D
is5
.5I.
5.5
.05:,
is0
5iS
is
SW
.W
IOtS
.
Fw
n,t
3.5
.0.r
rt,I
c.L
,’trW
Sa
SW
4W
LS
’
St.
.,00
.0
..’
tur3
.00n310000
Spy.,.’
.S
ly.’
SIii
p5.0
Ilf
lah
Irn
,.u
.
p.;.,
—isn
.m
is S.
fLO
Ps0Y
.iiy
Jt0
50
0.1
1P
50
01
000
doA
l0lt0
ILl
I-MN
.00
trn
04
Lo
z0
Id
.dn
1Iu
Dtlfllfl
CO
yflO
doiS
is0.0
105.5
155.0
ONLP
SI
0511051
0011
10.0
liL
y.0
0005.5
1Ii
dii
,30
$S
000S
o.0
isc’1
nts00
La).
0010
1055
lis’
305
15.0
50’
0.0
sLu
;10
0115
1005
11S
cn
oi
13
50
5.1
01
05
05
10
01
05
51
15)3
033
AN
V*f
lSON
INOZ
•1
CL
•.0C
0-C
.P
11
13.
XII
11510
5111
1511
ni_li
U.0
:S‘L
I-ca
5.0
0S
iO
nci
.0t.
:31
.05..
slo
op
—n
,0
00:1
111300
311510
010
311
0530
001
050
100
350O
I310030
5300
,05.0
oiso
yS
I]
•00.
LO
IOL
S•o]
I
ni-coo
__5.,—
I
OL.O
Vni
03
lI0
s5
10
54
55
51
50
15
*1
0355
305.
Ifl.
55051535015*i
03
505*1
01*1is
01i.
0ls
.0oo0
50
05
00
11
00
-00
uii
00
31
53
10
ds
5355
1111
01S
till
S
0000305030311
OuM
Lll
yS
Dois
535511,1
013101110
PS
I,I
0301
1030
0050
503
It1351500
W(I
d31
1S
00
LID
p,-
ipD
•.i1
I-0I
API
S,Il
lS
MiD
N10
0Nfl
ON
IM3N
SN
DI1
3d
9,rc-rL
0©
0
j-s
\/
I00051.0
0000300ii
IIIO
SIf
l00
1151=
3513001000
fr-
lo*o4It3
01003Isni
I.;.r:.I.r.-0tooo:I:onr;oN
r:I
fooos-so,’
osooyty
.-I
Itnni
LI5
15
35
10
3L
I*
P5
VI35S
dI
0000
flS
15035500
01I1
40*dio
ScII
SW
0100j
YS
iCL
SiO
Ois
HS
IS5100
/‘I’
‘
.\
-
--
00
0:5
0,:
]
11
10135.0
1liS
a.
-•0.
——5
NF
51
fld
Lflr
00
01
5I.
0.I
I.is
.iy
Iib
l-
“1.
- //
5/
-
‘S
.-
/53lI
II0IT
p3530S
•-
—t
__rI
-
IS01010555001)4
515.5
0555
-0/,
//N
‘\.
510*77
PS
35C
1533004
1.0
0C
)._
S_
.lI1
S1
oW
01
10
IS
-5..
0.
ldii
dd
oo
I05
10
0Il
Wll
WIO
iu)0
S00.1
013010.L
iS15
11—
-A0010003.0
5.0
0001511)0
1-
—
10
535i’
0oI3
SIi
s0l1
00105
5.’
is-.
-0
-
•1
0
‘i
to
‘4-‘
•0
I,%
,Ot•
t._
I’:.
.10
5151
Sr_
St
‘3,
•‘
15
_
535.
500
0.5
11L
IO
P1
)35
yfl
IHO
ISO
Iidw
Sd
IX’
51503
-I
‘o“_
— —<
01I0flL
300S
X.0
3S
O03
-N
-_
0-0
w.i
soo,
stO
iIis
PlS
lo;i
l004
- 5-
:4
--
0051
0y.0
y]y
I0000001S
Ii
rR
/103455:0
0-5
.5.5
.03
1.0
.1_I
/0
---
y.l
IIct&
o.o
003fl
a-5
01
/S
ISis
SES
OU
Sa
LOS
W0
2C
11
1I
.;‘P
SL
IS
/..
-‘
-
-/
0’
0,
c.t’
CD
DC
5,0
,tO
XI
ci
tOIS
O0-
1115
10C
I;00
510
5I_
lOll
000
W31
1D
3O
d
I01il
Mr0
yM
Ild
N0U
110]
UiI
O4O
DSO
NIS
Sari
SmlN
aovr
oyN
5’
ON
UN
nI
Odla
sooll
Xli
Nvld
N0ft
vs]
I310gs0
Nfl
0001
5111
ON
UN
Sid
OdM
0000
I]00
01O
4YJO
ON
O1
fLyl
dU
flO
ifl
1501
5001
315
XyO
0311
0101
0rdo
15&
ISIE
ifl3
Od
XC
kY
cC
50
V
SrI
010
1.S
raoI’
S300iC
o1a
05:0
3100
1315
03
36
XO
S13N
Vc
£300
0100
1015
110
1001
o1/id
oA30
0lO
Nroost
‘00,
011
ON
id31
$00
0501
0103
1100
00
M3I
A3
FN1d
ailS
-X]
ONI D
NW
VN
a
01’J
01fl
3!IH
DO
00S3
ND
I
S3
NO
I
D
I
C0
0.0
or -
—k 0>-. 0
m
7=- --
-
N-ç
N
/C —
7/ /
CL
1
S
/
/
/ )//
/oL
C
\
/
C
CU
0C1 d
0,
S
-UInr
000
z6 Z1Z
DI
n 0 3 —
--
-‘--••
CC)
CC
DC
Zo
i•
it
bt,
iii’
Iii)
i
.5t’
i.ii
isIi
•ii.,..,,
‘%
tt,.,i,,,tti..isi..,,
-.
it•bi
it•tit
•‘
iii,
btiitii,tsb
tt*biiitit
••‘-‘i.tsttiii,iti’i’tIti
‘t’4
’i,itiiD
titiitt.,
•‘7
1t!
bittfl,,’ttt
btl’i,i,iit,
it
iIittitttt•bit•
i5ttitt
it.
Ub
itititib
iti
itI,
ttiiititttU
ti
i,t,tii.7
.ttt
t,btttiti,t,Itbs
itt.’,
t.I.’,o
sit
t•tItiflt
U.itt,titr.t.
.5.5
UU
ti
Uit
itis
flU
”•,flb.’.t,,fl,ttt.tt
t’btk
st’ij
ttit,
.5it
.,•tisit,i.t.fltsi,•.i,tt
tiliti
bitsil
it‘I
iiit
Ub
,t.t.tf,•fl.,.
‘‘itt,,,
tt.5,.tn
iti..,
ii‘I
iiit
Di
ii
i,ttiitU
uuittittt
b.ittiil
.b
tit
i,ist..itittt,’tit,,t,,t,
t.
Liii!t
,,t*
ttttttb
tttts
iiittttt
itit
iiii
itit
itt
iii,
itit
ttis
lit
‘itit
twi,,.tn
tt
IAtt’-
Uit
iiit’
iiis
I.It
FIt
1
isU
iiii
at_
i
.i..tt,eA
iiit
•‘tit!tititi.n
,,.,t,t_
t
Ott,
th
uU
t.
LU
ti
iiU
•
O.ti,e
,htl,ic
,•itiot9iIttIttihi
BOLLA
RDtiG
HT
LUA
lOl
-
r
rm
isR
r;,
Itpttltat.t
t
a
,s.a
*,i
it...,,
tgii,,,.,t.tt
-il
ii
sA
itt
ties
it•
“I.,,
,-.tm
t,I,.’
tt—,t
it’s,
t,it,I.F
sti:
ttiit,ttsn
tA
.t:.tit.ts.s.I
5—
—
Iit.tutu
is
Li
it’
—.ti,
‘ti-
s—
i
—Li&.
——
——
—._
‘d
ull
UU
——
‘a
IIII
——
N
ta,S
fl2
t_
._
t’
tAA
ttLU
’.:’
”C
Ci
tSaT
fl
03
flD
p..
=1
,‘..i.t..tttii
:t.r:
Uii,
UI
Ii
•ii
7
ii,,,.
ii
it
ii
-cN
sT
Arrv
LE
cJO
NE
SJO
NE
S4
RL
.HI1
EC
TU
E
CA
TA
LO
GM
BE
RL
OG
IC
‘Stt
C
i-—
rn
9’
L..5
Wt
tIN“C
Ut
IiiP
otru
sti,1
ti
t%iif
ltltt
4ciL
)
L.
P—
‘,.._I,,.
L_L
i
rr
-:-
[p-ic
UG
HT
ING
_Z
2afv
&z’
I-...,.
..
LV
611SU
RFA
CE
MO
UN
TB
RIC
K,
STE
PA
ND
WA
LLU
GH
T
SN
’
?7’
—o--:.
PELICAN
BREWIN
GLIN
COLN
CITV
LSIG
NLIGHT
•itttttiis
,•
I-tilb
St_
,:,iti_ti
U...
—‘
,-
I’
Dlii
t..t.tuiqn
is’
•ltito
bt-
7.—
s.
—it:’,
It’ts-std
•fl_
i—
etititi’it
ttW
iSt
LIit
is,.
.tu
itt?13t5’IIt
i.t.t-bit,
Ut’
,ttti.’.t
‘nit
itU
ttii,,tti
Uit
it’.’
::
CA
BM
AR
‘9-Cl,
Sill
HW
YIC
’L
INC
OL
NC
ITY
,O
R
SITEPLA
NR
EVtW
-5—
tilt...
it.liii
SITELIC-HTING
PLANASD
CU
JSHEETS
wt
C’L
wA
sc-re
c::c
ens
soS
.tI
use
IL.s1S
,
*5
_S
.c
TR
W3C
5
JON
ES
JON
ES
ARCH
ITECTURE
r[:5
0S
TIA
NO
c*oC
N,‘;a
P
—
C&
O•C
19
-01
7
PREUMINARY
BUILDINGELEVATIONS
LUA
200
cC
c.
w.a
*S’SIESA
EnL
p,a
a,
!an.u
TtD
==-i
PP
PP
PC
AL
p,p
a!jG
s_S
tyeu
OA
a:u
S_S
’CO
ASIA
1*!
YR
YT
LE
U
——
-7;:
5_
tAt
.Ta
‘C‘.fl
•sS
.AC
AL
_S
‘IAP
.*-57C‘5555
5.5U
PP
PP
PP
PP
P
—In
S*’n
LS
6L
I
-L
.5$
P
PEUCANBREW
INGU
NCO
U4
crrv
‘IllunY
*1151-
loll
HW
Y101
LINC
OLN
CITY
OR
SITEPLAN
REVIEW
—C
a
051
5*
5*5
1.
IllS
5A
.Z’C
J—
/
557555005
QS
F
•005
H--
-
--
-.S
zlA
aA
Fool
5150555955001
5UL
ON
APL
AIE
5277SF
I-v_v-c
——
-—a
-—
—-
——
—
C
III
25‘2
—-
25
I
EASEM
ENT
TABLEnO
PU
RP
OIE
RW
UR
O4
I1134*
3RA
S4AC
E=
TA
RIb
Ck’
CEI•
30
494TO
NS
Afl
iWA
llClR
VA
fl3V
UIIU
TTI
LIN
CR
i0T
?I
21I9—519fl
TOV
illAiN
FRI5*
REIC
IER
WICK
21FA
CE
72TV
VillA
iN
Pincas
OT
TI
301902073
I0
VillA
iNTIRE
4VIR
%N
T&
UItIFY
Paz
‘I
IA
WN
W4
TCE
TO&fl
‘RO
IL.
P85*?!
ICWK
V(A
SU
CA
TL
ISA004
4*3is1
.o
LIC
AT
OR
AR
CW
CiW
I,
CON
STRUCTIO
NN
OK
aI
03*1151ST
STAN
DA
RD
OP
8
203411555?
CD
WW
OX
WA
LL—
mTV
UM
ZW
.RO
RT
EU
IflA
%$
15w
AflA
L030t
IC
1M
CT
oni
I0345751257
A04%
RLT
ICC
IOR
.
4030
151C
rfloO
RO
NC
tSP
03
fl
300’
NS
f03C
C?!
ORIN
ZW4T
P41501ST
nO.
bit
10035
115004C
2.5’PA
RK
IRC
VL
On
mc
740
PAR%
I•45SO
RE
ST
VF
RO
8034551C
TV
OW
DJT
T5
75
CC
?!S
CV
IC
VSTA
NSA
RD
*15
aE
P41155
sTALL
IDTA
R25L
PM
WV
CSTA
LL
oA
DA
A0
3B
1P
411815504.
•2’T
mA
=S
.SP
AC
AA15*04.ar
Fat:
5045
‘3STA
nDA
RD
PA
bTA
CSTA
LLS
IRP
NC
4C
OR
P4CT
P414*45
STALL
5151540
ISLA
ND
SCA
PEA
REA.
I’£040745
SOR
E
TVIRSTA
LLA
C*
TA
:It.LW
AA
TPC
SW
.
IVA
C4301
S.’
IC
OQ
L”IIO
VIllA
SW
ALKA
RC04110
7’FALTRAL
flLP
.!DL
VASTAILK
5l
toR
OT
EN
LR
•00404
POST.
45
P4191715904.
PRIV
ATE
PIN
SLO
TU
OIIS
CPO
STM
IDP011545
EOA
SIRU
CT
110(5
784
1P
AIR
S
—ao
ccaJit
PR
070
30
01545047
90
4
P80
41
95
CA
flW
ALL
04RE
CSW
IAL
*4058
PA
IEW
IT*481945
591
PA
Z
0H
arperH
oofPeterson
Ritzhellis
Inc.
,,..ss
-5
15?fl.-.4
-.
vfl*
:p.•
,.i:1llI.
—R
SSUL
IAIL
JON
ES
AP
C:-E
;LiE
0R
Ar,
4.50
:IV
IR’J
1123
hO
tLIT
ISV
aPELICAN
BREWIN
GLIN
COLN
CITY
9-c
l,
5911-SV
Yill
LIN
CO
LN
CITY.
OR
759
Oo
VT
RI.
9511
884*1913CIVILSITE
PLAN
0150
C)O
CD
CO
O
JON
ES
A’-
--
.
—--
-
—--—
I/
HIG
HW
AY
101
?A51O
T595
IIAA
O-.n
o
4007
071134401W
-5900R
OT
nlA
W
97
II’It
SO
t—
]4
40
8’
--in--i
TA
XI?
“IO
TIIJ4S
A1
no
SILETZBA
Y
TA
XT
57511454-IX
SITEPLA
NREV
IEW
/
ftco
T0
71
I30
40
0T
SR
C:,
:1
•-”’--
-C-L
t-iIT
CD
C..:C,
0C
C
EASEM
ENT
TABLEI.
PuR
P
0’
L’Y
IAC
.RA
OA
AZ
I6
‘30
R4
6340
6€€3
CAZ
D
®0
10
JNL
AC
60
77
Dc’S
-now
C‘tS
AR
06017377
&30
64a
733
RO
ER
toR
;ldT
&A
TSITYL
RC
NC
T?
20
11
’DflT
J70
PEMA
IN
EXISflN
GLEG
END
:57054
IE6€
166tA
?A
*7
‘to
o6A
i?fl
,U
SC
tsP
oo.E
or
02E
700
SIC
-
-
IN3S
CL
ISC
Li/fl
55
656
€/C
‘70?&
.INa,
0I0
55!0
N5.7
.705
0a.
Ca.s
.6—
I
JON
ES
JON
ES:,flf
U’EC
TUR
E
Np
o’,c
a’to
,nss
63I’ar
10
aPELICAN
BREWIN
GLIN
COLN
tnis-C
l,
SR
Ifl
107
LIN
CO
LN
CIT
YC
R
‘-O.
II:
_.I.l
‘t6€6
76
tT
T
T•0
5fl0
6O
TO
I‘0
06
C60
•*•TR
740€‘if
€0
07
’.
10’E
La.
C,•IIT
h1
c!tR
C—
6*306176
17706C
R0(1
76
CAO
NCT
644T
6I0
WO
O
a.’
to.’
727
•f’S
SI
Cat
‘AN
5’”
726
•
26
6071
7717
606766513T6C
60106055076
0105676604
17
1101A
S6*07500
‘tOO
lS’S
NC
041760*457/
allO
tITO
MEA
TS1101
AS
6076110
—-
sij’To’In
OO
T
Z_T
hb6’
T,nC
OtP
i7JID
A,I
717/I
76774777
7R
EA
mr
53
04
50
6645
05/In
NS
L1547006
AND6€/a.
-5--
______-<
-
US.
HWY
1075
.•
..
(7
1p
JJ;A4
yQ
JT
7/tx
&.
——
.-
____
___
CoK
.-
.T
_
-.
,rno_,
II
Io
c7
/QI4
FO
XL
LO
‘r
if€
In
on
€rt
*.A
a
I£
7W
ON‘O
&O
TA
N.D
—
(470060
(LO
ON
CL
I,,.,.t
I-——
—
-.
—‘0
U•
co
a,r
aeo
rL
xA
.rc
.
is
coo
-..-
-—z/H
//Jo,,
—-
-_‘ffsq
76
53
—
—.m
.267
C’
IN
006D
RO
E6176457
:67
/or
‘°IO
-
EX
O06C
RO
E6A
C?R
DW
rA
t‘
.\
\:
I17
PE
As-to
.C
r0770
4•0504701
7017/
71143177030057
iNPLA
CE.
.
7*11177/355070
IDA
EO
IAL
4D
13-,
.1N>
-.
.o:
b-
K‘ttC
C/
I—
FN0,’O
Ofl
65(74760/
I-
rn”cC
Asoon->
’A
I-P
r0A
’C,.z
rC
,7
67>
7275074
70
I3
AA
2.
One
MO
tto.
‘AS
—
5—
--
05451I’
—30
SILE1ZBA
Y
£7
07
17
64
47
7P
at..
306(7
60247
NoN
LU
/TO
tAL
00K
OE
wC
(11
5
\
SITEPLA
NREV
IEW
65760
0605
677
S’•It
(67
066
505771‘0
5
Son
ST
05O
S0
61
0O
•i1I600a,
41_O
tISN
6IT
a5’A
IIC6I
*0
Sc6
C_
OnA
6O
556
a.O
6•lP
l.T:L
60
II”tl.
106510
fltW
’N
057
.t*0
flT
S’A
i.R
60
_iN
SI
CaIro.
Tr
67
4’o
.I•1
5,1
741
’10C
r7765
50
0.T
14
SNoWT
’Oa
DEM
OLEG
END
SA
C?
ff1/I
/I//I
FF
///JJJII
555277O
sla
Nts
,,7/
K6
04
017
0
OCTO
KP60001(0
jt\
harper
eHPJIlo
uf
PetersonR
ighelLis
Inc.
3IlF
S0505.
Sob
351T
,sAa.A
IN717112
7r5
’U
ZL
IIS
IsoO
sa
5,
a.i*
II7t
//
//
(1’
65500.6*
calls—IT.
Nil
EXISTIN
GCO
ND
ITION
S&
DEM
OPLA
N
C200
VI
CC
cc
\.___
_I
JON
ES
-------- __
GRA
DIN
GO
VA
NPlIE
S0
A5
I04A
1.0LV
c_Jr1450713
CT
Ft
Wia
IE3
I.
CT
wPaqT
LlW
CTM
AXCA
TP
9l_
___
__
__
__
__
__
__
_.3
FT
MAX
Pt
CEPINL
OF
T
CThEC
IAc_*IC
JAn?IrE
SA
0C
APE
AS
ESIIMA
IEF
ognm
s0150
PuP
Paas
CA
LF.ThE
05*
35
0w
AN
lI&3
350Mw
AS
OS
tCO
NC
’A
CC
OT
SW
FASU
93
50
WE
0IW
O5524
OZ
ArO
SOflC
CA
tSsI5
c5
wc
9’W
AC
ES
ICL
0542
$’A
SZ
MS
FP.ALL
RE
I,a’ACAAOSM
GL
lt.’Y501
raL
Vt
lIEIA
3040*flS
PC
AM
EEQ
SlIE
S0
*0
•ICC
PO
UO
.TW
A!IO
WA
0w
SIrTh4L
Too
TC
Afl
ICs6
.Thx
rlI
tX
0so
MO
CE
IC3d
PE
QS
Am
cSM
CC
CA
WW
IC
an
t5501220
ao
Iro.C
AL
S0Ir
nc
SIaasso
LSOA
IT1±
01
50
eH
arperH
oufP
etersonR
iuhellisInc.
5.0
.011
T,.s.L
5n
-j0IS
IOllIN
rl•fl5
.
EASEM
ENT
TABLEra
QM
wS
RU
1S
&
[W
ElD
SC
OSA
RIW
NI
83
35
20PA
CE90
MCFATA
9091143505
IA0T
h
op
n.o,
ni-o
n,
‘t90,0*14
IIn
P_JOE
90C
Iflt*1
4
GH
90SE
09
0104
00
IC
1.9
OT
T90
lOW
SP
ar
I
001315
05415425[
31005O
?ASSSE
NI
7m
aQ
SS
Il.
JON
ESA
RC
:-IIIEC
TJR
E
‘0904
515
551
011O
IlPC
ITIM
C0511905
97005I
9014
05990
—I
550
99
LEGEN
D:93
PW
QS
=51.0
!M
1aA
4P
90
50
1W
59
0!
CCAAT
WO
07311.0
54
.0!
CC
AM
TWR
0737340
54909X
TW
9
PELICAN
BREWiN
GLIN
COLN
CITY
19-C
IT
611154.Ifl
illLIN
CO
LNC
ITY.
CR
XA
17301140
40
19
.937515
97
54
75
35
4(5
CA
35OC
STL
XI
11Th*93
Wj1
NW
C
_-
___
_
__
__E
___
——
A—
-—
—
__
________
—
::50o;”?Ztj
!‘ItL
0n
A0
C7l12’s99
7/
--
--
-
71
-IC
3O
...‘
--
——
-I
I&
90
/tIIs-li3
(0,0
801
-I
C5
13
55
0
\ç
(All_
JEt)
(±1
40
•
(±I4
2ro
)-.
--
-°.t
/!--
-
—
--
BC\
-
--
-
z-_V
NN
5•.
-.
‘-‘
N
-N
—-
-
.
.W
it
-\
9IS
II9
CA
o3390
-—
--SILE7Z
BAY
-
_
w:::/:.:J
,çT
OT
\llTh-’.-
.‘
_
V1
0,1
1I.
—23
SITEP
UN
REVIEW0
5•
11
959
—04_T
oll
514
905
-n
o.
PRELIMIN
ARY
GRA
DIN
GPLA
N
0300
0017
3t 3U
1s!
TTaq
!)1
—
NV
1dA
fl1I
IAuo
siaj
adJn
ofl
AN
VN
II’iI
l]dd
ath
iuj
.3-P
T2S
I_—
Cl
Di
ClS
ala
a
M]I
A]U
Nd
ajis
AflO
N1O
DN
I1N
V3i
1d
e
C(L
YIa
LD
COS
0195
A.2
4C
mi
011
01
34
31
03
I4
S.3
30S
5)
01Ic
1s_
Moa
33(W
C9
d
$1:
-3
(193
)n
O04
11,9
70ad
Ilt
i-3W
-as,.o
s‘3
3v0.
01w
Om
.1A
,,I
3103
L$O
*ID
OS
J’Il
1191
1918
*13
1*;0
Odd
fr70
13)1
yT
hIl
la
1OSW
V3O
1953
343
3139
031830357013
‘311
3131
1©
dil
l37133270045.3
fl
05111100
.03305
3133
0C
i
4133
•3
7133
170
3533
5.1
110
©-,
T13
3:.’
p3uQ
.03sQ
OScla
dM
W)’
0)1
333
3023
3319
0019
3334
303
1503
33OS
‘C
nJC
3333
00503015
Wll
-3(1
31)
£70045.1
301
53•
I(3
1)11
045
.3£a
3303
—II
(MN
)—
39
03
.11
Cl
CT93’
1919
030
033
4033
135
10
44
0.
1930
10$071393
0503084
loll
•3
(MN)
110
345
I30
8508
030
Ill
3333
010
093380113
50
19
11
30
30503015
{J)I
(435
)470
345
.130
15X
C’
•19
1911
1I0
0aS
30yoC
13
DT
htO
3O
SO
Oca
d©
3373
•3
(4.0
110
3411
.330
15i9
—i—
‘NM
111
1.N
CS
S‘9
33
80
30
50
85
33
33
Co
il•
3(4
.0130
3454
303’
339
flh
IA%
G3
s0,0
0130
50
19
29
30
00
50
4Li
90
93
31
90
35
31
583
13M
35
33
70
0D
M07
010
0503094
El
0908.3
771
3431
1Li
0fl
3733
304
0104
345V
3119
0435
53
15
32
03
70
0.1
01400E
S7
1131
0—
Wil
l30
1908
1fld
110
KW
M1
32410
lid
03
13
’S
4T
h4
15an
3111
3300
.005
3330
34
S3
NO
I
C)C
DJD
-Da
C)
/1 2/
/
33—
3000
3130
1009
111
N. O
il00
1133
2010
3191
AV
G11
3715
3\
•0.
ii
3301
AiD
WD
D).
F’
SiA
flM
LII
I
5’
I—yoaii
s0
-
40
03
3
co0C
oL
-
33.3
144
30C
51Q
0533095
3315
OS
31V
15
440
NW
tfl-
930
33
41
08
14
13
4allO
w®
10
53
50901
7JO
ISM
D30
MD
919
‘0133100
107014
Wi
0513095
£
3014
01
80
19
1134
0E
94
I
023331100
53
95
3313
0110
309
05
00
14
1030
3009
4313
5913
303
09
09
.01
7731
311
*
flS
IC47
0V
I71
3313
035
90aM
4447
037
330400
54305
3193
.00
14
09
44
377
3191
1£
3003
3907
0399
0190
113930199
0150
3094
3
31013192C
C33
3015
73
91
01
34
39
30
0£
901003
3333
0113
54
38
)4C
Thi
£3eC
IIT
hI9
03
309133113321933.3
‘9155153
WA
S3
09504940
W147
321
10
03
84
08
31
04
93
39
33
511
3131
1Q
:53
10
NN
QLL
Ofla
LSN
OO
3573910
a
9145
1930
23
91
05
3034
1933
-
Si
53
---a-
S
-
———
——
——
——
——
——
——
r—
—-
WW
Ifl
99
3.3
_fl
WI
301
33.
19tH
laW
’.
3fl1
05
‘10
311
1AH
_I
1DE
1’H
Dt1
3S3N
01
-“--
N--
:5
033
43‘0
30351
CY
*C
£33
03
.70
0333
05
3135
119
233’.
_i-
__
-.
‘.__
—
IF
:30
3037
915019070
*3013
0133030
3301
3013
1391
3343
003
370
80.3
4OS
£430
011
0041
3394
7038
3733
111
41
57
1)8
13
10
19
01
811
93
1101
939
OSC
l104
Dli
019
91833134194
3150
1913
OS11
333—
0333
32
037
0311
111
0534
7(1
)P
CI
010308383
0190119
OS9
S114
013
9000
co
00D
Mo
ct
IogS
OdX
ti313308
9004
40
3]B
VI
1N3f
l3SV
3
Fm
‘‘-
/
I’
4)
/
1
*
1- —
I :.
u*I
C
Fm
0
P0
‘N
/
ALIT MS
/
H U iG) U)
-- — .- -1-
p-z
I
I--
IIC
33.I
)
C-)
n
r
flU
)
C
///1
//
--2-
/- /
-o- C
!;mt!
oofl
101
LNao
vrav
Iwid
SNI.L
N’vf
ld3&
DS
awr)
Itt
tIIQ
LO
M31
A3N
tfld
3IIS
A.U
DN
1OD
NI1
LO
AP
FLS
S
kilO
N10
0NI1
ON
JM3N
8N
VD
I1]d
3dfl
lD3lI
HD
dV
s3N
or
S3
NO
..
...—
....
..
..
..
—...—
....
...
—...........—
......—
cD
So
DN
v1
Cd
0’;
300
0U
t)C
D]
00
C;
C
JON
ES
JON
ES
ARCH
ITECTURE
.Esit:
Pti’
JN
C$E
5QFU
Trn
SITEPLAN
REViEW
octs
.Et,I
Zr,
LAN
DSCA
PE1RJG
AT1O
NPLA
N,A
DJA
CENT
LOT
LiOl
CC
cc::;
PELICAN
BREWIN
GLINCOLN
CITY
5311H
Yfl
il
J,D
tNO
WR
C C
LINCOLN CITY URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY
-
October 17, 2019 1Mary Jones & Jeff SchonsPelican Brewing CompanyPD Box 189Pacific City, OR 97135
Dear Mary & Jeff:
Pursuant to Lincoln City Municipal Code Title 17, this letter will serve as the Lincoln CityUrban Renewal Agency consent to submit application(s) for Site Plan/Permitting/LandUse with appropriate governing agencies regarding the property that you are interestedin buying a portion of (approximately 2500 sq ft) from the Lincoln City Urban RenewalAgency (Tax lot No: 07-11-34-AD-00300).
Sincerely,
Alison Robertson, DirectorUrban Renewal Agency o
L4
801 SW HIGHWAY 101-SUITE 350 • LINCOLN CITY, OR 97367 • 541.996.1095
0 0JONES ARCHITECTURE
MEMORANDUM
PROJECT PELICAN BREWING (FILE SPR 201 9-06)
SUBJECT COMPLETENESS REVIEW RESPONSE
DATE DECEMBER 3, 2019
RECIPIENTS ANNE MARIE SKINNER, CITY OF LINCOLN CITY
CC MARY JONES, NESTUCCA RIDGE 03
FIRE
1. No revision required
2. Fire hydrant relocated. See C400.
3. Fire hydrant relocated. See C400.
PLANNING
1. See Adjustment Request 01 for Setbacks along Siletz Bay. For side yard setbacks, the adjacent
properties are same Ownership. Notes on Civil Drawings referring to dedications have been
revised.
2. See Adjustment Request 02 for Building Frontage.
3. See Adjustment Request 03 for Ground Story Windows. Sheet LUA200 has been updated to
show ground story window opening percentage.
4. See Adjustment Request 02 for Building Frontage.
5. Roof overhang dimensions added to Sheet LUAO1O.
6. See Adjustment Request 04 for Building Elevation Composition. Sheet LUA200 has been
updated to show elevation plane areas.
7. See Adjustment Request 03 for Ground Story Windows.
8. See Adjustment Request 04 for Building Elevation Composition.
9. Material and color detail notes have been added to Sheet LUA200.
10. Areas of pedestrian shelter added to sheet LUAO1O.
11. Notations regarding mechanical equipment, sizes, screen methods has been added to LUAO1O.
12. Pedestrian spaces, amenities and costs added to LUAGIO.
13. Off-street parking plan for additional property has been updated to show compliance with Chapter
17.56. See LUAO11 and Landscape Plans L100 and Liol.
14. See revised Landscape Plans on Lob and Loll.
15. Site Lighting/Photometric Plan added to set. See Sheet LUA1O1.
120 NW 9Lh Avenue, suae 210. Port[and, Oregon 97209 503 477 9165 www.jonesarccom
C CJONES ARCHITECTURE
MEMORANDUM
RECEIVEDPROJECT PELICAN BREWING (FILE SPR 2019-06)
SUBJECT ADJUSTMENT REQUEST LETTER 4
DATE DECEMBER 3, 2019 PLANNINGRECIPIENTS ANNE MARIE SKINNER, CITY OF LINCOLN CITY
CC MARY JONES! NESTUCCA RIDGE
ADJUSTMENT 01 - SETBACKS
ZONING CODE SECTION: LCMC 17.28050
REQUIRES:The minimum side and rear yard requirements are five feet, with the side and rear yard being increasedby one-half fool for each fool by which the building height exceeds 15 feet.
REASON FOR ADJUSTMENT:Along the west side of the property (rear yard): The purpose of a setback is to provide adequate distancefrom an adjacent property use. In this case, there are no neighboring property uses and therefore anadjustment (reduction) to the rear yard setback will not impact a neighboring property. This adjustment isnecessary to provide enough space for the planned building.Along the north side of the property (side yard): We have an agreement in place to purchase a smallamount of land from the Lincoln City Urban Renewal Agency which will provide the proper amount ofsetback. Please see attached letter from the Urban Renewal Agency for confirmation of this purchase.
ADJUSTMENT 02- BUILDING FRONTAGE
ZONING CODE SECTION: LCMC 17.74.060.B.1.a AND 17.74,080.B.4
REQUIRES:At least 50 percent of the street-facing elevation of new buildings must be within 20 feet of the right-of-way. And, new buildings shall be placed consistent with the performance standards in 17.74.060.
REASON FOR ADJUSTMENT:In order to position the building to provide adequate parking and the best customer experience, the newbuilding has been planned to be constructed as far north as possible. This will provide better views fromthe dining room and the least amount of wind for the outdoor dining. Additionally, the Southern portion ofthe property is the widest section of land and therefore provides a more efficient parking layout andlandscape design. And, this location for the parking lot allows for exiting cars to have two choices forgetting onto Hy 101: 1) right turn only onto Hwy 101 for southbound motorists, and 2) left onto Jelly Rd,which will provide for safer access at an intersection onto Hwy 101 for northbound motorists. This willprevent a back-up in the parking area due to difficulty exiting out of the parking lot to the north.Finally, the Southern portion of the properties is not conducive to building because it is in the floodplain,and a majority of the Southern property falls within a utility easement from the Jetty Rd realignment.
120 NW 9” Avenue. Suite 210, Portland, Oregon 97209 503 477 9165 www.jonesarc.com
C 0JONES ARCHITECTURE
ADJUSTMENT 03- WINDOWS AT GROUND FLOOR
ZONING CODE SECTION: LCMC 17.74.080.B.3.b AND 17.74.080.B.10
REQUIRES:Buildings shall have large display windows, windowed doors, and transom windows. In the pearls thisstandard is met when the ground floor, street-facing elevation of a building between the building base (or30 inches above the sidewalk grade, whichever is less) and a plane 80 inches above the sidewalk gradeis comprised of at least 60 percent transparent windows. And, there are requirements for openings.
REASON FOR ADJUSTMENT:In this case, the customer experience is extremely important to the success of the planned restaurant onthis propefly. The bay views to the west are most desirable for the dining experience and therefore muchof the glass windows are oriented to the west along the bay. The Highway 101 views to the east (at theroad frontage) are the least desirable for dining guests and therefore the kitchen and loading dockspaces are placed on that side of the building, with the exception of the brewery, which is along the roadfrontage and the bulk of that area is glass, oriented to the road frontage; however, this area is not enoughto meet the 60% standard. We propose providing interesting sculptural elements in front of the buildingon the road frontage at kitchen and loading dock portions of the building instead of glass, which willprovide beautiful art for passing motorists.
In addition, the standard as written would be very difficult to achieve given the current energy codes.
ADJUSTMENT 04- BUILDING ELEVATION COMPOSITION
ZONING CODE SECTION: LCMC 17.74.080.B.8.a AND 17.74.080.B.11 and 12
REQUIRES:Building elevations shall incorporate offsets or divisions with distinct planes of not more than 800 squarefeet. And, there are requirements for horizontal rhythms and vertical lines.
REASON FOR ADJUSTMENT:The planned architectural style of the building is predicated on simple dramatic rectangular forms. Thisstyle is contrary to incorporating articulation in the exterior walls when not needed. However, weunderstand the desire to prevent long uninterrupted stretches of siding and we ar mitted to providingan interesting road frontage by using landscaping and ad.
We intend to create interest with creative sculptural elements as described in ason nand hope to commission local coastal artisans to provide an interesting street ape.
We believe this will achieve the objective and intent of the code. /Os;
ft1Ni
120 NW 9°’ Avenue. Suite 210, Portland, Oregon 97209 503 477 9155 www.jonesarc.com
LLt
NAME OF APPLICANT:
MAILING AppRESS: Vo. 1’,c (&f
0Th iCc
DAYtIME PHONE: 9i-3 \ $EMAIL (OPTIONAL):
1
— ATE:
_________ ____________
Signature:
— STATE:
_________
Signature:
APPLICANT AND/OR OWNER’S INTEREST IN PROPERTY SUBJECT TO REQUEST:
E AGENT, FEE OWNER,
PROJECT LOCATION: —
PROJECT ADDRESS: —
)CONTRACF PURCHASER,
5-cc 6A-n?/An9
ASSESSOR’S MAP NO.:
AREA: (acres) SQ. Fr.:
TAX LOT(S):
ZONING:
Land Use App REV 022009 Planning and Community Development, 801 SW Highway 101, P0 Box 50, UncoIn City, OR 97367Tel: 541-996-2153 Fax 541-996-1284
C) c:OFFICE USE 0 LY OFFICE USE ONLYDate flied:Amount/Fee:
CLty of 4 cmn flat Rreived
LtncoLvvCLtyRECEIVEDReCeipt No:
ReCeived By:
LAND USE NuV 1 4 201930 Days:Deemed InCompleteDeemed Complete120 Day
Deadline:: APPLICATIONfiIePJ_ANNING
APPLICATION TYPE
fl ANNEXATION LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT SITE PLAN REVIEW
flAPPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION
E MINOR PARTm0N SUBDIVISIONDECISION
E APPEAL OF PLANNING DEPARTMENT NATURAL RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARYDECISION REVIEW AMENDMENT
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN & ZONINGD
NATURAL RESOURCE DEVELOPMENTfl VACATION
: MAP AMENDMENT VARIANCE
I COMPREHENSIVE PLAN &/OR ZONING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTVARIANCEORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT PRELIMINARY MASTER PLAN
CONDITIONAL USE PERMITPLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FINAL
OTHER____________________
C.Z)
V\sc V ftcc_&ot.
JOWNER OF RECORD (if oth r than applicant)
NAME: Hr fir
MAIUNGAPDRESS:J .vo 437Q IkI
CITY:
_________
DAME PHONE:
EMAIL (OPTIONAL) p.,. }‘, C_
a J
OPTION HOLDER, H LESSEE, H OTHER
— -n
N
S.
i $OREF
____________________
RM Z.• Ut
I Bath Buyer and Seller acknowledge having received the Oregon Real Estate Agency Disclosure Pamphlet, and hereby acknowledge and consent2 to the following agency relationships in this transaction; Maw J Jones3
_________________________________________________________
(Name of Buyer’s Agent(s)’), Oregon Lic. # 9203002154 of Shoreplne Properties, Inc. (Name of Real Estate Firm(s)’)5 Buyer’s Agents Office Address 5975 Shorepine Drive, Pacific City, OR 97135 , Company Lic. # 2012211956 Phone#1 (503)550-7194 Phone#2
______________________
E-mail maryshorepineproperties.com7 is/are the agent of (check one); Buyer exclusively (“Buyer Agency”). E Both Buyer and Seller (‘Disclosed Limited Agency”).B Seller representing self (Name of Seller’s Agent(s)’), Oregon Lic. #
________________________
9 of (Name of Real Estate Firm(s)”)10 Sellers Agents Office Address
______________________________________________________________
Company Lic. #
______________________
II Phone#1
____________________
Phone#2
____________________
_______________________________________________
12 isiare the agent of (check one); Seller exclusively (‘seller Agency”). Both Buyer and Seller (‘Disclosed Limited Agency”).13 *If Buyer’s andlor Seller’s Agents andlor Firms are co-selling or co-listing In this transaction, all Agent and Firm names should be14 dIsclosed above.
15 Ii both parties are each represented by one or more Agents in the same Real Estate Firm, and Agents are supervised by the same principal broker16 in that Real Estate Firm. Buyer and Seller acknowledge that said principal broker shall become the disclosed limited agent for both Buyer and17 Seller as more fully explained In the Disclosed Limited Agency Agreements that have been reviewed and signed by Buyer, Seller and Agent(s).
18 Buyer shall sign this acknowledgment at the time of signing this Agreement before submission to Seller. Seller shall sign this acknowledgment at the time this19 Agreement is first submitted to Seller, even if this Agreement will be rejected or a counter offer wilt be made. Seller’s signature to this Final Agency20 Acknowledgment shall not constitute acceptance of this Agreement or any terms therein.
21 Buyer Vvt__2<’S)T Print Mary J Jones, President Date({._ 2_f9
.
22 Buyer
___________________________________________
_____________________________________
Date
___________________
23 Seller
________________________________________
Date ,—/ - €24 Seller
___________________________
Print John M. Kaines. Trustee Date ‘C’5/J”, ç €/ I’ 7
(C
FINAL AGENCY ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Sale Agreement # 04242019MJJ I
7)( it_v
Describe the project including the type of use, number of dwellings, square footage ofexisting and proposed buildings, etc. Attach sheets if necessary.SEE ATTACHED PROJECT DESCRIPTION
APPLICANT’S VERIFICATION
I (We) hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Oregonthat the information in this application and its attachments is true, complete, and correct.
I(- fLJ,-j
Date
• / N,
// ‘ C C
SITE PLAN REVIEWEVIDENCE TO SUPPORT OF FINDINGS OF FACT
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
SIGNATURES
Property Owner
Date
I — HS—Date
SPR_REV 05280g
C) CJONES ARCHITECTURE
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT PELICAN BREWING AT SILETZ BAY, LINCOLN CITY
A NEW 13,000 SF BREW PUB FOR PELICAN BREWING COMPANY, INCLUDING RESTAURANT,RESTAURANT KITCHEN AND SUPPORT SPACES, BREWERY, OFFICES AND OUTDOOR PATIOSAND BOARDWALK.
THE BUILDING WILL BE A LARGE SINGLE-STORY STRUCTURE WITH A PAIR OF LONG SHEDROOFS THAT HOUSE A PARTIAL SECOND STORY. THE BUILDING WILL HAVE A HEAVY TIMBERWOOD STRUCTURE THAT IS EXPOSED TO VIEW IN THE DINING AREAS AND AT THE LARGEROOF OVERHANGS.
SITE IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE A PAVED PARKING AREA WITH LANDSCAPING, A PAVEDPEDESTRIAN AREA, A BOARDWALK AND A LARGE PATIO. A PIER AND BOARDWALKCONNECTIONS ARE ENVISIONED AS FUTURE PROJECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THISDEVELOPMENT.
JONES ARCHITECTURE WORKED ON THIS PROJECT IN COLLABORATION WITH EDG INTERIORARCHITECTS, JBK KITCHEN DESIGN AND THE PELICAN BREWING TEAM.
120 NW gth Avenue, Suite 210, Portland, Oregon 97209 503 477 9165 www.jonesarc.com
Prepared For:Pelican Brewing, Co.5911 SW HWY 101Lincoln City, OR 97367
* Ii
Prepared By:Harper Houf Peterson Righellis Inc.205 SE Spokane Street. Suite 200Portland, OR 97202P:503-221-1131 F:503-221-1171
I NUVJ420J
PLANNING
HarperHouf PetersonRighellis Inc.
PelicBn Brewery Lincoln CityNES-13
Stormwater Management Report
October 2019 ii
Dan Loss, PE
UHPRENGINEERS PLANNERS
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS • SURVEYORS
0 C)Pelican Brewing Lincoln City
Stormwater Management ReportOctober 2019
Table of Contents
Introduction 3Project Description 3Existing Site Conditions 3Methodology 3Soils Characteristics 4Proposed Improvements 4Stormwater Quality Treatment 4Table I — Water Quality Treatment Requirements 5Water Quantity 5Conveyance 5Downstream Analysis 5Conclusion 5
Appendices Index
Appendix A — MapsExisting Basin MapProposed Basin Map
Appendix B — Soil and Basin DataSoil SurveyTR-55 Runoff Curve NumbersGeotechnical Report by Geotech Solutions, Inc.
Appendix C — Water Quality I Water QuantityStormwater Mechanical Treatment DetailsProprietary Water Quality CalculalionsWater Quality Hydrograph Summary and Reports
Appendix D — Conveyance CalculationsPipe Conveyance Calculations
2
0 CPelican Brewing Lincoln City
Stormwater Management ReportOctober 2019
Soils Characteristics
The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) with the United States Department ofAgriculture (USDA) has classified the soils within Lincoln County in the Web Soil Survey. Soilsare categorized into Hydrologic Soil Group based on estimated runoff from precipitation. Thesegroupings assume the soils are saturated and receive precipitation from long-duration storms.This rainfall to runoff relationship is complex and includes drainage and permeabilitycharacteristics of the soil. The soils for the site are fine sand and have hydrologic soil groupclassifications shown in Appendix B. Based on the soils investigation in the geotechnical report,on-site infiltration is not suitable for the project due to the high water table.
Existing (E) and Proposed (P) Soil Assumptions:
Curve Numbers = (E&P) 98 for Impervious Areas(E&P) 80 for Landscape Areas (Soil Type D)
Sheet Flow Mannings “n’ = 0.011 for pavement0.150 for short prairie grass and lawn
Shallow Concentrated Flow “Cfr’ = 16.135 for unpaved surfaces20.32 for paved surfaces
Proposed Improvements
Proposed onsite surface area will consist of parking lots, hardscape, landscape and buildings.The City requires stormwater management for the improved site area and any contributing arearunoff. Refer to Appendix A for the proposed impervious area exhibit and basin delineation.
Pollutants of concern related to commercial development include sediment, nutrients, pesticides,herbicides, fungicides, metals (zinc, copper, lead, etc.), oil, grease, and other petroleum.
Stormwater Quality Treatment
The City of Lincoln City treatment criteria will be met by treatment of the site runoff throughproposed mechanical treatment devices due to the shallow existing outfalls proposed to be reused as well as the limited landscape areas in the surface parking lot. As discussed with theLincoln City Public Works Department, stormwater treatment is not required for roof runoff.Stormwater treatment will be provided for the proposed parking lot impervious areas.
Proposed peak treatment flows for each drainage basin were calculated using the HydraflowHydrograph Program’s Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph (SBUH) method. The City of LincolnCity requires treatment of peak flow from the % of the 2-year, 24-hour design storm event.
Due to invert constraints in order to re-use the existing outfall pipes into Siletz Bay, it was foundthat proprietary treatment catch basins were the best option for treatment for the site. The belowtable shows a summary of treatment flows each proposed treatment catch basin canaccommodate. In addition, refer to Appendix C for additional water quality calculations.
4
C CPelican Brewery Lincoln City
Stormwater Management ReportOctober2019
APPENDIX A - MAPS
e
CPelican Brewery Lincoln City
Stormwater Managenient ReportOctober 2019
APPENDIX B — SOILS AND BASIN DATA
e
Hyd
rolo
gic
Sai
lG
roup
—L
inco
lnC
ount
yA
rea,
Ore
gon
MA
PL
EG
EN
DM
AP
INFO
RM
AT
ION
Are
aof
Inte
rest
(AO
l)C
The
soil
surv
eys
that
com
pris
eyo
urA
Ol
wer
em
appe
dat
Are
aof
Inte
rest
(AO
l)ci
t1:
20,0
00.
Soi
lso
War
ning
:So
ilM
apm
ayno
tbe
valid
atth
issc
ale.
Soil
Rat
ing
Pol
ygon
s
QN
otra
ted
orno
tav
aila
ble
Enl
arge
men
tof
map
sbe
yond
the
scal
eof
map
ping
can
cau
sem
isun
ders
tand
ing
ofth
ede
tail
ofm
appi
ngan
dac
cura
cyof
soil
ND
Wat
erF
eatu
res
line
plac
emen
t.T
hem
aps
dono
tsh
owth
esm
all
area
sof
Stre
ams
and
Can
als
cont
rast
ing
soil
sth
aico
uld
have
bee
nsh
own
ata
mor
ede
tail
edE
lB
scal
e.T
rans
port
atio
nE
l.
-
——
Rai
lsP
leas
ere
lyon
the
bar
scal
eon
each
map
shee
tfo
rm
ap
Inte
rsta
teH
ighw
ays
mea
sure
men
ts.
doU
SR
oute
sS
ourc
eof
Map
:N
atur
alR
esourc
esC
onse
rvat
ion
Ser
vice
0W
ebSo
ilS
urve
yU
RL
:M
aior
Roa
dsC
oord
inat
eS
yste
m:
Web
Mer
cato
r(E
PS
G:3
857)
Not
rate
dor
not
avai
labl
eL
ocal
Roa
dsM
aps
from
the
Web
Soil
Sur
vey
are
bas
edon
the
Web
Mer
cato
rSo
ilR
atin
gL
ines
Bac
kro
und
proj
ecti
on,
whi
chpre
serv
esdi
rect
ion
and
shap
ebu
tdi
stor
ts.e
Ag
dis
tan
cean
dar
ea.
Apr
ojec
tion
that
pre
serv
esar
ea,
such
asth
eA
enal
Pho
togr
aphy
Alb
ers
equal
-are
aco
nic
proj
ecti
on,
shou
ldbe
use
dif
mor
eN
Dac
cura
teca
lcul
atio
nsof
dis
tance
orar
eaar
ere
quir
ed.
—‘
BT
his
prod
uct
isgen
erat
edfr
omth
eU
SD
A-N
RC
Sce
rtif
ied
data
asof
the
vers
ion
dat
e(s)
list
edbe
low
.BI
D
cSo
ilS
urve
yA
rea:
Lin
coln
Cou
nty
Are
a,O
rego
nA
-,
Sur
vey
Are
aD
ata:
Ver
sion
16,
Sep
10.
2019
A-—
Soil
map
unit
sar
ela
bele
d(a
ssp
ace
allo
ws)
for
map
scal
es0
1:50
.000
orla
rger
Not
rate
dor
not
avai
labl
eD
ate(
s)ae
rial
imag
esw
reph
otog
raph
ed:
Dec
31
.20
09—
Feb
12.
2017
Sai
lR
atin
gP
oint
s
•A
The
orih
opho
toor
olhe
rbas
em
apon
whi
chth
eso
illi
nes
wer
eco
mpi
led
and
digi
tize
dpr
obab
lydi
ffer
sfr
omth
eba
ckgr
ound
•N
Dim
ager
ydi
spla
yed
onth
ese
map
s.A
sa
resu
lt,
som
em
inor
•B
shif
ting
ofm
apun
itboundar
ies
may
beev
iden
t.
•B
ID
USD
AN
atur
alR
esourc
esW
ebSo
ilS
urve
y10
/241
2019
Conse
rvat
ion
Ser
vic
eN
atio
nal
Coo
pera
tive
Soil
Sur
vey
Pag
e2
o14
C CHydrologic Soil Group—Lincoln County Area. Oregon
Component Percent Cutoff None Specified
Tie-break Rule: Higher
USDA Natural Rosources Web Sail Survey 1012412019Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 4
C C
Pelican Brewpub5911 Highway 101
Lincoln City, Oregon
flATFnC
July 2,2019
GSI Project pelican- 19-I -gi
C C)July 2. 2019 pelican-I 9-I-gi
Provide recommendations for floor slab support, retaining walls, and thicknesses for base rock andasphalt concrete pavements.Provide a written report summarizing the results of our geotechnical evaluation.
SITE OBSERVATIONS AND CONDITIONSSurface ConditionsThe site is located at 5911 Highway 101 in south Lincoln City, Oregon at the site of the existing BayHouse restaurant in the Cutler City area. The site includes an existing low rise restaurant building inthe north, with associated paving for a drive and parking extending to the south, all of it Bayfront. TheBayfront slope is roughly 6 feet high inclined at roughly 1.5-2K: IV, and armored with 2-3 foot boulderrip-rap near the building and large concrete block near the parking. 2018 surfüe features can be seenon the attached Site Plan.
The site is occupied by a single story restaurant structure and related pavements and utilities that areplanned to be demolished. The base of the existing structure appears to be near grade. with parkingelevated above the ground to the east. Pavement with fatigued areas is present in the central drive anddelivery areas, with little fatigue in the southern parking areas.
Subsurface ConditionsThe site was explored on June 27, 2019 with 4 mud rotary drilled borings. The approximate locationsof our explorations are shown on the attached Site Plan. According to geologic maps of the area thesite is underlain by alluvial deposits abutting marine siltstone to the east of Highway 101. Soil conditionsencountered are generally consistent with this mapping and also include a cap of generally sand andgravel fill.
Thin pavement asphalt concrete and base rock sections in the borings were underlain by 5- I 0 feet ofgravel and sand fill, silty in some areas, which was generally medium dense with a few loose zones.Blowcounts (N85) in the fill generally ranged from 5 to 29. Moisture contents were 18-51%, higherwhere silt content was high or trace organics or clay was present
Under the fill in B-I and B-2 we encountered generally medium dense poorly graded fine sand with tracefines (to clean) and with a variable low content of small subangular gravels. Blow counts in the sandwere from 5 to 22 and averaged about 13. Moisture contents generally ranged from 23-30%, with a fewhigh exceptions were organic fragments were present.
The sand was underlain at a depth of 27 feet in B-2 (nearer the bay) by silt with gravel sized weatheredclasts inferred as derived from intacUin place siltstone based on the unweathered fractures and hardconsistency at depth (It is possible the lower siltstone was a large colluvial block). In B-I weencountered colluvial silt below the sand, also derived from siltstone, but underlain by alluvial silty sandand sandy silt with trace organics and discernible bedding. This silt may be pan of an old slide deposit.now buried.
Sand Fill - This unit was 3 to 4 feet thick under site pavements in B-I, and not present in P-I, and wasgenerally medium dense.. Moisture content was 18% for one sample tested.
2181112 7th Street Oregon City, OR 97045 p 503.657.3487 f503.722.9946
C CJufr 2,2019 pelican-I 9-l-gi
greater than 4 feet We recommend that the type and design of the shoring system be the responsibility ofthe contractor, who is in the best position to choose a system that fits the overall plan of operation.
Pipe bedding should be installed in accordance with the pipe manufacturers recommendations. Ifgroundwater seepage is present in the base of the utility trench excavation, we recommend over-excavatingthe trench by 12 to IS inches and placing trench stabilization material in the base. Trench stabilization materialshould consist of well-graded, crushed rock or crushed gravel with a maximum particle size of 4 inches and befree of deleterious materials. The percent passing the U.S. Standard #200 Sieve shall be less than 5 percent byweight when tested in accordance with ASTM C 117.
Trench backfill above the pipe zone should consist of well graded, angular crushed rock or sand fill withno more than 7 percent passing a #200 sieve. Trench backfill should be compacted to 92 percentrelative to ASTM D 1557, and construction of hard surfaces, such as sidewalks or pavement, should notoccur within one week of backfilling.
Slopes - Temporary slopes may be inclined up to l.25K:lV for slopes up to 8 feet high. Such slopesshould be expected to erode somewhat depending on weather conditions and duration of exposure.Permanent slopes should be inclined no steeper than 1.5K: IV for slopes up to 6 feet high, and 2H: IVabove that Erosion control is critical to maintaining slopes, and we recommend the existing shorefrontprotection remain in place or be matched with new material of similar size and angularity as it isproviding suitable shoreline protection. Drainage must be routed away from slope faces.
Infiltration - Infiltration is not recommended due to shallow ground water and exacerbatingliquefaction and shorefront slope concerns.
Helical Pier and Grade Beam FoundationsGeneral - Due to the presence of a liquefiable upper sand unit, foundations must be supported on piersembedded into soils below those sands. Liquefaction induced settlement is estimated at 4-5 inches, withlateral spreading of several inches toward the Siletz River channel on the west side of the bay. Based onour explorations, soils not susceptible to significant liquefaction deformations and suitable to achievefoundation support capacity are roughly 25 to 35 feet below the surface. This depth may be differentunder the existing building footprint to the north of our accessible borings, perhaps shallower based onadjacent topography and siltstone expression across the highway. Capacities listed herein may be limitedby the structural capacity of the pier and must be evaluated by a structural engineer. Piers must be spaceda minimum of 3 pier diameters apart Closer spacing will result in a reduction in pier capacity resultingfrom group effects and we must be consulted.
Continuous grade beams with embedded fixed head pier support can be used with a crawl space or beintegral with a reinforced slab. If the slab is to be sacrificial and support only floor loads, it does not needto be designed to structurally span between grade beams. For support of equipment or heavier storageareas such as coolers or freezers, a structural floor designed to free span to grade beams is recommended.
Helical Piers
Feasibility of installation of helical piers to suitable depths must be proven with use of indicator piersprior to construction. If penetration is feasible, helical piers can be used to support vertical loads, andinclined piers can be used to provide lateral resistance. Piers are generally installed in 5 to 7-foot long
4/81112 7’ Street, Oregon City, OR 97045 p 503.657.3487 f503.722.9946
0 0July 2,2019 pelican-I 9-I-gi
Ground Moisture
General - The perimeter ground surface and hard-scaping should be sloped to drain away from allstructures. Gutters must be tight-lined to a suitable discharge and maintained as free-flowing. All crawlspaces must be adequately ventilated. Due to shallow groundwater anticipated at the site, basementsare not allowed.
Perimeter Foundation Drains - We recommend installing perimeter foundation drains around allexterior foundations to reduce crawl space infiltration and/or underslab moisture. The foundationdrains should consist of a two-foot wide zone of drain rock encompassing a 4-inch diameter perforatedpipe, all enclosed with a non-woven filter fabric, The drain rock should have no more than 2 percentpassing a #200 sieve and should extend to within one foot of the ground surface. The geosyntheticshould be a Propex Geotex 601 or equivalent. One foot of low permeability soil (such as the on-sitesilt) should be placed over the fabric at the top of the drain to isolate the drain from surface runoff.Foundation drains must be routed to a suitable discharge.
Seismic Design
General - In accordance with the International Building Code (IBC) 2003 as adopted by SOSSC, thesubject project soils are site class F, but Site Class D can be used for design of the planned structure.
The preceding recommendations follow code criterion. However, design level recurrence of amplifiedpeak horizontal ground accelerations from the relatively near field Cascadia Subduction Zone (CSZ)interface earthquakes is expected to be at least O.5g for repeated cycles. Because of this and severalminutes of expected strong ground motions, the owner may want the structural engineer to considerdesigning to a higher performance level to reduce building damage and improve egress during such anevent There is roughly a 30 percent chance of a CSZ interface earthquake occurring in the next 50years, although the recurrence is episodic and could occur at any time.
Liquefaction - Liquefaction occurs in saturated, low cohesion soils. Strong shaking, such as thatexperienced during earthquakes, causes the densification and the subsequent settlement of these soils.We completed detailed liquefaction analyses of the site soils. An estimated 4-5 inches of verticalsettlement from densification of the underlying sand is expected. Lateral spreading of several inches toover a foot is also expected toward the Sileta River channel west in the bay. This may lead to groundcracks, surface damage, and sand venting.
Tsunami - Tsunami hazard (DOGAMI OFR 0-95-IS, TIM-Linc-02) maps indicate that the entire site willlikely be inundated during a design level CSZ earthquake, and the frontage may be impacted by a largedistant earthquake as well. Evacuation plans must be implemented by the owners and occupants.Structural damage is expected from tsunami impacts, and re-occupancy is an unrealistic goal unlessspecifically designed for by the structural engineer. It should be noted that in either case liquefactiondeformations will impact the site.
Coseismic Subsidence - The existing ground surface may drop several feet in elevation after a designlevel earthquake. This may impact flood elevations and further inundation.
6/81112 7th Street, Oregon City. OR 97045 p 503.657.3487 “503.722.9946
C
We appreciate the opportunity to work with you on this project and look forward to our continuedinvolvement. Please contact us if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Don Rondema, MS. PE, GEPrincipal
ii’
CJuly 2,2019 pelican-I 9-i-gi
Attachments:
Site Plan, Soil Classification, Boring Logs, Moisture Contents
8181112 7th Street Oregon City, OR 97045 p503.657.3487 f 503.722.9946
C C)
GUIDELINES FOR CLASSIFICATION OF SOIL
Description of Relative Density for Granular Soil
Standard Penetration Resistance(N-values) blows per foot
Relative Density
very loose
loose
medium dense
dense
very dense
0-4
4- 10
0-30
30 - 50
over 50
Description of Consistency for Fine-Grained (Cohesive) Soils
Standard Penetration TorvaneConsistency Resistance (N-values) Undrained Shear
blows per foot Strength, tsf
very soft 0-2 less than 0.125soft 2-4 0.125 -0.25
medium stiff 4 - 8 0.25 - 0.50stiff 8-IS 0.50- 1,0
very stiff 15-30 1.0- 2.0hard over 30 over 2.0
Grain-Size Classification
Description Size
Boulders 2-36 in.Cobbles 3 - I 2 in.
Gravel ¼ - V4 in. (fine)
‘/ -3 in. (coarse)
Sand No. 200 - No. 40 Sieve (fine)
No.40 - No. 10 sieve (medium)
No, 10- No.4 sieve (coarse)Silt/Clay Pass No. 200 sieve
Modifier for Subclassification
.. Percentage of Other
AdjectiveMaterial In Total Sample
Clean/Occasional 0 - 2
Trace 2- 10
Some 10-30
Sandy, Silty, Clayey, etc. 30 - 50
C C
Samples and Data
2.5” asphalt concrete over 4 inches crushed rock with some silt.
Loose, gray and brown, poorly graded fine SAND FILL with some silt andgravel; moist,
Medium dense, gray, poorly graded fine SAND; with trace gravel and tracesilt to clean; wet.
Stiff, dark gray (with orange joint staining), SILT I gravel sized clasts ofseverely weathered highly fractured siltstone; wet.
becomes very stiff, less fractured, more intact
39 ft becomes hard, moderately weathered SILTSTONE (noorange joint staining).
Mud rotary boring completed at a depth of 41.5 feet on June 27. 2019 andbentonite grouted then gravel and cold patched AC surface.
w = moisture contentN = SPT blowcount* = No recovery
HNR
Soil and Rock Description
becomes SANDY SILT FILL
2
‘I:41. ILj
_?.Th%t.
•
w = 22%
LI
El
LI
El
becomes loose, fine to medium.
becomes medium dense, fine, with some small gravels
occasional gravels
30—
40j
j
El
El
w = 2B%
w21%
w 19%
Beotech BORING B-2Solutions IntL Pelican-l9-l-gi
Mud rotary boring completed at a depth of 9 feet on June 27, 2019 andbentonite grouted then gravel and cold patched AC surface.
C C
Soil and Rock Descriotion
2.5’ asphalt concrete over 4 inches crushed rock with some silt.
Samples and Data
C.tS31
•.
Medium dense, gray and brown, gravelly SAND FILL with trace to some silcmoist
w = moisture content= SPT blowcount
= No recovery
becomes loose to very loose, occasional gravel
becomes silty
w = 24%
NR
w41%
BORING B-4SOlUTIOnS Intl Pelican-l9-l-gi
C CPelican Brewery Lincoln City
Stormwater Management ReportOctober 2019
APPENDIX C - WATER QUALITY
e
C
Lincoln City PrewbubWater Quality CalculationsPrepared by Harper Hout Peterson Righellis Inc.Job No. NES-13October 2019
Basin 2U
018
StormFilter Cartridges Required
Water Quality Flaw x (449 gpm/cfs) / (IS gpm/cartridge)
0.18 cfs x 49/15 = 5.39 cartridges
Use 6 cartridges
C C
Lincoln City PrewbubWater Quality CalculationsPrepared by Harper Houf Peterson Righellis IncJob No. NES-l3October 2019
Basin 4Q
0.02
StormFilter Cartridges RequiredWater Quality Flow x (449 gpm/cfs) / (15 gpm/cartridge)
0.02 Icfs x 449/15= 0.60 cartridges
Use 1 cartrIdges
CHydrograph Summary
CReportHydragow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020
Hyd. Hydrograph Peak Time Time to Hyd. Inflow Maximum Total HydrographNo. type flow interval Peak volume hyd(s) elevation strge used Description
(origin) (cft) (mm) (mm) (cuft) (ft) (cuff)
2
3
4
5
SBUH Runoff
SBUH Runoff
SBUH Runoff
SBUH Runoff
SBUH Runoff
0316
0366
0069
004o
009g
2
2
2
2
2
474
474
474
474
474
4,605
5,325
1,007
576
1.4 39
Basin #1
Basin #2
Basin #3
Basin #4
Basin NODOT ROW
NESI3_Hydraflow.gpw Return Period: 2 Year Friday, 10/25/2019
C CHydrograph Report
3
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Aulodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020
Hyd. No. 2Basin #2
Friday, 10/25/2019
Hydrograph typeStorm frequencyTime intervalDrainage areaBasin SlopeTc methodTotal precip.Storm duration
Q (c(s)
0.50
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
= SBUH Runoff= 2 yrs= 2 mm= 0.370 ac= 0.0 %= User= 4.20 in= 24 hrs
Basin #2
Peak dischargeTime to peakHyd. volumeCurve numberHydraulic lengthTime of conc. (Tc)DistributionShape factor
= 0.366 cfs= 7.90 hrs= 5,325 cuft= 98= 0 ft= 5.00 mm= Type IA= n/a
Q (c(s)
0.50
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
Hyd. No. 2—2 Year
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26
Hyd No. 2Time (hrs)
Hydrograph ReportC 5
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020
Hyd. No. 4
Basin #4
Friday, 10/25 /2019
Hydrograph typeStorm frequencyTime intervalDrainage areaBasin SlopeTc methodTotal precip.Storm duration
Q (cfs)
0.10
0.09
0.08
0.07
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.00
= SBUH Runoff= 2 yrs= 2 mm= 0.040 ac= 0.0 %= User= 4.20 in= 24 hrs
Basin #4
Peak dischargeTime to peakHyd. volumeCurve numberHydraulic lengthTime of conc. (Tc)DistributionShape factor
= 0.040 cfs= 7.90 hrs= 576 cuft= 98= 0 ft= 5.00 mm= Type IA= n/a
Q (cfs)
0.10
0.09
0.08
0.07
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.00
Hyd. No.4-- 2 Year
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26
Hyd No. 4Time (hrs)
(7
H yd rograph S u IT! rn a ry Repo rtlydraflQw Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc.
Hyd. Hydrograph Peak Time Time to Hyd. Inflow Maximum Total HydrographNo. type flaw interval Peak volume hyd(s) elevation strge used Description
(origin) (oft) (mm) (mm) (tuft) (ft) (cuft)
1 SBUH Runoff 0153 2 474 2,176 Basin #1
2 SBUH Runoff 0 177 2 474 2,516 Basin #2
3 SBUH Runoff 0033 2 474 476 Basin #3
4 SBUH Runoff 0019 2 474 272 Basin #4
5 SBUH Runoff 0.048 2 474 680 Basin NODOT ROW
NES13_Hydraflow.gpw Return Period: 3 Year Friday, 10 / 25/ 2019
C- Hydrograph Report
9
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020
Hyd. No. 2
Basin #2
Friday, 10/25/2019
Hydrograph typeStorm frequencyTime intervalDrainage areaBasin SlopeTc methodTotal precip.Storm duration
Q (cfs)
0.50
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
= SBUH Runoff= 3 yrs= 2 mm= 0.370ac= 0.0%= User= 2.10 in= 24 hrs
Basin #2
Peak dischargeTime to peakHyd. volumeCurve numberHydraulic lengthTime of conc. (Tc)DistributionShape factor
= 0.l77cfs= 7.90 hrs= 2516 cuft= 98= oft= 5.00 mm= Type IA= n/a
Q (cfs)
0.50
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
Hyd. No.2-- 3 Year
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26
Hyd No. 2Time (hrs)
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020
Hyd. No. 4Basin #4
C
Friday, 1012512019
Hydragraph typeStorm frequencyTime intervalDrainage areaBasin SlopeTo methodTotal precip.Storm duration
Q (ofs)
0.10
0.09
0.08
0.07
006
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.00
= SBUH Runoff= 3 yrs= 2 mm= 0.O4Oac= 0.0 %= User= 2.10 in= 24 hrs
Basin #4
Peak dischargeTime to peakHyd. volumeCurve numberHydraulic lengthTime of conc. (To)DistributionShape factor
= 0.Ol9cfs= 7.90 hrs= 272 cult= 98= 0 ft= 5.00 mm= Type IA= n/a
o (cfs)
0.10
0.09
0.08
0.07
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.00
CHydrograph Report
11
Hyd. No.4—3 Year
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26
Hyd No. 4Time (his)
C C) 13
H yd rog rap h S u i’ii ni a iy Repo‘Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020
Hyd. Hydrograph Peak Time Time to Hyd. Inflow Maximum Total HydrographNo. type flow interval Peak volume hyd(s) elevation strge used Description
(origin) (cfs) (mm) (mm) (cuff) (if) (cuff)
1 SBUH Runoff 0.432 2 474 6.345 Basin #1
2 SBUH Runoff 0.499 2 474 7,336 Basin #2
3 SBUH Runoff 0.094 2 474 1,388 Basin #3
4 SBUH Runoff 0.054 2 474 793 Basin #4
5 SBUH Runoff 0135 2 474 1,983 Basin N000T ROW
NES13_Hydraflow.gpw Return Period: 10 Year Friday, 10 / 25/ 2019
ci CHydrograph Report
15
HydraflowHydrugraphs Extension for Aulodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 byAutodesk, Inc. v2020
Hyd. No. 2
Basin #2
Friday, 10/25/2019
Hydrograph typeStorm frequencyTime intervalDrainage areaBasin SlopeTc methodTotal precip.Storm duration
Q (cfs)
0.50
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
= SBUH Runoff= lOyrs= 2 mm= 0.370ac= 0.0%= User= 5.70 in= 24hrs
Basin #2
Peak dischargeTime to peakHyd. volumeCurve numberHydraulic lengthTime of cone. (Tc)DistributionShape factor
= 0.499 cfs= 7.90 hrs= 7,336 cuft= 98= oft= 5.00 mm= Type IA= n/a
Q (cfs)
0.50
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
Hyd. No. 2—10 Year
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26
Hyd No. 2Time (hrs)
Hydrograph ReportCi C 17
Hydraflaw Hydrographs Exlension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk, Inc v2020
Hyd. No. 4
Basin #4
Friday, 10/25/2019
Hydrograph typeStorm frequencyTime intervalDrainage areaBasin SlopeTc methodTotal precip.Storm duration
Q (cfs)
0.10
0.09
0.08
0.07
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.00
= SBUH Runoff= lOyrs= 2 mm= 0.O4Oac= 0.0%= User= 5.70 in= 24 hrs
Basin #4
Peak dischargeTime to peakHyd. volumeCurve numberHydraulic lengthTime of conc. (Tc)DistributionShape factor
= 0.054 cfs= 7.90 hrs= 793 cuft= 98= 0 ft= 5.00 mm= Type IA= n/a
Q (cfs)
0.10
0.09
0.08
0.07
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.00
Hyd. No. 4-- 10 Year
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 16 20 22 24 26
Hyd No. 4Time (hrs)
0 0 19
“ Hyd rog rap h S u ni mary Repo rtrYdfaflOW Hydrographs Extension for Aulodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Aulodesk. Inc. v2020
Hyd. Hydrograph Peak Time lime to Hyd. Inflow Maximum Total HydrographNo. type flow interval Peak volume hyd(s) elevation strge used Description
(origin) (cfs) (mm) (mm) (cuft) (ft) (cuft)
1 SSUH Runoff 0.493 2 474 7.273 Basin #1
2 SBUH Runoff 0.570 2 474 8,410 Basin #2
3 SBUH Runoff 0.108 2 474 1,591 Basin #3
4 SBUH Runoff 0.062 2 474 909 Basin #4
5 SBUHRunoff 0.154 2 474 2,273 BasinNODOTROW
NES13_Hydraflow.gpw Return Period: 25 Year Friday, 10/25 / 2019
Hydraflaw Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Autodesk. Inc. v2020
Hyd. No. 2
Basin #2
C
Friday, 10/2512019
Hydrograph typeStorm frequencyTime intervalDrainage areaBasin SlopeTc methodTotal precip.Storm duration
Q (cfs)
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
= SBUH Runoff= 25 yrs= 2mm= 0.370 ac= 0.0%= User= 6.50 in= 24 hrs
Basin #2
Peak dischargeTime to peakHyd. volumeCurve numberHydraulic lengthTime of conc. (Tc)DistributionShape factor
= 0.570 cfs= 7.90 hrs= 6,410 cuft= 98= Oft= 5.00 mm= Type IA= n/a
Q (fs)
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
CHydrograph Report
21
Hyd. No. 2 —25 Year
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26
Hyd No. 2Time (hrs)
CHydrograph Report
23
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Aulodesk, Inc. v2020
Hyd. No. 4
Basin #4
Friday, 10/25/2019
Hydrograph typeStorm frequencyTime intervalDrainage areaBasin SlopeTc methodTotal precip.Storm duration
Q (cis)
0.10
009
0.08
0.07
0.06
005
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.00
= SBUH Runoff= 25yrs= 2 mm= 0.O4Oac= 0.0 %= User= 6.50 in= 24 hrs
Basin #4
Peak dischargeTime to peakHyd. volumeCurve numberHydraulic lengthTime of conc. (Tc)DistributionShape factor
= 0.O62cfs= 7.90 tirs= 909 cuft= 98= 0 ft= 5.00 mm= Type IA= n/a
Q (cfs)
0.10
0.09
0.08
0.07
0.06
0.05
0 04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.00
Hyd. No. 4—25 Year
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 16 20 22 24 26
Hyd No. 4Time (hrs)
Ci C’ 25Hydraflow Rainfall ReportHydraflow Hydmgraphs Exlension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® 2019 by Aulodesk, Inc. v2020 Friday, 10/25/2019
rROUffl Intensity-Duration-Frequency Equation Coefficients (FHA)Period -
-___________________ —_________________
(Yrs) 0 0 E - (N/A)
cocoa cocoa o.oooo2 69.8703 13.1000 0.8558
3 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
5 79.2597 14.6000 0.8369
10 88.2351 15.5000 0,8279
25 102.6072 165000 0.8217
50 114.8193 17.2000 0.8199
100 127.1596 17.8000 0.8186
File name SampleFRA idi
Intensity = B I (Tc + D)E
[turn Intensity Values (iNhr)Period
L..., .._-_--, .... ..-___ - .--... , --
(Yrs) 5mm ‘ 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60
1 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 ‘ 0.00 000 coo coo 0,00 0.00 0.00
2 5,69 4.51 3.89 3.38 2.99 2.69 2.44 2.24 2.07 1.93 1.81 1.70
3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 0.00
5 6.57 5,43 4.65 4.08 3.65 3.30 3.02 2.79 2.59 2.42 2.27 2.15
10 7.24 6.04 5.21 4.59 4.12 3.74 3.43 3.17 2.95 2.77 2.60 2.46
25 8.25 6.95 6.03 5.34 4,80 4.38 4.02 3.73 3,48 3.26 3.07 2.91
50 9.04 7.65 6.66 5.92 5.34 4.87 4.49 4.16 3.88 3.65 344 3.25
100 9.83 836 7.30 6.50 5,87 I 5.36 4.94 4,59 4.29 4.03 3.80 3.60
Tc = time in minutes. Values may exceed 60.
nary Jones\NES-13 (Pelican Buildinq)\NES1 3-DOCSREPORTS\STORM - (Storm Repori)\HydrafloLincoln City pcp
Rainfall Precipitation Table (in)‘Sto -._________
.
‘ “l
Distribution 1-yr 2-yr 3-yr 5-yr 10-yr 25-yr 50-yr 100-yr
SCS 24-hour 0.00 4.20 2.10 ‘ 0.00 570 6.50 7.00 7.50
SCS 6-Hr 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ‘ 0.00
Huff-lst 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Huff-2nd 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Huff-3rd 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 0.00
Huff4th 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Huff-Indy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Custom 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 0.00
C
Pelican Brewing Lincoln CityPipe Conveyance Calculations
Prepared by Harper Houf Peterson Righellis, Inc.
HHPR Job No. NES-13October 2019
Pipe Pipe Velocity CapacitySegment Upstream Basin Size Area Per. N Q25 (1) Slope QCAPACIfl Full Met?
(in) (sf) (ft) (—) (cfs) (%) (cfs) (Ips)
Pipe Conveyance1 1 8 0.35 2.09 0.013 0.49 0.50% 0.85 2.45 YES2 2 8 0.35 2,09 0.013 0.57 0.50% 0.85 2.45 YES3 3 8 0.35 2.09 0.013 0.11 0.50% 0.85 2.45 YES4 4 8 0.35 2.09 0.013 0.06 0.50% 0.85 2.45 YESA A 8 0.35 2.09 0.013 0.15 0.50% 0.85 2.45 YES
(1) Q25 peak flow information provided from Hydraflow Hydrographs program
C C
Pelican Brewpub5911 Highway 101
Lincoln City, Oregon
sions Intl
July 2.2019
GSI Project pelican- 9-I
C Cjuly 2,2019 pelican-I 9-I-gi
Provide recommendations for floor slab support. retaining walls, and thicknesses for base rock andasphalt concrete pavements.
— Provide a written report summarizing the results of our geotechnical evaluation.
SITE OBSERVATIONS AND CONDITIONSSurface ConditionsThe site is located at 5911 Highway 101 in south Lincoln City, Oregon at the site of the existing BayHouse restaurant in the Cutler City area. The site includes an existing low rise restaurant building inthe north with associated paving for a drive and parking extending to the south, all of it Bayfront. TheBayfront slope is roughly 6 feet high inclined at roughly l.5-2H:lV, and armored with 2-3 foot boulderrip-rap near the building and large concrete block near the parking. 2018 surce features can be seenon the attached Site Plan,
The site is occupied by a single story restaurant structure and related pavements and utilities that areplanned to be demolished. The base of the existing structure appears to be near grade, with parkingelevated above the ground to the east. Pavement with fatigued areas is present in the central drive anddelivery areas, with little fatigue in the southern parking areas.
Subsurface ConditionsThe site was explored on June 27, 2019 with 4 mud rotary drilled borings. The approximate locationsof our explorations are shown on the attached Site Plan. According to geologic maps of the area thesite is underlain by alluvial deposits abutting marine siltstone to the east of Highway 101. Soil conditionsencountered are generally consistent with this mapping and also include a cap of generally sand andgravel fill.
Thin pavement asphalt concrete and base rock sections in the borings were underlain by 5-I 0 feet ofgravel and sand fill, silty in some areas, which was generally medium dense with a few loose zones.Blowcounts (Nas) in the fill generally ranged from 5 to 29. Moisture contents were 18-51%, higherwhere silt content was high or trace organics or clay was present.
Under the fill in B-I and 3-2 we encountered generally medium dense poorly graded fine sand with tracefines (to clean) and with a variable low content of small subangular gravels. Blow counts in the sandwere from S to 22 and averaged about 13. Moisture contents generally ranged from 23-30%, with a fewhigh exceptions were organic fragments were present
The sand was underlain at a depth of 27 feet in B-2 (nearer the bay) by silt with gravel sized weatheredclasts inferred as derived from intactlin place siltstone based on the unweathered fractures and hardconsistency at depth (It is possible the lower siltstone was a large colluvial block). In B-I weencountered colluvial silt below the sand, also derived from siltstone, but underlain by alluvial silty sandand sandy silt with trace organics and discernible bedding. This silt may be part of an old slide deposit.now buried.
Sand Fill - This unit was 3 to 4 feet thick under site pavements in B- I, and not present in P- I, and wasgenerally medium dense.. Moisture content was 18% for one sample tested.
2/81112 7th Street Oregon City, OR 97045 p 503.6513487 f503.722.9946
C Cjuly 2, 20(9 pelican-I 9-I-gi
greater than 4 feet We recommend that the type and design of the shoring system be the responsibility ofthe contractor, who is in the best position to choose a system that fits the overall plan of operation.
Pipe bedding should be installed in accordance with the pipe manufacturers’ recommendations. Ifgroundwater seepage is presern in the base of the utility trench excavation, we recommend over-excavatingthe trench by 12 to I 8 inches and placing trench stabilization material in the base. Trench stabilization materialshould consist of well-graded, crushed rock or crushed gravel with a maximum particle size of 4 inches and befree of deleterious materials. The percent passing the U.S. Standard #200 Sieve shall be less than 5 percent byweight when tested in accordance with ASTM C 117.
Trench backfill above the pipe zone should consist of well graded, angular crushed rock or sand fill withno more than 7 percent passing a #200 sieve. Trench backfill should be compacted to 92 percentrelative to ASTM D I 557, and construction of hard surfaces, such as sidewalks or pavement, should notoccur within one week of backfilling.
Slopes - Temporary slopes may be inclined up to I .25H: IV for slopes up to 8 feet high. Such slopesshould be expected to erode somewhat, depending on weather conditions and duration of exposure.Permanent slopes should be inclined no steeper than .5H: IV for slopes up to 6 feet high, and 2H: IVabove that Erosion control is critical to maintaining slopes, and we recommend the existing shorefrontprotection remain in place or be matched with new material of similar size and angularity as it isproviding suitable shoreline protection. Drainage must be routed away from slope faces.
Infiltration - Infiltration is not recommended due to shallow ground water and exacerbatingliquefaction and shorefront slope concerns.
Helical Pier and Grade Beam FoundationsGeneral - Due to the presence of a liquefiable upper sand unit, foundations must be supported on piersembedded into soils below those sands. Liquefaction induced settlement is estimated at 4-5 inches, withlateral spreading of several inches toward the Siletz River channel on the west side of the bay. Based onour explorations, soils not susceptible to significant liquefaction deformations and suitable to achievefoundation support capacity are roughly 25 to 35 feet below the surface. This depth may be differentunder the existing building footprint to the north of our accessible borings, perhaps shallower based onadjacent topography and siltstone expression across the highway. Capacities listed herein may be limitedby the structural capacity of the pier and must be evaluated by a structural engineer. Piers must be spaceda minimum of 3 pier diameters apart. Closer spacing will result in a reduction in pier capacity resultingfrom group effects and we must be consulted.
Continuous grade beams with embedded fixed head pier support can be used with a crawl space or beintegral with a reinforced slab. If the slab is to be sacrificial and support only floor loads, it does not needto be designed to structurally span between grade beams, For support of equipment or heavier storageareas such as coolers or freezers, a structural floor designed to free span to grade beams is recommended.
Helical PiersFeasibility of installation of helical piers to suitable depths must be proven with use of indicator piersprior to construction. If penetration is feasible, helical piers can be used to support vertical loads, andinclined piers can be used to provide lateral resistance. Piers are generally installed in 5 to 7-foot long
4/811(2 7th Street, Oregon City, OR 97045 p 503.657.3487 f503.722.9946
C Cjuly 2,20(9 pelican-I 9-I-gi
Ground MoistureGeneral - The perimeter ground surface and hard-scaping should be sloped to drain away from allstructures. Gutters must be tight-lined to a suitable discharge and maintained as free-flowing. All crawlspaces must be adequately ventilated. Due to shallow groundwater anticipated at the site, basementsare not allowed.
Perimeter Foundation Drains - We recommend installing perimeter foundation drains around allexterior foundations to reduce crawl space infiltration and/or underslab moisture. The foundationdrains should consist of a two-foot wide zone of drain rock encompassing a 4-inch diameter perforatedpipe, all enclosed with a non-woven filter fabric. The drain rock should have no more than 2 percentpassing a #200 sieve and should extend to within one foot of the ground surface. The geosyntheticshould be a Propex Geotex 601 or equivalent. One foot of low permeability soil (such as the on-sitesilt) should be placed over the fabric at the top of the drain to isolate the drain from surface runoff.Foundation drains must be routed to a suitable discharge.
Seismic DesignGeneral - In accordance with the International Building Code (IBC) 2003 as adopted by SOSSC, thesubject project soils are site class F, but Site Class D can be used for design of the planned structure.
The preceding recommendations follow code criterion. However, design level recurrence of amplifiedpeak horizontal ground accelerations from the relatively near field Cascadia Subduction Zone (CSZ)interface earthquakes is expected to be at least 0.5g for repeated cycles. Because of this and severalminutes of expected strong ground motions, the owner may want the structural engineer to considerdesigning to a higher performance level to reduce building damage and improve egress during such anevent. There is roughly a 30 percent chance of a CSZ interface earthquake occurring in the next SOyears, although the recurrence is episodic and could occur at any time.
Liquefaction — Liquefaction occurs in saturated, low cohesion soils. Strong shaking, such as thatexperienced during earthquakes, causes the densification and the subsequent settlement of these soils.We completed detailed liquefaction analyses of the site soils. An estimated 4-5 inches of verticalsettlement from densification of the underlying sand is expected. Lateral spreading of several inches toover a foot is also expected toward the Silea River channel west in the bay. This may lead to groundcracks, surface damage, and sand venting.
Tsunami - Tsunami hazard (DOGAMI OFR 0-95-IS, TIM-Linc-02) maps indicate that the entire site willlikely be inundated during a design level CSZ earthquake, and the frontage may be impacted by a largedistant earthquake as well. Evacuation plans must be implemented by the owners and occupants.Structural damage is expected from tsunami impacts, and re-occupancy is an unrealistic goal unlessspecifically designed for by the structural engineer. It should be noted that in either case liquefactiondeformations will impact the site.
Coseismic Subsidence - The existing ground surface may drop several feet in elevation after a designlevel earthquake. This may impact flood elevations and further inundation.
6/8II 12 7th Street, Oregon City, OR 97045 p 503.657.3487 f503.722.9946
july2. 20)9
C Cpelican-I 9-I -gi
We appreciate the opportunity to work with you on this project and look forward to our continuedinvolvement Please contact us if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Don Rondema, MS. PE, GEPrincipal
Attachments:
Site Plan. Soil Classification. Boring Logs, Moisture Contents
8/8
Epes 12PJ11k6]
1112 7t Sti’eet Oregon City, OR 97045 p503.657.3487 f503.722.9946
C C)
GUIDELINES FOR CLASSIFICATION OF SOIL
Description of Relative Density for Granular Soil
Standard Penetration ResistanceRelative Density
(N-values) blows per foot
very loose 0-4
loose 4- 10medium dense 10 -30
dense 30 - 50very dense over 50
Description of Consistency for Fine-Grained (Cohesive) Soils
Standard Penetration Torvane
Consistency Resistance (N-values) Undrained Shear
blows per foot Strength, tsf
very soft 0 - 2 less than 0.125
soft 2-4 0.125-0.25
medium stiff 4-8 0.25 - 0.50
stiff 8- 15 0.50- 1.0
very stiff 15-30 1.0-10
hard over 30 over 2.0
Grain-Size Classification
Modifier for Subclassification
. . Percentage of OtherAdjective
Material In Total Sample
Clean/Occasional 0 - 2Trace 2-10Some 10-30
Sandy, Silty, Clayey, etc. 30 - 50
Boulders
Cobbles
Gravel
Sand
Description Size
12-36 in.
3- 12 in.
7. - ‘/ in. (fine)
‘7. -3 in. (coarse)
No. 200 - No. 40 Sieve (fine)
No.40 - No. 10 sieve (medium)
No. 10 - No. 4 sieve (coarse)
Pass No, 200 sieveSilt/C lay
2.5” asphalt concrete over 4 inches crushed rock with some silt
C
Loose, gray and brown, poorly graded fine SAND FILL with some silt andgravel; moist
becomes very stiff, less fractured, more intact
39 ft becomes hard, moderately weathered SILTSTONE (noorange joint staining).
Mud rotary boring completed at a depth of 41.5 feet on June 27.2019 andbentonite grouted then gravel and cold patched AC surface.
arnpIes and Data
Soil and Rock Description
j
becomes SANDY SILT FILL
Medium dense, gray, poorly graded fine SAND: with trace gravel and tracesilt to clean; wet.
becomes loose, fine to medium.
becomes medium dense, fine, with some small gravels
occasional gravels
Stiff, dark gray (with orange joint staining). SILT / gravel sized claw ofseverely weathered highly fractured sikstone; wet
w = moisture content= SPT blowcount
* = No recovery
w = 22%
w51%
w = 52%
w = 30%
w = 30%
NR
w = 28%
w21%
w 9%
30—
40-
Gejitech BORING 3-2OIUtIOflS I nd Pelican-19-I-gi
C CSamples and Data
Soil and Rock Description w = moisture contentN05 = sr blowcount* = No recovery
a ft —
_______
25’ asphalt concrete over 4 inches crushed rock with some silt
Medium dense gray and brown gravelly SAND FILL with trace to some silt::; moist
EElbecomes loose to very loose occasional gravel LI NR
becomes silty w = 41%
10—
20 —
30 —
Mud rotary boring completed at a depth of 9 feet on June 27, 20 9 and
40 bentonite grouted then gravel and cold patched AC surface.
feotech BORING B4Solutions I flCI Peflcan-19-I-gi