1
Science in Society
Work Programme 2011
European Commission, DG Research
2
The overall aim is to…
contribute to an open, effective and democratic
European knowledge-based societyB
y:
Embedding SiS in the European
Research Area, contributing to Europe 2020
Matching Science and technology policies with societal needs and Grand Challenges
Creating and developing capacities
Science in Society within the European Research Area
2010 A new mandate for research
Europe 2020 Strategy
New Treaty
Commissioner for Research, Innovation and Science - Máire Geoghegan-Quinn from Ireland
“Science must belong in society”
New Treaty defines European Research Area (ERA) as the area in which researchers, scientific knowledge and technology circulate freely (art 179)
4
Science in SocietyWork Programmes 2007 - 2011
Work Programmes 2007 - 2011:Follow the action lines of the Science in Society
part of the Capacities Specific Programme adopted in 2006
Set out the actions to be undertaken during the year
Evolution of the total budget: 2009: € 34.5 million (€31.8 for the calls) 2010: € 51.5 million (€46.6 for the calls)
2011: €45.9 million (€43.3 for the calls)
5
SiS 2010 and beyond
Since 2010 a new approach to Science in Society:
Ensuring a strong SiS dimension in the European Research Area
More focused and structured actions, with greater EU added value, wider impact and wider range of key actors /stakeholders
Mobilising new stakeholders A better visibility a EU level, accessibility of the
programme
6
Work Programme 2011:Main aspects
Research component (5 topics) Broader public engagement -> Mobilisation and Mutual
Learning Action Plans
Open Access
[NEW] Clusters of cities for innovation
Science Education -> teacher training, and research on pre-school and primary school
Gender and Research -> structural change in research organisations and universities
[NEW] Research on Science and Society interaction in the digital technologies era
7
Work Programme 2011:Specific provisions on lump sumpayments
New, specific financial provisions for four topics:
SiS.2011.1.0-1 Mobilisation and Mutual Learning (MML) Action Plans SiS.2011.1.3.3-1 Reinforcing European strategies on access, dissemination
and preservation of scientific information in the digital ageSiS.2011.1.3.4-1 Clusters of cities of scientific culture for innovationSiS.2011.2.2.1-1 Teacher training on inquiry based teaching methods
• Proposals may bring together different stakeholder organisations as partners with the objective of exploiting their networking capacities and facilities, such as European networks, groupings, partnerships, etc.
• These stakeholder organisations may wish to involve some of their members directly in the planned activities in order to build on the existing cooperation structures and networks and in so doing these members will incur project related costs.
• To facilitate the participation of such members who are seeking grant support only for their participation in certain project activities, the related expenses could be reimbursed in the form of a lump sum. Therefore, such reimbursements do not require the justification of real costs.
• This reimbursement is limited to a maximum of EUR 25 000 per member, per grant agreement. The maximum amount to be reimbursed in the form of a lump sum shall not exceed 15% per grant.
See the Work Programme (page 5) for more information
8
More dynamic GOVERNANCE
of S&S relationship
More dynamic GOVERNANCE
of S&S relationship
Strengthening POTENTIAL
broadening HORIZONS
Strengthening POTENTIAL
broadening HORIZONS
Science & Society COMMUNICATE
Science & Society COMMUNICATE
3 action lines 7 activities +1
Broader engagement science
issues
5.1.2
Science system, codes,
expertise
5.1.3
Role of
univ
5.1.4
Young people and science education
5.2.2
Two-way communication of science and the public,
and role of the media
5.3.
Overall Work Programme Structure
Gender and research
5.2.1
Place of S&T
in society
5.1.1MMLaction
s
5.1.0.1
9
2 calls , 2 different budgets, different funding schemes, different deadlines:
• FP7-SCIENCE IN SOCIETY-2011-1 – €43.0 million
• FP7-SCIENCE IN SOCIETY-EVENTS – single topic €0.3 million
Be sure to read carefully the call text and call fiches and the Guide for Applicants
Check the eligibility criteria
WP 2011 implementation:Calls for proposals
10
More dynamic GOVERNANCE
of S&S relationship
More dynamic GOVERNANCE
of S&S relationship
Strengthening POTENTIAL
broadening HORIZONS
Strengthening POTENTIAL
broadening HORIZONS
Science & Society COMMUNICATE
Science & Society COMMUNICATE
3 action lines 7 activities +1
Work Programme 2011Call content
MMLaction
s
5.1.0
11
1.0-1 Mobilisation & Mutual Learning Action Plans
• New initiative in the 2010 Work Programme, further developed in 2011
• Mobilisation of wide range of actors engaged in long term partnerships to design and implement actions on themes of interest for society- where research is at stake
• In 2011, the three chosen Specific Challenges (themes) are Low Carbon Society, Food & Health, and Marine Resources
• Themes treated by incorporating Science in Society actions into research strategies/planning
• Mutual learning between partners
12
Mobilisation and Mutual Learning Action Plans
PARTNERSHIPS: Research organisations + CSOs + other types of actors engaged as partners in the proposal consortium:
13
1.0-1 MMLs Specific Provisions/Eligibility Criteria
• At least 3 years duration (eligibility)• Must clearly indicate which of the three
Challenges is addressed (eligibility)• At least 10 legal entities in 10 different
countries (eligibility)• CSA (Supporting) – research as such not funded• Budget : € 16,4 million – Envisaged that 4
proposals will be financed (at least one, no more than two per Challenge)
14
1.0-1 MML Expected impacts
• In the MML Action Plans, the governance of research and technological development will be adapted to facilitate sustainable and inclusive solutions to key challenges facing European society.
• The MML Action Plans will contribute to further incorporating science in society issues into the systems of research (public engagement, ethics, gender perspectives, young people’s participation, two-way communication).
• They will also contribute to an improved transnational cooperation
15
More dynamic GOVERNANCE
of S&S relationship
More dynamic GOVERNANCE
of S&S relationship
Strengthening POTENTIAL
broadening HORIZONS
Strengthening POTENTIAL
broadening HORIZONS
Science & Society COMMUNICATE
Science & Society COMMUNICATE
3 action lines 7 activities +1
Work Programme 2011Content
Place of S&T
in society
5.1.1
16
1.1.1-1 Involvement of Civil Society Organisations
(CSOs) in Research
Objectives Research aimed at better understanding the dynamics at play and
investigating the characteristics of CSOs which participate in research
Proposals must address at least 2 of 3 issues defined in the call topic as follows:- Knowledge and research potential- Research processes involving CSOs- Interaction between these cooperative research processes and research policy
CP.Budget € 1,5 Million (eligibility criterion)Envisaged that one proposal will be financedEvaluation criterion (comparative perspective)
17
1.1.1-1 Involvement of Civil Society
Organisations (CSOs) in Research
Expected Impact
Containing a wide-ranging overview of the current practices, challenges and opportunities, the research will provide:
a sound basis for the development of future policies and incentives (at national and European level) relating to the cooperation between researchers and civil society organisations
as well as practical examples and references for researchers and CSOs that wish to create such partnerships.
18
1.1.1-3 Regulating emerging scientific and
technological developments
Objectives Emerging sciences and related emerging
technologies will make the setting of hard and soft laws more sensitive in the coming years: necessary to investigate further the interplay between the co-evolution of science and law in democratic contexts.
Conditions CP Project budget max. €1.5 Million (eligibility criterion) Envisaged that one proposal will be financed Evaluation criterion (comparative perspective)
19
Activities (include)Research to investigate interplay between the co-evolution of
science and law in democratic contexts through the following two related aspects:
- Tensions resulting from Science and Technology induced progress under given governance frameworks
- Legal provisions for creating and adapting governance rules to emerging Science and Technology
ImpactBetter insight on interactions between science and law in
democratic contexts…help policy makers to better approach regulatory issues. Eventually permit the Commission to address these issues in future work programmes.
1.1.1-3 Regulating emerging scientific and
technological developments
20
1.1.1-4 Integrated assessment methods for
measuring societal impacts of emerging scientific and technological developments
Objectives Issue of societal tensions relating to emerging S&T
developments, often due to different perceptions of their impacts through different formal or informal assessment frameworks (e.g. technology assessments, Risk Assessment, Impact Assessment, Foresight ethical review, media analysis, public perception).
Conditions CP Project Budget max €1.5 Million (eligibility criterion) Envisaged that one proposal will be financed Evaluation criterion (comparative perspective)
21
Activities (include) Researchers supported under this topic should investigate
ways of integrating knowledge assessment methods into an anticipatory approach to science, technology, innovation and knowledge society progress
Impact The research outcomes will contribute to a better
understanding of the respective roles of the various Knowledge Assessment method. These outcomes will contribute to shaping an integrated framework conducive to a better and more balanced assessment of emerging sciences, technologies and related societal innovations
1.1.1-4 Integrated assessment methods for
measuring societal impacts of emerging scientific and technological
developments
22
1.1.1-5 A forward look at new ways of doing
and organising research in our knowledge societies
Objectives
Forward-looking activities to support the identification of grand challenges and the corresponding priorities for research and innovation
ConditionsCSA
Project Budget max €1.0 Million (eligibility criterion)Envisaged that one proposal will be financed
23
Activities (include)
- Stocktaking of recent and ongoing Forward-looking exercises on new ways of carrying out Research, Technology development and innovation etc.- Comparison with international forward-looking exercises- Identify trends and drivers in the way Research, Technology development and innovation operate in our societies – scenarios until 2030
ImpactThe results of the project will highlight and formalise new and innovative approaches in the ways that research is performed, supported by the identification and dissemination of best practices in the field.
1.1.1-5 A forward look at new ways of doing
and organising research in our knowledge societies
24
1.3.1-1 Reinforcing European strategies on
access, dissemination and preservation of scientific information in the digital
age Objectives
Need to capitalise on existing activities on Open Access in Member States to move towards national and European strategies on access, dissemination and preservation in the digital age.
ConditionsCSAProject Budget max € 750 000 (eligibility criterion) Envisaged that two proposals will be financed
25
Activities (include)
Actions can include the organisation of events, exchange and dissemination of good practices, or definition of organisation and management of joint or common initiatives and/or policy activities
Some target groups are identified in the call text e.g. ministries, funding bodies, universities, libraries, associations, CSOs etc.
ImpactSustain/improve coordination of existing Open Access initiatives; extend current activities to other countries and/or thematic areas; create new initiatives.
1.3.1-1 Reinforcing European strategies on
access, dissemination and preservation of scientific information in the digital
age
26
1.3.4-1 Clusters of cities of scientific culture for
innovation
Objectives
Topic aims to highlight and promote actions which demonstrate how developments in science and technology can stimulate innovation in the creative sector, and how the creative sector can stimulate the emergence of new forms of creativity and innovation in science and technology
ConditionsCSAProject Budget max € 2m (eligibility criterion) Envisaged that two proposals will be financedProject duration at least 3 years (eligibility criterion)
27
Activities (include)
- Project constructs an Action Plan containing activities on networking, dissemination and awareness-raising.- Target public can include teachers, educators, career advisers, youth and voluntary organisations, clubs, societies, cultural centres and organisations. - Examples of activities are given in the text of the topic.
Impact- Encouraging young people to look at S&T subjects in a new light and not just in terms of a qualifications for academic/research careers- regions and cities will benefit from the exchange of practice & experience (helping them work together and adopt policies to stimulate new cultural and entrepreneurial activities)
1.3.4-1 Clusters of cities of scientific culture for
innovation
28
More dynamic GOVERNANCE
of S&S relationship
More dynamic GOVERNANCE
of S&S relationship
Strengthening POTENTIAL
broadening HORIZONS
Strengthening POTENTIAL
broadening HORIZONS
Science & Society COMMUNICATE
Science & Society COMMUNICATE
3 action lines 7 activities +1
Work Programme 2011Content
Gender and research
5.2.1
Rationale:• Women still underrepresented in scientific careers• Europe needs researchers - waste of talents• Equal opportunities, better society• Diversity = better chances for excellence!
Keywords:• FP6 – Actions for women in science• FP7 – Structural change of universities and research organisations– Awareness raising and communication campaign
Gender and Research
WOMEN in SCIENCE in EU
Only 18%18% of professors Only 13%13% of the heads of
universities/research institutions Only 30%30% of researchers (19% in the
private sector)
59%59% of university graduates 45% of PhD graduates
WOMEN in SCIENCE
1st STEP - DATA COLLECTION
Increasing the number of women in science through:• Monitoring (She Figures and Gender Watch)• Working conditions (WLB, Partnership for Researchers)• Reaching out to schools to combat early stereotypes• Network promotion (EPWS) • Experts groups: access to research funding, women in
decision-making, women in private sector research...• Gender management in research organisations
Mainstreaming gender in research:• Inter-service working group on gender implications in different research fields (transports, nanotechnologies, health …)• Gender Reporting in FP funded projects
Gender and Research - Activities
Proportion of men and women in a typical academic career, students and
academic staff, EU-27, 2002/2006
59
36
18
41
64
82
41 40
33
16
45 4448
55
55 5652
45
58
46
54
84
67
605954
4642
0
20
40
60
80
100
ISCED 5AStudents
ISCED 5AGraduates
ISCED 6 Students
ISCED 6Graduates
Grade C Grade B Grade A
%
Women 2006 Men 2006 Women 2002 Men 2002
34
ObjectivesIncrease the participation and role of women researchers by
modernizing the management and working culture of research institutions
Conditions (eligibility criterion)Funding Scheme: CSA (Coordination and Support Action)Participation: Min. 3 independent entities, from 3 different
MS/Associated countriesDuration: between 3 and 5 years EC budget contribution: € 6.0 million (covering 70% of total costs
to ensure partners’ commitment to implement proposed changes)Number of Projects envisaged: two
2.1.1-1, Implementing Structural Change in research
organisations / universities
35
Activities Provide tailored action plan and roadmap for implementation
during the lifespan of the project;Focus on Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics
disciplinesPartnership to include good balance of institutions with proven
expertise in gender management and others which are seeking experience in this area;
The action plans should include activities such as transparent recruitment & promotion procedures, update management and research assessment standards, policy development to encourage women to leadership positions…
ImpactAction plans should target tangible and measureable results in terms
of female participation at all levels of seniorityDissemination plan should target a wide impact across Europe beyond
project participants, including guidelines on best practices to encourage take-up of similar activities by other organisations
Policy definition and implementation mechanisms should have a long-term vision.
2.1.1-1Implementing Structural Change in
research organisations / universities
36
More dynamic GOVERNANCE
of S&S relationship
More dynamic GOVERNANCE
of S&S relationship
Strengthening POTENTIAL
broadening HORIZONS
Strengthening POTENTIAL
broadening HORIZONS
Science & Society COMMUNICATE
Science & Society COMMUNICATE
3 action lines 7 activities +1
Young people and science education
5.2.2
Work Programme 2011Content
Science Education Now: A Renewed Pedagogy for
the Future of Europe European decision-makers
must implement change
Inquiry based science teaching must be introduced
Special interest of girls…. must be accounted for
Better participation of local actors and cities needed
Better articulation between national and European level activities
Need a coordinating body
Strategy for supporting science education
Fund actions through call for proposals …
- co-ordination and support actions (teacher training on Inquiry Based Science Education): S-TEAM, FIBONACCI, PRIMAS, ESTABLISH …
- research activities
Link outputs to a central internet based information platform WWW.SCIENTIX.EU
• The new web-based community for Science Education targeted at teachers, researchers and policy makers.
• 6 EU languages
• will be available in May 2010 at http://scientix.eu.
• Carried out by European Schoolnet (EUN) on behalf of the European Commission (DG Research).
40
2.2.1-1 Teacher training on Inquiry-Based
Science Education
Objectives Promote a more widespread use of problem and inquiry-based
science teaching (IBSE) techniques in primary and secondary schools
Bridge the gap between the science education research community, science teachers and local actors
Complement school science education curricula Focus on teacher training and promotion of European teachers’
networksConditions CSA (Supporting): min. 10 independent legal entities from 10 MS or
AC (eligibility criterion)Minimum requested EC contribution: € 2 000 000 (eligibility
criterion)Minimum project duration: 3 years (eligibility criterion)Envisaged that 3 proposals will be fundedProjects will contribute to the internet platform – www.scientix.eu
41
Activities (include)Securing basic knowledge, a task culture, learning from mistakes,
cumulative and autonomous learning, interdisciplinary approaches and attention to differences between boys’ and girls’ interests, promoting pupils’ cooperation
Actions shall already have proven their efficiency and efficacyMust be realistic and feasible in terms of teachers’ participationOpen to participation of entities seeking to gain experience on IBSE
ImpactChange the way science is taught in schools in Europe Significant benefits across Europe beyond project participantsLong-term impact: increase the number of young people taking up
science careers in Europe and increase knowledge in science among younger generations
2.2.1-1 Teacher Training on inquiry-based
science education
42
2.2.3-1, Science and mathematics related activities in pre-school and
primary school
ObjectivesA more creative approach to teaching and learning of science and
mathematics based on curiosity and inquiry would be beneficial from a very young age
Major shift in education culture and practices is needed in order to adapt to today’s world.
Conditions CPProject Budget max €1.5 Million (eligibility criterion)Envisaged that one proposal will be financedEvaluation criterion (comparative perspective)
43
Activities (include)The research project will carry out a mapping and comparative
assessment of existing approaches to the teaching and learning of science and mathematics in pre-school and until first years of primary school in a representative sample countries.
Analysis of the implications of the different approaches for children’s creativity; actions should include policy recommendations, dissemination activities and guidelines for teacher training
ImpactA clear picture of existing activities and practices and the related
main challenges will contribute towards the training of preschool staff and primary school teachers, to avoid misconceptions and stereotypical images about science and mathematics. This will improve the basic skills of all children, and promote creativity leading to the subsequent development of entrepreneurial skills and the ability to innovate.
2.2.3-1, Science and mathematics related activities in pre-school and
primary school
44
2.2.3-2 European events
ObjectiveTo stimulate interest in research careers in S&T among masters and
doctoral students by bringing them in direct contact with distinguished scientists
Conditions
Separate call for proposals with earlier deadline: 25 November !
CSAOnly 1 proposal will be funded (covering events in 2011,
2012, 2013)Maximum requested EU contribution of €300 000
45
Activities (include)Support to complement the costs of scientific gatherings already
scheduled, for participation costs of studentsNote conditions as regards selection of students (incl. country
and gender balance), communication strategy etc.
Impact
To provide added impetus to students studying for a masters or doctoral degree or equivalent in science and technology; to encourage them to pursue careers in research and broaden their knowledge and understanding of science and technology and of the latest scientific breakthroughs
2.2.3-2 European events
COMMUNICATION &
SCIENTIFIC CULTURE Science Festivals, Science Centres, Training of
journalistes, Social media, Prizes …
FP 7 examples
ESCONETMy Science
Relate4Seas
HULDAScicomAccent
EUZOO-XXIM.I.C.AVSACASC
Comscience
FUNDScicafe
48
3.0.6-1 Science-Society interaction in the digital technologies era
Objectives Digital technologies have a profound impact on access to
science-related information and how it is shared and used, and allow a degree of interactivity between the scientific community and the public. But are these tools being used to the best effect? Does the public discriminate between the types and quality of information posted?
Conditions CPProject Budget max €1.5 Million (eligibility criterion)Envisaged that one proposal will be financedEvaluation criterion (comparative perspective)
49
Activities (include)Research to assess opportunities and risks in the use of web and
social media for information and communication between scientists and the public; with a broad European coverage and an international perspective; identify impact of emerging communication technologies on public perception of and engagement with science; etc.
ImpactBetter insight on the role played by emerging web tools in
science/society interaction, in particular on collaborative effect and dissemination.
Role of these technologies on new models of public engagement in science issues debates and decision-making.
3.0.6-1 Science-Society interaction in the digital technologies era
50
Key Dates for WP2011
Call publication: 20 July 2010http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/dc/index.cfm
Register early in the EPSS!
Deadline: 20 January 2011 (but 25 November for Events topic!)
Evaluation: completed by June 2011
First contracts signed: from September 2011
51
Relevant Websites
SCIENCE IN SOCIETY PORTAL
http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/home_en.cfm
PARTICIPANTS’ PORTALhttp://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal
SCIENCE AND SOCIETY in FP7 – CORDIS WEBSITE http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/capacities/science-society_en.html
Find previous projects and partners http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/index.cfm?
fuseaction=public.topic&id=66
EVALUATORS, please (re)-register at:https://cordis.europa.eu/emmfp7/index.cfm?
fuseaction=wel.welcome
Top Related