1
NSF Undergraduate Programs
Five CollegesApril 2012
Duncan McBrideDivision of Undergraduate Education
National Science Foundation
Email: [email protected]
2
Outline of Talk
National Science Foundation Division of Undergraduate Education Transforming Undergrad STEM Ed
(TUES) S-STEM, STEP RUI, ROA, REU What Happens to Your Proposal? What to Do After a Decline? Discussion and Questions
What is NSF
A federal agency that funds grants for research and education in all sciences
Provides 21% of federal research support
Provides majority of support in Computer Sci, Math, Social. Sci, Environmental Sci, Physical Sci. Also basic Bio (excluding NIH)
Director, National Science Board, 7 Assistant Directors, ~52 Divisions 4/9/20123
What is NSF (continued)
Annual budget of $7.0 billion Staff of 1400 career, 200 rotator, 450
contractor 55,600 proposals a year, 13,000 new
grants 46,000 reviewers Web site www.nsf.gov includes both
organization and staff telephone directories.
4
Division of Undergraduate Education
Responsible for programs that support excellence at the undergraduate level in all sciences
Multi-disciplinary staff, all with strong disciplinary connections
Programs: Transforming Undergraduate Education in
Science* Advanced Technological Education Scholarships in STEM* Federal Cyber-Service Scholarships Noyce Teacher Scholarships STEM Talent Expansion* Math-Science Partnerships
5
.
Other undergraduate programs and activities in many NSF Divisions.
Include here three activities across NSF:
Research in Undergraduate Institutions*Research Opportunity Awards*Research Experiences for
Undergraduates*
6
Who’s Who in DUE Biology
Celeste Carter Jose Herrera Mary Lee Ledbetter Terry Woodin
Chemistry Pam Brown Joe Grabowski Hal Richtol
Computer Science Guy-Alain Amoussou Sue Fitzgerald Victor Piotrowski Suzanne Westbrook
Geosciences Peter Lea
Engineering Maura Borrego Louis Everett Susan Finger Don Millard
Math Richard Alo Ron Buckmire Lee Zia
Physics/Astronomy Duncan McBride Dick Peterson
Social Sciences/Assessment Connie Della-Piana Myles Boylan
[Vacancies in Eng, Chem, Geo]4/9/20127
8
Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and
Mathematics (TUES)
DUE’s broadest, most flexible program
Purpose of the Program To improve the quality of STEM education
for all students by targeting activities affecting learning environments, course content, curricula, and educational practices
Supports projects at all levels of undergraduate education.
Supports activities in the classroom, laboratory, and field settings
CCLI became TUES two years ago
9
TUES: Three Scales of Projects
Type 1 Projects (small grants)Up to $200,000 ($250,000 when 4-year & 2-year schools collaborate); 2 to 3 years (can occur at a single institution with primarily local impact)
Type 2 Projects (medium grants) Up to $600,000; 2 to 4 years; build on smaller-scale proven ideas. Diverse users at several institutions
Type 3 Projects (large grants) Up to $5,000,000; negotiable; 3 to 5 years; combine proven results and mature products. Involve several diverse institutions
10
TUES: Additional opportunity
Central Resource Projects: Leadership activities in TUES Research or evaluation on the TUES
program Meetings for TUES PIs or a large
subset to encourage cooperation among PIs
Budget depends on scope and scale of the project
Need close consultation with the program
11
Implementing Educational Innovations
Creating New Learning Materials and
Teaching Strategies
Assessing Learning and
Evaluating Innovations
Developing Faculty
Expertise
Project Component
s
Research on Undergraduate STEM Teaching and Learning
TUES “Cycle of Innovation”
12
TUES - Creating New Learning Materials and Teaching
Strategies Type 1 projects can focus on piloting new
educational materials and instructional methods; Type 2 projects on larger-scale development, broad testing, and assessment.
Type 1 projects can focus on outcomes at a single site, but must include evaluation and some way of engaging the scientific community outside the local site.
Can be combined with other components, especially faculty development in Type 2.
13
TUES - Developing Faculty Expertise
Activities that enable faculty to gain expertise May range from short-term workshops to
sustained activities Foster new communities of scientists in
undergraduate education Cost-effective professional development
Diverse group of faculty Leading to implementation
May be combined with other components, especially materials development and assessment
Excellent opportunities exist for you to participate in regional and national workshops
14
TUES - Implementing Educational Innovations
Phase 1 projects generally Projects must result in improved STEM
education at local institution via implementing exemplary materials, laboratory experiences, or educational practices developed and tested at other institutions.
TUES-Implementation projects must stand as models for broader adaptation in the scientific community.
Proposals may request funds in any budget category supported by NSF, including instrumentation
15
TUES - Assessing Learning and Evaluating Innovations
Design and test new assessment and evaluation tools and processes.
Apply new and existing tools to conduct broad-based assessments Must span multiple projects and be of
general interest
16
TUES - Conducting Research on STEM Teaching and Learning
Develop new research on teaching and learning
Synthesize previous results and theories
Practical focus Testable new ideas Impact on STEM educational practices.
May be combined with other components
17
Examples of Phase (Type) 1 TUES Projects
David Marsh, Washington and Lee University “Toads, Roads, and Nodes: Collaborative Course-Based Research on the Landscape Ecology of Amphibian Populations” NSF award 1140475
Jamie Schneider, University of Wisconsin-River Falls “Collaborative Research: Immediate Feedback Assessment in Chemistry Courses” NSF award 1140914
David Kinner, Western Carolina University “Testing the Benefits of Undergraduate Research-Based Learning … in … Hydrogeomorphology” NSF award 1044632
Stephen Hagen, University of Florida “An Advanced Laboratory in Biological Physics”, NSF award 1139906
18
Human Subjects and the IRB(Institutional Review Board)
Projects collecting data from or on students or faculty members are considered to involve human subjects and require IRB review
Proposal should indicate IRB status on the cover Exempt, Approved, Pending NSF Grants Office will require an official
statement from the IRB declaring the research exempt or approved.
See “Human Subjects” section in GPG NOTE: For TUES, IRB approval usually is
obtained during award negotiations, not with the proposal.
19
Important Features of Successful TUES Projects
Quality, Relevance, and Impact: Transform
Student Focus Use of and Contribution to the STEM
Education Knowledge Base STEM Education Community-Building Expected Measurable Outcomes Project Evaluation
20
Expected Measurable Outcomes
Goals and objectives translated into expected measurable outcomes Project specific
Some expected measurable outcomes on Student learning Contributions to the knowledge base Community building
Used to monitor progress, guide the project, and evaluate its ultimate impact
21
Project Evaluation
Include strategies for Monitoring the project as it evolves Evaluating the project’s effectiveness
when completed Based on the project-specific
expected measurable outcomes Appropriate for scope of the project
22
Lessons From Prior Rounds of the Program
Type 1 is an open competition – many new players;
Type 2 requires substantial demonstrated preliminary work;
Type 3 is for projects from an experienced team with a national scale.
Program web page on the NSF-DUE-TUES site includes link to recent awards (abstracts and contact information)
23
Funding and Deadlines Expect to fund, all disciplines
130 Type 1 projects 45 Type 2 projects 4-6 Type 3 projects 1-3 Central Resource projects
TUES spends about $56 million per year
Proposal Deadlines Type 1: May 28-29, 2012 Type 2 and 3, and CRP : January 14,
2013 [Focused CRP workshops by
agreement.]
24
What is new since CCLI TYPES have replaced PHASES Raised limit on proposal size ($200K,
$600K, $5M, $3M) Explicit encouragement of projects with
the potential to be transformative New Central Resource Project
opportunity Increased emphasis on building on
knowledge of how students learn, building on prior work, and encouraging widespread adoption of excellent teaching methods.
25
What is new for 2012 Increased emphasis on projects that
have the potential to transform undergraduate education Special interest in widespread adoption of
exemplary materials Larger projects should promote adaptation
elsewhere Increased emphasis on
institutionalization of project While some added emphases, no
significant change in direction Remains DUE’s core program that
funds the best ideas in the disciplines (and interdisciplinary projects)
Research in Undergraduate Institutions (RUI)
An activity in all NSF research programs; not a separate program. Research program deadlines apply
Proposals evaluated in regular research programs
No separate program budget; funded from research programs
Proposals require a RUI Impact Statement and receive special review instructions
Lots of RUI experience at the four colleges Contacts: Program Directors in the appropriate
research program Spending: 2011 $58.6 million across NSF
26
Research Opportunity Awards (ROA)
Supplements to existing NSF research grants
Support a faculty member from a predominately undergraduate institution to participate in research at another institution
Advantages: supplement is quick and informal; provides a chance to start research
Disadvantage: Not a grant to the PUI faculty
Spending: small; a part of RUI Under-used
27
Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU)
Research for undergraduate students Sites (independent grants) or supplements to
existing NSF research grants A significant number of students from outside
the host institution Students must be citizens or permanent
residents Managed by NSF research Division or
Directorate Budget: Stipends for students; supplies;
small amount for PI; limited admin allowance Spending: 2011: $78.6 million Deadline: First Friday in June
28
29
Writing a Proposal: Getting Started
Formatting, Fastlane, and Grants.gov NSF proposal format requirements
15 single-spaced pages Check type fonts required Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact explicit in Project
Summary Other required format instructions in Grant Proposal
Guide Fastlane submission
Web-based software – access from any browser Mature, well-supported system for NSF Accepts many file types, converts to .pdf
Grants.gov Government-wide system, less friendly than
Fastlane, does not support all NSF forms. Allow extra time.
30
What Happens to your Proposal?
Submission of proposal via FastLane Proposals are reviewed individually or by panels of
faculty within the discipline(s) [Note: DUE primarily uses panels]
A minimum of three persons outside NSF review each proposal
For proposals reviewed by a panel, individual reviews and a panel summary are prepared for each proposal
NSF program staff member attends the panel discussion
The Program Officer assigned to manage the proposal’s review considers the advice of reviewers and formulates a recommendation
Negotiations may be necessary to address reviewers’ comments, budget issues, and other concerns
31
What Happens to Your Proposal (cont)
NSF is has the goal of telling 70% applicants whether their proposals have been declined or recommended for funding within six months.
Verbatim copies of reviews, not including the identity of the reviewer, are provided to the PI.
Proposals recommended for funding are forwarded to the Division of Grants and Agreements for review.
Only Grants and Agreements Officers may make awards.
Notification of the award is made to the submitting organization by a DGA Officer.
What to do after a decline
32
Get your emotions out…. Read your proposal reviews and prepare
specific questions. Contact the program officer to discuss
your proposal constructively. Start rewriting your proposal right away. Polish your proposal by requesting that
faculty from your disciple and out your of discipline review it for you.
33
How to Really Learn about Programs and Process
Become a reviewer for the proposals submitted to the program Send e-mail to the lead or disciplinary
program officer, and attach a short curriculum vitae
Your name will be added to the database of potential reviewers
TUES uses many new reviewers each year, especially for Type 1
Each NSF program maintains its own reviewer files, and practices vary.
34
Scholarships in STEM (S-STEM)
Makes grants to colleges and universities to operate a scholarship project for their students
Covers all natural sciences, CS, Engineering, Math, Technology
Proposal describes student services, academic
support, administration of project—more than $ Goal is to attract and retain students in STEM
majors
Scholarships in STEM (S-STEM) (continued)
Close interaction with faculty and other students is an important part of the project; faculty PI and other faculty involvement
NSF grants up to $600,000 for up to 5 years
Program makes about 90 grants per year
Scholarships are need-based, for able students, up to $10,000 per year
Deadline: August 14, 2012.35
36
STEM Talent Expansion Program (STEP)
Increase the number of students receiving associate or baccalaureate degrees in established or emerging fields within STEM.
Many ways to do this: for example, recruiting; retention to degree; program quality; program capacity; increased diversity; undergraduate research. Emphasis on numbers
Type 1 projects are considered to be institutional efforts• Type 1A proposals from an institution that has
not previously been the lead institution on a STEP Type 1.• Type 1B proposals from an institution that has
previously been the lead institution on a STEP Type 1.
Type 2 projects are educational research on factors affecting associate or baccalaureate degree attainment in STEM.
STEM Talent Expansion Program (STEP)(continued)
STEP budget is $26M. Type 1 projects: For five years, depends
on # of undergraduate students - 5,000 or fewer, up to $500,000; 5000 to 15,000 up to $1.0 M; more than 15,000, up to $2.0 M
Type 2 projects : $1.5 million for projects of up to four years
Deadline: September 25, 2012. Leadership change: Susan Hixson has
retired, now Lee Zia and Connie Della-Piana. 37
Top Related