Whole Child ● Whole School ● Whole Community 1
Emergent Bilingual Data and Report in IL
Dr. Seon H. Eun, Data Strategies and AnalyticsDr. Shuwan Chiu, Research and Evaluation
Illinois State Board of Education
Multilingual Illinois 2019 ConferenceDecember 5, 2019
Hilton/Oak Brook Hills Conference CenterOak Brook, IL
Whole Child ● Whole School ● Whole Community 2
Agenda
❑Emergent Bilingual (EB) Data Collection
❑Bilingual Ed. Program Delivery Report
❑Emergent Bilingual Data Reports
❑Demographic, Program, Placement, Funding, Performance data
❑Questions
Whole Child ● Whole School ● Whole Community 3
A Brief about Bilingual Ed. Program Delivery Report (PDR)
❑ Annual Data collection for Bilingual Education Program Implementation in IL Districts.
❑ District level data collection❑ Districts that received state and/or federal funds for EL program
services have been required to submit the report. ❑ Approximately 300 or more districts have been identified and
required to PDR submission every year.❑ Located in IWAS under Annual Reporting❑ Collection Timeline: May-July❑ The Bilingual Ed. PDR collections have been modified to reflect
changes in federal and state rules and regs and to streamline data collection.
❑ Generates data for federal and state reports.
Whole Child ● Whole School ● Whole Community 4
Bilingual Ed. PDR: How to Login to IWAS- Go to ISBE.NET
• Access the PDR through ISBE’s Web Application Security System (IWAS)
• Link to IWAS from ISBE’s Homepage: https://www.isbe.net/
Whole Child ● Whole School ● Whole Community 5
How to Login to IWAS- Enter Login Info.
• Enter Login information or select the Sign Up Now link
Whole Child ● Whole School ● Whole Community 6
How to Login to IWAS-System Listing
Whole Child ● Whole School ● Whole Community 7
How to login to IWAS- Bilingual ED. PDR
Whole Child ● Whole School ● Whole Community 8
PDR Communication via IWAS
Whole Child ● Whole School ● Whole Community 9
PDR Submission Follow up
Whole Child ● Whole School ● Whole Community 10
Bilingual Ed. PDR Submission Rate
2019 Bilingual Ed. PDR Cohort Districts (*updated) SD # SD %
EBF ($5,000 or higher) only 76 SDs 25%
EBF ($5,000 or higher) and Title III LIPLEPs 223 SDs 72%
Title III LIPLEPs only 9 SDs 3%
Total 308 SDs 100%
Bilingual Ed. PDR Submission Rate
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 (*updated)
PDR cohort 304 SDs 310 SDs 307 SDs 310 SDs 308 SDs
Submitted 304 SDs 310 SDs 303 SDs 310 SDs 308 SDs
Not Submitted 0 0 4 SDs 0 0
Submission Rate 100% 100% 99% 100% 100%
Illinois Districts that received State TBE/TPI and/or Title III LIPLEPs were required for The PDR submission. Due to changes in state funding formula, there is no TBE/TPI funds. Districts that received EBF ($5,000) and/or Title III LIPLEPs have been required for 2019 PDR Submission.
Whole Child ● Whole School ● Whole Community 11
2019 Bilingual Ed. PDR in IWAS
Whole Child ● Whole School ● Whole Community 12
2019 Bilingual Ed. PDR StructureIL Districts that received $5,000 or more of state Evidence-Based Funding (EBF) and/or federal Title III LIPLEPs funds in FY2019 MUST submit this report.
A. Type of Program Funding (Select only one)
State EBF for EL services only ($5,000 or more) State EBF for EL services ($5,000 or more) and Federal Title III LIPLEPs Federal Title III LIPLEPs only
B. Program areas
• Question 1: EL Teachers in the current year
• Question 2: EL Teachers in the future years
• Question 3: EL Topics of Staff Development
• Question 4: Participants of Staff Development
• Question 5: Resources for EL parents/families
• Question 6: Extended program services to ELs
Whole Child ● Whole School ● Whole Community 13
Other Bilingual Data Collections• Student Information System (SIS): student level data Language, Race,
Country,
EL Placement,
EL Services provided,
EL Program models,
Dual Language,
EL Screener,
ACCESS Scores,
Immigrant Education
Program,
Seal of Bilieracy,
etc…
Whole Child ● Whole School ● Whole Community 14
Emergent Bilingual Data Reports
• Consolidated State Performance Report (CSPR): – Annual data report for IL performance submitted to ED. – Reporting multiple programs, service delivery and performance that
received federal Title funding. EB data section is a part of it.
• State Statistical Data Reports:– Annual data reports: Annual Report, Annual Statistical Report,
Bilingual Statistical Report, etc…
• Reports include EL enrollment, funding, program, demographics, student performance…
https://www.isbe.net/Pages/Data-Analysis-Reports.aspx
This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed
Whole Child ● Whole School ● Whole Community 15
2018 Emergent Bilinguals by Language
Language # %
1 Spanish 176,271 71.41%
2 Arabic 9,298 3.77%
3 Polish 6,910 2.8%
4 Urdu 3,855 1.56%
5 Pilipino (Tagalog) 2,295 0.93%
6 Gujarati 2,242 0.91%
7 Russian 1,942 0.79%
8 Mandarin (Chinese) 1,920 0.78%
9 French 1,656 0.67%
10 Telugu (Telegu) 1,611 0.65%
11 Others 38,848 15.74%
Total 246,848 100%
Whole Child ● Whole School ● Whole Community 16
Emergent Bilinguals Trend by Language
Top 10 Languages Spoken in IL
Native Language 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Spanish 166,594 165,152 174,401 173,482 174,971 176,271
Arabic 5,832 6,436 7,306 7,867 8,735 9,298
Polish 5,849 6,025 6,762 6,866 6,709 6,910
Urdu 2,824 2,820 3,307 3,584 3,788 3,855
Pilipino (Tagalog) 1,822 1,770 1,964 2,081 2,130 2,295
Gujarati 1,688 1,645 1,857 2,000 2,039 2,242
Russian 1,273 1,278 1,452 1,549 1,695 1,942
Mandarin (Chinese) 1,303 1,434 1,705 1,752 1,841 1,920Vietnamese 1,325 1,288 1,399 1,410 1,448 1,484
Cantonese (Chinese) 1,314 1,384 1,429 1,381 1,383 1,253
Whole Child ● Whole School ● Whole Community 17
2018 Emergent Bilinguals By Location
30.44%
25.23%10.88%
8.40%
8.35%
4.04%
2.14%1.82%
1.04%1.02%
6.64%
2018 Emergent Bilinguals by Location
City of Chicago SD 299 Cook Kane Lake
Dupage Will Winnebago McHenry
Champaign Rock Island Other Counties
Whole Child ● Whole School ● Whole Community 18
2018 Emergent Bilinguals by Race
Race/ Ethnicity
American Indian or
Alaska NativeAsian
Black or African
American
Hispanic or Latino
Two or More Races
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Island
White Total
# 1,238 24,831 6,554 183,734 2,204 317 27,970 246,848
% 0.5% 10.1% 2.7% 74.4% 0.9% 0.1% 11.3% 100.0%
0.50% 10.10%2.70%
74.40%
0.90%
0.10%11.30%
2018 Emergent Bilinguals by Race
American Indian or Alaska Native Asian
Black or African American Hispanic or Latino
Two or More Races Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Island
White
Whole Child ● Whole School ● Whole Community 19
2018 Emergent Bilinguals by GradeGrade # %
PreK 22,769 9.22%
K 26,768 10.84%
1 28,143 11.40%
2 28,193 11.42%
3 29,769 12.06%
4 29,332 11.88%
5 17,391 7.05%
6 11,683 4.73%
7 10,526 4.26%
8 9,352 3.79%
9 10,224 4.14%
10 9,481 3.84%
11 7,563 3.06%
12 5,654 2.29%
Total 246,848 100.00%
PreK K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Series1 9.22% 10.84 11.40 11.42 12.06 11.88 7.05% 4.73% 4.26% 3.79% 4.14% 3.84% 3.06% 2.29%
0.00%
2.00%
4.00%
6.00%
8.00%
10.00%
12.00%
14.00%
Enro
llmen
t %
Grade
2018 Emergent Bilinguals by Grade
Whole Child ● Whole School ● Whole Community 20
Emergent Bilinguals by Disability (2018)
Grade No Disability Disability Total
# % # # # %
PreK 16,197 6.56% 6,572 2.66% 22,769 9.22%
KG 22,778 9.23% 3,990 1.62% 26,768 10.84%
1 24,018 9.73% 4,125 1.67% 28,143 11.40%
2 23,785 9.64% 4,408 1.79% 28,193 11.42%
3 25,128 10.18% 4,641 1.88% 29,769 12.06%
4 24,596 9.96% 4,736 1.92% 29,332 11.88%
5 13,019 5.27% 4,372 1.77% 17,391 7.05%
6 7,868 3.19% 3,815 1.55% 11,683 4.73%
7 6,961 2.82% 3,565 1.44% 10,526 4.26%
8 6,125 2.48% 3,227 1.31% 9,352 3.79%
9 7,103 2.88% 3,121 1.26% 10,224 4.14%
10 6,877 2.79% 2,604 1.05% 9,481 3.84%
11 5,201 2.11% 2,362 0.96% 7,563 3.06%
12 3,469 1.41% 2,185 0.89% 5,654 2.29%
Total 193,125 78.24% 53,723 21.76% 246,848 100.00%
Whole Child ● Whole School ● Whole Community 21
EB Trend_ Top EB Districts
School District Name 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
City of Chicago SD 299 69,705 70,962 73,976 72,520 72,243 75,136
SD U-46 10,532 10,602 11,330 11,995 12,162 12,929
Cicero SD 99 7,408 6,973 7,043 6,836 6,466 6,717
Aurora East USD 131 5,655 5,339 5,376 5,233 5,553 5,881
Waukegan CUSD 60 5,303 5,167 5,615 5,557 5,585 5,849
Rockford SD 205 3,673 3,633 3,927 4,101 4,388 4,835
CUSD 300 2,671 2,498 3,125 3,224 3,277 3,654
Schaumburg CCSD 54 3,039 3,087 3,444 3,595 3,593 3,440
Palatine CCSD 15 2,795 2,817 2,982 3,116 3,228 3,405
Wheeling CCSD 21 2,629 2,525 2,772 2,794 2,786 2,944Other Large EB districts include Aurora West USD 219, Indiana Prairie CUSD 204, Comm Cons SD 59, etc..
Whole Child ● Whole School ● Whole Community 22
2018 EB Placement_StatewideDistrict * Student**
# % # %
TBE Full time 266 16.53% 116,183 47.07%
TBE Part time 293 18.21% 58,163 23.56%
TPI 464 28.84% 54,598 22.12%
Other/Alternative*** 270 16.78% 1,594 0.65%
Parent Refused 307 19.08% 16,271 6.59%
No EL Placement 9 0.56% 39 0.02%
Total 1609 100.00% 246,848 100.00%
* Duplicated District EL Placement** Unduplicated student placement count*** Other/Alternative Placement: data concern
Data source: 2018 SIS
Whole Child ● Whole School ● Whole Community 23
2018 EL Program Models_Statewide
4.7%
8.1%
19.7%
24.9%6.0%
22.2%
14.3%
0.02%
2018 EB Program Models
Dual language-Two Way (01) Dual language-One way (02)
Transitional Bilingual Program - Self Contained (03) Transitional Bilingual Program - Collaboration (04)
Transitional Program in English - Self-Contained (05) Transitional Program in English - Collaboration (06)
None of the Above (00) Missing Program Type
Whole Child ● Whole School ● Whole Community 24
2018 District FundingNumber and Percentage of School Districts, by Type of Program Funding and EL
Enrollments
Type of EL Program funding Districts EL Enrollments
NumberPCT of Total Number PCT of Total
State -EBF funding 490 76.6% 245,790 99.6%
State -EBF funding only 255 39.8% 10,002 4.1%
State -EBF funding and Federal Title III LIPLEP funding 235 36.7% 235,788 95.5%
No State EBF funding 150 23.4% 1,058 0.4%
Total 640 100.0% 246,848 100.0%
*2018 State EBF (Evidence Based Funding) includes Base, Supplemental and Tier funding for ELS.* Out of a total of 866 SDs, 640 SDs report ELs in their district* Total SD 866 SDs (Including Elementary, High school, and Unit Districts plus State Charters)* Data source: 2018 Bilingual Education Program Delivery Report, SIS
Whole Child ● Whole School ● Whole Community 25
2019 Seal of Biliteracy Awards
Commendation Seal Total
# % # % # %
Non-ELs 2,725 94.7% 6,108 98.25% 8,833 97.14%
ELs 151 5.25% 109 1.75% 260 2.86%
Total 2,876 100% 6,217 100% 9,093 100%
Student received Commendation
Student received Seal
Total
# % # % # %
2,876 31.63% 6,217 68.37% 9,093 100%
Seal of Biliteracy Award Total
Seal of Biliteracy Award By EL Status
Whole Child ● Whole School ● Whole Community 26
2019 Seal of Biliteracy by languageLanguage Commendation Seal Total
# % # % # %
Arabic 10 0.3% 24 0.4% 34 0.4%
Bulgarian 0 0.0% 5 0.1% 5 0.1%
Cantonese (Chinese) 0 0.0% 5 0.1% 5 0.1%
English 2 0.1% 0 0.0% 2 0.0%
French 418 14.5% 437 7.0% 855 9.4%
German 160 5.6% 92 1.5% 252 2.8%
Greek 0 0.0% 1 0.0% 1 0.0%
Hebrew 9 0.3% 15 0.2% 24 0.3%
Hindi 2 0.1% 10 0.2% 12 0.1%
Italian 23 0.8% 31 0.5% 54 0.6%
Japanese 13 0.5% 35 0.6% 48 0.5%
Karen (S'gaw) 0 0.0% 1 0.0% 1 0.0%
Korean 5 0.2% 23 0.4% 28 0.3%
Latin 59 2.1% 55 0.9% 114 1.3%
Latvian 0 0.0% 2 0.0% 2 0.0%
Lithuanian 0 0.0% 3 0.0% 3 0.0%
Maay or Mai Mai 0 0.0% 1 0.0% 1 0.0%
Mandarin (Chinese) 37 1.3% 149 2.4% 186 2.0%
Other 9 0.3% 1 0.0% 10 0.1%
Pilipino (Tagalog) 0 0.0% 2 0.0% 2 0.0%
Polish 77 2.7% 135 2.2% 212 2.3%
Portuguese 4 0.1% 3 0.0% 7 0.1%
Russian 13 0.5% 37 0.6% 50 0.5%
Spanish 2033 70.7% 5144 82.7% 7177 78.9%
Swahili 0 0.0% 2 0.0% 2 0.0%
Thai 2 0.1% 1 0.0% 3 0.0%
Urdu 0 0.0% 1 0.0% 1 0.0%
Vietnamese 0 0.0% 2 0.0% 2 0.0%
Total 2876 100.0% 6217 100.0% 9093 100.0%
Whole Child ● Whole School ● Whole Community 27
2019 Seal of Biliteracy by SchoolSchool Name Commendation Seal Total
J Sterling Morton East High School 101 298 399Barrington High School 182 137 319Glenbrook South High School 56 153 209Adlai E Stevenson High School 47 162 209York Comm High School 105 88 193
Bolingbrook High School 101 73 174
New Trier Township High School 0 154 154Lane Technical High School 0 149 149Lincoln-Way East High School 85 62 147Hinsdale Central High School 43 101 144
Lake Forest High School 67 69 136West Aurora High School 57 68 125Evanston Twp High School 47 76 123
South Elgin High School 90 31 121Young Magnet High School 0 120 120
Warren Township High School 49 71 120Glenbrook North High School 42 71 113Lake Park High School 64 49 113
Larkin High School 66 37 103J Sterling Morton West High School 31 71 102
Other IL High Schools 1,643 4,177 5,820Total 2,876 6,217 9,093
Whole Child ● Whole School ● Whole Community 28
2018 EB Teacher Licensure
Type of Certificate All EL Teachers
Number of EL Teachers currently working in Title III
Language Instruction Educational Programs
NumberPCT of Total Number
PCT of All Teachers
Certificate with ESL Endorsements and/or Approval 4231 25.1% 4225 25.1%
Certificate with Bilingual Endorsements and/or Approval 2774 16.5% 2774 16.5%
Both ESL and Bilingual Endorsements 8193 48.6% 8193 48.7%
Type 29 (Transitional Bilingual Certificate) 32 0.2% 32 0.2%
English as a New Language (ENL) (Secondary only) 10 0.1% 10 0.1%
English as a New Language -Bilingual (Secondary only) 1445 8.6% 1444 8.6%
Visiting International Teaching Certificate 86 0.5% 86 0.5%
Other Certifications* 73 0.4% 73 0.4%
TOTAL: 16844 100.0% 16837 100.0%
Whole Child ● Whole School ● Whole Community 29
2018 Professional Development on EL topics
180
132 127
107
56
185
152 147157
113 109
82
151
24
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
Dis
tric
t #
PD Topics
2018 PD Topics_Title III LIPLEP funded Districts
Whole Child ● Whole School ● Whole Community 30
2018 PD Participants
60%19%
4%
4%
7%
1%1%
3%
2018 PD Participants
General Education teachers
EL classroom teachers
Principals
Administrators other than principals
Non-teaching staff/paraprofessionals
Non-administrative school personnel
Community Based OrganizationPersonnel
Other
Whole Child ● Whole School ● Whole Community 31
ACCESS by PL
* K-12th only *Others includes ELs with Alt. ACCESS, Not tested, missing ACCESS scores.
12.61%
17.87%
38.14%
25.49%
5.42%
0.48%
8.12%
2018 ACCESS for ELLs by PL
Level 1- Emerging
Level 2-Beginning
Level 3-Developing
Level 4-Expanding
Level 5-Bridging
Level 6- Reaching
Others*
Whole Child ● Whole School ● Whole Community 32
EB Exit (4.8 on ACCESS) by Grade
KG 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Total
Exit 2.90% 3.48% 5.87% 8.77% 25.78% 15.28% 1.71% 2.76% 3.19% 6.49% 6.60% 4.36% 2.81% 8.40%
No Exit 97.10% 96.52% 94.13% 91.23% 74.22% 84.72% 98.29% 97.24% 96.81% 93.51% 93.40% 95.64% 97.19% 91.61%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Grade
2018 EB Exit on ACCESS
No Exit Exit
Whole Child ● Whole School ● Whole Community 33
EB Trend Data_ Exit RateSchool Year 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Exit cut on ACCESS 4.8/4.2 4.8/4.2 5.0/4.2/4.2 5.0/4.2/4.2 5.0/4.2/4.2 4.8 4.8
Exit Rate 18.7% 22.2% 12.7% 16.6% 16.3% 5.7% 8.4%
Year ELP cut score on ACCESS for ELLs
…2008 4.0 OCPL (Overall Composite PL) +local decision
2009 4.8 OCPL/4.2 LCPL (Literacy Composite PL)
2010 4.8 OCPL/4.2 LCPL
2011 4.8 OCPL/4.2 LCPL
2012 4.8 OCPL/4.2 LCPL
2013 4.8 OCPL/4.2 LCPL
2014 5.0 OCPL/ 4.2 Reading and 4.2 Writing
2015 5.0 OCPL/4.2 Reading and 4.2 Writing
2016 5.0 OCPL/4.2 Reading and 4.2 Writing
2017 4.8 OCPL
2018 4.8 OCPL
2019 4.8 OCPL
Whole Child ● Whole School ● Whole Community 34
EB on PARCC and SAT2018 EB vs. Non-EBs on PARCC and SAT_ Reading
2018 Reading (% Meet or Exceed)
ELs Non-ELs
Grade 3_PARCC 18.2 41.6
Grade 4_PARCC 17.7 43.4
Grade 5_PARCC 3.8 39.4
Grade 6_PARCC 1.9 36.5
Grade 7_PARCC 3 42.3
Grade 8_PARCC 2.3 38.4
Grade 3-8_PARCC 11.4 40.2
Grade 11_SAT 1.4 38.4
Grade3_PARCC
Grade4_PARCC
Grade5_PARCC
Grade6_PARCC
Grade7_PARCC
Grade8_PARCC
Grade 3-8_PARCC
Grade11_SAT
ELs 18.2 17.7 3.8 1.9 3 2.3 11.4 1.4
Non-ELs 41.6 43.4 39.4 36.5 42.3 38.4 40.2 38.4
18.2 17.7
3.8 1.9 3 2.3
11.4
1.4
41.6 43.439.4
36.5
42.338.4 40.2 38.4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
% M
eet
or
Exce
ed
2018 Reading (% Meet or Exceed): ELs vs. Non-ELs
ELs Non-ELs
Whole Child ● Whole School ● Whole Community 35
EB on PARCC and SAT2018 EBs vs. Non-EBs on PARCC and SAT_ Math
2018 Math (% Meet or Exceed)
ELsNon-ELs
Grade 3_PARCC 21.8 41.8
Grade 4_PARCC 13.4 35.8
Grade 5_PARCC 5.1 34
Grade 6_PARCC 3.1 28.8
Grade 7_PARCC 3.7 32.6
Grade 8_PARCC 4.1 32.2
Grade 3-8_PARCC
11.6 33.9
Grade 11_SAT 3.7 35.7
Grade3_PARCC
Grade4_PARCC
Grade5_PARCC
Grade6_PARCC
Grade7_PARCC
Grade8_PARCC
Grade 3-8_PARCC
Grade11_SAT
ELs 21.8 13.4 5.1 3.1 3.7 4.1 11.6 3.7
Non-ELs 41.8 35.8 34 28.8 32.6 32.2 33.9 35.7
21.8
13.4
5.1 3.1 3.7 4.1
11.6
3.7
41.8
35.8 3428.8
32.6 32.2 33.9 35.7
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
% M
eet
or
Exce
ed
2018 Math (% Meet or Exceed):ELs vs. Non-ELs
ELs Non-ELs
Whole Child ● Whole School ● Whole Community 36
Former EB on PARCC and SAT2018 Non EB vs. Former EBs on PARCC and SAT_ Reading
Grade3_PARCC
Grade4_PARCC
Grade5_PARCC
Grade6_PARCC
Grade7_PARCC
Grade8_PARCC
Grade 3-8_PARCC
Grade11_SAT
Non-ELs 41.6 43.4 39.4 36.5 42.3 38.4 40.2 38.4
Former ELs 78.86 75.68 41.33 31.19 38.37 32.37 49.63 22.91
41.6 43.439.4
36.542.3
38.4 40.2 38.4
78.8675.68
41.33
31.19
38.3732.37
49.63
22.91
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
% M
eet
or
Exce
ed
2018 Reading (% Meet or Exceed): Non-ELs vs. Former ELs
Non-ELs Former ELs
2018 Reading (% Meet or Exceed)
Non-ELs Former ELs
Grade 3_PARCC 41.6 78.86
Grade 4_PARCC 43.4 75.68
Grade 5_PARCC 39.4 41.33
Grade 6_PARCC 36.5 31.19
Grade 7_PARCC 42.3 38.37
Grade 8_PARCC 38.4 32.37
Grade 3-8_PARCC 40.2 49.63
Grade 11_SAT 38.4 22.91
Whole Child ● Whole School ● Whole Community 37
Former EB on PARCC and SAT2018 Non-EB vs. Former EBs on PARCC and SAT_ Math
2018 Math (% Meet or Exceed)
Non-ELsFormer ELs
Grade 3_PARCC 41.8 80.02
Grade 4_PARCC 35.8 65.64
Grade 5_PARCC 34 38.36
Grade 6_PARCC 28.8 26.31
Grade 7_PARCC 32.6 28.82
Grade 8_PARCC 32.2 27.86Grade 3-8_PARCC 33.9 44.50
Grade 11_SAT 35.7 25.38
Grade3_PARCC
Grade4_PARCC
Grade5_PARCC
Grade6_PARCC
Grade7_PARCC
Grade8_PARCC
Grade 3-8_PARCC
Grade11_SAT
Non-ELs 41.8 35.8 34 28.8 32.6 32.2 33.9 35.7
Former ELs 80.02 65.64 38.36 26.31 28.82 27.86 44.50 25.38
41.835.8 34
28.832.6 32.2 33.9 35.7
80.02
65.64
38.36
26.31 28.82 27.86
44.50
25.38
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
% M
eet
or
Exce
ed
2018 Math (% Meet or Exceed): Non-ELs vs. Former ELs
Non-ELs Former ELs
Whole Child ● Whole School ● Whole Community 38
Former ELs by Year on Academic Assessment
1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year
NotProficient 36% 71% 69% 65%
Proficient 64% 29% 31% 35%
36%
71% 69%65%64%
29% 31%35%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
% O
F M
EET
OR
EX
CEE
D
YEAR AFTER EXIT
2018 Former ELs_Reading
NotProficient Proficient
Whole Child ● Whole School ● Whole Community 39
Former ELs by Year on Academic Assessment
1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year
NotProficient 42% 73% 74% 73%
Proficient 58% 27% 26% 27%
42%
73% 74% 73%
58%
27% 26% 27%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
% O
F M
EET
OR
EX
CEE
D
YEAR AFTER EXIT
2018 Former ELs_Math
NotProficient Proficient
Whole Child ● Whole School ● Whole Community 40
Questions
THANK YOU!
Top Related