Jeffco Citizens Leadership Academy
August-October 2013
Building Bright Futures Together
Schedule• August 27– Welcome, Overview of Jeffco, Budget
• September 3 and 10– Instruction
• September 17– Results and Schools
• September 24– Support Services, Business Services, Employee
Relations, Communications
• October 1– Board of Education and Graduation
Effectiveness
Colorado Academic Standards
New Generation
Data
READGraduati
onRequirements
PARCC
All means
All
TimeCompensation
Staffing
100% Bright Futures
Great Starts! Class of 2026!• Sustainabl
e Skills• Ethical
Human Beings
• Essential Qualities
• Passions
Strong Finishes! Class of 2014!
Rigor / Releva
nce
Relation-
ships
Climate
WHAT DOES MYVH MEASURE?
OVERALL POSITIVE RESPONSES FROM STUDENTS
All means on constructs and items are
above 2.5 (considered the mid-point on the
scale).1
2
3
4
Agre
eD
isagre
e
Best Practices
Professional Excellence
Road Map
Reading Writing Math Science+10
0
-10
Gr. 5
Gr. 10
Gr. 4,6,8Gr. 3,5
Gr. 9
Gr. 10
Gr. 8Gr. 4,6,7
Gr. 9Gr. 3,4,8,10
Gr. 5,6,
Gr. 7
Overall TCAP Ups and Downs for all Students Three Year Trend (2010 to 2013)
Gr. 10
+5
-5
Gr. 7,9
Gr. 5Gr. 3
Gr. 10
* Not a matched cohort across years.
Reading Writing Math Science+10
0
-10
Gr. 5
Gr. 10
Gr. 3,5
Gr. 10
Gr. 9
Gr. 6,8
Gr. 9Gr. 4
Gr. 7,8
Gr. 3
Overall TCAP Ups and Downs for Free and Reduced Lunch Students
Three Year Trend (2010 to 2013)
Gr. 10
+5
-5
Gr. 5Gr. 5,6
Gr. 8
Gr. 7
Gr. 4
Gr. 6,8,9,10
Gr. 7
Gr. 3
Gr. 4
*Not a matched cohort across years.
Reading Writing Math Science+10
0
-10
Gr. 5
Gr. 10
Gr. 5,6
Gr. 9
Gr. 3,8
Gr. 6
Gr. 5
Gr. 4,9
Overall Up’s and Downs for Hispanic Students Three Year Trend (2010 to 2013)
Gr. 10
+5
-5
Gr. 8
Gr. 9
Gr. 8
Gr. 7
Gr. 3,5,6
Gr. 10
Gr. 7
Gr. 7,8
Gr. 4,10
Gr. 4
Gr. 3
*Not a matched cohort across years.
Content
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Reading 51 51 53 50 51Math 55 53 55 55 55Writing 48 49 50 49 50
Jeffco Median Growth Percentile Reading Trends
Reading 2010 2011 2012 2013
All grades 51 53 50 51
Elementary 55 57 54 55
Middle 47 49 48 48
High 49 53 46 47
Grade 2010 2011 2012 2013
4 54 54 51 52
5 49 52 49 52
6 60 63 60 60
7 45 48 47 47
8 48 48 50 49
9 50 52 46 45
10 48 54 46 50
Green denotes growth that meets or exceeds state typical growth of 50
Jeffco Median Growth Percentile Writing Trends
Grade 2010 2011 2012 2013
4 50 55 50 53
5 45 48 46 47
6 57 60 58 59
7 45 44 45 47
8 46 46 48 47
9 49 48 48 47
10 51 50 50 49
Writing 2010 2011 2012 2013
All grades 49 50 49 50
Elementary 51 55 52 53
Middle 46 45 47 48
High 50 49 49 48
Green denotes growth that meets or exceeds state typical growth of 50
Jeffco Median Growth Percentile Math Trends
Math 2010 2011 2012 2013
All grades
53 55 55 55
Elementary 56 55 55 56
Middle 52 54 54 54
High 52 57 55 55
Grade 2010 2011 2012 2013
4 49 50 50 54
5 56 52 54 52
6 61 62 61 62
7 52 56 58 55
8 53 52 50 51
9 53 57 55 54
10 51 57 55 57
Green denotes growth that meets or exceeds state typical growth of 50
District Performance Framework
ACT: Jeffco
•J21.0 21.0 21.2 21.2
20.0 19.9 20.0 20.1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2010 2011 2012 2013
Jeffco
Colorado
Elementary GrowthDistrict Reading Writing MathJeffco 55 53 56Cherry Creek 56 54 56
Adams 12 51 51 51
Douglas County 54 55 52
Littleton 53 56 50
Boulder 60 58 57
Denver 53 53 55
Aurora 46 46 52
Middle Level Growth
District Reading Writing MathJeffco 48 48 54Cherry Creek 51 54 53
Adams 12 56 43 43
Douglas County 48 47 47
Littleton 50 54 55
Boulder 54 55 51
Denver 52 56 56
Aurora 53 52 47
Senior High GrowthDistrict Reading Writing MathJeffco 47 48 55Cherry Creek 53 55 56
Adams 12 49 49 44
Douglas County 53 53 48
Littleton 49 51 52
Boulder 44 47 56
Denver 58 54 52
Aurora 56 50 52
2013 10th Grade TCAP Math District Comparisons
District2012 Percent Advanced &
Proficient
2013 Percent Advanced &
Proficient
Percentage Point Change
from 2012
Poverty Rate(2013)
Douglas 43% 45% 2 11Boulder 51% 50% -1 19Littleton 51% 49% -2 21Cherry Creek 41% 42% 1 25St. Vrain 36% 41% 5 33Brighton 18% 22% 4 34
Jeffco 42% 43% 1 34Adams 12 29% 30% 1 37Colorado 33% 34% 1 42Aurora 18% 20% 2 68Mapleton 16% 14% -2 71Denver 21% 25% 4 71Westminster 7% 7% 0 81Adams 14 8% 9% 1 82
Source: Colorado Department of Education
Remediation Rate Comparisons
District Remediation Rate
Poverty Rate(2013)
Douglas 25.6% 11Boulder 23.1% 19Littleton 25.9% 21Cherry Creek 33.4% 25St. Vrain 34.9% 33Brighton 54.1% 34
Jeffco 29.8% 34Adams 12 45% 37Colorado 39.2% 42Aurora 53.3% 68Mapleton 64.5% 71Denver 60.4% 71Westminster 59.1% 81Adams 14 81.3% 82
Jeffco’s Mission…..
To provide a quality education that prepares ALL children for a successful future…..
Top Related