Introduction
Standard Environmental Sampling ProcessSoftware ObjectivesEnviroMap DemoEnviroMap vs. Alternative SolutionsQuestions
Standard Environmental Sampling Process
Schedule created by user
choosing sites from
a list
List of sites to be
sampled are printed
out and given to a sampler
Sites are sampled, collection
times recorded,
and samples are sent to
lab
Results are returned
from the lab, and handled according to predefined procedures
Historical results are maintained
and analyzed routinely, to determine the risk of
sites
Drawbacks
Scheduling
•Sites are not truly selected at random•Risk level priorities are left up to the user creating the schedule
Sampling•Changes are difficult on-the-fly, leading to an incomplete audit trail•Procedures are handled and enforced manually
Time Consuming•Scheduling•Sampling•Enforcing Procedures•Maintaining Results•Analyzing Results
Allows multiple schedules to run concurrently; reduces contamination risk by not scheduling the same site more than once a day
Automatic Scheduling Summary
Sites are chosen at random, with high risk sites selected more frequently
Allows multiple schedules to run concurrently, and reduces contamination risk by not scheduling the same site more than once a day
Supports requesting multiple tests for each sampled site via test groups
Schedule length, sample frequency, sampling times, and collection sizes can all be customized
Sampling SummaryQuick Calendar View of Scheduled
CollectionsMobile Integration eliminates need for
computer at sampling siteBarcode Integration supports barcodes
and ID #’s from external systemsRapid collection-time entry, with on-the-fly
change capabilities
LIMS Integration Summary
Automatic submission & results retrieval from external LIMS systems
Integration via web services, ftp, or email in the following formats: xml, csv, or xls
Ability to choose a different LIMS system for each user defined test type
Supports & displays external LIMS reference numbers
Positive Result Procedures Summary
Procedures are automatically started when a positive result is received
Separate procedures can be defined based on positive iteration (1st positive vs. 2nd positive)
Procedures run for user defined length of time, number of negatives, or until all sites have been sampled
For numeric results, user defines “positive” based on result limits
Notifications & Alerts Summary
Notifications via email/textPositive result alertsSite change notificationsRecent alerts/notifications displayed for
user at login
Site Audit Trail Summary
Complete audit trail for every site in the system
Tracks all changes related to risk levels, name changes, scheduling, sampling, and results
Filter by event type, user or date range
Uses historical data and Optimized Trending Analysis Engine (O.T.A.E.) to determine which sites should be sampled more/less frequently
Allows for a user to override and cancel these suggestions before the integrated scheduler utilizes them
Historical Data Analysis Summary
Uses historical data and Optimized Trending Analysis Engine (O.T.A.E.) to determine which sites should be sampled more/less frequently
Allows for a user to override and cancel these suggestions before the integrated scheduler utilizes them
Quick Search to view recent results Dynamic charting capabilities
EnviroMap vs. Alternative Solutions
EnviroMap Paper System
Other Software
Scheduling Automatic Manual Manual
# of Schedules Multiple Multiple Single
# of Test Types Multiple Multiple Single
Submitting Samples to LIMS Integrated Manual Integrated
Enforcing Procedures Automatic Manual Automatic
Notifications/Alerts Automatic Manual Automatic
Site Audit Trail Automatic Manual Manual
Dynamic Charting Included Manual Manual
Optimized Trending Analysis Engine (O.T.A.E)
Included N/A N/A
EnviroMapManagement Solutions of Virginia
Larry Bowman540-961-7122
http://www.managementsolutionsofva.com/enviromap
Top Related