Elements of Culture 2
Norms, Sanctions, Values
What are your feelings when you see these graduates hanging around at the beachside park?
Objectives• To gain a deeper understanding of how norms,
sanctions and values maintain behavior within a society.
• Degrees of seriousness: mores vs folkways
• A deeper understanding of societal change.
• Cultural Integration and Variation (part 3)
Preview: Topics of Discussion
• Cultural Norms Formal (Mores) & Informal (Folkways)
• Acceptance of NormsNorms in conflict / exceptions / change
• Sanctions and Rewards
• Values
• Cultural Integration (in part 3)
• Cultural Variation (in part 3)
Norms• Deeply established standards of behavior
maintained by a society.
N. America – Young people make life decisions (study / career path)
Japan – Respect for the elderly.
China – Criticizing the gov’t is rare.
• The intricacies of norms are widely shared and understood by all members of a society.
N. America – People are expected to remain quiet in a theatre.
Therefore an Usher can enforce this and are expected to.
Depends on film and audience though (not in Rocky Horror!)
Serious films and plays this norm is insisted upon.
In N. America, break the quiet norm in this fun Teenage movie it
is doubtful that anyone will say much. Maybe “shhhhh”.
Make noise in this serious, political film with historical significance andstrangers will verbally tell you to adjust you behavior.
Classification of Norms: Formal vs. Informal
1. Formal NormsNorms that have been formally written down and offenders face strict punishment.
Formalized norms in many countries become law and have very precise definitions of what is considered proper and improper behavior.
ex. Guidelines for meeting a Major at university and rules for card games are other examples of formalized norms. They are written down with precise regulations.
Classification of Norms: Formal vs. Informal
2. Informal NormsGenerally understood norms, but not precisely recorded.
Standards of proper dressTaboo subject matterAttitude towards being late
Deviating from these norms will not get you thrown in jail, but may lead a to a bad reputation or in being talked about by others.
Social Norms & Impression Management
Classification of Norms: Mores vs. Folkways
3. Mores
Mores are norms that are regarded as being highly necessary to the well being of the overall society.
They are the most cherished principles of a people. They demand obedience and breaking them will result in severe penalties.
murder, treason, theft, fraud, corruption, abuse
Mores are most likely to be formalized and become laws.
Classification of Norms: Mores vs. Folkways
4. Folkways
Norms that govern everyday behavior amongst members of a society. They shape daily life of a culture's people.
Japan: ‘Meishi’ is central to the introduction process and essential in business. Recipient is expected to take time to examine the info and make a comment proves this examination has occurred. Given out even in social situations
A breach – stuffing it in the pocket quickly, or not concluding with ‘meishi’ is insulting.
Folkways are synonymous with behavior etiquette
Meishi exchange in Japan. Very important for foreigners engaged in international business.
Must take time to look – and make comment.
Folkways: reinforcing patterns of behavior
Many societies have and use folkways to reinforce patterns of dominance: male dominance or dominance of a social class.
In traditional Buddhist regions of South East Asia, for example,
Women do not sleep above men on sleeper trains
Women are not on higher hospital floors than men
On clothe lines, women's clothes are hung lower than men’s.
(Bulle, 1987)
The darker brown countries are likely to have Folkwaysthat reinforce male dominance.
Countries of light shade will have folkways and mores that facilitate gender equality. In N.A., they do not indicate gender (or
any person details) on their CVs and hiring, or firing cannot be based on gender (or race) or heavy sanctions are enforced.
Acceptance of Norms: weak enforcement
Norms (mores & folkways) are not followed in all situations, nor by all members of a society. Some evade a norm because they know it is weakly enforced.
Ex. In the N.A. teen drinking is a major social issue.
The pressure from a peer group to
conform is far
outweighed by the
insignificant sanction
if caught.
Can you think of a formal norm (a More) thatis evaded in this region daily because we all
know that enforcement is minimal?
Illegal parking. It should receive a fine.
It is against the law. So, it is a more, not a norm.
Acceptance of Norms: conflict
Norms are often violated when they conflict.
Situation: You hear a screams of panic coming from you neighbors' flat. Someone is being assaulted.
Norm #1 – The norm of privacy and minding one’s own business.
Norm #2 – Assisting a victim of violence by intervening or calling the police.
What would you do? Either way you are evading one norm and
accepting the other.
Acceptance of Norms: exceptions
Regardless of a norm’s enforcement, sanctions or presence of conflict there can be an acceptable exception.
This means under differing circumstances, the same action can make someone a hero or a villain. In clip – is 69 yr old Herlan McQuearry a hero or a villain for murdering someone?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KfQc8-NyXZw&feature=related
Acceptance of Norms: widely accepted
• Some norms are so widely accepted that there is no need to enforce them or reinforce them.
The best example of this is - Cannibalism
Unless one is mentally deranged, or part of an extremely exotic Cult, one is not going to eat people. There is no need to tell people not to do this as this sins so widely accepted.
Norms: Acceptance of Change
A culture’s Norms may change as societal conditions change, such as with,
Political situations, Economic climate, Social conditions
The modern feminist movement in the West is a good
example of social change that has led to a change in cultural norms that reinforce increased gender equality.
Norms: Acceptance of Change
As support for a culture’s traditional norms
weakens, people start to feel free to violate them
and when identified as doing so, these people are
less likely to receive serious negative sanctions,
which in turn creates a catch 22 (a snowball
effect), or in other words, momentum for change.
A Norm in Change: British ColumbiaIn Vancouver Canada judges no longer allow social marijuana
usage cases in their court rooms, police no longer feel it is worth the paper work and the general public does not view
social use as an issue that requires stiff negative sanctions, but they demand stiffer sanctions on drinking and
driving.
Vancouver Marijuana
Cafe
Vancouver Marijuanaprotest against sanctions
Use in public is not a rare sight as sanctions are so insignificant.
Sanctions: Negative Penalties for your conduct regarding a social norm
Sanctions are what happens when people are detected of violating a culture’s shared norms. Such penalties as:
Fines
Threats
Imprisonment
Stares of Contempt
Sanctions: Positive (Rewards) Rewards for conforming to a social norm
The label ‘sanction’ has highly negative connotations and therefore positive sanctions has its own word – rewards
Rewards for being detected of conforming to a social norm may include:
A pay raise
A promotion
A medal or an award
Words of praise
A pat on the back
Sanction: Detection
Sanctions must be detected, or observed by someone with the
power to provide the
sanction – or it will
not happen.
Sanction and Norms: a connection
Norm infraction: You show up to a job interview in jeans
Sanction: You do not get the job. (and a funny look)
Norm infraction: You don’t put coins in your parking meter.
Sanction: You get a parking ticket (fine).
The Correlation
Sanctions associated with formal norms (written down / codified) tend to be formalized and informal norms tend to
receive informal sanctions.
Sanctions: improper application
There is (as we all know) the possibility of a person being levied with undeserved penalties and rewards.
Once, in Europe if a women was merely called a witch,
she was burned to death. So many
Were innocent.
Madonna's famous 1986 World Cup ‘Hand of God' Goal was rewarded through being allowed and in helping Argentina win.
Sanctions: Do they reflect Culture?
The United States has the most advanced fire prevention technology and the best trained (and paid) fire fighters, yet this society has the worst fire death rate in the industrialized world. (McMillan, 1995)
How can this be?
Sanctions: Do they reflect Culture?• In the US sanctions on unintentional negligence causing
fire/death is extremely low. ‘Accidents’ get almost nothing in the way of sanctions!
2,000,000 unintentional severe burns per year (US)
5,000 deaths from unintentional fire per year (US)
All ‘accidents’ with little to no sanctions.
• In Japan and Europe, sanctions for unintentional fire-death are severe. Up to life for smoking in bed, for leaving a pan on the stove or for overloading electrical circuits if you cause fire and mortally wound someone.
Why are sanctions so low for such serious cases of negligence ?
Sanctions: Do they reflect Culture?
US (and Western culture) has strong norms surrounding privacy in the home – especially in the US which was founded on liberty and freedom and with high value on private property. Sanctions regarding what is done in the privacy of one’s home seems to be held in high regard even when one's actions in private, (such as smoking in bed) endangers or kills others.
YES! The entire fabric of norms and sanctions in a culture reflects the culture’s values and priorities. The most
cherished values will have the strongest sanctions where less critical values will have light and informal sanctions.
Values
Although we all have our own set of personal goals and ambitions, one’s culture includes a general set
of objectives for its members
Values – collective conceptions for what
is considered good desirable or proper in
a society. As well as what is considered
bad, undesirable or improper.
You may have a goal to get a certain degree, but your culture influences you in your opinion about weather an education s desirable or not.
Values
• Values can be specific
honoring one’s parents, owning a home
• Values can be general
health, democracy, love
• Values influence our behavior and serve as criteria for evaluating the actions of others.
Health – unhealthy, educated - uneducated (etc.)
Norms – Sanctions - Values
There is usually a direct relationship between a culture’s norms, sanctions and their values.
Example
A culture that places high value on marriage
Will have norms and high sanctions on adultery
A culture that places high value on private property
Will have norms and high sanctions against Theft and vandalism
Values: Do they change?
• A culture’s values may change, but tend to remain relatively stable during a person’s lifetime.
• As previously mentioned – a society's non-material culture is difficult to change and change in this area is far slower than with material culture.
• A sway in a culture’s core values can be seen over time, but the change is hard to observe while it is in progress due to the slow pace of change.
Values: making similar societies unique
Lipset (1990) Continental Divide looked into value differences between Canada and the US. – two seeming
very similar societies.
US more religious than Canadians
US more moralistic and conservative towards sex and marriage.
Canada greater concern for older society
Canada favor a stronger role of government
US more suspicious of ‘big’ business (& big gov’t)
These differing values of course lead to differing norms and sanctions
These values differences lead to unique US norms/sanctions regarding gays in the military.
• In 993 Bill Clinton lifted this ban in the US Army to strong opposition both inside and outside the military.
Today only concealed gays can serve – not open
• One year earlier (1992) Canada lifted this ban with national applause and support.
• Out of all the US allies only three have such a ban; Great Britain, Portugal and Greece.
US debate on allowing openly gay men and lesbian women to serve in the military.
Intense US anti-gay military protest
When Denmark's Air Force General (from another
‘Western’ country) was asked about this debate in the US. He
said, “I don’t understand why you
have to debate it….Nobody cares about it”.
(Lancaster, 1992: 14)
Therefore, values shape societies!
In many countries personal profit and owning one’s own property is a core value shaping society.
In Papua New Guinea contribution to public good is more valued than one’s own profit and personal land.
Several people hold different rights to the same piece of land, such as
Dwelling rightsHunting rightsFishing rightsCeremonial rights
Top Related