Benchmarking for Best Practices
Gemini Consulting
cmpmNR888VbfbpDec92C - 2 -
Objectives
• To review how world-class companies use benchmarking
• To introduce Gemini Consulting’s approach to benchmarking
• To review a real case example—and the benefits that benchmarking can provide to our clients
cmpmNR888VbfbpDec92C - 3 -
Agenda
• The Value of Benchmarking
• Overview of Gemini Benchmarking Activities
• Benchmarking for Best Practices
• Benefits of Benchmarking—Case Examples
cmpmNR888VbfbpDec92C - 4 -
Benchmarking Deals with Uncovering and Implementing Best Demonstrated Practices
A kicker box is always the same width—7.30. It grows vertically. If the text is one line, it is centered within the kicker; if more than one line, it is flush left. Use 14 Point Bold Italic type with punctuation.
“The search for industry best practices that lead to superior performance” —Robert C. Camp
“A surveyor’s marker of previously determined position . . . used as a reference point . . . standard by which something can be measured or judged” —Webster’s Dictionary
“Benchmarking is the continuous process of measuring products, services, and practices against the toughest competitors or those companies recognized as industry leaders”—David T. Kearns, Xerox
Benchmarking establishes how much a company needs to improve to be at world-class levels and is a critical component of the process for getting there.
BENCHMARKING
cmpmNR888VbfbpDec92C - 5 -
60% to 70% of the Largest U.S. Companies Now Have Some Form of a Benchmarking Program in Place
Benchmarking’s popularity is partially driven by the fact that U.S. companies must benchmark to win a Malcolm Baldrige National Quality A
U.S. companies must benchmark to be considered for a Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award.
• Many major companies initiated benchmarking programs in the 1980s:- Motorola - General Motors - Pepsico- Oryx - First Chicago - Weyerhaeuser
- Alcoa - General Electric - Xerox
• Certain companies are perceived to be “best in class” along specific dimensions:
• Kellogg
• Motorola
• Xerox
• IRS• Alcoa
• Leading Japanese manufacturers
• Domino’s Pizza
• L.L. Bean
• American Express• Du Pont• General Electric
• Milliken
• Improving supply chain
• Shortening cycle time from order receipt to delivery
• Boosting productivity in logistics and distribution
• Improving billing procedures• Improving safety• Managing organizational
processes• Cross-functional processes
Benchmark Target FocusBenchmarking Company
BENCHMARKING
cmpmNR888VbfbpDec92C - 6 -
Example: Xerox Used Benchmarking to Face New Market Entrants from Japan
Issues faced during 1980s
• Xerox lost market share to Japanese competitors
• “We did not understand the severity of the competition . . . we were arrogant to think that no one could do anything better than we could”
— David Kearns, Xerox Chairman
BENCHMARKING
Benchmarking process
• Addressed most functions in value chain:
- R&D- Manufacturing and QA- Marketing and product management
- Salesforce- Logistics and purchasing
• Selected best-in-class
regardless of industry, e.g.:- Drug wholesalers- Appliance manufacturer
- Catalogue retailers
Benefits Achieved
• Suppliers reduced by 70%
• Manufacturing costs cut by 50%
• Quality problems cut by 60%
• Accelerated cycle time• Increased market
share
cmpmNR888VbfbpDec92C - 7 -
Example: GE Believes That Its Own Managers Have Much to Learn from Other Companies
• GE scanned companies to find those that achieved faster, sustainable growth:
- Screening out direct competitors and noncomparable companies
- Selecting a few best-in-class examples: AMP, Ford, HP, Amex
• Benchmarking centered on process and management practices, not just functions:
- Emphasizing approaches to optimizing processes (e.g., product introduction, partnering with suppliers)
- Helping GE focus on how to get things done
• GE is using the findings to fine-tune its change process:
- It has now turned its benchmarking learnings into training seminars
BENCHMARKING
cmpmNR888VbfbpDec92C - 8 -
Benchmarking Affords Companies the Opportunity to Make Step Changes in Their Work Processes
Degree ofImprovement
Time
BenchmarkingImprovements
InternalImprovements
BENCHMARKING
cmpmNR888VbfbpDec92C - 9 -
Benchmarking Also Improves Your Process Performance and Competitive Advantage
Industry Average
Company Performance
Company Goal
World Class
Key Indicator(e.g., Accounts Receivable Outstanding)
Industry Average
Company Performance
Company Goal
World Class
1989 1990 1991 19921988 Goal1995
BENCHMARKING
cmpmNR888VbfbpDec92C - 10 -
As a Result, Companies Experience Strong Financial and Cultural Benefits
• Benefits are both financial . . . - “Our program resulted in a 32% reduction in operating expenses per well, per day”—Oryx
Energy
- “[Benchmarking] led to 50% savings in materials movement expense at several plants”—General Motors
- “We’ve streamlined many functional areas using benchmarking”—First Chicago
- “Product development time was cut by 50% and total costs by over 60%”—Xerox
- “Global benchmarking led to 50% reduction in selected product development cycles”—AT&T
• . . . And cultural:- Creates organizational understanding and commitment to change
- Stimulates interfunctional/departmental dialogue and brainstorming
- Works as a motivational tool to get employees to stretch
- Broadens view of employees to include best practices of other industries
The Japanese have transformed benchmarking into a long-term strategic weapon by integrating it into their planning processes.
BENCHMARKING
cmpmNR888VbfbpDec92C - 11 -
Agenda
• The Value of Benchmarking
• Overview of Gemini Benchmarking Activities
• Benchmarking for Best Practices
• Benefits of Benchmarking—Case Examples
cmpmNR888VbfbpDec92C - 12 -
Gemini Benchmarking Activities Vary According to the Issues Our Clients Face
GEMINI BENCHMARKING SERVICES
• How do they rate in creating value for their shareholders?
• How do they measure along key indices for a selected function?
• What are the competitor costs to perform a given function? Overall costs?
• How do their functions or processes perform against those of best-in-class companies?
Best Results
• Strategic benchmarking
• Key indices benchmarking
• Cost benchmarking
Best Practices
• Functional or process benchmarking
Examples of Issues Our Clients AddressedExamples of Gemini Activities
cmpmNR888VbfbpDec92C - 13 -
Strategic Benchmarking Addresses the External Stakeholder’s Assessments of a Company’s Performance
GEMINI BENCHMARKING SERVICES
Averageof Peers
Client Company A Company B Company C
Gap withAverage of
Peers
Gap withBest of Peers
P/E Ratio or Market/Book Value
cmpmNR888VbfbpDec92C - 14 -
Key Indices Benchmarking Focuses on Key Indices and Cost Drivers across Competitors
GEMINI BENCHMARKING SERVICES
Client Company A Company B Company C Company D
Net Sales $54 $80 $90 $300 $300Direct Sales Headcount 18 20 22 70 80
Example: Sales per Salesperson($ Million/Person)
A kicker box is always the same width—7.30. It grows vertically. If the text 14 Point Bold Italic type with punctuation.
Cost benchmarking translates cost drivers into cost estimates to assess economic advantages or disadvantages.
$3.0
$4.0 $4.1 $4.2
$3.8
cmpmNR888VbfbpDec92C - 15 -
Best Practices Benchmarking Compares Practices and Performances of Specific Value Chain Functions or Processes
GEMINI BENCHMARKING SERVICES
MarketPlanning
TechnicalPlanning
Product/Service
Structuring
Operations
Product Delivery• Risk Assessment• Information
Customer Service• Service• Billings
Sales andPromotion
Best-in-Class
Support Activities
Example: Telecom Client Value Chain
Pdt/Svc Development Pdt/Svc Realization Pdt/Svc Delivery
cmpmNR888VbfbpDec92C - 16 -
Most Current Benchmarking Efforts Center on Best Practices
GEMINI ACTIVITIES
• Provides a scorecard across current competitors
• Shows how efficiently or effectively a function is performed
• Data collection
• Indices- or cost-based
• Asks questions
• Highlights the “whats” and “hows”
• Shows how best-in-class companies perform selected functions or processes
• Action
• Work practices–based
• Answers questions
Let’s discuss best practices benchmarking in more detail.
Best Results Best Practices
cmpmNR888VbfbpDec92C - 17 -
Agenda
• The Value of Benchmarking
• Overview of Gemini Benchmarking Activities
• Benchmarking for Best Practices
• Benefits of Benchmarking—Case Examples
cmpmNR888VbfbpDec92C - 18 -
Effective Benchmarking Must Avoid Usual Pitfalls
BEST PRACTICES
Independent Initiative
vs.
Integrated with Other Efforts
Staff Consultant Exercise
vs.
Line Ownership
Unfocused
vs.
CSFs in Value ChainCost Comparisons
vs.
Multiple Measures
Data Collection
vs.
Action
Direct Competitor Only
vs.
Best-in-Class
Gemini Approach to Benchmarking
Common Errors
cmpmNR888VbfbpDec92C - 19 -
Benchmarking for Best Practices Revolves around Continuous Improvement
BEST PRACTICES
Plan
Benchmarking is an ongoing cycle, not a one-shot process.
Imp
lem
ent C
ollect
Analyze
ContinuousImprovement
cmpmNR888VbfbpDec92C - 20 -
Deciding What and Whom to Benchmark
Three questions must be answered . . .
• What should be benchmarked?
• What are the key performance metrics?
• Whom should we benchmark?
. . . By taking the following steps:
• Identify the alternatives
• Develop selection criteria
• Make the selection
BEST PRACTICES
cmpmNR888VbfbpDec92C - 21 -
In Selecting Functions or Processes, We ConsiderMajor Opportunities for Change
• Which functions represent the greatest percentage of costs?
• Which functions add the most value to the customers, shareholders, and internal organization?
• Which functions have the most room for improvement?
• Which functions can realistically be improved?
BEST PRACTICES: WHAT
There is no set answer to determining appropriate functions to benchmark.
cmpmNR888VbfbpDec92C - 22 -
For Each Selected Process or Function, We Identify Activities, Practices, and Metrics
BEST PRACTICES: WHAT
How best-in-class firmstranslate customer
requirements into orders
Number of changes perorder
Order entry
How best-in-class firmsmanage priorities and
scheduling
Number of customercontracts per producer
Key Activities Best Practices Metrics
Functional Example:Special Orders
Process Example:Sales Agents
The value-added steps in each
function or process
The way best-in- class firms perform
those steps
The performance
measurements best-
in-class firms use
Definition
type with punctuation.
A key question: how “deep” do we need to benchmark the selected process function to extract actionable learnings?
Converting sales calls
cmpmNR888VbfbpDec92C - 23 -
Identifying Whom to Benchmark Against Is Key
Examples: How to determine best-in-class analogs for a manufacturer:
BEST PRACTICES: WHO
Process orFunction
• Sales support • Order entry• Order tracking• Handling customer
inquiries
• Transaction-based• Multiple orders from
multiple customers• Combination of
technical products and services
• Orders often customized per customer requirements
• Direct order PC maker
• Dell Computer
Analogous IndustryCriteria
Key ActivitiesAnalogousIndustries
Best-in-classFirms
cmpmNR888VbfbpDec92C - 24 -
Target Companies Offer Trade-offs between Benchmarking Cost and Returns
Internal(e.g., otherbusinesses
ofcorporation)
DirectCompetitors
Best-in-Class(functionalor process leaders
from other
industries)
A kicker box is always the same width—7.30. It grows vertically. If the text t. Use 14 Point Bold Italic type with punctuation.
The selected examples must be accepted as truly comparable by the organization.
BEST PRACTICES: WHO
Value/Returns ofBenchmarking
Difficulty/Cost of Benchmarking
Low High
High
Low
Value and Difficulty of Benchmarkingfor Different Types of Companies
cmpmNR888VbfbpDec92C - 25 -
Collecting Data
BEST PRACTICES
Internal(based on readily
available data)•Reviews•Libraries•Surveys•Internal site visits •Interviews
Secondary• Industry reports• Professional
associations• Seminars• Technical journals• Vendors• Academia• Consultants
Primary Sources• Industry surveys • Focus groups• Industry experts• Customer feedback• Site visits• Exchange of
information• Recent competitor
hires
Easier More Difficult
cmpmNR888VbfbpDec92C - 26 -
Many Gemini Benchmarking Efforts Have IncludedBroad Client Participation
• Provides oversight and leadership• Updates other executives• Participates in site visits
• Coordinate benchmarking effort• Develop plans• Conduct secondary and primary research• Analyze gaps• Help develop implementation recommendations
• Provide expert insight into functions and processes
• Participate in collecting external data• Participate in gap analysis• Validate benchmarking plan
• Participate in site visits• Validate benchmarking plans• Collect internal data• Implement
BEST PRACTICES
Champion
Core Team (full-time)
Content Experts (part-time)
Other Participants (ad hoc)
• Client person
• 2 Gemini consultants• 2 client staff people
• Several client staff people
• Gemini consultants and academics
• Other team [Gemini and client] members
Example:Telecom Team Member Role
A kicker box is always the same width—7.30. It grows vertically. If the text t. Use 14 Point Bold Italic type with punctuation.
Broad client participation usually increases buy-in and facilitates the future change process.
cmpmNR888VbfbpDec92C - 27 -
Analyzing Gaps between Internal and External Performance Suggests Change Programs
BEST PRACTICES
TryHarder
EmulateLeapFrog
Changethe Process
Four Types of Change Programs to Meet Best-in-Class Standards
• Vague• Unactionable• Demoralizing
• Long-run mediocrity
• Band-Aid
• Dynamic• Creative• Out-of-industry
(often)
• Strategic or operational paradigm shift
• “Position” builder
cmpmNR888VbfbpDec92C - 28 -
These Programs and Actions Need to Be Implemented Quickly and Monitored over Time
• Speedy implementation ensures you won’t get left behind
• Monitoring allows constant internal and external comparison:
- Systems must be put in place
- Someone must own the process
• Improvement should be a continuous goal, based on annual recalibrations
BEST PRACTICES
cmpmNR888VbfbpDec92C - 29 -
Agenda
• The Value of Benchmarking
• Overview of Gemini Benchmarking Activities
• Benchmarking for Best Practices
• Benefits of Benchmarking—Case Examples:
- Human Resources Function for a Service Company
- Corporate Planning Process for an Industrial Company
cmpmNR888VbfbpDec92C - 30 -
A Recent Gemini Assignment Illustrates the Process and Benefits of Benchmarking
• A joint client–Gemini team benchmarked the Human Resources function
• Identified potential savings of $31 million (NPV) over the next five years
• Recommendations are currently being implemented
A CASE EXAMPLE: HUMAN RESOURCES FUNCTION
cmpmNR888VbfbpDec92C - 31 -
Historically, Benchmarking and Competitor Awareness Had Been a Low Priority at Our Client
Background
• “Upper management does not realize the importance of benchmarking”
• “It’s unbelievable how little we know about competitors and our marketplace”
• “We don’t even benchmark our competitors, let alone those considered best-in-class”
A CASE EXAMPLE: HUMAN RESOURCES FUNCTION
cmpmNR888VbfbpDec92C - 32 -
The Benchmarking Team Identified Improvement Opportunities in Eight Key Activities
• Benefits Administration
• Outplacement
• HR Data
• Exempt Staff Employment
A CASE EXAMPLE: HUMAN RESOURCES FUNCTION
• Management Employment/Staffing
• Management Development/ Succession Planning
• Salary and Wage Administration
• Communications
Improvement Opportunities
type with punctuation.
We will use staff employment to illustrate the data collection, analysis, and recommendation phases.
cmpmNR888VbfbpDec92C - 33 -
The Team Visited Four Best-in-Class HumanResources Organizations . . .
• Companies benchmarked:
- Merck
- 3M
- GE
- Xerox
• These best-in-class companies shared three common elements with our client:
- A quality orientation
- The pursuit of a differentiation strategy
- Recognition of HR’s critical role in implementing strategy
A CASE EXAMPLE: HUMAN RESOURCES FUNCTION
cmpmNR888VbfbpDec92C - 34 -
. . . And Conducted In-Depth Interviews with Many Additional Companies
MotorolaAmerican AirlinesMCIMarriottThe TravelersHewlett-PackardUnited AirlinesIBMPepsicoExxonPEPCOFederal ExpressDEC
A CASE EXAMPLE: HUMAN RESOURCES FUNCTION
Baldrige winnerEmploymentWorkforceWorkforceWorkforceHR statusEmploymentBaldrige winnerManagement developmentRecruitingLocal utilityBaldrige winnerOutplacement
type with punctuation.
Intensive telephone interviewing provided depth and a basis for “apples-to-apples” comparisons.
Benchmarked Reason for Inclusion
cmpmNR888VbfbpDec92C - 35 -
The Team Found That World-Class Companies Were Significantly Outperforming Our Client’s HR Practices
HR headcount/jobs filled 1:64 1:107 1:189 1:180 1:150N/A
Applicant yield 7% <5% <5% 10%–12% 6%<5%
Employment budget per $920 <$400 $300 $625 $666N/A
jobs filled
A CASE EXAMPLE: HUMAN RESOURCES FUNCTION
Measure ClientCompany
ACompany
BCompany
CCompany
DCompany
E
cmpmNR888VbfbpDec92C - 36 -
We Identified a Variety of Successful HR Models
A CASE EXAMPLE: HUMAN RESOURCES FUNCTION
Employby Major
Site
Applica-tions
Screen
TestingScreen
Interviews Advertise-
mentsReferralsCompany
Dis-tributedServices
Cen-tralized
Decen-tralized
CommonPolicies
A ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦
B ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦
C ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦
D ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦
E ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦
F ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦
G ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦
H ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦
cmpmNR888VbfbpDec92C - 37 -
We Recommended Major Changes within the Scope of a Gemini Transformation Project
• Make HR facilitator in hiring process:- Manages recruitment channels- Keeps applications on file- Screens applicants for manager- Allows managers to decide who will
work for them
• Utilize three major recruitment channels:- Advertising/job fairs- Employee referrals- Site-based applications distribution
(centralized processing)
• Redesign applicant screening process:- Aggressively screen applicants- Utilize on-site and remote testing
• Close several employment offices:- Hiring and testing to occur on site or
at job fair locations
A CASE EXAMPLE: HUMAN RESOURCES FUNCTION
• Current system is passive, creating unneeded HR support
• New model is consistent with the client’s notion of empowering managers
• Cuts employment office costs• Avoids “perishable inventory” problems• Uses methodologies successfully employed
both inside and outside the client
• Eliminates “bricks and mortar” and support costs of employment-related headcount
• Moves closer to “best practices” model
• Reduces employment overhead:- Cuts headcount- Reduces corporate facilities costs
RationaleRecommended Approach
cmpmNR888VbfbpDec92C - 38 -
Aggressive Timeframes Were Set for Implementation
• Develop implementation team
• Select and put in place set-up team
• Begin distribution of applications and model recruiting sessions
A CASE EXAMPLE
• Three months
• Four months
• Six months
• Eight months
• Ten months
• Phase out employment offices
• Complete implementation
ActionTimeframe
(from Benchmarking Date)
cmpmNR888VbfbpDec92C - 39 -
Agenda
• The Value of Benchmarking
• Overview of Gemini Benchmarking Activities
• Benchmarking for Best Practices
• Benefits of Benchmarking—Case Examples:
- Human Resources Function for a Service Company
- Corporate Planning Process for an Industrial Company
cmpmNR888VbfbpDec92C - 40 -
Another Gemini Assignment Sheds Additional Light on the Process and Benefits of Benchmarking
• A joint client–Gemini team worked on the planning process for a large industrial corporation:
- Two natural work teams (NWTs) looked at the current process
- A benchmarking team reviewed best practices from other companies
• Identified major improvement areas for the corporate and business planning groups
• Recommendations have been and are still being implemented across the corporation
A CASE EXAMPLE: PLANNING PROCESS
The benchmarking findings energized the group and accelerated change—the NWTs realized that major improvement could be introduced.
cmpmNR888VbfbpDec92C - 41 -
We Visited Several World-Class Companies to Discuss Their Corporate and Business Processes
• The benchmarking team visited professionals in more than a dozen U.S. and European corporations:
- Half in the natural resources field
- The other half in diversified industries
• These companies met stringent selection criteria:
- Large size (more than $5 billion in revenues) and organized into several divisions
- Multinational and well managed (“world class”)
- Have formal planning processes
• Our discussions revolved around:
- Goals of the planning process
- Scenario planning and strategy formulation
- Planning process timetables, strengths, issues, and responsibilities
A CASE EXAMPLE: PLANNING PROCESS
cmpmNR888VbfbpDec92C - 42 -
Findings: Corporate Planning Has Many Responsibilities
Core responsibilities
• Review and oversee planning methodologies and processes
• Coordinate and oversee the planning process
• Test and challenge divisional plans
• Consolidate divisional plans
• Run corporate models
Additional responsibilities
• Help businesses formulate their strategies and develop plans
• Evaluate investment proposals (e.g., M&A opportunities)
• Develop macroeconomic and industry-specific outlooks
• Develop scenarios; coordinate scenario planning
• Coordinate and deliver ad hoc studiesCorporate planning is increasingly perceived as an internal consultant, or “think tank,” organization.
A CASE EXAMPLE: PLANNING PROCESS
cmpmNR888VbfbpDec92C - 43 -
Visits Highlighted That Companies May Have up to Three Corporate Planning Cycles
A typical planning process
Board approves Operating Plan
Top executives approve Operating Plan
Businesses prepare Operating Plan
Corporate economists revise economic and industry-specific outlooks
Top executives approve Long-Range Plan
Corporate Planning tests/challenges Long-Range Plan
Businesses develop Long-Range Plan
Top executives approve and issue economic and industry-specific outlooks
Corporate economists develop economic and industry-specific outlooks
Businesses formulate their strategies (at any time during the first half of the year)
PlanningCycles
3. OperatingPlanning
2. Long-Range
Planning
1. StrategyFormulation
A CASE EXAMPLE: PLANNING PROCESS
J F M A M J J A S O N D
J F M A M
1992
1993
cmpmNR888VbfbpDec92C - 44 -
Findings: Several Corporations Are Modifying Their Planning Processes
• Rely on time-consuming, numbers-intensive activities
• Extrapolate historic performance instead of “true” strategic thinking
• Suffer from top management’s tendency to “adjust” plans without reviewing program-specific detail
• Allow little time for planning
A CASE EXAMPLE: PLANNING PROCESS
• Reengineer the planning process to achieve higher efficiency and effectiveness
• Streamline the corporate planning and business planning organizations
• Deemphasize numbers-driven nature of plans
• Introduce a strategy formulation cycle separate from the long-range planning process
• Appoint high-level planning committees to focus on major strategic issues
• Introduce scenario-planning workshops• Eliminate mechanistic approaches to
planning• Decouple long-range plans from operating
plans• Encourage top management to overcome its
natural tendency to crunch numbers• Modify the planning schedule (e.g., conduct
strategic planning every two years as opposed to every year)
Commonly Perceived Weaknesses How Companies Address Them
cmpmNR888VbfbpDec92C - 45 -
Findings: Companies Increasingly Rely on Outside Parties for Their Macro-Level Assumptions
Interviewees mention several reasons for this trend
• “Our corporate economics group was dismantled eight years ago.”—Metal Co.
• “. . . macroeconomic outlooks are bought rather than developed in-house.”—Paper Co.
• “Our Corporate Economics department engages in high-value-added activities such as promoting our company’s image with various shareholders. We purchase [vendor] economic forecasts, review them, and modify them as needed.”—Chemical Co.
• “It is becoming very expensive for us to maintain our models. . . . We are constantly looking for more efficient ways of getting the work done. Outsourcing seems to offer economies of scale for a number of economic forecasting activities.”—Computer Co.
A CASE EXAMPLE: PLANNING PROCESS
cmpmNR888VbfbpDec92C - 46 -
We Recommended Major Changes, Which the Client Is Already Implementing
These changes have already been implemented and the client has experienced that the increased flexibility in its long-range plans allows better, “more strategic” decision making and communications.
Sample of recommendations from benchmarking
• Role and responsibility changes:
- Corporate Planning to test validity of and consolidate divisional plans
- Businesses to develop stronger, more strategic long-range plans, not just budgets
• Scenario planning:
- Corporation to introduce scenario review and sensitivity analysis to major environmental changes
• Outsourcing:
- Increased use of third-party providers (e.g., economic, industry-specific think tanks)
A CASE EXAMPLE: PLANNING PROCESS
Top Related