·- I ,
BEFORE THE DIVISION OF MEDICAL QUALITY
MEDICAL BOARD OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of the Accusation Against:
GLENN E. MILLER, M.D. Certificate No. G-54401
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
No: 05-1996-67903
Respondent )
DECISION
The attached Stipulated Settlement and Disciplinary Order is hereby adopted by the Division
of Medical Quality as its Decision in the above-entitled matter.
This Decision shall become effective at 5:00 p.m. on July 1. 2002
IT IS SO ORDERED May 30, 2002
By: ~LJ4~\ RO ALDWENDER,M.D. Chair - Panel B Division of Medical Quality
1 BILL LOCKYER, Attorney General of the State of California
2 TAYLOR SCHNEIDER, StateBarNo. 91232 Deputy Attorney General
3 California Department of Justice 300 South Spring Street, Suite 1702
4 Los Angeles, California 90013 Telephone: (213) 897-2687
5 Facsimile (213) 897-1071
6 Attorneys for Complainant
7
8
9
BEFORE THE
10
11
DIVISION OF MEDICAL QUALITY MEDICAL BOARD OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA
12 In the Matter of the Accusation Against: MBC Case No. 05-96-67903 OAHNo. L-1999080353
l3 GLENN E. MILLER, M.D. 1335 State Street
14 Santa Barbara, CA 93101 STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AND DISCIPLINARY ORDER
15 Physician's and Surgeon's Certificate No. G 54401
16
17
18
Respondent.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties to the
19 above-entitled proceedings, as follows:
20
21
PARTIES
1. Ron Joseph ("complainant") is the Executive Director of the Medical
22 Board of California ("Board"). Complainant brought this action solely in his official capacity and is
23 represented in this matter by Bill Lockyer, Attorney General of the State of California, by Taylor
24 Schneider, Deputy Attorney General.
25 2. Glenn E. Miller, M.D. ("respondent") is represented in this proceeding by
26 attorney Mark A. Levin, Esq., of the Law Offices of Lewin & Levin, 11377 West Olympic
27 Boulevard, Fifth Floor, Los Angeles, California 90064
28
1 3. On or about March 11, 1985, the Board issued Physician's and Surgeon's
2 Certificate No. G 54401 to respondent. Physician and Surgeon's Certificate No. G54401 was in full
3 force and effect at all times relevant to the charges brought herein and, unless renewed, will expire
4 on May 31, 2002.
5 JURISDICTION
6 4. Accusation No. 05-96-67903 was filed before the Board's Division of Medical
7 Quality ("Division"), and is currently pending against respondent. The Accusation, together with all
8 other statutorily required documents, were duly served on respondent on December 14, 1998, and
9 respondent timely filed his Notice of Defense contesting the Accusation. The Accusation was
10 amended by stipulation on or about April 5, 2000. A copy of Amended Accusation No.
11 05-96-67903 is attached as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference.
12 ADVISEMENT AND WAIVERS
13 5. Respondent has carefully read and thoroughly discussed with his counsel the
14 nature of the charges and allegations in the Amended Accusation and the effects of this Stipulated
15 Settlement and Disciplinary Order.
16 6. Respondent is fully aware of his legal rights in this matter, including the right to
17 a hearing on the charges and allegations in the Amended Accusation, the right to be represented by
18 counsel at his own expense, the right to confront and cross-examine the witnesses against him, the
19 right to present evidence and to testify on his own behalf, the right to the issuance of subpoenas to
20 compel the attendance of witnesses and the production of documents, the right to reconsideration and
21 court review of an adverse decision, and all other rights accorded by the California Administrative
22 Procedure Act and other applicable laws.
23 7. Respondent voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently waives and gives up each
24 and every right set forth above.
25 CULP ABILITY
26 8. Respondent admits, as to each and every charge and allegation in the Amended
27 Accusation, that ifthe Board were to proceed with this case at a hearing, the Board would be able to
28
2
1 make a prima facie case on every charge and allegation, thereby constituting cause for imposing
2 discipline upon his Physician's and Surgeon's Certificate.
3 9. Respondent and his attorney agree that the Division has jurisdiction in this
4 matter to impose the following Order. To resolve this matter and to eliminate further proceedings
5 and the expense associated therewith in connection with the Amended Accusation, respondent agrees
6 to be bound by the Division's imposition of discipline as set forth in the Order below.
7 CONTINGENCY
8 10. This Stipulated Settlement and Disciplinary Order shall be subject to the
9 approval of the Division. Respondent understands and agrees that Board staff and counsel for
10 complainant may communicate directly with the Division regarding this Stipulated Settlement,
11 without notice to or participation by respondent or his counsel. If the Division fails to adopt this
12 Stipulation as its Order, the Stipulated Settlement and Disciplinary Order shall be of no force or
13 effect (except for this paragraph), it shall be inadmissible in any legal action between the parties,
14 and the Division shall not be disqualified from further action in this matter by virtue of its
15 consideration of this Stipulation.
16 11. The parties agree that facsimile copies of this Stipulated Settlement and
17 Disciplinary Order, including facsimile signatures thereto, shall have the same force and effect as
18 the original Stipulated Settlement and Disciplinary Order and original signatures.
19 12. In consideration of the foregoing recitals and stipulations, the parties agree that
20 the Division shall, without further notice or formal proceeding, issue and enter the following
21 Disciplinary Order:
22 DISCIPLINARY ORDER
23 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Physician's and Surgeon's Certificate No. G 54401
24 issued to respondent Glenn E. Miller, M.D. is revoked; however, the revocation is stayed and
25 respondent is placed on probation for seven (7) years on the following terms and conditions:
26 1. Within fifteen (15) days of the effective date of this decision, respondent shall
27 provide the Division, or its designee, proof of service that respondent has served a true copy of this
28 decision on the Chief of Staff or the Chief Executive Officer at every hospital where privileges or
3
1 membership are extended to respondent or where respondent is employed to practice medicine and
2 on the Chief Executive Officer at every insurance carrier where malpractice insurance coverage is
3 extended to respondent.
4 2. ACTUAL SUSPENSION As part of probation, respondent is suspended from
5 the practice of medicine for one hundred eighty (180) days beginning the sixteenth (161h) day after
6 the effective date of this decision.
7 3. PSYCHIATRIC EVALUATION Within thirty (30) days of the effective date of
8 this decision, and on a periodic basis thereafter as may be required by the Division or its designee,
9 respondent shall undergo a psychiatric evaluation (and psychological testing, if deemed necessary)
10 by a Division-appointed psychiatrist, who shall furnish an evaluation report to the Division or its
11 designee. Respondent shall not engage in the practice of medicine until notified by the Division or
12 its designee of its determination that respondent is mentally fit to practice safely. The respondent
13 shall pay the cost of the psychiatric evaluation.
14 If, based on a recommendation by the evaluating psychiatrist, respondent is required
15 by the Division or its designee to undergo psychiatric treatment, respondent shall within thirty (30)
16 days of the requirement notice submit to the Division for its prior approval the name and
17 qualifications of a psychiatrist of respondent's choice. Respondent shall undergo and continue
18 psychiatric treatment until further notice from the Division or its designee. Respondent shall have
19 the treating psychiatrist submit quarterly status reports to the Division or its designee indicating
20 whether the respondent is capable of practicing medicine safely.
21 4. MONITORING Within thirty (30) days of the effective date of this decision,
22 respondent shall submit to the Division or its designee for its prior approval a plan of practice in
23 which respondent's practice shall be monitored by another physician in respondent's field of
24 practice, who shall provide periodic reports to the Division or its designee.
25 If the monitor resigns or is no longer available, respondent shall, within fifteen (15)
26 days, move to have a new monitor appointed, through nomination by respondent and approval by the
27 Division or its designee.
28
4
1 5. ORAL CLINICAL EXAMINATION Respondent shall take and pass an oral
2 clinical examination on the subject matter of the allegations in the Amended Accusation. The
3 examination shall be taken within thirty (30) days of the effective date ofthis decision. If
4 respondent fails the first examination, respondent shall be allowed to take and pass a second
5 examination, which may consist of a written as well as an oral examination. The waiting period
6 between the first and second examinations shall be at least three (3) months. If respondent fails to
7 pass the first and second examinations, respondent may take a third and final examination after
8 waiting one (1) year. Failure to pass the oral clinical examination within eighteen (18) months after
9 the effective date of this decision shall constitute a violation of probation. The respondent shall pay
10 the costs of all examinations.
11 Respondent shall remain on actual suspension pursuant to Term and Condition No. 2
12 above until he satisfies this term and condition of probation. If respondent does not pass the initial
13 examination, respondent shall remain suspended from the practice of medicine until a repeat
14 examination has been successfully passed, as evidenced by written notice to respondent from the
15 Division or its designee.
16 6. PRACTICE RESTRICTION Respondent shall be restricted from treating
17 female patients during the term of probation.
18 7. ETHICS COURSE Within sixty (60) days of the effective date of this decision,
19 respondent shall enroll in a course in Ethics approved in advance by the Division or its designee, and
20 shall successfully complete the course during the first year of probation.
21 8. OBEY ALL LAWS Respondent shall obey all federal, state, and local laws, all
22 rules governing the practice of medicine in California, and remain in full compliance with any court
23 ordered criminal probation, payments and other orders.
24 9. QUARTERLY REPORTS Respondent shall submit quarterly declarations
25 under penalty of perjury on forms provided by the Division, stating whether there
26 has been compliance with all the conditions of probation.
27 10. PROBATION SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM COMPLIANCE
28 Respondent shall comply with the Division's probation surveillance program. Respondent shall, at
5
1 all times, keep the Division informed of his business and residence addresses which shall both serve
2 as addresses of record. Changes of such addresses shall be immediately communicated in writing to
3 the Division. Under no circumstances shall a post office box serve as an address of record.
4 Respondent shall also immediately inform the Division, in writing, of any travel to
5 any areas outside the jurisdiction of California which lasts, or is contemplated to last, more than
6 thirty (30) days.
7 11. INTERVIEW WITH THE DIVISION, ITS DESIGNEE OR ITS
8 DESIGNATED PHYSICIAN(S) Respondent shall appear in person for interviews with the
9 Division, its designee or its designated physician(s) upon request at various intervals and with
10 reasonable notice.
11 12. TOLLING FOR OUT-OF-STATE PRACTICE. RESIDENCE OR IN- STATE
12 NON-PRACTICE In the event respondent should leave California to reside or to practice outside
13 the State or for any reason should respondent stop practicing medicine in California, respondent shall
14 notify the Division or its designee in writing within ten (10) days of the dates of departure and return
15 or the dates of non-practice within California. Non-practice is defined as any period of time
16 exceeding thirty (30) days in which respondent is not engaging in any activities defined in Sections
17 2051 and 2052 of the Business and Professions Code. All time spent in an intensive training
18 program approved by the Division or its designee shall be considered as time spent in the practice of
19 medicine. Periods of temporary or permanent residence or practice outside California or of
20 non-practice within California, as defined in this condition, will not apply to the reduction of the
21 probationary period.
22 13. COMPLETION OF PROBATION Upon successful completion of probation,
23 respondent's certificate shall be fully restored.
24 14. VIOLATION OF PROBATION If respondent violates probation in any
25 respect, the Division, after giving respondent notice and the opportunity to be heard, may revoke
26 probation and carry out the disciplinary order that was stayed. If an accusation or petition to revoke
27 probation is filed against respondent during probation, the Division shall have continuing
28
6
1 jurisdiction until the matter is final, and the period of probation shall be extended until the matter is
2 final.
3 15. COST RECOVERY Respondent is hereby ordered to reimburse the Division
4 the amount Gftwelve thousand dollars ($12,000.00) within one (1) year of the effective date of this
5 decision for the Division's investigative and legal costs. Failure to reimburse the Division's costs
6 shall constitute a violation of the probation order, unless the Division agrees in writing to payment
7 by an installment plan because of financial hardship. The filing of bankruptcy by respondent shall
8 not relieve respondent of his responsibility to reimburse the Division for its costs.
9 16. PROBATION COSTS Respondent shall pay the costs associated with
10 probation monitoring each and every year of probation, which are currently set at $2,304.00, but may
11 be adjusted on an annual basis. Such costs shall be payable to the Division and delivered to the
12 designated probation surveillance monitor at the beginning of each calendar year. Failure to pay
13 costs within 30 days of the due date shall constitute a violation of probation.
14 17. LICENSE SURRENDER Following the effective date of this decision, if
15 respondent ceases practicing due to retirement, health reasons or is otherwise unable to satisfy the
16 terms and conditions of probation, respondent may voluntarily tender his certificate to the Board.
17 The Division reserves the right to evaluate the respondent's request and to exercise its discretion
18 whether to grant the request, or to take any other action deemed appropriate and reasonable under the
19 circumstances. Upon formal acceptance of the tendered license, respondent will no longer be subject
20 to the terms and conditions of probation.
21 ACCEPTANCE
22 I have carefully read the above Stipulated Settlement and Disciplinary Order and have
23 fully discussed the terms and conditions and other matters contained therein with my attorney Mark
24 A. Levin, Esq. I understand the effect this stipulation will have on my Physician and Surgeon's
25 Certificate. I enter into this Stipulated Settlement freely, voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently,
26 and I agree to be bound by the Disciplinary Order and Decision of the Division of Medical Quality
27 of the Medical Board of California. I further agree that a facsimile copy of this Stipulated
28
7
1 Settlement and Disciplinary Order, including facsimile copies of signatures, may be used with the
2 same force and effect as the original.
3
4 DATED: '1/-:J.£/oa , ' ~· 5
6
7
G E. MILLER, M.D. Respondent
I have read and fully discussed with my client, respondent Glenn E. Miller, M.D., the
8 terms and conditions and other matters contained in the above Stipulated Settlement and
9 Disciplinary Order, and I approve its form and content.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
~ Attorney for Respondent
ENDORSEMENT
The foregoing Stipulated Settlement and Disciplinary Order is hereby respectfully
submitted for consideration by the Division of Medical Quality, Medical Board of California,
Department of Consumer Affairs.
DATED:
Attorneys for Complainant
27 DOJ Docket Number: 03573160-LA1998AD2249
stipulation 3/11/02
TS:ts 28 a:\miller stipulated settlement
8
..__ _________________________ ~ --------- -
EXHIBIT A
.
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22 ')"'1 _ _,
24
25
26
27
28
Lewin & Levin A Partnership of Professional Corporations
Mark A. Levin, State Bar No. 48199 Henry Lewin, State Bar No. 33510
Debra L. Grossman, State Bar No. 174666 1925 Century Park East, Suite 850
Los Angeles, CA 90067-2709 Tel: (310) 277-9092 •Fax: (310) 277-4558
Attorneys for Re~ndent GLENN E. MILL ., M.D.
BEFORE THE DIVISION OF MEDICAL QUALITY
l\IBDICAL BOARD OF CAI:IFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of the Accusation Against: Case No. 05-96-67903 OAH No. L-19999080353
GLENN E. MILLER, M.D. 1335 State Street Santa Barbara, California 93 101
Physician's & Surgeon's Certificate No. G 54401,
Respondent.
STIPULATION RE: AMENDMENT OF ACCUSATION
THE PARTIES TO THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED MAITER, BY AND THROUGH THEIR
RESPECTIVE COUNSEL, HEREBY STIPULATE TO THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS TO .. lv!EDICAL BOARD OF CALIFORNIA ACCUSATION NO. 05-96-67903:
II
II
II
1. The second, third and eighth causes for discipline (iii\ 8, 9 andl4 of the Accusation)
are stricken in their entirety.
l EXH 1 35
'
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
l l
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26 II
27 i II
2[ 11
II
2. The fourth cause for discipline (ii 10 of the Accusation) is amended as follows:
A. Paragraph lO(B)(l) through and including paragraph lO(B)(lO), paragraph
10(B)(l2) and paragraph 10(B)(l3) are stricken from the Accusation.
3. The fifth cause for discipline (ii 11 of the Accusation) is amended as follows:
A. Paragraph l l(B)(l) through and including paragraph l l(B)(lO), paragraph
l l(B)(l2) and paragraph l l(B)(l3) are stricken from the Accusation.
4. The sixth cause for discipline (ii 12 of the Accusation) is amended as follows:
A. Paragraph 12(A) is stricken and realleged to read:
"Complainant refers to and, by this reference, incorporates
herein the allegations set forth in paragraph 10, subparagraphs
A and B, as amended, as though fully set forth."
5. The seventh cause for discipline (ii 13 of the Accusation) is amended as follows:
A. Paragraph l 3(A) is stricken and realleged to read:
"Complainant refers to and, by this reference, incorporates
herein the allegations set forth in paragraph 10, subparagraphs
A and B, as amended, as though fully set forth."
2
EXH 1 36
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
6.
DATED:
The ninth cause for discipline (, 15 of the Accusation) is amended as follows:
A. Paragraph l S(A) is stricken and amended to read:
"Complainant refers to and, by this reference, incorporates
herein the allegations set forth in paragraph 10, subparagraphs
A and B, as amended, as though fully set forth."
April 5, 2000
11 BILL LOCKYER LEWIN & LEVIN Attorney Gen ral of the
12 State o t;~(J10Jlrl 13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
L:\millerg\pleading\stip.amend.acc
Attolll_ey for Res_pondent GLENN E. l\1ILLER, M.D.
3
EXH 1 37
1 DANIEL E. LUNGREN, Attorney General of the State of California
2 JOSEPH P. FURMAN (State Bar No. 130654) Deputy Attorney General
3 California Department of Justice 300 South Spring Street, Suite 5212
4 Los Angeles, California 90013-1233 Telephone: (213) 897-2531
5 Attorneys for Complainant
6
7
8 BEFORE THE
9
10
DIVISION OF MEDICAL QUALI'IY MEDICAL BOARD OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA
11 In the Matter of the Accusation Against:
12 GLENN E. MILLER, M.D.
13 Psychiatric Services 1335 State Street
14 Santa Barbara, Ca. 93101
15 Physician and Surgeon's Certificate No. G54401,
16 Respondent.
17
18 Complainant alleges:
19 PARTIES
Case No. 05-96-67903
ACCUSATION
20 1. Ron Joseph ("Complainant") brings this accusation
21 solely in his official capacity as the Executive Director of the
22 Medical Board of California ("Board").
23 2. On or about March 11, 1985, Physician and Surgeon's
24 Certificate No. G54401 was issued by the Board to GLENN E. MILLER,
25 M.D. ("respondent"). At all times relevant to the charges brought
26 herein, this license has been in full force and effect. Unless
27 renewed, it will expire on May 31, 2000.
1.
1
2
3
4
JURISDICTION
3. This accusation is brought before the Board's
Division of Medical Quality
the following sections of
("Division"), under the authority of
the Business and Professions Code
5 ("Code") :
6 A. Section 2227 of the Code provides that a
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
licensee who is found guilty under the Medical Practice Act
may have his license revoked, suspended for a period not to
exceed one year, placed on probation and required to pay the
costs of probation monitoring, or such other action taken in
relation to discipline as the Division deems proper.
B. Section 725 of the Code, in relevant part,
provides:
"Repeated acts of clearly excessive prescribing
or administering of drugs or treatment, repeated acts of
clearly excessive use of diagnostic procedures, or
repeated acts of clearly excessive use of diagnostic or
treatment facilities as determined by the standard of the
community of licensees is unprofessional conduct for a
physician and surgeon, dentist, podiatrist, psychologist,
physical therapist, chiropractor, or optometrist.
II II
c. Section 726 of the Code, in relevant part,
24 provides:
25 "The commission of any act of sexual abuse,
26 misconduct, or relations with a patient, client, or
27 customer constitutes unprofessional conduct and grounds
2.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27 \ \
for disciplinary action for any person licensed under
this division, under any initiative act referred to in
this division and under Chapter 17 (commencing with
Section 9000) of Division 3.
" "
D. Section 2234 of the Code provides .that
unprofessional conduct includes, but is not limited to, the
following:
"(a) Violating or attempting to violate, directly or
indirectly, or assisting in or abetting the violation of, or
conspiring to violate, any provision of this chapter.
"(b) Gross negligence.
"(c) Repeated negligent acts.
"(d) Incompetence.
"(e) The commission of any act involving
dishonesty or corruption which is substantially related
to the qualifications, functions, or duties of a
physician and surgeon.
"(f) Any action or conduct which would have
warranted the denial of a certificate."
E. Section 2238 of the Code, in relevant
part, provides:
"A violation of any federal statute or federal
regulation or any of the statutes or regulations of this
state regulating dangerous drugs or controlled substances
constitutes unprofessional conduct."
3.
1 F. Section 2242 of the Code, in relevant
2 part, provides:
3 " (a) Prescribing, dispensing, or furnishing
4 dangerous drugs as defined in Section 4211 without a good
5 faith prior examinati9n and medical indication therefor,
6 constitutes unprofessional conduct.
7 " "
8 G. Section 2266 of the Code provides:
9 "The failure of a physician and surgeon to
10 maintain adequate and accurate records relating to the
11 provision of services to their patients constitutes
12 unprofessional conduct."
13
14 DANGEROUS DRUGS
15 4. The following medications are dangerous drugs within
16 the meaning of Business and Professions Code section 4211, nee
17 4022,Y and controlled substances where indicated:
18 A. Aquachloral (chloral hydrate) -- a sedative.
19 B. Serax (oxazepam) -- a Schedule IV controlled
20 substance, as defined in Health and Safety Code section 11057,
21 used in the treatment of anxiety.
22 c. Klonopin (clonazep~) - -a Schedule IV controlled
23 substance, as defined in Health and Safety Code section 11057,
24 used for the treatment of anxiety.
25
26 1. Business and Professions Code section 4211 has been renumbered 4022 (1996, ch. 890) and, in relevant part, defines a
27 "dangerous drug" as any drug or device which by federal or state law can be lawfully dispensed only on a prescription.
4.
1 D. Zoloft (sertraline) - primarily used for the
· 2 treatment of depression.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
E.
F.
medication.
Serzone (nefazodone) -- an antidepressant.
Buspar (buspirone HCL) an antianxiety
G. Catapres (chlonidine HCL) -- a blood pressure
medication which is also used in the treatment of attention
deficit hyperactivity disorders and anxiety.
H. Restoril (temazepam) a Schedule IV
controlled substance, as defined in Health and Safety Code
section 11057, used in the short term treatment of insomnia.
HEALm AND SAFE'IY CODE
5. The following relevant sections of the California
Health and Safety Code are referred to in this accusation:
A. Section 11153, which regulates the prescribing
of controlled substances, and provides, in relevant part:
" (a) A prescription for a controlled substance
shall only be issued for a legitimate medical purpose by
an individual practitioner acting in the usual course of
his or her professional practice .... "
B. Section 11171 which provides that "[n]o person
22 shall prescribe, administer, or dispense a controlled
23 substance except under the conditions and in the manner
24 provided by this division."
25
26
27
BUDGET ACT PROVISION
6. Section 16. 01 of the Budget Act of the State of
California, in relevant part, provides:
5.
1 " (a) No funds appropriated by this act may be
2 expended to pay any Medi-Cal claim for any service performed
3 by a physician while that physician's license is under
4 suspension or revocation due to disciplinary action of the
5 Medical Board of California."
6 " (b) No funds appropriated by this act may be
7 expended to pay any Medi-Cal claim for any surgical services
8 or other invasive procedure performed on any Medi-Cal
9 beneficiary by a physician if that physician has been placed
10 on probation due to a disciplinary action of the Medical Board
11 of California related to the performance of that specific
12 service or procedure on any patient, except in any case where
13 the board makes a determination during its disciplinary
14 process that there exist compelling circumstances that warrant
15 continued Medi-Cal reimbursement during the probationary
16 period."
17 FIRST CAUSE FOR DISCIPLINE
18 (Sexual Misconduct)
19 7. Respondent GLENN E. MILLER, M.D. is subject to
20 disciplinary action under section 726 of the Code in that
21 respondent engaged in sexual misconduct with patient P.c.Y while
22 she was under respondent's care, treatment, and management. The
23 circumstances are as follows:
24
25 2. All patient references in this pleading shall be by
26 initials only to preserve the patient's privacy rights. The true name (s) of the patient (s) are known to respondent and will be
27 disclosed to him upon his timely written request for discovery under Government Code section 11507.6.
6.
1 A. On or about and between January 1995 and March
2 1996, respondent was patient P.C.'s treating psychiatrist.
3 Respondent initially evaluated patient P. C. during January
4 1995 .' At that time, patient P. C., then 49 years old, reported
5 persistent problems with insomnia for about one year and other
6 episodes of sleep disturbance usually occurring during periods
7 of increased stress. Patient P.C. also described having felt
8 "depressed" during August 1994 for which she was given
9 hormonal replacement therapy. Respondent noted that patient
10 P. C. had an "unintentional 20 pound weight loss [over the]
11 past 6 months" as well. Respondent did not perform a mental
12 status examination or did not record that fact in patient
13 P.C. 's record. Respondent did not have patient P.C. 's vital
14
15
16
17
18
signs taken or did not record the patient's vital signs in
patient P.C. 's record. Respondent
diagnosis of "Generalized Anxiety
menopausal Syndrome."
gave patient P.C. a
Disorder" and "Pre-
B. Respondent initially prescribed clonidine, a
19 blood pressure medication which is used in the treatment of
20 anxiety, 0.05 mg at morning and noon and 0.10 mg at bedtime as
21 well as Restoril, a benzodiazepam used as a sedative, 15 mg at
22 bedtime. Patient P.C. telephoned respondent five days later
23 and reported that she continued to have difficulty sleeping.
24 Respondent then prescribed Klonopin, a benzodiazepam used in
25 the treatment of anxiety, 0.5 mg and chloral hydrate, a
26 sedative, 1.0 gm at bedtime. Patient P.C. reported the
27 following day that the new medications worked well.
7.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
c.
D.
Patient P. C. saw respondent for regular visits.
On April 19, 1995, she received an additional
prescription for Serax, benzodiazepam used in the treatment of
anxiety, 10 mg three times daily. The chloral hydrate and
Klonopin, previously prescribed, were continued at the same
dose and decreased to one-half of 0.5 mg tablet at bedtime,
respectively. Patient P. C. stopped taking Serax several weeks
later.
E. On July 17, 1995, respondent changed patient
10 P.C. 's prescription for Klonopin to 0.5 mg each morning and
11 0.5 to 1.0 mg at bedtime; resumed Serax at 10-15 mg every mid-
12 morning; and continued chloral hydrate 1.0 gm at bedtime. In
13 patient P. C. 's record, respondent also noted use of Zoloft, a
14 medication used in the treatment of depression and anxiety, at
15 "next evaluation" but did not document its intended
16 indication.
17 F. On August 21, 1995, respondent noted that
18 patient P.C. was taking Zoloft 50 mg daily but did not record
19 the date on which the patient began taking this medication or
20 the intended target symptoms. On August 28, 1995, respondent
21 reduced the Zoloft to 25 mg daily due to patient P. C. 's
22 reports of agitation and headaches. On September 14, 1995,
23 respondent discontinued patient P.C. 's use of Zoloft.
24 G. On November 13, 1995, respondent noted that
25 patient P.C. asked to be seen before her next appointment
26 after three or four days of problems with depression and
27 anxiety. Medications for patient P.C. at this time included
8.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Klonopin O. 5 mg "as needed," chloral hydrate 1. O gm at
bedtime, Serax 15 mg "as needed," and Buspar, an anti-anxiety
medication) "as needed." Respondent added Serzone, a new
antidepressant, 50 mg twice daily for one week and 75 mg twice
daily thereafter.
H. On November 20, 1995, respondent noted that
patient P.C. did not want to begin taking the Serzone until
after the upcoming Thanksgiving holiday. By December 4, 1995,
according to the patient notes prepared and maintained by
respondent, patient P.C. had begun taking Serzone, first 50 mg
twice daily and then 75 mg twice daily. Patient P. C.
tolerated the 50 mg dosage well but experienced increased
agitation on the 75 mg dosage.
I. On December 14, 1995, respondent noted that
patient P.C. has continued to take Serzone 50 mg twice daily
and has begun "feeling a lot better" and that the patient's
need for Buspar and Klonopin appears to have decreased.
J. During patient P.C. 's appointment with
respondent on December 21, 1995, respondent asked patient P. C.
to sit on his lap. Patient P.C. did so. Respondent kissed
and fondled P. C. Respondent suggested that P. C. and he engage
in sexual intercourse. Patient P.C. declined.
K.
appointment
On
with
or about January 3,
respondent regarding
1996, during an
patient P.C. 's
medications, P.C. orally copulated respondent. Respondent
2 6 wrote in the patient's records that patient P. C. said, "I
27 cannot tell you how much better I feel." and "It [my
9.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
anxiety] 's absolutely gone." Patient P.C. 's medications, at
this time, included Serzone 50 mg twice daily, chloral hydrate
1.0 gm at bedtime
L. On or about January 21, 1996, during another
appointment with respondent regarding patient
medications, P.C. and respondent engaged in
intercourse.
P.C. 's
sexual
M. On or about January 31, 1996, patient P.C.
9 became aware that respondent had married three months earlier.
10 Respondent kissed and fondled patient P.C.
11 N. Weekly, on or about and between January 31 and
12 March 7, 1996, patient P.C. saw respondent at respondent's
13 off ice. On each occasion, respondent kissed and fondled
14 patient P.C.
15 0. On or about February 16, 1996, respondent noted
16 that patient P.C. slept well several nights without chloral
1 7 hydrate. Respondent increased patient P. C. 's dosage of
18 Serzone to 75 mg twice daily due to the patient's reports of
19 anxiety attributed to work.
20 P. On or about February 28, 1996, respondent
21 masturbated in front of patient P.C. when she refused to have
22 sexual intercourse with respondent.
23 Q. Patient P.C. 's last physical encounter with
24 respondent occurred on or about March 3, 1996, when she
25 accepted respondent's invitation to come and watch him
26 parasail.
27 R. Although patient P.C. and respondent spoke
10.
1 often about their feelings for each other and the advisability
2 that patient P. C. receive care and treatment from another
3 therapist, respondent did not refer patient P.C. to another
4 psychiatrist.
5 S. Patient P. C. 's last regularly scheduled
6 appointment with respondent was to be March 20, 1996. On or
7 about March 14, 1996, P. C. left a telephone message for
8 respondent in which she canceled the appointment. On or about
9 the following day, respondent returned P.C. 's telephone call
10 and asked P. C. whether she was seeing another psychiatrist and
11 whether she wanted her records sent to him.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
SECOND CAUSE FOR DISCIPLINE
(Prescribing Without Examination Or Medical Indication)
8. Respondent GLENN E. MILLER, M.D. is subject to
disciplinary action under section 2242 of the Code in that
respondent prescribed controlled substances and other dangerous
drugs to patient P. C. without conducting a prior good faith
examination and without medical indication therefor. The
circumstances are as follows:
A. Complainant refers to and, by this reference,
incorporates herein the allegations set forth in paragraph 7,
subparagraphs A through S, inclusive, above, as though fully
set forth.
THIRD CAUSE FOR DISCIPLINE
(Excessive Prescribing)
9. Respondent GLENN E. MILLER, M. D. is subject to
11.
1 disciplinary action under section 725 of the Code in that
2 respondent excessively prescribed controlled substances and other
3 dangerous drugs to patient P.C. The circumstances are as follows:
4 A. Complainant refers to and, by this reference,
5 incorporates herein the allegations set forth in paragraph 7,
6 subparagraphs A through S, inclusive, above, as though fully
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
set forth.
FOURTH CAUSE FOR DISCIPLINE
(Gross Negligence)
10. Respondent GLENN E. MILLER, M.D. is subject to
disciplinary action under section 2234, subdivision (b), of the
Code in that respondent was grossly negligent during the care,
treatment, and management of patient P. C. The circumstances are as
follows:
A. Complainant refers to and, by this reference,
incorporates herein the allegations set forth in paragraph 7,
subparagraphs A through S, inclusive, above, as though fully
set forth.
B. The following acts and omissions of respondent
during his care, treatment and management of patient P.C.,
individually and collectively, constituted extreme departures
from the standard of care then being exercised throughout the
medical community:
(1) Failing to obtain a patient history
prior to initiating treatment with psychotropic
medication.
(2) Failing to conduct an adequate
12.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
mental status and physical examination prior to
initiating treatment with psychotropic medication.
(3) Failing to develop a differential
diagnosis based on the patient's initial report of
sleep disturbance, given that such disturbance is
highly suggestive of an underlying psychiatric
condition and should not be treated on a
symptomatic basis until common psychiat,ric
disorders have been eliminated.
(4) Failing to prepare and maintain
adequate records documenting respondent's diagnoses
and treatment and the reasons therefor.
(5) Not recognizing or failing to
initiate treatment for the patient's depressive
disorder for almost one year.
(6) Failing to discontinue the use of
benzodiazepines after two, and before six, weeks of
treatment of mixed anxiety and depression with
benzodiazepines and antidepressants.
(7) Prescribing Buspar on an "as needed"
basis'· given that such medication must be taken
regularly over a period of time before it becomes
effective.
(8) Prescribing multiple agents from the
benzodiazepine class--namely, Klonopin and Serax-
at the same time.
(9) Prescribing antidepressant agents--
13.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
namely, Zoloft and Serzone- -at doses higher than
generally tolerated by anxious patients.
(10) Failing to incorporate specific
behavioral therapies along with medication in the
treatment of patient P.C. 's anxiety.
(11) Kissing, fondling, engaging in oral
copulation, and having sexual intercourse with a
patient;
(12) Failing to terminate the
psychiatrist-patient relationship properly; and,
(13) Failing to refer the patient to
another psychiatrist
before engaging the
relationship.
for medication
patient in
management
a physical
16 F'IF'I'H CAUSE FOR DISCIPLINE
17 (Repeated Negligent Acts)
18 11., Respondent GLENN E. MILLER, M.D. is subject to
19 disciplinary action under section 2234, subdivision (c), of the
20 Code in that respondent corrunitted repeated negligent acts during
21 the care, treatment, and management of patient P.C. The
22 circumstances are as follows:
23 A. Complainant refers to and, by this reference,
24 incorporates herein the allegations set forth in paragraph 7,
25 subparagraphs A through S, inclusive, above, as though fully
26 set forth.
27 B. The following acts and omissions of respondent
14.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
during his care, treatment and management of patient P.C.,
individually and collectively, constituted departures from the
standard of care then being exercised throughout the medical
community:
(1) Failing to obtain a patient history
prior to initiating treatment with psychotropic
medication.
(2) Failing · to conduct an adequate
mental status and physical examination prior to
initiating treatment with psychotropic medication.
(3) Failing to develop a differential
diagnosis based on the patient's initial report of
sleep disturbance, given that such disturbance is
highly suggestive of an underlying psychiatric
condition and should not be treated on a
symptomatic basis until common psychiatric
disorders have been eliminated.
(4) Failing to prepare and maintain
adequate records documenting respondent's diagnoses
and treatment and the reasons therefor.
(5) Not recognizing or failing to
initiate trea,tment for the patient's depressive
disorder for almost one year.
(6) Failing to discontinue the use of
benzodiazepines after two, and before six, weeks of
treatment of mixed anxiety and depression with
benzodiazepines and antidepressants.
15.
1
4
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
(7) Prescribing Buspar on an "as needed"
basis, given that such medication must be taken
regularly over a period of time before it becomes
effective.
(8) Prescribing multiple agents from the
benzodiazepine class--namely, Klonopin and Serax-
at the same time.
(9) Prescribing antidepressant agents-
namely, Zoloft and Serzone--at doses higher than
generally tolerated by anxious patients.
(10) Failing to incorporate specific
behavioral therapies along with medication in the
treatment of patient P.C. 's anxiety.
(11) Kissing, fondling, engaging in oral
copulation, and having sexual intercourse with a
patient;
(12) Failing to terminate the
psychiatrist-patient relationship properly; and,
(13) Failing to refer the patient to
another
before
psychiatrist
engaging the
for medication management
patient in a physical
relationship.
SIXTH CAUSE FOR DISCIPLINE
(Incompetence)
12. Respondent GLENN E. MILLER, M.D. is subject to
27 disciplinary action under section 2234, subdivision (d), of the
16.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
,a ' '-' .•
Code in that respondent demonstrated a lack of knowledge or skill
in discharging the responsibilities and duties of his licensure
during his care, treatment, and management of patient P.C. The
circumstances are as follows:
A. Complainant refers to and, by this reference;
incorporates herein the allegations set forth in paragraphs 7,
subparagraphs A through S, inclusive, 10, subparagraph B, and
11, subparagraph B, above, as though fully set forth.
1 o SEVENTH CAUSE FOR DISCIPLINE
11 (Dishonest or Corrupt Acts)
12 13. Respondent GLENN E. MILLER, M.D. is subject to
13 disciplinary action under section 2234, subdivision (e), of the
14 Code in that respondent committed dishonest and corrupt acts during
15 the care, treatment, and management of patient P.C. The
16 circumstances are as follows:
17 A. Complainant refers to and, by this reference,
18 incorporates herein the allegations set forth in paragraph 7,
19 subparagraphs A through S, inclusive, above, as though fully
20 set forth.
21
22
23
24
·25
EIGHTH CAUSE FOR DISCIPLINE
{Violation of Drug Statutes)
14. Respondent GLENN E. MILLER, M.D.
disciplinary action under section 2238 of the
is subject to
Code in that
26 respondent violated Business and Professions Code section 2242 and
27 Health and Safety Code sections 11153 and 11171, regulating the
17.
, 111 l ·~ ~·
1 prescription and administration of controlled substances and other
2 dangerous drugs, during his care, treatment, and management of
3 patient P.C. The circumstances are as follows:
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
A. Complainant refers to and, by this reference,
incorporates herein the allegations set forth in paragraphs 7,
subparagraphs A through S, inclusive, 10, subparagraph B, and
11, subparagraph B, above, as though fully set forth.
NINTH CAUSE FOR DISCIPLINE
(Unprofessional Conduct)
15. Respondent GLENN E. MILLER, M.D. is subject to
12 disciplinary action under section 2234 of the Code in for
13 unprofessional conduct, generally, during his care, treatment, and
14 management of patient P.C. The circumstances are as follows:
15
16
17
18
19 \ \
20 \ \
21 \ \
22 \ \
23 \ \
24 \ \
25 \ \
26 \ \
27 \ \
A.
incorporates
subparagraphs
set forth.
Complainan~ refers to and, by this reference,
herein the allegations set forth in paragraph 7,
A through S, inclusive, above, as though fully
18.
.. ,-, ..
1 PRAYER
2 WHEREFORE, complainant requests that a hearing be held
3 on the matters herein alleged and that, following the hearing, the
4 Division issue a decision:
5 1. Revoking or suspending Physician and Surgeon's
6 Certificate Number G54401, heretofore issued to respondent GLENN E.
7 MILLER, M.D.;
8 2. Revoking, suspending, or denying approval of
9 respondent's authority to supervise physician's assistants,
10 pursuant to section 3527 of the Code;
11 3. Ordering respondent to pay the Division the
12 reasonable costs of the investigation and enforcement of this case
13 and, if placed on probation, the costs of probation monitoring; and
14 4. Taking such other and further action as the Division
15 deems necessary and proper.
16
17
18 DATED: De enter 14, 19B
19
20
21
22
23
24
25 JPF:jpf
26 RDM:DIDO
03573160-LA9BADOOOO
27 shell.ace [1197rev]
~~"-ti, ])/rec"(.,r Ron Joseph ~ ' { Executive Director Medical Board of California Department of Consumer Affairs State of California
Complainant
19.
Top Related