7/27/2019 Fatigue damage behaviors of carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy composites containing nanoclay
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fatigue-damage-behaviors-of-carbon-fiber-reinforced-epoxy-composites-containing 1/9
Fatigue damage behaviors of carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy composites
containing nanoclay
Shafi Ullah Khan a, Arshad Munir b, Rizwan Hussain b, Jang-Kyo Kim a,⇑
a Department of Mechanical Engineering, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Clear Water Bay Kowloon, Hong Kong b National Engineering and Scientific Commission, P.O. Box 2801, Islamabad, Pakistan
a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history:
Received 13 February 2010
Received in revised form 19 June 2010
Accepted 5 August 2010
Available online 11 August 2010
Keywords:
A. Nanoclay
A. Carbon fiber
B. Fatigue
B. Interfacial strength
C. Damage tolerance
a b s t r a c t
The effects of nanoclay inclusion on cyclic fatigue behavior and residual properties of carbon fiber-rein-
forced composites (CFRPs) after fatigue have been studied. The tension–tension cyclic fatigue tests are
conducted at various load levels to establish the S-N curve. The residual strength and modulus are mea-
sured at different stages of fatigue cycles. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and scanning acoustic
microscopy (SAM) are employed to characterize the underlying fatigue damage mechanisms and progres-
sive damage growth. The incorporation of nanoclay into CFRP composites not only improves the mechan-
ical properties of the composite in static loading, but also the fatigue life for a given cyclic load level and
the residual mechanical properties after a given period of cyclic fatigue. The corresponding fatigue dam-
age area is significantly reduced due to nanoclay. Nanoclay serves to suppress and delay delamination
damage growth and eventual failure by improving the fiber/matrix interfacial bond and through the for-
mation of nanoclay-induced dimples.
2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Carbon fiber-reinforced composites (CFRPs) are widely used as
structural material in load bearing applications because of high
strength and stiffness, dimensional and thermal stability, and cor-
rosion resistance. Fatigue is known to be oneof the primaryreasons
for failure in many structural materials, including CFRPs [1–3].
When subject to cyclic loading, CFRPs exhibit gradual degradation
of the mechanical and structural performance as a result of damage
accumulation. The nature of fatigue damage in CFRPs is very com-
plicated and is quite different from those of isotropic materials.
The damage states are closely related to the anisotropy and heter-
ogeneity which leads to the formation of different stress levels
depending on the lay-up sequence and orientation of laminate.
The fatigue damage modes in CFRPs include combinations of inter-
facial debonding, matrix cracking, delamination, fiber breakage, etc.
Early work on unidirectional CFRP laminates under tensile fatigue
loading displayed a high degree of resistance before sudden cata-
strophic failure [4]. However, when the matrix was more highly
loaded such as laminates with off-axis fiber orientations, the re-
sponse was completely different: there were multiple mechanisms
of failure throughout the material involving combinations of fiber
and matrix damage interaction. The fatigue behavior of on-axis
specimens was influenced by the stochastic breakage of brittle fiber
bundles, whereas that of off-axis angle-ply was strongly affected by
the inelastic shear deformation and crack propagation of the ductile
polymer matrix [5]. Similar conclusions were drawn in a recent
study where the failure modes were as much related to the cyclic
stress as to the off-axis angle [6]. For on-axis specimens the failure
modes were fiber-dominated and matrix-dominated when high
and low cyclic stresses, respectively, were applied. In sharp con-
trast, for off-axis specimens the failure mode was always matrix-
dominated irrespective of the stress level.
Thermosetting epoxy resin systems are widely employed as
matrix materials for composites in many fields such as aerospace,
automotive and microelectronics. Toughening of epoxies has been
one of the topics most extensively studied because of the brittle
nature of epoxies and their widespread applications for engineer-
ing components. Understanding the fatigue crack propagation
behaviors of epoxy composites has been of great importance be-
cause such composites are often used for engineering components
that are subject to cyclic loading. Curtis [7] found that the tough-
ened resin system can improve the tensile fatigue response in
the low cycle fatigue regime, while in the high-cycle fatigue range
the fatigue performance of the toughened epoxy is inferior to that
of standard epoxy-based composites. Epoxy matrices with a high
ductility exhibited a higher compressive fatigue resistance [8].
The mode I delamination fatigue crack growth was studied of
interlayer/interleaf-toughened CFRP laminates [9]. The heteroge-
neous interlayer with fine polyamide particles increased the crack
growth resistance.
0266-3538/$ - see front matter 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.08.004
⇑ Corresponding author. Tel.: +852 23587207; fax: +852 23581543.
E-mail address: [email protected] (J.-K. Kim).
Composites Science and Technology 70 (2010) 2077–2085
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Composites Science and Technology
j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / c o m p s c i t e c h
7/27/2019 Fatigue damage behaviors of carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy composites containing nanoclay
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fatigue-damage-behaviors-of-carbon-fiber-reinforced-epoxy-composites-containing 2/9
Although many research efforts have been directed toward
understanding the mechanisms of fatigue in polymer matrix com-
posites, the effects of nanoparticles on their fatigue performance is
still not fully understood. The addition of 1 wt% of carbon nano-
tubes (CNTs) to the matrix of glass fiber-epoxy composite lami-
nates improved their high-cycle fatigue life by a remarkable 60–
250% [10]. Even more impressively, the addition of 2 and 5 wt%
multi-walled CNTs enhanced the fatigue performance of physio-
logically maintained methyl methacrylate–styrene copolymer
(MMA-co-sty) by 565 and 593%, respectively [11]. Zhang et al.
[3] demonstrated an order of magnitude reduction in fatigue crack
propagation rate for an epoxy system with the addition of 0.5 wt%
of CNTs. The crack-tip bridging and frictional pull-out mechanisms
were responsible for the suppression of fatigue in the nanocom-
posite. Other types of nanofillers also gave rise to improved frac-
ture properties. For example, the introduction of SiO2 particles
increased both the initiation fracture toughness and the corre-
sponding cyclic fatigue behavior of epoxy [12]. Al2O3 and TIO2
nanoparticles improved the flexural strength, stiffness and fracture
toughness as well as the fatigue crack propagation resistance of the
epoxy [13]. The incorporation of organoclay in polyurethane elas-
tomers showed significantly improved fatigue life in addition to
more than 150% increase in static strength and failure strain [14].
Many studies have devoted to improving the mechanical prop-
erties of fiber-reinforced composites by adding nanoclay. In addi-
tion to mechanical properties, clay-epoxy nanocomposites have
shown wide array of property improvements with only very low
fractions of clay, including the enhanced thermal stability
[15,16], reduced moisture and gas permittivity [17] and superior
flame retardancy [18]. The nanoclay, in particular, exhibited ame-
liorating effects on fracture and fatigue resistance of carbon fiber
composites (CFRPs): e.g. increased mode 1 delamination resistance
[19], enhanced impact damage resistance and tolerance [20] and
better static and impact fracture toughness [21]. However, very
few studies have appeared in the open literature on fatigue perfor-
mance of hybrid CFRP composites containing nanoclay. As a con-
tinuation of our previous studies on clay-CFRP hybrid composites[19–21], this work specifically studies the fatigue performance of
CFRP composites affected by the incorporation of nanoclay. The
S-N curves and the residual properties of hybrid composites after
tension–tension cyclic loads of different levels were specifically
evaluated.
2. Experiments
2.1. Materials and fabrication of composite laminates
The laminate composites were fabricated from unidirectional
carbon fiber and organoclay filled epoxy resin. The epoxy resin sys-
tem was basically the same as that employed in our previous stud-ies [19–21]: a diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A (DGEBA) epoxy
(Epon828, supplied by Shell Corp) mixed with 1,3-phenylenedi-
amine (supplied by Aldrich) hardener at a ratio of 100:14.5 by
weight. Unidirectional carbon fabric (supplied by Taiwan electrical
insulators) with a unit weight of 200 g/m2 was used as the main
reinforcement for composite laminates. The organoclay, Nanomer
I30P (supplied by Nanocor), is an octadeclyamine modified mont-
morillonite suitable for dispersion in epoxy resins [17]. The
organoclay was dried overnight at 75 C in an oven prior to use.
The epoxy in a glass beaker was heated at 75 C to lower the vis-
cosity and the organoclay was added. The organoclay content
was varied between 0, 3, and 5 wt% of the epoxy resin-hardener
mixture. Mixing was conducted at a shear rate of 3000 rpm for
1 h using a high speed shear mixer (Ross Mixer). The mixturewas subjected to sonication using an ultrasonicator (Branson
2510) at an ultrahigh frequency for 3 h to further disperse the clay,
while maintaining the resin temperature at 75 C using a hot water
bath. After sonication, the translucent color of the epoxy/clay mix-
ture indicates uniform distribution of organoclays, partly confirm-
ing the efficiency of the sonication conditions used. The mixture
was degassed in a vacuum oven followed by addition of curing
agent, and the mixture was stirred while avoiding the formation
of bubbles. Twelve ply laminates of 30 cm square were prepared
by hand lay-up of carbon fabrics with a stacking sequence [0/
90]3S on a steel mould plate. To keep fabrics well aligned, necessary
precautions were taken during hand lay-up. The molded laminates
were wrapped with bleeders and peel plies within Teflon dam all
around, which was cured at 80 C for 2 h and at 150 C for 8 h, fol-
lowed by post-cure at 160 C for 2 h in a vacuum hot press (Tech-
nical Machine Product Corp). The high cure temperature
excursions for long durations were aimed at complete cure of the
resin. The cured composite laminates were cut, by a diamond
wheel, at 45 off-axis directions to obtain a resultant stacking se-
quence of [±45]3S. Introduction of clay into epoxy inevitably in-
creases the viscosity of the resin, which may result in composite
laminates thicker than those without clay. To lower the viscosity
and thus to avoid the thickness variation, the resin was heated to
75 C during the whole processing steps, including shear mixing,
sonication and degassing, as well as before hand lay-up after mix-
ing with the hardener. A uniform laminate thickness and a con-
stant fiber volume fraction were further assured through the use
of Teflon dams of required thickness and a constant pressure of
0.32 MPa during curing. The volume fraction of carbon fibers, V f ,
was consistently maintained at about 0.55 for both the composites
with and without nanoclay, which was determined from the
known weights and densities of the composite constituents.
2.2. Characterization, static and cyclic fatigue tests
The static tensile tests were conducted according to the specifi-
cation, ASTM D3039, on a universal testing machine (MTS Sintex
10/D) to determine the tensile strength and modulus. Rectangularspecimens of 230 mm long 20 mm wide 2.5 mm thick were
loaded at a crosshead speed of 2 mm/min. An extensometer with
gauge length of 25 mm was attached to the specimen to monitor
the strain during loading.
The tension–tension cyclic fatigue tests were conducted accord-
ing to the specification, ASTM D3479, on a universal testing ma-
chine (25 KN servo-hydraulic Instron 1300). The tests were
conducted at room temperature on a load control mode at a stress
ratio of 0.1, and with constant-amplitude sine-wave loading. To
determine the fatigue S-N curves, the maximum stress levels were
kept at 80, 70, 60 and 45% of the corresponding ultimate tensile
strength (UTS) of the composite. A test frequency of 2 Hz was used
which was low enough to minimize the effect of adiabatic heating.
Rectangular specimens, 230 mm long, 20 mm wide and 2.5 mmthick, were cut from the composite plates, and end tabs made of
glass fabrics and 40 mm long were bonded at both ends of the
specimen to avoid failure around the gripping device during the
tests. At least four specimens were tested for each set of loading
conditions. The residual properties of the composites were mea-
sured after different periods of fatigue loading at a maximum load
equivalent to 60% of the ultimate tensile strength of the composite.
Static tensile tests were conducted on the pre-cycled specimens to
measure the residual tensile strength and modulus. The tests fol-
lowed the same procedure as those for the static tensile properties
on virgin specimens.
The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to examine
the surface morphologies of the static and fatigue fractured speci-
mens and thus to identify the different failure mechanisms in-volved in CFRPs with and without nanoclay. The scanning
2078 S.U. Khan et al. / Composites Science and Technology 70 (2010) 2077–2085
7/27/2019 Fatigue damage behaviors of carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy composites containing nanoclay
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fatigue-damage-behaviors-of-carbon-fiber-reinforced-epoxy-composites-containing 3/9
acoustic microscopy (SAM, Sonix Micro-Scan System) was em-
ployed to characterize the progressive fatigue damage growth at
different stages of fatigue cycles. A focused acoustic beam was
scanned over the damaged laminate using a transducer equipped
with a 35 MHz probe in a through-transmission mode. Both the
neat CFRP composites and the hybrid composites containing
5 wt% nanoclay were examined before loading and after 5 K,
10 K, 20 K, 25 K and 30 K fatigue cycles. For ease of understanding
only two colors, black and grey, were used to present the damage
state and a threshold value of 10% was used as the border line be-
tween the two colors.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Static tensile properties
Fig. 1 presents a typical TEM image of nanocomposites with
5 wt% clay content, indicating a mixture of full intercalation and
partial exfoliation. Representative stress–strain curves obtained
fromthe static tensile tests are shown in Fig. 2. All materials exhib-
ited a typical bilinear stress–strain behavior before failure. As re-
ported previously [22–24], the tensile stress–strain curves for
angle-ply specimens are non-linear due to the significant contribu-
tion of the polymer matrix. It is clearly seen that both the yield
strength and the failure strain increased with increasing the clay
content. Fig. 3 summarizes the static tensile strength and modulusof clay-CFRP hybrid composites containing varying clay contents.
Both the tensile strength and modulus increase continuously with
increasing clay content, which is again a reflection of the compos-
ite property significantly affected by the matrix property. This
observation is generally consistent with the flexural properties re-
ported earlier [21] although the flexural strength tended to be mar-
ginally reduced at a high clay content due to the potential lack of
dispersion of clay.
The fracture surface morphologies as shown in Fig. 4 exhibited
sharp contrast between the composites without and with 5 wt%
nanoclay. Interfacial debonding between the fiber and matrix, as
well as limited deformation of matrix material are the major fail-
ure mechanisms observed in the composites without clay. The
fracture surface was generally smooth and featureless indicatingbrittle failure. Meanwhile, the clay-CFRP hybrid composites re-
vealed improved fiber–matrix interfacial bonding due to the pres-
ence of nanoclay in the matrix material that maximizes the stress
transfer between matrix and fiber. The modified epoxy adhered
well to the long carbon fibers and the fracture surface was rougher
and textured, quite similar to those observed from the interlaminar
fracture surfaces [19]. It is thought that the octadecylamine modi-
fier used for I.30P organoclay had alkyl and amine groups that are
functionally compatible with carbon fibers to give rise to strong
adhesion [20]. Similar amine groups have been extensively used
to functionalize carbon nanotubes/nanofibers for polymer compos-
Fig. 1. Typical TEM image of nanocomposite containing 5 wt.% clay, showing
dispersion state of nanoclay.
Fig. 2. Representative stress–strain curves of clay-CFRP hybrid composites.
Fig. 3. Tensile properties of clay-CFRP hybrid composites containing varying clay contents.
S.U. Khan et al. / Composites Science and Technology 70 (2010) 2077–2085 2079
7/27/2019 Fatigue damage behaviors of carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy composites containing nanoclay
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fatigue-damage-behaviors-of-carbon-fiber-reinforced-epoxy-composites-containing 4/9
ite applications, which may also be responsible for the improved
adhesion between the modified epoxy and ultra-high molecular
weight polyethylene fibers [25]. It is well known that the proper-
ties of the composites with [±45]S ply orientation are dominated
by the in-plane shear properties, which is further confirmed by
the general view of the failed specimen shown in Fig. 5a. The inter-
laminar shear and in-plane shear are considered to be the matrixdominated properties [26]. It was noted (Fig. 2) that the presence
of nanoclay in the matrix not only increased the apparent yield
stress but also the strain to failure, which is consistent with the
previous observations of improved interlaminar shear strength
(ILSS) [19,27] and in-plane shear strength of fiber composites [28].
3.2. Fatigue life and residual strength
Fig. 6 presents the S-N data of clay-CFRP hybrid composite at
varying clay contents. For the same level of maximum applied
stress, the clay-CFRP hybrid composite exhibited much longer fati-
gue life than the composite without clay at all the stress levels
tested. A maximum improvement of about 74% in fatigue lifewas achieved with 3 wt% clay when cyclic fatigue was carried
out at a load equivalent to 45% of the tensile strength of the spec-
imen. Results indicated that nanoclay modification produced more
improvement in fatigue life at a low stress or a high cycle regime
and was less potent in improving life at high stress levels. At high
Fig. 4. Fracture surface morphologies of CFRP composites: (a and b) without clay and (c and d) with 5 wt.% clay.
Fig. 5. Images of the failed specimens from (a) static tension and (b) cyclic fatigue.
2080 S.U. Khan et al. / Composites Science and Technology 70 (2010) 2077–2085
7/27/2019 Fatigue damage behaviors of carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy composites containing nanoclay
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fatigue-damage-behaviors-of-carbon-fiber-reinforced-epoxy-composites-containing 5/9
stress levels the nanoparticles are less resistive in suppressing the
rapidly propagating cracks. This was explained on the basis of
stress intensities or strain densities [10,11]. At high stress levels
the fatigue crack grow at a rapid rate and at several fronts becauseof the high stress intensity and high strain density, respectively.
The nanoparticles become relatively ineffective in slowing down
the onset or subsequent growth of damage at high stress
intensities.
Fig. 7 shows the residual tensile strength and modulus mea-
sured after a given number of cycles. The residual properties exhib-
ited a gradual decrease with increase in number of cycles with
small variations between specimens. The nanoclay-modified com-
posite showed higher residual properties than those without
throughout the whole fatigue life. Judging from the typical images
of failed specimens in Fig. 5b, in-plane shear, instead of fiber break-
age, is the primary failure mode. Since no stochastic fiber failure
was involved, erratic changes in the residual strength and modulus
were not observed, further details of the latter will be discussed in
Section 3.4.
3.3. Fatigue damage index
Amongst several methods to characterize the extent of damage
arising from cyclic fatigue, the ‘fatigue damage index’ was em-
ployed in this study. The fatigue damage index, D, is defined as:
D ¼ 1 E r
E oð1Þ
where E is the modulus of specimen, with the subscripts o and r
referring to the undamaged state and residual value after a certain
fatigue life. D varies between 0 and I, and a low D value means little
modulus reduction due to fatigue. Thus, D is a macroscopic measure
of fatigue damage because the structural changes on the micro-
scopic scale (due to matrix cracks, fiber/matrix interfacial failure,
etc.) are characterized by a macroscopic reduction of the modulus[29–32]. Fig. 8 shows the damage index, D, plotted a function of fa-
tigue cycles for hybrid composites containing different clay con-
tents. It can be seen that at the early stage of fatigue (say, 0–
12.5 k cycles) the hybrid composites in general exhibited margin-
ally more damage than the neat composites. After the initial dam-
age period, the hybrid composite specimens sustained a relatively
longer stable period with low damage indices for the rest of fatigue
life. The final failure took place much earlier in the neat composite
than the clay-CFRP hybrid composites; and the higher was the clay
content, the longer was the fatigue life, with the exception of the
hybrid composites containing 5 wt% clay. The diminishing improve-
ment in fatigue life at clay contents higher than 3 wt% is attributed
to the higher possibility of forming unwanted agglomerates of a rel-
atively large size.
The early stage is generally considered as the crack initiation
stage. The hybrid composites have a large number of interfaces
due to the presence of nanoclay, and there are many weak inter-
faces between the clay galleries. The cleavage of clay tactoids or
the inter-gallery debonding might have occurred during this early
stage of fatigue generating micro or nanoscale cracks. It is likely,
however, that these micro or nanocracks took significantly longer
time to coalesce and propagate to form critical damage than in
the neat CFRP composites. Other important toughening mecha-
nisms responsible for the enhanced crack growth resistance of-
fered by nanoclay have been identified previously [18–
21,27,33,34]. Nanoclay can serve as the trigger for crack deflection,
Fig. 6. S-N Curves of clay-CFRP hybrid composites with varying clay contents.
Fig. 7. Residual fatigue properties: (a) strength and (b) modulus. Fig. 8. Fatigue damage variable, D, plotted as function of fatigue life.
S.U. Khan et al. / Composites Science and Technology 70 (2010) 2077–2085 2081
7/27/2019 Fatigue damage behaviors of carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy composites containing nanoclay
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fatigue-damage-behaviors-of-carbon-fiber-reinforced-epoxy-composites-containing 6/9
pinning, as well as crack arrest mechanisms, which significantly in-
crease the fracture toughness. These mechanisms could also be
operative to retard fatigue failure by preventing or slowing the
damage buildup through fatigue crack growth, especially at the la-
ter stage of fatigue.
3.4. Fatigue damage mechanisms
Fig. 9 shows SEM micrographs of fractured specimens that were
fatigued at 80%, 60% and 45% of UTS of the CFRP composites with-
out and with 5 wt% clay. Both composites showed a number of
Fig. 9. SEM images showing fatigue fracture surfaces of the specimens failed at different maximum stress levels: (a) neat CFRP composites and (b) 5 wt.% clay-CFRP hybrid
composites.
Fig. 10. SEM micrographs of 5 wt.% clay-CFRP hybrid composite, showing improved fiber–matrix and particle–matrix interfacial bonding.
2082 S.U. Khan et al. / Composites Science and Technology 70 (2010) 2077–2085
7/27/2019 Fatigue damage behaviors of carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy composites containing nanoclay
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fatigue-damage-behaviors-of-carbon-fiber-reinforced-epoxy-composites-containing 7/9
dimples on the fracture surface. The dimples are formed as results
of highly localized deformation around matrix defects, microvoids
or nanoparticles [35,36]. It is interesting to note that the size of
these dimples in general increased in both width and depth with
decreasing the stress level applied during fatigue or alternatively
with an increase in fatigue life. The mechanisms behind the forma-
tion and growth of dimples can be explained as follows: microcrac-
kes are formed during the early stage of fatigue loading at some
weak locations where there are high stress concentrations. Local-
ized plastic deformation occurs due to the strain concentration
around these microcracks, which in turn promotes the formation
of dimples. The lower the applied stress level, the longer this stage
lasts. Dimples grow in a stable fashion with increasing number of
fatigue cycles before they coalescence into major cracks and final
failure. At high stress levels, they tend to coalescence rapidly, lead-
ing to premature fracture without extensive growth of deep and
wide dimples. These observations suggest that the elongation or
stretching of the localized deformation zones or dimples is highly
dependent on the applied stress.
Indeed, the morphology of the nanoclay-induced dimples is
considerably different from those present in neat composite. The
neat composites had generally wider and shallower dimples than
the nanoclay hybrid composites. There was significant difference
in size of these dimples for a given maximum stress level, espe-
cially at a low stress or high cycle regime: e.g. at 45% of UTS level
these cavities are about 4–6 and 2–3 lm wide in the neat and hy-
brid composites, respectively. For a given fractured cross-sectional
area, there were more dimples of smaller sizes in the hybrid sys-
Fig. 11. SAM images showing progressive fatigue damage growth at different stages of fatigue life.
S.U. Khan et al. / Composites Science and Technology 70 (2010) 2077–2085 2083
7/27/2019 Fatigue damage behaviors of carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy composites containing nanoclay
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fatigue-damage-behaviors-of-carbon-fiber-reinforced-epoxy-composites-containing 8/9
tem than in the neat system. Similar dimple patterns were also
found near the pre-cracked region of fractured PA/nano-TIO2 and
PA/nano-SIO2 composites [35,36] where the density of dimples
was much higher and the size was much smaller in the nanocom-
posites than in the neat PA66. In addition, there is significant anal-
ogy between our findings and those reported previously on glass
fiber composites (GFRPs) containing carbon nanotubes (CNTs)
[10] in terms of crack density: the addition of CNTs into the com-
posites resulted in a higher density of nanoscale cracks than the
composites without CNTs.
It is also worth noting that the nanoclay-induced dimples are
often divided into sub-partitions as evidenced from Figs. 9b and
10. There appears to be distinct partitioning lines emerging from
clay particles in the center to the periphery of the dimples. These
dividing walls significantly increased the density of dimples and
the total fracture surface area. The increased surface area implies
meandering crack tips during crack growth, consequently resulting
in high energy dissipation. The increased number of distinct parti-
tioning lines in hybrid composites containing nanoclay is again an
indication of simultaneous initiation and growth of small cracks in
a large density, in contrast to larger cracks in a low density in the
neat composite. Nevertheless, the static fracture surfaces in both
the hybrid and neat composites did not show any sign of these
dimples. The rapid crack propagation at a high stress intensity
and a high loading speed did not allow the matrix material with
enough time to stretch and plastically deform into these dimples.
The clay/matrix interfacial bond appears to be very strong even
when the clay was agglomerated to a microscale. The strong inter-
facial bond gave rise to magnification of the strain that the matrix
material between the nanoparticles could sustain.
3.5. Characterization of fatigue damage growth
The SAM technique was employed in a through-transmission
mode [37–39] to monitor the progressive damage growth due to
cyclic fatigue and the representative SAM images are shown inFig. 11. The corresponding damage area divided by the total area
within the gauge length is plotted as a function of life cycles in
Fig. 12. Black color (Fig. 11) represents the sound waves that are
less than the threshold value and are absorbed by the composite,
thus is an indication of damage. Grey color represents the sound
waves that pass through the composites and are received at the re-
ceiver unit, and thus is an indication of bonded region. The slight
variation in the grey color intensity occurred because of the den-
sity variation of fiber, matrix and the particle rich areas, which in
turn changed the extent of received waves.
Both materials exhibited quite uniform damage distributions
over the whole gauge area until damage became more concen-
trated at the later stage. It is seen that the hybrid composites
exhibited slightly more damage than the neat composites at the
very early stage of loading at below about 10 k cycles. This obser-
vation is functionally very similar to the damage index variation
discussed in Section 3.3 (Fig. 8). Except the early stage, the clay-
CFRP hybrid composite showed in general much less damage than
the neat composite throughout the whole fatigue life. The clay-
CFRP hybrid composites sustained about 15% more damage before
final failure than the neat composites, confirming substantially
higher damage-tolerant characteristics. Based on the above obser-
vations, the fatigue damage in the laminate composites studied
here can be divided into two stages: Stage I for damage initiation
and stable damage growth; and Stage II for rapid damage growth
to failure. It is seen that the hybrid composites had a longer Stage
I period than the neat composites (i.e. approximately 0–20 k cycles
vs 0–15 k cycles).
4. Conclusions
The tension–tension fatigue behavior of clay-CFRP hybrid com-posite was investigated and the prevalent toughening mechanisms
arising from nanoclay were identified. The following conclusions
can be highlighted from this study.
(1) The static tensile strength and modulus of CFRP composite
were significantly enhanced by the addition of nanoclay.
The presence of nanoclay in the matrix increased the appar-
ent yield strength and strain to failure.
(2) The clay-CFRP hybrid composites showed better perfor-
mance in terms of residual tensile strength and modulus
than the neat composite after a given fatigue cycle.
(3) Fatigue life was significantly extended with the incorpora-
tion of nanoclay to CFRP composite and the maximum
improvement was about 74% with 3 wt% clay content.(4) Nanoclay suppressed the fatigue damage growth of CFRP
composites in terms of damage area over the whole fatigue
life except the very early stage of loading.
(5) Improved fiber/matrix interfacial bond and nanoclay-
induced dimples were identified as underlying toughening
mechanisms responsible for the enhanced fatigue life of
clay-CFRP hybrid composites.
References
[1] Dauskardt RH, Ritchie RO, Cox BN. Fatigue of advance materials. Adv Mater
Process 1993;7:26–31.
[2] Zhang W, Picu RC, Koratkar N. The effect of carbon nanotube dimensions anddispersion on the fatigue behavior of epoxy nanocomposites. Nanotechnology
2008;19:285709.
[3] Zhang W, Picu RC, Koratkar N. Suppression of fatigue crack growth in carbon
nanotube composites. Appl Phys Lett 2007;92:193109.
[4] Salkind MJ. Fatigue of composites. In: Composite materials: testing and design,
2nd conf, ASTM STP 497. American Society for Testing and Materials; 1972. p.
143–169.
[5] Gamstedt EK, Redon O, Brondsted P. Fatigue dissipation and failure in
unidirectional and angle-ply glass fiber/carbon fiber hybrid laminates. Key
Eng Mater 2002;221–222:35–48.
[6] Philippidis TP, Vassilopoulos AP. Fatigue of composite laminates under off-axis
loading. Int J Fatigue 1999;21:253–62.
[7] Curtis PT. The fatigue behavior of fibrous composite materials. J Strain Anal
1989;24(4):235–44.
[8] Swanson SR, Cairns DS, Guyll ME, Johnson D. Compression fatigue response for
carbon fiber with conventional and toughened epoxy matrices with damage. J
Eng Mater Tech 1993;115:116–21.
[9] Hojo M, Matsuda S, Tanaka M, Ochiai S, Murakami A. Mode 1 delamination
fatigue properties of interlayer-toughened CF/Epoxy laminates. Compos SciTechnol 2006;66:665–75.
Fig. 12. Damaged area divided by total gauge area plotted as a function of fatiguelife.
2084 S.U. Khan et al. / Composites Science and Technology 70 (2010) 2077–2085
7/27/2019 Fatigue damage behaviors of carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy composites containing nanoclay
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fatigue-damage-behaviors-of-carbon-fiber-reinforced-epoxy-composites-containing 9/9
[10] Grimmer CS, Dharan CKH. High-cycle fatigue of hybrid carbon nanotube/glass
fiber/polymer composites. J Mater Sci 2008;43:4487–92.
[11] Marrs B, Andrews R, Pienkowski D. Multiwall carbon nanotubes enhance the
fatigue performance of physiologically maintained methyl methacrylate–
styrene copolymer. Carbon 2007;45:2098–104.
[12] Blackman BRK, Kinloch AJ, Lee JS, Taylor AC, Agrawal R, Schueneman G, et al.
The fracture and fatigue behavior of nano-modified epoxy polymers. J Mater
Sci 2007;42:7049–51.
[13] Wetzel B, Rosso P, Haupert F, Friedrich K. Epoxy nanocomposites-fracture and
toughening mechanisms. Eng Frac Mech 2006;73:2375–98.
[14] Song M, Yao KJ. X-ray diffraction detection of compliance in polyurethane-organoclay nanocomposites. Mater Sci Technol 2004;20:989–93.
[15] YasminA, Luo JJ, Abot JL, Danial IM.Mechanical andthermal behaviour of clay/
epoxy nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 2006;66:2415–22.
[16] Lin LY, Lee J-H, Hong CE, Yoo GH, Advani SG. Preparation and characterization
of layered silicate/glass fiber/epoxy hybrid nanocomposites via vacuum-
assisted resin transfer molding. Compos Sci Technol 2006;66:2116–25.
[17] Kim JK, Hu CG, Woo RSC, Sham ML. Moisture barrier characteristics of
organoclay–epoxy nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 2005;65:805–13.
[18] Gilman JW, Kashiwagi T. Polymer-layered silicate nanocomposites with
conventional flame retardants. In: Pinnavaia TJ, Beall GW, editors. Polymer-
clay nanocomposites. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2000.
[19] Siddiqui NA, Woo RSC, Kim JK, Leung CKY, Munir A. Mode I interlaminar
fracture behavior and mechanical properties of CFRPs with nanoclay-filled
epoxy matrix. Composites Part A 2007;38:449–60.
[20] Iqbal K, Khan SU, Munir A, Kim JK. Impact damage resistance of CFRP with
nanoclay-filled epoxy matrix. Compos Sci Technol 2009;69:1949–57.
[21] Khan SU, Iqbal K, Munir A, Kim JK. Quasi-static and impact fracture behaviors
of CFRPs with nanoclay-filled epoxy matrix. Composites Part A [in press].
[22] Khatri SC, Koczak MJ. Thick-section AS4-Graphite/E-Glass/PPS hybrid
composites: Part 1 tensile behavior. Compos Sci Technol 1996;56:181–92.
[23] Quaresimin M. Fatigue of woven composite laminates under tensile and
compressive loading. In: Proceedings of ECCM 10, Brugge; June 3–7, 2002.
[24] Wrenn MB, Corum JM, Battiste RL. Short termstatic and cyclic behavior of two
automotive carbon-fiber composites. Composites Part A 2003;34:731–41.
[25] Zhamu A, Zhong WH, Stone JJ. Experimental study on adhesion property of
UHMWPE fiber/nano-epoxy by fiber bundlepull-out tests. ComposSci Technol
2006;66:2736–42.
[26] Cho J, Chen JY, Daniel IM. Mechanical enhancement of carbon fiber/epoxy
composites by graphite nanoplatelet reinforcement. Scripta Mater
2007;56:685–8.
[27] Haque A, Shamsuzzoha M, Hussain F, Dean D. S2-Glass/epoxy polymer
nanocomposites: manufacturing, structures, thermal and mechanical
properties. J Compos Mater 2003;37:1821–37.
[28] Tsai JL, Wu MD. Organoclay effect on transverse tensile strength and in-plane
shear strength of unidirectional glass/epoxy nanocomposites. Key Eng Mater
2007;335:773–6.
[29] Highsmith AL, Reifsnider KL. Stiffness-reduction mechanisms in composite
laminates. In: Reifsnider KL, editor. Damage in composite materials. ASTM STP775. American Society for Testing and Materials; 1982. p. 103–17.
[30] Plumtree A, Shi L. Fatigue damage evolution in off-axis unidirectional CFRP. Int
J Fatigue 2002;24:155–9.
[31] Paepegem WV, Degrieck J. Anew coupled approach of residual stiffness and
strength for fatigue of fiber-reinforced composites. Int J Fatigue
2002;24:747–62.
[32] Masters JE, Reifsnider KL. An investigation of cumulative damage development
in quasi-isotropic graphite/epoxy laminates. In: Reifsnider KL, editor. Damage
in composite materials, ASTM STP 775. American Society for Testing and
Materials; 1982. p. 40–62.
[33] Xu Y, Hoa SV. Mechanical properties of carbon fiber reinforced epoxy/clay
nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 2008;68:854–61.
[34] Becker O, Varley RJ, Simon GP. Use of layered silicates to supplementary
toughen high performance epoxy-carbon fiber composites. J Mater Sci Lett
2003;22:1411–4.
[35] Yang JL, Zhang Z, Zhang H. The essentialwork of fracture of polyamide66 filled
with TiO2 nanoparticles. Compos Sci Technol 2005;65:2374–9.
[36] Zhang H, Zhang Z, Yang JL, Friedrich K. Temperature dependence of crack
initiation fracture toughness of various nanoparticles filled polyamide 66.
Polymer 2006;47:679–89.
[37] Tai NH, Ma CCM, Lin JM, Wu GY. Effects of thickness on the fatigue behavior of
quasi-isotropic carbon/epoxy composites before and after low energy impacts.
Compos Sci Technol 1999;59:1753–62.
[38] Gao SL, Kim JK. Scanning acoustic microscopy as a tool for quantitative
characterisation of damage in CFRPs. Compos Sci Technol 1999;59:345–54.
[39] KimJK, Sham ML.Impact anddelamination failureof woven fabric composites.
Compos Sci Technol 2000;60:745–61.
S.U. Khan et al. / Composites Science and Technology 70 (2010) 2077–2085 2085
Top Related