Integrated Computational and Experimental Studies of
Flapping-wing Micro Air Vehicle Aerodynamics
Kevin Knowles , Peter Wilkins, Salman Ansari, Rafal Zbikowski
Department of Aerospace, Power and SensorsCranfield University
Defence Academy of the UKShrivenham, England
3rd Int Symp on Integrating CFD and Experiments in Aerodynamics,
Colorado Springs, 2007
Knowles et al.
Outline
• Introduction• Flapping-Wing Problem• Aerodynamic Model• LEV stability• Conclusions
Knowles et al.
Micro Air Vehicles • Defined as small flying vehicles with
Size/Weight: 150-230mm/50–100gEndurance: 20–60min
• Reasons for MAVs:Existing UAVs limited by large sizeNiche exists for MAVs – e.g. indoor flight, low altitude, man-portable
• MAV Essential (Desirable) Attributes:High efficiency High manoeuvrability at low speedsVertical flight & hover capabilitySensor-carrying; autonomous(Stealthy; durable)
Microgyro
Microsensors
Knowles et al.
Why insect-like flapping? • Insects are more manoeuvrable• Power requirement:
Insect – 70 W/kg maximumBird – 80 W/kg minimumAeroplane – 150 W/kg
• Speeds:Insects ~ 7mphBirds ~ 15mph
Knowles et al.
Wing Kinematics – 1• Flapping Motion
sweepingheavingpitching
• Key PhasesTranslational
downstrokeupstroke
Knowles et al.
Wing Kinematics – 1• Flapping Motion
sweepingheavingpitching
• Key PhasesTranslational
downstrokeupstroke
Rotationalstroke reversalhigh angle of attack
Knowles et al.
Wing Kinematics – 2
Knowles et al.
Mechanical Implementation
Knowles et al.
Generic insect wing kinematicsThree important differences when compared
to conventional aircraft:wings stop and start during flightlarge wing-wake interactionshigh angle of attack (45° or more)
Complex kinematics:difficult to determine difficult to understand difficult to reproduce
Knowles et al.
Aerodynamics
• Key phenomenaunsteady aerodynamics
apparent massWagner effectreturning wake
leading-edge vortex
[Pho
to: P
rene
let a
l199
7]
Knowles et al.
Aerodynamic Modelling – 1• Quasi-3D Model
• 2-D blade elements withattached flowseparated flow
leading-edge vortextrailing-edge wake
• Convert to 3-Dradial chords
+
centre ofrotation
Robofly wing
Knowles et al.
Aerodynamic Modelling – 1• Quasi-3D Model
• 2-D blade elements withattached flowseparated flow
leading-edge vortextrailing-edge wake
• Convert to 3-Dradial chordscylindrical cross-planesintegrate along wing span
~
Φ
θ
ξ̂
η
η̂
ξ
η~
ξ
wing
ξ~
~ηη̂
η
ξ̂
ξ
Knowles et al.
Aerodynamic Modelling – 2• Model Summary
6 DOF kinematicscirculation-based approachinviscid model with viscosity introduced indirectlynumerical implementation by discrete vortex methodvalidated against experimental data
Wing Geometry
Flow
Moment DataForce and
Aerodynamic Model
Wing Kinematics Visualisation
Knowles et al.
Flow Visualisation Output
Knowles et al.
Impulsively-started plate
Knowles et al.
Validation of Model
Knowles et al.
The leading-edge vortex (LEV)Insect wings operate at high angles of attack (>45°), but no catastrophic stallInstead, stable, lift-enhancing (~80%) LEV createdFlapping wing MAVs (FMAVs) need to retain stable LEV for efficiencyWhy is the LEV stable? Is it due to a 3D effect?
Knowles et al.
2D flows at low Re
Re = 5
Knowles et al.
Influence of Reynolds number
α
= 45°
Knowles et al.
2D flows
Re = 500, α
= 45°
Knowles et al.
Influence of Reynolds number
α
= 45°
Knowles et al.
Kelvin-Helmholtz instability at Re > 1000
Re 500 Re 5000
Knowles et al.
Secondary vortices
Re = 1000 Re = 5000
Knowles et al.
2D LEV Stability
• For Re<25, vorticity is dissipated quickly and generated slowly – the LEV cannot grow large enough to become unstable
• For Re>25, vorticity is generated quickly and dissipated slowly – the LEV grows beyond a stable size
• In order to stabilise the LEV, vorticity must be extracted – spanwise flow is required for stability
Knowles et al.
Structure of 3D LEV
Knowles et al.
Stable 3D LEV
Re = 120
Re = 500
Knowles et al.
Conclusions• LEV is unstable for 2D flows except at very low Reynolds
numbers• Sweeping motion of 3D wing leads to conical LEV; leads
to spanwise flow which extracts vorticity from LEV core and stabilises LEV.
• 3D LEV stable & lift-enhancing at high Reynolds numbers (>10000) despite occurrence of Kelvin-Helmholtz instability.
Knowles et al.
Questions?
Top Related