© 2005
The development, implementation and redesigning of a task-based language curriculum for primary
schools
Marleen Colpin & Koen Van Gorp
Centre for Language and Migration (K.U.Leuven)
© 2005
Centre for Language and Migration• Within the Flemish Educational Priority
Policy• 3 main tasks:
– research– support of teachers and teacher trainers– syllabus and curriculum development
• Both in primary and secondary education
© 2005
Flemish Educational Priority Policy• Challenge: Provide equal educational
opportunities to all children regardless of their (linguistic) background
• How? Efficient and effective language teaching especially for both L1-learners at risk and L2 learners
© 2005
Language teaching: early '90s (1)
• Language teaching doesn’t meet the needs of a diverse student population and isn’t focussed on acquiring academic language proficiency
• It is very much based on teacher-centered PPP-paradigm (presentation, practice and production)
© 2005
Language teaching: early '90s (2)
• Time-allocation: 51% focus on form(s)– 32% language awareness
»20% traditional grammar excercises
– 19% spelling– 23% reading, 10% writing, 7% speaking, 5%
listening»whereas 90-95% of the attainment
targets deal with language proficiency
© 2005
De Toren van Babbel (TvB)
• The first task-based language curriculum for primary schools in Flanders
• To meet the challenge of equal opportunities and concerns of the early '90's
• Designed from 1992 to 1995
© 2005
Starting point
• Building on experience with communicative language teaching– Focussing on language profiency
• Conceptions of 'task' as unit of analysis in syllabus design (Long & Crookes, 1993)
• Needs analysis of academic language register in primary education– tools: vocabulary list as a means to control
language input in TvB
© 2005
Task example: Who is the thief?Grandmother Mouse came home through the back door. Her arrival frightened a thief. On entering she heard him running away through the front door; she also heard a metallic tool hitting the ground. But she was too late to see the thief.Her friend the fox detective Sherlock Holmes arrived promptly. He entered through the back door accompanied by the two major suspects: the bear and the stork. They were the only persons working nearby, so one of them had to be the thief.Sherlock looked about the living room. After inspecting the front door and noticing the wrench he immediately knew who the thief was.
Who is the culprit: the bear or the stork?
© 2005
Who is the thief? (2)
© 2005
Powerful learning environmentsfor language learning
POSITIVE, SAFE CLIMATE
MEANINGFUL, RELEVANT TASKS
INTERACTIONALSUPPORT
© 2005
The concept of task• Language as a means…• … to reach a motivating goal• Involve relevant and natural language
– needs analysis of academic language– pedagogical tasks as stepping stones
• manipulations of authentic target tasks in terms of complexity and motivating power but processing and language demands resemble target tasks
• Contain language learning potential– zone of next potential, negotiated difficulty
© 2005
The concept of task (2)
• Elicit interaction and feedback: co-operative learning– interaction serves different functions
• motivate, feedback (on meaning and form), collaborative dialogue, …
– stimulating peer interaction• heterogeneous groups
– promoting task-based interaction• e.g. jigsaw, …
© 2005
The concept of task (3)
• Focus on role of the teacher:– motivating language learners
• creating a positive, safe climate
– organizing learning environment• confronting leaners with meaningful, relevant tasks
– supporting language learners• negotiate, provide feedback, stimulate peer
interaction, …
= differentiated according to learners' needs
© 2005
Focus on form & focus on forms
• Primary focus on meaning (80% of the time)
• Focus on form activities (FoF): language awareness activities– a mapping of form on function approach– grammar: insight in how language works
• Focus on forms (FoFs): technical reading abilities, spelling
© 2005
Implementation of TvB (1)
• 18% of Dutch primary schools have bought TvB (especially educational priority schools, but also other schools)
• Positive voices about– choice of themes, activities, group work and
learning methods– motivating power of tasks, texts, …
© 2005
Implementation of TvB (2)
• The problems:
– Too much, too difficult• activities, reading texts
– Too little 'real practice' (exercises)• spelling, grammar
© 2005
Implementation of TvB (3)• Some teachers' concerns were not met
– Spelling (all grades)• Additional spelling materials are used
– Technical reading (2nd and 3th grade)– Evaluation (all grades)– Differentiation in amount and complexity of
lesson materials (all grades)– Remedial teaching (all grades)– Not enough support for learner feedback
© 2005
10 years later… what has changed?
• Learning from past implementation experiences
• Taking into account new developments in CTM and task-based approach in general
© 2005
2005-2007: TotemTaal
• Second task-based language curriculum for primary schools
• Fundamental changes and choices underlying task-based curriculum beginning of 21th century
© 2005
Changes and choices
• Concept of task
• Concept of syllabus design – complexity
• The role of the teacher
• Focus on Form(s)
• Task-based language assessment
© 2005
Concept of task• Open tasks
– With a clearly defined goal– Allowing a great deal of intellectual and creative
freedom– Promoting task-based interaction– With maximal potential for learning
• Relevant tasks– With regard to the attainment goals– Task-based + Task-oriented– Pedagogical tasks: manipulate complexity, variety
and motivational power
© 2005
Examples of attainment goalsfor the end of primary education• Listening
– The pupils can understand and structure the information from an explanation or an instruction of the teacher.
• Writing– The pupils can write a report of an event,
a story or an informative text for a familiar person.
© 2005
Concept of syllabus designCriteria for selection and sequencing
• Relevance and naturalness
• Characteristics defining tasks
– settings of different parameters, each of which is a continuum of diversity and complexity
© 2005
Parameters and settings
Each task challenges pupils to…• exercise one or more of the four language
skills– listening – speaking – reading – writing
• handle a text of a certain type, meant for a certain public– informative texts / argumentative texts /
directive texts / ...– known peer / unknown peer / known adult /
unknown adult
© 2005
Parameters and settings (2)
• handle information, depending on the goal of the task, on a certain level of processing– copy - understand as such/describe - structure -
evaluate
• handle texts about different subjects, representing or revealing a different ‘world’, e.g.– from here-and-now to there-and-then– from a more concrete of a more generalizing
perspective– demanding more of less knowledge of the world– offering more or less linguistic/visual support
© 2005
Parameters and settings (3)
• … and the text (spoken or written) distinguishes itself by a certain:– vocabulary– syntax– structure– code– conventions– ...
all of which can be more of less difficult.
© 2005
Task complexity
• Overall complexity = sum of all the settings
• Defining settings allows:– to gain insight in complexity– to ‘manipulate’ complexity
• In terms of making a task easier or more difficult on one or more parameters
• In terms of building in extra support
– to control diversity
© 2005
Examples: write a report of an event• Second grade:
– write a report of the creation of an animal (on a pre-structured card)
• Fourth grade:– write a report of ‘a day in the live of the king (in a
table with hours)
• Sixth grade:– write a report of your quest to liberate Mr. Orange
(free structure)
© 2005
Examples: parameter-settings
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Public
Level of processing
Subject/world
Text/Linguistic demands
2 4 6
© 2005
Teacher support & differentiatione.g.• Help to put ideas in a row• Ask questions from the perspective of
the reader of the report• Remind of the goal of the report• Point out where the report is not
accurate, too extensive, ...• Offer a scheme for writing
© 2005
The concept of parameters and settings
• Selecting and sequencing tasks
• Support
• Evaluation
© 2005
Broad concept of evaluation
• on a permanent base as well as at specific moments throughout the school year
• on products the pupils produce as well as on their acquisition/learning process
• with more traditional tests as well as more ‘alternative’ evaluation instruments, such as observation instruments, portfolio, ...
• by the teacher as well as the pupils themselves or other pupils
Top Related