fuel hydrocarbon concentrations in
groundwater from MW16 and MW20 are elevated, the low permeability of the bedrock around MW20
and the low solubility and mobility of the fuel hydrocarbon fractions present means that they have only
limited, localised impact beneath the rear yard of the PPI facility.
6.2 Recommendations
It is recommended that groundwater monitoring continue on an annual basis but with the future scope
reduced to focus on the on-site wells only.
Analysis for VOC, chlorinated ethenes, indicators of biodegradation and redox, should be
undertaken on groundwater samples from bedrock aquifer monitoring wells located on the PPI
site (the PPI well and MW16, MW17, MW19 and MW20).
A dip round of all accessible monitoring wells within the industrial estate can be completed but,
given the low concentrations of chlorinated ethenes in groundwater from off-site wells, it is
considered that they no longer need to be included in the monitoring round.
Given the low mobility and solubility of the fuel hydrocarbons detected, it is recommended that
analysis of fuel hydrocarbons continue to be limited to bedrock aquifer monitoring wells located
within the rear yard.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:56
PPI Groundwater Monitoring 2018
Project reference: PR-289971-ACM-EN-RP-001
Prepared for: PPI Adhesive Products Limited
AECOM
Appendix A Figures
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:56
Sources: USGS, FAO, NPS, EPA, ESRI, DeLorme, TANA, and other suppliers
SITELOCATION
Approximate Scale
1km 2km0 km
WATERFORD
1ST FLOOR, MONTROSE HOUSE, CARRIGALINE ROAD,DOUGLAS, CORK
TEL +353 21 436 5006 WWW.AECOM.COM
DRAWING TITLE
FIGURE 1 - SITE LOCATION PLANPPI ADHESIVE PRODUCTS LIMITED
CLIENT
PROJECT
N
Job No. SCALE
TRACED CHECKEDDRAWN APPROVED
BMCDATE
AUG 2018EO’H KF
PR-289971-ACM-FG-EN-001AS SHOWN
GROUNDWATER MONITORING 2018
Notes
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:56
TEVA
Waterford Instituteof Technology
TEVA
PPI
TEVA
Schivo Precision
WaterfordStanley
CartamundiIreland Ltd
WITTraining
WIT
APS
ELCLaser Group
DonohoeDrinks
Company
WaterfordCarpetsBall Corporation
TEVA
KeltechEng
RigneyDolphinGroup
SwedenCareIRELTD
TEVA
Schivo Precision
SunLife
NationalLearning
HoneywellTurbo
Technologies
Bausch & LombIreland
SanofiAventis(To Let)Novartis
(Former Site)
Sources: USGS, FAO, NPS, EPA, ESRI, DeLorme, TANA, and other suppliers
1ST FLOOR, MONTROSE HOUSE, CARRIGALINE ROAD,DOUGLAS, CORK
TEL +353 21 436 5006 WWW.AECOM.COM
DRAWING TITLE
FIGURE 2 - NEIGHBOURING BUSINESSES IN IDA INDUSTRIAL ESTATEPPI ADHESIVE PRODUCTS LIMITED
CLIENT
PROJECT
N
APPROXIMATE SCALE
0 m 100 m
Job No. SCALE
TRACED CHECKEDDRAWN APPROVED
BMCDATE
AUG 2018EO’H KF
AS SHOWN
GROUNDWATER MONITORING 2018PR-289971-ACM-FG-EN-002
Notes
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:56
SHALLOW WELL LOCATION
lerraB erotS
lerraB erotS
hcti
wSmo
oR
lerr
aBer
otS
lerr
aBer
otS
lerr
aBer
otS
lerr
aBer
otS
lerr
aBer
otS
lerr
aBer
otS
knaT retaW
skna
T
MW4
MW8
MW11
MW15
MW12
MW14
MW13
KeyPPI ADHESIVE PRODUCTS LIMITED
GROUNDWATER MONITORING
2018
CLIENT
PROJECT
DRAWING TITLE
FIGURE 3 - SHALLOW BOREHOLE LOCATION PLAN
Job No.SCALE
TRACED CHECKEDDRAWN APPROVED
BMCDATE
AUG 2018EO’H KF
PR-289971-ACM-FG-EN-003AS SHOWN
1ST FLOOR, MONTROSE HOUSE, CARRIGALINE ROAD,DOUGLAS, CORK
TEL +353 21 436 5006 WWW.AECOM.COM
MW9
MW5
MW10
MW7
MW6
MW3
MW2
MW1 N
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:56
DRAWING TITLE
FIGURE 4 - BEDROCK MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS
Job No.SCALE
TRACED CHECKEDDRAWN APPROVED
BMCDATE
AUG 2018EO’H KF
PR-289971-ACM-FG-EN-004AS SHOWN
PPI ADHESIVE PRODUCTS LIMITED
GROUNDWATER MONITORING 2018
CLIENT
PROJECT
Key
ORDNANCE SURVEY OF IRELAND LICENCE NO. EN001918APPROXIMATE SCALE
0 m 100 m
PPI BEDROCK AQUIFERMONITORING WELHONEYWELL BEDROCK AQUIFERMONITORING WEL
NOTES
WCC BEDROCK AQUIFER MONITORING WELL
1ST FLOOR, MOTNROSE HOUSE, CARRIGALINE ROAD,DOUGLAS, CORK
TEL +353 21 436 5006 WWW.AECOM.COM
N
BURIED OR BLOCKEDMONITORING WELL
101
MW18
MW19
MW20
301
404
302
603501
303402
505
PPI WELL
TBH1
TBH2
TBH3
TBH4
TBH5
MW17
504
MW16
For in
spec
tion p
urpo
ses o
nly.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:56
SHALLOW WELL LOCATION
lerraB erotS
lerraB erotS
hcti
wSmo
oR
lerr
aBer
otS
lerr
aBer
otS
lerr
aBer
otS
lerr
aBer
otS
lerr
aBer
otS
lerr
aBer
otS
knaT retaW
skna
T
MW4
MW8
MW11
MW15
MW12
MW14
MW13
KeyPPI ADHESIVE PRODUCTS LIMITED
GROUNDWATER MONITORING
2018
CLIENT
PROJECT
DRAWING TITLE
FIGURE 5 - SHALLOW BOREHOLE CONTOURS 2018
Job No.SCALE
TRACED CHECKEDDRAWN APPROVED
BMCDATE
AUG 2018EO’H KF
PR-289971-ACM-FG-EN-005AS SHOWNDOUGLAS, CORK
TEL +353 21 436 5006 WWW.AECOM.COM
MW9
MW5
MW10
MW7
MW6
MW3
MW2
MW1
1ST FLOOR, MONTROSE HOUSE, CARRIGALINE ROAD,
N
DRY
DRY
DRY
24.54
25.14
26.02
25.56
25.36
26.71
26.29
NM
26.30
27.21
25.65
24.80
25.59
24.92
24.41
25.51
25.02
24.66
25.13
24.35
25.83
NM
25.65
26.73
24.67
25.36
25.65 GROUNDWATER ELEVATION IN METRES ABOVE ORDNANCE DATUM NOT MEASURED NMGROUNDWATER CONTOURS (OD)
INFERRED GROUNDWATER FLOW
INFERRED GROUNDWATER CONTOURS (OD)
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:56
101
301
404
302
603501
303402
505
504
101
MW18MW18
MW19
MW20PPI WELL
MW17
MW16
MW19
PPI WELL PPI WELL MW20
301
404
302
603501
303402
505
504
PPI WELL PPI WELL MW17
TBH1
TBH2
TBH3
TBH4
TBH5
MW16
DRAWING TITLE
FIGURE 6 - BEDROCK CONTOURS18 JUNE 2018
Job No.SCALE
TRACED CHECKEDDRAWN APPROVED
BMCDATE
AUG 2018EO’H KF
PR-289971-ACM-RP-EN-001AS SHOWN
PPI ADHESIVE PRODUCTS LIMITED
GROUNDWATER MONITORING 2018
CLIENT
PROJECT
Key
ORDNANCE SURVEY OF IRELAND LICENCE NO. EN001918APPROXIMATE SCALE
0 m 100 m
PPI BEDROCK AQUIFER MONITORING WELL
HONEYWELL BEDROCK AQUIFERMONITORING WELL
NOTES
WCC BEDROCK AQUIFER MONITORING WELL
IST FLOOR, MONTROSE HOUSE, CARRIGALINE ROAD,DOUGLAS, CORK
TEL +353 21 436 5006 WWW.AECOM.COM
N
10.19 GROUNDWATER ELEVATION (OD)
GROUNDWATER CONTOURS (OD)
NM NOT MEASURED (INACCESSIBLE/BLOCKED)
GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS NOT CONTOURED SOUTH OF THIS LINE
INFERRED GROUNDWATER FLOW
13.25
17.77
18.3118.01
15.84
17.82
11.74NM
10.19
10.19
10.60
10.49
10.7110.86
11.50
10.72
10.83
13.25
17.77
18.3118.01
15.84
17.82
11.74
10.60
11.02
10.7110.86
11.50
10.72
10.83
NMNM
NM
NM
13.62
18.27
18.84
19.0118.36
16.08
21.77
12.04
10.019
10.19
10.66
10.65
11.15
11.02
11.2411.40
NM
11.28
NM
NMNM
12.24
NM
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:56
Prepared by: BMC
Checked by: EOHAppendix A Figure 7
AECOM Ireland Limited \\eu.aecomnet.com\EMIA\UKI\IEORK1\Jobs\PR-289971_PPI_GWM_2018\500_Deliverables\PR-289971-ACM-RP-EN-001\PPI Tables 2018
15
16
17
18
19
20
Jul-2011 Apr-2012 Dec-2012 Aug-2013 Apr-2014 Dec-2014 Sep-2015 May-2016 Jan-2017 Sep-2017 May-2018 Feb-2019
Gro
un
dw
ate
r E
lev
ati
on
(m
OD
) Groundwater Elevations
PPI On-Site Bedrock Aquifer Monitoring Wells
PPI Well
MW16
MW17
MW19
MW20
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:56
404
MW19
501
REAR YARD
MADE GROUND
LEGEND
GRAVELLY CLAY - OVERBURDEN
SHALE/SLATE BEDROCK
GROUNDWATER LEVEL
GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION
1
A
B
GROUNDWATER FLOW
GROUNDWATER
POTENTIAL SOURCES
KNOWN RECEPTOR
POTENTIAL RECEPTOR
PATHWAYS
UPGRADIENT OF PPI - TCFM
2 REAR YARD - CHLOROETHENES
IDENTIFIED SOURCES
LOWER RIVER SUIR ESTUARY
PROJECT
CLIENT
DRAWING TITLE
DRAWN TRACED CHECKED APPROVED
BMC EOH KFSCALE JOB NO.
DATE
NTS
JUN 2018
PR-289971-ACM-FG-EN-008
FIGURE 8 CONCEPTUAL SITE MODELCROSS SECTION SOUTHWEST-NORTHEAST
PPI ADHESIVE PRODUCTS LIMITED
GROUNDWATER MONITORING 2018
SOUTH-WEST NORTH-EAST
INDUSTRIAL UNITPPI ADHESIVES HONEYWELL
12
11
~3.5 km
404
MW16PPI WELL
MW17
?
404
MW19
501
404
MW16
MW19
501
25m
30m
20 m
15m
5m
10m
0 m
-5m
22.5 m
27.5 m
17.5 m
12.5 m
7.5 m
2.5 m
-2.5 m
PPI WELL
MW17
LOWERSUIR
ESTUARY
B
A
11
1ST FLOOR, MONTROSE HOUSE, CARRIGALINE ROAD, DOUGLAS, CORK
TEL +353 21 436 5006 WWW.AECOM.COM
?
??
??
INFERRED GROUND SURFACE
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:56
Prepared by: BMC
Checked by: EOHAppendix A Figure 9
AECOM Ireland Limited \\eu.aecomnet.com\EMIA\UKI\IEORK1\Jobs\PR-289971_PPI_GWM_2018\500_Deliverables\PR-289971-ACM-RP-EN-001\PPI Tables 2018
7.5
10.0
12.5
15.0
17.5
20.0
22.5
25.0
Jan-2012 Jan-2013 Jan-2014 Jan-2015 Jan-2016 Dec-2016 Dec-2017 Dec-2018
Gro
un
dw
ate
r E
lev
ati
on
(m
OD
) Groundwater Elevations
Bedrock Aquifer Monitoring Wells Across Industrial Estate
PPI Well MW16 MW17 MW19 MW20
MW18 TBH2 TBH5 301 404
501 504 505
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:56
SHALLOW WELL LOCATION
lerraB erotS
lerraB erotS
hcti
wSmo
oR
lerr
aBer
otS
lerr
aBer
otS
lerr
aBer
otS
lerr
aBer
otS
lerr
aBer
otS
lerr
aBer
otS
knaT retaW
skna
T
MW4
MW8
MW11
MW15
MW12
MW14
MW13
KeyPPI ADHESIVE PRODUCTS LIMITED
GROUNDWATER MONITORING
2018
CLIENT
PROJECT
DRAWING TITLE
FIGURE 10 - SITE LAYOUT SHOWING FUEL STORAGE LOCATION
Job No.SCALE
TRACED CHECKEDDRAWN APPROVED
BMCDATE
AUG 2018EO’H KF
PR-289971-ACM-FG-EN-010AS SHOWN
1ST FLOOR, MONTROSE HOUSE, CARRIGALINE ROAD,DOUGLAS, CORK
TEL +353 21 436 5006 WWW.AECOM.COM
MW9
MW5
MW10
MW7
MW6
MW3
MW2
MW1
BEDROCK WELL LOCATION
MW16
MW17
PPIWELL
MW20
Diesel Fill Point
MW16
MW17
PPIWELL
MW20
Diesel Tank
Diesel Fill Point
DIESEL STORAGE TANK DIESEL FILL POINT
N
NOTES
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:56
Prepared by: BMC
Checked by: EOHAppendix A Figure 11 Detected VOC Composition
PPI Adhesives Groundwater Monitoring 2018
MW16 June 2018
Chlorinated Ethenes
Chlorinated Ethanes
Chlorinated Methanes
Other VOCs
Total VOC Concentration
19 mg/L MW17 June 2018
Chlorinated Ethenes
Chlorinated Ethanes
Chlorinated Methanes
Other VOCs
Total VOC Concentration
29 mg/L
PPI Well June 2018
Chlorinated Ethenes
Chlorinated Ethanes
Chlorinated Methanes
Other VOCs
Total VOC Concentration
1,745 mg/L
404 June 2018
Chlorinated Ethenes
Chlorinated Ethanes
Chlorinated Methanes
Other VOCs
Total VOC Concentration
1,228 mg/L
501 June 2018
Chlorinated Ethenes
Chlorinated Ethanes
Chlorinated Methanes
Other VOCs
Total VOC Concentration
155 mg/L
504 June 2018
Chlorinated Ethenes
Chlorinated Ethanes
Chlorinated Methanes
Other VOCs
Total VOC Concentration
100 mg/L
505 June 2018
Chlorinated Ethenes
Chlorinated Ethanes
Chlorinated Methanes
Other VOCs
Total VOC Concentration
411 mg/L
AECOM Ireland Limited \\eu.aecomnet.com\EMIA\UKI\IEORK1\Jobs\PR-289971_PPI_GWM_2018\500_Deliverables\PR-289971-ACM-RP-EN-001\PPI Tables 2018
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:56
Updated by: EOH
Checked by: BMC
Appendix A Figure 12
PPI Adhesives Groundwater Monitoring 2018
Page 4 of 12
AECOM Ireland Limited \\eu.aecomnet.com\EMIA\UKI\IEORK1\Jobs\PR-289971_PPI_GWM_2018\500_Deliverables\PR-289971-ACM-RP-EN-001\PPI Tables 2018
0
50
100
150
200
250
Jul-11 Apr-12 Dec-12 Aug-13 Apr-14 Dec-14 Sep-15 May-16 Jan-17 Sep-17 May-18 Feb-19
Co
ncen
trati
on
s (m
g/L
)
MW20 - Chlorinated Ethene Concentration Trends
Vinyl Chloride
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Trichloroethene
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:56
Prepared by: EOH
Checked by: BMC
Appendix A Figure 13
PPI Adhesives Groundwater Monitoring 2018
Page 5 of 12
AECOM Ireland Limited \\eu.aecomnet.com\EMIA\UKI\IEORK1\Jobs\PR-289971_PPI_GWM_2018\500_Deliverables\PR-289971-ACM-RP-EN-001\PPI Tables 2018
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
Jul-11 Apr-12 Dec-12 Aug-13 Apr-14 Dec-14 Sep-15 May-16 Jan-17 Sep-17 May-18 Feb-19
Co
ncen
trati
on
s (m
g/L
)
MW16 - Chlorinated Ethene Concentration Trends
Vinyl Chloride
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Trichloroethene
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:57
Prepared by: EOH
Checked by: BMC
Appendix A Figure 14
PPI Adhesives Groundwater Monitoring 2018
Page 6 of 12
AECOM Ireland Limited \\eu.aecomnet.com\EMIA\UKI\IEORK1\Jobs\PR-289971_PPI_GWM_2018\500_Deliverables\PR-289971-ACM-RP-EN-001\PPI Tables 2018
0
50
100
150
200
250
Jul-11 Apr-12 Dec-12 Aug-13 Apr-14 Dec-14 Sep-15 May-16 Jan-17 Sep-17 May-18 Feb-19
Co
ncen
trati
on
s (m
g/L
)
MW17 - Chlorinated Ethene Concentration Trends
Vinyl Chloride
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Trichloroethene
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:57
Prepared by: EOH
Checked by: BMC
Appendix A Figure 15
PPI Adhesives Groundwater Monitoring 2018
Page 7 of 12
AECOM Ireland Limited \\eu.aecomnet.com\EMIA\UKI\IEORK1\Jobs\PR-289971_PPI_GWM_2018\500_Deliverables\PR-289971-ACM-RP-EN-001\PPI Tables 2018
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
Oct-95 Aug-97 Jun-99 Mar-01 Jan-03 Nov-04 Aug-06 Jun-08 Apr-10 Feb-12 Nov-13 Sep-15 Jul-17 Apr-19
Co
ncen
trati
on
s (m
g/L
)
PPI Well - Chlorinated Ethene Concentration Trends
Vinyl Chloride
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Trichloroethene
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:57
Prepared by: EOH
Checked by: BMC
Appendix A Figure 16
PPI Adhesives Groundwater Monitoring 2018
Page 8 of 12
AECOM Ireland Limited \\eu.aecomnet.com\EMIA\UKI\IEORK1\Jobs\PR-289971_PPI_GWM_2018\500_Deliverables\PR-289971-ACM-RP-EN-001\PPI Tables 2018
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
Aug-97 Jun-99 Mar-01 Jan-03 Nov-04 Aug-06 Jun-08 Apr-10 Feb-12 Nov-13 Sep-15 Jul-17 Apr-19
Co
ncen
trati
on
s (m
g/L
)
404 - Chlorinated Ethene Concentration Trends
Vinyl Chloride
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Trichloroethene
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:57
Prepared by: EOH
Checked by: BMC
Appendix A Figure 17
PPI Adhesives Groundwater Monitoring 2018
Page 9 of 12
AECOM Ireland Limited \\eu.aecomnet.com\EMIA\UKI\IEORK1\Jobs\PR-289971_PPI_GWM_2018\500_Deliverables\PR-289971-ACM-RP-EN-001\PPI Tables 2018
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Aug-97 Jun-99 Mar-01 Jan-03 Nov-04 Aug-06 Jun-08 Apr-10 Feb-12 Nov-13 Sep-15 Jul-17 Apr-19
Co
ncen
trati
on
s (m
g/L
)
504 - Chlorinated Ethene Concentration Trends
Vinyl Chloride
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Trichloroethene
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:57
Prepared by: EOH
Checked by: BMC
Appendix A Figure 18
PPI Adhesives Groundwater Monitoring 2018
Page 10 of 12
AECOM Ireland Limited \\eu.aecomnet.com\EMIA\UKI\IEORK1\Jobs\PR-289971_PPI_GWM_2018\500_Deliverables\PR-289971-ACM-RP-EN-001\PPI Tables 2018
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Aug-97 Jun-99 Mar-01 Jan-03 Nov-04 Aug-06 Jun-08 Apr-10 Feb-12 Nov-13 Sep-15 Jul-17 Apr-19
Co
ncen
trati
on
s (m
g/L
)
505 - Chlorinated Ethene Concentration Trends
Vinyl Chloride
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Trichloroethene
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:57
Prepared by: BMC
Checked by: EOHAppendix A Figure 19
PPI Adhesives Groundwater Monitoring 2018
AECOM Ireland Limited \\eu.aecomnet.com\EMIA\UKI\IEORK1\Jobs\PR-289971_PPI_GWM_2018\500_Deliverables\PR-289971-ACM-RP-EN-001\PPI Tables 2018
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225
Co
ncen
trati
on
(m
g/L
)
Distance from PPI Well (m)
Concentration vs Distance
TCE
cDCE
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:57
Prepared by: EOH
Checked by: BMCAppendix A Figure 20
PPI Adhesives Groundwater Monitoring 2018
AECOM Ireland Limited \\eu.aecomnet.com\EMIA\UKI\IEORK1\Jobs\PR-289971_PPI_GWM_2018\500_Deliverables\PR-289971-ACM-RP-EN-001\PPI Tables 2018
y = -0.0004x + 20.496 R² = 0.9414
y = -0.0003x + 19.411 R² = 0.8434
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Apr-01 Jan-04 Oct-06 Jul-09 Apr-12 Dec-14 Sep-17 Jun-20
Natu
ral
Lo
g o
f C
on
cen
trati
on
(m
g/L
) Concentration vs Time Degradation Rate
TCE
cDCE
Linear (TCE)
Linear (cDCE)
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:57
PPI Groundwater Monitoring 2018
Project reference: PR-289971-ACM-EN-RP-001
Prepared for: PPI Adhesive Products Limited
AECOM
Appendix B Tables
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:57
Prepared by: BMC
Checked by: EOHAppendix A - Sample Inventory 2018
PPI Adhesive Products Limited, Waterford
Dip
MeasurementField WQ VOCs
Biodegradation
and Redox
Indicators
TPH-CWG
MW1 x ~ ~ ~ ~
MW2 x ~ ~ ~ ~
MW3 x ~ ~ ~ ~
MW4 x ~ ~ ~ ~
MW5 x ~ ~ ~ ~
MW6 x ~ ~ ~ ~
MW7 x ~ ~ ~ ~
MW8 x ~ ~ ~ ~
MW9 x ~ ~ ~ ~
MW10 x ~ ~ ~ ~
MW11 x ~ ~ ~ ~
MW12 x ~ ~ ~ ~
MW13 x ~ ~ ~ ~
MW14 x ~ ~ ~ ~
MW15 x ~ ~ ~ ~
MW16 x x x x x
MW17 x x x x x
MW18 x ~ ~ ~ ~
MW19 x x x x x
MW20 x x x x xPPI Well x x x x x
101* x ~ ~ ~ ~
301* x ~ ~ ~ ~
302* x ~ ~ ~ ~
303* x ~ ~ ~ ~
401* x ~ ~ ~ ~
402* x ~ ~ ~ ~
404* x x x x ~
501* x x x x ~
504* x x x x ~
505* x x x x ~
603* x ~ ~ ~ ~
TBH2** x ~ ~ ~ ~
TBH3** x ~ ~ ~ ~
TBH4** x ~ ~ ~ ~
TBH5** x ~ ~ ~ ~
Notes:
x = Indicates parameter to be measured or scheduled for analysis
~ = Indicates well not sampled/parameter not analysed
* = Honeywell Process Solutions groundwater monitoring well
** = Waterford City Council groundwater monitoring well around Teva site
VOC = Volatile organic compound
Well ID
Field WQ - Water quality parameters (pH, electrical conductivity, dissolved oxygen, redox potential and
temperature)
Biodegradation and Redox Indicators = Dissolved iron and manganese, chloride, sulphate, nitrate and
nitrite, total alkalinity
TPH-CWG = Total petroleum hydrocarbons criteria working group, speciated aliphatics and aromatics
PPI Shallow
Monitoring
Wells
PPI Bedrock
Aquifer
Monitoring
Wells
Installed by
Other
Businesses
in Industrial
Estate
Installed by
Waterford
City Council
AECOM Ireland Limited\\eu.aecomnet.com\EMIA\UKI\IEORK1\Jobs\PR-289971_PPI_GWM_2018\500_Deliverables\PR-289971-ACM-RP-EN-
001\PPI Tables 2018
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:57
Prepared by: BMC
Checked by: EOHTable 2 - Well Co-Ordinates and Depth Measurements - 18 June 2018 -
PPI Adhesive Products - Waterford
Depth to Groundwater
m bct
Groundwater Elevation
m OD
MW1 27.773 4.01 2.0 258296.102 110687.829 2.416 25.357 ~ ~
MW2 27.947 3.27 2.0 258289.978 110681.987 3.273 24.674 ~ ~
MW3 28.195 3.20 2.0 258288.368 110675.286 2.544 25.651 ~ ~
MW4 28.281 3.71 2.0 258289.124 110671.030 2.450 25.831 ~ ~
MW5 28.425 3.96 2.0 258290.432 110665.707 3.291 25.134 ~ ~
MW6 28.237 Blocked 2.0 258295.872 110673.561 Blocked ~ ~ ~
MW7 28.353 1.70 1.0 258298.511 110667.677 1.623 26.730 ~ ~
MW8 28.207 3.90 2.0 258283.938 110670.122 3.860 24.347 ~ ~
MW9 28.370 3.82 2.0 258284.291 110664.057 3.710 24.660 ~ ~
MW10 28.243 3.71 2.0 258276.181 110668.371 2.652 25.591 ~ ~
MW11 28.141 3.89 2.0 258269.985 110670.242 3.340 24.801 ~ ~
MW12 28.313 3.40 2.0 258267.407 110664.192 3.390 24.923 ~ ~
MW13 28.376 3.84 2.0 258270.434 110660.819 2.862 25.514 ~ ~
MW14 28.406 4.03 2.0 258264.103 110657.463 3.383 25.023 ~ ~
MW15 28.196 3.79 2.0 258260.953 110666.208 3.787 24.409 ~ ~
MW16 28.305 16.92 6.0 258283.028 110669.760 9.295 19.010 ~ ~
MW17 27.850 17.12 3.0 258295.283 110687.575 9.583 18.267 ~ ~
MW18 25.680 17.22 3.0 258456.403 110716.894 12.060 13.620 ~ ~
MW19 28.374 15.26 4.0 258281.585 110588.118 9.533 18.841 ~ ~
MW20 28.355 17.09 6.0 258269.154 110665.790 9.999 18.356 ~ ~
PPI Well 28.233 18.29 3.0 258285.928 110674.130 12.151 16.082 ~ ~
101 28.806 24.44 16.0 258227.523 110840.314 17.527 11.279 ~ ~
301 28.401 Blocked 5.0 258270.958 110807.018 Blocked ~ ~ ~
302 28.326 Blocked 6.0 258250.547 110902.625 Blocked ~ ~ ~
303 28.412 22.63 6.0 258292.721 110908.966 17.170 11.242 ~ ~
401 ~ Blocked 4.0 ~ ~ Blocked ~ ~ ~
402 28.518 30.75 3.0 258289.518 110908.317 17.120 11.398 ~ ~
404 28.151 25.38 4.0 258325.265 110819.747 17.002 11.149 ~ ~
501 28.428 29.51 18.0 258329.890 110877.775 17.413 11.015 ~ ~
504 25.585 28.10 9.0 258479.248 110953.756 14.935 10.650 ~ ~
505 24.993 28.87 9.0 258496.642 110873.486 14.329 10.664 ~ ~
603 28.789 No access ~ ~ ~ No access ~ ~ ~
TBH1 30.350 Destroyed 12.5 258066.976 110731.546 ~ ~ ~ ~
TBH2 29.320 26.16 16.5 258141.972 110645.721 7.549 21.771 ~ ~
TBH3 29.380 28.42 14.7 258185.135 110704.330 17.142 12.238 ~ ~
TBH4 29.340 Buried 15.0 258180.146 110725.656 ~ ~ ~ ~
TBH5 29.310 29.78 13.0 258211.654 110752.689 17.273 12.037 ~ ~
Note:
m bct - metres below casing top
~ - not measured
NAPL - non aqueous phase liquid
NAPL
Thickness
Installed by
Waterford
City Council
m OD - metres relative to Ordnance Datum, elevations for PPI wells are taken from AECOM/URS 2012 survey, elevations for other wells are taken from FCG surveys in 2009 and
2011 for the Environmental Protection Agency and Waterford City Council respectively.
Monitoring
Point
PPI Shallow
Monitoring
Wells
PPI
Bedrock
Aquifer
Monitoring
Wells
Installed by
Other
Businesses
in Industrial
Estate
Depth to
NAPL18-Jun-18
Northing Co-
Ordinate
m
Well
Elevation
m OD
Total Depth
m bct
Easting Co-
Ordinate
m
Screen
Length
m
AECOM Ireland Limited \\eu.aecomnet.com\EMIA\UKI\IEORK1\Jobs\PR-289971_PPI_GWM_2018\500_Deliverables\PR-289971-ACM-RP-EN-001\PPI Tables 2018
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:57
Prepared by: BMC
Checked by: EOHTable 3 - Water Quality Field Parameters - 2018
PPI Adhesive Products - Waterford
Monitoring
Point
DO
mg/LpH
Eh
mV
EC
mS/cm
TempoC
3 x Well
Volume L
Purged
Volume LComments
MW16 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 45 45 Cloudy brown water with LNAPL globules
MW17 3.8 6.5 326 357 16.7 45 45 Dark cloudy, brown water, NVO.
MW19 5.0 6.5 322 404 16.6 33 33 Clear water, NVO.
MW20 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 42 32*LNAPL globules with strong hydrocarbon
odour. Well purged dry
PPI Well 2.4 6.6 348 350 15.2 36 36 Cloudy brown water, NVO.
404 4.4 6.5 308 349 18.4 50 50 Clear water, NVO.
501 4.4 6.3 354 309 15.8 72 75 Cloudy brown water, NVO.Sediment in bucket
504 3.2 6.7 271 431 15.0 78 78 Clear water, NVO.
505 3.5 6.5 391 406 15.2 87 90 Clear water, NVO.
Note:
NM - Not measured NVO - No visual or olfactory evidence of contamination
DO - Dissolved oxygen mg/L - Milligrams per litre
Eh - Redox potential mV - Millivolts
EC - Electrical conductivity mS/cm - Microsiemens per centimetre
Temp - Temperature oC - Degrees Celsius
* - Well purged dry before three well volumes removed
As recommended by instrument manufacturer, field redox potential (ORP) readings were adjusted to give corresponding Eh readings.
AECOM Ireland Limited \\eu.aecomnet.com\EMIA\UKI\IEORK1\Jobs\PR-289971_PPI_GWM_2018\500_Deliverables\PR-289971-ACM-RP-EN-001\PPI Tables 2018
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:57
Updated by: EOH
Checked by: BMCTable 4 - Bedrock Groundwater Volatile Organic Compound Results (mg/L) 2018 - PPI Adhesive Products - Waterford
MW18
Jun-18 Feb-12 Mar-13 Aug-14 Jun-15 Nov-16 Jun-17 Jun-18 Feb-12 Mar-13 Aug-14 Jun-15 Sep-16 Jun-17 Jun-18 Feb-12
Dichlorodifluoromethane <2 ---- ---- 190 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
MTBE <0.1 10 ---- Sat - - - - - - - - - - - 0.2 - - -Chloromethane <3 ---- ---- 14800 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Vinyl Chloride <0.1 0.375 2.25 741 86 48 66 13 6 8 3 - - - - 0.5 0.4 - -Bromomethane <1 ---- ---- 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Chloroethane <3 ---- ---- Sat - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Trichlorofluoromethane <3 ---- ---- 230000 4 6 - - - - - 30 17 13 12 12 5 4 -1,1-Dichloroethene <3 ---- 30 * ---- 210000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Carbon Disulphide NA ---- ---- 67200 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NADichloromethane <5 15 ---- 20 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <3 0.375 30 * ---- 197000 6 - - 4 - 3 - - - - - - - - -1,1-Dichloroethane <3 ---- ---- 3200000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <3 0.375 30 * 130 147000 2,214 725 367 15 13 4 5 192 62 125 213 228 93 16 -2,2-Dichloropropane <1 ---- ---- No criteria - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Bromochloromethane <2 ---- ---- 83 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Chloroform <2 ---- ---- 991000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,1,1-Trichloroethane <2 ---- ---- Sat 5 - - - - - - 10 8 - - - - - -1,1-Dichloropropene <3 ---- ---- No criteria - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Carbon Tetrachloride <2 ---- ---- No criteria - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,2-Dichloroethane <2 2.25 ---- 7130 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Benzene <0.5 0.75 ---- 243000 - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - -Trichloroethene <3 7.5 10 ,70** 48.6 65300 65 47 28 - - - - 90 54 49 88 70 63 9 -
1,2-Dichloropropane <2 ---- ---- 31300 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Dibromomethane <3 ---- ---- 7.9 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Bromodichloromethane <2 ---- ---- 15100 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <2 ---- ---- No criteria - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Toluene <5 525 ---- Sat - - - - - - - 3 - - - - - - -trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <2 ---- ---- No criteria - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,1,2-Trichloroethane <2 ---- ---- 388000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Tetrachloroethene <3 7.5 10 ,40*** ---- Sat - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,3-Dichloropropane <2 ---- ---- 0.1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Dibromochloromethane <2 ---- ---- Sat - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,2-Dibromoethane <2 ---- ---- 0.1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Chlorobenzene <2 ---- ---- 191000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <2 ---- ---- 257000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Ethyl Benzene <1 ---- ---- Sat - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -m,p-Xylene <2 ---- 10 **** ---- Sat - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -o-Xylene <1 ---- 10 **** ---- Sat - - - 1 1 4 2 - - - - - - - -Styrene <2 ---- ---- Sat - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Bromoform <2 ---- ---- 2340000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Isopropylbenzene <3 ---- ---- Sat - - 13 - - 3 - - - - - - - - -1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <4 ---- ---- 843000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Bromobenzene <2 ---- ---- 198000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,2,3-Trichloropropane <3 ---- ---- 0.00065 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Propylbenzene <3 ---- ---- Sat - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -2-Chlorotoluene <3 ---- ---- Sat - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <3 ---- ---- 32200 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -4-Chlorotoluene <3 ---- ---- Sat - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -tert-Butylbenzene <3 ---- ---- No criteria - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <3 ---- ---- 30300 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -sec-Butylbenzene <3 ---- ---- Sat - - - - 5 65 3 - - - - - - - -p-Isopropyltoluene <3 ---- ---- Sat - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,3-Dichlorobenzene <3 ---- ---- 35400 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,4-Dichlorobenzene <3 ---- ---- Sat - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -n-Butylbenzene <3 ---- ---- Sat - - 31 - 3 31 - - - - - - - - -1,2-Dichlorobenzene <3 ---- ---- Sat - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane <2 ---- ---- 0.1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <3 ---- 0.4 ***** ---- Sat - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Hexachlorobutadiene <3 ---- ---- 3840 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Naphthalene <2 ---- ---- Sat - - - - - - 6 - - - - - - - -
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <3 ---- 0.4 ***** ---- Sat - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Notes:
N/A - not analysed
Underline - indicates result above GTV- Indicates result below method detection limit, not specified.
Sat - indicates no GAC due to calculated saturation of the vapour pathway.
----
----
----
2
----
----
12
SSTL = site specific target level *****IGV is for the sum of trichlorobenzenes
***Two IGVs are given for tetrachloroetheneGAC - generic assessment criteria
**Two IGVs are given for trichloroethene
GTV - Groundwater Threshold Value, Statutory Instrument No. 366 of 2016. Indicates result above IGV
****IGV is for the sum of xylenes
----
----
----
----
500
----
----
Volatile Organic CompoundsHuman Health
Commercial GAC
GTV
(mg/L)
Controlled
Waters
SSTL
MDL
----
----
----
----
----
1
----
1
----
----
----
10
IGV
(mg/L)
1
0.1
----
10
10
----
30----
----
----
----
----
----
10
----
3
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
IGV - EPA Interim Guideline Value for the protection of groundwater
*IGV is for the sum of dichloroethenes
Deep Groundwater Monitoring Well
MW16 MW17
AECOM Ireland Limited \\eu.aecomnet.com\EMIA\UKI\IEORK1\Jobs\PR-289971_PPI_GWM_2018\500_Deliverables\PR-289971-ACM-RP-EN-001\PPI Tables 2018
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:57
Updated by: EOH
Checked by: BMCTable 4 - Bedrock Groundwater Volatile Organic Compound Results (mg/L) 2018 - PPI Adhesive Products - Waterford
Jun-18
Dichlorodifluoromethane <2 ---- ---- 190
MTBE <0.1 10 ---- SatChloromethane <3 ---- ---- 14800Vinyl Chloride <0.1 0.375 2.25 741Bromomethane <1 ---- ---- 7Chloroethane <3 ---- ---- SatTrichlorofluoromethane <3 ---- ---- 2300001,1-Dichloroethene <3 ---- 30 * ---- 210000Carbon Disulphide NA ---- ---- 67200Dichloromethane <5 15 ---- 20trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <3 0.375 30 * ---- 1970001,1-Dichloroethane <3 ---- ---- 3200000cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <3 0.375 30 * 130 1470002,2-Dichloropropane <1 ---- ---- No criteriaBromochloromethane <2 ---- ---- 83Chloroform <2 ---- ---- 9910001,1,1-Trichloroethane <2 ---- ---- Sat1,1-Dichloropropene <3 ---- ---- No criteriaCarbon Tetrachloride <2 ---- ---- No criteria1,2-Dichloroethane <2 2.25 ---- 7130Benzene <0.5 0.75 ---- 243000Trichloroethene <3 7.5 10 ,70** 48.6 65300
1,2-Dichloropropane <2 ---- ---- 31300Dibromomethane <3 ---- ---- 7.9Bromodichloromethane <2 ---- ---- 15100cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <2 ---- ---- No criteriaToluene <5 525 ---- Sattrans-1,3-Dichloropropene <2 ---- ---- No criteria1,1,2-Trichloroethane <2 ---- ---- 388000Tetrachloroethene <3 7.5 10 ,40*** ---- Sat1,3-Dichloropropane <2 ---- ---- 0.1Dibromochloromethane <2 ---- ---- Sat1,2-Dibromoethane <2 ---- ---- 0.1Chlorobenzene <2 ---- ---- 1910001,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <2 ---- ---- 257000Ethyl Benzene <1 ---- ---- Satm,p-Xylene <2 ---- 10 **** ---- Sato-Xylene <1 ---- 10 **** ---- SatStyrene <2 ---- ---- SatBromoform <2 ---- ---- 2340000Isopropylbenzene <3 ---- ---- Sat1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <4 ---- ---- 843000Bromobenzene <2 ---- ---- 1980001,2,3-Trichloropropane <3 ---- ---- 0.00065Propylbenzene <3 ---- ---- Sat2-Chlorotoluene <3 ---- ---- Sat1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <3 ---- ---- 322004-Chlorotoluene <3 ---- ---- Sattert-Butylbenzene <3 ---- ---- No criteria1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <3 ---- ---- 30300sec-Butylbenzene <3 ---- ---- Satp-Isopropyltoluene <3 ---- ---- Sat1,3-Dichlorobenzene <3 ---- ---- 354001,4-Dichlorobenzene <3 ---- ---- Satn-Butylbenzene <3 ---- ---- Sat1,2-Dichlorobenzene <3 ---- ---- Sat1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane <2 ---- ---- 0.11,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <3 ---- 0.4 ***** ---- SatHexachlorobutadiene <3 ---- ---- 3840Naphthalene <2 ---- ---- Sat
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <3 ---- 0.4 ***** ---- Sat
Notes:
N/A - not analysed
Underline - indicates result above GTV- Indicates result below method detection limit, not specified.
Sat - indicates no GAC due to calculated saturation of the vapour pathway.
----
----
----
2
----
----
12
SSTL = site specific target level
GAC - generic assessment criteria
GTV - Groundwater Threshold Value, Statutory Instrument No. 366 of 2016.
----
----
----
----
500
----
----
Volatile Organic CompoundsHuman Health
Commercial GAC
GTV
(mg/L)
Controlled
Waters
SSTL
MDL
----
----
----
----
----
1
----
1
----
----
----
10
IGV
(mg/L)
1
0.1
----
10
10
----
30----
----
----
----
----
----
10
----
3
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
Feb-12 Mar-13 Aug-14 Jun-15 Sep-16 Jun-17 Jun-18 Feb-12 Mar-13 Aug-14 Jun-15 Sep-16 Jun-17 Jun-18
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - 26 7 1 - 0.6 0.8 0.7
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - 4 - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - 207 49 - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - 16 - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - 10 3 -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
*****IGV is for the sum of trichlorobenzenes
Indicates result above IGV
*IGV is for the sum of dichloroethenes
**Two IGVs are given for trichloroethene
***Two IGVs are given for tetrachloroethene
****IGV is for the sum of xylenes
Deep Groundwater Monitoring Well
MW20
IGV - EPA Interim Guideline Value for the protection of groundwater
MW19
AECOM Ireland Limited \\eu.aecomnet.com\EMIA\UKI\IEORK1\Jobs\PR-289971_PPI_GWM_2018\500_Deliverables\PR-289971-ACM-RP-EN-001\PPI Tables 2018
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:57
Updated by: EOH
Checked by: BMCTable 4 - Bedrock Groundwater Volatile Organic Compound Results (mg/L) 2018 - PPI Adhesive Products - Waterford
Jun-18
Dichlorodifluoromethane <2 ---- ---- 190
MTBE <0.1 10 ---- SatChloromethane <3 ---- ---- 14800Vinyl Chloride <0.1 0.375 2.25 741Bromomethane <1 ---- ---- 7Chloroethane <3 ---- ---- SatTrichlorofluoromethane <3 ---- ---- 2300001,1-Dichloroethene <3 ---- 30 * ---- 210000Carbon Disulphide NA ---- ---- 67200Dichloromethane <5 15 ---- 20trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <3 0.375 30 * ---- 1970001,1-Dichloroethane <3 ---- ---- 3200000cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <3 0.375 30 * 130 1470002,2-Dichloropropane <1 ---- ---- No criteriaBromochloromethane <2 ---- ---- 83Chloroform <2 ---- ---- 9910001,1,1-Trichloroethane <2 ---- ---- Sat1,1-Dichloropropene <3 ---- ---- No criteriaCarbon Tetrachloride <2 ---- ---- No criteria1,2-Dichloroethane <2 2.25 ---- 7130Benzene <0.5 0.75 ---- 243000Trichloroethene <3 7.5 10 ,70** 48.6 65300
1,2-Dichloropropane <2 ---- ---- 31300Dibromomethane <3 ---- ---- 7.9Bromodichloromethane <2 ---- ---- 15100cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <2 ---- ---- No criteriaToluene <5 525 ---- Sattrans-1,3-Dichloropropene <2 ---- ---- No criteria1,1,2-Trichloroethane <2 ---- ---- 388000Tetrachloroethene <3 7.5 10 ,40*** ---- Sat1,3-Dichloropropane <2 ---- ---- 0.1Dibromochloromethane <2 ---- ---- Sat1,2-Dibromoethane <2 ---- ---- 0.1Chlorobenzene <2 ---- ---- 1910001,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <2 ---- ---- 257000Ethyl Benzene <1 ---- ---- Satm,p-Xylene <2 ---- 10 **** ---- Sato-Xylene <1 ---- 10 **** ---- SatStyrene <2 ---- ---- SatBromoform <2 ---- ---- 2340000Isopropylbenzene <3 ---- ---- Sat1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <4 ---- ---- 843000Bromobenzene <2 ---- ---- 1980001,2,3-Trichloropropane <3 ---- ---- 0.00065Propylbenzene <3 ---- ---- Sat2-Chlorotoluene <3 ---- ---- Sat1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <3 ---- ---- 322004-Chlorotoluene <3 ---- ---- Sattert-Butylbenzene <3 ---- ---- No criteria1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <3 ---- ---- 30300sec-Butylbenzene <3 ---- ---- Satp-Isopropyltoluene <3 ---- ---- Sat1,3-Dichlorobenzene <3 ---- ---- 354001,4-Dichlorobenzene <3 ---- ---- Satn-Butylbenzene <3 ---- ---- Sat1,2-Dichlorobenzene <3 ---- ---- Sat1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane <2 ---- ---- 0.11,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <3 ---- 0.4 ***** ---- SatHexachlorobutadiene <3 ---- ---- 3840Naphthalene <2 ---- ---- Sat
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <3 ---- 0.4 ***** ---- Sat
Notes:
N/A - not analysed
Underline - indicates result above GTV- Indicates result below method detection limit, not specified.
Sat - indicates no GAC due to calculated saturation of the vapour pathway.
----
----
----
2
----
----
12
SSTL = site specific target level
GAC - generic assessment criteria
GTV - Groundwater Threshold Value, Statutory Instrument No. 366 of 2016.
----
----
----
----
500
----
----
Volatile Organic CompoundsHuman Health
Commercial GAC
GTV
(mg/L)
Controlled
Waters
SSTL
MDL
----
----
----
----
----
1
----
1
----
----
----
10
IGV
(mg/L)
1
0.1
----
10
10
----
30----
----
----
----
----
----
10
----
3
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
Nov-97 Jul-98 Aug-98 Sep-98 Nov-98 Nov-98 Jan-99 Dec-02 Jan-04 Jun-04 Dec-04 Dec-05 Dec-06 Dec-07 Feb-12 Mar-13 Aug-14 Jun-15 Sep-16 Jun-17 Jun-18
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - NA - NA - - - 7 - - - - - - - - - -
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
31 - 72 - 34 - - 28 21 16 30 - 24 22 52 24 22 18 29 38 27
NA NA NA NA NA - NA - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NA NA NA NA NA - NA - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- 3 - - 7 - 10 - - 1 9 19 29 - 13 8 5 9 6 5 4
- 3 4 2 3 - 11 - 7 7 8 8 8 - - - - - - - -
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - - - - - NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
- - - - - - NA - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
6 5 6 3 6 - 9 - 3 2 3 - - - 6 4 4 5 4 4 4
- 2 2 2 2 - 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
4,300 2,400 3,900 2,300 4,700 3,500 4,700 8,482 4,771 4,598 4,515 5,502 5,693 3,340 3,423 2,249 2,814 2,227 1,576 1,615 802
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - NA - 2 2 1 - - - - - - - - - -
22 18 21 12 23 15 18 24 13 14 13 15 14 - 8 - - - - - 4
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - NA - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
310 280 330 220 320 330 470 792 518 482 610 569 457 403 176 139 113 187 130 109 79
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - 2 2 - - - 2 - - - - - - - - - - - -
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
IGV - EPA Interim Guideline Value for the protection of groundwater
Indicates result above IGV
*IGV is for the sum of dichloroethenes
**Two IGVs are given for trichloroethene
***Two IGVs are given for tetrachloroethene
****IGV is for the sum of xylenes
*****IGV is for the sum of trichlorobenzenes
PPI Well
Deep Groundwater Monitoring Well
AECOM Ireland Limited \\eu.aecomnet.com\EMIA\UKI\IEORK1\Jobs\PR-289971_PPI_GWM_2018\500_Deliverables\PR-289971-ACM-RP-EN-001\PPI Tables 2018
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:57
Updated by: EOH
Checked by: BMCTable 4 - Bedrock Groundwater Volatile Organic Compound Results (mg/L) 2018 - PPI Adhesive Products - Waterford
Jun-18
Dichlorodifluoromethane <2 ---- ---- 190
MTBE <0.1 10 ---- SatChloromethane <3 ---- ---- 14800Vinyl Chloride <0.1 0.375 2.25 741Bromomethane <1 ---- ---- 7Chloroethane <3 ---- ---- SatTrichlorofluoromethane <3 ---- ---- 2300001,1-Dichloroethene <3 ---- 30 * ---- 210000Carbon Disulphide NA ---- ---- 67200Dichloromethane <5 15 ---- 20trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <3 0.375 30 * ---- 1970001,1-Dichloroethane <3 ---- ---- 3200000cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <3 0.375 30 * 130 1470002,2-Dichloropropane <1 ---- ---- No criteriaBromochloromethane <2 ---- ---- 83Chloroform <2 ---- ---- 9910001,1,1-Trichloroethane <2 ---- ---- Sat1,1-Dichloropropene <3 ---- ---- No criteriaCarbon Tetrachloride <2 ---- ---- No criteria1,2-Dichloroethane <2 2.25 ---- 7130Benzene <0.5 0.75 ---- 243000Trichloroethene <3 7.5 10 ,70** 48.6 65300
1,2-Dichloropropane <2 ---- ---- 31300Dibromomethane <3 ---- ---- 7.9Bromodichloromethane <2 ---- ---- 15100cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <2 ---- ---- No criteriaToluene <5 525 ---- Sattrans-1,3-Dichloropropene <2 ---- ---- No criteria1,1,2-Trichloroethane <2 ---- ---- 388000Tetrachloroethene <3 7.5 10 ,40*** ---- Sat1,3-Dichloropropane <2 ---- ---- 0.1Dibromochloromethane <2 ---- ---- Sat1,2-Dibromoethane <2 ---- ---- 0.1Chlorobenzene <2 ---- ---- 1910001,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <2 ---- ---- 257000Ethyl Benzene <1 ---- ---- Satm,p-Xylene <2 ---- 10 **** ---- Sato-Xylene <1 ---- 10 **** ---- SatStyrene <2 ---- ---- SatBromoform <2 ---- ---- 2340000Isopropylbenzene <3 ---- ---- Sat1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <4 ---- ---- 843000Bromobenzene <2 ---- ---- 1980001,2,3-Trichloropropane <3 ---- ---- 0.00065Propylbenzene <3 ---- ---- Sat2-Chlorotoluene <3 ---- ---- Sat1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <3 ---- ---- 322004-Chlorotoluene <3 ---- ---- Sattert-Butylbenzene <3 ---- ---- No criteria1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <3 ---- ---- 30300sec-Butylbenzene <3 ---- ---- Satp-Isopropyltoluene <3 ---- ---- Sat1,3-Dichlorobenzene <3 ---- ---- 354001,4-Dichlorobenzene <3 ---- ---- Satn-Butylbenzene <3 ---- ---- Sat1,2-Dichlorobenzene <3 ---- ---- Sat1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane <2 ---- ---- 0.11,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <3 ---- 0.4 ***** ---- SatHexachlorobutadiene <3 ---- ---- 3840Naphthalene <2 ---- ---- Sat
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <3 ---- 0.4 ***** ---- Sat
Notes:
N/A - not analysed
Underline - indicates result above GTV- Indicates result below method detection limit, not specified.
Sat - indicates no GAC due to calculated saturation of the vapour pathway.
----
----
----
2
----
----
12
SSTL = site specific target level
GAC - generic assessment criteria
GTV - Groundwater Threshold Value, Statutory Instrument No. 366 of 2016.
----
----
----
----
500
----
----
Volatile Organic CompoundsHuman Health
Commercial GAC
GTV
(mg/L)
Controlled
Waters
SSTL
MDL
----
----
----
----
----
1
----
1
----
----
----
10
IGV
(mg/L)
1
0.1
----
10
10
----
30----
----
----
----
----
----
10
----
3
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
Dec-08 Jul-11 Mar-13 Aug-14 Jun-15
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
8,600 8,050 5,802 3,675 3,342
- - - - -
- - NA NA NA
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - 7 - -
- 1 - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- 1 - - -
14 - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- 3 - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- 1 - - -
- - - - -
Down Gradient Deep Groundwater Monitoring Well
301
IGV - EPA Interim Guideline Value for the protection of
groundwater
*****IGV is for the sum of trichlorobenzenes
****IGV is for the sum of xylenes
***Two IGVs are given for tetrachloroethene
Indicates result above IGV
**Two IGVs are given for trichloroethene
*IGV is for the sum of dichloroethenes
AECOM Ireland Limited \\eu.aecomnet.com\EMIA\UKI\IEORK1\Jobs\PR-289971_PPI_GWM_2018\500_Deliverables\PR-289971-ACM-RP-EN-001\PPI Tables 2018
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:57
Updated by: EOH
Checked by: BMCTable 4 - Bedrock Groundwater Volatile Organic Compound Results (mg/L) 2018 - PPI Adhesive Products - Waterford
Jun-18
Dichlorodifluoromethane <2 ---- ---- 190
MTBE <0.1 10 ---- SatChloromethane <3 ---- ---- 14800Vinyl Chloride <0.1 0.375 2.25 741Bromomethane <1 ---- ---- 7Chloroethane <3 ---- ---- SatTrichlorofluoromethane <3 ---- ---- 2300001,1-Dichloroethene <3 ---- 30 * ---- 210000Carbon Disulphide NA ---- ---- 67200Dichloromethane <5 15 ---- 20trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <3 0.375 30 * ---- 1970001,1-Dichloroethane <3 ---- ---- 3200000cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <3 0.375 30 * 130 1470002,2-Dichloropropane <1 ---- ---- No criteriaBromochloromethane <2 ---- ---- 83Chloroform <2 ---- ---- 9910001,1,1-Trichloroethane <2 ---- ---- Sat1,1-Dichloropropene <3 ---- ---- No criteriaCarbon Tetrachloride <2 ---- ---- No criteria1,2-Dichloroethane <2 2.25 ---- 7130Benzene <0.5 0.75 ---- 243000Trichloroethene <3 7.5 10 ,70** 48.6 65300
1,2-Dichloropropane <2 ---- ---- 31300Dibromomethane <3 ---- ---- 7.9Bromodichloromethane <2 ---- ---- 15100cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <2 ---- ---- No criteriaToluene <5 525 ---- Sattrans-1,3-Dichloropropene <2 ---- ---- No criteria1,1,2-Trichloroethane <2 ---- ---- 388000Tetrachloroethene <3 7.5 10 ,40*** ---- Sat1,3-Dichloropropane <2 ---- ---- 0.1Dibromochloromethane <2 ---- ---- Sat1,2-Dibromoethane <2 ---- ---- 0.1Chlorobenzene <2 ---- ---- 1910001,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <2 ---- ---- 257000Ethyl Benzene <1 ---- ---- Satm,p-Xylene <2 ---- 10 **** ---- Sato-Xylene <1 ---- 10 **** ---- SatStyrene <2 ---- ---- SatBromoform <2 ---- ---- 2340000Isopropylbenzene <3 ---- ---- Sat1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <4 ---- ---- 843000Bromobenzene <2 ---- ---- 1980001,2,3-Trichloropropane <3 ---- ---- 0.00065Propylbenzene <3 ---- ---- Sat2-Chlorotoluene <3 ---- ---- Sat1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <3 ---- ---- 322004-Chlorotoluene <3 ---- ---- Sattert-Butylbenzene <3 ---- ---- No criteria1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <3 ---- ---- 30300sec-Butylbenzene <3 ---- ---- Satp-Isopropyltoluene <3 ---- ---- Sat1,3-Dichlorobenzene <3 ---- ---- 354001,4-Dichlorobenzene <3 ---- ---- Satn-Butylbenzene <3 ---- ---- Sat1,2-Dichlorobenzene <3 ---- ---- Sat1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane <2 ---- ---- 0.11,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <3 ---- 0.4 ***** ---- SatHexachlorobutadiene <3 ---- ---- 3840Naphthalene <2 ---- ---- Sat
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <3 ---- 0.4 ***** ---- Sat
Notes:
N/A - not analysed
Underline - indicates result above GTV- Indicates result below method detection limit, not specified.
Sat - indicates no GAC due to calculated saturation of the vapour pathway.
----
----
----
2
----
----
12
SSTL = site specific target level
GAC - generic assessment criteria
GTV - Groundwater Threshold Value, Statutory Instrument No. 366 of 2016.
----
----
----
----
500
----
----
Volatile Organic CompoundsHuman Health
Commercial GAC
GTV
(mg/L)
Controlled
Waters
SSTL
MDL
----
----
----
----
----
1
----
1
----
----
----
10
IGV
(mg/L)
1
0.1
----
10
10
----
30----
----
----
----
----
----
10
----
3
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
Nov-98 Nov-98 Jan-99 Dec-02 Dec-05 Dec-06 Dec-07 Dec-08 Jun-11 Jul-11 Mar-13 Aug-14 Jun-15 Sep-16 Jun-17 Jun-18
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
371 268 435 2,737 142 3,946 5,610 3,118 4,685 4,550 3,228 2,402 2,144 1,711 949 1,209
- - - - - - <50 - - 2 - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - NA - NA NA NA NA NA NA
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
- 2 2 2 - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
169 86 64 44 - 61 <50 36 19 26 11 17 16 14 10 4
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
145 29 22 50 - 82 <50 23 9 10 15 6 8 3 7 6
23 18 17 16 51 15 <50 - 11 12 8 - - - 6 5
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
58 44 32 27 10 23 <50 18 10 20 7 7 9 8 7 4
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - 1 - <50 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - 1 - <50 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <100 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <50 - - - - - - - - -
Down Gradient Deep Groundwater Monitoring Well
404
IGV - EPA Interim Guideline Value for the protection of groundwater
Indicates result above IGV
***Two IGVs are given for tetrachloroethene
****IGV is for the sum of xylenes
*****IGV is for the sum of trichlorobenzenes
*IGV is for the sum of dichloroethenes
**Two IGVs are given for trichloroethene
AECOM Ireland Limited \\eu.aecomnet.com\EMIA\UKI\IEORK1\Jobs\PR-289971_PPI_GWM_2018\500_Deliverables\PR-289971-ACM-RP-EN-001\PPI Tables 2018
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:57
Updated by: EOH
Checked by: BMCTable 4 - Bedrock Groundwater Volatile Organic Compound Results (mg/L) 2018 - PPI Adhesive Products - Waterford
Jun-18
Dichlorodifluoromethane <2 ---- ---- 190
MTBE <0.1 10 ---- SatChloromethane <3 ---- ---- 14800Vinyl Chloride <0.1 0.375 2.25 741Bromomethane <1 ---- ---- 7Chloroethane <3 ---- ---- SatTrichlorofluoromethane <3 ---- ---- 2300001,1-Dichloroethene <3 ---- 30 * ---- 210000Carbon Disulphide NA ---- ---- 67200Dichloromethane <5 15 ---- 20trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <3 0.375 30 * ---- 1970001,1-Dichloroethane <3 ---- ---- 3200000cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <3 0.375 30 * 130 1470002,2-Dichloropropane <1 ---- ---- No criteriaBromochloromethane <2 ---- ---- 83Chloroform <2 ---- ---- 9910001,1,1-Trichloroethane <2 ---- ---- Sat1,1-Dichloropropene <3 ---- ---- No criteriaCarbon Tetrachloride <2 ---- ---- No criteria1,2-Dichloroethane <2 2.25 ---- 7130Benzene <0.5 0.75 ---- 243000Trichloroethene <3 7.5 10 ,70** 48.6 65300
1,2-Dichloropropane <2 ---- ---- 31300Dibromomethane <3 ---- ---- 7.9Bromodichloromethane <2 ---- ---- 15100cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <2 ---- ---- No criteriaToluene <5 525 ---- Sattrans-1,3-Dichloropropene <2 ---- ---- No criteria1,1,2-Trichloroethane <2 ---- ---- 388000Tetrachloroethene <3 7.5 10 ,40*** ---- Sat1,3-Dichloropropane <2 ---- ---- 0.1Dibromochloromethane <2 ---- ---- Sat1,2-Dibromoethane <2 ---- ---- 0.1Chlorobenzene <2 ---- ---- 1910001,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <2 ---- ---- 257000Ethyl Benzene <1 ---- ---- Satm,p-Xylene <2 ---- 10 **** ---- Sato-Xylene <1 ---- 10 **** ---- SatStyrene <2 ---- ---- SatBromoform <2 ---- ---- 2340000Isopropylbenzene <3 ---- ---- Sat1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <4 ---- ---- 843000Bromobenzene <2 ---- ---- 1980001,2,3-Trichloropropane <3 ---- ---- 0.00065Propylbenzene <3 ---- ---- Sat2-Chlorotoluene <3 ---- ---- Sat1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <3 ---- ---- 322004-Chlorotoluene <3 ---- ---- Sattert-Butylbenzene <3 ---- ---- No criteria1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <3 ---- ---- 30300sec-Butylbenzene <3 ---- ---- Satp-Isopropyltoluene <3 ---- ---- Sat1,3-Dichlorobenzene <3 ---- ---- 354001,4-Dichlorobenzene <3 ---- ---- Satn-Butylbenzene <3 ---- ---- Sat1,2-Dichlorobenzene <3 ---- ---- Sat1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane <2 ---- ---- 0.11,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <3 ---- 0.4 ***** ---- SatHexachlorobutadiene <3 ---- ---- 3840Naphthalene <2 ---- ---- Sat
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <3 ---- 0.4 ***** ---- Sat
Notes:
N/A - not analysed
Underline - indicates result above GTV- Indicates result below method detection limit, not specified.
Sat - indicates no GAC due to calculated saturation of the vapour pathway.
----
----
----
2
----
----
12
SSTL = site specific target level
GAC - generic assessment criteria
GTV - Groundwater Threshold Value, Statutory Instrument No. 366 of 2016.
----
----
----
----
500
----
----
Volatile Organic CompoundsHuman Health
Commercial GAC
GTV
(mg/L)
Controlled
Waters
SSTL
MDL
----
----
----
----
----
1
----
1
----
----
----
10
IGV
(mg/L)
1
0.1
----
10
10
----
30----
----
----
----
----
----
10
----
3
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
Nov-98 Nov-98 Jan-99 Dec-04 Dec-08 Jul-11 Mar-13 Aug-14 Jun-15 Sep-16 Jun-17 Jun-18
- - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -
521 163 631 89 99 146 59 132 105 120 123 104- - - - - 8 4 9 10 10 11 10- - - - - - NA NA NA NA NA NA- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - 9 4 10 12 12 12 8- - 2 - - 3 - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - 2 - - 6 3 9 11 11 12 7
12 4 15 16 20 42 15 - - - - 22- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - 2 - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- 4 - 3 - 2 - - - - - 4- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - -
*IGV is for the sum of dichloroethenes
***Two IGVs are given for tetrachloroethene
****IGV is for the sum of xylenes
*****IGV is for the sum of trichlorobenzenes
IGV - EPA Interim Guideline Value for the protection of groundwater
Indicates result above IGV
**Two IGVs are given for trichloroethene
Down Gradient Deep Groundwater Monitoring Well
501
AECOM Ireland Limited \\eu.aecomnet.com\EMIA\UKI\IEORK1\Jobs\PR-289971_PPI_GWM_2018\500_Deliverables\PR-289971-ACM-RP-EN-001\PPI Tables 2018
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:57
Updated by: EOH
Checked by: BMCTable 4 - Bedrock Groundwater Volatile Organic Compound Results (mg/L) 2018 - PPI Adhesive Products - Waterford
Jun-18
Dichlorodifluoromethane <2 ---- ---- 190
MTBE <0.1 10 ---- SatChloromethane <3 ---- ---- 14800Vinyl Chloride <0.1 0.375 2.25 741Bromomethane <1 ---- ---- 7Chloroethane <3 ---- ---- SatTrichlorofluoromethane <3 ---- ---- 2300001,1-Dichloroethene <3 ---- 30 * ---- 210000Carbon Disulphide NA ---- ---- 67200Dichloromethane <5 15 ---- 20trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <3 0.375 30 * ---- 1970001,1-Dichloroethane <3 ---- ---- 3200000cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <3 0.375 30 * 130 1470002,2-Dichloropropane <1 ---- ---- No criteriaBromochloromethane <2 ---- ---- 83Chloroform <2 ---- ---- 9910001,1,1-Trichloroethane <2 ---- ---- Sat1,1-Dichloropropene <3 ---- ---- No criteriaCarbon Tetrachloride <2 ---- ---- No criteria1,2-Dichloroethane <2 2.25 ---- 7130Benzene <0.5 0.75 ---- 243000Trichloroethene <3 7.5 10 ,70** 48.6 65300
1,2-Dichloropropane <2 ---- ---- 31300Dibromomethane <3 ---- ---- 7.9Bromodichloromethane <2 ---- ---- 15100cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <2 ---- ---- No criteriaToluene <5 525 ---- Sattrans-1,3-Dichloropropene <2 ---- ---- No criteria1,1,2-Trichloroethane <2 ---- ---- 388000Tetrachloroethene <3 7.5 10 ,40*** ---- Sat1,3-Dichloropropane <2 ---- ---- 0.1Dibromochloromethane <2 ---- ---- Sat1,2-Dibromoethane <2 ---- ---- 0.1Chlorobenzene <2 ---- ---- 1910001,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <2 ---- ---- 257000Ethyl Benzene <1 ---- ---- Satm,p-Xylene <2 ---- 10 **** ---- Sato-Xylene <1 ---- 10 **** ---- SatStyrene <2 ---- ---- SatBromoform <2 ---- ---- 2340000Isopropylbenzene <3 ---- ---- Sat1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <4 ---- ---- 843000Bromobenzene <2 ---- ---- 1980001,2,3-Trichloropropane <3 ---- ---- 0.00065Propylbenzene <3 ---- ---- Sat2-Chlorotoluene <3 ---- ---- Sat1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <3 ---- ---- 322004-Chlorotoluene <3 ---- ---- Sattert-Butylbenzene <3 ---- ---- No criteria1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <3 ---- ---- 30300sec-Butylbenzene <3 ---- ---- Satp-Isopropyltoluene <3 ---- ---- Sat1,3-Dichlorobenzene <3 ---- ---- 354001,4-Dichlorobenzene <3 ---- ---- Satn-Butylbenzene <3 ---- ---- Sat1,2-Dichlorobenzene <3 ---- ---- Sat1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane <2 ---- ---- 0.11,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <3 ---- 0.4 ***** ---- SatHexachlorobutadiene <3 ---- ---- 3840Naphthalene <2 ---- ---- Sat
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <3 ---- 0.4 ***** ---- Sat
Notes:
N/A - not analysed
Underline - indicates result above GTV- Indicates result below method detection limit, not specified.
Sat - indicates no GAC due to calculated saturation of the vapour pathway.
----
----
----
2
----
----
12
SSTL = site specific target level
GAC - generic assessment criteria
GTV - Groundwater Threshold Value, Statutory Instrument No. 366 of 2016.
----
----
----
----
500
----
----
Volatile Organic CompoundsHuman Health
Commercial GAC
GTV
(mg/L)
Controlled
Waters
SSTL
MDL
----
----
----
----
----
1
----
1
----
----
----
10
IGV
(mg/L)
1
0.1
----
10
10
----
30----
----
----
----
----
----
10
----
3
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
Nov-98 Nov-98 Jan-99 Dec-02 Dec-05 Dec-06 Dec-07 Dec-08 Jul-11 Mar-13 Aug-14 Jun-15 Nov-16 Jun-17 Jun-18
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - 9 - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
619 148 163 223 2,111 254 76 128 46 44 38 40 24 732 49
- - - - - - 20 7 15 12 13 13 7 - 13
- - - - - - - - - NA NA NA NA NA NA
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- 8 7 8 - 8 - 7 - - - - - - -
- - 2 - - - 5 - 5 5 4 5 - - 6
- 3 3 - 31 5 3 - 2 - - - - 34 -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- 2 2 2 62 - 3 - 3 3 - - - - 3
41 47 41 44 11 39 74 29 43 15 - - 24 - 19
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
19 11 9 11 14 8 12 9 12 7 5 - 3 20 5
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
39 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - 3 - - - - 3 - - - - - 5
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
IGV - EPA Interim Guideline Value for the protection of groundwater
Indicates result above IGV
*IGV is for the sum of dichloroethenes
**Two IGVs are given for trichloroethene
***Two IGVs are given for tetrachloroethene
****IGV is for the sum of xylenes
*****IGV is for the sum of trichlorobenzenes
Down Gradient Deep Groundwater Monitoring Well
504
AECOM Ireland Limited \\eu.aecomnet.com\EMIA\UKI\IEORK1\Jobs\PR-289971_PPI_GWM_2018\500_Deliverables\PR-289971-ACM-RP-EN-001\PPI Tables 2018
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:57
Updated by: EOH
Checked by: BMCTable 4 - Bedrock Groundwater Volatile Organic Compound Results (mg/L) 2018 - PPI Adhesive Products - Waterford
Jun-18
Dichlorodifluoromethane <2 ---- ---- 190
MTBE <0.1 10 ---- SatChloromethane <3 ---- ---- 14800Vinyl Chloride <0.1 0.375 2.25 741Bromomethane <1 ---- ---- 7Chloroethane <3 ---- ---- SatTrichlorofluoromethane <3 ---- ---- 2300001,1-Dichloroethene <3 ---- 30 * ---- 210000Carbon Disulphide NA ---- ---- 67200Dichloromethane <5 15 ---- 20trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <3 0.375 30 * ---- 1970001,1-Dichloroethane <3 ---- ---- 3200000cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <3 0.375 30 * 130 1470002,2-Dichloropropane <1 ---- ---- No criteriaBromochloromethane <2 ---- ---- 83Chloroform <2 ---- ---- 9910001,1,1-Trichloroethane <2 ---- ---- Sat1,1-Dichloropropene <3 ---- ---- No criteriaCarbon Tetrachloride <2 ---- ---- No criteria1,2-Dichloroethane <2 2.25 ---- 7130Benzene <0.5 0.75 ---- 243000Trichloroethene <3 7.5 10 ,70** 48.6 65300
1,2-Dichloropropane <2 ---- ---- 31300Dibromomethane <3 ---- ---- 7.9Bromodichloromethane <2 ---- ---- 15100cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <2 ---- ---- No criteriaToluene <5 525 ---- Sattrans-1,3-Dichloropropene <2 ---- ---- No criteria1,1,2-Trichloroethane <2 ---- ---- 388000Tetrachloroethene <3 7.5 10 ,40*** ---- Sat1,3-Dichloropropane <2 ---- ---- 0.1Dibromochloromethane <2 ---- ---- Sat1,2-Dibromoethane <2 ---- ---- 0.1Chlorobenzene <2 ---- ---- 1910001,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <2 ---- ---- 257000Ethyl Benzene <1 ---- ---- Satm,p-Xylene <2 ---- 10 **** ---- Sato-Xylene <1 ---- 10 **** ---- SatStyrene <2 ---- ---- SatBromoform <2 ---- ---- 2340000Isopropylbenzene <3 ---- ---- Sat1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <4 ---- ---- 843000Bromobenzene <2 ---- ---- 1980001,2,3-Trichloropropane <3 ---- ---- 0.00065Propylbenzene <3 ---- ---- Sat2-Chlorotoluene <3 ---- ---- Sat1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <3 ---- ---- 322004-Chlorotoluene <3 ---- ---- Sattert-Butylbenzene <3 ---- ---- No criteria1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <3 ---- ---- 30300sec-Butylbenzene <3 ---- ---- Satp-Isopropyltoluene <3 ---- ---- Sat1,3-Dichlorobenzene <3 ---- ---- 354001,4-Dichlorobenzene <3 ---- ---- Satn-Butylbenzene <3 ---- ---- Sat1,2-Dichlorobenzene <3 ---- ---- Sat1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane <2 ---- ---- 0.11,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <3 ---- 0.4 ***** ---- SatHexachlorobutadiene <3 ---- ---- 3840Naphthalene <2 ---- ---- Sat
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <3 ---- 0.4 ***** ---- Sat
Notes:
N/A - not analysed
Underline - indicates result above GTV- Indicates result below method detection limit, not specified.
Sat - indicates no GAC due to calculated saturation of the vapour pathway.
----
----
----
2
----
----
12
SSTL = site specific target level
GAC - generic assessment criteria
GTV - Groundwater Threshold Value, Statutory Instrument No. 366 of 2016.
----
----
----
----
500
----
----
Volatile Organic CompoundsHuman Health
Commercial GAC
GTV
(mg/L)
Controlled
Waters
SSTL
MDL
----
----
----
----
----
1
----
1
----
----
----
10
IGV
(mg/L)
1
0.1
----
10
10
----
30----
----
----
----
----
----
10
----
3
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
Nov-98 Nov-98 Jan-99 Dec-02 Dec-05 Dec-06 Dec-07 Jun-11 Mar-13 Aug-14 Jun-15 Sep-16 Jun-17 Jun-18
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
306 15 12 17 154 91 1,400 2,353 373 1,825 1,016 930 591 359
- - - - - - <10 - 3 - 3 - - 3
- - - - - - <10 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
- 5 5 4 - - <10 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
20 78 57 46 52 32 89 47 61 49 47 37 30 24
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
- 2 2 - - - 15 11 6 10 9 6 7 6
18 21 22 17 22 18 13 9 7 - - - - 6
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
19 32 27 24 22 14 40 18 19 18 19 13 17 13
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
- - 2 - - - <10 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <20 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
- - - - - - <10 - - - - - - -
****IGV is for the sum of xylenes
*****IGV is for the sum of trichlorobenzenes
IGV - EPA Interim Guideline Value for the protection of groundwater
Indicates result above IGV
*IGV is for the sum of dichloroethenes
**Two IGVs are given for trichloroethene
***Two IGVs are given for tetrachloroethene
505
Down Gradient Deep Groundwater Monitoring Well
AECOM Ireland Limited \\eu.aecomnet.com\EMIA\UKI\IEORK1\Jobs\PR-289971_PPI_GWM_2018\500_Deliverables\PR-289971-ACM-RP-EN-001\PPI Tables 2018
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:57
Prepared by: BMC
Checked by: EOHTable 5 - Redox and Biodegradation Indicator Results (mg/L) 2018 -
PPI Adhesive Products - Waterford
MW16 MW17 MW19 MW20 PPI Well 404 501 504 505
Sulphate 0.05 200 3 25 35 1 17 25 19 21 24
Chloride 0.3 30 24 -187.5 25 17 43 28 22 20 26 25 28
Nitrate (as NO3) 0.2 200 - 7 13 - 9 16 12 5 14
Nitrite (as NO2) 0.02 50 - - - - - - - - -
Total Alkalinity as CaCO3 1 nac 288 184 134 266 180 158 130 214 192
Iron 0.02 0.20 14.8 - - 2.74 - - 0.073 0.150 -
Manganese 0.002 0.05 14.2 - 0.002 8.56 0.003 - - 0.037 -
Note:
MDL: Method Detection Limit -: Indicates result below MDL
IGV: Interim Guideline Value Bold Indicates result above IGV
GTV: Groundwater Threshold Value, Statutory Instrument No. 366 of 2016. Underline - indicates result above GTV
"----:IGV/GTV Not Defined nac: no abnormal change
Groundwater Monitoring Well
Note 1: IGV states no abnormal change for Alkalinity and give a limit
for Hardness (as CaCO3) of 200 mg/L
Parameter MDL IGV GTV
----
----
----
0.375
37.5
187.5
AECOM Ireland Limited \\eu.aecomnet.com\EMIA\UKI\IEORK1\Jobs\PR-289971_PPI_GWM_2018\500_Deliverables\PR-289971-ACM-RP-EN-001\PPI Tables 2018
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:57
PPI Groundwater Monitoring 2018
Project reference: PR-289971-ACM-EN-RP-001
Prepared for: PPI Adhesive Products Limited
AECOM
Appendix C Laboratory Certificate
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:57
Unit 3 Deeside Point
Zone 3
Deeside Industrial Park
Deeside
AECOM
Attention :
Date :
Your reference :
Our reference :
Location :
Date samples received :
Status :
Issue :
Registered Address : Exova (UK) Ltd, Lochend Industrial Estate, Newbridge, Midlothian, EH28 8PL
Compiled By:
Test Report 18/9702 Batch 1
Edel O'Hannelly
27th June, 2018
1
Simon Gomery BSc
PR289971
Exova Jones Environmental
CH5 2UA
Tel: +44 (0) 1244 833780
Fax: +44 (0) 1244 833781
Nine samples were received for analysis on 21st June, 2018 of which nine were scheduled for analysis. Please find attached our Test Report which
should be read with notes at the end of the report and should include all sections if reproduced. Interpretations and opinions are outside the scope of
any accreditation, and all results relate only to samples supplied.
All analysis is carried out on as received samples and reported on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. Results are not surrogate corrected.
1st Floor, Montrose House
Carrigaline Road
Douglas
Cork
Ireland
21st June, 2018
Final report
Project Manager
QF-PM 3.1.1 v16Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced
All solid results are expressed on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. 1 of 7
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:57
Client Name: Report : Liquid
Reference:
Location:
Contact: Liquids/products: V=40ml vial, G=glass bottle, P=plastic bottle
JE Job No.: 18/9702 H=H2SO4, Z=ZnAc, N=NaOH, HN=HN03
J E Sample No. 1-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21-25 26-29 30-33 34-37 38-41
Sample ID MW16 MW17 MW19 MW20 PPI WELL 404 501 504 505
Depth
COC No / misc
Containers V HN P G V HN P G V HN P G V HN P G V HN P G V HN P V HN P V HN P V HN P
Sample Date 18/06/2018 18/06/2018 18/06/2018 18/06/2018 18/06/2018 18/06/2018 18/06/2018 18/06/2018 18/06/2018
Sample Type Ground Water Ground Water Ground Water Ground Water Ground Water Ground Water Ground Water Ground Water Ground Water
Batch Number 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Date of Receipt 21/06/2018 21/06/2018 21/06/2018 21/06/2018 21/06/2018 21/06/2018 21/06/2018 21/06/2018 21/06/2018
Total Dissolved Iron # 14830AA <20 <20 2743 <20 <20 73 150 <20 <20 ug/l TM30/PM14
Dissolved Manganese # 14180AA <2 2 8564 3 <2 <2 37 <2 <2 ug/l TM30/PM14
Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether # <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 - - - - <0.1 ug/l TM15/PM10
Benzene # <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - - - - <0.5 ug/l TM15/PM10
Toluene # <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 - - - - <5 ug/l TM15/PM10
Ethylbenzene # <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 - - - - <1 ug/l TM15/PM10
p/m-Xylene # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 - - - - <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
o-Xylene # 2 <1 <1 <1 <1 - - - - <1 ug/l TM15/PM10
Surrogate Recovery Toluene D8 91 91 92 91 93 - - - - <0 % TM15/PM10
Surrogate Recovery 4-Bromofluorobenzene 96 105 107 105 105 - - - - <0 % TM15/PM10
TPH CWG
Aliphatics
>C5-C6 # <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 - - - - <10 ug/l TM36/PM12
>C6-C8 # 31 13 <10 <10 406 - - - - <10 ug/l TM36/PM12
>C8-C10 # 65 <10 <10 67 <10 - - - - <10 ug/l TM36/PM12
>C10-C12 # 41263 <5 <5 20201 507 - - - - <5 ug/l TM5/PM16/PM30
>C12-C16 # 128420 <10 <10 48240 1910 - - - - <10 ug/l TM5/PM16/PM30
>C16-C21 # 124940 <10 <10 45590 1820 - - - - <10 ug/l TM5/PM16/PM30
>C21-C35 # 61480 <10 <10 26970 930 - - - - <10 ug/l TM5/PM16/PM30
Total aliphatics C5-35 # 356199 13 <10 141068 5573 - - - - <10 ug/l TM5/TM36/PM12/PM16/PM30
Aromatics
>C5-EC7 # <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 - - - - <10 ug/l TM36/PM12
>EC7-EC8 # <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 - - - - <10 ug/l TM36/PM12
>EC8-EC10 # <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 - - - - <10 ug/l TM36/PM12
>EC10-EC12 # 6175 <5 <5 1679 51 - - - - <5 ug/l TM5/PM16/PM30
>EC12-EC16 # 40650 <10 <10 12540 640 - - - - <10 ug/l TM5/PM16/PM30
>EC16-EC21 # 59530 <10 <10 22710 1140 - - - - <10 ug/l TM5/PM16/PM30
>EC21-EC35 # 38440 <10 <10 16560 740 - - - - <10 ug/l TM5/PM16/PM30
Total aromatics C5-35 # 144795 <10 <10 53489 2571 - - - - <10 ug/l TM5/TM36/PM12/PM16/PM30
Total aliphatics and aromatics(C5-35) # 500994 13 <10 194557 8144 - - - - <10 ug/l TM5/TM36/PM12/PM16/PM30
Sulphate as SO4 # 3.2 24.5 34.7 1.1 16.8 24.6 19.2 20.6 23.9 <0.5 mg/l TM38/PM0
Chloride # 25.2 17.2 43.3 27.6 22.2 19.5 26.1 24.6 27.8 <0.3 mg/l TM38/PM0
Nitrate as NO3 # <0.2 7.2 12.5 <0.2 8.5 15.5 12.0 5.4 13.8 <0.2 mg/l TM38/PM0
Nitrite as NO2 # <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 mg/l TM38/PM0
Total Alkalinity as CaCO3 # 288 184 134 266 180 158 130 214 192 <1 mg/l TM75/PM0
Edel O'Hannelly
Please see attached notes for all
abbreviations and acronyms
LOD/LOR UnitsMethod
No.
Exova Jones Environmental
AECOM
PR289971
QF-PM 3.1.2 v11Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced
All solid results are expressed on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. 2 of 7
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:57
Client Name: VOC Report : Liquid
Reference:
Location:
Contact:
JE Job No.: 18/9702
J E Sample No. 1-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21-25 26-29 30-33 34-37 38-41
Sample ID MW16 MW17 MW19 MW20 PPI WELL 404 501 504 505
Depth
COC No / misc
Containers V HN P G V HN P G V HN P G V HN P G V HN P G V HN P V HN P V HN P V HN P
Sample Date 18/06/2018 18/06/2018 18/06/2018 18/06/2018 18/06/2018 18/06/2018 18/06/2018 18/06/2018 18/06/2018
Sample Type Ground Water Ground Water Ground Water Ground Water Ground Water Ground Water Ground Water Ground Water Ground Water
Batch Number 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Date of Receipt 21/06/2018 21/06/2018 21/06/2018 21/06/2018 21/06/2018 21/06/2018 21/06/2018 21/06/2018 21/06/2018
VOC MS
Dichlorodifluoromethane <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether # <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 ug/l TM15/PM10
Chloromethane # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
Vinyl Chloride # 3.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.7 26.8 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 ug/l TM15/PM10
Bromomethane <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 ug/l TM15/PM10
Chloroethane # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
Trichlorofluoromethane # <3 4 <3 <3 4 1209AA 104 49 359 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,1-Dichloroethene (1,1 DCE) # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 10 13 3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
Dichloromethane (DCM) # <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 ug/l TM15/PM10
trans-1-2-Dichloroethene # <3 <3 <3 <3 4 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,1-Dichloroethane # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 8 6 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
cis-1-2-Dichloroethene # 5 16 <3 <3 802AA 4 <3 <3 24 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
2,2-Dichloropropane <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 ug/l TM15/PM10
Bromochloromethane # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Chloroform # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 6 7 3 6 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,1,1-Trichloroethane # <2 <2 <2 <2 4 5 22 19 6 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,1-Dichloropropene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
Carbon tetrachloride # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,2-Dichloroethane # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Benzene # <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 ug/l TM15/PM10
Trichloroethene (TCE) # <3 9 <3 <3 79 4 <3 5 13 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,2-Dichloropropane # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Dibromomethane # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
Bromodichloromethane # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
cis-1-3-Dichloropropene <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Toluene # <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 ug/l TM15/PM10
trans-1-3-Dichloropropene <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,1,2-Trichloroethane # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Tetrachloroethene (PCE) # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 4 5 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,3-Dichloropropane # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Dibromochloromethane # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,2-Dibromoethane # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Chlorobenzene # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Ethylbenzene # <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 ug/l TM15/PM10
p/m-Xylene # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
o-Xylene # 2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 ug/l TM15/PM10
Styrene <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Bromoform # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
Isopropylbenzene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 <4 ug/l TM15/PM10
Bromobenzene # <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,2,3-Trichloropropane # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
Propylbenzene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
2-Chlorotoluene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
4-Chlorotoluene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
tert-Butylbenzene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
sec-Butylbenzene # 3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
4-Isopropyltoluene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,3-Dichlorobenzene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,4-Dichlorobenzene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
n-Butylbenzene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,2-Dichlorobenzene # <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
Hexachlorobutadiene <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
Naphthalene 6 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 ug/l TM15/PM10
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 ug/l TM15/PM10
Surrogate Recovery Toluene D8 91 91 92 91 93 96 94 92 97 <0 % TM15/PM10
Surrogate Recovery 4-Bromofluorobenzene 96 105 107 105 105 108 107 104 110 <0 % TM15/PM10
Edel O'Hannelly
Please see attached notes for all
abbreviations and acronyms
LOD/LOR UnitsMethod
No.
Exova Jones Environmental
AECOM
PR289971
QF-PM 3.1.4 v11Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced
All solid results are expressed on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. 3 of 7
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:57
Notification of Deviating Samples
Matrix : Liquid
J E
Job
No.
Batch Depth J E Sample
No.Analysis Reason
18/9702 1 26-29 VOC Analysis taken from a previously sampled container.
Please note that only samples that are deviating are mentioned in this report. If no samples are listed it is because none were deviating.
Only analyses which are accredited are recorded as deviating if set criteria are not met.
Location:
Contact: Edel O'Hannelly
Sample ID
404
Exova Jones Environmental
Client Name: AECOM
Reference: PR289971
QF-PM 3.1.11 v3 Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced 4 of 7
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:57
JE Job No.:
SOILS
DEVIATING SAMPLES
SURROGATES
DILUTIONS
BLANKS
NOTE
Where an MCERTS report has been requested, you will be notified within 48 hours of any samples that have been identified as being outside our
MCERTS scope. As validation has been performed on clay, sand and loam, only samples that are predominantly these matrices, or combinations
of them will be within our MCERTS scope. If samples are not one of a combination of the above matrices they will not be marked as MCERTS
accredited.
Negative Neutralization Potential (NP) values are obtained when the volume of NaOH (0.1N) titrated (pH 8.3) is greater than the volume of HCl (1N)
to reduce the pH of the sample to 2.0 - 2.5. Any negative NP values are corrected to 0.
Where a CEN 10:1 ZERO Headspace VOC test has been carried out, a 10:1 ratio of water to wet (as received) soil has been used.
All samples will be discarded one month after the date of reporting, unless we are instructed to the contrary.
% Asbestos in Asbestos Containing Materials (ACMs) is determined by reference to HSG 264 The Survey Guide - Appendix 2 : ACMs in buildings
listed in order of ease of fibre release.
Data is only reported if the laboratory is confident that the data is a true reflection of the samples analysed. Data is only reported as accredited when
all the requirements of our Quality System have been met. In certain circumstances where all the requirements of the Quality System have not been
met, for instance if the associated AQC has failed, the reason is fully investigated and documented. The sample data is then evaluated alongside
the other quality control checks performed during analysis to determine its suitability. Following this evaluation, provided the sample results have not
been effected, the data is reported but accreditation is removed. It is a UKAS requirement for data not reported as accredited to be considered
indicative only, but this does not mean the data is not valid.
Where possible, and if requested, samples will be re-extracted and a revised report issued with accredited results. Please do not hesitate to contact
the laboratory if further details are required of the circumstances which have led to the removal of accreditation.
Where Mineral Oil or Fats, Oils and Grease is quoted, this refers to Total Aliphatics C10-C40.
Please note we are not a UK Drinking Water Inspectorate (DWI) Approved Laboratory .
REPORTS FROM THE SOUTH AFRICA LABORATORY
Any method number not prefixed with SA has been undertaken in our UK laboratory unless reported as subcontracted.
If you have not already done so, please send us a purchase order if this is required by your company.
The calculation of Pyrite content assumes that all oxidisable sulphides present in the sample are pyrite. This may not be the case. The calculation
may be an overesitimate when other sulphides such as Barite (Barium Sulphate) are present.
Where analytes have been found in the blank, the sample will be treated in accordance with our laboratory procedure for dealing with contaminated
blanks.
ISO17025 accreditation applies to surface water and groundwater and usually one other matrix which is analysis specific, any other liquids are
outside our scope of accreditation.
As surface waters require different sample preparation to groundwaters the laboratory must be informed of the water type when submitting samples.
Where appropriate please make sure that our detection limits are suitable for your needs, if they are not, please notify us immediately.
Samples must be received in a condition appropriate to the requested analyses. All samples should be submitted to the laboratory in suitable
containers with sufficient ice packs to sustain an appropriate temperature for the requested analysis. If this is not the case you will be informed and
any test results that may be compromised highlighted on your deviating samples report.
NOTES TO ACCOMPANY ALL SCHEDULES AND REPORTS
Please note we are only MCERTS accredited (UK soils only) for sand, loam and clay and any other matrix is outside our scope of accreditation.
Where Mineral Oil or Fats, Oils and Grease is quoted, this refers to Total Aliphatics C10-C40.
18/9702
WATERS
It is assumed that you have taken representative samples on site and require analysis on a representative subsample. Stones will generally be
included unless we are requested to remove them.
All analysis is reported on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. Results are not surrogate corrected. Samples are dried at 35°C ±5°C unless
otherwise stated. Moisture content for CEN Leachate tests are dried at 105°C ±5°C.
Surrogate compounds are added during the preparation process to monitor recovery of analytes. However low recovery in soils is often due to peat,
clay or other organic rich matrices. For waters this can be due to oxidants, surfactants, organic rich sediments or remediation fluids. Acceptable
limits for most organic methods are 70 - 130% and for VOCs are 50 - 150%. When surrogate recoveries are outside the performance criteria but
the associated AQC passes this is assumed to be due to matrix effect. Results are not surrogate corrected.
A dilution suffix indicates a dilution has been performed and the reported result takes this into account. No further calculation is required.
QF-PM 3.1.9 v34Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced
All solid results are expressed on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. 5 of 7
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:57
JE Job No.:
#
SA
B
DR
M
NA
NAD
ND
NDP
SS
SV
W
+
++
*
AD
CO
LOD/LOR
ME
NFD
BS
LB
N
TB
OC
AA x5 Dilution
Outside Calibration Range
No Fibres Detected
Result outside calibration range, results should be considered as indicative only and are not accredited.
Results expressed on as received basis.
Surrogate recovery outside performance criteria. This may be due to a matrix effect.
AQC Sample
Suspected carry over
Trip Blank Sample
Blank Sample
Client Sample
AQC failure, accreditation has been removed from this result, if appropriate, see 'Note' on previous page.
Calibrated against a single substance
Indicates analyte found in associated method blank.
ABBREVIATIONS and ACRONYMS USED
Matrix Effect
No Asbestos Detected.
Limit of Detection (Limit of Reporting) in line with ISO 17025 and MCERTS
No Determination Possible
None Detected (usually refers to VOC and/SVOC TICs).
Samples are dried at 35°C ±5°C
Analysis subcontracted to an Exova Jones Environmental approved laboratory.
Not applicable
ISO17025 (UKAS Ref No. 4225) accredited - UK.
Dilution required.
ISO17025 (SANAS Ref No.T0729) accredited - South Africa.
MCERTS accredited.
18/9702
QF-PM 3.1.9 v34Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced
All solid results are expressed on a dry weight basis unless stated otherwise. 6 of 7
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:57
JE Job No: 18/9702
Test Method No. Description
Prep Method
No. (if
appropriate)
Description
ISO
17025
(UKAS/S
ANAS)
MCERTS
(UK soils
only)
Analysis done
on As Received
(AR) or Dried
(AD)
Reported on
dry weight
basis
TM5Modified USEPA 8015B method for the determination of solvent Extractable Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (EPH) with carbon banding within the range C8-C40 GC-FID. PM16/PM30
Fractionation into aliphatic and aromatic fractions using a Rapid Trace SPE/Water
samples are extracted with solvent using a magnetic stirrer to create a vortex.Yes
TM5/TM36 please refer to TM5 and TM36 for method details PM12/PM16/PM30 please refer to PM16/PM30 and PM12 for method details Yes
TM15Modified USEPA 8260. Quantitative Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds
(VOCs) by Headspace GC-MS.PM10
Modified US EPA method 5021. Preparation of solid and liquid samples for GC
headspace analysis.
TM15Modified USEPA 8260. Quantitative Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds
(VOCs) by Headspace GC-MS.PM10
Modified US EPA method 5021. Preparation of solid and liquid samples for GC
headspace analysis. Yes
TM30
Determination of Trace Metal elements by ICP-OES (Inductively Coupled Plasma -
Optical Emission Spectrometry). Modified US EPA Method 200.7, 6010B and BS EN ISO
11885 2009
PM14Analysis of waters and leachates for metals by ICP OES/ICP MS. Samples are filtered for
dissolved metals and acidified if required.Yes
TM36Modified US EPA method 8015B. Determination of Gasoline Range Organics (GRO) in
the carbon chain range of C4-12 by headspace GC-FID. PM12
Modified US EPA method 5021. Preparation of solid and liquid samples for GC
headspace analysis.Yes
TM38Soluble Ion analysis using the Thermo Aquakem Photometric Automatic Analyser.
Modified US EPA methods 325.2, 375.4, 365.2, 353.1, 354.1PM0 No preparation is required. Yes
TM75Modified US EPA method 310.1. Determination of Alkalinity by Metrohm automated
titration analyser.PM0 No preparation is required. Yes
Exova Jones Environmental Method Code Appendix
QF-PM 3.1.10 v14 Please include all sections of this report if it is reproduced 7 of 7
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:57
PPI Groundwater Monitoring 2018
Project reference: PR-289971-ACM-EN-RP-001
Prepared for: PPI Adhesive Products Limited
AECOM
Brendan McCarthy
Environmental Scientist
T: 021 4365006
M: 087 1872998
AECOM Ireland Limited
1st Floor Montrose House
Carrigaline Road
Douglas
Cork
T: 021 436 5006
aecom.com
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 23-10-2018:03:47:57
Top Related