8/10/2019 Legality of Counterterrorism Raids by Special Forces in International Law With Reference to Actions by Joint Specia
1/29
Legality of counterterrorism raids by Special Forces in
International Law: with reference to actions by Joint
Special Operations Command
Introduction
Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC) is a US and allied
commando unit, famously killing Osama Bin Laden. It leads a secret
glo!al "ar# against al$%aeda !y capturing and&or killing mem!ers of t'e
terrorist net"ork, and is a maor part of t'e O!ama administrations#
counterterrorism strategy. *'is essay focuses on t'ese e+traterritorial
counterterror raids, "'ere commando teams are transported to a foreign
country, gain entry to targeted premises and capture or kill t'e target.
JSOC 'as operated in Somalia, lgeria, t'e -'ilippines, Indonesia,
-akistan, *'ailand, ali, /emen, Colom!ia, -eru, 0arious 1uropean and
Central sian Countries, as "ell as Ira2 and fg'anistan. 3o"e0er t'is
essay focuses on raids unconnected to t'e Ira2&fg'anistan "ars.4*'is
essay looks at5 'o" raids are classified as armed conflicts6 t'e legality of
using of force in counterterror raids, including self$defence and
agreement&ac2uiescence of t'e territorial State6 "'et'er terrorists are
legal targets6 t'e legality of targeted killing&capture under International
1J. Scahill, Dirty Wars (London: Serpents Tail, 2013) 2432n.1 aboe, 1!3
1
8/10/2019 Legality of Counterterrorism Raids by Special Forces in International Law With Reference to Actions by Joint Specia
2/29
3umanitarian La" (I3L)6 urisdictional issues in relation to International
3uman 7ig'ts La" (I37L)6 depri0ations of rig'ts to life and li!erty6
applica!ility of derogations6 'o" I3L and I37L "ork toget'er in t'is
conte+t. *'oug' JSOC 'as engaged in targeted killing, it is not solely an
assassination programme, 89$8:; of raids capture targets peacefully. t'e
Dictim State could only use force on grounds of self$defence, as a la"ful
e+ception.:*'erefore, t'e use of counterterrorism raids could !e a legal
use of force in circumstances "'ere t'e Dictim State is acting in self$
defence and 'as no ot'er met'od of pre0enting terrorist attacks.
If t'e use of force is "it'out territorial State co$operation on self$
defence grounds, t'e actions "ould !e classed as an international
armed conflict, "it' t'e operating State acting against t'e territorial
State, despite targeting terrorists, due to t'e illegal territorial
infringement.@If raids are carried out !y co$operating "it' t'e territorial14n. aboe, 464-1/* Sec5rit= "o5ncil 7esol5tion 13-3 (2001)1>. Trapp, T"e Use of Force against Terrorists: A &e(ly to /"ristian 0, Tams , 2012,?5ropean Jo5rnal o ;nternational La,
8/10/2019 Legality of Counterterrorism Raids by Special Forces in International Law With Reference to Actions by Joint Specia
6/29
State against terrorists, t'e raid "ould !e go0erned !y t'e la" of non$
international armed conflict.8 3o"e0er, some of t'e States JSOC
operates in 'a0e not pu!lically declared consent, in0itation or
ac2uiescence to t'e US to carry out counterterror raids (t'oug' t'ere
may !e secret co$operation).A*'us, if acting on grounds of self$defence
"it'out consent, in0itation or ac2uiescence of t'e territorial State, la" of
international armed conflict applies to counterterror raids, if acting "it'
co$operation, t'e la" of non$international armed conflict apples.
3ot pursuit#, cannot legitimise cross$!order use of force, unless
commandos are acting in self$defence of an indi0idual. 3ot pursuit only
applies to maritime actions.4Commandos could only c'ase terrorists
cross$!order to use force against t'em, if acting in indi0idual self$
defence of t'emsel0es, or ot'ers.
Self!"efence
Legally resorting to force on t'e prete+t of self$defence, "it'out
territorial State co$operation must !e a legitimate act of self$defence,
meaningactions must !e necessary and proportionate to protect eit'er
t'e State or nationals. Erounds of self$defence to protect nationals
1!n. aboe, 14/6141
ln.1 aboe, 1!3A B. alsh, 'sama 4in Laden mission agreed in secret 56 years ago 4yU! and $a#istan The @5ardian, a= 201120n. aboe, -2A n.1 aboe, 21/621
8/10/2019 Legality of Counterterrorism Raids by Special Forces in International Law With Reference to Actions by Joint Specia
7/29
against terrorists 'a0e !een used !y t'e US, Iran, 1t'iopia, Israel, and
*urkey.4In t'e case of terrorists "'o intend to continue terrorism, using
force to 'alt suc' actions is necessary if t'ere is no ot'er pre0entati0e
alternati0e, suc' as freeFing assets.44*o !e proportionate, actions need
not !e measured against t'e original attack (or fort'coming attack if
acting in anticipation) !ut, must !e of a means necessary to ac'ie0e an
end to danger.4
8/10/2019 Legality of Counterterrorism Raids by Special Forces in International Law With Reference to Actions by Joint Specia
8/29
8/10/2019 Legality of Counterterrorism Raids by Special Forces in International Law With Reference to Actions by Joint Specia
9/29
8/10/2019 Legality of Counterterrorism Raids by Special Forces in International Law With Reference to Actions by Joint Specia
10/29
=irstly, raids must use legal means and met'ods of "arfare, and
a!ide !y t'e la"s and customs of "ar.
8/10/2019 Legality of Counterterrorism Raids by Special Forces in International Law With Reference to Actions by Joint Specia
11/29
medical and religious personnel, IC7C and U staff, can lose t'eir
protected status in t'e same "ay as ci0ilians, if t'ey directly participate
in 'ostilities.
8/10/2019 Legality of Counterterrorism Raids by Special Forces in International Law With Reference to Actions by Joint Specia
12/29
*o !e proportionate, t'ere must !e as little collateral damage# to
ci0ilians as possi!le. 3ig'er 0alue targets ustify larger degrees of
collateral, for e+ample decapitation strikes# targeting Saddam 3ussein
"ere legal, despite killing many ci0ilians.94Gue to differing 0alues of
indi0idual targets, raids cannot !e proportionate in general. *'us, t'e
proportionality of eac' counterterror raid must !e made on a case$!y$
case !asis "eig'ing military ad0antage "it' collateral.
If during a targeted killing raid, a target attempts to surrender or is
hors de combat, and killed any"ay, t'is "ould !e denial of 2uarter, a
serious 0iolation of t'e la"s and customs of "ar.9
8/10/2019 Legality of Counterterrorism Raids by Special Forces in International Law With Reference to Actions by Joint Specia
13/29
Applicability of International $uman 'ights Law
Jurisdiction issues
Some argue t'at e+traterritorial counterterror raids are not armed
conflicts, and I3L "ould not apply, 'o"e0er I37L "ould apply, and
"'ere t'ere is armed conflict, "ould apply simultaneously.9@ I37L
applies e+traterritorially to State agents6 t'e State is responsi!le for
ensuring its representati0es a!ide !y it. lso, ICC-7 rig'ts and
customary rig'ts apply to e0ery!ody uni0ersally.987egional treaties also
apply e+traterritorially6 +calan,- and Ale.andre/0 state regional treaties
apply to parties e+traterritorially, o0erturning 1an2ovi3.> In relation to
counterterror raids, States can claim urisdiction on grounds of nationality
(as t'e commandos and indi0iduals !eing protected are nationals), and
under t'e protecti0e principle ("'ere t'ere are issues of State security).
*'oug' passi0e personality may 'a0e !een rele0ant to drone killings of
US citiFens, t'is is outside t'is essays remit.>4dditionally, international4-7. ahad, Targeting + detention ;"7" blo9, ! oe'ber 2011. &ailable at: Ehttp:FFintercrossblo9.icrc.or9Fblo9Ftar9etin96s6detention I (&ccessed on 24 &pril 2014)4!* 85'an 7i9hts "o''ittee, S5''ar= record o the 1202nd 'eetin9 (second part),"onsideration o reports s5b'itted b= States parties 5nder article 40 o the "oenant:"roatia, 59oslaia, * Boc ""+7F"FS7.1202F&dd.1, 1/ &pril 13, 23A /ase /oncerningMilitary and $aramilitary Acti+ities in and Against Nicarag%a, ;"J, 1!A L5belln. aboe,1, 231623/4Ncalan . T5r$e= (&pp. o. 4221F) 12 a= 200/, 1/0&leGandre . 7ep5blic o "5ba, 7eport %. !F, "ase 11./!, 2 Septe'ber 1/1)an#o+i> and ot"er + )elgi%m and ot"ers(&pp. o. /220-F) 12 Bece'ber 2001, !0/2
. 8astin9s, T"e &ise of t"e Killer Drones: =ow America 2oes to War in !ecret 7ollin9Stone, &pril 1 2012 E http:FF.rollin9stone.co'FpoliticsFnesFthe6rise6o6the6$iller6drones6ho6a'erica69oes6to6ar6in6secret62012041I (&ccessed on 23 &pril 2014)
13
http://intercrossblog.icrc.org/blog/targeting-vs-detentionhttp://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-rise-of-the-killer-drones-how-america-goes-to-war-in-secret-20120416http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-rise-of-the-killer-drones-how-america-goes-to-war-in-secret-20120416http://intercrossblog.icrc.org/blog/targeting-vs-detentionhttp://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-rise-of-the-killer-drones-how-america-goes-to-war-in-secret-20120416http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-rise-of-the-killer-drones-how-america-goes-to-war-in-secret-201204168/10/2019 Legality of Counterterrorism Raids by Special Forces in International Law With Reference to Actions by Joint Specia
14/29
criminal urisdiction "ould !e rele0ant if commandos commit "ar
crimes.>9 *'erefore States 'a0e 'uman rig'ts o!ligations to"ard
indi0iduals "it'in its e+traterritorial urisdiction.>> *'us, indi0iduals
captured in counterterror raids, are o"ed 'uman rig'ts protections !y
t'e operating State. *'is applies "'et'er commando actions, and
detention are la"ful or not, as stated in Issa.>:In addition, t'e State is
responsi!le for any e+traterritorial 'uman rig'ts !reac'es.>@ 3o"e0er,
t'is does not include e0ery rig't. State agents acting e+traterritorially
"it' temporal urisdiction, need not ensure detainees could oin trade
unions, for e+ample. *'e rig'ts to !e protected are t'ose acutely
rele0ant to t'e precise circumstances of t'e indi0idual at t'at time, suc'
as rig't to li!erty and rig't to life, as stated in Ila4cu.>8It may !e enoug'
t'at States do not take acti0e steps to"ards !reac'ing rig'ts, as started
in t'e 'allcase relating to torture.>A*'us, as soon as indi0iduals are
captured in counterterror raids, t'ey are under t'e effecti0e control and
/3n. aboe, 20!620/4n.4 aboe, 1//n. aboe, 21!621/;ssa T5r$e= (&pp. o. 31!21F) 1 oe'ber 2004, -1/-Lo(e? +, Ur%g%ay, "o'' no /2F1-, * Boc ""+7F"F%+F1 (1!4), 12A /asariego +,
Ur%g%ay, "o'' no /F1-, * Boc ""+7F"F%+F1 (1!4), 10/!n. aboe, 22-6231A Ila@c% +, Moldo+a and &%ssia(&pp. o. 4!-!-F) ! J5l= 2004, 333/n.24 aboe, 112
14
8/10/2019 Legality of Counterterrorism Raids by Special Forces in International Law With Reference to Actions by Joint Specia
15/29
t'erefore urisdiction of t'e operating State, "'ic' is o!ligated to protect
t'e 'uman rig'ts of said indi0idual rele0ant at t'at time.
se of lethal force under International $uman 'ights Law
*'e ICC-7, along "it' regional treaties in frica, 1urope, and t'e
mericas, and U special$rapporteurs protect t'e rig't to life.:
Situations of killing "'ic' do not 0iolate t'e rig't to life include5 la"ful
deat' penalty6 legal killings under I3L6 a necessary and proportionate
use of force, "'ere killing "as t'e last option. :ny use of force must !e
legal under national la", ot'er"ise t'is "ould !reac' of t'e rig't to life, :4
and an ar!itrary killing may !reac' .us cogens according to elFer.:
0n. aboe, 1-01n. aboe, 1-12n./ aboe, 22/3
n./ aboe, 224n./ aboe, !/6A Isaye+a + &%ssia(&pp. o. /-/0F33) 24 #ebr5ar= 200/, 1!0/n./ aboe, 232
1/
8/10/2019 Legality of Counterterrorism Raids by Special Forces in International Law With Reference to Actions by Joint Specia
16/29
(eprivation of life shall not be regarded as inflicted in
contravention of this Article when it results from the use of force
which is no more than absolutely necessary5 a6 in defence of
any person from unlawful violence; 7b6 in order to effect a lawful
arrest or to prevent the escape of a person lawfully detained!#
*'us, let'al force is proportionate only "'ere strictly una0oida!le for
t'e protection of 'uman life from a real t'reat of unla"ful 0iolence. ::In
counterterrorism, t'e t'reat posed !y escape&non$arrest of targets
ustifies potentially let'al force due to t'e t'reat t'ey pose t'roug'
terrorism. *o !e proportionate, eac' operation must !e aimed at
pre0enting, or stopping a concrete terrorist attack, and could reasona!ly
e+pect to pre0ent or stop suc' an attack.:@ In a counterterror raid,
proportionate use of let'al force can only !e used to preser0e life, !y
pre0enting a concrete future terrorist attack, or protecting an indi0idual.
=or let'al force to !e necessary it must !e t'e only option left,
'a0ing e+'austed all non$let'al means, incapacitation or capture must
!e insufficient to pre0ent furt'er deat'.:8 *'ere must also !e precautions
taken to ensure let'al force is not used unless a!solutely necessary, as
s'ooters cannot !e a!sol0ed !y superior orders. *'erefore any
decisions to use let'al force must !e constantly re0ie"ed and
n./ aboe, 232A n. aboe, 1-3-Mc/ann + UK(&pp. o.1!!4F1) 2- Septe'ber 1/!n.0 aboe, 32A elern./ aboe, 22!
1
8/10/2019 Legality of Counterterrorism Raids by Special Forces in International Law With Reference to Actions by Joint Specia
17/29
communicated to commandos. Commandos must "arn of intentions to
use let'al force, in a uniform, to allo" for surrender6 unless "arnings
"ould !e inappropriateH for e+ample confrontation "it' suicide
!om!ers.:A *'us, for let'al force in a C* raid to !e necessary, it must !e
t'e only option left to protect life, and constantly under re0ie".
"epri&ation of liberty under International $uman 'ights Law
In terms of capture operations, t'ose indi0iduals are depri0ed of
t'eir li!erty, "'et'er detained la"fully or unla"fully. *'oug' many are
legally depri0ed of t'e rig't to li!erty, for e+ample la"ful arrest, ar!itrary
detention is a !reac' of t'e ICC-7, frican, merican and 1uropean
treaties,@and customary international la".@*'us, all capture raids must
'a0e a la"ful reason to depri0e t'e target of t'eir li!erty to a0oid !eing
e+traterritorial e+traudicial a!ductions, and potentially ar!itrary detention
contra0ening t'e rig't to li!erty.@4
=or a depri0ation of li!erty to !e la"ful, it must !e in accordance "it'
domestic and international la". *'erefore, s'ould an arrest take place
n./ aboe, 23/623-0&rt. , ;nternational "onention on "iil and +olitical 7i9hts(;""+7)A &rt. -, &'erican"onention on 85'an 7i9hts(&"87)A &rt. , &rican "harter on 85'an and +olitical7i9hts(&"8+7)A &rt. /, ?5ropean "onention on 85'an 7i9hts(?"87)-1* 85'an 7i9hts "o''ittee, @eneral "o''ent 24 (/2), * Boc
""+7F"F21F7e.1F&dd. (14), !-27. 8i99ins, $ro4lems $rocess: International Law and =ow We Use it(%ord: %*+,14) -0
1-
8/10/2019 Legality of Counterterrorism Raids by Special Forces in International Law With Reference to Actions by Joint Specia
18/29
!reac'ing I3L or I37L, t'e depri0ation of li!erty "ould !e unla"ful. @*o !e legal domestically, it must at minimum
a0oid5 disproportionate use of force6 ill$treatment6 denial of habeas
corpusrig'ts6 ina!ility to appeal court decisions, potential illegality "ould
!e e0aluated on a case$!y$case !asis.@:S'ould detentions !e secret,
t'ey run t'e risk of !eing 2ualified as a disappearance, "'ic' are
pro'i!ited.@@Some raids carried out !y JSOC 'a0e !een performed
"it'out territorial State kno"ledge, t'us t'e territorial infringement and
t'erefore detention may !e illegal,@8along "it' illegal disappearances,
and interrogations including torture, 'o"e0er t'is essay is focused on
t'e raids t'emsel0es.@A
"erogations of rights
-3n. aboe, 1!4-4Bo'5$os$= and others . @eor9ia, "o'' no 2F1/""+7F"F2FBF(1/)-/n. aboe, 1!/-n. aboe, 1!/61!--&rt.1 and &rt.2, ;nternational "onention or the +rotection o &ll +ersons ro' ?norced
Bisappearance-!n.1 aboe, 23--n.1 aboe 14-611
1!
8/10/2019 Legality of Counterterrorism Raids by Special Forces in International Law With Reference to Actions by Joint Specia
19/29
*'oug' t'e rig't to life cannot !e derogated from, t'e rig't to
li!erty can !e.8
Capture in !reac' of t'e rig't to li!erty could still !e
legal if t'e acting State la"fully derogates from rig't to li!erty.
Gerogations are particularly rele0ant "'en a ci0ilian is captured !ecause
t'ey 'a0e information on targets, or "'ose freedom is used as le0erage
during anot'er detainee#s interrogation.8*o !e la"ful under t'e ICC-7,
and 1uropean and merican con0entions, derogations must !e5 allo"ed
under t'e rele0ant c'arter6 in t'e presence of a serious pu!lic
emergency6 strictly re8uired by the exigencies of the situation9;84and t'e
State must fulfil procedural re2uirements to notify of derogations.844@&AA) 4Gecem!er 4
Ila4cu v! "oldova and )ussia(pp. o. 98@8@&AA) 8 July 49
Isayeva v )ussia(pp. o. >@A>&
8/10/2019 Legality of Counterterrorism Raids by Special Forces in International Law With Reference to Actions by Joint Specia
27/29
Inter$merican Court of 3uman 7ig'ts
leandre 0. 7epu!lic of Cu!a, 7eport O. 8:&AA, Case .>8A, 4A
Septem!er AAA
Ot'er courts
Israel 3ig' Court of Justice, *'e $ublic *ommittee against :orture in
Israel v Israel, 3CJ @:A&4, Gecem!er 4>
* $uman 'ights Committee
*asariego v! %ruguay, Comm no >:&A@A, U Goc CC-7&C&O-&(A89)
Gomuko0sky and ot'ers 0. Eeorgia, Comm no :4:&AA> CC-7&C&:4&G&(AA>)
Eeneral Comment 49 (>4), U Goc CC-7&C&4&7e0.&dd.: (AA9)
Eeneral Comment 4A, States of 1mergency (rticle 9) U GocCC-7&C&4&7e0.&dd. (4)
Lope= v! %ruguay, Comm no >4&A@A, U Goc CC-7&C&O-& (A89)
Summary record of t'e 44nd meeting (second part), Consideration ofreports su!mitted !y States parties under article 9 of t'e Co0enant5
Croatia, /ugosla0ia#, U Goc CC-7&C&S7.44&dd. (AAoverns Armed *onflict? :he )elationship
2-
8/10/2019 Legality of Counterterrorism Raids by Special Forces in International Law With Reference to Actions by Joint Specia
28/29
1etween International Humanitarian Law and International Human)ights Law# innesota La" 7e0ie", 44, Dol. A:(:), 88
8/10/2019 Legality of Counterterrorism Raids by Special Forces in International Law With Reference to Actions by Joint Specia
29/29
/ebsites
G. kande, Are xtraterritorial Armed *onflicts with &onCState >roupsInternational or &onCInternational? 8 Octo!er 4, 1JIL Blog,
M'ttp5&&""".eiltalk.org&are$e+traterritorial$armed$conflicts$"it'$non$state$groups$international$or$non$international&N (ccessed on 44 pril 49)
. 3astings, :he )ise of the oes to 'arin Secret # 7olling Stone, pril : 44 M'ttp5&&""".rollingstone.com&politics&ne"s&t'e$rise$of$t'e$killer$drones$'o"$america$goes$to$"ar$in$secret$449:N (ccessed on 4< pril49)
7. a'ad, :argeting v detention# IC7C !log, 8 o0em!er 4.
0aila!le at5 M 'ttp5&&intercross!log.icrc.org&!log&targeting$0s$detentionN(ccessed on 49 pril 49)
-. Sands %C, 2uoted !y . Le"is, sama 1in Laden5 Legality of 2illing8uestions# BBC, 4 ay 4 M'ttp5&&""".!!c.co.uk&ne"s&"orld$sout'$asia$
Top Related