8/2/2019 Black Woman Professor Published Version
1/28
Black Woman Professor, by T. O. Patton; published 2004 in The Howard Journal ofCommunications 15(3), 185-200
Reflections of a Black Woman Professor: Racism and Sexism in Academia
By Tracey Owens Patton
ABSTRACT
This essay examines the interdependence of racism and sexism in academia. To frame the
discussion, the theory of articulation coupled with hegemony was used. The narrative examples
cited in this article illustrate a White supremacist hegemonic structure supported in academe. The
essay explicates and illuminates issues of marginalization in academia because it increases
awareness about interlocking systems of domination in academia at the microlevel, and in doing
so, exposes important meanings of marginalization at the macro level. Further, salient
intersections between discourse and hegemony are critically analyzed because the role
communicative interactions play in articulating the experiences of marginality become primary.
Key words: Articulation, Borders, Hegemony, Marginalization, Racism, Sexism, White
supremacy
Dr. Tracey Owens Patton (Ph.D. University of Utah) is Assistant Professor of Communication in
the Department of Communication and Journalism at University of Wyoming. Her main interestsinvolve critical intercultural communication, interracial representation, and rhetorical studies.Her research focuses on the interdependence between race, gender, and power and how these
issues interrelate culturally in education, media, and speeches. The author thanks the editor, Dr.
Jill Bystydzienski, and Samuel Patton for their helpful comments.
The outsider-within position (P. H. Collins, 1986) is often an appropriate descriptor
and phrase for women in general and non-Euro American women in particular who work in
academe. The outsider-within descriptor aptly denotes and calls attention to the continued
prevalence of interlocking systems of domination in academia and the multiple ways dominance
is enacted on university campuses. During the last decade numerous scholars have written about
their dis/enchantment with the academy, and Communication Theory (1999) devoted a journal
8/2/2019 Black Woman Professor Published Version
2/28
Black Woman Professor, by T. O. Patton; published 2004 in The Howard Journal ofCommunications 15(3), 185-200
2
issue to the subject, yet dis/enchantment continues to exist in academe. The most disturbing facet
of this acknowledgement is that marginalization continues to flourish despite attempts to
transform the academy.
In this essay, I discuss the interdependence of racism and sexism in academe. To frame
the discussion, I rely on the theory of articulation coupled with hegemony. I recount some of my
experiences in academe to explicate and illuminate issues of marginalization in academia. The
examples cited in this manuscript illustrate a White supremacist hegemony at the University. My
recounting of my experiences is not intended to represent or reflect the experiences of other
Black women or non-white women at largely Euro American universities. Rather, this analysis
seeks to dig much deeper; this article adds to the ongoing conversation other scholars have
undertaken thus far. I seek to contribute to this area of research by turning scholarly attention
toward the hegemonic reproduction involved in the maintenance of marginalization regarding
racism and sexism in academe. I hope to advance a productive critical analysis through critically
analyzing constructions of disenchantment in academe.
The significance of this analysis is that it increases awareness about interlocking systems
of domination in academia at the microlevel, and in doing so, exposes important meanings of
marginalization at the macro level. Further, salient intersections between discourse and
hegemony are critically analyzed because the role communicative interactions play in
articulating the experiences of marginality become primary. To this end, I begin with an
overview of the importance of the theory of articulation. The remainder of the article is divided
into three sections: enchantment, disenchantment, and re-articulation. Narrative examples (found
8/2/2019 Black Woman Professor Published Version
3/28
Black Woman Professor, by T. O. Patton; published 2004 in The Howard Journal ofCommunications 15(3), 185-200
3
in the disenchantment section) are from my experiences as a multiracial Black1
woman in
academia and are critically analyzed through the lens of the theory of articulation and hegemony.
The Theory of Articulation and Hegemony
The theory of articulation provides us with the means of critiquing language, discourse,
and power. The theory of articulation is inextricably linked with and wedded to hegemony. As
Asante (1998) notes
Speech is itself a political actWhenever one categorizes society in an effort to make
concepts functional, one makes a choice among possibilities. Making a choice among
possibilities creates cleavages that benefit some to the disadvantage of others. Through achoice in language and action, maintenance of the current white supremacist hegemonic
order becomes intertwined in the most intricate patterns of our conversation andlanguage. (p. 87-88)
The enactment of agency with regard to language choice and action becomes a subjective
choiceto maintain the status quo or use language that produces actions that challenge the
current hegemonic order. The reproduction of hegemony is itself not solely a problem of color,
but also a historical conceptual framework based upon values granted to particular racial
categories (Asante, 1998) and values granted to particular language and action choices.
Therefore, while White supremacy may be a function of the institutional structure, it maintains
its naturalization because individuals through their articulation and enactment of hegemony
perpetuate marginalization. This enactment of hegemony can take the form of the dissemination
of symbols and acts or speech itself (p. 89). In other words, a conception of so-called reality
takes place within the institution whether it is through action, language, or thought. Therefore, an
institutionalized social framework becomes naturalized, reified, and unquestioned. As Slack
(1997) explains,
1Black is used as an encompassing term to include both Africans and African Americans. This term is particularly
important because not all Black Americans claim African ancestry.
8/2/2019 Black Woman Professor Published Version
4/28
Black Woman Professor, by T. O. Patton; published 2004 in The Howard Journal ofCommunications 15(3), 185-200
4
Epistemologically, articulation is a way of thinking the structures of what we know as aplay of correspondences, non-correspondences and contradictions, as fragments in the
constitution of what we take to be unities. Politically, articulation is a way of
foregrounding the structure and play of power that entail in relations of dominance and
subordination. Strategically, articulation provides a mechanism for shaping intervention
within a particular social formation, conjuncture or context. (p. 112)
The theory of articulation requires an examination of the configuration of power in any social
condition, and through which people or institutions advance or defend their interests and devise
tactics and strategies appropriate to their aims (Fiske, 1996, p. 67). In other words, people must
examine the complicitousness through which they defend their action and language choices.
Language is intertwined with articulation because socially constructed knowledge,
language, and action shape the present situation and the status quo which, in turn, have the power
to shape the individual and the institution and to reinforce the hegemonic order (Hall, 1997). In
higher education, as W. R. Allen (1992) argued, there are numerous barriers that, collectively,
ensure that a status quo rooted in an unfair system of racial stratification is reproduced within
the university (p. 42). Among these barriers are culturally and economically biased standardized
tests, administration and faculty that is largely White male, high tuition costs and low financial
aid programs, an emphasis on competition, and little cultural pluralism and diversity. W. R.
Allen stated that the nations colleges and universities seem to be not only content with, but
committed to, the current system of structured inequality, a system in which African Americans
[and other ethnic minorities] suffer grievously (p. 42). Change in higher education and in
pedagogy, W. R. Allen noted, will only come when universities feel more responsibility to
change and challenge the current status quo:
If we fail to respond creatively and effectively to this challenge, not only will
history judge us harshly, but this country will also continue to suffer the negativeconsequences, such as the loss of its competitive edge in the world market, that
have resulted from its failure to develop fully and utilize the talents of all its
people, without regard to race, gender, or class. (p. 43)
8/2/2019 Black Woman Professor Published Version
5/28
Black Woman Professor, by T. O. Patton; published 2004 in The Howard Journal ofCommunications 15(3), 185-200
5
Whether intentionally or not, universities can signal their collusion with maintaining the
White supremacist hegemonic order even as it articulates itself as open and is often
polemically known as liberal due to complicitous language and actions that on the surface
appear to address hegemony, however, upon closer inspection, they ultimately maintain it
(Patton, 2004). Dziech and Hawkins (1998) believe that whether it is an extension of or a
reaction against its history, an institutions present always reflects its past, and that past
influences [marginalized bodies] profoundly (p. 560). To challenge hegemonic concerns,
academia must be ever evolving. Discourses are ways of constituting knowledge or truth.
Through discourse people make meaning and make sense of their everyday world. As people
communicate about their social world they create and construct truths. According to Deetz and
Mumby (1990), this process of communicating necessarily takes place in the context of power
relations. As these scholars showed, communication and how it is structured can reify and
restructure hegemony. In their view, communication can be said to function ideologically in
that it produces and reproduces (i.e., legitimates) a particular structure of power relations (i.e.,
systems of interests) to the arbitrary exclusion of other possible configurations of interests (p.
42). Thus a constant power struggle ensues because communication occurs in the context of
hegemonic relations.
Italian Marxist, Antonio Gramsci (1992), who first described hegemony, argued in his
1920 essay Notes on the Southern Question that, the proletariat in Italy could only become the
leading or dominant ruling class insofar as it, leads the allied classes [and] dominates the
opposing classes (p. 136). The notion of hegemony was expounded by Gramsci to include all
classes, not just the proletariat alone. As Gledhill (1997) explained,
Since power in a bourgeois democracy is as much a matter of persuasion and consent as
of force, it is never secured once and for all. Any dominant group has to a greater or
8/2/2019 Black Woman Professor Published Version
6/28
Black Woman Professor, by T. O. Patton; published 2004 in The Howard Journal ofCommunications 15(3), 185-200
6
lesser degree to acknowledge the existence of those whom it dominates by winning theconsent of competing or marginalized groups in society. Unlike the fixed grip over
society implied by domination, hegemony is won in the to-and-fro of negotiation
between competing social, political and ideological forces through which power is
contested, shifted or reformed. Representation is a key site in such struggle, since the
power of definition is a major source of hegemony. (p. 348)
According to Patton (2004),
Earlier constructions of the hegemonic order reified Euro Americans as the center (most
often Euro American males) and marginalized anyone who deviated from that
hegemonically supported standard. Currently, the racial hegemonic order continues to
support the belief of Euro Americans at the center. However, through the negotiation
process other marginalities have been recognized: class, gender, and sexuality. (p. 67)
Omi and Winant (1994) find that,
Race, class, gender (as well as sexual orientation) constitute regions ofhegemony, areas in which certain political projects can take shape. They share
certain obvious attributes in that they are all socially constructed, and they all
consist of a field of projects whose common feature is their linkage of social
structure and signification. (p. 68)
Fairclough (1998) believed that hegemony is socially constructed and supported. Hegemony, as
much as leadership, can also be thought of as domination across the economic, political,
cultural, and ideological domains of a society (p. 92). Fairclough echoed Omi and Winant
(1994), claiming,
Hegemony is a focus of constant struggle around points of greatest instability between
classes and blocs, to construct or sustain or fracture alliances and relations of
domination/subordination, which takes economic, political and ideological forms. (p. 92)
This hegemonic hierarchy as Omi and Winant describe seems to be supported through the power
of centered groups. Centered groups have the power to retain and maintain the hegemonic order
[and] have the power to mark, classify, assign, and represent those others (Patton, 2000, p. 62).
8/2/2019 Black Woman Professor Published Version
7/28
Black Woman Professor, by T. O. Patton; published 2004 in The Howard Journal ofCommunications 15(3), 185-200
7
These hegemonic dualities or dichotomies operate at such a deep level as to appear
normal or naturalized. The dualisms that dominate Western tradition started with
the Enlightenment and coincided with European expansionism [and] it is correlated
precisely with new forms of oppressionPlato and Descartes both built theirepistemologies expressly to deal with the pressures on local belief brought to bear by
contact with other culturesto find permanent, objective truths that would counteract theinflux of truths from alien cultures. (Sartwell, 1998, p. 118)
The European and American use of Enlightenment epistemologies have been used to rationalize
and justify colonialism, expansionism, exploitation of third world labor, the slave trade and has
been used to sustain and relocate rather than eradicate an order of racial difference inherited
from the premodern era (Gilroy, 1996, p. 49). Dualism threatens the university, because it is
framed by the dominant hegemonic paradigm that we have inherited from European and
American history.
Hegemony, therefore, can only be understood in its constant attempt to restructure and
refigure its strengths and weaknesses, and in its continual attempt to recuperate forms of
resistance that are as ongoing as they are different (Giroux, 1993, p. 37). Academicians who
struggle against current constructions of hegemony, particularly as they concern the
interdependent representations of racism and sexism, may find that these three regions of
oppression culminate into interlocking systems of domination that provide for a chilly climate in
academe. According to P. H. Collins (1991), race, class, and gender may not be the most
fundamental or important systems of oppression, but they have most profoundly affected
African-American women (p. 227).
Interlocking systems of domination refer to the fact that systems of oppressionclass,
gender, race, and sexual orientationare interdependent. Often it is the current U.S. hegemonic
order which insists upon the either/or beliefyou are either oppressed because you are a woman
8/2/2019 Black Woman Professor Published Version
8/28
Black Woman Professor, by T. O. Patton; published 2004 in The Howard Journal ofCommunications 15(3), 185-200
8
or because you are an ethnic minority. Interlocking systems of domination take into account the
interdependent nature of oppression through a both/and or dialectical perspectiveyou are a
woman andan ethnic minority anda lesbian who may be oppressed. Depending on the situation,
all groups have varying amounts of privilege and marginalization afforded to them.
Additionally, a person can be both an oppressor and oppressed (e.g., a poor White woman; an
upper class Asian woman, etc.). Therefore, through interlocking systems of domination
hegemony is challenged. However, despite these interlocking systems of domination, resistance
to ones marginalization, multiple identity, and oppression is often discounted and reduced to an
either/or dichotomy. At the borderland of womanhood stand women of color, the double bind2
,
and the outsider-within. A. C. Collins (2001) contended that at the intersection of race and
gender stand women of color, torn by the lines of bias that currently divide white from non white
in our society, and male from female (p. 29). As I attempt to challenge the hegemonic structure
by critiquing it, I am using language that reifies it through the terminology of border, center,
and margin. I implicitly re-privilege hegemony because I am trapped by a discursive cycle that
makes it difficult to de-center the status of the privileged class. I am using this rhetorical
contradiction to navigate a world that does not often include me.
Enchantment
Academe has at least statistically become a more ethnically diverse institution. For
example a slight increase in ethnic minority professors has occurred. In 1992, 13.5 percent of all
2According to Frye (2001) one of the most ubiquitous features of the world as experienced by oppressed people is
the double bindsituations in which options are reduced to a very few and all of them expose one to penalty,
censure, or deprivation (p. 49). In this paper, the double bind specifically refers to women who are also ethnic
minorities. Because of this double marginality ethnic minority women are often put into a bind, particularly within
discussions of race and gender because of an either/or mentality that is produceddoes a woman fight against
sexism or racism? Is it possible to fight against both successfully? Often one issue is prioritized over the other
(Patton, 2004, p. 86).
8/2/2019 Black Woman Professor Published Version
9/28
Black Woman Professor, by T. O. Patton; published 2004 in The Howard Journal ofCommunications 15(3), 185-200
9
university professors were of ethnic minority (National Center for Educational Statistics, 2000b).
In 1999, about 14% of U.S. faculty in colleges and universities were minorities. Less than 1%
were American Indian/Alaskan Native; 5.8% Asian/Pacific Islander; 5.1% Black; and 3.3%
Hispanic (National Center for Educational Statistics, 2000a). Sixty-four percent of faculty were
males and 36% were female (National Center for Educational Statistics, 2000b). African
American female professors comprised 2.6% of all faculty (National Center for Educational
Statistics, 2000c); this is an increase from 1% in 1994 (Sadker, 1994). Overall there was a slight
increase in ethnic minority professors in general, however, there has been a 0.1% drop in African
American professors. Despite the small increase with African American women, I am an
outsider-within. As an outsider-within, I am often the only Black person in the department, and
usually the only Black female in the department. I am the most visible invisible person in my
department. My presence, however, does more than check a few boxes for administrators.
Mypresence signals that in this ivory tower there are and always have been pioneers in
academia who have come before me. My presence paves the way for other women and women
of color who will come after me. Further, I am given the chance to give backto give back to all
of those who encouraged me. I am given the opportunity to work for the betterment of all. I am
enchanted with the idea that academe is a harbor, a place to pursue ones research. Academe is a
place to exchange ideas in the pursuit of ontological and epistemological development. My
enchantment is not different from that of others. B. J. Allen et al. (1999) noted the enchantment
of others: We were or are enchanted with the promise of the academy as a market place for the
exchange of diverse ideas, and sometimes we have experienced such exchanges, with exciting
and affirming consequencesOur discipline holds the omnipresent potential to have long-term,
positive effects on peoples lives regarding matters of difference (p. 403).
8/2/2019 Black Woman Professor Published Version
10/28
Black Woman Professor, by T. O. Patton; published 2004 in The Howard Journal ofCommunications 15(3), 185-200
10
It is this attractive seduction that academe holds for me: the opportunities to pursue my
passion, disseminate knowledge, and engage with my students, peers, and colleagues. However, I
am not immune to the negative or disenchanting aspects of academe. During my lifetime pursuit
of education, I have experienced attempts at racial tracking, invisibility in the classroom, and
many other common experiences of the ethnic minority student. As a professor I continue to
experience a chilly climate, isolation, prejudice, racism, sexism, silence, and lack of mentorship
and lack of supportive colleagues. As B. J. Allen et al. (1999) foun d, the source of our
disenchantment lies within the idealism associated with institutions of higher learning. We are
attracted to a profession and discipline that inherently promises an openness to studying and
teaching difference, yet more often than not falls short of this promise (p. 403).
Disenchantment
A slight increase in women and ethnic minority female professors does not remedy issues
of racism and sexism in academe; particularly if there is no challenge to current marginalized
issues and concepts surrounding hegemony (e.g., lack of discussions of current U.S. racial
hegemony). Often it is believed that universities are institutions that embrace diversity in terms
of different beliefs, ethnicities, lifestyles, and perspectives. However, this rhetoric is only true so
long as it serves to protect the White supremacist patriarchal hegemonic order (hooks, 1984).
Rather than the university being a place to explore diversity and to embrace diversity,
universities often become complicitous in domination and oppression. According to Wellman
(1999),
Border academics are troublesome to university culture because their crossings reveal
borders that are otherwise invisible. Border crossers expose borders that universities
refuse to recognize and deny guarding. Boarder academicians are double-trouble for theuniversity. When they are not revealing borders, they expose the conflated character of
other categories. (p. 90)
8/2/2019 Black Woman Professor Published Version
11/28
Black Woman Professor, by T. O. Patton; published 2004 in The Howard Journal ofCommunications 15(3), 185-200
11
My presence and experiences along with other marginalized voices shift the experience of the
marginalized to the center. It is through this shifting that the effects of hegemony become visible.
Race, Racism, Womanhood and the Borderland
Boundaries differ from borderlands in many significant ways. Boundaries define the
borders of nations, territories, imaginations, and communities (Cottle, 2000). Boundaries mark
out the limits of place, space, and territory. Boundaries serve to maintain hegemony because
boundaries by design are to include or exclude, and have the ability to shape social relations.
What makes boundaries even more insidious is the fact that because of the Black/White binary
one is either an outsider or an insiderboundaries can become deeply entrenched and thus
common sense. Cottle (2000) described the process through which boundaries become
entrenched:
Once institutionally sedimented and taken for granted, these boundaries all too often
harden into exclusionary barriers legitimized by cultural beliefs, ideologies and
representations. In such ways, the marginalized and the excluded can become
ontologically disenfranchised from humanity, misrecognized as Other, exploited andoppressed, in extremis, vulnerable to systematic, lethal violence. (p. 2)
We have seen these boundaries enacted in numerous ways: American Apartheid (segregation),
education, glass ceiling, golf courses, internment camps, and office boardrooms to name a few.
Borders, on the other hand, can be crossed.
The fact that borders are crossable, does not mean that hegemony is not employed.
Rather, sometimes people on the margins are allowed to cross if it serves the needs of those in
the center. One common example of this is the U.S. feminist movement. Numerous scholars
studied the feminist movement in detail. However, it is fair to say that even though most women
experienced some form of gender discrimination not all were allowed to participate in the
feminist movement in the same way. For example, some women felt that the feminist movement
8/2/2019 Black Woman Professor Published Version
12/28
Black Woman Professor, by T. O. Patton; published 2004 in The Howard Journal ofCommunications 15(3), 185-200
12
was only concerned with the problems of bourgeois, well educated, White women. hooks (1984)
illustrated this border-crossing when she stated,
The condescension they [white women] directed at black women was one of the means
they employed to remind us that the womens movement was theirsthat we were ableto participate because they allowed it, even encouraged it; after all, we were needed to
legitimate the process. They did not see us as equals. They did not treat us as equals. Andthough they expected us to provide first hand accounts of black experiences, they felt it
was their role to decide if these experiences were authentic (p. 11).
This example illustrates that while the feminist movement was constructed as a movement for
the betterment of all women, Black women were allowed to cross a socially-constructed White
womans movement so long as their border-crossing benefited the needs and desires of the
centered groupfinancially secure White women. This is similar to how women academicians
were allowed to border-cross into the ivory tower. But the experiences for non-White women
are not the same in academe. According to Gregory (1999) in her book detailing Black womens
experiences in academe, African American women faculty continued to be concentrated among
the lower ranks, primarily non-tenured positions, promoted at a slower rate, paid less than their
male and white female counterparts, located in traditional disciplines, and primarily employed by
two-year colleges (p. 11).
Turner and Myers (2000) examined the experiences of African Americans, Asian Pacific
Americans, American Indians, and Latino faculty, with those of White faculty at eight
Midwestern universities located in Illinois, Kansas, Michigan, Missouri, Minnesota, Nebraska,
Ohio, and Wisconsin. In addition to documenting the continued underrepresentation of faculty of
color in American colleges and universities, their data revealed the subtle but insidious influence
of a decidedly chilly work environment. Moreover, the study identified a number of barriers
including, racial and ethnic bias, that results in an unwelcoming and unsupportive work
environment. Undoubtedly, such an environment impacts the productivity and career
8/2/2019 Black Woman Professor Published Version
13/28
Black Woman Professor, by T. O. Patton; published 2004 in The Howard Journal ofCommunications 15(3), 185-200
13
satisfaction of ethnic minority faculty in the academe and discourages others from trying to enter
the professoriate (Turner & Myers, 2000, p. x).
Introduction to the Narratives
Women scholars of color, working as others do within interlocking discourses of
oppression, face significant challenges in attempting social change within the institutionor in using (borrowing?) institutional privilege to effect social change beyond the
institution (Williams, 2001, p. 89).
The three narratives critically analyzed in the remainder of the paper describe the
marginalization that I have faced in academia. My narratives show that marginalization
continues to flourish despite attempts to transform the academy. In addition, my narratives signal
that at any institution we are both transformed by and transform the organization. Even though I
am no longer at the institutions in which these narratives have taken place, I have been
intentionally vague about the particular details (i.e., context, location, and situation) in order to
protect the identities of those involved and myself from backlash. I have altered the narratives to
obscure identities. However, it should be noted that despite the necessary ambiguity, each
situation can be thoroughly understood and critically analyzed.
Narrative One: Sister Solidarity
The first narrative is an example of the division of among women, borders, hegemony,
and the double bind. I was at a meeting where the various benefits that some colleagues received
were discussed; i.e., graduate or undergraduate assistant, graduate teaching stipend, research
money, salary raise, and course reduction, as opposed to the lack of benefits other colleagues
received. In this meeting I felt privileged to be included among those who should receive such
benefits. Never before had my position and situation within the department been rewarded. I
quickly learned my feelings were nave.
8/2/2019 Black Woman Professor Published Version
14/28
Black Woman Professor, by T. O. Patton; published 2004 in The Howard Journal ofCommunications 15(3), 185-200
14
I sure hope we will receive benefits comparable to Ryans3
(a Black male). I wonder, didRyan really deserve the benefits he received? Did they really deserve the benefits they
received?
As Susan, a White female, speaks, she looks at me, as do others who are attending the same
meeting. In an instant I am transformed from being included to being Black, and therefore,
excluded. Did they really deserve the benefits theyreceived? (italics mine). I am an outsider-
within.
In analyzing the above experience, if we problematize the notion of racism and sexism
through the idea of belonging; i.e. border crossing, we are left with the paradox of the outsider
withinboth belonging and disenfranchisement simultaneously. The notion of outsider within
becomes a hegemonic category for organizing the institutional and cultural apparatus with its
regulations and cultural functions for maintenance of the status quo. I am caught up in the
politics of domination and colonizationthe same politics that allow my skin color to become
more visible than my gender. In this moment, I am not only an outsider within, but I am
ultimately an essentialized being. I am marked and fixed into either/or categories. According to
Hall (1996), The essentializing moment is weak because it naturalizes and dehistoricizes
difference, mistaking what is historical and cultural for what is natural, biological, and genetic
(p. 472). Because essentialization has been allowed to occur through the maintenance of
hegemony, my skin color now supercedes any female bonding or so-called sisterhood. I have
been rendered the visible invisible.
The politics of domination and colonization allow me to be reduced, my unique
characteristics obscured, and differences concealed. As P. H. Collins (1998) pointed out
3All names in this essay have been changed.
8/2/2019 Black Woman Professor Published Version
15/28
Black Woman Professor, by T. O. Patton; published 2004 in The Howard Journal ofCommunications 15(3), 185-200
15
Relying on the visibility of African-American women to generate the invisibility ofexclusionary practices of racial segregation, this new politics produces remarkably
consistent Black female disadvantage while claiming to do the opposite (p. 14).
According to hooks (1989), as subjects, people have the right to define their own reality,
establish their own identities, name their history. As objects, ones reality is defined by others,
ones identity created by others, ones history named only in ways that define ones relationship
to those who are subject (p. 42-43). Patton (2000) finds that those who define only mark
themselves by what they are not, which contributes to the normalization or naturalization of
whiteness as something not diverse and invisible. Non-whites become the marked, visible other.
Further there is retention of power because the definer is never marked (p. 38).
The power to mark the body comes from those who have the power to represent. Groups
who are able to retain and maintain the hegemonic order have the power to mark, classify,
assign, and represent those others. According to Hall (1997), Power, it seems, has to be
understood here, not only in terms of economic exploitations and physical coercion, but also in
broader cultural or symbolic terms, including the power to represent someone or something in a
certain waywithin a certain regime of representation (p. 259). Thus, the politics of
domination and representation become played out on the body in favor of retaining the current
hegemonic order. It is this naturalization of domination whether in terms of classism, racism,
sexism etc. that allows hegemony to not only be widespread, but a lso appear natural and
inevitable (Hall, 1997, p. 259). Therefore, by its very nature, the university recreates the
hegemonic order and contributes to the reification of disenfranchised persons because it operates
by constructing and has constructed an impassable boundarythe outsider within.
The power of this impassable boundary seems to come not only from the current
construction of hegemony, which privileges Whiteness above all else, but also from the
8/2/2019 Black Woman Professor Published Version
16/28
Black Woman Professor, by T. O. Patton; published 2004 in The Howard Journal ofCommunications 15(3), 185-200
16
ideological construction of the naturalized privilege of whiteness. It is this ideological
construction that makes the imagining of academe as accepting and welcoming a place
fraught with disenfranchisement, marginalization, and adherence to the status quo. Thus, like the
colonizers gaze, attempts to fix and mark, and naturalize the difference between the centered
and the disenfranchised occur frequently.
Narrative Two: Gender and Race
This second narrative is an example of the intersectionality of gender and race in the
organization. Wayne, a White male, felt he could advance his patriarchal White supremacist
dominance without any repercussions because of the organizational structure that seemingly
condones such domination. In a casual hallway conversation with another colleague, Wayne
decided to tell me what he thought of my research: Clearly my research is counter to and
challenges his White supremacist patriarchal worldview. At the end of this confrontation Wayne
struck me with a heavy object. Nobody cares about race, racism. None of it matters. If you
want to succeed you better learn how to compromise your values. You had better sell your soul.
Your research contributes nothing. You need to lay low and just be silent.
I informed my department chairperson of what occurred and the fact that I was stuck and
she/he said, Thats just Waynes quirky sense of humor. He is a funny guy. When I sought
advice from the director of human resources and diversity, I was told to put up with it, because
youre new and no one at the university will support you. As Aparicio (1999) finds, due to the
underrepresentation of non-White faculty at universities, despite the glacial increase of their
numbers, many [faculty of color] face isolation, racial and gender-based antagonisms, the
devaluation of their research interests and achievements, insufficient mentoring and support
mechanism, and ambivalence about their academic authority (n. p.).
8/2/2019 Black Woman Professor Published Version
17/28
Black Woman Professor, by T. O. Patton; published 2004 in The Howard Journal ofCommunications 15(3), 185-200
17
The environment created is one that is hostile and degrading and one that supports White
supremacy and, in this case, patriarchy. It is an environment in which devaluation can be
dismissed as humor. It is an environment that is complicitous with Waynes call for me to just
be silent. It is an environment that reminds me that I do not belong. It is a university
environment that as Luz Reyes and Halcon (1991) argued, mirrors the same attitudes and
generalities about cultural/racial differences that plague larger society (p. 171). It is an
environment where faculty of color continue to report experiences of subtle discrimination in
the workplace, such as seeing their work devalued if it focuses on minority issues (Turner &
Myers, 2000, p. 22). Furthermore, subtle but pervasive discrimination indicates that I am a threat
to the status quo. According to A. C. Collins (2001), the academy provides a chilly environment
for Black women students, faculty, and administrators. The environment of the academy for the
most part, is unreceptive, unsupportive, and lacks in understanding and sensitivity to issues that
affect Black women (p. 38).
While any organizational member, at some level, will become acculturated or integrated
into the organizational climate and culture, one maintains her/his own identity as well as
interacts within the organizational climate and culture. The statement sell your soul in the
above quote refers most directly to assimilation. The assimilationist view as Yep (1998)
described directs the marginalized person to try harder and harder to adhere, obey, and follow
the rules of the dominant grouprules that he or she can never fully and completely participate
in creating (p. 80).
In addition, the strategy of assimilation invoked by sell your soul is deeply rooted in
White supremacy and advocates a negation of anything counter to the maintenance of the White
supremacist hegemonic order. Sell your soul refers not only to assimilation into the
8/2/2019 Black Woman Professor Published Version
18/28
Black Woman Professor, by T. O. Patton; published 2004 in The Howard Journal ofCommunications 15(3), 185-200
18
organization, but also is an attempt to mark, maintain, fix and naturalize the difference between
belongingness and otherness. Belongingness necessitates maintenance of the current hegemonic
order. Any challenge to the status quo, which might cause one to reflect upon her/his complicity
with the status quo, must be denied and the internalized gaze must be reflected, turned outward,
away from the self; hence the objectified gaze maintains the current hegemonic order. The
representations of other through the White supremacist lens not only maintain the White
supremacist hegemonic order, but also the representations render whiteness invisible. Whiteness
is deemed rational and acceptable, and non-whiteness irrational and non-acceptable. Thus, the
dance between the spectator and the spectacle continues.
Narrative Three: Modern Racism
This White supremacist discourse is one that is not new, but is one that is cloaked in
modernism. As Giroux (1992) explains,
Modernist discourse in various forms rarely engages how white authority is inscribed and
implicated in the creation and reproduction of a society in which the voices of the center
appear either invisible or unimplicated in the historical and social construction of racism
as an integral part of their own collective identity. (p. 116)
This invisible or modern racism is one in which the subtle manifestations of racism are covert,
and seemingly more difficult to prove because they are naturalized.
No longer are hate-filled faces a part of public displays at predominantly white
institutions, nor are pictures of elected officials barring the entrance of African American
students. Blatant rules excluding minorities from facilities of predominantly whiteuniversitiesas Harvard excluded the eminent W.E.B. DuBoisare no longer on the
books. Overt racism has gone underground, out of the glare of the journalists and the
television cameras that captured the raw emotions of the civil rights movement in the
1960s. (Turner & Myers, 2000, p. 11)
8/2/2019 Black Woman Professor Published Version
19/28
Black Woman Professor, by T. O. Patton; published 2004 in The Howard Journal ofCommunications 15(3), 185-200
19
A more expansive term for covert racism is inferential racism. As Fiske (1996) described,
inferential racism is ultimately more dangerous [than overt forms of racism], not only because it
is harder to identify, but because it is often exerted by liberals with an explicitly antiracist intent.
Inferential racism is the necessary form of racism in a society of white supremacy [or an
organization] that proclaims itself non-racist (p. 37). Therefore, underlying inferential racism is
the belief of power, privilege, and representation which reconfirms the White hegemonic order.
Thus, the co-creation of identity cannot occur when there is an attempt on the part of one of the
communicators to, consciously or unconsciously, dominate the other physically or symbolically
(Yep, 1998, p. 81). Further, fictive ideas within the politics of identitythe idea that one ethnic
or racial group supercedes anotherbecome naturalized and normalized within White
supremacist hegemonic domination. A problematization of this magnitude can be explicitly seen
in the example below.
In a meeting Bill, a White male, decided to veer from the scheduled agenda to lecture
those in attendance about how he saw issues of discrimination in the department. Anyone who
thinks that there is discrimination in this department in wrong. Bill stops and stares and me. I
am the only Black person in the room. His face reddening, a finger waving and pointing at me,
he yells, There is no discrimination in this department! Nobody stopped Bills tirade. I was
silent and silenced. I was fearful of speaking. I did not want to lend legitimacy to anything that
was being said by Bill. I felt that if I said something, the others might think there is a kernel of
truth to what is being said. At the same time, I was complicitous in the maintenance of
hegemony because I did not speak out, thus legitimizing Bills discourse. McGee (1998)
referenced issues of silence in the political realm. Silence in this arena can signify assent or the
inability to answer an argument; his point can thus be applied to hegemony and the maintenance
8/2/2019 Black Woman Professor Published Version
20/28
Black Woman Professor, by T. O. Patton; published 2004 in The Howard Journal ofCommunications 15(3), 185-200
20
of the hegemonic order because the goal is to maintain the status quo. Furthermore, the internal
dynamics and regulations of a social system are apt to keep that system intact unless a conscious
effort is made to change that system (McGee, 1998, p. 216). Thus, I exercised my agency not
through my voice, but through actionI made my invisible/visible presence seen by standing up
and leaving the meeting. Nicotera (1999) also ponders the issue of silence.
Why couldnt I break the silence? Then it became clear: To break the silence is to becomplicit in the discourse that first created it; it reifies the practice of attack and
counterattack. I do not know how to break the silence in a way that breaks the discursive
cycle of casting myself as victim and my attackers as predator. My conception of
breaking silence as leaving myself open to a new attack was framed by the discursivecycle. It became clear why transcending a discursive cycle is so difficult: To be silent is
complicit; to break silence is complicit. (p. 450)
The above situation, as well as the others described, beg the question of how do we
undermine or challenge hegemony in a way that the White supremacist, essentialist,
marginalizing gaze is shifted without further risk to cultural, political, and socially
disenfranchised people. It is this shifting that is not condoned nor permitted, lest the Euro
American gaze which has been directed outward toward those who are not White nor male be
directed inward. Further, it is the resistance in shifting that may allow the experiences of
disenfranchised people to cross the border, but it does not mean that their experience will be
brought into full view or centered. As Davis (1998) questioned:
How much more informed are we of the ways of Black women and other oppressed groupssymbolically create and negotiate their worlds? How do our methods of critical inquiry resist
the appropriation of oppressed voices in scholarship? Are scholars willing to explore de-
centering our knowledge claims from a white, male patriarchal system to embrace the
multiple consciousness of knowledge from marginal groups and, thus, examine multipleepistemologies and ontologies? Will critics find ways to explicate the rhetoric of oppressed
people and their responses to dominant discourses? (p. 78)
Further, by what means does the White supremacist gaze turn inward? What makes this turn
happen? These questions can be best addressed by the theory of articulation.
8/2/2019 Black Woman Professor Published Version
21/28
Black Woman Professor, by T. O. Patton; published 2004 in The Howard Journal ofCommunications 15(3), 185-200
21
Re-articulating the Academy
It is of no use for us to sit with our hands folded, hanging our heads like bulrushes,
lamenting our wretched condition; but let us make a mighty effort, and arise; and if no
one will promote or respect us, let us promote and respect ourselves. (Maria W. Stewart,
as cited in Green, 2001, p. 208)
Through my personal experiences in academia this study revealed the ways in which
body has become the site of gender and race struggle in the academy. These micro experiences
allow for a macro discussion regarding racism and sexism in academe. The way these three
narratives have become articulated within the institution reinforce Dziech and Hawkins (1998)
claim that whether it is an extension of ora reaction against its history, an institutions present
always reflects its past, and that past influences [the institution] profoundly (p. 560). The power
of the articulated moment is seen in the on-going struggle of language used as a means of
gaining or maintaining power. According to Giroux (1993), language is situated in an on-going
struggle over issues of inclusion and exclusion, meaning and interpretation, and such issues are
inextricably related to questions of power, history, and self identity (p. 161). Therefore, the
manner in which gender and race are articulated in the academy has the ability to reify the
current hegemonic order or challenge hegemony. How marginalized bodies are articulated
depends greatly on whether normative behavior is challenged.
The theory of articulation speaks to the necessity in understanding the limits of our
language and the implications not only with regard to race/racism, but also as it concerns culture
and ethnocentrism, sexism, and socio-economic status. Giroux (1993) elaborated on the meaning
of the theory: It means understanding the limits of our own language as well as the implications
of the social practices we construct on the basis of the language we use to exercise authority and
power. It means developing a language that can question public form, address social injustices,
and break the tyranny of the present (p. 28). Because inclusion, exclusion, language and
8/2/2019 Black Woman Professor Published Version
22/28
Black Woman Professor, by T. O. Patton; published 2004 in The Howard Journal ofCommunications 15(3), 185-200
22
meaning are inextricably bound to questions of racism, sexism, and hegemony, what is needed is
a new, oppositional paradigm. An oppositional paradigm is created through the theory of
articulation because through this theory it becomes possible to deconstruct and challenge
dominant relations of power and knowledge legitimated in traditional forms ofdiscourse
(Giroux, 1993, p. 167).
According to Slack (1997) theoretically, articulation can be understood as a way of
characterizing a social formation without falling into the twin traps of reductionism and
essentialism (p. 112). Therefore, how is it that experience within the academy can be articulated
and expressed in such a way that challenges complicity and, at the same time, avoids the traps of
reductionism and essentialism? Interrogating or challenging White supremacist hegemony in
academe requires a critical examination of how the institution is dis/empowering based upon
how the status quo is articulated and how the institution might be re-articulated. In order to
remedy this, Giroux (1992) suggested examining the socially constructed boundaries of race and
power that would, make visible how whiteness functions as a historical and social construction
(p. 117). Similarly Patton (2000) maintained that in marking whiteness, society dismantles the
hegemonic order from the top-down hierarchical order in which Whites are on top and non-
Whites are on the bottom, and replaces it with a more horizontal order in which one racial group
is not privileged above the rest (p. 38). Hall (1985) found that thinking articulation thus
becomes a practice of thinking [of] unity and difference [as] difference in complex unity, without
becoming a hostage to the privileging of difference as such (p. 93). In hegemonic construction
we, therefore, must think of society as a) complex, but b) that while contradictory ways exist
they need not be thought of as better or worse than the otherthe so-called inferior other need
8/2/2019 Black Woman Professor Published Version
23/28
Black Woman Professor, by T. O. Patton; published 2004 in The Howard Journal ofCommunications 15(3), 185-200
23
not be invented to justify existence and survival; and c) it is not simply about unity because unity
can erase cultural differences. It is about solidarity, a common set of struggles.
Is solidarity possible? Is a shift in the center possible? A shift within the center is a direct
challenge to the current hegemonic order. This shift not only challenges the top-down
hierarchical order and replaces it with a more horizontal order, but it also allows us to realize and
recognize that culture is shared and the unquestioned center should be contested. With this in
mind, then, a critical examination of power can ensue. It also raises an important question: Is a
White supremacist patriarchal hegemonic institution interested in re-articulating? In light of
the oppression against women and ethnic minorities, will the institution throw off the cloak of
complicity in which the hegemonic order is invested? When struggle, perseverance, and
enlightenment is no longer made on the backs of women and non-White bodies perhaps that will
mean other standpoints have been or can be embraced. Just as an aspect of feminist standpoint
theory seeks to expose both acts of oppression and acts of resistance by asking disenfranchised
persons to describe and discuss their experiences with hope that their knowledge will reveal
otherwise unexposed aspects of the social order (B. J. Allen et al. 1999, p. 409), the theory of
articulation can be employed in the same manner. The theory of articulation links and examines
issues of disenfranchisement, as they are interdependent with the hegemony, language, and
action that articulated their subject positions. To establish a womans and ethnic minority
womans standpoint is to prepare to challenge academic hegemony. However, as Flores and
Moon (2002) correctly pointed out, so long as desires are imbued with notions of superiority
and domination, attempts to destabilize race [and other marginalizations] will fail (p. 200).
Articulation challenges hegemony through an oppositional gaze. Giroux (1993) noted that
oppositional paradigms provide new languages through which it becomes possible to
8/2/2019 Black Woman Professor Published Version
24/28
Black Woman Professor, by T. O. Patton; published 2004 in The Howard Journal ofCommunications 15(3), 185-200
24
deconstruct and challenge dominant relations of power and knowledge legitimated in traditional
forms of discourse (Giroux, 1993, p. 167). Oppositional paradigms create the possibility for
rearticulation to occur, thus shifting the current hegemonic order.
The issue of racism and sexism in academe gains heightened importance particularly as
positionality of the outsider-within not only remains entrenched, but also continues to produce
and present numerous challenges and consequences. We need to recognize that alternative
representations are necessary. Just as McLaren (1995) stated that pedagogical practice must be
reimagined, so too must academe be reimaged in terms of racism and sexism lest we complicitly
choose to remain adrift in the reproduction of dominant ideology. We must begin to produce new
ways of thinking that involve deconstructing and dismantling the current hegemonic order and
beginning to rebuild, reconstruct, and rearticulate the academy in inclusive and transformative
ways.
We are at a critical juncture in academe. The possibilities for reimagining and re-
articulating a radically different institution come both from the disenfranchised and from the
centered. It is through their standpoints, language, action, and oppositional gaze that we can
enable ourselves to challenge the current constructions of racism and sexism in academe in order
to embrace a critical, transformative, and liberated vision. Academia can be both enlightening
and oppressive. It is not enough to have the disenfranchised included in such way as to make
their contributions, their voices, and their perspectives ineffective and silenced because of the
maintenance of hegemony or allow them to border-cross when it benefits those in the center. Of
all places, academia should be a profession that is a marketplace for the exchange of diverse
ideas, diverse perspectives, and education in the value of difference.
8/2/2019 Black Woman Professor Published Version
25/28
Black Woman Professor, by T. O. Patton; published 2004 in The Howard Journal ofCommunications 15(3), 185-200
25
References
Allen, B. J., Orbe, M. P., & Olivas, M. R. (1999). The complexity of our tears: Dis/enchantment
and (in)difference in the academy. Communication Theory, 9 (4), 402-429.
Allen, W. R. (1992). The color of success: African-American college student outcomes atpredominantly White and historically Black public colleges and universities. Harvard
Educational Review, 62, 26-44.
Aparicio, F. R. (1999). Through my lens: A video project about women of color faculty at the
University of Michigan. Feminist Studies. Accessed at:http://www.findarticles.com/cf_0/m0300/1_25/54955662/print.jhtml
Asante, M. K. (1998). Identifying racist language: Linguistic acts and signs. In M. L. Hecht
(Ed.), Communicating prejudice (pp. 87-98). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Collins, A. C. (2001). Black women in the academy: An historical overview. In R.O. Mabokela& A. L. Green (Eds.), Sisters of the academy: Emergent Black women scholars in higher
education (pp. 29-41). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
Collins, P.H. (1986). Learning from the outsider within: The sociological significance of black
feminist thought. Social Problems, 33, 14-32.
Collins, P. H. (1991).Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of
empowerment. New York: Routledge.
Cottle, S. (2000). Introduction media research and ethnic minorities: Mapping the field. In S.
Cottle (Ed.),Ethnic minorities and the media: Changing cultural boundaries (pp. 2-30).Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Davis, O. I. (1998). A Black woman as rhetorical critic: Validating self and violating the space of
otherness. Womens Studies in Communication, 21 (1), 77-90.
Deetz, S., & Mumby, D. K. (1990). Power, discourse, and the workplace: Reclaiming the critical
tradition. In J. Anderson (ed.), Communication Yearbook, 13 (pp. 18-47). ThousandOaks, CA: Sage.
Dziech, B. & Hawkins, M. (1998). Sexual harassment in higher education. New York, NY:
Garland Publishing.
Fairclough, N. (1998).Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Fiske, J. (1996).Media Matters: Race and gender in U.S. politics. Minneapolis: University ofMinnesota Press.
http://www.findarticles.com/cf_0/m0300/1_25/54955662/print.jhtmlhttp://www.findarticles.com/cf_0/m0300/1_25/54955662/print.jhtml8/2/2019 Black Woman Professor Published Version
26/28
Black Woman Professor, by T. O. Patton; published 2004 in The Howard Journal ofCommunications 15(3), 185-200
26
Flores, L. A., & Moon, D. (2002). Rethinking race, revealing dilemmas: Imagining a new racialsubject inRace Traitor. Western Journal of Communication, 66(2), 181-207.
Frye, M. (2001). Oppression. In M. L. Andersen, & P. H. Collins (Eds.),Race, class, and gender,
(4th
ed., pp. 48-52). Belmont, CA:Wadsworth.
Geist, P. (Ed.). (1999). Surreal illusions, genuine realities: Disenchantment and renewal in the
academyIntroduction [Guest editor]. Communication Theory, 9(4).
Gilroy, P. (1996). The Black Atlantic: Modernity and double consciousness. Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
Giroux, H. A. (1992).Border crossings: Cultural workers and the politics of education. New
York: Routledge.
Giroux, H. A. (1993).Living dangerously: Multiculturalism and the politics of difference. New
York: Peter Lang.
Gledhill, C. (1997). Genre and gender: The case of soap opera. In S Hall (Ed.), Representation:Cultural representations and signifying practices (pp. 337-384). London: Sage
Publications.
Gramsci, A. (1992). Prison notebooks (Vol. 1). New York: Columbia University Press.
Green, A. L. (2001). Epilogue: Leaving a lasting impression. In R.O. Mabokela & A. L. Green
(Eds.), Sisters of the academy: Emergent Black women scholars in higher education (pp.206-208). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
Gregory, S. (1999).Black women in the Academy: The secrets to success and achievement. NewYork: University Press of America.
Hall, S. (1985). Signification, representation, ideology: Althusser and the post structuralistdebates. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 2 (2), 91-114.
Hall, S. (1997). The spectacle of the other. In S. Hall (Ed.),Representation: Cultural
representations and signifying practices (pp. 223-290). London: Sage.
Hall, S. (1996). What is this black in black popular culture? In D. Morley & K.H. Chen (Eds.),
Stuart Hall: Critical dialogues in cultural studies (pp. 465-475). London: Routledge.
hooks, b. (1984). Feminist theory: From margin to center. Boston: South End Press.
hooks, b. (1989). Talking back: Thinking feminist, thinking black. Boston: South End Press.
8/2/2019 Black Woman Professor Published Version
27/28
Black Woman Professor, by T. O. Patton; published 2004 in The Howard Journal ofCommunications 15(3), 185-200
27
Luz Reyes, M. de la, & Halcon, J. J. (1991). Practices of the academy: Barriers to access forChicano academics. In P. G. Altbach & K. Lomotey (Eds)., The racial crisis in Americanhigher education (pp. 167-186). Albany: State University of New York Press.
McLaren, P. (1995). Critical pedagogy and predatory culture: Oppositional politics in a
postmodern era. New York: Routledge.
McGee, B. R. (1998). Speaking about the Other: W.E.B. Du Bois responds to the Klan. Southern
Communication Journal, 63 (3), 208-219.
National Center for Educational Statistics (2000a). Fast facts [On-line]. U.S. Department ofEducation. Available: http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts
National Center for Educational Statistics (2000b). Fast facts [On-line]. U.S. Department ofEducation. Available: http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2002/2002160.pdf
National Center for Educational Statistics (2000c). Fast facts [On-line]. U.S. Department ofEducation. Available: http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2002/digest2001/tables/dt225.asp
Nicotera, A. M. (1999). The woman academic as subject/object/self: Dismantling the illusion of
duality. Communication Theory, 9 (4), 430-464.
Omi, M., & Wiant, H. (1994).Racial formation in the United States: From the 1960s to the
1990s (2nd
ed.). New York: Routledge.
Patton, T. O. (2004). In the guise of civility: The complicitous maintenance of inferential forms
of sexism and racism in higher education. Womens Studies in Communication, 27(1),
60-87.
Patton, T. O. (2000). Mixed messages and complicitous policy: Reconstructing diversity
requirements through coherenceDissertation Abstracts International, 61 (02), 427A(UMI No. AAT 9961773)
Sadker, M. (1994).Failing at fairness: How Americas schools cheat girls. New York: C.
Scribners Sons.
Sartwell, C. (1998).Act like you know: African-American autobiography and white identity.
Chicago: The Chicago University Press.
Slack, J. D. (1997). The theory and method of articulation in cultural studies. In D. Morley &
K.H. Chen (Eds.), Stuart Hall: Critical dialogues in cultural studies (pp. 112-127).
London: Routledge.
Turner, C.S.V., & Myers, S. L. (2000). Faculty of color in academe: Bittersweet success.
Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
http://nces.ed.gov/fastfactshttp://nces.ed.gov/pubs2002/2002160.pdfhttp://nces.ed.gov/pubs2002/digest2001/tables/dt225.asphttp://nces.ed.gov/pubs2002/digest2001/tables/dt225.asphttp://nces.ed.gov/pubs2002/2002160.pdfhttp://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts8/2/2019 Black Woman Professor Published Version
28/28
Black Woman Professor, by T. O. Patton; published 2004 in The Howard Journal ofCommunications 15(3), 185-200
28
Wellman, D. (1999). Transforming received categories: Discovering cross-border identities andother subversive activities. In C. Clark and J. ODonnell (Eds.),Becoming andunbecoming white: Owning and disowning a racial identity (pp. 78-91). Westport, CT:
Bergin & Garvey.
Williams, C. (2001). The angry black woman scholar.NWSA Journal, 13 (2), 87-97.
Yep, G. A. (1998). My three cultures: Navigating the multicultural identity landscape. In J. N.Martin, T. K. Nakayama, & L. A. Flores (Eds.),Readings in cultural contexts (pp. 79-
84). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.