Download - Potential Difference MAGNA International ReGenX & BiTT Presentation

Potential +/- Difference Inc.

Regenerative Acceleration Generator Technology

Demonstration

University of Ottawa Lab

Demo Test # 1Conventional Generator vs.


The Regenerative Acceleration Generator is very similar to any conventional generator but it also employs extra high

voltage coils to counteract and reverse the effects of armature reaction (or Lenz’s Law) inside the generator.

Demo Test # 1 Conventional Generator vs.


• When the Regenerative Acceleration Generator delivers power to the same load (light bulb) NOW the generator causes the motor to accelerate.

• Now the motor is consuming the least power while the generator is delivering the maximum power.

• Rotor speed is maximum at 3500 RPM.

• When a conventional generator delivers power to a load (light bulb) the generator causes the motor (prime mover) to decelerate.

• In the above photo the motor is consuming the maximum power but delivering virtually no power.

• Rotor speed is only 100 RPM.

Demo Test # 1 Conventional Generator vs.


• INPUT POWER REDUCTION = 41%

• OUTPUT POWER INCREASE = 373%

• The Regenerative Acceleration Generator has the proven ability to increase generator output energy by more than 373% over a conventional generator while at the same time decreasing motor input energy by 41%.

Demo Test # 2Regenerative Acceleration Generator Optimization

Further Regenerative Acceleration Generator developments include the optimization of the high voltage coils to deliver increased generator output

power with system acceleration and the elimination of the high current coils.

Demo Test # 2 Regenerative Acceleration Generator Optimization

• NO LOAD CONDITION

• At full speed and with no load on the generator the system’s steady state speed is 3433 RPM.

• The prime mover is consuming 166 Watts.

• The generator is turned off and delivering 0 Watts.

Demo Test # 2 Regenerative Acceleration Generator Optimization

• ON LOAD CONDITION

• Now the generator is turned on, delivering 31 Watts to the load (light bulbs).

• The generator has accelerated the motor 11 RPM up to 3444 RPM from the no load speed of 3433 RPM.

• The motor input power has decreased by 6 Watts down to 160 Watts from the previous 166 Watt no load condition.

• Currently only two coils are employed but the rotor can accommodate at least 33.

Demo Test # 3Regenerative Acceleration Generator vs.

Conventional Generator

• Now a conventional generator coil has been added (gold & green coil).

• The conventional generator coil is mounted on the opposite side of the rotor and employs 6 poles (magnets).

• We will compare the conventional generator reaction to loading vs. the regenerative acceleration generator performance.



• NO LOAD CONDITION

• Motor Power = 282 Watts

• Steady State Speed = 3283 RPM



• ON LOAD CONDITION CONVENTIONAL GENERATOR

• Conventional generator delivers 6.4 Watts to the load (light bulb).

• Motor power consumption increases 10 Watts to 293 Watts.

• Speed decreases 21 RPM to 3262 RPM.



• ON LOAD CONDITION CONVENTIONAL GENERATOR and ReGenX GENERATOR

• Both conventional generator and regenerative acceleration generators are now delivering power to their loads.

• Conventional generator delivers 6.4 Watts

• Regenerative acceleration generator delivers 37.4 Watts

• Motor power has decreased 19 Watts down to 274 Watts

• Speed has increased 49 RPM up to 3311 RPM.



• CONVENTIONAL GENERATOR OFF LOAD

• ReGenX GENERATOR ON LOAD.

• Now the conventional generator has been turned off.

• The regenerative acceleration generator output increases to 39 Watts.

• Motor power decreases 15 Watts down to 259 Watts.

• Speed increases to 3334 RPM.



• PERFORMANCE COMPARISON SUMMARY

• Conventional generator on load alone delivers an output 6.35 Watts with a corresponding prime mover power input increase of 4% or 11 Watts.

• Regenerative acceleration generator and conventional generator on load deliver a combined output of 43.8 Watts with a prime mover input reduction of 19 Watts.

• This represents a 589% output power increase with a 6.5% input power decrease.

• Regenerative acceleration generator alone delivers a 498% output power increase over the conventional generator alone with a 11.6% decrease in prime mover input.



PERFORMANCE COMPARISON SUMMARY

Generator Type Output Power Armature Reaction

Input Increase / Decrease

Conventional 6.35 W 11 Watt

Generator Increase

Regenerative 43.8 W 19 Watt

Acceleration Decrease

Generator

Potential +/- Difference Inc. Bi-Toroid Transformer Technology

DemonstrationUniversity of Ottawa Lab

Demo Test # 4Bi-Toroid vs. Conventional Transformer

• Conventional transformer NO LOAD.

• Coil current = 71 mA• Power factor = 0 • Load voltage = 0 volts


• Conventional transformer ON LOAD.• Coil current = 139 mA• Power factor = 1 • Load voltage = 3.6 volts


• Bi-Toroid Transformer NO LOAD.

• Coil current = 130 mA• Power factor = 0 • Load voltage = 0 volts


• Bi-Toroid Transformer ON LOAD.

• Coil current = 130 mA• Power factor = 0 • Load voltage = 1.6 volts


ON LOAD NO LOAD ON LOAD

Conventional Transformer Bi-Toroid Transformer Bi-Toroid Transformer

Power Factor = 1 Power Factor = 0 Power Factor = 0


Primary Coil Current and Power Factor Comparison

Conventional Conventional Bi-Toroid Bi-Toroid

Transformer Transformer Transformer Transformer

NO Load ON Load NO Load ON Load

Current 71 139 130 130

mA

Power 0 1 0 0

Factor


Bi-Toroid Transformer NO LOAD Bi-Toroid Transformer ON LOAD

The above photo-data show the power factor (Pf) of the Bi-Toroidtransformer with an increased 18.5 input voltage.

The power factor is virtually unchanged.


• Although it is hard to believe the above left close up scope shot is the Bi-Toroid NO LOAD and the right is ON LOAD.

• There is a slight 25% increase in primary coil current (100 mA) with the higher input voltage although the power factor is virtually zero.


Conventional Transformer ON LOAD

With an increased 18.5 volt input to the primary coil, the conventional

transformer’s purely resistive load dictates the primary coil’s power

factor of 1 and the primary current quadruples.


• In the conventional transformer, the primary coil delivers flux to the secondary coil via the transformer’s ferromagnetic core.

• A voltage is induced in the secondary coil.

• On no load, the primary coil’s voltage and current are 90 degrees out of phase and only reactive power exists in the primary coil.

• Primary Real Power = 0


• When the secondary coil is placed on load, current flows in the coil.

• This current produces a secondary induced flux (blue) which couples back to the primary coil.

• This secondary flux reduces the primary coil’s impedance (AC resistance) and more source current enters the primary coil.

• The increase in primary current increases the primary flux (red) and this flux increase maintains the voltage across the load.

• The load power factor is transferred back to the primary and now real power is consumed in the primary coil.


• In the Bi-Toroid transformer the primary flux is divided between the two secondary coils – Secondary 1 and Secondary 2.

• Voltages are induced in both secondary coils.

• The primary coil’s voltage and current are 90 degrees out of phase and only reactive power exists in the primary coil.

• Primary Real Power = 0 Watts.


• When the Bi-Toroid transformer is placed on load the secondary induced fluxes DO NOT enter the primary core leg due to its higher reluctance (magnetic resistance).

• Instead Secondary 1’s flux enters Secondary 2 and vise versa and the coils self regulate their own voltages across the loads.

• Real power is delivered to the loads.

• Primary Real Power = 0 Watts.


PERFORMANCE COMPARISON SUMMARY

Transformer Type No Load On Load

Conventional Primary draws Primary draws

Transformer reactive power real power

power factor

mirrors load

Bi-Toroid Primary draws Primary draws

Transformer reactive power reactive power

power factor

ignores load

Potential +/- Difference Inc.

Thane Heins

President and CEO

Potential Difference Inc.

613.795.1602 cell

[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]