New GIS-assisted initiatives on Early Warning Early Action and managementof Transboundary Pests (FAW)
Participatory GIS approaches to support Community Level vulnerability assessment for Fisheries and Aquaculture, Ecosystems Approach to Fisheries Management/Aquaculture and Community-based CCA and DRM Planning (FishAdapt Project)
NEW INITIATIVE/PROJECT: PROGRAMMING AND CAPACITY BUILDING SUPPORT TOAGRICULTURE SECTOR PRIORITIES ON EARLY WARNING EARLY ACTION ANDCOMMUNITY-BASED DISASTER RISK MANAGEMENT IN MYANMAR
Identification and stocktaking of EWEA needs, priorities and related data products for agriculture, livestock and fisheries/ aquaculture
Development of an EWEA approach and piloting for priority hazards
- Development of hazard-specific risk monitoring and early warning protocols, which will include the identification/specification of thresholds and triggers for alerts/announcement of anticipated disasters
- Preparation of local Early Action Plans (EAPs) that will contain a menu of Early Actions that are directly linked to thresholds/triggers and anticipated impacts
- Development of procedures/methods for communities to tap financial resources to implement Early Actions once there is a trigger
Design of an EWEA Program that will facilitate the upscaling and institutionalization of EWEA approaches
Mongolia | 1
There is evidence that the intensity and frequency of climate-driven natural disasters and conflicts is increasing. Natural disasters now occur nearly five times as often compared to 40 years ago.
The impact on local economies, on lives and livelihoods, has similarly grown. In some of the worst-hit places, it can seem unrelenting. One crisis will follow another, every time stripping away at the limited assets of poor and vulnerable people, robbing them of their self-reliance and wounding their humanity and dignity.
Globally, expanding needs, competing priorities and limited resources mean that new tools are essential to make interventions as wise and effective as possible, to ensure that the impacts of crises are limited before they can grow into even more costly humanitarian disasters.
Timely support also protects and empowers people the most, giving them the confidence to keep going or to resume their livelihoods. Investing in early action means FAO can help shelter longer-term development gains and increase resilience.
Working with national governments and humanitarian, development and scientific partners, FAO’s Early Warning Early Action approach monitors risk information systems and translates warnings into anticipatory actions. Every quarter, FAO’s Early Warning Early Action report on food security and agriculture ranks risks by their likelihood and potential impact and identifies the best interventions. Then, FAO’s Special Fund for Emergency and Rehabilitation Activities (SFERA), can release money from its early action window. The funds back tailored plans which are rapidly put into place, drawing on FAO’s greatest asset: its technical knowledge and expertise in supporting rural livelihoods.
Early actions are varied and flexible, ranging from cash transfers for fishing communities to safely store their nets ahead of an impending cyclone, to livestock treatments for herders as a drought intensifies, to flood defences before a severe rainy season to protect crops.
This study analyses the outcomes of targeted early actions in Mongolia during the winter of 2017 to 2018, triggered by warnings that extreme weather posed a major risk to vulnerable livestock herders. It evaluates their effectiveness and quantifies the benefits of acting early.
From Early Warning to Early Action
©FA
O/P.
Kha
ngai
khuu
Acting early transforms the way we manage disasters. Protecting livelihoods stops crises becoming humanitarian emergencies.
Disaster strikes
2017
Humanitarian response
Early Warning Early Action approach
2020
2024
Action plansdeveloped
Monitoring early warning systems
Risk of disaster increasing
Warningtrigger
Fundsreleased
Early actionsimplemented
Trackingrecommendations
Follow-up evaluations
Risk of disaster increasing
Disaster strikes
Preparedness measures implemented
1
Livelihoodsimpacted or lost
Emergencyresponse
Funds are allocated
Livelihood supportscaled-up
+
Mongolia
Impact of Early Warning Early ActionProtecting the livelihoods of herders from a dzud winter
Preparedness efforts implemented to brace for impact and for quick response
livelihoods lost and food security impacted
Funds are allocated for response and recovery efforts
Implement early actions
Warningtrigger
Risk of disaster increasing
Funds released Disaster strikes
Disaster strikes
early warning system
protect livelihoods
Protects livelihood assets and long-term development gains protected
Reduces the cost of humanitarian response
Allows households to keep their livelihoods and dignity intact
Value added
1 2 3
Risk monitoring
Conflicts
Severe winters
Pest and diseases Floods
Droughts
Cyclones
Crop diversification, water resource management, food
preservation, supply of fertilizers, tools and pesticides
Storage containers for fishing gear, distribute fisheries kits, early warning information dissemination to safeguard fishers at sea
Prune trees, collect harvest, reinforce structures, install fire breaks
Vaccinations, value chain support, distribute fodder and nutritional supplements
Work within existing social protection mechanisms to distribute
cash to vulnerable households
Crop production
Animal health and livestock management
Fisheries
Cash transfer
Forestry
Early Warning Early Action approach
Humanitarian response
Risk of disaster increasing
Mongolia | 32 | Impact of Early Warning Early Action
FAO’S EWEA APPROACH
NEW INITIATIVE/PROJECT: EMERGENCY RESPONSE TO ENHANCE TECHNICAL CAPACITYFOR EARLY WARNING, MONITORING AND MANAGEMENT OF FALL ARMYWORM INMYANMAR
22 Module 2: FAW identification, biology, ecology and damage symptoms
Figure 9: Eggs hatching to larvae © Bill Hendrix (left), CABI (right)
Figure 11: FAW Larva and eggs © CABIFigure 10: FAW Larva © Ted C. MacRae, Monsanto
Pupae
• Pupae are reddish brown and may be hard to find for a typical farmer (Figure 6a)
• Pupation normally takes place in the soil, at a depth of 2 to 8 cm
• The larva constructs a loose cocoon, oval in shape and 20 to 30 mm in length
• If the soil is too hard, larvae may web together leaf debris and other material to form a cocoon on the soil surface. In some instances, the pupae may also be found in the maize cob (Figure 6b)
• The duration of the pupal stage is about eight to nine days during the summer, but reaches 20 to 30 days during the winter
NEW INITIATIVE/PROJECT: EMERGENCY RESPONSE TO ENHANCE TECHNICAL CAPACITYFOR EARLY WARNING, MONITORING AND MANAGEMENT OF FALL ARMYWORM INMYANMAR
Background
The Fall Armyworm (FAW) (Spodoptera frugiperda) is a transboundary insect pest, native to tropical and subtropical regions of the Americas and was first detected in Central and Western Africa in early 2016.
It prefers maize, but can feed on more than 80 additional species of crops, including rice, sorghum, millet, sugarcane, vegetable crops and cotton. An adult moth can fly over 100 km per night and can spread through traded commodities.
In July 2018, it was confirmed in India and Yemen. By early 2019, it had been reported in Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Myanmar, Thailand and China.
The FAW is suspected to have reached Myanmar through India during the period August-October 2018, and was confirmed in Myanmar for the first time in late 2018 in maize fields in the Ayeyarwady region.
MOALI field reports indicate that FAW had spread to crops including maize, rice, tomato, millet, green gram, sugarcane, some grass varieties and various vegetables.
Severely infested States and Regions as: Ayeyarwady, Bago, Mandalay, Yangon and Sagaing Regions and Shan State.
NEW INITIATIVE/PROJECT: EMERGENCY RESPONSE TO ENHANCE TECHNICAL CAPACITYFOR EARLY WARNING, MONITORING AND MANAGEMENT OF FALL ARMYWORM INMYANMAR
Conduct baseline assessment on FAW infestation in Myanmar
Awareness among all stakeholders (farmers / extension workers / plant protection officers / NGOs, etc.) on Fall Armyworm infestation in Myanmar increased
National FAW network, an efficient monitoring in Myanmar established
Action for FAW management in Myanmar developed and implemented
FISHADAPT PROJECT (GEF-LDCF): PARTICIPATORY GIS APPROACHES TO SUPPORT COMMUNITY LEVELVULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT FOR FISHERIES AND AQUACULTURE, ECOSYSTEMS APPROACH TO FISHERIESMANAGEMENT/AQUACULTURE AND COMMUNITY-BASED CCA AND DRM PLANNING
Draft outputs
Thank You
Top Related