Zero Read Noise Detectors for the TMT Don Figer, Brian Ashe, John Frye, Brandon Hanold, Tom...
-
Upload
edgar-bradford -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of Zero Read Noise Detectors for the TMT Don Figer, Brian Ashe, John Frye, Brandon Hanold, Tom...
Zero Read Noise Detectors for the TMTDon Figer, Brian Ashe , John Frye, Brandon Hanold, Tom Montagliano, Don Stauffer (RIDL), Brian Aull, Bob Reich, Dan Schuette, Jim Gregory, Erik Duerr, Joseph Donnelly (MIT/LL)
MIT LL No. MS-43282, ESC No. 09-1097
2
Outline
• Motivation– Why pursue photon-counting technology?– Why use Geiger-mode avalanche photodiodes
(APDs)?
• Moore Detector for TMT• Heritage: LIDAR• Conclusions
3
Outline
• Motivation– Why pursue photon-counting technology?– Why use Geiger-mode avalanche photodiodes
(APDs)?
• Moore Detector for TMT• Heritage: LIDAR• Conclusions
4
Why pursue photon-counting technology?• Photon-counting detectors effectively have
zero read noise.• In low light applications, read noise can
dominate signal-to-noise ratio.• Many applications can become low light
applications with higher resolutions.– spectroscopy– time-resolved photometry– fast wavefront sensing and guiding
5
Detectivity (higher is better)
.)(411
2yDetectivit
1
ysensitivit
1yDetectivit
1SNRat which flux y Sensitivit
noise) read(noise)dark (flux backgroundflux signal
flux signal
dominated noise read
2,
1,
2,
2,
22
pixreadreaddarkbackgroundpix
SNR
readpixdarkpixbackgroundpix
readdarkbackinstinst
inst
nN
tQE
NtitQENn
tQE
N
NntintQENntQEN
tQEN
NtitQEFh
AtQEFh
A
tQEFh
A
N
SSNR
6
Exposure Time to SNR=1
.
)(2
)(4)()(
for t.equation SNR Solve SNR. particular areach to timeexposure
0 and 0 and 1
2
222,
4,
2
,
QEN
nN
QEN
SNRNQEnNinQENnQENSNRinQENnQENSNR
pixreadiNSNR
readpixdarkpixbackgroundpixdarkpixbackgroundpix
darkbackground
7
Example for Planet Imaging
• The exposure time required to achieve SNR=1 is dramatically reduced for a zero noise detector compared to detectors with state of the art read noise.
10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%0 6,600 2,300 1,311 900 680 544 453 388 338 300 1 7,159 2,674 1,591 1,123 865 703 591 510 448 400 2 8,486 3,457 2,141 1,547 1,209 992 841 730 645 577 3 10,148 4,363 2,760 2,016 1,587 1,309 1,113 968 857 768 4 11,954 5,312 3,402 2,500 1,976 1,633 1,392 1,212 1,074 964 5 13,830 6,281 4,053 2,990 2,369 1,961 1,673 1,459 1,293 1,161 6 15,745 7,259 4,709 3,484 2,764 2,291 1,956 1,706 1,513 1,359 7 17,684 8,244 5,368 3,979 3,161 2,621 2,239 1,954 1,734 1,558
rea
d n
ois
e
mag_star=5, mag_planet=30, R=100, i_dark=0.0010
Exposure Time (seconds) for SNR = 1
FOMQuantum Efficiency
8
Why use Geiger-Mode Avalanche Photodiodes (GM-APDs)?• produce easily distinguishable high voltage
pulse per photon• have zero “excess noise factor”• allow for hybridization and bonding to non-
optical detecting materials• allow photon counting inside each pixel for
high frame rates and time tagging• have demonstrated excellent performance for
LIDAR applications
9
Gain of an APD
1
10
100
M
Breakdown0
Ordinary photodiode
Linear-mode APD
Geiger-mode APD
Response to a photon M
1∞
I(t)
10
Geiger-Mode Imager: Photon-to-Digital Conversion
Quantum-limited sensitivityNoiseless readout Photon counting or timing
APD
Digitaltimingcircuit
Digitallyencodedphotonflight time
photon
Lensletarray
APD/CMOS array
Focal-plane
Pixel circuit
11
Outline
• Motivation– Why pursue photon-counting technology?– Why use Geiger-mode avalanche photodiodes
(APDs)?
• Moore Detector for TMT• Heritage: LIDAR• Conclusions
12
Moore Detector Project Goals
• Operational– Photon-counting– Wide dynamic range: flux limit to 108 photons/pixel/s– Streaming readout
• adaptive optics imaging • multiple target tracking
– Time delay and integrate• Technical
– Backside illumination for high fill factor– Demonstrate 25 m pitch imager with streaming, single
photon, readout
13
Moore Photon Counting ImagerOptical (Silicon) Detector Performance
Parameter Phase 1 Goal
Phase 2 Goal
Format 256x256 1024x1024
Pixel Size 25 µm 20 µm
Read Noise zero zero
Dark Current (@140 K) <10-3 e-/s/pixel <10-3 e-/s/pixel
QEa Silicon (350nm,650nm,1000nm) 30%,50%,25% 55%,70%,35%
Operating Temperature 90 K – 293 K 90 K – 293 K
Fill Factor 100% 100%
aProduct of internal QE and probability of initiating an event. Assumes antireflection coating match for wavelength region.
14
Moore Photon Counting ImagerInfrared (InGaAs) Detector Performance
Parameter Phase 1 Goal
Phase 2 Goal
Format Single pixel 1024x1024
Pixel Size 25 µm 20 µm
Read Noise zero zero
Dark Current (@140 K) TBD <10-3 e-/s/pixel
QEa (1500nm) 50% 60%
Operating Temperature 90 K – 293 K 90 K – 293 K
Fill Factor NA 100% w/o lens
aProduct of internal QE and probability of initiating an event. Assumes antireflection coating match for wavelength region.
15
Moore Detector Project Status
• A 256x256x25m readout integrated circuit is being fabricated.
• InGaAs test diodes are being fabricated.• Silicon GM-APD arrays have been fabricated and will
be bump-bonded to the new readout circuit.• Photon-counting electronics are being built.• Testing will begin later in 2009.• Depending on results, megapixel silicon or InGaAs
arrays will be developed.
16
Overview of Pixel OperationPixel Architecture
17
ROIC Pixel Layout (2x2 pixels)
2 pixels, 50 m
2 p
ixe
ls, 5
0
m
metal bump bond pad
core(active quench, discriminator, APD latch)
counter rollover latch
counters (4 pixels)
18
InGaAs Development
• 3 APD designs grown and fabricated– 2-m-wide avalanche region (all InP)– 3-m-wide avalanche region (all InP)– 2-m-wide avalanche region (InGaAs absorber)
• Room-temperature CV measurements made• Devices in packaging for low temperature
measurements
19
Outline
• Motivation– Why pursue photon-counting technology?– Why use Geiger-mode avalanche photodiodes
(APDs)?
• Moore Detector for TMT• Heritage: LIDAR• Conclusions
20
Si APD/CMOS Development History
1996 2009
APD’s Discrete 4x4 arrays
4x4 arrays wire bonded to
16-channel CMOS readout
32x32 arraysfully integrated with 32x32 CMOS readout
64 x 64 arrays 3D-integrated with 2 tiers of SOI CMOS 256 x 256 arrays
not to scale
21
• Imaging system photon starved. Each detector must precisely time a weak optical pulse.
Microchip laser
Geiger-mode APD array
Color-codedrange image
LIDAR Imaging System
22
A LIDAR Imaging Detector for NASA Planetary Missions
• These arrays will be fabricated for back-illumination with bump bonding, enabling high performance in a space-qualifiable focal plane.
• The design of the ROIC will be finished by the end of 2009, with fabrication starting in early 2010.
• Funding: $546,000 • Duration: 3 years (2008-2010)
Low field
High fieldmultiplier
Medium low field
absorber
Parameter Current Goal
Space-Qualifiable NO YES
Scalable to Large Format NO YES
CMOS ROIC Timing Resolution 250 ps 250 ps
Pixel Size 50 m 50 m
Multiplied Dark Current (@14 K) unknown <10-3 e/s/pixel
QE (350nm,650nm,1000nm)a 45%,65%,5% 45%,65%,10%
Operating Temperature 293 K 90 K – 293 K
Radiation Limit unknown 50 Krad(Si)b
Technology Readiness Levelc 2 4
23
32x32 APD/CMOS Array with Integrated GaP Microlenses
24
Laser Radar Brassboard System (Gen I)
• 4 4 APD array• External rack-mounted timing circuits• Doubled Nd:YAG passively Q-switched microchip laser
(produces 30 µJ, 250 ps pulses at = 532 nm)• Transmit/receive field of view scanned to generate 128 128 images
Taken at noontime on a sunny day
25
Conventional vs LIDAR Image
Conventional image
26
3D Imaging of Model Airplane
• Multiple-frame coincidence processing of ~3-4 frames removes isolated dark counts
• Image quality excellent due to low optical cross-talk between pixels
Airplane hanging on 6 mm rope
Color-code:1 m range display
3D Display of Processed Image,Probability of Detection Color-code
Single Frame
27
Rotatable 3D Images of Multiple Objects
• 128x128 images recorded with scanned 4x4 array at 1.06 m• Coincidence processed to remove background/dark counts• Dark blue equivalent to <2 photon average return (right image)
Color-coded by Distance Color-coded by Detection Probability
28
Outline
• Motivation– Why pursue photon-counting technology?– Why use Geiger-mode avalanche photodiodes
(APDs)?
• Moore Detector for TMT• Heritage: LIDAR• Conclusions
29
Conclusions
• Large-format photon-counting imaging detectors are within reach.
• We are funded to make 256x256 and megapixel devices.
• A 256x256 detector silicon-based array should be in testing by the end of the year.
• The devices will be implemented in a broad range of low light level and LIDAR timing applications.