TCD March 2007 1
Chapter 8
Nanoscale Magnetism
8.1 Characteristic length scales
8.2 Thin films
8.3 Thin film heterostructures
8.4 Wires and needles
8.5 Superparamagnetism
8.6 Bulk nanostructures
TCD March 2007 2
One nanoscale dimension: Thin films
Two nanoscale dimensions: Nanowires and acicular particles
Three nanoscale dimensions: Nanoparticles
TCD March 2007 3
Fig 8.1 Magnetostriction in iron thin films
TCD March 2007 4
8.1 Characteristic length scales
Exchange length Hardness parameter
Spin diffusion length !sd >> ! mean free path
TCD March 2007 5
8.2 Thin films
surface
interface
substrate
Intrinsic magnetic properties Ms, TC, K1, !s can be
significantly different in thin films and in the bulk.
Epitaxial filmsOriented films
Lattice parameters are influenced by the substrate, when the difference is < 4%
Seed and cap layers.
TCD March 2007 6
2.1 Magnetization and Curie Point
Some metals become ferromagnetic in thin film form (V, Rh) although they are not magnetically ordered in the bulk;Others become ferromagnetic when deposited on a ferromagnetic substrate (Pd on Ni)
Magnetism of iron is especially sensitive to structure and lattice parameters.
Fe has moment of 4 µB as an isolated atom;
3.3 µB in a chain,
3.0 µB as a plane
2.2 µB in the bulk
bcc iron has a surface layer wth a moment 20% greater than the bulk..
Moment enhancement is due to band narrowing related to reduction in the number of nearest-neighbours
TCD March 2007 7
Curie temperature of thin films of 3d transition metals on various substrates
Number of planes
TC is weakened in ultra-thin films by the reduction in the number of exchange bonds,
Also by surface spin waves, structural relaxation.
TCD March 2007 8
A uniformly-magnetized thin film produces no stray field.
B" = µ0 (H"+ M")= 0. B" is continuous Hence H" = 0 outside
-N M"; N =1
H|| = -NM|| .; N= 0. H|| is continuous. Hence H|| = 0 outside
TCD March 2007 9
2.2 Anisotropy and domain structure
Extra ‘3s’ contributions to the anisotropy of a thin film: – shape; surface; strain.’
The demagnetizing factor for a uniformly magnetized film is N = (0, 0, 1)
The anisotropic contribution to the self energy in the demagnetizing field is -(1/2)µ0MHd
#
– Shape
E = -Ku sin2# where Kshape = -(1/2) µ0Ms
2
Fe -1.85 MJ m-3
Co -1.27
Ni -0.15
This has to be overcome by some other form of anisotropy if we want to make a true permanent magnet.
TCD March 2007 10
– Surface
8.4 Surface anisotropy per unit area cobalt thickness for CoPd multilayers
Intercept gives Esurface ! 1 mJ m-2
Surface anisotropy often leads to perpendicularanisotropy in films about one nm thick.
Monolayer thickness is about 0.25 nm; This surface anisotropy corresponds to 4 MJ m-3, as in L10 compounds
TCD March 2007 11
– Strain
Fig 8.5 Strain anisotropy induced by epitaxy.The strain in Ni layers on Cu is relaxed beyond4.5 nm
1050
TCD March 2007 12
Fig 8.6 Twist of magnetization due to surface anisotropyKs (mJ m-2+)
Euler equation
Out of plane with a twist when Kv > (1/2)µ0Ms2
Magnetic structure of thin films
TCD March 2007 13
Fig 8.7 Magnetization and domain structure in a film with perpendicular anisotropy
Maze domains
Bubble domains
TCD March 2007 14
Magnetization of thin films. Q = -Ku/Kd where Kd = (1/2)µ0Ms2
Perpendicular anisotropy for Q > 1; Maze domains
In plane when Q < 1 and t < 2$w
Fig 8.8 Magnetic structure of a thin film as a function of Q and thickness t
TCD March 2007 15
Fig 8.9. Magnetization curves and surface domain structure for a 200 nm film of Ni.Magnetization curves show the magnetization is largely in-plane. The MFM image of strayfield at the surface picks up the small perpendicular component.
TCD March 2007 16
8.3 Thin film heterostructures
3.1 Direct exchange coupling; exchange bias
A magnetic multilayer is a stack of alternating magnetic and nonmagnetic layers.
A bilayer is a pair of layers of different magnetic materials
A superlattice is an epitaxial multilayer
FM2
FM1
FM2
AF
FM
F1
YCo2
GdCo2
Field-controllable domain wall
TCD March 2007 17
Exchange Bias.
Discovered by Mieklejohn and Bean; 1956 ‘A new type of magnetic anisotropy has been discovered, which is bestdescribed as exchange anisotropy. This anisotropy is a result of an interaction between an antiferromagnetic materialand a ferromagnetic material’
Fig 8.11 Rotational hysteresis of the same particles
Fig 8.10 Shifted hysteresis loop of Co particles measured on field cooling in 1 T to 77 K
CoO
Co
TCD March 2007 18
Exchange bias of thin films.
Néel 1964
AFM
FM
Fig 8.13
TCD March 2007 19
It is as if an effective field Heff = H + Hex is acting on the film; Hex ! 4 kA/m; µ0Hex ! 50 mT
H
%M
Hex = Kex/µ0M2
x
y
z
The energies are better written per unit area of film as exchange bias scales with the area.
Kex = &/tp The energy per unit area is:
The corresponding field is EA/µ0Mptp
Minimize EA
Switching occurs when %='/2; H = Hex = -&/Mptp Perpendicular anisotropy field Ha = (&+2Kutp )/µ0Mptp
TCD March 2007 20
Dependence on layer thickness
Hex! 1/tp
Fig 8.14
There is a threshold taf necessary for exchange bias to become effective; tcritKas ! &; tcrot = 10 nm, Kaf = 20 kJ m-3 & ! 0.2 mJ m-2
TCD March 2007 21
Table 8.2. Antiferromagnetic Materials for Exchange Bias
Exchange bias only becomes effective below a blocking temperature Tb which is considerably lower than TN
TCD March 2007 22
Models for exchange bias
*Atomically flat antiferomagnetic surface.
A) could be spin compensated; & = 0; B) could present one ferromagnetic plane; & = A/d ! 200 mJ m-2
*Only about 1/1000 of the spins seem to participate in the exchange coupling.
Surface is inevitably rough. Regions of dimension L contain (L/a)2 atoms. Uncompensated moment is that of ((L/a)2
atoms. Hence L ≈ 1000a ! 200 nm. OK But these regions will themselves add randomly.
* Exchange bias may arise from defects of grain boundaries where there are frustrated spins
TCD March 2007 23
Models for exchange bias
Fig 8.16
* Interfacial coupling leads to perpendicular fm and afm axes. Coupling energy will be similar to that in a 90degree domain wall; (1/2)((KAaf) ! 0.4 mJ m-2
TCD March 2007 24
Fig. 8. 17
Fig. 8. 18
TCD March 2007 25
3.2 Indirect exchange coupling
Fig. 8. 17
Fig 8.21 Oscillations of the exchange coupling betweenferromagnetic layers as a function of the rutheniumspacer thickness
TCD March 2007 26
Fig 8.20 The aliasing effect
FM
FM
Artificial Antiferromagnet
FM
FM
Artificial Ferrimagnet
Best for af coupling is 0.8 nm Ru
Ru
Ru
TCD March 2007 27
TCD March 2007 28
3.3 Dipolar coupling
A perfectly smooth film createsno stray field. Correlatedroughness leads to orange-peelcoupling
With tn,the spacer thickness - 5nm, roughness $ = 1 nm, period l = 20 nm, the coupling is 0.03 mJ m-2
TCD March 2007 29
3.4 Giant magnetoresistance
The GMR effect was discovered by Fert et al in 1988
Magnetoresistance in an Fe/Cr multilayer was as high as 80 %at low temperature and in high fields
Much greater than AMR - hence the name.
First understanding in terms of the Mott two-current model.The ) and * channels conduct in parallel, with no spin-flipscattering. +)and +* are the resistivities of the twochannels. , = +)/+*
Fig 8.22 Derivation of GMR in the two-current model
Fig 8.23 GMR of an Fe/Cr multilayer
TCD March 2007 30
Fig 8.24
TCD March 2007 31
3.5 Spin valves
FM
FM
(pseudo) Spin valve
Cu
TCD March 2007 32
TCD March 2007 33
TCD March 2007 34
3.6 Magnetic tunnel junctions
FM
FM
Magnetic tunnel junction
AlOx
I
V
I = GV + -V3 E
!
w
•Nonlinear I:V
• Current decreasesexponentially with thickness w
• Little temperature dependenceV
TCD March 2007 35
I
Julière formula:MR = 2P1P2/(1 - P1P2)
If P1 = P2
MR = 2P2/(1 - P2)
Taking P = 45%, MR = 51%
magnetic tunnel junction
Parallel ))
Antiparallel )*
Juliere formula for TMR
TCD March 2007 36
Fig 8.25
500 % TMR
TCD March 2007 37
•Majority channel tunneling is dominated by thetransmission through a !1 (sp) state
•!1 state decays rapidly in anti-parallel configuration
Calculation of tunelling through a an Fe/MgO/Fe crystalline tunnel barrier
100 200 .
R/R
%
µ0H (mT)
Exchange-biased MgOmagnetic tunnel junction
TCD March 2007 38
A thin layer of ferromagnetic insulator can act as a spin filter, producing a spin-polarized tunnel current. An N/F/N structure. F = EuO, NiFe2O4, CoFe2O4…
The spin-split barrierfavours)electron tunneling.
Evac
EF
*
)w1
w2
.ex
t
%
I
))
t
%%
***
Spin filter
TCD March 2007 39
Metal/Insulator/Superconductor junctions
Fig 8.27
Tederov-Meservey experiment
TCD March 2007 40
TCD March 2007 41
8.4 Wires and needles
Acicular particles 30x30x300 nm are used inmagnetic recording.
N < 0.1
Shape anisotropy
Kshapa = [(1-3N)/4]µ0Ms2
For a long wire Kshapa = (1/4]µ0Ms2
Maximum anisotropy field 2Kshape/µ0Ms = Ms/2
The coercivity cannot exceed Ms/2 – not enoughfor a permanent magnet.
TCD March 2007 42
Sophisticated nanostructures with spinodal nanostructureof oriented acicular Fe-Co in a nonmagnetic Al-Ni matrix,developed mainly in the 1930s.
Shape anisotropy: Ea = (1/4)µ0(1- 3N)Ms2sin2# = "1 sin
2#
Anisotropy field: Ha = 2K1/µ0Ms = (1/2)(1- 3N)MS
HC < -HA
Coercivity due to shape anisotropy < Ms/2
Insufficient for a permanent magnet!
FeCo
NiAl
Alnico
TCD March 2007 43
8.5 Superparamagnetism
Energy landscape of a superparamagnetic particle
1//0 ! 1 GHz
TCD March 2007 44
T
0 blocked Tb superparamagnetic TC paramagnetic
Blocking is not a phase transition, but an exponential variation of fluctuation tims
Superparamagnetic behaviour of cobalt nanoparticles
TCD March 2007 45
When an ensemble of superparamagnetic particles is cooled through Tb in a magnetic field, it acquires athermoremanent magnetization.
Igneous rocks (basalts) contain superparamagneticmagnetite particles. They acquire a TRM as they cool inthe Earth’s magnetic field.
TCD March 2007 46
5.1 Magnetic viscosity
coercivity
spontaneous magnetization
remanence
major loop
virgin curveinitial susceptibility
The entire hysteresis loop reflects metastable states. The magnetization at any point evolves with time
M(t) = M(0) - S ln t
M
Ln t
Viscosity coefficient
TCD March 2007 47
8.6 Bulk nanostructures
Fig 8 .29
TCD March 2007 48
6.1 Single-phase nanostructures
In single-phase nanostructures the bulk anisotropy can be greatly reduced by exchange coupling ofnanocrystallites with different anisotropy axes. Exchange-averaging occurs when 1. Crystallites aresingle-domain with D << $w and 2. There is exchange coupling across grain boundaries.
TCD March 2007 49
Coercivity vs. grain size for a range of soft
magnetic materials.
Fig 8.30
TCD March 2007 50
Remanence enhancement:
TCD March 2007 51
6.2 Two-phase nanostructures
Two-phase nanostructures can be produced by partial recrystallization of an amorphousmaterial
If vc is the volume fraction of the crystalline phase, which has anisotropy K1, and theamorphous phase has no anisotropy.
TCD March 2007 52
Recrystallization of amorphous Fe-Cu-Nb-Si-B to obtain a two-phase crystalline/amorphous soft nanocomposite
Finemet is a near-ideal soft magnetic material
with high polarization ! 1.6 T
zero magnetostriction
Minimal anisotropy
TCD March 2007 53
TCD March 2007 54
Hard/soft nanocomposite;
Nd2Fe14B/Fe
SmCo5/Co35Fe65
$w is too short to average away anisotropy,When the size of the soft region is <! 2$w the
soft and hard phases are exchange coupled. andbehave in an averaged way,
In this way it is possible to obtain a hardmaterial with a magnetization greater than anysingle-phase hard magnet.
Fig 8.33
TCD March 2007 55
Fig. 8.33
TCD March 2007 56
Fig 8.35
Top Related