REGULATORY IRMATION DISTRIBUTION SYS (RIDS)
ACCESSION NBR:8201290040 DOCOATE: 82/01/26 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET # FACIL:50-361 San Onotre Nuclear Station, Untt 2, Southern Californ 05000361
50-362 San Onofre Nucleer Station, Unit 3, Southern Californ 05000362 AUTHONAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION
DIETCHRR Southern California Edison Co. RECIP NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION
DENTONrHiRe 'Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulTation, Director EISENHURD.G, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Director
SUBJECT: Forwards potential finding repts issued by GA CoRepts reflect reviewer initial opinion & have not been vertified for validity & accuracy by original destgn organization.
DISTRIBUTION CODE: 80018 COPIES RECEIVED:LTR J. ENCL 4. SIZE: TITLE: PSAR/FSAR AMDTS and Related Correspondence
NOTES:L Chandler:all FSAR & ER amends.1 cy;J Hanchett(Region V), 05000361 D Scaletti:1 cy all envir info, L Chandlertall FSAR & ER amends.1 cy:J Hanchett(Region V). 05000362 D Scalettf:1 cy all envir info,
RECIPIENT iCOPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL
ACTION: A/O LICENSNG I 0 LIC BR #3 BC 1 0 LIC BR #3 LA 1 0 ROOD,H, 01 1 1
INTERNAL: ELD 1 0 IE 06 3 3 IE/DEP/EPDB 5 1 1 IE/DEP/EPLB 36 3 3 PA 0 NRR/OE/CES 11 1 1 NRR/DE/EQB 13 3 3 NRR/DE/GB 28 2 2 NRR/DE/HGE8 30 2 2 NRR/DE/MEB 18 1 1 NRR/DE/MTEB 17 1 1 NRR/DE/QAB 21 1 1 NRR/DE/SAB 24 1 NRR/DE/SEB 25 1 1 NRk/0HFS/HFEB40 1, NRR/DHFS/LGE 32 1 1 NRR/0HFS/0LB1 34 1 1 NRR/DHFSAPTRB20 1 1 NRR/DSI/AEB 26 1 1 NRR/DSI/A8B 27 1 1 NRR/DSI/CPB 10 1 1 NRR/DSI/CS8 09 1 1 -NRR/DSI/ETSB 12 1 1 NRR/DSI/ICSB 16 1 1 NRR/OSI/PSB 19 1 1 NRR/DSI/RAB 22 1 1
1 1 NRR/DST/LGB 33 1 1
EXTERNAL: ACRS 41 16 16 BNL(AMDTS ONLY) 1 1 FEMA-REP DIV 39 ' 1 LPDR 03 1 1 NRC PDR 02 1 NSIC 05 1 1 NTIS 1 1
TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR ,64 ENCL ;5#
Southern California Edison Company P. 0. BOX 800
2244 WALNUT GROVE AVENUE
ROBERT DIETCH ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA 91770 TELEPHONE
-CE January 26, 1982 213-572-4144
Mr. Harold R. Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 2 71982m Washington, D.C. 20555
Attention: Mr. Darrell G. Eisenhut
Dear Mr. Denton:
Subject: Docket Nos. 50-361 and 50-362 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2 and 3
Enclosed are seven copies each of Potential Finding Reports issued by.General Atomic Company, as follows:
Issued to Bechtel Power Corporation
PFR-0035, 0036, 0054, 0055 and 0056 PFR-0042 and 0043 PFR-0053 and F003
Issued to Combustion Engineering Company
PFR-0037, 0045, 0046, 0047, 0048, 0049, 0050 and 0051
These reports reflect the reviewer's initial opinion and have not been verified for validity and accuracy by the original design organization.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me.
Very truly yours,
cc: NRC Region V R. H. Engelken (w encl)
8201290040 820126 PDR ADOCK 05000361
PDR 1
TORREY PINES TECHNOLOGY P.O. Bo 810O San D er-o. Ca.,torrua 92138
GEORGE L WESSMAN Director
January 25, 1982
r. D. J. Fogarty Executive Vice President Southern California Ediso P. O.Box 800 mosemead, California 9
Dear -r. Toga
Attached are Potential Reports 24 037,0045, 0046 0047, 0048, 0049, 0050, and
--Sincerely,
esaman Project Manager
Attacha
css J. Adrian V. Ball
2408-PE-4)W7 SONGS 2&3 SE M IC DESIGN VERIFICATIOW PFR NO. 2 REVISION
REPARATION BY GA INITIATOR
FFECTED ITEMS: Safety Injection Tank T-008
EQUIREMENT REFERENCE DOCUMENTS: Containment Interior Structure Analyses, No. C-257-5-04.01 (AC-1347-9199). Bechtel letter log BC-664, 4/29/75 (AC-1347-9492). Design Report for Safety Injection Tank, Calculation No. S-PEC-1l2.\Z3. 2, 6/9/76 (AC-1347-9118).
IC REtUIREMENT: The values used for the moment of inertia of the co oor slab should be sistent in documents 1, 2, and 3.
ESCRIPTION OFaTENTIAL FINDING:u used by for M.I.e given in 34 of Ref. I (attachrent 1). s transmito b chte.l to are shown Ref. 2 (attachment 2). The ed by C he dynamic of the S.1.
ak are given in pg. 3-6 Re (attachment There is an ± stency in the ues used by C.E. for at of er o a oncret ab.
REPARED BY: N. Krishn3n .
EJECTION OF GATASK cMMENTS BYDATE:
EJECTION OF DRI GN ORG. CO DATE:
EVIEW BY GA T LEADER MMENTS
io<REE PF IS VALID BY DATE 3 REQUEST RE-REVIEW BY DATE.
DISAGREE BY DATE
3 REVIEW OF ORIGINAL DESIGN ORGS. COMMENTS BY:DATE:
2408 NO. -0045
POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT REVISION SONGS 2&3 SEISMIC DESIGN VERIFICATION
REPARATION BY GA INITIATOR
,FFECTED ITEMS: Interface Review Requirement
1EQUIREMENT REFERENCE DOCUMENTS:
Attachment 3 PSAR Section III, paragraph 11
1ASIC REQUIREMENT: "Specifications and drawings prepared within he 1eeing de are reviewed by all engineering departments havi a interface v esign -area that the document covers."
)ESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL FINDING: 0I The Reactor Design Grou de gn nual, RD- not specific equire review of design documents b erfacing org at .
WREPARED BY: o tEJECTION OF GA T R'COMMENT DATE: IEJECTION OF 0 I ; DESIGN 0RG. S BY: DATE:
tEVIEW BY GA TASK LEADE COMMENTS
AGREE PF IS VAUD BY DATE , 2 REQUEST RE REVIEW BY DATE
DISAGREE BY DATE
_.-OF. ORIGINAL DESIGN ORGS. COMMENTS BY: -DATE:
2404RINO -#6
POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT REVISION Z SONGS 2&3 SEISMIC DESIGN VERIFICATION
REPARATION BY GA INITIATOR
FFECTED ITEMS: Design Requirement, Externally Designed Component
EQUIREMENT REFERENCE DOCUMENTS: Attachment 3 PSAR Section 111, paragraph 13
AIC REQUIREMENT:
The adequacy of the design of safety relate and c t designed by is assured by the performance of desig e , the per e of independent
nalyses by CE design personnel, or by a 1* testin."
ESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL FINDING- C)
e Reactor Design Group at manual, RD-1 ot establish aequacy eviev/verification pr e or safety at systems de ned y organization(s) ther than CE.
R EPARED BY: REJECTION OF GA OMME DATE: REJECTION OF 0 AL DESIGN ORG. NTS BY: DATE:
REVIEW BY GA TASK LEAD I COMMENTS
AGREE PF IS VALID SY -DATE_
D REQUEST RE-REVIEW BY DATE
0 DISAGREE BY DATE
-tEV1EWDFORTGTNAL DESIGN ORGS.tOMMENTS BY: DATE:
2408- 0. -4
POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT REVISION
SONGS 2&3 SEISMIC DESIGN VERIFICATION
PARATION BY GA INITIATOR
-ECTED ITEMS: Organizational Design Review Requirements
UIREMENT REFERENCE DOCUMENTS:
) Attachment 3, PSAR, Section 111, paragraph 14 & 15
) QA Topical Report CENPD-210A Rev. 3, paragraph 17.3.2A.
IC REQUIREMENT:
(See Attachment 1)
SCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL FINDING:
e above requirements were ressed in neera proced 01, RD-1
ar in the QAD1 to inst atgneers when to vork with reviewers.
EPARED BY:
JECTION OF GA TAS MENTSDATE:
JECTION OF 0 -SIGN ORG. Y DATE:
EVIEW BY GA TASK LEADER COMMENTS
AGREE PF IS VALID BY 1- DATE
2 REQUEST RE-REVIEW BY DATE
3 DISAGREE BY DATE
2 oRanEVIEW OF ORIGINAL DESIGN ORGS. COMMENTS BY: DATE:
- 2408-PFR-0047
ATTACHMENT I
"In addition to the review procedures described above, the design of the WSSS is subjected to scruntiny by other independent individuals and organizations. The Safety and Licensing Dept. periodically evaluates the reactor design in terms of established safety criteria and also some cases verifies the accuracy of design characteristics. In addition section which performs accident analyses, the Safety and Licensin epa nt performs reliability and failure modes and effects analysis on a pertaining to the engineered safety features of the plant as well systena where malfunctions could affect plant safety.
There is also a Nuclear Safety Committee compe f repres ttives of the various disciplines which periodically e~iews major safet ktzd design problems. Safety Analysis Reports c "y Safety a naing are periodically subjected to review b uelear Safe ittee to provide further assurance of desig ad rom a safety int. In addition; th! Chief Scientist for Nuclear eviews the design as he safety analysis of major conse u a a represe at of the hi vel of management in the Nucl a r Systems sion."
ladependent gn Review agement rev ists of a design review committee/task force fo 4 he reques o t e NPS Vice President or the Vice President of En&10?etig and Devel orc of Engineerin:-
2409R NO.-*048
POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT REVISION SONGS 2&3 SEISMIC DESIGN VERIFICATION
'REPARATION BY GA INITIATOR
kFFECTED ITEMS: Project Office Responsibility - Purchase Orders
REQUIREMENT REFERENCE DOCUMENTS:
Attachment 3 PSAR Section IV, paragraph 3
BASIC REQUIREMENT:
".... the project manager has the responsibil 4 ensuring t procurement order has been reviewed by all engineerin nts hav trface with the equipment to be procured or manufacture
DESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL FINDING:
None of the CE Design Manua 001, RD-i, H addressed Office/Manage: responsibility in ens ierface rev f procurement d documrents.
PREPARED BY:
REJECTION OF GA T COMMN DATE:
REJECTION OFI DESIGN ORG BY DATE:
REVIEW BY GA TASK LEADE COMMENTS
AGREE PF IS VALID Y DATE
U REQUEST RE-REVIEW BY 'DATE
o DISAGREE BY DATE
l REVIEW OF ORIGINAL DESIGN ORGS. COMMENTS BY: DATE:-
2408O NO. - 9
POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT REVISION . SONGS 2&3 SEISMIC DESIGN VERIFICATION
REPARATION BY GA INITIATOR
FFECTED ITEMS: Internal/External Design Review Considerations.
EQUIREMENT REFERENCE DOCUMENTS:
QA Topical Report CENPD-210A, Rav. 3, para. 17.3.3
ASIC REQUIREMENT: Interface Design Control - "The d a section procedures indir: utrements for review and approval by other engineer oups. The ject office set a design documents to the customer, A/E or co !hpct r as requ ted for in:. Lon, review or approval. This review with a of the ing section, or L. e of EPS considers compatibility of a a design inte accessibility for ; vice inspection, maintenance, repair a cceptance r or tests and inspecti
)ESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL FINDING:
Checklist 5.6-6 in the QADM r evivring sp ations did no de the detail checkpoints in the ba eqirement. F th e check pint in the basic requirement did not I e the (19) of ANSI 4para. 6.3.1.
>REPARED BY: EJECTION OF GA T COMMENT DATE: ,
IEJECTION OF ESIGN ORG. BY: DATE:
REVIEW BY GA TASK LEADER COMMENTS
X.AGREE PF IS VALID B - DATE
0 REQUEST RE-REVIEW BY DATE
0_ DISAGREE BY DATE
0. REVIEWLO RIGINALDESIGN ORGSCOMMENTS BY: DATE:-
2408 R NO. -005)
POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT REVISION SONGS 2&3 SEISMIC DESIGN VERIFICATION
EPARATION BY GA INITIATOR
FFECTED ITEMS: Design Control of Spares
EQUIREMENT REFERENCE DOCUMENTS:
Combustion Engineering Topical, CENPD-210A Section 17.4
ASIC REQUIREMENT: "Standard commercial or previously approved ma eria , parts and at includin! pare or replacement parts essential to the related fu structures, systems, and components, are subjected e selecti evie controls as
the original safety-related items."
ESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL FINDING:
The CE design manual, Q , d not address /replacement o eaelt control for safety re 4J) components.
REPARED BY:
EJECTION OF GAT ER COMMEN _DATE:
EJECTION OF I DESIGN ORGA TS BY DATE:
EVIEW BY GA TASK LEADET COMMENTS
AGREE PF IS VALID 841 DATE
REQUESTRE-RfEVIEW BY DATE
- DISAGREE--- -- BY DATE
3-R-tEVIEW-OF-RIGNA-L DESIGN ORGSMCOMMENTS BY: DATE:
POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT REVISION
SONGS 2&3 SEISMIC DESIGN VERIFICATION
PREPARATION BY GA INITIATOR
FFECTEO ITEMS: Seismic category I electric motor operated valves supplied by CE.
REQUIREMENT REFERENCE DOCUMENTS: Onofre 2 6 3 FSAR, Appendix 3.10A, Criteria for Seismic Design of c Category
uipment
BASIC REQUIREMENT: Section 3.10 A of the TSAR stat valve/ope ator assemblies
nstrated to have natural frequencies greater than 33 cps and fo u ich the
evations of the valve and operator are not be stati yze using a
axaum acceleration of 5.0 g.
DESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL FINDING: ications 0 27 and 137 705 Section
.2.5 state that valve suppli emonstrate y a ysis or valves hav!
aiminus natural frequen gr te than 33 cp are capable bp rating and
emaining intact during fter exposur o a'4ulted coniqon f 3.0& static
cceleration. Thes tions fine valve 'as or elevations. It
ppears that the CE fications a consistent FSAR requirement of
nalysis for a 5.0g celeraic \
J D St e1 8 PREPARED BY:
REJECTION OF G L ER COMMEN 4 DATE:
REJECTION OF L DESIGN ORG. TSSY: DATE
REVIEW BY GA TASK LEAD COMMENTS
GREE PF IS VALID BY 7 DATE
_l REQUEST RE-REVIEW BY DATE
_0 DISAGREE BY DATE
DEVIEWDFO.RIGINAL DESIGN ORG-SCOMMENTS BY: DATE:.-
TORREY PINES TECHNOLOGY -P.O. Box 81608 San Diego, California 92138 Telephone: (714) 455-2654
GEORGE L. WESSMAN Director
January 25, 1982
Mr. D. J. Fogarty Executive Vice President Southern California E P. 0. Box 800 Rosemead, Cali ni
Dear M 9 ty:
Attached are Poten 0inding ReFR-0053
George Proj er
cc: J. Adrian CE J. Hem Be htel
A Division of General Atomic Company
pW2FR NO. u408-IFR-0053
POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT REVISION.
SONGS 2&3 SEISMIC DESIGN VERIFICATION
A. PREPARATION BY GA INITIATOR
AFFECTED ITEMS: The Seismic Category I Switch Gear
REQUIREMENT REFERENCE DOCUMENTS: Bechtel Power Corporation Spec. No. -2 and 10
Addendum "Quality Class II Spec for 4160v Switchgear for San Onof Nuc Generating
Station Units 2 & 3".
BASIC REQUIREMENT: Section 4.00 Part II Parameter formation
4.33 Scope 4.33.01 Supplementar ion
Elevation 3\ t
DESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL FIN The Switchgear elevati is 0 eet; this is both in Append this Spec
(Structural Respons es) and in Bech1ril 35541-4 (1 -965 which show the
Control BLG Ele uipment La the 50' Leve ""*A
PREPARED BY: A. dd E: 1-20-82
REJECTION LEADER CO . DATE:
REJECTIONJ' RIGINAL DESIGN OG.MMENTS BY: DATE:
B. REVIEW BY GA TASK COMMENTS
'AGE PF IS VALID BY DATE
D REQUEST.REREVIEW BY DATE
o DISAGREE. BY DATE
8..REVAEW-OFLRDIGINAL DESIG\LORG& COMMENTS BY: DATE:
0 FR NO. 2408-PFR-F03
POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT REVISION
SONGS 2&3 SEISMIC DESIGN VERIFICATION
A. PREPARATION BY GA INITIATOR
AFFECTED ITEMS: The Seismic Category I Motor Control Centers (MCC)
REQUIREMENT REFERENCE DOCUMENTS: Bechtel Power Corporation Spec. No. 302-4 and
8 Addendum. "Quality Class II & III Spec for Motor Control Cente for Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2 & 3.
BASIC REQUIREMENT: Section 4.11.3 Mounting Base: S te that the M1 ase will be tack welded to steel channels embedded in the cret floor, and t aendor shall determine the location of the welds to sa Smic requir r 4.92 (i.e., Appx 4F).
DESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL FI 1. The spec is written for f tion and te ny individual C. No direction
is given on seismi e fonee of the i di al units whe moun ed in an array. 2. There is no spe n of the f ity of the ste support foundation that
the vendor mu ate during e mic qualifi 3.There is no re 'urement in t^,V cation'to keir oads measured during
seismic testing back to 1 so that Bech 1 heck the structural integrity of the rail design.
1-23-82A PREPARED BY: E: 1.23
REJECTION K LEADER CO S DATE:
REJECTIO 0 RIGINAL DESIGN 0 MENTS BY: DATE:
B. REVIEW BY GA TASK E COMMENTS
E PF IS VALID BY DATE
O REQUEST RE-REVIEW BY DATE
O3 DISAGREE BY DATE
0 REVIEW OF ORIGINAL DESIGN ORGS. COMMENTS BY: DATE:
TORREY PINES TECHNOLOGY P.O. So 81606 San Oseq# Caitorna 92t38 Te eonorne 1794) 4' 5-2654
GEORGE L WESSMAN
January 25, 1982
Mr. D. J. Fogarty Bxecutive Vice President Southern California Edison P. 0. ban 800
*Dear Mt. vog)
George L. oss Project
act an
A OW SC g*'MtAg.C o A
2408 PFR NO.
POTE AL FINDING REPORT 9EVISION SONGS 2&3 SEISMIC DESIGN VERIFICATION
PREPARATION BY GA INITIATOR
AFFECTED ITEMS: Piping supports for the suction line between the refueling water tan,
(T-006) and the low pressure safety injection pump (P-016)
REQUIREMENT REFERENCE DOCUMENTS:
PSA Drawings:
S2-SI-003-H-002 S2-S1-031-H-003 92-SI-004-1-013 S2-Si-002-H-020
BASIC REQUIREMENT:
The PSA Drawings should reflect the fie a on the.
DESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL FINDING:
See Attachment No. 1 to t for desc n of Potentia .
PREPARED BY: REJECTIN OF OMMENTS T DATE:
REJECTION OF ESIGN ORG. C BY: DATE:
REVIEW BY GA K LEADER COMMENTS
5 AGREE PF IS VALID BY DATE
O REQUEST RE-REVIEW BY DATE
0 DISAGREE - By _ DATE
O REVIEW OF ORIGINAL DESIGN ORGS.1OMMENTS SY. DATE:
PFR No. -0042
ATTACHMENT I
PIPE SUPPORT DRAWutG FL4DINGS
832-81-0334H-002
On DCN 01, Item M, the distance between be hows 11. On Rev.
0,they show 10 (min . Actual distance *
32-31-004-11-01.3\.
ionf W4 x 1 relati onor bolts base isnot as
shown onl drawing. Dimeg a oud ce V' -r44 bolts and 'vg to
upperbo I.ta. Atua.5L ns are 10" to\,f rows of i
S2-SI -0~1 -H-003
Locatio 0 on :1e 6 W& are sshown an DCN wO8.
32S-002-H-020
Complete and, a rformed p t with thk L1pwing items nopte O$
F tbase ed to ver beded plate. This
ed is not as n drawi*
2) Cl tween piye and stops on support (east
ipe) are rthan 1/50. 0.192/0.176 measureal
9'6uo--PFR NO.
POTEN#L FINDING REPORT *VISION
SONGS 2&3 SEISMIC DESIGN VERIFICATION
)REPARATION BY GA INITIATOR
AFFECTED ITEMS: Suction line between refueling water tank (T-006) and low pressure
safety injection pump (P-016)
REQUIREMENT REFERENCE DOCUMENTS:
1) Stress ISO 1204-004-1, Rev. I
2) Stress ISO 1204-002-1, Rev. D
3) Stress ISO 1204-002-2, Rev. A
BASIC REQUIREMENT:
Stress isometrics should reflect the field as-bui\§U ration.
DESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL FINDING:
The three isome tris refer ave had dim04Si.iQnbetve resg and fittinA
that were not the be ield Insta~P These.-find% r9Ie documented in
Attachment 1.
PREPARED BY: 'D-' T
REJECTION OF TA L OMMENTS TE DATE:
REJECTION OF IGN ORG. C BY.DATE:'
REVIEW BYGA K LEADER OMMENTS
9 AGREE PF IS VALID By A*** DATE '
1I REQUEST RE-REVIEW BY DATE
I DISAGREE* BY DATE
-0- REVIEW OFRIGINAL DESIGN ORGS. COMMENTS BY: DATE:
FR No. -0043 ATTACHM.NT I
STRESS ISO F.NDINGS
I. ISO No. 1204-004-1
1) The supports on line 10 p-24*-C.L60 are as described belo*
a) The y-z restraint at data point 52 is shown 104
south of data point 5b. Actual dimension 3
b) The Z-anubber at data point17 ais a S as 29*4 south of data point 56. Actual dimens
o) The spring hanger at data Ant 4 is shown 29'4" south of data point 56 \c!P dimesion.
d) Drain line 121 a Nit 4 at a the wall and does
not conform d detail gi n Bechtel'Wslnwer to
PFR-0002.
11. ISO No. 1204
1) Dis a veen a 812 and ) a wn on the ISO as
4.917 Actual d a 12*0e, used in analysis is 11.917'.
III. 180 No. O k1 (line 00 2
1) .a spri two-way r a data point 802 which 4* down from 1 . The 3p the two-way restraint are
not togeth The spring is wn from elbow and the two-way restra beyond t spr .
TORREY PINES TECHNOLOGY P.O. Box 81608 San Diego, California 92,38 Telephone: (714) 455-2654
GEORGE L. WESSMAN Director
January 25, 1982
Mr. D. J. Fogarty Executive Vice Presiden Southern California Ei P. 0. Box 800 Rosemead, Cal oniT4 91770
Dear Mr Faty:
Attached are en inding R R-0035,0054, 0055 and 0056.
04 05
J. Bechtel
A Division of General Atomic Company
PK NO. 2408-PFR-0035
POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT REVISION
SONGS 2&3 SEISMIC DESIGN VERIFICATION
A. PREPARATION BY GA INITIATOR
AFFECTED ITEMS: Low Pressure Safety Injection (LPSI) System from Pump P-016
(System 1204) to System 1206 in Piping Stress Analysis Package PSG-57.
REQUIREMENT REFERENCE DOCUMENTS:
BPC Calculation No. PSG-57, Computer Run Q36L19
Area Drawing -2C2 Dwg. No. 40365-9 (IDCN Dated 12/21/81)
BASIC REQUIREMENT:
A design change notice has been issued a valve in referenced piping
analysis.
DESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL FI
The referenced chan ce changed th n perated valv-2TE35lY (as analyzed)
to a motor oper)\\l . The wei ~~.C.G.. location -14was nticrporated
into the analysi
P c e1-19-82 PREPARED BY: P en19
REJECTI NK LEADER COI DATE:
REJECTIO RIGINAL-DESGN0 MMENTS BY: DATE:
B. REVIEW BY GA TASK COMMENTS
r AGREE PF-IS VALID BY DATE
O REQUEST-RE-REVIEW BY ._DATE
0 DISAG-REE--- BY __DATE
-- -0-R-EV--EW-O-F-O-RIGINAL DESIGNORGS.- COMMENTS BY:- DATE:
PWNO. 240m-PR-0036
POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT REVISION
SONGS 2&3 SEISMIC DESIGN VERIFICATION
A. PREPARATION BY GA INITIATOR
SAFFECTED ITEMS: Low Pressure Safety
injection (LPSI) system from Pump P-016
(System.1204) to System 1206 in Piping Stress Analysis Package
PSG-57.
REQUIREMENT REFERENCE DOCUMENTS:
BPC Calculation No. PSG-57 Computer Run Q36L19
BASIC REQIUIREMENT:
Flow orifice weight and node location be inchepiping
Dreference d r e oocation
and
REJCITION OF PO ENTAE CO~~i~ .
nld
tye ofice insta Line 32. ping model M NSGT the wegh (300 oib ficflnea o a node 1oca Tio dicating the flanges
are there. The Tho Ik-Lce weight w cosdrdin . Si5fcLodnAia
Restrait" cal aNo sheets eit no 96-X load di ct ~i~Sheet 24, and node 98-Y
load direction; eet 25).
PREPARED BY A
REJECTION K LEADER CO DATE
REJECTIO0 RIGINAL DESIGN 0 MENTS BY: AE
B.. RE VIEW BY GTAKCOM MENTS
ff AGREE-PF IS VALID BY [d DATE
O REQUESTREREVIEW BY DATE ...........
O DISAGREE-- B BY DATE
RG S COMMENTS BY: DATE:
PFR NO. 2408-PFR-0054
POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT REVISION _
SONGS 2&3 SEISMIC DESIGN VERIFICATION
A. PREPARATION BY GA INITIATOR
AFFECTED ITEMS: Low Pressure Safety Injection (LPSI) System from Pump P-016
(System 1204) to System 1206 in Piping Stress Analysis Package PSG-57.
REQUIREMENT REFERENCE DOCUMENTS:
BPC Calculation No. PSG-57, computer run Q36L19 Sheet 43- ISO Sketch Dwg No. 1204-038-1
BASIC REQUIREMENT:
Need analytical justification supporting Unit No. 3 configurati n.
DESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL FINDING:
ISO sketch drawing No. 1204-0 a major confi u ional differe c between
Unit No. 2 and Unit No. 3 rangements. e st ss report y ents the oloads developed in the ni . 2configurat here is no doc justification
for the Unit No. 3 urion.in PSG-7d
PREPARED BY: PikenDA E
REJECTION OF GA TA DER\COMMENTS BY TE
REJECTION OF SIGN ORG. CO N : DATE:
B. REVIEW A K LEADER MMENTS
&xAGREE-PF IS VALID BY DATE
O REQUEST_-RE.REVIEW BY DATE
0 DISAGREE-- BY DATE
0 REVIEW Of ORIGINAL DESIGN ORGS. COMMENTS BY DATE:
- N. 2408-WiR-0055
POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT REVISION
SONGS 2&3 SEISMIC DESIGN VERIFICATION
A. PREPARATION BY GA INITIATOR
AFFECTED ITEMS: Low Pressure Safety Injection (LPSI) System from Pump P-016
(System 1204) to System 1206 in piping stress analysis package PSG-57.
REQUIREMENT REFERENCE DOCUMENTS:
BPC Calculation No. PSG-57, Computer Run Q36L19
BASIC REQUIREMENT: Need justification for "non-applicable" trea f eismic Anc t (SAM)
reported in Package PSG-57.
DESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL FI
There is no document idece reported PG 7 that there is nligible movement
between the pipi anchor poin k es 5,7 and O warrant the non
applicable ass toN or the SAM y .
PREPARED BY: L e ng -22-82
REJECTIO K LEADER CO DATE:
REJECTIO RIGINAL DESIN 0 0 MENTS BY DATE:
B. REVIEW BY GA TASK COMMENTS
AGREE PFIS VALID BY DATE
0 REQUESTREREVIEW BY DATE
O DISAGREE__ BY DATE
O REVIEW-OF-CRIGINAL DESIGN ORGS- COMMENTS BY: DATE:
PFR No. 2408 PFR-0056
POTENTIAL FINDING REPORT REVIS10N
SONGS 2&3 SEISMIC DESIGN VERIFICATION
A. PREPARATION BY GA INITIATOR
AFFECTED ITEMS: Low Pressure Safety Injection System Piping Stress Analysis Package PSG-117
REQUIREMENT REFERENCE DOCUMENTS:
BASIC REQUIREMENT: Consistency between Isometric t and Comput r el.
DESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL Fl des 340, 345 d 3 he Co er 1 do not
correlate with the co res n g node numb Isometric In the Data Scan for pro m r PO3484, 3 s4 nitreaetit41'fo node 335 in th - ction. On ic Sketch Dwg 04-037-1E, node 340
describes an b .67' from n 3 in the -X d . In the Computer Model, node 345 is an tlbow at th ation as no e ile on the Iso node 345 is
an elbow at a 5.17' hig eva ion. See a c ketch with a comparison of the
two models. There ae small devi t the dimens I ing.
PREPARED BY: Ko ioE: 22 Jan. 1
REJECTION K LEADER CO S: DATE:
REJECTIO 0 RIGINAL DESIGN 0 MMENTS BY: DATE:
B. REVIEW BY GA TASK COMMENTS
6/AGREE PF]S VALID BY DATE
0 REQUEST RE-REVIEW BY DATE
0 DISAGREE- BY DATE
D .flREVEWH.F0RIGINAL DESIGL100GS. COMMENTS BY: DATE:
Top Related