Download - IPv6 - The Time Is Now: Latif Ladid, President, IPv6 forum

Vision & Way Forward

Vision & Way Forward 6

From to

From

NATwork of NATworks

Network of Networks to


100

80

60

40

20

The Internet took a long time to make it!


RFC801 – NCP / TCP Transition Plan

Total Hosts Dual Hosts NCP Hosts TCP Hosts "Load" Date 200 20 178 2 356 Jan-82 210 40 158 12 1896 Mar-82 220 60 135 25 3375 May-82 225 95 90 40 3600 Jul-82

230 100 85 45 3825 Sep-82 240 125 55 60 3300 Nov-82 245 155 20 70 1400 Dec-82 250 170 0 80 0 31-Dec-82 250 0 0 250 0 1-Jan-83

Network Working Group J. Postel Request for Comments: 801 ISI

November 1981


Internet was Competing against others

100

80

60

40

20


109- Net10 Innovators

NAT engineers

WWW- Client/Server

33 Kbps

Public Internet

104

Pioneers

Email, FTP

9.6 Kbps

Gov. Internet

1038

EveryOne Everything

Wireless, Streaming Media, P2P, GRID

1 Mbps +

Global Internet

DIAL-UP INTERNET ALWAYS-ON

NCP IPv4/NAT IPv6

TOURISTS RESIDENTS


The IPv4 Address Exhausting Debate J

0% FEB 2011

0/256


Norway has 9 M IPv4 addresses, with 2 IP address per citizen


Deal with IPv4 Exhaustion Carrier IPv4 NAT—“NAT444”

IPv4 IPv4

IPv4

Private IP

Private IP Moves into the ISP

Private IP

Private IP

Private IP

Private IP

IPv4


Max 30 Translations


Max 20 Translations


Max 15 Translations


Max 10 Connections


All ISPs will have to take off like this!” Anonymous 2010


The Lobster Syndrom!

Yv4: The Y2K for Internet!


Trillions of - RFIDs - Sensors

Billions of Smart Devices -  Vehicles -  Buildings

5 Billions -  Mobile Phones -  PDAs -  10% Internet 3-500 M

- PCs


Some e-Government

Some Competitiveness

Legacy Technologies Not agile for smarter ways

Information Society transportation

Society Commerce Transportation Government

infrastructure Narrowband Dial-up Home Poor Media

IPv4


Efficient Government

Improved Competitiveness

Use new technologies in smarter ways

Information Society

IPv6

Smart transportation

e-society e-Commerce e-Transportation e-Government

e-infrastructure Broadband

Home Multimedia

IPv6

IPv6

IPv6


à

à


“The IPv6 Final Marathon”

Perception: IPv4 is Innovation - IPv6: an Upgrade

Yv4 Yv6 Not needed Needed?

Innovation Upgrade

Powerful Same & More

Political Goodwill

Business Drivers

Technology Value

Infrastructure


Yv4 Yv6 World Regions Population

( 2008 Est.) Internet Users Dec/31, 2000

Internet Usage,

Latest Data

% Population ( Penetration )

Usage % of World

Usage Growth

2000-2008

Africa 955,206,348 4,514,400 51,065,630 5.3 % 3.5 % 1,031.2 %

Asia 3,776,181,949 114,304,000 578,538,257 15.3 % 39.5 % 406.1 %

Europe 800,401,065 105,096,093 384,633,765 48.1 % 26.3 % 266.0 %

Middle East 197,090,443 3,284,800 41,939,200 21.3 % 2.9 % 1,176.8 %

North America 337,167,248 108,096,800 248,241,969 73.6 % 17.0 % 129.6 %

Latin America/Caribbean 576,091,673 18,068,919 139,009,209 24.1 % 9.5 % 669.3 %

Oceania / Australia 33,981,562 7,620,480 20,204,331 59.5 % 1.4 % 165.1 %

WORLD TOTAL 6,676,120,288 360,985,492 1,463,632,361 21.9 % 100.0 % 305.5 %

IPv4 Achieved the Critical 20% IPv6 Can Drive Growth & Continuity!

WORLD INTERNET USAGE & POPULATION STATISTICS


IPv6 ripeness grouped by year of becoming an LIR

100

80

60

40

20

Experimental Phase

(1999 - 2002) .

Early Adopters (2002 - 2007)

Deployment (2007 - Now) Since 2007 a growing number

of IPv6 allocation requests.


IPv6 Enabled Root Servers

Today 206 of root servers instances/mirrors – 192 IPv6 capable (source: www.root-servers.org)

14-July-2010: 9 of 13 root servers can be queried over IPv6, Putting IPv6 on equal footing with IPv4 – [A B F H I J K L M ].root-servers.net


IPv6 Visible Prefixes per EU States

1 Germany 224 2 Netherlands 140 3 United Kingdom 137 4 Italy 90 5 France 79 6 EU 78 7 Switzerland 67 8 Sweden 65 9 Poland 61 10 Austria 54 11 Czech Republic 49 12 Finland 36 13 Norway 28 14 Denmark 23 15 Ireland 22 16 Spain 21 17 Slovenia 21 18 Ukraine 20 19 Hungary 15 20 Belgium 14 21 Portugal 11 22 Luxembourg 11 23 Bulgaria 10 24 Slovakia 10


Overall, 8% of European ISPs have achieved four-star IPv6 ripeness

100

80

60

40

20

Where to act?


EU Telco v6 Readiness

P&T Luxembourg (pt.lu) FAIL FAIL 0/3 0/3 FAIL FAIL

PT (Portugal Telecom) (telecom.pt)

SUCCESS FAIL 0/0 0/3 N/A FAIL

Romtelecom (romtelecom.ro) FAIL FAIL 0/2 0/2 N/A FAIL

Rostelecom (rt.ru) FAIL FAIL 0/0 0/2 N/A FAIL SFR (sfr.fr) FAIL FAIL 0/1 0/3 N/A FAIL

Slovak Telekom (telecom.sk) PROBLEM FAIL 0/2 0/2 FAIL FAIL

Slovak Telekom (slovaktelekom.sk) FAIL FAIL 0/0 0/2 N/A FAIL

Türk Telekom (turktelekom.com.tr) FAIL FAIL 0/0 0/2 FAIL FAIL

TDK (tdk.dk) FAIL FAIL 0/0 0/2 N/A FAIL Tele2 (tele2.com) FAIL FAIL 0/0 0/2 N/A FAIL Tele2 (tele2.se) FAIL FAIL 0/0 1/3 N/A FAIL Tele2 (swip.net) FAIL FAIL 0/2 2/4 FAIL FAIL Telecom Bulgaria Ltd. (telecombulgaria.com) FAIL FAIL 0/0 0/1 N/A FAIL

Telecom Italia (telecomitalia.com) FAIL FAIL 0/0 0/2 N/A FAIL

Telecom Italia (telecomitalia.it) FAIL FAIL 0/1 0/2 N/A FAIL

Telefónica (telefonica.es) FAIL FAIL 0/0 0/2 N/A FAIL

Telefónica (telefonica.com) FAIL FAIL 0/0 0/2 N/A FAIL TeleFinland (tele.fi) FAIL FAIL 0/0 0/4 N/A FAIL Telefonica O2 Czech Republic (cz.o2.com) FAIL FAIL 0/0 0/2 N/A FAIL

Telekom Austria (telekom.at) www.v6 FAIL 0/3 0/3 N/A FAIL

Telekom Slovenije (telekom.si) FAIL FAIL 0/2 0/2 N/A FAIL

Telekomunikacja Polska (tp.pl) PROBLEM FAIL 0/0 3/3 FAIL FAIL

Telenor ASA (telenor.no) FAIL FAIL 0/0 0/2 N/A FAIL

TeliaSonera (teliasonera.com) FAIL FAIL 0/0 0/2 N/A FAIL

TeliaSonera (telia.se) FAIL FAIL 0/3 0/3 N/A FAIL TEO LT, AB (teo.lt) FAIL FAIL 0/0 0/2 N/A FAIL

Organisation (domain) Web Mail DNS NTP XMPP

AS Eesti Telekom (telekom.ee) FAIL FAIL 0/0 0/2 N/A FAIL

Belgacom Belgium (belgacom.be) FAIL FAIL 0/0 0/4 FAIL FAIL

BT (btplc.com) FAIL FAIL 0/0 0/3 N/A FAIL

BT (bt.com) FAIL FAIL 0/4 0/4 N/A FAIL

BTC Group (btc.bg) FAIL FAIL 0/0 0/3 N/A FAIL

Cable & Wireless PLC (cw.com) FAIL FAIL (M) 0/0 0/2 N/A FAIL

Cyta (Cyprus Telecom) (cyta.com.cy) FAIL FAIL 0/0 0/2 N/A FAIL

Deutsche Telekom AG (telekom.com) FAIL FAIL 0/0 0/3 N/A FAIL

Deutsche Telekom AG (dtag.de) FAIL FAIL 0/1 0/2 N/A FAIL

Eircom (eircom.ie) FAIL FAIL 0/3 0/3 N/A FAIL

Elisa Oyj (elisa.com) FAIL FAIL 0/0 0/2 N/A FAIL

Finnet Ltd (finnet.fi) FAIL FAIL 0/0 0/3 N/A FAIL

France Telecom (francetelecom.fr) FAIL FAIL 0/0 0/2 N/A FAIL

France Telecom (francetelecom.com) FAIL FAIL 0/0 0/2 N/A FAIL

France Telecom (orange.com) FAIL FAIL (M) 0/0 0/3 N/A FAIL

GO (go.com.mt) FAIL FAIL 0/0 0/1 N/A FAIL

KPN International (eu.net) SUCCESS FAIL 0/0 2/4 N/A FAIL

KPN International (kpn.com) FAIL FAIL 0/1 0/2 N/A FAIL

Lattelecom (lattelecom.lv) FAIL FAIL 0/0 0/2 N/A FAIL

Magyar Telecom (t-mobile) (telekom.hu) FAIL FAIL 0/0 0/2 Stratum 2 FAIL

Metrocom (metrocom.ru) FAIL FAIL 0/1 0/2 FAIL FAIL

Moldtelecom (moldtelecom.md) FAIL FAIL 0/3 0/3 FAIL FAIL

OpenTransit (opentransit.net) www.ipv6 FAIL 0/1 0/2 N/A FAIL

OTE S.A. (ote.gr) FAIL FAIL 0/1 0/3 N/A FAIL


Comparison: Phase-1 vs. Phase-2


Phase1 Trend


Phase1 by country


Phase-2 Trend


Phase-2(Core) by country


New Certification for IPv6 Services New Certification for IPv6 Services


Only Time Will Tell…