Download - Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Transcript
Page 1: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)
Page 2: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

CASE PRESENTATION

BY : DR MUHAMMAD UMAR NISARPGT (SURGERY)

Page 3: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

PATIENT: XYZ AGE: 50YRS GENDER: FEMALE RESIDENCE: sarghoda D.O.A: 27-07-2015

05/01/2023 3

PATIENT PROFILE :

Page 4: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

known diabetic – 16 years

Off and on Pain in RHC – 03 years Off and on nausea/ vomiting - 03 years

05/01/2023 4

Presenting complaints:

Page 5: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

PAST HX: C section – 1 year back

SYSTEMIC HX: FAMILY HX: NAD PERSONAL HX:

Page 6: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

50 years Old lady lying comfortabely in bed well oriented in time place and person.

B.P : 130/80 mmHg Pulse : 82/min Temp : Afebrile R.R : 19/min

Examination

Page 7: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Pallor : absent Cyanosis : absent Jaundice : absent Thyroid : not enlarge Edema : absent Lymph node : not palpable

Page 8: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Chest: CNS CVS

Abdomen:◦ Soft ◦ Non tender ◦ No visceromegaly◦ BS present

Examination

NAD

Page 9: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Labs Blood CP :

◦ Hb = 11.6 mg/dl , ◦ WBC,s = 6.21 X 109/l ◦ Platelets = 177x 109 /l

RFTs = WNL LFTs = WNL BSR= 16.1mmol/l

Urine RE= Normal

05/01/2023 9

Page 10: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Ultrasound Abdomen Chest XRAY

CholelithiasisNormal study

Page 11: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Open cholecystectomy was done on 29-07-2015

Abdomen was opened via right upper transverse incision

Per op findings were thick walled gall bladder and omental adhesions

Cystic artery ligated Cystic duct tied Gall bladder was removed Homeostasis secured, abdomen closed

Surgery

Page 12: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Patient was stable vitally Abdomen was soft and there was

tenderness at wound site Patient was discharged 2 days after surgery

Post op

Page 13: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Patient presented again in emergency on 5th Aug 2015 with C/O ◦ Pain RHC ◦ Abdominal distention◦ Nausea and anorexia ◦ Yellowish discoloration of sclera◦ Clay colored stool and dark color urine

GPE:◦ Anemia : present◦ Jaundice : present

Page 14: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Abdomen◦ Rt upper transverse scar of cholecystectomy◦ Distended ◦ Tender◦ Guarding ◦ BS +ve

Page 15: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Blood CP : ◦ Hb = 8.6 g/dl , ◦ WBC,s = 16.21 X 109/l ◦ Platelets = 442x 109 /l

RFTs = ◦ Urea: 18.4mmol/l◦ Creat: 314 mmol/l

LFTs = ◦ Bili: 55 umol/l

BSR= 252 mg/dl

Coagulation profile: WNL

Serum Amylase: WNL

labs

Page 16: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Abdomen was opened via previous scar. Suction of almost 2L of bile was done. Per op findings were transected CBD at

cystic duct level with proximal stump of about 3-4cm from confluence and distal stump was approx 2-3 cm.

Peritoneal cavity washed with 8L of fluid. CBD stent placed inside the CBD and end to

end anastomosis done with vicryl 6/0. Drains placed in RHC and in Pelvis. Abdomen closed ASD done

Re-exploration

Page 17: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Kept in ICU for 2 days and in ward for 8 days with daily output in RHC drain of 500-800ml

Thus the patient is considered to be managed on the lines of controlled biliary fistula

Discharged on 12th POD with RHC drain in place

Advised follow up after 2 weeks First post op visit:

◦ Daily output in drain= 400-600ml◦ Abd: soft, non tender◦ LFTs: bili- 26 umol/l◦ Coag : WNL

Post op

Page 18: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

IATROGENIC BILE DUCT INJURIES

Page 19: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Bile duct injuries represent a complex clinical scenario seen with increased frequency owing to ◦aberrant anatomy◦more lap cholecystectomies being performed

Incidence : ◦0.1-0.2 % in open cholecystectomy◦0.4-0.6 % in lap cholecystectomy

Page 20: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

HISTORY

Page 21: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Earliest known gall stones - Priestess of Arnan (1085-945 BC) – Egyptian

The first clinical description of gallstone disease - Gordon Taylor, in his description of the symptoms manifested by Alexander the Great in 323 BC

Page 22: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

John Stough Bobbs - first elective cholecystostomy in Indianapolis for hydrops of the gallbladder

In  1878 Kocher drained an empyema of gallbladder.

Page 23: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Ludwig George Courvoisier (1843-1918).◦Law (Statistical

article on the pathology and surgery of the biliary system)

◦First choledocholithotomy

Page 24: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

First open cholecystectomy

•Dr Carl Johann August Langenbuch (German surgeon)

•July 15, 1882, at Lazarus

Krankenhaus in Berlin

Page 25: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Hans Kehr – invented a T tube

First laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Erich Mühe in Germany in 1985

Page 26: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

REVIEW ON SURGICAL ANATOMY

Page 27: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)
Page 28: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

The cranial segments : cystic artery and the hepatic arteries, especially the right (R) hepatic artery.

The caudal segment:pancreaticoduodenal artery through the retroduodenal artery.

The middle segment :is vascularized by an axial network of a varying number of arterial anastomoses between the cranial and caudal supplies.

Blood supply of CBD

Page 29: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

60% by the distal vessels

38% by the cranial ones

2% by a nonaxial supply from common hepatic artery

This arterial pattern predisposes the supraduodenal segment of the common bile duct to ischemic damage and resulting

in strictures.

CBD blood supply

Page 30: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

space bordered by:

◦ Cystic duct inferiorly,

◦ Common hepatic

artery medially

◦ Superior border of the cystic artery

Calot’s triangle(Cystohepatic triangle)

Page 31: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Variations in cystic duct

Page 32: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)
Page 33: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Iatrogenic injury Cholecystectomy Gastrectomy Pancreatectomy ERCP

Trauma

Bile Duct Injuries (BDI)

Page 34: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Inflammation in the porta,Variable biliary anatomy, Inappropriate exposure,Aggressive attempts at hemostasis,Surgeon inexperience. 97% due to visual misperception, only 3% accounts for

technical skills and knowledge.

Risk factors

Page 35: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Misperception .. With sufficient cephalad retraction of the gall

bladder fundus ,the cystic duct overlies the common hepatc duct running in a parrellel path. without inferolateral traction of the gallbladder infundibulum to dossociate this structures, the dissection of apparent cystic duct may actually include CBD…

Page 36: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Acute inflammation and scarring of the triangle of calot.

Acute cholecystitis. Acute pancreatitis. Chronic cholecystitis. Mirizzi syndrome Perforated duodenal ulcer.

Complicated pathology

Page 37: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Cephalad and lateral retraction of gall bladder is necessary to expose the structures.

Cautious retraction in case of acute inflammation or gangrenous gall bladder.

Avoid application of clips too close to the cystic duct CBD junction.

Technical errors

Page 38: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Avoid strenous dissection too close to the CBD.

Blind application of clips to achieve hemostasis.

Willingness to convert to open technique.

Early in the surgeons learning curve.

Page 39: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Use of electrocautery Avoided near the CBD Bipolar cautery is better. Avoid usage near metallic clips Low intensity for short duration

Thermal and laser injuries

Page 40: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

CLASSIFICATION

Page 41: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Era of Open Chole

Based upon level of biliary strictures with respect to hepatic bifurcation

Type 1-5.

Helps surgeon choose appropriate site for repair

Bismuth classification (1982)

Page 42: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)
Page 43: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

A drawback of the Bismuth classification is that patients with limited strictures, isolated right hepatic duct strictures, or cystic duct leaks cannot be classified

Page 44: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Strasberg classification is able to classify all types of injury and is used extensively in describing bile duct injuries associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Page 45: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

BL from minor duct◦ Cystic duct leak◦ Liver bed leak◦Accessory duct leak

Communication between liver and duodenum via major ducts unaffected

Type A

Page 46: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Occlusion of the part of biliary tree

Usually due to Rt abberant duct ligature

May be segmental,sectorial, main RHD

Type B

Page 47: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Transection of aberrant right hepatic ducts

Similar to B but…

Presents and treated differently from B

Type C

Page 48: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Lateral injury to main extrahepatic bile ducts

Similar to A◦Bile collection

Dissimilar to A◦Location on the main biliary tree

◦Consequences more severe RHD, CHD, CBD may be involved

Type D

Page 49: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

E: injury to main duct (Bismuth) E1: Transection >2cm from confluence

E2: Transection <2cm from confluence

E3: Transection in hilum E4: Seperation of major ducts in hilum

E5: Type C plus injury in hilum

Type E

Page 50: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

McMahon

Amsterdam Academic Medical Center's classification (1996)

Neuhaus' classification (2000)

Csendes' classification (2001)

CUHK (Chinese University of Hong Kong), 2007

Other classifications

Page 51: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

What are the clinical features ?

Page 52: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

The common clinical symptoms are jaundice, fever, chills, and epigastric pain.

divided into two groups.

patients with bile leaks, If the subhepatic region is not drained, subhepatic bile collection (biloma) or abscess develops. ◦ fever, abdominal pain and other signs of sepsis

occur. ◦ Generally, jaundice is not observed in these

patients because cholestasis does not appear.

patients with biliary strictures, jaundice is the commonest clinical symptom caused by cholestasis .

Page 53: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Is it possible to detect these injuries intra operatively?

Page 54: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Fletcher et al. in 1999 found that intraoperative cholangiography had a protective effect for complications of cholecystectomy in a retrospective study of 19,000 cholecystectomies.

Routine intraoperative cholangiography

Page 55: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Cholangiogram abnormalities:◦Failure to opacify the proximal hepatic ducts◦Narrowing of the CBD at the site of cholangiogram catheter insertion

Bile drainage:◦Drainage of bile from any location other than a lacerated gallbladder

◦Bile draining from a tubular structure

Intraoperative clues to a bile duct injury

Page 56: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Clipped duct is not fully encompassed by a standard clip (9mm)

Presence of another unexpected ductal structure

A large artery (RHA) behind the duct

Extra lymphatic &vascular structure seen

Proximal hepatic ducts fail to opacify on IOC

Suspect CBD, not cystic duct, if..

Page 57: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

◦Second cystic artery, this may be the right hepatic artery

◦Lymphatics surrounding the duct or more tissue around the cystic duct than is usually encountered, this indicates that the dissection is in the porta

◦Fibrous tissue in the gallbladder bed, indicates transection of the proximal hepatic ducts

Anomalous anatomy:

Page 58: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

How to prevent?

Page 59: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Proper selection of cases

In LC of obese patients, place the optical port little higher up from the umbilicus to avoid the tangential view of the Calot’s triangle.

Always dissect to the right of the line joining the right free margin of lesser omentum to cystic node.

Page 60: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

While dissecting the Calot’s triangle stay close to the GB.

It is advised that Calot’s triangle is dissected in such a way that the retro-infundibular window is opened first and then the window between the cystic artery and duct is opened. Visualisation of the double window is called “Critical view of Strasberg”.

Page 61: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

The technique of “critical view of safety” of Strasberg

Calot’s triangle is completely unfolded by mobilizing the gallbladder neck from the gallbladder bed of the liver before transecting the cystic artery and duct

Page 62: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Vessels pulsating before clipping should be considered as hepatic artery until proved otherwise.

While dissecting GB from the liver bed stay close to the GB and avoid any injury to abnormally superficial right anterior sectoral duct.

Page 63: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Once the Calot’s triangle is fully dissected and cystic artery has been clipped and cut, GB is left attached medially to only one structure, CD.

If the plane between the liver and GB is absent, it might be better to leave a part of posterior GB wall adhered to the liver bed and cauterise its mucosa

Page 64: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

The cystic duct and the GB neck and infundibulum together looks like Lord Ganesha’s trunk and head (or elephant’s trunk and head) respectively and so also called as Lord Ganesha’s sign.

Page 65: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

In case of excessive bleeding during the lap surgery:

Have a low threshold for conversion.

If there is continuous ooze from the inflammed surface, liberal irrigation and aspiration should be used.

If there is sudden arterial spurt, compress the area temporary with small gauge or atraumatic grasper. Irrigate / aspirate and clean the operative field. Effectively control the bleeding vessel with left hand grasper, identify the vessel and arrest bleeding with clips or bipolar electrocautery.

Page 66: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

MANAGEMENT

Page 67: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

HOW ESSENTIAL IS TO TREAT BILE DUCT INJURIES?

Page 68: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Most bile duct injuries or strictures occur as a result of cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstone disease.

The majority of these patients are young (40–50 years), female, have a long life expectancy, and are in the most productive years of their life.

Page 69: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Biliary strictures may result in significant morbidity and mortality secondary to complications such as biliary cirrhosis , cholangitis, portal hypertension.

Because of this, it is essential that these patients have prompt recognition of their problem and a reliable treatment with a long-term success rate.

Page 70: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

WHAT ARE THE FACTORS ONE SHOULD CONSIDER BEFORE

TREATING BILE DUCT INJURIES?

Page 71: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

1.Timing of diagnosis ◦ Intra-operative◦ Early post-op ◦ Late post-op

2.Extent and level of injury

3.Patient presentation

4.Hospital setup

Page 72: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

WHAT ARE THE TREATMENT OPTIONS AVAILABLE ?

Page 73: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

1) Surgical Management 2) Interventional Radiologic Techniques 3) Endoscopic Techniques Most of these injuries and strictures are best

repaired surgically. SURGERY - GOLD STANDARD

Page 74: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

A multidisciplinary approach The team consisting of experienced

interventional radiologists, endoscopists, and surgeons, coordinated by an experienced hepatobiliary surgeon

Page 75: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

PRE-OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

Page 76: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Early post-op period Sepsis /SIRS Treat with –Broad spectrum antibiotics -Percutaneous biliary drainage - Percutaneous/operative

drainage of bilomas

No hurry for surgical repair ◦ Friable tissue ◦ Retraction of small ducts

Page 77: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Next step- Pre-op cholangiography (to define anatomy)

Control bile leak with percutaneous stents

Delayed surgical repair

Page 78: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Late post-op period Strictures Cholangitis Treat with- Broad spectrum antibiotics

Urgent cholangiography

Biliary decompression Transhepatic biliary drainage Endoscopic drainage + stent

Surgical repair

Page 79: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

If patient presents only with jaundice & no cholangitis

ERC / PTC - to define anatomy

In these cases biliary decompression has not been demonstrated to improve outcome

Surgical repair

Page 80: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Sahajpal et el retrospective medical record review of 69

patients who underwent repair after LC-BDIs

BDIs were classified into 3 groups based on timing of repair from time of injury.◦ Immediate repair (0-72 hours of LC)◦ Intermediate (between72 hours and 6weeks after

LC)◦ Late (after 6weeks)

Patients who underwent repairs in the intermediate period were at a significantly higher risk of developing biliary stricture

Literature review…

Page 81: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

De Reuver et al investigated the influence of timing of repair on outcome

3 groups of patients were defined.◦ Acute repair: Within 6 weeks ◦ Delayed repair: After 6 weeks ◦ Late Repair:

 Repair in the acute phase after injury is associated with long term stricture formation.

Cont’d….

Page 82: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

INTRA OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

Page 83: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Intra-operatively, any suspicious biliary injury

1) Intra-op cholangiography +/- Careful dissection 2) Lap to open conversion is often

necessary

Isolated, small, non–cautery-based partial lateral bile duct injury Placement of a T tube

Page 84: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Injury involves <50% of the circumference of the bile duct wall

Primary closure over a T-tube

Page 85: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

More extensive biliary injury Significant thermal damage owing to

cautery-based trauma Injury involving >50% of the circumference

of the bile duct wall

End-to-side choledochojejunostomy with a Roux-en-Y loop of jejunum should be performed

Page 86: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

MANAGEMENT OF HEPATIC DUCT INJURIES

Page 87: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Major bile duct injuries, including transections of the common common hepatic duct, can be repaired.

Isolated hepatic ducts smaller than 3 mm or those draining a single hepatic segment can be safely ligated.

Ducts larger than 3 mm are more likely to drain several segments or an entire lobe and need to be reimplanted.

Page 88: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

TECHNICAL ASPECTS OF SURGICAL REPAIR

Page 89: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

The choice and technique of repair correlates with the success rate.

End-to-end anastomosis- The common duct (or common hepatic duct) has been divided and there is sufficient length to perform an end-to-end anastomosis without tension

Page 90: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Unsuccessful :1.When repaired at the initial open cholecystectomy

The reasons for the high failure rate of end-

to-end biliary anastomoses relate to ischemia and tension.

Page 91: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy

Has the best success rate for the repair of a transection injury of CBD/CHD

Page 92: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Certain technical factors for a successful hepaticojejunostomy are

• Preoperative eradication of intra-abdominal infection

• Viable ductal tissue (excise damaged ductal tissue)

• Single-layer mucosa-to-mucosa anastomosis

• Fine, monofilament, absorbable suture• Alleviate tension on the anastomoses

Page 93: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Stenting

Stenting is useful, however, when very small ducts are repaired

For other injuries stenting may not be required.

Page 94: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

OVERVIEW

Page 95: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Suspected CBD injury during lap-cholecystectomy

Intra-op cholangiogram

Partial injury(<30%) Primary repair over T-tube

Extensive injury(>30%) Roux en Y choledochojejunostomy

Complete transection Roux en Y.

Injury to isolated hepatic duct

>3mm Reimplantation or reconstruction by Roux en Y hepaticojejunostomy

<3mm Ligate

Page 96: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Role of Interventional Radiology

Page 97: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Interventional radiologic techniques are useful in patients with bile duct injuries, leaks, or postoperative strictures.

Page 98: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

These techniques allow

1)Percutaneous drainage of abdominal fluid collections

2)Preoperative identification of the ductal anatomy through percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography

3)Stricture dilation with or without placement of palliative stents for bile drainage in the patient whose overall physiologic status precludes a major operation.

Page 99: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

◦Intrahepatic ductal disease

◦ERCP is not possible

◦Adjunct to operative repair in order to assist with identification of the proximal biliary tree for reconstruction and for the dilation of anastomotic strictures

Percutaneous transhepatic biliary dilatation

Page 100: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

ROLE OF ENDOSCOPIC DILATATION IN BILIARY

STRICTURES

Page 101: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Adjunctive option in patents with a dominant extrahepatic stricture causing clinical symptoms.

Requires multiple sessions of dilations

Nonischemic strictures (anastomotic strictures) respond best.

Page 102: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Metalic stents are more durable than plastic stents

Endoscopic dilation also has a low mortality rate, but it has a significant morbidity rate.

Page 103: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Complications following endoscopic biliary interventions:◦Hemobilia◦Bile leak◦Pancreatitis◦Cholangitis ◦Re-stricture

Page 104: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

POST-REPAIR COMPLICATIONS

Page 105: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

1. Cholangitis2. Pancreatitis3. Stent occlusion4. Stent migration5. Ductal perforation6. Restricturing7. Biliary fistula8. Hemobilia

Page 106: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

Surg Clin N Am 90 (2010) 787-802 Surg Clin N Am 88 (2008) 1329-1343 Schwartz's Principles of Surgery, 9e Sabiston Textbook of Surgery, 17e Bailay and love 26th e Ajay K. Sahajpal et al. Arch Surg.

2010;145(8):757-763. de Reuver et al. Ann Surg. 2007;245(5):763-

770.

References

Page 107: Bile Duct Injuries (BDIs)

THANK YOU