Quelle: Schlegel, Stand: 31.07.2018
30
68
32
10
32
20
28
47
24
20
29
86
14
80
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
V90-2MWNH 105 m
Vestas
E82-2MWNH 108 mEnercon
E82-2MWNH 138 mEnercon
E82-2MWNH 138 mEnercon
MM92-2MWNH100 mSenvion
V90-2MWNH 125 m
Vestas
V80-2MWNH 67 mVestas
Str
om
ein
sp
eis
un
g in
MW
hStromerträgevergleich WP 2018 - verschiedene Standorte
WP 1 (SN) WP 6 (SN)WP 5 (SN)WP 4 (SN)WP 3 (SN) WP 7 (SN)WP 2 (SN)
Rprim
Rprim - Referenzanlage
(Mittelwert E1-7 = 2.958,6 MWh/a)
Quelle: Schlegel, Stand: 31.07.2018
199,9%
100%
201,8%
163,6%
192,4%
217,6%
216,9%
207,3%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% 140% 160% 180% 200% 220% 240%
Mittelwert - 6 WEA
WP 7 (SN) - V 80-2MW
WP6 (SN) - V90-2MW
WP5 (SN) - MM92-2MW
WP4 (SN) - E82-2MW
WP3 (SN) - E82-2MW
WP2 (SN) - E82-2MW
WP1 (SN) - V90-2MW
Prozentualer Stromertragsvergleich sächsischer WEA 2018
Ref - Referenz - WEA
NH 105m/RD 90m
NH 108m/RD 82m
NH 138m/RD 82m
NH 138m/RD 82m
NH 100m/RD 92m
NH 125m/RD 90m
NH 67m/RD 80m - Ref tv 1-7 = 739,9 h/a
Ø E = 2.958,6 MWh/a Ø tv 1-7 = 1.479,3 h/a
tv 1-7 = 1.534,0 h/a
tv 1-7 = 1.605,1 h/a
tv 1-7 = 1.610,1 h/a
tv 1-7 = 1.423,4 h/a
tv 1-7 = 1.180,7 h/a
tv 1-7 = 1.492,9 h/a
Quelle: Schlegel, Stand: 31.07.2018
3068
2846
2299
2830
2900
2652
2420
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
V90-2MWNH 105 m
Vestas
V90-2MWNH 105 m
Vestas
MM92-2MWNH 80 mREPower
E82-2,3MWNH 138 mEnercon
E82-2,3MWNH 138 mEnercon
MM92-2MWNH 100 mREPower
MM92-2MWNH 100 mREPower
Str
om
ein
sp
eis
un
g in
MW
h
Stromerträgevergleich WP 2018 - verschiedene Standorte
WP 1 (SN) WP 6 (SN)WP 5 (SN)WP 4 (SN)WP 3 (SN) WP 7 (SN)WP 2 (SN)
(Mittelwert E1-7 = 2.716,4 MWh/a)
Quelle: Schlegel, Stand: 31.07.2018
183,6%
163,6%
179,2%
195,9%
191,3%
155,4%
192,3%
207,3%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% 140% 160% 180% 200% 220%
Mittelwert - 7 WEA
WP7 (SN) - MM92-2MW
WP6 (SN) - MM92-2MW
WP5 (SN) - E82-2,3MW
WP4 (SN) - E82-2,3MW
WP3 (SN) - MM92-2MW
WP2 (SN) - V90-2MW
WP1 (SN) - V90-2MW
Prozentualer Stromertragsvergleich sächsischer WEA 2018
NH 105m/RD 90m
NH 105m/RD 90m
NH 80m/RD 92m
NH 138m/RD 82m
NH 138m/RD 82m
NH 100m/RD 92m
Ø E = 2.716,4 MWh/a
tv 1-7 = 1.180,7 h/a
tv 1-7 = 1.293,5 h/a
tv 1-7 = 1.534,0 h/a
tv 1-7 = 1.422,8 h/a
tv 1-7 = 1.121,6 h/a
tv 1-7 = 1.230,6 h/a
tv 1-7 = 1.260,7 h/a
Ø tv 1-7 = 1.289,2 h/a
NH 100m/RD 92m
Quelle: Schlegel, Stand: 31.07.2018
32
20
33
82
33
52
39
46
40
40
41
73
43
23
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
5500
6000
E82-2MWNH 138 mEnercon
E82-2MWNH 138 mEnercon
E82-2,3MWNH 138 mEnercon
3,2M-114NH 93 mRepower
3,2M-114NH 93 mRepower
E101-3MWNH 135 mEnercon
3,2M114NH 143 mSenvion
Str
om
ein
sp
eis
un
g i
n M
Wh
Stromerträgevergleich WP 2018 - verschiedene Standorte
WP 1 (Lö) WP 6 (Er)* WP 5 (SN)WP 4 (SN)WP 3 (Ab) WP 7 (MS) WP 2 (Bo)
* Daten unkorrigiert
(Mittelwert E2MW 1-7 ≈ 3.318,0 MWh/a)
(Mittelwert E3MW 1-7 ≈ 4.120,5 MWh/a)
Quelle: Schlegel, Stand: 31.07 .2018
278,4%
292,1%
282,0%
273,0%
266,6%
226,5%
228,5%
217,6%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%120%140%160%180%200%220%240%260%280%300%320%
Mittelwert - WEA 3MW
WP7 (MS) - 3,2M114
WP6 (Er) - E101-3MW
WP5 (SN) - 3,2M-114
WP4 (SN) - 3,2-M114
WP3 (Ab) - E82-2,3MW
WP2 (Bo) - E82-2MW
WP1 (Lö) - E82-2MW
Prozentualer Stromertragsvergleich sächsischer WEA 2018
NH 138m/RD 82m
NH 138m/RD 82m
NH 138m/RD 82m
NH 93m/RD 114m
NH 93m/RD 114m
NH 143m/RD 114m
Ø tv 1-7 = 1.302,9 h/a
tv 1-7 = 1.691,0 h/a
tv 1-7 = 1.610,1 h/a
tv 1-7 = 1.457,3 h/a
tv 1-7 = 1.233,2 h/a
tv 1-7 = 1.262,4 h/a
Ø E3MW = 4.120,5 MWh/a
NH 135m/RD 101m tv 1-7 = 1.368,3 h/a
tv 1-7 = 1.350,8h/a
Quelle: Schlegel, Stand: 31.07.2018
3946
4040
4173
4323
4225
3633
4172
0500
1000150020002500300035004000450050005500600065007000
3,2M-114NH93 mRepower
3,2M-114NH93 mRepower
E101-3MWNH135 mEnercon
3,2M114NH143 mSenvion
E101-3MWNH135 mEnercon
V112-3MWNH140mVestas
E101-3MWNH135mEnercon
Str
om
ein
sp
eis
ung
in M
Wh
Stromerträgevergleich WP 2018 -verschiedene Standorte
WP 1 SN) WP 6 Har) WP 5 (Erz)WP 4 (MS)WP 3 (Er) WP 7 (SN) WP 2 SN)
(Mittelwert E3MW 1-7 ≈ 4.073,0 MWh/a)
Quelle: Schlegel, Stand: 31.07 .2018
275,2%
281,9%
245,5%
285,5%
292,1%
282,0%
273,0%
266,6%
220% 240% 260% 280% 300%
Mittelwert WEA 1 - 7
WP7 (SN) E101-3MW
WP6 (Har) - V112-3MW
WP5 (Erz) - E101-3MW
WP4 (MS) - 3,2-M114
WP3 (Er) - E101-3MW
WP2 (SN) - 3,2M-114
WP1 (SN) - 3,2M-114
Prozentualer Stromertragsvergleich sächsischer WEA 2018
NH 93m/RD 114m
NH 93m/RD 114m
NH 135m/RD 101m
NH 143m/RD 114m
NH 135m/RD 101m
NH 135m/RD 101m
Ø tv 1-7 = 1.306,4 h/a
tv 1-7 = 1.262,4 h/a
tv 1-7 = 1.233,2 h/a
tv 1-7 = 1.368,3 h/a
tv 1-7 = 1.350,8 h/a
tv 1-7 = 1.385,1 h/a
Ø E3MW = 4.073,0 MWh/a
NH 140m/RD 112m tv 1-7 = 1.181,3 h/a
tv 1-7 = 1.367,9h/a
Quelle: Schlegel, Stand: 31.07.2018
39
13
34
26 38
88
33
42
41
72
40
91
39
80
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
V112-3.3MWNH140mVestas
V112-3.3MWNH140mVestas
V112-3.3MWNH140mVestas
E101-3MWNH135 mEnercon
E101-3MWNH135 mEnercon
E101-3MWNH135mEnercon
V112-3MWNH140mVestas
Str
om
ein
spe
isu
ng
in M
Wh
Stromerträgevergleich WP 2018 -verschiedene Standorte
WP 1 (Lip) WP 6 Mau) WP 5 (MauWP 4 (Str)WP 3 (Lip) WP 7 (SN) WP 2 (Lip)
(Mittelwert E3MW 1-7 ≈ 3.830,3 MWh/a)
Quelle: Schlegel, Stand: 31.07 .2018
258,8%
268,9%
276,4%
281,9%
225,8%
262,7%
231,5%
264,4%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% 140% 160% 180% 200% 220% 240% 260% 280% 300%
Mittelwert WEA 1 - 7
WP7 (SN)V112-3MW
WP6 (SN) - E101-3MW
WP5 (SN) - E101-3MW
WP4 (Str) - E101-3MW
WP3 (Lip) - V112-3.3MW
WP2 (Lip) - V112-3.3MW
WP1 (Lip) - V112-3.3MW
Prozentualer Stromertragsvergleich sächsischer WEA 2018
NH 140m/RD 112m
NH 140m/RD 112m
NH 140m/RD 112m
NH 135m/RD 101m
NH 135m/RD 101m
NH 140m/RD 112m
Ø tv 1-7 = 1.211,8 h/a
tv 1-7 = 1.038,3 h/a
tv 1-7 = 1.185,6 h/a
tv 1-7 = 1.178,0 h/a
tv 1-7 = 1.095,8 h/a
tv 1-7 = 1.367,9 h/a
Ø E3MW = 3.830,3 MWh/a
NH 135m/RD 101m tv 1-7 = 1.341,2 h/a
tv 1-7 = 1.294,3 h/a
Quelle: Schlegel, Stand: 31.07.2018
38
88
41
73
39
46
40
91 44
99
47
38
43
23
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
V112-3.3MWNH140mVestas
E101-3MWNH135mEnercon
3,2M-114NH93mSenvion
E101-3MWNH135 mEnercon
V126-3.3MWNH149mVestas
V126-3.3MWNH137mVestas
3,2M-114NH143mSenvion
Str
om
ein
sp
eis
un
g in
MW
hStromerträgevergleich WP 2018 - verschiedene Standorte
WP 1 (Lip) WP 6 Str) WP 5 (Str)WP 4 (Mau)WP 3 (SN) WP 7 (MaS) WP 2 (Er)
(Mittelwert E3MW 1-7 ≈ 4.236,9 MWh/a)
Quelle: Schlegel, Stand: 31.07.2018
41
73
38
88 43
23 48
43
41
72
49
70
50
87
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
5500
6000
6500
7000
E101-3MWNH135mEnercon
V112-3.3MWNH140mVestas
3.2M-114NH93mSenvion
3.4M114NH143mSenvion
E101-3MWNH135 mEnercon
V126-3.3MWNH137mVestas
V126-3.3MWNH137mVestas
Str
om
ein
sp
eis
un
g in
MW
h
Stromerträgevergleich WP 2018 - verschiedene Standorte
WP 1 (Er) WP 6 Str) WP 5 (Mau)WP 4 MaSa)WP 3 (MaSa) WP 7 (Soh) WP 2 Lip)
(Mittelwert E3MW 1-7 ≈ 4.493,6 MWh/a)
Quelle: Schlegel, August 2018 bearb.
57
44
50
90
59
01
68
24
57
06
68
10
32
20
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 *
Str
om
ein
sp
eis
un
g i
n M
Wh
Stromerträgevergleich 2012 - 2018: E82-2MW/NH138m
Ea max = Maximum → ∆Emax/min ≙ [≈ 34%]
Ea min = Minimum
∆E
* kumulativ
Quelle: Schlegel, August 2018 bearb.
54
17
73
10
69
17
80
47
67
49
83
72
41
73
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018*
Str
om
ein
sp
eis
un
g i
n M
Wh
Stromerträgevergleich 2012 - 2018: E101-3MW/NH135m
Ea max = Maximum → ∆Emax/min ≙ [≈ 24%]
Ea min = Minimum ∆E
Betriebsbeginn: 30.03.2012
* kumulativ
3.0
68
1.4
80
1.5
34
740
0,00
500,00
1.000,00
1.500,00
2.000,00
2.500,00
0,000
500,000
1.000,000
1.500,000
2.000,000
2.500,000
3.000,000
3.500,000
4.000,000
Vestas V90-2MW/NH 105m Vestas V80-2MW/NH67m
Vo
llla
sts
tun
den
ta
in h
/a
Str
om
ein
sp
eis
un
g E
in
MW
h/a
Stromeinspeisung Volllaststunden
Quelle: Schlegel, 31.07.2018 (August 2018 bearbeitet)
Stromertragsvergleich WP «Silberberg» (L) – WP «Naundorf» (TDO) 2018
[+10
7,3%
]
4.8
43
1.4
801.4
37
74
0
0,00
500,00
1.000,00
1.500,00
2.000,00
2.500,00
3.000,00
0,000
500,000
1.000,000
1.500,000
2.000,000
2.500,000
3.000,000
3.500,000
4.000,000
4.500,000
5.000,000
5.500,000
Senvion 3,4M114/NH143m Vestas V80-2MW/NH67m
Vo
llla
sts
tun
den
ta
in h
/a
Str
om
ein
sp
eis
un
g E
in
MW
h/a
Stromeinspeisung Volllaststunden
Quelle: Schlegel, 31.07.2018 (August 2018 bearbeitet)
Stromertragsvergleich WEA 3,4M114 – WEA V80-2MWRef 2018
[+22
7,3%
]
5.0
87
1.4
80
1.5
41
74
0
0,00
500,00
1.000,00
1.500,00
2.000,00
2.500,00
3.000,00
3.500,00
4.000,00
0,000
500,000
1.000,000
1.500,000
2.000,000
2.500,000
3.000,000
3.500,000
4.000,000
4.500,000
5.000,000
5.500,000
6.000,000
6.500,000
Vestas V126-3.3MW/NH137m Vestas V80-2MW/NH67m
Vo
llla
sts
tun
den
ta
in h
/a
Str
om
ein
sp
eis
un
g E
in
MW
h/a
Stromeinspeisung Volllaststunden
Quelle: Schlegel, 31.07.2018 (August 2018 bearbeitet)
Stromertragsvergleich WEA V126-3.3MW – WEA V80-2MWRef 2018
[+24
3,7%
]
48
4
15
7
311
22
6
13
1
10
6
65
742
332
516
424
321
216
176
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
WP-Stromerträgevergleich 2018
Referenz-WEA V80-2MW (P = 2 MW, NH = 67 m, RD = 80 m); (tv = 739,9 h/a)
WEA Ø 8xV90-2MW (P = 2,0 MW, NH = 105 m, RD = 90 m); (tv = 1361,1 h/a)
DE1-7 [WEA Ø 8xV90-NH105m / WEA V80-NH67m] ≙ (+ 83,9%)
Quelle: Schlegel, 17.08. 2018 (bearbeitet)
484
157
311
226
131
106
65
1369
648
896
693
526
410
302
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
WP-Stromerträgevergleich 2018
Referenz-WEA V80-2MW (P = 2 MW, NH = 67 m, RD = 80 m); (tv = 739,9 h/a)
WEA 3.4M114 (P = 3,37 MW, NH = 143 m, RD = 114 m); (tv = 1437,1 h/a)
DE1-7 [WEA 3.4M114-NH143m / WEA V80-NH67m] ≙ (+ 227,3%)
Quelle: Schlegel, 17.08. 2018 (bearbeitet)
Top Related