IACC Sweeps 2005Discussion Template
Helen Chu, Joe Grimes, Franz Kurfess, Craig SchultzTemplate v.1:: 03/09/05
E=Exceeds expectations :: M=Meets expectations :: D=Does not meet expectations :: 1=High priority :: 5=Low Priority
Status
Progress
Priority
Framework, Process, Timelines
Framework of IACC Sweeps: Evolution of committee, understanding of complex resource constraints and college requirements encourages a refined approach this year.
Process: establish common themes and work collaboratively to reduce overlap; college-specific requirements continue to be articulated in IACC Sweeps.
Timelines: the collaborative approach or college “one-by-one” approach is key factor in preparation time and logistics for successful IACC Sweeps.
-
-
-
E=Exceeds expectations :: M=Meets expectations :: D=Does not meet expectations :: 1=High priority :: 5=Low Priority
Status
Progress
Priority
Overall Categories
Communication Resources Infrastructure Support Outside Organizations Strategic Planning & Policy-
-
-
E=Exceeds expectations :: M=Meets expectations :: D=Does not meet expectations :: 1=High priority :: 5=Low Priority
Status
Progress
Priority
Communication Mode and Format
Email, Portal Channels, Phone, Paper Recipients
Faculty, Staff, Students Specific Groups (system users, affected)
Timing upon detection (right after a problem has
been noted) upon resolution determined by urgency, impact
-
-
-
E=Exceeds expectations :: M=Meets expectations :: D=Does not meet expectations :: 1=High priority :: 5=Low Priority
Status
Progress
Priority
Resources People/Time Workstation Program
overall funding refresh cycle selection of models flexibility in usage of funds
Lab Equipment overall funding refresh cycle
Software (KeyServer model, etc.) Classrooms / Learning Spaces Innovation / Other Teaching & Learning Resources
PRS (clickers) Utilities bordering on infrastructure
-
-
-
E=Exceeds expectations :: M=Meets expectations :: D=Does not meet expectations :: 1=High priority :: 5=Low Priority
Status
Progress
Priority
Infrastructure
Facilities Classrooms / Smart Rooms
Services Access Mobility
Wireless-
-
-
E=Exceeds expectations :: M=Meets expectations :: D=Does not meet expectations :: 1=High priority :: 5=Low Priority
Status
Progress
Priority
Support Administration
Student Administration (CMS) Poly Progress, Degree Progress
Business Processes Teaching and Learning
Media Services Learning Management Systems Faculty Development
Services Desk (Require clarification of this category
from Communications?)
-
-
-
E=Exceeds expectations :: M=Meets expectations :: D=Does not meet expectations :: 1=High priority :: 5=Low Priority
Status
Progress
Priority
Collaboration with Outside Organizations
CSU UC
UCSB Joint Doctoral Program UCD Equine Program
Community Colleges High Schools I2, Cenic Vendors
-
-
-
E=Exceeds expectations :: M=Meets expectations :: D=Does not meet expectations :: 1=High priority :: 5=Low Priority
Status
Progress
Priority
-
-
-
Strategic Planning & Policy Forward-looking challenges that impact faculty,
teaching and learning Learning Management System and similar long-term
planning issues document and knowledge repository
vision, strategy for using demographics, institutional memory, transitions as
people retire ADA Information Competence Visioning (Access, Integration, Simplicity – see IACC
Web site) Access & Security Instructional Technology Spaces
E=Exceeds expectations :: M=Meets expectations :: D=Does not meet expectations :: 1=High priority :: 5=Low Priority
Status
Progress
Priority
LegendSTATUS SCORE
E = Exceeds, M = Meets Expectations (Fully
or Partially) D = Does Not Meet Expectations - = Not Applicable
PROGRESS SCORE(Same as above)
PRIORITY: 1 High Priority…5 Low Priority
E=Exceeds expectations :: M=Meets expectations :: D=Does not meet expectations :: 1=High priority :: 5=Low Priority
Status
Progress
Priority
GroupsTopic Leader Members
Communication
Pat Mc QuaidJoe Grimes
Resources
Infrastructure
Support
Outside Organizations
Strategic Issues
E=Exceeds expectations :: M=Meets expectations :: D=Does not meet expectations :: 1=High priority :: 5=Low Priority
Status
Progress
Priority
Instructions Topics will be listed in the main
text area Subtopics will also be listed in this
area Multiple subtopics are acceptable –
like last year. Status, progress & priority scores
for each topic follow the topic Overall status, Progress &
Priority scores (average of each) goes into lower left corner
-
-
-
E=Exceeds expectations :: M=Meets expectations :: D=Does not meet expectations :: 1=High priority :: 5=Low Priority
Status
Progress
Priority
Example: Support meet casual user requirements D, M, 1
timely and accurate information D, E, 1 problems, system status
service desk/remedy encourage colleges/departments to use remedy
E, E, 4 gather feedback from users several months after
using the service -, -,2
create technology tab in portal M, E, 1 purchasing channel
TII – status update E, E, 2 good and bad experiences flexibility for faculty requirements
-
-
-
Top Related