Download - First language use_in_the_second_language_classroom

Transcript
Page 1: First language use_in_the_second_language_classroom

First Language Use in the Second Language

Classroom

SEMIR TESKEREDŽIĆ AND MINELA KERLA

UNIVERSITY OF ZENICA

Page 2: First language use_in_the_second_language_classroom

The use of First Language in L2 classroom

OTeacher use- Give instructions- Explain complex ideas- Explain complex grammar pointsOStudent use- Clarify meanings- Intercommunication

Page 3: First language use_in_the_second_language_classroom

Teaching Methods

OThe Holistic Approach- InteractiveOThe Silent Way- Seldom use of L1OTotal Physical Response- Close to total immersion

Page 4: First language use_in_the_second_language_classroom

Implications of L1 use in the classroom

OAffective Filter Hypothesis- Managing different levels of inputOLanguage Anxiety- Test anxiety- Fear of negative evaluationOClassroom Management - L1 or L2 orders

Page 5: First language use_in_the_second_language_classroom

MethodologyHypotheses

O H1: There is statistically significant correlation between defined variables SPINOP, SPINON, SOSA, KLSI, L1 L2

O H2: There is statistically significant correlation between defined variables SPINOP, SPINON, SOSA, KLSI, L1 L2 and age.

O H3: There is statistically significant correlation between defined variables SPINOP, SPINON, SOSA, KLSI, L1L2 and gender.

Page 6: First language use_in_the_second_language_classroom

Sample and Procedure

O The survey included 60 respondents (40 girls and 20 boys) in the Elementary school “Kiseljak 1” in Hrastovi, municipality Kiseljak.

Page 7: First language use_in_the_second_language_classroom

Procedure

O Testing was conducted in groups during the day in Elementary school “Kiseljak 1”. It lasted for a lesson, or 45 minutes and was conducted in the school year. Respondents were given the battery of four instruments with instructions on completing. Students, who did not understand the tests, raised their hands and instructors have been gave them answers.

Page 8: First language use_in_the_second_language_classroom

The Questionnaire

O SPIN (Positive and Negative Affect Schedule) is the scale of positive and negative feelings. The scale was constructed Waston, Clark and Tellegen

O SOSA (Repišti i Kerla , 2011) is social self-esteem scale. O The Learning Style Inventory is derived from an

experiential theory and model of learning developed by Kolb (1984). It is a practical self-assessment instrument that can help us assess our unique learning styles,

O L1L2 (Kerla i Teskeredžić 2013) is scale for measures preferences of students in using L1 while learning L2. It consists of 6 claims and Likert-type 5 degrees scale.

Page 9: First language use_in_the_second_language_classroom

Data Processing

O Statistical analysis is carried out through quantitative methods in SPSS and used the following method: Pearson product- moment correlation coefficient (r) form to calculate the correlation of two variables.

Page 10: First language use_in_the_second_language_classroom

ResultsO The results of our study, we

conducted in Elementary school “Kiseljak 1”, on a sample of 60 respondents, were summarized and presented in a table.

Page 11: First language use_in_the_second_language_classroom

Correlations SPINOP SPINON SOSA L1L2 KLSICE KLSIRO KLSIAC KLSIAE

GENDER AGE SPINOP SPINON SOSA

L1

L2 KLSICE KLSIRO KLSIAC KLSIAE

GENDER1 -,052 -,023 -,128 ,095 -,098 -,196 -,109 -,111 ,077

AGE1 -,452(**) -,007 -,062 ,082 ,222 -,116 -,119 -,146

SPINOP

1 ,070 ,318(*) ,112 -,039 ,143 ,153,365(**

)

SPINON1 ,058 ,136 ,135 -,097 -,009 ,046

SOSA1 -,013 ,216 -,034 -,117 ,086

L1L21 ,086 ,126 -,006 ,206

KLSICE

1 -,183 ,155 -,284(*)

KLSIRO1 ,150 -,147

KLSIAC1 ,094

KLSIAE1

Page 12: First language use_in_the_second_language_classroom

Based on these results, the upcoming part will be regarding the hypothesis,

approval them or rejection them. O H1: There is statistically significant correlation between defined

variables SPINOP, SPINON, SOSA, KLSI, L1 L2O Based on the results presented in the table 1 it can be concluded that there are

statistically significant differences between following variables (negative and statistically significant correlation between SPINOP and AGE = -0,45(**), positive and statistically significant correlation between SPINOP and SOSA=0,31(*), positive and statistically significant correlation between SPINOP and KLSIAE=0,36(**), negative and statistically significant intercorrelation between CE and AE=-0,28(*)). This hypothesis is partially affirmed.

O H2: There is statistically significant correlation between defined variables SPINOP, SPINON, SOSA, KLSI, L1L2 and age.

O Based on the results presented in the table 1 it can be concluded that there are statistically significant differences between following variables (negative and statistically significant correlation between SPINOP and AGE =0,45(**)). This hypothesis is partially affirmed.

O H3: There is statistically significant correlation between defined variables SPINOP, SPINON, SOSA, KLSI, L1L2 and gender.

O Based on the results presented in the table 1 there are no statistically significant differences therefore this hypothesis is disproven.

Page 13: First language use_in_the_second_language_classroom

ConclusionO Based on our research it can be concluded that the

lower the age is the higher is the perception of positive school image and that the positive school perception is in positive correlation with social self-esteem as well as with active experimentation. It can be said that the learning style based on concrete experience positively correlated with active experimentation which leads to the conclusion that the children who are open to positive perceptions and evaluation have higher social self-esteem and they are more open to concrete experiences and active experimentation. On the other side preferences of the L1 method does not have any statistically significant correlation with either of the fore mentioned variables which is interesting piece of information for L2 teachers.

Page 14: First language use_in_the_second_language_classroom

Research Implications

O Our research has been done on 60 respondents which presents the limits of the study because one can’t generalize the results. The use of L1 in L2 classroom being the theme of the research can be but doesn’t have to be used.

O As the implication for the future research we suggest to increase the number of respondents as well as including more variables such as: openness for the experiences and other background variables.

O As the implication of this research it is needed to question the use of other teaching methods on the concrete results and then compare them with these results.

Page 15: First language use_in_the_second_language_classroom

Thank you!