Download - Health and Consumers Health and Consumers NAS Network feedback on reference document "Objectives and Indicators" MANCP Network meeting FVO, Grange 25-26.

Transcript
Page 1: Health and Consumers Health and Consumers NAS Network feedback on reference document "Objectives and Indicators" MANCP Network meeting FVO, Grange 25-26.

Health andConsumers

NAS Network feedback on reference document

"Objectives and Indicators"

MANCP Network meetingFVO, Grange

25-26 November 2014

Page 2: Health and Consumers Health and Consumers NAS Network feedback on reference document "Objectives and Indicators" MANCP Network meeting FVO, Grange 25-26.

Health andConsumers

In plenary, members analysed the document "Objectives and Indicators", Version 1, Revision 5 of 15/07/2014Replied to three questions:1.Is the document useful for NAS auditors?2.Is the approach followed for the structure of the document adequate?3.What can be improved?

NAS Network meeting of 24-25/09/2014

Page 3: Health and Consumers Health and Consumers NAS Network feedback on reference document "Objectives and Indicators" MANCP Network meeting FVO, Grange 25-26.

Health andConsumers

• Auditors don’t write the MANCP but if people who write the MANCP follow the reference document then it will be more easily audited.

• Yes, it is useful but if it is to be used in an audit context it needs an annex with specific examples (e.g. validation of indicators).

• Provides important background information on “objectives and indicators” in the MANCP context.

Is the document useful for NAS auditors?

Page 4: Health and Consumers Health and Consumers NAS Network feedback on reference document "Objectives and Indicators" MANCP Network meeting FVO, Grange 25-26.

Health andConsumers

• Helps an auditor understand the auditees’ intention and direction of their control systems and how they define objectives and indicators (common terminology), but is not a tool for audit performance.

• Encourages MS to have objectives and indicators and is a good reference for CAs that have to design systems.

• Not relevant for audits directly but allows understanding of how indicators are developed/created.

Is the document useful for NAS auditors?

Page 5: Health and Consumers Health and Consumers NAS Network feedback on reference document "Objectives and Indicators" MANCP Network meeting FVO, Grange 25-26.

Health andConsumers

• Outcome of the use of the reference document is useful for the auditors (useful for improving the MANCP).

• More useful for management level, but still useful for auditors as a background.

• It needs to be completed with national audit instructions and translated into MS languages.

Is the document useful for NAS auditors?

Page 6: Health and Consumers Health and Consumers NAS Network feedback on reference document "Objectives and Indicators" MANCP Network meeting FVO, Grange 25-26.

Health andConsumers

• In general yes. The parts “purpose and use” and “characteristics” (although the acronym RACER was new for some participants) are useful. The part “principles” is confusing.

• Does the scope include “fraud” too? (Example on Annex 1.2).

• More effective to have objectives and indicators together in one reference document.

Is the approach followed for the structure of the document adequate?

Page 7: Health and Consumers Health and Consumers NAS Network feedback on reference document "Objectives and Indicators" MANCP Network meeting FVO, Grange 25-26.

Health andConsumers

• Impact of indicators in terms of behaviour/risk management needs to be highlighted.

• Needs to be included in the wider context of the purpose of the MANCP.

• Structure and logics are adequate but the diagrams need more explanations (for instance diagram 2 and its legend).

Is the approach followed for the structure of the document adequate?

Page 8: Health and Consumers Health and Consumers NAS Network feedback on reference document "Objectives and Indicators" MANCP Network meeting FVO, Grange 25-26.

Health andConsumers

• Strategic objectives cannot be SMART. On the other hand, operational objectives are easier to fit in the SMART characteristics. A hierarchy of objectives should be defined, where indicators are linked specifically with operational objectives.

• Part “Types and Examples” could be clearer and include more examples.

• A procedure for acceptance of objectives and indicators is missing (top-down, down-up).

• Better examples linked with diagram 2.

What can be improved?

Page 9: Health and Consumers Health and Consumers NAS Network feedback on reference document "Objectives and Indicators" MANCP Network meeting FVO, Grange 25-26.

Health andConsumers

• More diverse examples (quantitative and qualitative indicators).

• In the definition of indicators change “tool” to “feature”.

• Title of the document doesn’t reflect content.• Reference to “Effectiveness” reference document –

link the two documents.• Examples in annexes could be further developed

(bearing in mind that examples for each sector could undermine a final agreement on the reference document).

What can be improved?

Page 10: Health and Consumers Health and Consumers NAS Network feedback on reference document "Objectives and Indicators" MANCP Network meeting FVO, Grange 25-26.

Health andConsumers

• Keep the categorisation of indicators in the definitions - “output”, “outcome” and “impact” indicators.

• Clarify the part “principles”.• Include a methodology to build a good indicator (use

a diagram?)• Change title of the document – “Principles for

objectives and indicators and good practice”.• Add examples of key indicators.• Prescriptive indicators – list of indicators that could be

used by all MS?

What can be improved?

Page 11: Health and Consumers Health and Consumers NAS Network feedback on reference document "Objectives and Indicators" MANCP Network meeting FVO, Grange 25-26.

Health andConsumers

Thank you!

Unit F7Operational and Administrative services

European CommissionFood and Veterinary Office

Grange, Dunsany, Co. Meath, Ireland