Download - HIGH RATE BEHAVIOUR AND DISCHARGE LIMITS IN MICRO-PATTERN DETECTORS A. Bressan, M. Hoch, P. Pagano, L. Ropelewski and F. Sauli (CERN, Geneva, Switzerland)

Transcript

HIGH RATE BEHAVIOUR AND DISCHARGE LIMITSIN MICRO-PATTERN

DETECTORS

A. Bressan, M. Hoch, P. Pagano, L. Ropelewski and F. Sauli(CERN, Geneva, Switzerland)

S. Biagi(Univ. Liverpool)A. Buzulutskov

(Budker Institute for Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk, Russia)M. Gruwé

(DESY-Univ. Hamburg, Germany)G. De Lentdecker

(ULB Bruxelles, Belgium)D. Moermann

(Univ. Karlsruhe, Germany)A. Sharma

(GSI Darmsdtadt, Germany)

Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 424 (1999) 321- 342

Presented by Gabriele Croci (CERN-GDD Group)

RD51 Working Group 2 Meeting – December the 10th - CERN

Gabriele Croci - RD51 WG2 Meeting - December the 10th 2008 - CERN 2

GOAL• Measure the maximum gain of gaseous

proportional micropattern detectors when irradiated with high-rate soft X-Rays and heavely ionizing alpha particles

List of MPGD Tested:

• Micro-strips

• Micromegas

• Micro-dot

• Gas electron multiplier (GEM)

• Micro-CAT or Well

Gabriele Croci - RD51 WG2 Meeting - December the 10th 2008 - CERN 3

Discharges in MPGD

High irradiation rate and/or exposure to heavily ionizing tracks can induce transitions from proportional avalanche to streamer probably followed by a discharge (harmful and fatal for the electronics)

High electric field present in a large fraction or all gaps between anode and cathode. The field is not uniform and it

is higher at the metal/dielectric boundaries

GEM

y

x

y = 25 µm

Gabriele Croci - RD51 WG2 Meeting - December the 10th 2008 - CERN 4

Experimental Setup and Procedures

• All measurements on variuos kinds of detector performed in identical conditions (as far as possible)

• The most appopriate gas used for each detector

1. Absolute gain calibration: different gain G = Ia/(R*np*e)

recorded for different operating voltages (anodic Ia

current measurement)

2. Full volume detector irradiation: For each setting of the X-rays flux, the voltage is increased until reaching instabilities or discharges

3. Exposure to heavily ionizing particles

Gabriele Croci - RD51 WG2 Meeting - December the 10th 2008 - CERN 5

Ways of discharges development in MPGDs

• Spontaneous breakdown in absence of radiation: geometry and position-linked (essential role of quality and local defects)

• Rate-induced breakdown: reduction of the maximum operating voltage

• Heavily ionizing tracks exposure: considerable decrease of the maximum safe operating voltage

Spontaneous breakdown in absence of radiation

Gabriele Croci - RD51 WG2 Meeting - December the 10th 2008 - CERN 6

The performance of the whole detector is determined by the intrinsic defects of the worst group

Rate-induced breakdown

Gabriele Croci - RD51 WG2 Meeting - December the 10th 2008 - CERN 7

Paulo Fonte “The physics of streamer and discharges”; 2nd RD51 Collaboration meeting Paris 13-15 October 2008

Gabriele Croci - RD51 WG2 Meeting - December the 10th 2008 - CERN 8

Exposure to heavily ionizing particles

The gas flow is open to a bypass containing a thorium oxide compound. The mixture is enriched with radon whose main decay mode produces 6.4 MeV α particles

Measurements of discharge rate.

A discharge is defined as an event causing an overload of the current-limited power supplies set at a threshold of about ten times the average normal current

Discharge probability: fraction of signals with exceedingly large amplitude normalized to alpha flux

Gabriele Croci - RD51 WG2 Meeting - December the 10th 2008 - CERN 9

Detectors experimental results (1)Standard MSGC Micromegas

Gabriele Croci - RD51 WG2 Meeting - December the 10th 2008 - CERN 10

Detectors experimental results (2)

Standard GEM Conical GEM

Gabriele Croci - RD51 WG2 Meeting - December the 10th 2008 - CERN 11

Detectors experimental results (3)

Microcat/WELL Microdot

Gabriele Croci - RD51 WG2 Meeting - December the 10th 2008 - CERN 12

Detectors experimental results (4)Standard MSGC + Standard GEM Double GEM

Gabriele Croci - RD51 WG2 Meeting - December the 10th 2008 - CERN 13

SummaryDetector Gain without α’s

irradiation (Max Voltage)

Maximum Gain before disch* in presence of α’s (Dischage limit**)

Stand. MSGC 5000 (590) 2000 (550)

Micromegas 4*104 (470) 3000 (385)

Stand. GEM 5000 (540) 1500 (485)

Conical GEM NW: 2500 (600)

WN: 3000 (660)

NW: 1500 (570)

WN: 2000 (640)

Microcat/Well 6000 (540) 1500 (490)

Microdot 104 (580) 104 (580)St MSGC+St GEM (ΔVGEM = 400 V)

2*105 (Vc=625) 104 (Vc=450)

Double GEM(ΔVGEM2= 400 V)

104 (ΔVGEM1= 460) 104 (ΔVGEM1= 460)

* (**) Gain (Voltage) just below the first non zero discharge probability

Detector experimental results: GEM (1)

Gabriele Croci - RD51 WG2 Meeting - December the 10th 2008 - CERN 14

Gain and discharge probability on irradiation with alpha particles for the single, double and triple GEM

Detector experimental results: Sectored 10x10 cm2 GEM

Gabriele Croci - RD51 WG2 Meeting - December the 10th 2008 - CERN 15

Resistor partition network used to power a sectored GEM

Discharge signals on anodes for increasing GEM capacitance, obtained by grouping one to four sectors.0

Discharge propagation probability as a function of induction field fora sectored GEM.

S. Bachman et al, Discharge studies and prevention in the gas electron multiplier (GEM), Nucl. Instrum. Methods A479(2002)294

Gabriele Croci - RD51 WG2 Meeting - December the 10th 2008 - CERN 16

Conclusions (1)

• The difference in max gain reached in a low irradiation environment shown by different single stage devices tends to vanish in presence of heavily ionizing particles.

• In this conditions all single stage devices but microdot shown a non-negligeble probability of transition from avalanche to streamer at gain between 1000 and 3000

• This transition begin to occur when the average avalanche size exceeds 2-3 107 electrons (close Raether limit)

Gabriele Croci - RD51 WG2 Meeting - December the 10th 2008 - CERN 17

Conclusions (2)

• Sharing the amplification results in a shift upwards by at least an order of magnitude of the maximum gain

This may be explained by:– Field strength dependence of Raether limit

(higher for lower electric field)– Reduction of charge density induced by

additional spread due to diffusion in double devices