Download - DOEACC Centre, Kolkata. Centers at which training is being conducted/to be conducted Anantpur Bangalore Chennai Gandhinagar Gangtok/Guwahati Kolkata Lucknow.

• DOEACC Centre, Kolkata

Centers at which training is being conducted/to be conducted

• Anantpur• Bangalore• Chennai• Gandhinagar• Gangtok/Guwahati

• Kolkata• Lucknow• Patna• Guntur• Hyderabad

Centre-wise Status of Training (As on February 28, 2003)

Training Centre Course Number of Batches Number of Participants

Gandhinagar OPT 5 70

DCA 3 51

DSS 2 16

Chennai OPT 9 176

DCA 6 55

DSS 4 18

Hyderabad OPT 5 140

DCA 5 110

DSS 2 36

GIS 1 14

Kolkata OPT 9 204

DCA 6 84

DSS 4 32

Patna OPT 2 34

DCA 1 33

Guntur OPT 1 15

DCA 1 14

DSS 1 1

Lucknow OPT 3 91

Gangtok OPT 3 22

Total 1216

State wise break up of training (As on February 28, 2003)

State Projected Attended

OPT DCA DSS Total OPT DCA DSS GIS Total

Andaman & Nicobar 9 1 1 11 1 1 0 0 2

Andhra Pradesh 284 161 70 515 140 124 37 14 315

Assam 42 13 10 65 20 1 0 0 21

Bihar 62 27 18 107 34 33 0 0 67

Chattisgarh 19 2 1 22 15 0 0 0 15

Goa 9 4 4 17 4 1 0 0 5

Gujarat 116 30 19 165 70 51 16 0 137

Jharkhand 29 10 2 41 19 5 0 0 24

Karnataka 122 45 23 190 72 6 2 0 80

Meghalaya 7 4 2 13 0 0 0 0 0

Orissa 36 14 6 56 21 4 1 0 26

Sikkim 7 2 2 11 8 0 0 0 8

Tamil Nadu 185 61 42 288 100 48 16 0 164

Uttar Pradesh 121 32 21 174 91 0 0 0 91

West Bengal 237 82 41 360 157 73 31 0 261

Total128

5 488 262 2035 752 347 103 14 1216

State Projected

OPT DCA DSS Total

Andaman & Nicobar 9 1 1 11

Andhra Pradesh 284 161 70 515

Assam 42 13 10 65

Bihar 62 27 18 107

Chattisgarh 19 2 1 22

Goa 9 4 4 17

Gujarat 116 30 19 165

Jharkhand 29 10 2 41

Karnataka 122 45 23 190

Meghalaya 7 4 2 13

Orissa 36 14 6 56

Sikkim 7 2 2 11

Tamil Nadu 185 61 42 288

Uttar Pradesh 121 32 21 174

West Bengal 237 82 41 360

Total 1285 488 262 2035

Projected Participants From States

Projected No. of Participants

11

515

65107

22 17

165

41

190

1356

11

288

174

360

0

100

200

300

400

500

600A

nd

am

an

Nic

ob

ar

An

dh

ra P

rad

es

h

As

sa

m

Bih

ar

Ch

att

isg

arh

Go

a

Gu

jra

t

Jh

ark

ha

nd

Ka

rna

tak

a

Me

gh

ala

ya

Ori

ss

a

Sik

kim

Ta

milN

aid

u

Utt

arP

rad

es

h

We

st

Be

ng

al

State Attended

OPT DCA DSS GIS Total

Andaman & Nicobar 1 1 0 0 2

Andhra Pradesh 140 124 37 14 315

Assam 20 1 0 0 21

Bihar 34 33 0 0 67

Chattisgarh 15 0 0 0 15

Goa 4 1 0 0 5

Gujarat 70 51 16 0 137

Jharkhand 19 5 0 0 24

Karnataka 72 6 2 0 80

Meghalaya 0 0 0 0 0

Orissa 21 4 1 0 26

Sikkim 8 0 0 0 8

Tamil Nadu 100 48 16 0 164

Uttar Pradesh 91 0 0 0 91

West Bengal 157 73 31 0 261

Total 752 347 103 14 1216

Attendance From Different States (As on February 28, 2003)

State-wise Attendance (As on 28.2.2003)

1

140

20

34

15

4

70

19

72

0

21

8

100

91

157

1

124

1

33

0 1

51

5 60

40

48

0

73

0

37

0 0 0 0

16

0 2 0 1 0

16

0

31

0

14

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180A

nd

am

an

& N

ico

ba

r

An

dh

ra P

rad

esh

Ass

am

Bih

ar

Ch

att

isg

arh

Go

a

Gu

jara

t

Jha

rkh

an

d

Ka

rna

taka

Me

gh

ala

ya

Ori

ssa

Sik

kim

Ta

mil

Na

du

Utt

ar

Pra

de

sh

We

st B

en

ga

l

OPT

DCA

DSS

GIS

Percentage of Attendance From States (As on February 28, 2003)

State Percentage

Andaman & Nicobar 18.18

Andhra Pradesh 56.6

Assam 32.3

Bihar 48.6

Chattisgarh 68.1

Goa 29.4

Gujarat 83

Jharkhand 58.5

Karnataka 42.1

Meghalaya 0

Orissa 46.4

Sikkim 72.7

Tamil Nadu 56.9

Uttar Pradesh 52.2

West Bengal 72.5

Percentage Attendance From States (As on February 28, 2003)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

An

dam

an N

ico

bar

An

dh

ra P

rad

esh

Ass

am

Bih

ar

Ch

atti

sgar

h

Go

a

Gu

jrat

Jhar

khan

d

Kar

nat

aka

Meg

hal

aya

Ori

ssa

Sik

kim

Tam

ilN

aid

u

Utt

arP

rad

esh

Wes

t B

eng

al

Directorate/FO wise breakup from different Centers

Location LevelDirectorate Projected Attended

OPT DCA DSS Total OPT DCA DSS GIS Total

Guntur RO&RAL

Dte. of Marketing & Inspection 42 42 17 101 9 9

Vijayavada FO

Dte of Plant Protection, Quarantine & storage 13 2 1 16 5 1 6

Visakhapatnam FO


Vizag SO

Dte. of Marketing & Inspection 3 1 1 5 3 1 4

Total 65 47 21 133 18 14 1 33

Guntur

Directorate/FO wise breakup from different Centers

Hyderabad

Location Level DirectorateOPT DCA DSS Total OPT DCA DSS GIS Total

Hyderabad FO

Dte of Plant Protection, Quarantine & storage 77 30 25 132 62 60 9 8 131

Hyderabad FO

Dte. Of Economics & Statistics 2 2 1 5 2 1 1 4

Hyderabad HqrsDte. of Oil Seeds Development 24 12 11 47 11 12 6 29

Hyderabad SO

Dte. of Marketing & Inspection 18 8 4 30 17 17 10 5 44

Hyderabad SOAll India Soil and Land Use Survey 28 10 2 40 15 13 1 1 29

Hyderabad, Begumpet FO


Hyderabad, Somajegudda FO

Dte of Plant Protection, Quarantine & storage 19 4 1 24 0

Raipur FO

Dte of Plant Protection, Quarantine & storage 19 2 1 22 15 15

Total 191 69 45 305 126 107 27 14 260

Projected Attended


FO


FO


SO&RAL

Dte. of Marketing & Inspection 10 6 6 22 1 1

Hqrs

N-East Reg. Farm Mech. Trg. & Training Inst. 11 4 2 17 6 1 7

RO

National Biofertilizer Development centre 12 2 2 16 2 2

FO

Dte. Of Economics & Statistics 3 2 0 5 0

SO&RAL

Dte. of Marketing & Inspection 4 2 2 8 0

FO


FO


FO


Total 0 0 78 101 119 160 164 147 0 28

Projected Attended

Gangtok/Guwahati


Hazaribagh HqrsSoil Conserv. Trg. Centre 9 6 6 21 0

Patna FO


Patna FO


Patna HqrsDte. of Rice Development 15 9 2 26 11 11 22

Patna SO

Dte. of Marketing & Inspection 18 9 9 36 11 10 21

Purnia Hqrs

Soil conserv. Res. Demo and Trg. Centre 0

Total 62 27 18 107 34 33 0 0 67

Projected Attended

Patna


Gorakhpur FO


Kanpur FO


Kanpur SO&RALDte. of Marketing & Inspection 35 6 7 48 24 24

Lucknow FO


Lucknow FO

Dte. Of Economics & Statistics 7 5 0 12 5 5

Lucknow HqrsDte. of Sugarcane Development 18 3 3 24 12 12

Varanasi FO


Varanasi SODte. of Marketing & Inspection 6 4 4 14 6 6

Total 121 32 21 174 91 0 0 0 91

Projected Attended

Lucknow


Port Blair FO

Dte of Plant Protection, Quarantine & storage 9 1 1 11 1 1 0 2

Ranchi SOAll India Soil and Land Use Survey 29 10 2 41 19 5 24

Bhubaneshwar FO


Bhubaneshwar RO

National Biofertilizer Development centre 12 5 2 19 6 2 8

Bhubneshwar SO&RALDte. of Marketing & Inspection 5 2 2 9 4 2 1 7

Bhuvaneshar FO


Burdwan FO


Calcatta RO&RALDte. of Marketing & Inspection 44 17 17 78 30 28 10 68

Calcatta HqrsDte. of J ute Development 23 11 5 39 21 8 7 36

Calcatta SOAll India Soil and Land Use Survey 64 23 6 93 37 14 5 56

Calcutta -AJ C Bose Road FO

Pay & Accounts office 28 13 1 42 0

Calcatta, Salt Lake FO


Kolkata FO

Dte. Of Economics & Statistics 4 2 0 6 4 4

Nadia (Near Kolkata) FO

Central Fertilizer Qulaity Control & Trg. Inst. 9 3 3 15 6 1 7

Nadia, Calutta FO


Total 311 107 50 341 198 83 32 0 313

Projected Attended

Kolkata


Ahmedabad FO


Ahmedabad SODte. of Marketing & Inspection 7 3 3 13 3 5 2 10

Ahmedabad SOAll India Soil and Land Use Survey 32 10 2 44 22 19 4 45

Baroda FO


Bhavnagar FO

Dte of Plant Protection, Quarantine & storage 0 1 1

Gandhinagar, Kandla FO


J amnagar SO&RALDte. of Marketing & Inspection 8 1 1 10 6 2 2 10

Palanpur FO


Rajkot SO&RALDte. of Marketing & Inspection 17 5 5 27 13 11 4 28

Surat SODte. of Marketing & Inspection 6 5 5 16 2 2 2 6

Total 116 30 19 165 70 49 18 0 137

Projected Attended

Gandhi Nagar


Goa FO


Margoan SODte. of Marketing & Inspection 2 2 2 6 0

Panaji SODte. of Marketing & Inspection 1 1 1 3 0

Banglore FO


Banglore FO


Banglore RO

National Biofertilizer Development centre 12 5 2 19 6 6

Banglore SOAll India Soil and Land Use Survey 64 24 6 94 37 37

Banglore SO&RALDte. of Marketing & Inspection 17 6 6 29 15 3 18

Manglore SO&RALDte. of Marketing & Inspection 2 1 1 4 0

Raichur SODte. of Marketing & Inspection 4 3 3 10 2 1 1 4

Bodinayaknaor SO&RAL


Chennai FO


Chennai FO

Dte. Of Economics & Statistics 2 1 0 3 1 1 2

Chennai FO

Central Fertilizer Qulaity Control & Trg. Inst. 9 3 0 12 5 3 1 9

Chennai RO&RALDte. of Marketing & Inspection 56 18 18 92 33 31 9 73

Chennai - Beasant Nagar FO

Pay & Accounts office 28 13 1 42 0

Madras HqrsDte. of Tobacco Development 8 2 2 12 6 6

Nagapattanam SO


Tirupur SODte. of Marketing & Inspection 8 7 7 22 3 1 2 6

Trichy FO


Tuticorin FO


Tuticorin SO&RALDte. of Marketing & Inspection 4 1 1 6 2 2

Virudhunnagar SO&RALDte. of Marketing & Inspection 4 1 1 6 2 2

316 110 69 495 176 55 18 0 249

Projected Attended

Chennai

Feedback from some of the centres

Content Coverage

OPT

FeedbackNo. of Opinions

Adequate 549

Too less 21

Too detailed 0

Can't say 0

No opinion 0

DCA

Adequate 169

Too less 117

Too detailed 22

Can't say 0

No opinion 2

DSS

Adequate 122

Too less 12

Too detailed 8

Can't say 18

No opinion 0

Teaching faculty

OPT

FeedbackNo. ofPersons

Very Effective 49

Effective 7

Less Effective 0

Not Effective 0

No opinion 1

DCA

Very Effective 13

Effective 18

Less Effective 0

Not Effective 0

No opinion 0

DSS

Very Effective 5

Effective 9

Less Effective 0

Not Effective 0

No opinion 0

Hands on session

OPT


Very Useful 36

Useful 21

Less Useful 0

Not Useful 0

No opinion 0

DCA

Very Useful 11

Useful 20

Less Useful 0

Not Useful 0

No opinion 0

DSS

Very Useful 3

Useful 11

Less Useful 0

Not Useful 0

No opinion 0

Food Quality

OPT

FeedbackNo. of Persons

Excellent 17

Very Good 19

Good 8

Fair 12

No opinion 1

DCA

Excellent 1

Very Good 11

Good 14

Fair 5

No opinion 0

DSS

Excellent 0

Very Good 0

Good 11

Fair 3

No opinion 0

Feedback from Gandhinagar

Content Coverage

OPT


Adequate 165

Too less 0

Too detailed 55

Can't say 0

No opinion 0

Teaching faculty

OPT


Very Effective 17

Effective 5

Less Effective 0

Not Effective 0

No opinion 0

Hands on session

OPT


Very Useful 12

Useful 10

Less Useful 0

Not Useful 0

No opinion 0

Food Quality

OPT


Excellent 10

Very Good 5

Good 6

Fair 1

No opinion 0

Feedback from Gangtok

Content Coverage

OPT


Adequate 958

Too less 46

Too detailed 112

Can't say 87

No opinion 47

DCA

Adequate 208

Too less 18

Too detailed 4

Can't say 0

No opinion 0

Teaching faculty

OPT


Very Effective 91

Effective 34

Less Effective 0

Not Effective 0

No opinion 0

DCA

Very Effective 19

Effective 4

Less Effective 0

Not Effective 0

No opinion 0

Hands on session

OPT


Very Useful 56

Useful 65

Less Useful 2

Not Useful 2

No opinion 0

DCA

Very Useful 16

Useful 5

Less Useful 2

Not Useful 0

No opinion 0

Food Quality

OPT


Excellent 16

Very Good 34

Good 66

Fair 8

No opinion 1

DCA

Excellent 7

Very Good 2

Good 13

Fair 1

No opinion 0

Feedback from Hyderabad

Content Coverage

OPT


Adequate 1275

Too less 226

Too detailed 246

Can't say 28

No opinion 265

DCA

Adequate 592

Too less 117

Too detailed 52

Can't say 18

No opinion 61

DSS

Adequate 225

Too less 40

Too detailed 12

Can't say 15

No opinion 28

Teaching faculty

OPT


Very Effective 135

Effective 62

Less Effective 1

Not Effective 0

No opinion 6

DCA

Very Effective 38

Effective 41

Less Effective 1

Not Effective 0

No opinion 4

DSS

Very Effective 11

Effective 19

Less Effective 1

Not Effective 0

No opinion 1

Hands on session

OPT


Very Useful 106

Useful 90

Less Useful 0

Not Useful 0

No opinion 8

DCA

Very Useful 38

Useful 43

Less Useful 0

Not Useful 0

No opinion 3

DSS

Very Useful 11

Useful 19

Less Useful 1

Not Useful 0

No opinion 1

Food Quality

OPT


Excellent 49

Very Good 82

Good 61

Fair 7

No opinion 5

DCA

Excellent 8

Very Good 29

Good 35

Fair 9

No opinion 3

DSS

Excellent 0

Very Good 9

Good 14

Fair 8

No opinion 1

Feedback from Kolkata

Content Coverage

OPT


Adequate 265

Too less 31

Too detailed 8

Can't say 0

No opinion 0

Teaching faculty

OPT


Very Effective 14

Effective 18

Less Effective 0

Not Effective 0

No opinion 2

Hands on session

OPT


Very Useful 13

Useful 20

Less Useful 0

Not Useful 0

No opinion 1

Food Quality

OPT


Excellent 1

Very Good 19

Good 12

Fair 1

No opinion 1

Feedback from Patna

Content Coverage

OPT


Adequate 587

Too less 62

Too detailed 133

Can't say 4

No opinion 20

DCA

Adequate 462

Too less 11

Too detailed 25

Can't say 2

No opinion 50

DSS

Adequate 87

Too less 12

Too detailed 10

Can't say 1

No opinion 80

Teaching faculty

OPT


Very Effective 111

Effective 43

Less Effective 1

Not Effective 0

No opinion 21

DCA

Very Effective 38

Effective 16

Less Effective 0

Not Effective 0

No opinion 1

DSS

Very Effective 9

Effective 6

Less Effective 0

Not Effective 0

No opinion 4

Hands on session

OPT


Very Useful 69

Useful 78

Less Useful 6

Not Useful 0

No opinion 23

DCA

Very Useful 29

Useful 24

Less Useful 0

Not Useful 0

No opinion 2

DSS

Very Useful 8

Useful 7

Less Useful 0

Not Useful 0

No opinion 4

Food Quality

OPT


Excellent 16

Very Good 53

Good 72

Fair 15

No opinion 20

DCA

Excellent 2

Very Good 5

Good 27

Fair 20

No opinion 1

DSS

Excellent 0

Very Good 2

Good 13

Fair 0

No opinion 4

Feedback from Chennai