Korea’s Success Model of Industrializationand Roles of Deans Council in Economic Development
20th October, 2010Singapore 20th October, 2010Singapore
Prof. Wonjong JooInnovation Center for Engineering Education
Seoul National Univ. of Science and Technology
2
Contents
I. Korea’s Compressed Development Model
II. Innovation Center for Engineering Education
III. Seoul Tech ICEE Operation
3
I.Korea’s Compressed Development Model
<One generation efforts can change the shape of a nation>
4
Korea in Asia
Geopolitically sensitive region
Only one divided country
Korea can be a hub country in Asia !
Within 3 hrs distance from Seoul,
1) 61 metropolitans having more than 1 million population2) 1/3 world population3) 20% of World GDP4) Purchasing power same as USA
5
1951, Korean warSeoul
6
Early 1960s: 2 bridges
Han River (Seoul)
7
At the end of Korean War
NO money
NO Technology
NO Natural resources
YES we have People
Isolation -> Colony -> World War II -> Korean War -> Division-> Instability (for 100 years)
8
Now
Seoul
9
Now: 26 bridges
Han River at Seoul
10
1963 $ 100
1970 $ 250
1996 $10,000
2009 < ~20,000
100 times(4.5 times growth, every 10 years)
Less than 2 times during last 13 years
GNI
11
Strong Leadership
12
Woolsan City
Construction Site of Hyundai Shipbuilding Co., year 1972
13
Shipbuilding Ship Engine Offshore Electrical Construction Platform Systems Vehicles
Woolsan City
Hyundai Heavy Industry Co.
14
- Shipbuilding #1 - Display #1 - Mobile Phone #2 - Automobile #5
-GDP #12 ($928.7b, ’08) Export # 8 ($383.5 b, ‘09)
- - R&D Budget # 7 ($33.6 Billion, ‘07)
-Int. License Reg. # 4 (‘07)
- 2008 Beijing Olympic # 7
- 2010 Winter Olympic # 5
- 2002 Worldcup #4
-Population # 26 (48 Million, ‘06)
-Higher Edu. Rate #1 (56%, OECD Ave. 34%, ‘07)
Industry Competitiveness
Science/ Technology
Economic Power Human Resource
Sports
Korean Drama
~ Rank 10
Korea’s Accomplishments
15
Reasons 1: Fast Economic Growth
0) International Help
1) Adversities in last 100 years2) Respect to scholar (Education)3) Free Market, Enterprise, and Trade4) Strong Leadership5) Qualified/ diligent Engineer
Only one country to be a donor from a receiver !!
16
Reason 2: Fast Economic Growth
Co-work: Check and Balance
17
Korea’s View: World Economy Trend
- Conversance Electric Car (Me + EE) Smart Phone (IT + conts)
- IT, BT, NT Fusion
- U-Health
- New Energy Source Business
- Climate change CO2 Market(‘06) 36B (‘07) 64B (‘10) $150B
- China’s Energy C
- New Emerging Countries / BRICs
- China: World Factory to Market
- City construction Fusion
Green
G20
18
17 Driving items
Recovery Energy
CO2 reduced Energy
Water Treatment
LED Applications
Green Transportation
Green City
Broadcast+Telecom
IT Fusion
Robot Applications
New Material (Nano)
Bio-Pham, Med. Eq’t
High Add. Food
Global Healthcare
Global Education
Green Finance
Contents/SW
MICE/ Tour
Green Fusion Service
Korea’s next Driving Forces
19
II. Innovation Center for Engineering Education
< Change everything except wife!>
20
GNIEconomic crisis 2
Economy 5 year Plan
Economic crisis1
NI Trend Analysis
Specialized Universities
Expansion of Universities
Quality ?Mismatch !
21
Korea Korea
33.2%33.2%
1990
83.8%83.8%
2008
USA USA Japan Japan
1990 2006 1990 2-06
59.9%59.9%61.9%61.9%
36.3%36.3%46%46%
Reflection: University Entrance Rate
22
14,90414,904
2001
35,56935,569
2009
71,24171,24171,24171,24179,54179,54179,54179,541
2001 2009 2001 2009
259,215259,215259,215259,215340,638340,638340,638340,638
239%239%
Korea Korea USA USA Japan Japan
Reflection: SCI Paper Publication
Research competence (?): SCI Papers: rank 12, Quotation: rank 14
* Total papers: 1,158,247papers, Korea 35,569 papers (2.4%)
The Times-QS Evaluation : Only 4 universities in top best 200s (’09)
23
World top of entrance rate: 33.2% (’90) → 68.0% (’00) → 83.8%(’08)
Completion rate of higher education for ages 25-34 : OECD Rank 1 or 2 (56%)
Satisfaction level of Univ. education : 3.1/5.0
IMD World competition Report : Lack of response to society needs
* Adaptedness of university education to the society (rank 51/57
countries)
* Supply level of qualified engineers (rank 50)
Reflection: Quantity VS Quality
Innovation = SpecializationInnovation = Specialization
2424
Start of Innovation for EE
- Industry complaints
- Government asked Deans Council of College of Engineering
- One year (2006) workshop of DCCE+ Government+ SERI
-SERI benchmarked world role model universities and made a guideline of ICEE
-10 universities was selected for preparing sample proposals that were distributed to all colleges of engineering
26
“Need-based Innovation for Engineering Education”
Industry’s contribution
Innovation of Policy
• Specialization based on a strategic plan of Univ.
• Industry Need-based Eng. Education Setting
• Reinforcement of Industry supporting functions
• Exact needs signal to Universities• Reinforcement of collaboration with
university• Participation on ABEEK
• Expanding invest on Education• Efficient Funding methods• Systematic Support for Industry
collaboration
Innovation of C. of Eng.
Government: Basic Direction for Innovation
27
- Lack of hard skills: Math, science, major, and practical knowledge for solving real problems
- Lack of soft skills: communication, teamwork, inter-personal skills
■ High unemployment rate / shortage of manpower (quantity mismatch)
■ Gap between industry’s expect and University’s education (quality mismatch)
■ The mismatch problem is rooted from a unified, supply-centered education
No guarantee of competitiveness with supply-centered educationKey Issues
Ⅰ. Why demander’s viewsⅠ. Why demander’s views
28
- Lack of adaptive ability of graduates to practical fields
- Increase of re-education cost for the new employees
· training cost per an employee: $100,000, ~30 months
(FKI , 2005)
■ Lack of strategic differences between universities
■ Research & education estranged from industry’s needs
2. Main University Issues in Demander’s views 2. Main University Issues in Demander’s views
2929
Innovation = Our Own
30
■ Lack of Government policies to enforcement each university’s specialties
■ Weak incentive system based on assessment
■ Lack of Government policies for industry collaboration
3. Main Policy Issues in Demander’s views 3. Main Policy Issues in Demander’s views
■ Lack of practical communication between industry and universities
Basic Direction of E-E InnovationBasic Direction of E-E Innovation
31
■ Strategic positioning of each university and engineering education to meet industry needs
■ Quality assurance for the suggested new model
- SERI suggest various models for a university and a department to
distinguish from others.- Suggest various Prototypes (contents, methods) for the innovation of
engineering education
■ Model suggestion for a university to select its strategies
Situation analysisSituation analysis
Needs analysisNeeds analysis
Strategic directionStrategic direction
SurveySurvey Benchmarking
Benchmarking
Finding IEE directionFinding IEE direction
Ideas extractionIdeas extraction
Indust./Univ. needs analysisIndust./Univ.
needs analysis BenchmarkingBenchmarking
Univ. Innov.
Univ. Innov. Policy Inno,Policy Inno, Indust. rolesIndust. roles I/U interactionI/U interaction
PlanningPlanning
EEI ActionEEI Action
Stage1. Visioning
Stage2. Innov. items
Stage3. Action Planning
Visioning, Idea search, action
Forum/ consultin
g
SERI
Process of InnovationProcess of Innovation
33
Innovation = Competition
34
1) As-Is analysis
2) SWOT Analysis
3) Regional industry’s situation analysis
4) To-Be configuration
5) Gap (between As-Is and To-Be) analysis
6) Find alternative solutions to be To-Be
University’s Innovation Process
output demand
R&D Engineer Technician
Firm Specific
• Tailored research to a specific company
• Co-research with a specific company
•Tailored engineers education to a specific company
•Test, certification, process improvement, education, etc for a specific company’s product development
•Tailored technicians education to a specific company
Industry Specific
•R&D manpower education for a specific region/ industry
•Contracted research with a company for a specific region/ industry
•Engineers education to a specific region/ industry
•Difficult field technique education a specific regional industry
•Technician education to a specific region/ industry
Industry Wide
•R&D manpower education for a wide range of industry
•Government driving research
•Engineers education for a wide range of industry
•Fundamental technique education
•Technician education for a wide range of industry
Role Models of E-E InnovationRole Models of E-E Innovation
output
demand
R&D Engineer Technician
Firm Specific
Industry Specific
Industry Wide
A-1 Department
A-2 Department
A-3 Department
B Configuration
University A Configuration
output
demand
R&D Engineer Technician
Firm Specific
Industry Specific
Industry Wide
A Configuration
B-1 Department
B-1 Department
University B Configuration
38
output
demand
R&D Engineer Technician
Firm Specific
Industry Specific
Industry Wide
AS-IS
TO-BE
As-Is vs To-Be
39
output
demand
R&D Engineer Technician
Firm Specific
Industry Specific
Industry Wide
MIT, 4,581 (2005) 4,498 (1998)
(14.7%) (6.1%)
(49.9%)(29.3%)
1998년
14.9% 11.1%
37.5%36.5%
2005년
MIT Configuration
40
Innovation Process
41
2 Eng. FusionHub Center
ICEE Hub Center 1
Hub Center Council
ICEE Hub Center 2
Seoul TechICEE Hub Center
(20 Univ)
ICEE Hub Center 4
ICEE Hub Center 5
ICEE Center
60 ICEEs5 Hub Center2 Fusion Hub C.5 years project
III. Seoul Tech ICEE Operation<Present technologies won’t exist after 10 years>
Seoul Tech. (SNUT -> SNUST)Seoul Tech. (SNUT -> SNUST)
• Undergraduate: 12,500/ Graduate; 1,300 / Faculty ~400
• University strategy: NT+IT+Design Fusion technology• Seoul Techno-Park ( Seoul TP)
• ICEE Hub university/ Capstone Design Hub University
Seoul TP
Seoul Techno PolisSeoul TP K. Electric Co.
Atomic Medical Center
Seoul Tech. Seoul Tech.
Business Incubator Center
45
SWOT Analysis
Strength -> Maximize strength
Weakness -> Overcome weakness
Opportunities -> Utilize opportunities
Threats -> Prepare threats
46
10%10%
7%7%
38%38% 15%15%
35%35% 78%78%
5%5%19%19%
21%21%
60%60%
27%27%
85%85%
By:Specialized Dep.Contract Dep.Fusion Grad. Sch.NITU (senior yr)
Seoul Tech. Configuration
47
Produce top 30% students to be 1st and 2nd levels
Flexible program basis
Utilize retired professors and industry people
Establish assessment system on professor /department / college
Demand (student, industry) oriented education
1 professor-1 teaching assistant
Establish specialized graduate school and ROU
Establish win-win industry collaboration
Clearly purposed dual system (day and evening)
Job placement rate 90% by demand oriented education
Establish a standard feed-back system
TO-BE
AS-IS
Student average level: 3rd/9 levels
Rigid department basis
High student-professor ratio
Lack of assessment system
Supply (univ.) oriented education
Big load of education and admin. Work on Professor
Lack of research manpower
Formal industry collaboration
Evening class Miss-match of curriculum
Job placement rate 80%
Weak feed-back student system
Gap analysis
48
Innovation Items 1
49
Innovation Items 2
50
Innovation Items 3
51
Innovation Items 4
52
건국대 , 국민대 , 동국대 , 서울산업대 , 숭실대 , 중앙대
한국산업기술대 , 한국항공대
건양대 , 단국대 ( 천안 ), 선문대 , 순천향대 , 한국기술교육대
한밭대
제주대
목포대 , 순천대
전주대
영동대 , 충주대
Seoul Tech ICEE Hub Center (20 universities)
53
Seoul Tech Hub Center: Work together :•From competition & isolation to cooperation & openness•Real time sharing•Minimize mistakes
54
3+1 system16 Univ’s. Join
Basic educational courses at their own universities
Freshman
Sophomore
Junior
Senior
NITU Program(MSP as well as Nano-devices)
Selection Process
ICEE Outcomes: NITU program
55
Umbrella-Type Nano+IT University Umbrella-Type Nano+IT University
Jointly develop courses & a credit transfer system
Collaboration with foreign universities
Hands-on experiments & facilities provided by Seoul TP and participating industries
Project Based Learning System, Team Teaching, NIT Capstone Design
16 Universities join Senior year (1 year ) program: “Microsystems packaging” Teaching staff: Industry people (60%) + professor (40%)
ICEE Outcomes: NITU program
ICEE Outcomes: Workshops +Seminars
57
ICEE Outcomes: Global Workshop
58
ICEE Outcomes: 2010 SMART Design Camp
59
ICEE Outcomes: Friendship
60
ICEE Outcomes: Global network
On 17th November, 2010“International Capstone Design Fair”
RHIT 와 MOU 체결
61
School Seoul Tech Rose-Hulman Inst. Tech.
Depart.Mechanical Design &
Auto.
Electrical and Computer
Eng.
Prof. D. Kim Daniel J. Moore
Studen
tsS. Suh, S. Park, Y. Na
Adam, Jon, Sam, Mark,
Jiangfeng
Produc
t4 족로봇 하드웨어 구현에 중점
Embedded system 구현에
중점
ICEE: Outcomes: Global network
International Joint Capstone Design
62
ICEE Outcomes: Global network
63
ICEE Outcomes: Kanazawa U (Japan) visit
Structure of Design I, II, and III courses
64
Vision to ActionVision to Action
Top Related