8/10/2019 Higher Education, IT, and Public Policy (243364645)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/higher-education-it-and-public-policy-243364645 1/30
Higher Education, IT, and
Public Policy
October 1, 2014
Jarret Cummings, Josh Ulman, and Jennifer Ortega
8/10/2019 Higher Education, IT, and Public Policy (243364645)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/higher-education-it-and-public-policy-243364645 2/30
8/10/2019 Higher Education, IT, and Public Policy (243364645)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/higher-education-it-and-public-policy-243364645 3/30
Major Policy Areas
Cybersecurity and data privacy
E-Learning (including accessibility)
Copyright (e.g., Digital Millennium
Copyright Act, or DMCA)
Telecommunications
8/10/2019 Higher Education, IT, and Public Policy (243364645)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/higher-education-it-and-public-policy-243364645 4/30
Key Issues in 2014
Network Neutrality
TEACH Act (IT Accessibility)
Network Funding/Porn Filtering Provision
State Authorization for Distance
Education
DMCA Notice-and-Takedown Process
8/10/2019 Higher Education, IT, and Public Policy (243364645)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/higher-education-it-and-public-policy-243364645 5/30
Federal Communications Commission to Reinstate Open Internet RulesNetwork Neutrality
8/10/2019 Higher Education, IT, and Public Policy (243364645)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/higher-education-it-and-public-policy-243364645 6/30
The Basics
2010 Open Internet Order
No blocking
No discrimination (e.g., paid prioritization)
Transparency in network management
January 2014: 2010 Order Struck Down
No blocking, discrimination rules vacated –
too much like common carrier
Transparency rule upheld
May 2014: FCC votes to establish new rules
consistent with court’s findings
8/10/2019 Higher Education, IT, and Public Policy (243364645)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/higher-education-it-and-public-policy-243364645 7/30
The Basics
FCC Notice of Proposed Rule-Makingpresents initial proposals, questions for input
Legal authority: Section 706 of the
Telecommunications Act of 1996
FCC authority to drive broadband development
Key argument: “Virtuous cycle of innovation”
Enhanced transparency rule
More and clearer disclosures
Focus on network management practices,
scope and quality of services
8/10/2019 Higher Education, IT, and Public Policy (243364645)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/higher-education-it-and-public-policy-243364645 8/30
The Basics
No blocking rule
Some ISP/edge provider negotiation
Based on minimum service level,
“commercially reasonable” practices
Replace “no discrimination” rule Allow some individualized negotiation
Bounded by “commercially reasonable” practices
“Commercially reasonable” standard No practices that threaten “Internet openness”
Clearly defined factors identifying what would
negatively impact “Internet openness”
8/10/2019 Higher Education, IT, and Public Policy (243364645)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/higher-education-it-and-public-policy-243364645 9/30
EDUCAUSE in Action
Partnered with ARL and ALA; later joined by AAU, ACE, APLU, and others
Met with FCC on NPRM proposals’ impact
on higher education and libraries
Filed principles, comments, reply comments
on net neutrality’s importance
10 associations signed onto the principles
11 joined the comments, with 3 moreendorsing thru reply comments
12 signed onto reply comments
8/10/2019 Higher Education, IT, and Public Policy (243364645)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/higher-education-it-and-public-policy-243364645 10/30
EDUCAUSE in Action
Key positions No paid prioritization, degradation,
blocking
“Internet reasonable” standard todetermine if ISP practices violate rules
Support FCC’s continuing distinction
between public and private networks Equal application of rules to both mobile
and fixed Internet access services
8/10/2019 Higher Education, IT, and Public Policy (243364645)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/higher-education-it-and-public-policy-243364645 11/30
Looking Ahead
FCC received 3.7 million comments Vast majority want stronger no blocking, no
discrimination than initial FCC proposals
Great concern about paid prioritization Public roundtables thru next week –
EDUCAUSE panelist on legal roundtable
FCC wants to publish final rules by the endof the year
8/10/2019 Higher Education, IT, and Public Policy (243364645)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/higher-education-it-and-public-policy-243364645 12/30
Legislation in Congress to Regulate Accessibility of Technology in Higher EdTEACH Act (IT Accessibility)
8/10/2019 Higher Education, IT, and Public Policy (243364645)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/higher-education-it-and-public-policy-243364645 13/30
The Basics
Goal: Ensure digital instructional materials,related technologies are accessible
Charge the U.S. Access Board to develop
voluntary “safe harbor” guidelines
Can use non-compliant materials/IT if
“equally effective, equally integrated, with
substantially equivalent ease of use”
Similar text in HEA reauthorization draft bill
introduced by Sen. Harkin (D-IA)
8/10/2019 Higher Education, IT, and Public Policy (243364645)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/higher-education-it-and-public-policy-243364645 14/30
Supporters
National Federation of the Blind and Association of American Publishers
Originally sponsored in House by Rep. Petri
(R-WI); now has 51 cosponsors Senators Hatch (R-UT) and Warren (D-MA)
introduced Senate companion; now has 4
cosponsors
8/10/2019 Higher Education, IT, and Public Policy (243364645)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/higher-education-it-and-public-policy-243364645 15/30
Concerns
EDUCAUSE supports improving instructional
materials/technologies accessibility
This bill is not the answer
U.S. Access Board:
No higher education expertise
No update in federal IT guidelines since 2000
Can’t always meet TEACH standard, and no
flexibility = lawsuits or outdated guidelines?
Chilling effect on higher education IT/
innovation (including accessibility)
8/10/2019 Higher Education, IT, and Public Policy (243364645)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/higher-education-it-and-public-policy-243364645 16/30
The Debate
ACE, EDUCAUSE, 18 others submit jointHEA discussion draft comments
NFB:
Asserts brief remarks on TEACH section =higher education dismisses issue
Publishes highly critical blog post, op-eds
against ACE Claims TEACH reflects current law, creates
voluntary “safe harbor” guidelines
8/10/2019 Higher Education, IT, and Public Policy (243364645)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/higher-education-it-and-public-policy-243364645 17/30
EDUCAUSE in Action
ACE/EDUCAUSE Inside Higher Ed op-ed onposition (also ACE “letter(s) to the editor”)
Higher education TEACH analysis posted
online; shows disconnects with current law Actively informing Congress of concerns on
TEACH and HEA reauthorization
Working on alternatives for Congress toconsider; ready to work with NFB on process
8/10/2019 Higher Education, IT, and Public Policy (243364645)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/higher-education-it-and-public-policy-243364645 18/30
Appropriations Committees Aim to Block Federally-Funded Research Projects
Involving Access to Porn
Porn Rider in the Appropriations Process
8/10/2019 Higher Education, IT, and Public Policy (243364645)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/higher-education-it-and-public-policy-243364645 19/30
The Basics
2014 Appropriations bill provision:SEC. 528. (a) None of the funds made available in this Act may be
used to maintain or establish a computer network unless such network
blocks the viewing, downloading, and exchanging of pornography.
(b) Nothing in subsection (a) shall limit the use of funds necessary for
any Federal, State, tribal, or local law enforcement agency or any other
entity carrying out criminal investigations, prosecution, or adjudication
activities.
Agencies prohibited from using federal funds to
maintain or establish networks unless theyblock access to pornography
8/10/2019 Higher Education, IT, and Public Policy (243364645)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/higher-education-it-and-public-policy-243364645 20/30
The Basics
Provision included in the 2014
Appropriations packages for:
Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related
Agencies
Department of Homeland Security
Departments of Labor, Health and Human
Services, and Education, and Related
Agencies
Military Construction and Veterans Affairs,
and Related Agencies
8/10/2019 Higher Education, IT, and Public Policy (243364645)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/higher-education-it-and-public-policy-243364645 21/30
EDUCAUSE in Action
NIH released a notice alerting awardrecipients about provision
EDUCAUSE contacted congressional,
association, agency sources on scope NIH: Provision only applies to funds directly
awarded for establishing/managing networks
Would not include overhead funds
NIH stated it would contact affected grantees
and contractors directly
8/10/2019 Higher Education, IT, and Public Policy (243364645)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/higher-education-it-and-public-policy-243364645 22/30
Current State of Affairs
No implementation requirements orcompliance issues from any other
department or agency
Some departments have had the provisionattached to their appropriations for at least
the last two fiscal years
Continue to monitor in case substantiveconcerns emerge down the road
8/10/2019 Higher Education, IT, and Public Policy (243364645)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/higher-education-it-and-public-policy-243364645 23/30
Education Department Tries to Regulate the State Authorization Process for
Distance Education Programs
State Authorization for Distance Education
8/10/2019 Higher Education, IT, and Public Policy (243364645)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/higher-education-it-and-public-policy-243364645 24/30
The Basics
2010: Dept. of Education (ED) rule—distanceeducation providers need state authorization
in each state in which they operate
2012: Rule struck down by federal appealscourt
Feb 2014: ED negotiated rule-making on
student aid regulations, including distance
education state authorization
April 2014: ED released its draft proposal
8/10/2019 Higher Education, IT, and Public Policy (243364645)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/higher-education-it-and-public-policy-243364645 25/30
The Proposal No exemptions based on accreditation, years of
service, or other “comparable exemptions”
To exempt providers, states must implement a
complaint process, and review:
fiscal viability, refund policy, programs offered, tuition andfees, complaint process, and history
Regulation triggered if >30 students will complete at
least 50% of degree via distance education
Student notification mandated if licensure programwould not meet state licensure requirements
Exemption for active military and their families
8/10/2019 Higher Education, IT, and Public Policy (243364645)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/higher-education-it-and-public-policy-243364645 26/30
Education Department on its Own
Panel voted down the proposal in May,allowing ED to draft a new rule on its own
Expected to include language from ED’s
original draft proposal WCET, UPCEA, and the Online Learning
Consortium (aka Sloan-C) submitted a letter
to ED on draft proposal concerns ED attempting to release final regulations at
the end of October
8/10/2019 Higher Education, IT, and Public Policy (243364645)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/higher-education-it-and-public-policy-243364645 27/30
8/10/2019 Higher Education, IT, and Public Policy (243364645)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/higher-education-it-and-public-policy-243364645 28/30
The Basics
USPTO and NTIA began a multi-stakeholder process
Focus: Voluntary improvements to DMCA
notice-and-takedown procedures
Held a series of stakeholder forums on
simplifying the process
Working on a voluntary, standardized
takedown notice
8/10/2019 Higher Education, IT, and Public Policy (243364645)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/higher-education-it-and-public-policy-243364645 29/30
EDUCAUSE in Action
Analyzed first forum transcript
Recruited member observers to attend
second forum
Determined that process did not have
implications for higher education
Continue to monitor process for shifts
that might raise community concerns
8/10/2019 Higher Education, IT, and Public Policy (243364645)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/higher-education-it-and-public-policy-243364645 30/30
Questions? Contact us:
Jarret Cummings
Josh Ulman [email protected]
Jennifer Ortega [email protected]
Top Related