Download - IMPACTS OF EARTHQUAKES ON WATER RESERVOIRS, PIPELINES, AQUEDUCTS, AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, University.

Transcript
  • IMPACTS OF EARTHQUAKES ONWATER RESERVOIRS, PIPELINES, AQUEDUCTS, AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS

    Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, University of North Carolina, USA

  • OVERVIEW OF EARTHQUAKE RISKWATER RESERVOIRS, PIPELINES, AQUEDUCTS, AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS FACE DIFFERENT RISKS FROM THE POTENTIAL DISASTER AGENTS OF EARTHQUAKES

  • WATER RESERVOIRS, PIPELINES, AQUEDUCTS, AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS Have POINT-SENSITIVE and AREA-SENSITIVE components, which have varying vulnerabilities when exposed to the TIME and SPACE- DEPENDENT potential disaster agents of EARTHQUAKES.

  • TIME HISTORY AND SPECTRUM

  • WATER,RESERV.,AQUEDUCTS, PIPELINES,, AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMSDATA BASES AND INFORMATIONHAZARDS: GROUND SHAKING GROUND FAILURE SURFACE FAULTING TECTONIC DEFORMATION TSUNAMI RUN UP AFTERSHOCKS

  • ELEMENTS OF UNACCEPTABLE RISKRISK

  • EARTHQUAKEHAZARD MODEL

  • THE BASIC FAULT MODELSStrike-SlipReverseNormal

  • EXPOSUREMODEL

  • VULNERABILITYMODEL

  • WATER RESERVOIRS, PIPELINES, AQUEDUCTS, AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS Vulnerability is a function of materials, age, maintenance, and the systems exposure as a site-specific, or a spatially- distributed above-or-below-ground system.

  • INTENSITYMEAN DAMAGE RATIO, % OF REPLACEMENT VALUECONSTRUCTION MATERIALS HAVE DIFFERENT VULNERABILITIES TO GROUND SHAKING

  • COMMENTS ON DAMAGEMMI VI DENOTES TO ONSET OF DAMAGE DUE TO LIQUEFACTION MMI VII DENOTES DAMAGE FROM CRACKING; APPROXIMATELY 12% gMMI VIII DENOTES SEVERE DAMAGE, TYPICALLY AT JOINTS OF PIPES; APPROXIMATELY 25 % gMMI IX DENOTES VERY HEAVY DAMAGE, MANY BREAKS/KM; 50 %^ g.

  • GROUNDSHAKING

  • INADEQUATE RESISTANCE TO HORIZONTAL GROUND SHAKINGEARTHQUAKESSOIL AMPLIFICATIONPERMANENT DISPLACEMENT (SURFACE FAULTING, LIQUE-FACTION & LANDSLIDES)IRREGULARITIES IN ELEVATION AND PLAN, AND [OOR ROUTE TSUNAMI IMPACTS

    POOR DETAILING AND WEAK CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS FRAGILITY OF NON-STRUCTURAL ELEMENTSCAUSES OF DAMAGEDISASTER LABORATORIES

  • EXAMPLES OF FAILURES (AND ALMOST FAILURES) IN PAST EARTHQUAKES

  • INADEQUATE SEISMIC DESIGN PROVISIONS (I.E., BUILDING CODES )MEAN 1) INADEQUATE RESISTANCE TO HORIZONTAL GROUND SHAKING2) COLLAPSE AND FAILURE OF ABOVE-GROUND SYSTEMS

  • UNDERGROUND PIPELINES AND DISTRIB-UTION SYSTEMS NEED PROTECTION A UTILITY CORRIDOR IS VULNERABLE TO LOSS OF FUNCTION WHEN IT IS ROUTED THROUGH SOILS THAT ARE SUSCEPTIBLE TO LIQUEFACTION. (USA 1995)

  • INADEQUATE SEISMIC DESIGN PROVISIONS (I.E., WATER SYSTEM STANDARDS) AND THE ROUTING)MEAN 1) SUSCEPTIBILITY TO PERMANENT GROUND FAILURE (LIQUEFACTION, LANDSLIDES), 2) FAILURE OF BELOW-GROUND SYSTEMS

  • ABOVE-GROUND SYSTEMS NEED PROTECTION FROM LANDSLIDES RESEVOIRS ARE SUSCEPTIBLE TO LANDSLIDES INDUCED BY EARTHQUAKES. (CHINA 2008)

  • AQUEDUCTS: ABOVE-GROUND SYSTEMS THAT CARRY WATER FROM A TO B AQUEDUCTS ARE SUSCEPTIBLE TO LANDSLIDES INDUCED BY EARTHQUAKES. (ARIZONA);

  • AQUEDUCTS: ABOVE-GROUND SYSTEMS THAT CARRY WATER FROM A TO B ELEVATED AQUEDUCTS ARE VERY SUSCEPTIBLE TO GROUND SHAKING.

  • CHINA 2008: RESERVOIRS NEED PROTECTION IN AN EARTHQUAKE

  • JAPAN 2011: ABOVE GROUND SYSTEMS NEED PROTECTION IN AN EARTHQUAKE

  • SICHUAN, CHINA: ABOVE GROUND SYSTEMS NEED PROTECTION

  • HAITI 2010: ABOVE-GROUND SYSTEMS NEED PROTECTION

  • TURKEY 2010: ABOVE GROUND SYSTEMS NEED PROTECTION

  • KEY CONSIDERATIONS FOR PROTECTIVE DESIGN AND SMART ROUTING WATER RESERVOIRS, PIPELINES, AQUEDUCTS, AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS

  • WATER RESERVOIRS, PIPELINES, AQUEDUCTS, AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS Above-ground siting makes water- reservoirs and aqueducts more vulnerable to earthquake ground shaking than the buried pipelines and distribution systems are.

  • EARTHQUAKE SCENARIOSA DISASTER RISK ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUE FOR USE IN AN EARTHQUAKE-PRONE AREA

  • DESIGN SCENARIOS Distributed Systems: The risks need to be assessed in terms of regional ground shaking and ground failure maps; ---Non-distributed systems: Assess risks in terms of site-specific criteria.

  • EXAMPLE: PROBABILISTIC GROUND SHAKING HAZARD MAPSPGA: 10 % P(EXCEEDANCE) IN 50 YEARSSOURCEGLOBAL SEISMIC HAZARD ASSESSMENT PROGRAMUS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

  • A probabilistic ground shaking hazard map integrates physical properties determined from geology, geophysics, and seismology in a consistent way to define:Seismic source zonesRegional seismic wave attenuation rates

  • Seismic Source Zones: Each zone has its own unique spatial and temporal distribution of faults, magnitudes and recurrence intervals. Regional Seismic Attenuation Rates: seismic waves decay more rapidly near a plate boundary than far from the boundary.

  • GROUND SHAKING HAZARD ASSESSMENT

  • Each map shows relative levels of the ground shaking hazard on a small scale in terms of the mapping parameter: peak ground acceleration (and sometimes MMI).

  • PEAK GROUND ACCELERATION Peak ground acceleration correlates best with the short-period asymptote of the response spectrum, and is related to how a short waste water facility would respond to ground shaking.

  • The maps are most useful for small-scale applications such as comparison of the relative ground shaking hazard between the end-points of a long, distributed water pipeline system.

  • The mapping parameter, peak ground acceleration, is not as good a descriptor of how the ground actually shakes as is a time historyThe response spectrum of a time history is an approximation of how a water system element might respond to ground shaking of a certain period.

  • The regional-scale peak ground acceleration maps are not appropriate for site-specific design.

  • Regional maps do not incorporate information on soil properties (e.g., shear wave velocity; data related to liquefaction; slope stability).Soils data require sampling and mapping on a larger scale.

  • http://www.seismo.ethz.ch/gshap/eastasia/PGA SCALE FOR MAPSAfghanistan

  • RISK ASSESSMENT LEAD TO POLICY IMPLEMENTATION

    More lectures at Disasters Supercourse - http://www.pitt.edu/~super1/collections/collection52.htm*****Three types of faultsForm depending on type of plate motion and complex reaction of earths lithospheric blocksStrike-slipNormalThrust

    *******This is the GSHAP seismic hazard map for east Asia. We can see how the earthquake problem in Afghanistan is shared with neighboring countries.*