Export Strategy: Re-thinking the Basket of Exports
Premachandra Athukorala
Arndt-Corden Department of EconomicsCrawford School of Public Policy
Australian National [email protected]
1
2
Structure1. Analytical framework:
Determinants of export performance and
the case for product specific policy focus
2. Recent export performance: a comparative overview
3 Potential basket of exports:
lessons from the East Asian experience
3
1. Analytical framework
(a) Determinants of export performance
World demand versus domestic-supply factors
Consensus view based on the export experiences of developing countries during the post-World War era:
World demand is, of course, an important determinant of exports in the short-run, but in the medium to long-term, supply-related factors play the dominant role in determining a country’s relative export performance
World demand is not an engine, but simply a handmaiden of export growth of a given country
4
Supply side factors (a) Macroeconomic policy
Determine international competitiveness (profitability) of production of exports (and import-competing goods)
Key variables: exchange inflation, wages, and interest rates (each adjusted for inflation differential between the given country and its trading partners)
(b) Investment climate: stable enabling environment for the operation of the private sector
‘Good institutions’: law and order, property-right protection, political stability, policy certainty, openness to trade etc.
Particularly important for attracting export-oriented foreign direct investment, which plays a pivotal role in the expansion of manufacturing exports (discuss below)
5
Institutions
‘Institutions are the humanly devised constraints that structure human interaction. They are made up of formal constraints (e.g. rules, laws, constitutions), informal constraints (e.g. norms of behaviour, conventions, self-imposed codes of conduct), and their enforcement characteristics. Together they define the incentive structure of societies and specifically economies’
Douglass C. North (1994), ‘Economic Performance Through Time’, American
Economic Review, 84(3), 359-368.
6
(b) Product-specific policy focus
(Microeconomic policies/ incentive policies)
Not a must, private entrepreneurs know better than policy makers.
New export lines can emerge de novo if the macro-economic house and the domestic investment environment are in good shape.
(Examples from Sri Lanka)
7
(Continued from the previous slide)
but
can play an important supportive role , if• The supply-side prerequisites (discussed above) are met
and• Policies are designed by taking into account the country's
comparative advantage in international production and changing patterns of international production and trade
(Discuss examples from Singapore, Malaysia and Thailand)
8
2. Recent export performance A dramatic slow down of export growth (Figure 1),
Precipitous fall in Sri Lanka’s share in exports from developing countries
Sri Lanka has failed to share in the ‘the great transformation of world trade’ (Krugman 2008): the dramatic shift in manufacturing exports from developed to developing countries
So, Sri Lanka’s export problem is fundamentally ‘home grown’.
9
Figure 1: Sri Lanka: Exports and Imports as a percentage of GDP, 1990-2012
19901991
19921993
19941995
19961997
19981999
20002001
20022003
20042005
20062007
20082009
20102011
20120
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Exports Imports
10
Figure 2: Sri Lanka’s share in exports from developing countries, 1990-2011
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50Non-oil exports
Manufacturing exports
Apparel exports
11
What are the possible reasons?• Real exchange rate appreciation (Figure 3)
- Mirrors the growing domestic macroeconomic imbalances
• Deterioration in the investment climate
- ‘Doing Business’ (World Bank) ranking has slightly improved, but this capture solely the perception of existing enterprises.
- Other indicators (eg Enabling Trade Index of World Trade Forum, Country Risk Guide Index) , which are widely used by investors in assessing country risk, have significantly deteriorated
- Export oriented FDI inflows have declined and a large number of export-oriented foreign projects are no longer in operation
12
Figure 3: Sri Lanka: Real exchange rate and its components, 2004Q1 – 2012Q4
2004
Q1
2004
Q3
2005
Q1
2005
Q3
2006
Q1
2006
Q3
2007
Q1
2007
Q3
2008
Q1
2008
Q3
2009
Q1
2009
Q3
2010
Q1
2010
Q3
2011
Q1
2011
Q3
2012
Q10
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Nominal effective exchnage rate (NEER)
Real effective exchnage rate (REER)
Relative price (RP=PW/PD)
Inde
x, 2
004
= 10
0
13
• Has Sri Lanka run out of surplus labour?
Unemployment rate has decline: from 15.2% to 4.0% in 2012.
But, this is a deceptive indicator of labour market tightening, for two reasons:
(a) Massive increase in public sector employment: from 900 thousand in 2005 to 1279 thousand (14% of the total labour force!) in 2012
(b) Rapid increase in overseas employment
Total number of contract workers leaving the country increased from 1078 thousand during 2003-07 to 1307 during 2008-2012.
The current stock of overseas migrant workers amounts to over 14% of the total working age population .
14
3. Identification of the export basket: lessons from the East Asian experience
Sri Lankan has performed relatively poorly in most (if not all major product categories; so first we need to think about how to regain growth dynamism of existing products (Table 1).
As regards expanding the export basket, the East Asia experience suggests two vital addition:
(a) Fitting into ‘global production sharing’ within vertically integrated global industries (mostly in machinery and transport equipment)
(b) Processed food
15
Table 1: Sri Lanka’s export composition (%)
Product SITC code 1990-91 2000-01 2010-11
PRIMARY PRODUCTS 1-5 + 68 39.5 22.5 31.0Food and live animal 0 30.6 19.3 25.3Beverages and tobacco 1 0.5 0.8 0.8Crude material except fuel 2 6.7 1.9 4.5
Mineral fuel, lubricants etc. 3 1.4 0.5 0.3
Animal and vegetable oils, facts and waxes 4 0.2 0.1 0.1MANUFACTURING 5-8 57.0 76.2 68.3
Chemicals and related products 5 1.0 0.6 1.3
Manufacturing classified by material 6-68 1.7 4.9 2.0Machinery and transport equipment 7 3.0 5.7 5.3
Miscellaneous manufactured articles 8 39.4 57.6 46.6
Apparel 84 36.5 51.9 42.1
Unclassified product 9 3.5 1.3 0.7
100 100 100
US$ million 1950 5031 9158
Source: Compiled from UN Comtrade database
16
Global production sharing
Tables 2 and Figure 3
Machinery and transport equipment (SITC 7) figure prominently in world exports, and exports from East Asian countries.
The expansion of machinery and transport exports has been driven by ‘global production sharing’
17
Table 2: Sri Lanka’s export composition in global context, 2010-11 (%)
Primary products
Manufacturing
Total
Chemical and related
products
Products classified by
material
Machinery and transport
equipment ApparelMisc. products (excl. apparel)Total
Sri Lanka 31.0 68.3 1.3 2.0 5.3 42.1 4.5
India 17.6
78.0
12.8 32.3 17.2
6.0 9.6 100
China 3.8
96.1
5.9 16.6 49.2
8.3 16.1 100
Korea, Rep. of 2.7
96.7
11.7 14.7 60.3
0.4 9.7 100
Taiwan, China 3.1 101.7
9.9 18.6 59.5
4.3 3.4
100
Indonesia 51.0
47.8
6.8 16.3 14.2
5.1 5.4 100
Malaysia 19.6
79.6
7.8 11.0 49.5
2.4 8.9 100
Philippines 12.6
76.1
3.5 8.1 57.5
3.3 3.7 100
Singapore 3.3
86.7
14.6 4.7 58.9
0.4 8.1 100
Thailand 21.2
75.7
9.9 13.1 41.9
2.2 8.6 100
Vietnam 28.0
71.3
3.1 12.5 19.8
15.3 20.6 100
Developing countries 11.9
86.3
7.7 15.4 46.6
5.1 11.0
100
World 14.3
80.3
12.9 15.3 39.5
2.8 9.8 100
Global production sharing:‘The break-up of the production process into geographically separated stages’
It opens up opportunities for countries to specialise in different slices (tasks) of the production process in line with their relative cost advantage.
Alternative terms: International production fragmentation; vertical specialization, Slicing the value chain , Offshoring (international outsourcing
18
Example: Apple iPhone
The entire world iPhone exports is recorded as exports from China
and
iPhone imports to any country show up its trade data as imports from China
but
in reality, iPhone is ‘assembled’ in China: it is a global, rather than a Chinese, product
19
China’s direct value added 3.6%
The bulk of parts and components come from:
Japan 35.1%
Korea 13.3%
Germany 17.5%
USA 6.3%
Other countries 24.2%
20
21
Three phases in the global spread of production networks
(1) two-way exchange between home and host country: parts and component assembly/testing in the host country to be incorporated in final assembly in the home country
(2) component assembly networks encompassing many host countries (R&D, final assembly and head-quarter functions still in the home country)
(3) Full-fledged production networks involving component production/assembly/tenting and final assembly encompassing host countries ( R&D and head-quarter functions are still predominantly in the home country
Product Coverage
First in electronics and
then, spread into many other industries:consumer electronics electrical goods machine tool automobile cameras and watches pharmaceuticals, bio-medical equipment sola panels light emitting diodes
22
23
Products within the category of machinery and transport
equipment are generally capital and technology intensive
(‘high-tech’ products)
But, under global production sharing, a given country specialises in a slice (task) of the production value chain that suits its relative cost advantages.
In a labour abundant economy, assembly activities within global production networks tend to be relatively more labour intensive (and hence ‘pro poor’) compared to conventional manufacturing (that is, production of a good from start to finish in just one country).
The statisticians (economist!) who compile the export sophistication data used in World Bank and IMF reports have missed this important point (This error comes from the Harvard's Kennedy School)
24
• Global production sharing has been the prime mover of the ‘great transformation in world trade’ (mentioned before) (Figure 3)
• ‘Network products’ (parts and components, and final assembly figure prominently in the export strictures of East Asian countries (Table 3).
25
Figure 3: Developing countries’ share in world manufacturing exports
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
40.0
45.0
50.0
Total manufacturing
Netwrok products
26
Table 3: Share of network products in manufacturing exports, 2009-10 (%)
Parts & components Final assembly Total Sri Lanka 3.5 0 3.5
Developing East Asia 38.5 24.7 63.2China 20.5 36.8 57.3
Taiwan 44.7 20.9 65.6
Republic of Korea 43.2 25.5 68.7
ASEAN 59.2 10.1 69.2
Indonesia 19.5 18 37.5
Malaysia 65.5 13.2 78.7
The Philippines 71.2 16.3 87.5 Singapore 49.5 18 67.5 Thailand 44.5 21.4 65.9
Viet Nam 12.03 7.5 19.5
South Asia 8.1 4.2 12.3
India 10.4 3.7 14.1
Developed countries 25.2 23.6 48.8
Developing countries 35.2 18.4 53.6
World 28.2 23 51.2
27
Global production sharing and export-led industrialization
Global production sharing opens up new opportunities for countries participation in a finer international division of labour, to specialize in different slices (tasks) of the production process.
It defeats the fallacy of composition argument against export-led industrialisation.
But, a country’s success in joining global production networks and industrial advancement does not depend on the availability of labour at relatively low wages alone. (As already discussed, only a handful of developing countries have gained significantly from global production sharing)
To complement labour cost advantage, countries need to focus on:
• Availability of middle-level (supervisory) technical manpower
• Lowering the cost of ‘service links’
Service link cost: cost involved in coordinating production blocks located in various countries
28
Lowering the cost of ‘service links’
Service link cost in a given country depends on a whole
range of factors impacting on the overall investment environment:
(i) Infrastructure and trade-related logistic
In addition to improved land connectivity, facilities for speedy air transportation is vital for electronics and other ‘high value-to-weight’ products)
(ii) political stability and policy certainty
29
(iii) Property right protection, including enforcement of contracts (particularly important for entry into producer-drive production networks)
(iv) Concurrent liberalisation of trade and investment policy regimes
MNEs are the key players in global production sharing (discussed)
-- the bulk of global production sharing takes place through intra-firm linkages rather than in an arms-length manner.
FDI and trade polices are co-determinants of the location choice of MNEs within production networks.
30
Penang Case Study
Penang (Malaysia), a classic example of achieving export success trough ‘plugging into’ global production networks
Athukorala, P. (2011), Growing by Global Production Sharing: The Tale of Penang Export Hub, Geneva: International Trade Centre/World Trade Organization.
http://crawford.anu.edu.au/acde/publications/publish/papers/
wp2011/wp_econ_2011_13.pdf]
31
Evolution of the export hub
• 1971-1975
The arrival of ‘Eight Samurai’ (National Semiconductor (NS), Intel, AMD, Osrum, Hewlett Packard, Bosch, Hitachi, Clarion) to set up plants for component assembly
• Emergence of ancillary (supporting) industries
- initially foreign vendors (mostly from Taiwan and Singapore)
- Then, local vendors (Box 4: Eng Teknologi, Box 5: LKT Industries (Athukorala 2011)
By the mid-1980s, an export cluster with a sizeable number of branch plants of electronics and electrical MNEs and a network of supporting firms was well established (‘silicon Island’)
• From the late 1980s: Production base
diversified with the entry of MNEs in consumer
electronics and consumer peripheral industries
• From about the mid-1990s: Further diversification of product composition and structural changes in the last decade or so
- some contraction of final assembly of consumer electronics and electrical goods in face of competitive pressure from China
- relocation in other low-cost countries of relatively more labour intensive segments in hard disk drive, and electronics parts and components production/assembly industries
• a number of large electronics MNEs has shifted regional head-quarter functions and some R&D activities to Penang.
• MNEs in a number of new electronics–related dynamic product lines have set up production/assembly plants in Penang:
medical services and equipment
light emitting diodes (LED)
photovoltaic design and development
Outcomes
Penang now accounts for nearly 40% of total manufactured goods exported from Malaysia
Export growth in recent years have largely been driven by price increases rather than volume expansion
(Figure 4)
Figure 4: Manufactured Exports from Penang: Vale (US$ million) (left scale) and share in Malaysian exports
36
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 20090
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Exports,US$ bns (left scale) Share (%) (right scale)
• Faster economic growth in Penang compared to the other states :– Penang per capital income compared to the national average:
10% lower in the early 1970s– 57% higher in 2010
Unemployment rate and Poverty rate have been much lower than the national average over the past three decades
What explains Penang success?
• Focused investment promotion • Effective personal involvement from the top level of
government• Post-investment care (FDI promotion did not end at the
point of binging the investor into the country)• Infrastructure development (an innovative ‘land bank)• Vocational training and skill development (Penang Skill
Development centre)• Fostering MNE-local firm links
38
39
Processed Food
Importance of processed food as a dynamic export product line for developing countries
Share of Processed Food in Total Food Exports
1990-81 2000/01 2010-01
Developed countries 42.5 63.5 70.3
Developing countries 40.5 55.7 62.5
Low-income countries 27.2 33.5 43.5
Middle-income countries 38.5 54.0 59.0
High-income countries 54.8 59.9 64.1
World 49.1 60.9 65.1
40
• Powerful forces on both demand and supply sides have underpinned this development ( it is a structural change):
- ‘internationalisation’ of food habits
- advances in food technology, transport and refrigeration facilities
41
Share of processed food (2010-11)
In Total food Total non-oil exports merchandise
export
Thailand 75% 23%
Vietnam 45% 27%
Sri Lanka 17% 5%
42
The new export opportunities are important for growth and poverty implications of agricultural trade in agricultural resource-rich and labour abundant developing countries
Why?
(1) Terms of trade gains (high price and income elasticity of demand)
(2) Employment generation (greater labour intensity of production compared to other resource-based manufacturing)
(3) Balance of payments impact, or net addition to national income (GNP) (high domestic input content)
(4) Spread effects on the rural economy
43
• Export success depends crucially on the ability to meet sanitary and phyto-sanitary standards (SPS) standards.
• Foreign direct investment is vital for forging market links and in meeting SPS standards
Top Related