CHAPTER 5
CIVIL LIBERTIES
FREEDOM OF SPEECH
Schenk v US (1919) Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance
FREEDOM OF SPEECH
Gitlow v New York (1925) Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance
14th Amendment Selective
incorporation
FREEDOM OF SPEECH
Dennis v US (1950) Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance
FREEDOM OF SPEECH
Brandenburg v Ohio (1969)
Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance
FREEDOM OF SPEECH
Snyder v Phelps (2011) Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance
FREEDOM OF SPEECH
Miller v California (1973) Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance
FREEDOM OF SPEECH
Reno v ACLU (1997) Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance
FREEDOM OF SPEECH
Tinker v Des Moines (1968)
Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance
FREEDOM OF SPEECH
Texas v Johnson (1990)
Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance
FREEDOM OF SPEECH
Morse v Frederick (2002) Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance
FREEDOM OF ASSEMBLY
Nazi Party v. Skokie (1977) Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance
FREEDOM OF RELIGION: ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSEMcCollum v BOE (1948) Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance
FREEDOM OF RELIGION: ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE
Engle v Vitale (1962) Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance
FREEDOM OF RELIGION: ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE
Abington School District v Schempp (1963) Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance
FREEDOM OF RELIGION: ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE
Moment of Silence Prayer in government meetings
FREEDOM OF RELIGION: ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE
Epperson v Arkansas (1968) Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance
FREEDOM OF RELIGION: ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE
Lemon v Kurtzman (1971) Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance
FREEDOM OF RELIGION: FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE
Reynolds v US (1878) Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance
FREEDOM OF RELIGION: FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE
West Virginia v Barnette (1943) Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance
FREEDOM OF RELIGION: FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE
Wisconsin v Yoder (1970) Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance
FREEDOM OF RELIGION: FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE
Oregon v Smith (1990) Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance
FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
New York Times v US (1971)
Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance
CRIME AND DUE PROCESS
4TH Amendment: Mapp v Ohio (1961)
Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance
FREEDOM OF RELIGION: FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE
5th Amendment: Miranda v Arizona (1966)
Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance
FREEDOM OF RELIGION: FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE
6th Amendment: Gideon v Wainwright (1963)
Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance
FREEDOM OF RELIGION: FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE
8th Amendment: Furman v Georgia (1972)
Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance
RIGHT TO PRIVACY: 4th Amendment
Griswold v Connecticut (1965) Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance
RIGHT TO PRIVACY: 4th Amendment
Roe v. Wade (1973) Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance
RIGHT TO PRIVACY: 4th Amendment
Webster v Reproductive Health Services (1988)
Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance
CHAPTER 6
CIVIL RIGHTS
OVERVIEW
Civil Liberties v. Civil Rights Civil Rights:
Reasonableness standard Suspect classification
2 categories of protection: 14th Amendment
Due Process Clause (selective incorporation) Equal Protection Clause
Civil Rights Legislation
SLAVERY
Dred Scott v Sanford (1857)
Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance
CIVIL WAR AMENDENTS
13th
14th
15th
JIM CROW LAWS
SEGREGATION
Plessy v Ferguson (1896)
Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE FUND
DESEGREGATION CASES
Brown v Board of Education (1954)
Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance
MASSIVE RESISTANCE
DESEGREGATION LEGISLATION
Civil Rights Act of 1964
Voting Rights Act of 1965
DESEGREGATION CASES
Heart of Atlanta Motel v US (1965)
Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance
AFFIRMATIVE ACTION
Green v County School Board (1967) Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance
AFFIRMATIVE ACTION
Swann v Charlotte-Mecklenburg (1971) Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance
AFFIRMATIVE ACTION
University of California v Bakke (1978)
Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance
AFFIRMATIVE ACTION
Gratz v Bollinger (2003) Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance
AFFIRMATIVE ACTION
Grutter v Bollinger (2003) Facts Question Ruling Reasoning Significance
WOMEN AND EQUAL RIGHTS
Gender equity laws: equal pay for equal work employment opportunity school admissions
Gender equity cases middle ground between
reasonableness and strict scrutiny
TITLE IX (1972)
No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance..
AGE DISCRIMINATION
Top Related