WYG Transport Planning Persimmon Homes Ltd Orama Mill ...
Transcript of WYG Transport Planning Persimmon Homes Ltd Orama Mill ...
WYG Transport Planning
WYG Transport Planning part of the WYG Group creative minds safe hands
www.wyg.com
Persimmon Homes Ltd
Orama Mill, Whitworth
Transport Assessment
Report No. A067392
WYG St James Gate Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4AD
Date (December 2010)
WYG Transport Planning
WYG Transport Planning part of the WYG Group creative minds safe hands
www.wyg.com
REPORT CONTROL
Document: Transport Assessment
Project: Orama Mill, Whitworth
Client:
Job Number:
File Origin: I:\Projects\A067001 - A067500\A067392\Documents\Final Documents
Document Checking:
Primary Author David Groves Initialled: DG
Contributor Initialled:
Review By Nick Bunn Initialled: NB
Issue Date Status Checked for Issue
1 Dec 10 Planning NB
2
3
4
WYG Transport Planning
WYG Transport Planning part of the WYG Group creative minds safe hands
www.wyg.com
Contents
1 Introduction........................................................................................................................1
2 Existing Conditions ..............................................................................................................2
3 Proposed Development........................................................................................................5
4 Accessibility ........................................................................................................................6
5 Trip Generation and Assignment ........................................................................................10
6 Operational Assessment.....................................................................................................12
7 Summary..........................................................................................................................15
Appendices
Appendix A – Figures
Appendix B – Drawings
Appendix C – Accessibility Questionnaire
Appendix D – TRICS Output Files
Appendix E – PICADY Output Files
WYG Transport Planning
WYG Transport Planning part of the WYG Group creative minds safe hands
Transport Assessment
Orama Mill, Whitworth December 2010
1
1 Introduction
1.1 This Transport Assessment (TA) has been produced by WYG on behalf of Persimmon Homes
NW to accompany their planning application for a residential development of 87 homes on the
former Orama Mill site, Whitworth.
1.2 The TA has been undertaken having due regard to the advice contained within:
• Planning Policy Guidance note 13 (PPG 13) published by the Department of the
Environment, Transport and the Regions (now the Department for Transport, DfT) in March
2001.
• The DfT’s Guidance on Transport Assessment dated March 2007.
• The Manual for Streets, HMSO 2007.
1.3 A planning application (Ref: 2008/0386) was previously submitted with a Transport
Assessment in July 2008 for 105 dwellings on the Orama Mill site. The highway aspects of this
application were agreed by Lancashire county Council and no objections were recommended.
This application was refused by Rossendale Council, but no highway reasons for refusal were
offered.
1.4 This TA has been prepared solely in connection with the proposed development. Whilst every
reasonable effort has been made to ensure its accuracy, use of the following third party for
any other purpose is entirely at their own risk.
WYG Transport Planning
WYG Transport Planning part of the WYG Group creative minds safe hands
Transport Assessment
Orama Mill, Whitworth December 2010
2
2 Existing Conditions
Development Site
2.1 The proposed development site was formerly occupied by the Orama Industrial Mill, which has
recently been demolished. The development site is bounded to the north by playing fields for
Whtiworth Community High School, to the east by Cowm Park Way South, to the south by Hall
Street, Hallfold United Reform Church and Miller’s Gutter stream to the south and by the High
School at its western boundary. Figure 1 at Appendix A shows the location of the site within
its general surrounds.
2.2 The development site is currently accessed via a simple priority crossroads junction onto Hall
Street and Spodden Fold.
Local Road Network
2.3 Cowm Park Way South runs in a general south to north direction from a staggered junction
arrangement with Hall Street and Massey Croft to a crossroads junction arrangement with
Tong Lane, Tong End and Cowm Park Way North at its northern extent. Cowm Park Way
South is a street-lit single carriageway road and is typically 5.7m wide. There is footway on
the west side of the carriageway between Hall Street and Lloyd Street. There is a small
section of No Waiting At Any Time restrictions on Cowm Park Road South at its junction with
Hall Street,.
2.4 Hall Street runs in an east to west direction from its junction with the A671 Market Street to its
junction with Hall Fold. Hall Street is a street-lit single carriageway road with a typical
carriageway width of 6.7 metres. There is footway on the north side of the carriageway of
approximately 1.7 metres in width. There are No Waiting At Any Time restrictions from its
junction with Market Street to its junction with Spodden Fold. Hall Street is subject to a
20mph speed limit.
2.5 Massey Croft is a street-lit residential road and runs in a north to south alignment from its
junction with Hall Street to a cul-de-sac arrangement at its southern extent. Massey Croft has
a typical carriageway width of 5.7 metres. There is footway on the west side of the
carriageway between Hall Street and Albert Street which varies between 2 metres and 2.8
WYG Transport Planning
WYG Transport Planning part of the WYG Group creative minds safe hands
Transport Assessment
Orama Mill, Whitworth December 2010
3
metres in width. There is footway on both sides of Massey Croft as it extends southwards
from Albert Street past a series of dwellings. Massey Croft is subject to traffic calming and a
20mph speed limit. There are no waiting restrictions in place.
2.6 Spodden Fold is a residential cul-de-sac road extending southwards from Hall Street and is a
street-lit and single carriageway road of approximately 5 metres in width. There is a small
stretch of footway on the west side of the carriageway extending from Hall Street, which is 1.4
metres in width. There are no waiting restrictions on Spodden Fold.
Walking and Cycling
2.7 There is footway on most of the roads in the surrounds of the development site and there is a
Zebra crossing on Market Street approximately 25 metres north of the Hall Street/ Market
Street junction which facilitates pedestrian movement towards the town centre.
2.8 Regional Route 92 runs along Cowm Park Way South and Massey Street, connecting Rochdale
and Britannia to the south of Bacup. The route uses an old railway line and quiet sections of
road. Cowm Park Way South and much of the roads surrounding the development site are
lightly trafficked and suitable for cycling. The existing cycle network in Whitworth is shown at
Figure 2 at Appendix A.
2.9 A full description of the existing walking and cycle accessibility of the proposed development is
provided at Section 4 of this report.
Public Transport
2.10 The nearest bus stops to proposed development site are located on Hall Street and are on
both sides of the carriageway. The eastbound stop is located 240 metres from the centre of
the development site and is a flag/ pole arrangement with no timetable information. The
westbound stop is located approximately 260 metres from the centre of the development site
and is a flag/ pole arrangement with no timetable information.
2.11 A full description of the existing public transport accessibility of the proposed development is
provided at Section 4 of this report.
WYG Transport Planning
WYG Transport Planning part of the WYG Group creative minds safe hands
Transport Assessment
Orama Mill, Whitworth December 2010
4
Traffic Surveys
2.12 Denis Wilson Group commissioned an independent traffic survey company to undertake a fully
classified turning movement traffic survey of the Hall Street/ Market Street priority junction on
Thursday 19th April 2007 for both the AM and PM peaks. The surveyed flows are shown at
Figures 3 at Appendix A.
Committed Developments
2.13 Planning permission has been granted for 45 homes on land off Eastgate to be accessed off an
unnamed estate road between Eastgate and Westgate.
WYG Transport Planning
WYG Transport Planning part of the WYG Group creative minds safe hands
Transport Assessment
Orama Mill, Whitworth December 2010
5
3 Proposed Development
3.1 The development proposal consists of 87 private homes on land off Cowm Park Way South,
Whitworth. The proposed development drawing is shown at Niemen Architects Drawing:
2405-100 D in Appendix B.
3.2 The primary vehicular access will be taken via a proposed access junction off Cowm Park Way
South. Visibility splays of 2.4m x 43m can be achieved along Cowm Park Way South to both
the left and right.
3.3 There are an additional two access junctions onto Cowm Park Way South, which serve 13 and
6 dwellings respectively. There is also a small private driveway off Hall Street which serves
one dwelling.
3.4 The former Orama Mill sire access road off Hall Street will be retained as an emergency access
road, as well as for pedestrians and cyclists..
3.5 Pedestrian access will be taken via the proposed access junction off Cowm Park Way South
with 2m wide footway on both sides of the access road.
3.6 The internal arrangement has been designed in accordance with Lancashire County Council’s
(LCC’s) Residential Road Design Guide. The main spine road extending through Orama Mill
has been designed to a Type 4A Collector Road standard with a carriageway width of 5.5
metres.
3.7 There are 2 parking spaces per dwelling, which accords with the maximum parking standards
within the Joint Lancashire Structure Plan. There are also 7 visitor car parking spaces.
3.8 Niemen Architects Drawing: 2405-100 D shows speed tables on the entrance to the site either
side of the bridge over the River Spodden and then further speed tables within the site to
reinforce a 20mph design speed.
WYG Transport Planning
WYG Transport Planning part of the WYG Group creative minds safe hands
Transport Assessment
Orama Mill, Whitworth December 2010
6
4 Accessibility
4.1 The objectives of PPG 13 are “to integrate planning and transport at the national, regional,
strategic and local level to:
• promote more sustainable transport choices for both people and for moving freight;
• promote accessibility to jobs, shopping, leisure facilities and services, by public transport,
walking and cycling, and reduce the need to travel especially by car.”
Walking and Cycling
4.2 PPG 13 states walking has the potential to replace short car trips, particularly those under 2km
(i.e. approximately a 25-min walk at a typical walking speed of 1.3m per sec). Accessibility on
foot from the proposed development has been assessed.
4.3 There are footways on most of the roads in the surrounds of the development site which are
of a reasonable standard. There is a Zebra crossing on Market Street approximately 25 metres
north of the Hall Street/ Market Street junction which facilitates pedestrian movement towards
the town centre. There is a second Zebra crossing adjacent to the Market Street/ Tong Lane
junction to the north of the development site.
4.4 There is a newsagent on Hall Street which can be accessed within a 5 minute walk from the
centre of the development site and a post office on Market Street to the south of the proposed
development can be reached within a 5-10 minute walk.
4.5 There is a dental surgery to the east of the development site which is a 5 minute walk from
the centre of the site and a public house on Market Street can be accessed within a 5-10
minute walk via the Zebra crossing to the north of the Market Street/ Hall Street junction.
4.6 Whitworth Community High School can be reached within a 5-10 minute walk from the centre
of the development site. St Bartholmew’s CE Primary School can also be reached within a 5-10
minute walk and Our Lady & St Anselm’s RC Primary School is a 15 minute walk to the north
from the development site. There are good quality footpath links to all three schools.
WYG Transport Planning
WYG Transport Planning part of the WYG Group creative minds safe hands
Transport Assessment
Orama Mill, Whitworth December 2010
7
4.7 There are a number of workplaces on Lloyd Street to the north of the development site and
they can be accessed within a 5-10 minute walk of the development site via Cowm Park Way
South. There is no crossing point from Cowm Park Way South to Lloyd Street but both roads
are lightly trafficked. The Industrial Estate off Daniel Street and the employment opportunities
that lie within it can be accessed with a 10-15 minute walk to the north of the proposed
development. The route to the Industrial Estate uses a good quality, well-lit and well used
footway on Hall Street and Market Street. The works off Millfold can be accessed within a 20
minute walk of the development site.
4.8 There are several recreational opportunities within walking distance of the proposed
development site. There is a cricket pitch and football pitch within a 10 minute walk of the
development site. Whitworth Water Ski Centre can be accessed within a 15 minute walk from
the centre of the development site.
4.9 PPG 13 also states cycling has the potential to replace car trips, particularly those under 5km
(i.e. approximately a 25-min ride at a typical cycling speed of 1km per 5 mins). Accessibility
by bike from the proposed development has been assessed.
4.10 Regional Route 92 runs along Cowm Park Way South and links Rochdale, Whitworth and
Britannia to Bacup. The route uses an old railway line and quiet sections of road. Cowm Park
Way South and much of the roads surrounding the development site are lightly trafficked and
suitable for cycling.
4.11 A 15-minute bike ride from the centre of the site accesses those facilities and amenities which
are within a 25-minute walk.
4.12 The village of Shawforth to the north of Whitworth can be accessed within a 15-20 minute bike
ride from the development site and the outskirts of Britannia can be reached within a 25
minute cycle ride.
4.13 Rochdale town centre and all the services, facilities and employment opportunities that lie
within can be reached within a 25 minute cycle ride to the south of the development site.
Rochdale Infirmary can be cycled within 20 minutes as can Falinge Park High School and
Performing Arts College.
WYG Transport Planning
WYG Transport Planning part of the WYG Group creative minds safe hands
Transport Assessment
Orama Mill, Whitworth December 2010
8
4.14 Fieldhow Industrial Estate and the employment opportunities within it lies to the north of
Rochdale and can be accessed within a 20 minute cycle ride from the proposed development.
4.15 The development is accessible on foot or by bike to a number of educational, employment,
retail and leisure opportunities.
Public Transport
4.16 The Institution of Highways and Transportation’s (IHT’s) Guidelines for Providing for Public
Transport in New Developments suggests a development is considered accessible by public
transport if it is within 400m of a bus stop.
4.17 There are two bus stops on Hall Street on each side of the carriageway to the south-east of
the development site. There are also bus stops on either side of the carriageway on Market
Street which can both be accessed within a 5 minute walk of the development site. The
accessible services that call at the stops are shown in Table 4.1 and 4.2 below:
Table 4.1: Accessible Buses – Hall Street
Monday to Saturday Sunday Route No. Route Description
Daytime Evening Daytime
Easy Ride Wallbank to Rochdale
Wallbank, Whitworth, Healey, Shawclough, Rochdale Every 30 minutes
Every 30 minutes
Hourly
Table 4.2: Accessible Buses – Market Street
Monday to Saturday Sunday Route No. Route Description
Daytime Evening Daytime
Easy Ride Wallbank to Rochdale
Wallbank, Whitworth, Healey, Shawclough, Rochdale Every 30 minutes
Every 30 minutes
Hourly
Rossendale
Bus
Accrington to Rochdale Accrington, Haslingden, Rawtenstall, Waterfoot,
Bacup, Whitworth, Rochdale
Every 10 minutes
Every 30 minutes
Every 30 minutes
4.18 The existing bus services offer regular and frequent journeys to Rochdale Town Centre and to
destinations further afield
4.19 The proposed development is accessible by public transport to a range of facilities and
amenities, which would be further enhanced by routing existing services into the development
site.
WYG Transport Planning
WYG Transport Planning part of the WYG Group creative minds safe hands
Transport Assessment
Orama Mill, Whitworth December 2010
9
Accessibility Questionnaire – Residential Development
4.20 In accordance with planning applications submitted to Rossendale Borough Council, an
Accessibility Questionnaire has been completed for the development site and is included in
Appendix C.
4.21 The questionnaire demonstrates that the proposed development is at the upper threshold of
the ‘Medium’ accessibility level.
WYG Transport Planning
WYG Transport Planning part of the WYG Group creative minds safe hands
Transport Assessment
Orama Mill, Whitworth December 2010
10
5 Trip Generation and Assignment
Trip Generation
5.1 The Transport Assessment submitted by Redrow Homes Ltd as part of their planning
application derived trip generation for the scheme by netting off traffic generated by the
existing use (Orama Mill) from the proposed housing. Orama Mill has since been demolished
and therefore trip generation will be derived by the proposed housing only. The “Mixed
Private Housing” trip rates used within the Denis Wilson Group Transport Assessment (as part
of the Redrow Homes Ltd planning application) are not appropriate for a scheme which
entirely comprises private homes. The TRICS database has been interrogated to derive more
appropriate trip rates.
5.2 In accordance with DfT’s Guidance an estimation of the numbers of person trips by all modes
of travel generated from the proposed development has been made using multi modal data
extracted from the Trip Rate Information Computer System database (TRICS 2010(a)).
Private Homes
5.3 To maximise the suitability of the sites used to derive the person trip generation rates, the
following criteria were applied to the TRICS category “Houses Privately Owned”:
• Only multi modal surveys were included.
• Sites in London, Republic of Ireland, Northern Ireland and Highlands were excluded.
• Only Edge of Town sites were selected.
• Only surveys carried out on a Tuesday, Wednesday or Thursday were included.
• Only the most recent survey included for each site was included.
• Site with less than 40 dwellings and over 250 dwellings were excluded from the sample.
5.4 A total of 10 sites remained in the dataset. Average trip generation rates by private car have
been calculated from the sample, taken to be those most likely to occur. Sample TRICS output
files are attached in Appendix D.
WYG Transport Planning
WYG Transport Planning part of the WYG Group creative minds safe hands
Transport Assessment
Orama Mill, Whitworth December 2010
11
5.5 Tables 5.1 and 5.2 present those vehicle trip rates and traffic generations predicted for 87
private homes during their busiest hour in a typical weekday AM and PM commuter peak
periods, i.e. 8:00am to 9:00am and 5:00pm to 6:00pm respectively.
Table 5.1: Private Homes - Weekday AM Peak Hour, Vehicle Trip Generations
Inbound Outbound
Mode of Travel Trip Rate Trips Trip Rate Trips
Vehicles 0.164 14 0.453 39
Trip rate is per dwelling
Table 5.2: Private Homes - Weekday PM Peak Hour, Vehicle Trip Generations
Inbound Outbound
Mode of Travel Trip Rate Trips Trip Rate Trips
Vehicles 0.448 39 0.253 22
Trip rate is per dwelling
Assignment
5.6 The assignment has been based upon the trip distribution used by Dennis Wilson Group in
their Transport Assessment which assumed that 90% of development traffic would travel to/
from Hall Street/ Market Street junction and 10% to/ from Cowm Park Way South.
5.7 The trip distribution for the proposed development has been based on existing turning
proportions from the surveyed flows and these are shown at Figure 4 at Appendix A.
WYG Transport Planning
WYG Transport Planning part of the WYG Group creative minds safe hands
Transport Assessment
Orama Mill, Whitworth December 2010
12
6 Operational Assessment
Traffic Growth
6.1 The opening year is expected to be 2011 and a future year ten years hence, that is 2021.
6.2 Surveyed flows have been factored up to 2021 using DfT’s TEMPRO 6.2 program, by applying
the National Trip Model (NTM) AF09 dataset in accordance with WebTAG Unit 3.15.2 Use of
TEMPRO Data. Whitworth Ward (30UM1) was selected as the study area, and the average of
the AM peak and PM peak factors derived. The average factors used are shown at Table 6.1.
Table 6.1: Washington Ward, TEMPRO Growth Factors
AM Peak PM Peak Average
2007 to 2021 1.1001 1.1012 1.1007
Traffic Flows
6.3 The No Development scenario comprises surveyed flows factored up to the appropriate year
with the addition of the Eastgate committed development flows. There was no accompanying
Transport Assessment available for the Eastgate development, therefore the trip generation
and assignment used for the proposed development flows as outlined in Section 5 have been
used. Figure 5 at Appendix A shows the No Development Flows. The With Development
scenario comprises No Development flows, plus traffic generated by the proposed
development (Figure 6 at Appendix A refers).
Capacity Assessment
6.4 The approach of the Dennis Wilson Transport Assessment has been undertaken, whereby the
Site access/ Cowm Park Way South junction has not been assessed due to the low volumes of
traffic on Cowm Park Way South.
6.5 No Development and With Development traffic flows have been used to test the Hall Street/
Market Street priority junction using the Transport Research Laboratory’s (TRL’s) PICADY
computer program. PICADY models report the Ratio of Flow to Capacity (RFC), the average
WYG Transport Planning
WYG Transport Planning part of the WYG Group creative minds safe hands
Transport Assessment
Orama Mill, Whitworth December 2010
13
number of vehicles queuing and the average delay per vehicle for all approaches during each
15-minute interval throughout the assessment period. An RFC of less than 1.00 means the
approach is under capacity and greater than 1.00 means the approach is over capacity.
6.6 Table 6.2 shows the results of the PICADY testing for the AM and PM peak surveyed flows.
Output files are attached in Appendix E.
Table 6.2: Market Street/ Hall Street, 2007 Surveyed Flows
Weekday AM Peak Weekday PM Peak
Hall Street Max RFC
Max Q Aver Delay
0.60
1 26 secs
0.51
1 23 secs
Market Street North to
Hall Street
Max RFC
Max Q Aver Delay
0.11
0 8 secs
0.16
0 10 secs
6.7 Table 6.2 shows that the Market Street/ Hall Street junction operates within capacity in both
the AM and PM peak in the surveyed year of 2007.
6.8 Table 6.3 shows the results of the PICADY testing for the 2021 AM and PM peak No
development flows. Output files are attached in Appendix D.
Table 6.3: Market Street/ Hall Street, 2021 No Development
Weekday AM Peak Weekday PM Peak
Hall Street Max RFC Max Q
Aver Delay
0.71 3
48 secs
0.69 2
53 secs
Market Street North to Hall Street
Max RFC Max Q
Aver Delay
0.14 0
8 secs
0.21 0
11 secs
6.9 Table 6.3 shows that the Market Street/ Hall Street junction continues to operate within
capacity in both the AM and PM peak in a design year of 2021 with no development in place.
6.10 Table 6.4 shows the results of the PICADY testing for the 2021 AM and PM peak with the
addition of development generated traffic. Output files are attached in Appendix D.
WYG Transport Planning
WYG Transport Planning part of the WYG Group creative minds safe hands
Transport Assessment
Orama Mill, Whitworth December 2010
14
Table 6.4: Market Street/ Hall Street, 2021 With Development
Weekday AM Peak Weekday PM Peak
Hall Street Max RFC Max Q
Aver Delay
0.90 6
1 1/3 mins
0.76 3
53 secs
Market Street North to Hall Street
Max RFC Max Q
Aver Delay
0.15 0
8 secs
0.25 0
13 secs
6.11 Table 6.4 shows that the Market Street/ Hall Street junction continues to operate within
capacity in both the AM and PM peak in a design year of 2021 with the addition of
development generated traffic. Table 6.4 shows that in the AM peak, queues at the Hall Street
junction increase from 3 vehicles to 6 vehicles with the addition of development traffic. In the
PM peak there is an increase of 1 vehicle in the maximum queue at the Hall Street junction
with the addition of development traffic.
6.12 Table 6.4 above shows traffic generated by 87 private homes at the proposed development is
predicted to have no significant impact on operations at the Market Street/ Hall Street junction,
with the existing layout continuing to operate within capacity in 2021 and beyond. No
mitigation measures are required for capacity reasons.
WYG Transport Planning
WYG Transport Planning part of the WYG Group creative minds safe hands
Transport Assessment
Orama Mill, Whitworth December 2010
15
7 Summary
7.1 WYG were commissioned by Persimmon Homes NW to produce this Transport Assessment in
support of their proposed development fro 87 private homes on land to the west of Cowm Park
Way South, Whitworth.
7.2 Access to the development site for vehicles is to be taken via a new access junction onto
Cowm Park Way South. There will also be a further vehicle access formed onto Cowm Park
Way South and onto Hall Street. An emergency access road will be provided onto Hall Street.
7.3 The TRICS database has been interrogated to derive appropriate vehicle trip rates for the
proposed development. The development is predicted to generate 53 two-way trips in the AM
peak and 61 two-way trips in the PM peak.
7.4 Detailed capacity testing has been undertaken for the Market Street/ Hall Street junction. The
performance of the junction has been analysed, and no mitigation measures for capacity
reasons are required.
7.5 The development site is accessible on foot, by bike and by public transport, and no
improvements to existing provisions are necessary. An Accessibility Questionnaire has been
completed for the development site and demonstrates that the proposed development
achieves a ‘Medium’ score.
7.6 The proposed development accords with the key sustainable objectives of the Government’s
Planning Policy Guidance note 13, and the additional generated traffic can be readily
accommodated on the local road network such that no mitigation measures for capacity or
safety reasons are required. On these bases there are no justifiable highway reasons why
consent should not be granted for the current planning application.
WYG Transport Planning
WYG Transport Planning part of the WYG Group creative minds safe hands
Transport Assessment Orama Mill, Whitworth
December 2010 1
Appendix A – Figures
Figure 2
Orama Mill, Whitworth
Existing Cycle Network
N
KEY:
On-road route
Traffic-free route
Development Site
Regional Route 92
Route towards Britanniaand Bacup
Route towards Rochdale
Figure 3
Orama Mill, Whitworth
Surveyed Traffic Flows AM and PM Peak
NMarket Street (North)
Market Street (South)
Hall Street
53 678
42786
141
43
Market Street (North)
Market Street (South)
Hall Street
61 430
723213
88
55
AM
PM
Surveys undertaken on Thursday 19th April 2007
Figure 4
Orama Mill, Whitworth
AM and PM Peak Traffic Distribution
NMarket Street (North)
Market Street (South)
Hall Street
53%
37%
69%
21%
Market Street (North)
Market Street (South)
Hall Street
31%
59%
56%
34%
AM
PM
Milner Street
Cowm Park Way South
90%
Milner Street
Cowm Park Way South
10%
90%
10%
10%10%90%
90%
Figure 5
Orama Mill, Whitworth
2021 AM and PM Peak No Development Flows
NMarket Street (North)
Market Street (South)
Hall Street
62 746
47098
169
51
Market Street (North)
Market Street (South)
Hall Street
73 474
796247
103
65
AM
PM
Figure 6
Orama Mill, Whitworth
2021 AM and PM Peak With Development Flows
NMarket Street (North)
Market Street (South)
Hall Street
69 746
470103
195
59
Market Street (North)
Market Street (South)
Hall Street
84 474
796269
115
72
AM
PM
WYG Transport Planning
WYG Transport Planning part of the WYG Group creative minds safe hands
Transport Assessment Orama Mill, Whitworth
December 2010 2
Appendix B – Drawings
WYG Transport Planning
WYG Transport Planning part of the WYG Group creative minds safe hands
Transport Assessment Orama Mill, Whitworth
December 2010 3
Appendix C – Accessibility Questionnaire
WYG Transport Planning
WYG Transport Planning part of the WYG Group creative minds safe hands
Transport Assessment Orama Mill, Whitworth
December 2010 4
Appendix D – TRICS Output Files
TRICS 2010(a)v6.5.2 290310 B14.32 (C) 2010 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Wednesday 20/10/10
Page 1
OFF-LINE VERSION WYG Group St James Gate Newcastle Licence No: 705112
TRIP RATE CALCULATION SELECTION PARAMETERS:
Land Use : 03 - RESIDENTIAL
Category : A - HOUSES PRIVATELY OWNED
MULTI-MODAL VEHICLES
Selected regions and areas:
02 SOUTH EAST
EX ESSEX 1 days
04 EAST ANGLIA
SF SUFFOLK 1 days
05 EAST MIDLANDS
LN LINCOLNSHIRE 1 days
NT NOTTINGHAMSHIRE 1 days
06 WEST MIDLANDS
WO WORCESTERSHIRE 2 days
08 NORTH WEST
LC LANCASHIRE 2 days
09 NORTH
CB CUMBRIA 1 days
TW TYNE & WEAR 1 days
Filtering Stage 2 selection:
Parameter: Number of dwellings
Range: 40 to 237 (units: )
Public Transport Provision:
Selection by: Include all surveys
Date Range: 01/01/02 to 10/02/10
Selected survey days:
Tuesday 4 days
Wednesday 2 days
Thursday 4 days
Selected survey types:
Manual count 10 days
Directional ATC Count 0 days
Selected Locations:
Edge of Town 10
Selected Location Sub Categories:
Residential Zone 8
No Sub Category 2
TRICS 2010(a)v6.5.2 290310 B14.32 (C) 2010 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Wednesday 20/10/10
Page 2
OFF-LINE VERSION WYG Group St James Gate Newcastle Licence No: 705112
LIST OF SITES relevant to selection parameters
1 CB-03-A-03 SEMI DETACHED, WORKINGTON CUMBRIA
HAWKSHEAD AVENUE
WORKINGTON
Edge of Town
Residential Zone
Total Number of dwellings: 4 0
2 EX-03-A-01 SEMI-DET., STANFORD-LE-HOPE ESSEX
MILTON ROAD
CORRINGHAM
STANFORD-LE-HOPE
Edge of Town
Residential Zone
Total Number of dwellings: 2 3 7
3 LC-03-A-22 BUNGALOWS, BLACKPOOL LANCASHIRE
CLIFTON DRIVE NORTH
BLACKPOOL
Edge of Town
Residential Zone
Total Number of dwellings: 9 8
4 LC-03-A-29 DETACHED/SEMI D., BLACKBURN LANCASHIRE
REVIDGE ROAD
FOUR LANE ENDS
BLACKBURN
Edge of Town
Residential Zone
Total Number of dwellings: 1 8 5
5 LN-03-A-01 MIXED HOUSES, LINCOLN LINCOLNSHIRE
BRANT ROAD
BRACEBRIDGE
LINCOLN
Edge of Town
Residential Zone
Total Number of dwellings: 1 5 0
6 NT-03-A-03 SEMI DETACHED,KIRKBY-IN-ASHFD NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
B6018 SUTTON ROAD
KIRKBY-IN-ASHFIELD
Edge of Town
Residential Zone
Total Number of dwellings: 1 6 6
7 SF-03-A-02 SEMI DET./TERRACED, IPSWICH SUFFOLK
STOKE PARK DRIVE
MAIDENHALL
IPSWICH
Edge of Town
Residential Zone
Total Number of dwellings: 2 3 0
8 TW-03-A-01 SEMI DETACHED, SUNDERLAND TYNE & WEAR
LEECHMERE ROAD
HILLVIEW
SUNDERLAND
Edge of Town
Residential Zone
Total Number of dwellings: 8 1
9 WO-03-A-02 SEMI DETACHED, REDDITCH WORCESTERSHIRE
MEADOWHILL ROAD
REDDITCH
Edge of Town
No Sub Category
Total Number of dwellings: 4 8
TRICS 2010(a)v6.5.2 290310 B14.32 (C) 2010 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Wednesday 20/10/10
Page 3
OFF-LINE VERSION WYG Group St James Gate Newcastle Licence No: 705112
LIST OF SITES relevant to selection parameters (Cont.)
10 WO-03-A-06 DET./TERRACED, BROMSGROVE WORCESTERSHIRE
ST GODWALDS ROAD
ASTON FIELDS
BROMSGROVE
Edge of Town
No Sub Category
Total Number of dwellings: 2 3 2
TRICS 2010(a)v6.5.2 290310 B14.32 (C) 2010 JMP Consultants Ltd on behalf of the TRICS Consortium Wednesday 20/10/10
Page 4
OFF-LINE VERSION WYG Group St James Gate Newcastle Licence No: 705112
TRIP RATE for Land Use 03 - RESIDENTIAL/A - HOUSES PRIVATELY OWNED
MULTI-MODAL VEHICLES
Calculation factor: 1 DWELLS
BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period
ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS
No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip
Time Range Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate
0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.00000:00 - 01:00
0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.00001:00 - 02:00
0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.00002:00 - 03:00
0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.00003:00 - 04:00
0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.00004:00 - 05:00
0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.00005:00 - 06:00
0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.00006:00 - 07:00
10 147 0.092 10 147 0.303 10 147 0.39507:00 - 08:00
10 147 0.164 10 147 0.453 10 147 0.61708:00 - 09:00
10 147 0.194 10 147 0.229 10 147 0.42309:00 - 10:00
10 147 0.156 10 147 0.207 10 147 0.36310:00 - 11:00
10 147 0.208 10 147 0.192 10 147 0.40011:00 - 12:00
10 147 0.213 10 147 0.212 10 147 0.42512:00 - 13:00
10 147 0.187 10 147 0.183 10 147 0.37013:00 - 14:00
10 147 0.209 10 147 0.185 10 147 0.39414:00 - 15:00
10 147 0.339 10 147 0.239 10 147 0.57815:00 - 16:00
10 147 0.354 10 147 0.222 10 147 0.57616:00 - 17:00
10 147 0.448 10 147 0.253 10 147 0.70117:00 - 18:00
10 147 0.305 10 147 0.244 10 147 0.54918:00 - 19:00
0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.00019:00 - 20:00
0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.00020:00 - 21:00
0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.00021:00 - 22:00
0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.00022:00 - 23:00
0 0 0.000 0 0 0.000 0 0 0.00023:00 - 24:00
Total Rates: 2.869 2.922 5.791
Parameter summary
Trip rate parameter range selected: 40 - 237 (units: )
Survey date date range: 01/01/02 - 10/02/10
Number of weekdays (Monday-Friday): 10
Number of Saturdays: 0
Number of Sundays: 0
Surveys manually removed from selection: 4
WYG Transport Planning
WYG Transport Planning part of the WYG Group creative minds safe hands
Transport Assessment Orama Mill, Whitworth
December 2010 5
Appendix E – PICADY Output Files
TRL LIMITED
(C) COPYRIGHT 2006
CAPACITIES, QUEUES, AND DELAYS AT 3 OR 4-ARM MAJOR/MINOR PRIORITY JUNCTIONS
PICADY 5.0 ANALYSIS PROGRAM RELEASE 3.0 (JUNE 2006)
ADAPTED FROM PICADY/3 WHICH IS CROWN COPYRIGHT
BY PERMISSION OF THE CONTROLLER OF HMSO
--------------------------------------------------------
FOR SALES AND DISTRIBUTION INFORMATION, PROGRAM ADVICE AND MAINTENANCE CONTACT:
TRL SOFTWARE BUREAU
TEL: CROWTHORNE (01344) 770758, FAX: 770864
EMAIL: [email protected]
--------------------------------------------------------
THE USER OF THIS COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR THE SOLUTION OF AN ENGINEERING PROBLEM IS IN NO WAY RELIEVED OF HIS RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CORRECTNESS OF THE SOLUTION
Run with file:- "I:\Projects\A067001 - A067500\A067392\Analysis\Traffic Models\2007 AM Surveyed Flows.vpi"
(drive-on-the-left ) at 14:39:07 on Saturday, 23 October 2010
.RUN INFORMATION
***************
RUN TITLE: Market Street Hall Street 2007 AM surveyed LOCATION: Whitworth
DATE: 21/10/10
CLIENT: Persimmon Homes
ENUMERATOR: david.groves [37-31]
JOB NUMBER: A067392
STATUS: On-going
DESCRIPTION:
.MAJOR/MINOR JUNCTION CAPACITY AND DELAY
***************************************
INPUT DATA
----------
MAJOR ROAD (ARM C) --------------------- MAJOR ROAD (ARM A) I
I
I
I
I
I
MINOR ROAD (ARM B)
ARM A IS Market Street
ARM B IS Hall Street
ARM C IS Market Street
STREAM LABELLING CONVENTION
---------------------------
STREAM A-B CONTAINS TRAFFIC GOING FROM ARM A TO ARM B
STREAM B-AC CONTAINS TRAFFIC GOING FROM ARM B TO ARM A AND TO ARM C
ETC.
.GEOMETRIC DATA
--------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
I DATA ITEM I MINOR ROAD B I ----------------------------------------------------------------
I TOTAL MAJOR ROAD CARRIAGEWAY WIDTH I ( W ) 8.50 M. I
I CENTRAL RESERVE WIDTH I (WCR ) 0.00 M. I
I I I I MAJOR ROAD RIGHT TURN - WIDTH I (WC-B) 2.20 M. I
I - VISIBILITY I (VC-B) 120.0 M. I
I - BLOCKS TRAFFIC I NO I
I I I
I MINOR ROAD - VISIBILITY TO LEFT I (VB-C) 31.0 M. I
I - VISIBILITY TO RIGHT I (VB-A) 48.0 M. I
I - LANE 1 WIDTH I (WB-C) 3.50 M. I
I - LANE 2 WIDTH I (WB-A) 0.00 M. I ----------------------------------------------------------------
.SLOPES AND INTERCEPT --------------------
(NB:Streams may be combined, in which case capacity
will be adjusted )
---------------------------------------------------------
I Intercept For Slope For Opposing Slope For Opposing I
I Stream B-C Stream A-C Stream A-B I
--------------------------------------------------------- I 686.90 0.24 0.09 I
---------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I Intercept For Slope For Opposing Slope For Opposing Slope For Opposing Slope For OpposingI
I Stream B-A Stream A-C Stream A-B Stream C-A Stream C-B I
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I 536.83 0.22 0.09 0.14 0.31 I --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------- I Intercept For Slope For Opposing Slope For Opposing I
I Stream C-B Stream A-C Stream A-B I
--------------------------------------------------------- I 643.46 0.22 0.22 I
---------------------------------------------------------
NB These values do not allow for any site specific corrections
.
.TRAFFIC DEMAND DATA
-------------------
.-----------------------
I ARM I FLOW SCALE(%) I
----------------------- I A I 100 I
I B I 100 I
I C I 100 I
-----------------------
Demand set: Market Street Hall Street 2007 AM surveyed
TIME PERIOD BEGINS 07.45 AND ENDS 09.15
LENGTH OF TIME PERIOD - 90 MINUTES.
LENGTH OF TIME SEGMENT - 15 MINUTES.
DEMAND FLOW PROFILES ARE SYNTHESISED FROM TURNING COUNT DATA
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
I I NUMBER OF MINUTES FROM START WHEN I RATE OF FLOW (VEH/MIN) I
I ARM I FLOW STARTS I TOP OF PEAK I FLOW STOPS I BEFORE I AT TOP I AFTER I I I TO RISE I IS REACHED I FALLING I PEAK I OF PEAK I PEAK I
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
I ARM A I 15.00 I 45.00 I 75.00 I 6.41 I 9.62 I 6.41 I
I ARM B I 15.00 I 45.00 I 75.00 I 2.30 I 3.45 I 2.30 I I ARM C I 15.00 I 45.00 I 75.00 I 9.14 I 13.71 I 9.14 I
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
-----------------------------------------------------------
I I TURNING PROPORTIONS I
I I TURNING COUNTS (VEH/HR) I
I I (PERCENTAGE OF H.V.S) I I --------------------------------------
I TIME I FROM/TO I ARM A I ARM B I ARM C I
-----------------------------------------------------------
I 07.45 - 09.15 I I I I I I I ARM A I 0.000 I 0.168 I 0.832 I
I I I 0.0 I 86.0 I 427.0 I
I I I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I
I I I I I I I I ARM B I 0.766 I 0.000 I 0.234 I
I I I 141.0 I 0.0 I 43.0 I
I I I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I
I I I I I I
I I ARM C I 0.927 I 0.073 I 0.000 I
I I I 678.0 I 53.0 I 0.0 I
I I I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I I I I I I I
-----------------------------------------------------------
TURNING PROPORTIONS ARE CALCULATED FROM TURNING COUNT DATA
THE PERCENTAGE OF HEAVY VEHICLES VARIES OVER TURNING MOVEMENTS
. QUEUE AND DELAY INFORMATION FOR EACH 15 MIN TIME SEGMENT --------------------------------------------------------
FOR COMBINED DEMAND SETS
AND FOR TIME PERIOD 1
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDESTRIAN START END DELAY GEOMETRIC DELAY AVERAGE DELAY I
I (VEH/MIN) (VEH/MIN) CAPACITY FLOW QUEUE QUEUE (VEH.MIN/ (VEH.MIN/ PER ARRIVING I
I (RFC) (PEDS/MIN) (VEHS) (VEHS) TIME SEGMENT) TIME SEGMENT) VEHICLE (MIN) I
I 07.45-08.00 I
I B-AC 2.31 6.89 0.335 0.00 0.49 6.9 0.22 I
I C-A 8.51 I
I C-B 0.67 9.29 0.072 0.00 0.08 1.1 0.12 I
I A-B 1.08 I I A-C 5.36 I
I I
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDESTRIAN START END DELAY GEOMETRIC DELAY AVERAGE DELAY I
I (VEH/MIN) (VEH/MIN) CAPACITY FLOW QUEUE QUEUE (VEH.MIN/ (VEH.MIN/ PER ARRIVING I I (RFC) (PEDS/MIN) (VEHS) (VEHS) TIME SEGMENT) TIME SEGMENT) VEHICLE (MIN) I
I 08.00-08.15 I
I B-AC 2.76 6.38 0.432 0.49 0.74 10.5 0.27 I
I C-A 10.16 I
I C-B 0.79 9.02 0.088 0.08 0.10 1.4 0.12 I
I A-B 1.29 I
I A-C 6.40 I
I I .------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDESTRIAN START END DELAY GEOMETRIC DELAY AVERAGE DELAY I
I (VEH/MIN) (VEH/MIN) CAPACITY FLOW QUEUE QUEUE (VEH.MIN/ (VEH.MIN/ PER ARRIVING I
I (RFC) (PEDS/MIN) (VEHS) (VEHS) TIME SEGMENT) TIME SEGMENT) VEHICLE (MIN) I
I 08.15-08.30 I
I B-AC 3.38 5.67 0.596 0.74 1.38 18.9 0.42 I I C-A 12.44 I
I C-B 0.97 8.63 0.113 0.10 0.13 1.8 0.13 I
I A-B 1.58 I
I A-C 7.84 I I I
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDESTRIAN START END DELAY GEOMETRIC DELAY AVERAGE DELAY I
I (VEH/MIN) (VEH/MIN) CAPACITY FLOW QUEUE QUEUE (VEH.MIN/ (VEH.MIN/ PER ARRIVING I
I (RFC) (PEDS/MIN) (VEHS) (VEHS) TIME SEGMENT) TIME SEGMENT) VEHICLE (MIN) I
I 08.30-08.45 I
I B-AC 3.38 5.67 0.596 1.38 1.43 21.1 0.43 I
I C-A 12.44 I
I C-B 0.97 8.63 0.113 0.13 0.13 1.9 0.13 I I A-B 1.58 I
I A-C 7.84 I
I I
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDESTRIAN START END DELAY GEOMETRIC DELAY AVERAGE DELAY I
I (VEH/MIN) (VEH/MIN) CAPACITY FLOW QUEUE QUEUE (VEH.MIN/ (VEH.MIN/ PER ARRIVING I I (RFC) (PEDS/MIN) (VEHS) (VEHS) TIME SEGMENT) TIME SEGMENT) VEHICLE (MIN) I
I 08.45-09.00 I
I B-AC 2.76 6.38 0.432 1.43 0.78 12.6 0.28 I
I C-A 10.16 I I C-B 0.79 9.02 0.088 0.13 0.10 1.5 0.12 I
I A-B 1.29 I
I A-C 6.40 I
I I
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDESTRIAN START END DELAY GEOMETRIC DELAY AVERAGE DELAY I
I (VEH/MIN) (VEH/MIN) CAPACITY FLOW QUEUE QUEUE (VEH.MIN/ (VEH.MIN/ PER ARRIVING I
I (RFC) (PEDS/MIN) (VEHS) (VEHS) TIME SEGMENT) TIME SEGMENT) VEHICLE (MIN) I
I 09.00-09.15 I I B-AC 2.31 6.89 0.335 0.78 0.51 8.1 0.22 I
I C-A 8.51 I
I C-B 0.67 9.29 0.072 0.10 0.08 1.2 0.12 I
I A-B 1.08 I I A-C 5.36 I
I I
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
QUEUE FOR STREAM B-AC
-------------------------
TIME SEGMENT NO. OF
ENDING VEHICLES IN QUEUE
08.00 0.5
08.15 0.7 *
08.30 1.4 * 08.45 1.4 *
09.00 0.8 *
09.15 0.5 *
. QUEUE FOR STREAM C-B
-------------------------
TIME SEGMENT NO. OF
ENDING VEHICLES
IN QUEUE
08.00 0.1
08.15 0.1 08.30 0.1
08.45 0.1
09.00 0.1
09.15 0.1 .
QUEUEING DELAY INFORMATION OVER WHOLE PERIOD
--------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I STREAM I TOTAL DEMAND I * QUEUEING * I * INCLUSIVE QUEUEING * I
I I I * DELAY * I * DELAY * I
I I----------------------------------------------------------------I I I (VEH) (VEH/H) I (MIN) (MIN/VEH) I (MIN) (MIN/VEH) I
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I B-AC I 253.3 I 168.8 I 78.2 I 0.31 I 78.2 I 0.31 I
I C-A I 933.2 I 622.1 I I I I I
I C-B I 73.0 I 48.6 I 8.9 I 0.12 I 8.9 I 0.12 I
I A-B I 118.4 I 78.9 I I I I I
I A-C I 587.7 I 391.8 I I I I I
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- I ALL I 1965.5 I 1310.4 I 87.1 I 0.04 I 87.1 I 0.04 I
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
* DELAY IS THAT OCCURRING ONLY WITHIN THE TIME PERIOD .
* INCLUSIVE DELAY INCLUDES DELAY SUFFERED BY VEHICLES WHICH ARE STILL QUEUEING AFTER THE END OF THE TIME PERIOD.
* THESE WILL ONLY BE SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT IF THERE IS A LARGE QUEUE REMAINING AT THE END OF THE TIME PERIOD.
END OF JOB
============================================= end of file ===============================================
TRL LIMITED
(C) COPYRIGHT 2006
CAPACITIES, QUEUES, AND DELAYS AT 3 OR 4-ARM MAJOR/MINOR PRIORITY JUNCTIONS
PICADY 5.0 ANALYSIS PROGRAM RELEASE 3.0 (JUNE 2006)
ADAPTED FROM PICADY/3 WHICH IS CROWN COPYRIGHT
BY PERMISSION OF THE CONTROLLER OF HMSO
--------------------------------------------------------
FOR SALES AND DISTRIBUTION INFORMATION, PROGRAM ADVICE AND MAINTENANCE CONTACT:
TRL SOFTWARE BUREAU
TEL: CROWTHORNE (01344) 770758, FAX: 770864
EMAIL: [email protected]
--------------------------------------------------------
THE USER OF THIS COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR THE SOLUTION OF AN ENGINEERING PROBLEM IS IN NO WAY RELIEVED OF HIS RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CORRECTNESS OF THE SOLUTION
Run with file:- "I:\Projects\A067001 - A067500\A067392\Analysis\Traffic Models\2007 PM Surveyed Flows.vpi"
(drive-on-the-left ) at 14:44:08 on Saturday, 23 October 2010
.RUN INFORMATION
***************
RUN TITLE: Market Street Hall Street 2007 PM surveyed LOCATION: Whitworth
DATE: 21/10/10
CLIENT: Persimmon Homes
ENUMERATOR: david.groves [37-31]
JOB NUMBER: A067392
STATUS: On-going
DESCRIPTION:
.MAJOR/MINOR JUNCTION CAPACITY AND DELAY
***************************************
INPUT DATA
----------
MAJOR ROAD (ARM C) --------------------- MAJOR ROAD (ARM A) I
I
I
I
I
I
MINOR ROAD (ARM B)
ARM A IS Market Street
ARM B IS Hall Street
ARM C IS Market Street
STREAM LABELLING CONVENTION
---------------------------
STREAM A-B CONTAINS TRAFFIC GOING FROM ARM A TO ARM B
STREAM B-AC CONTAINS TRAFFIC GOING FROM ARM B TO ARM A AND TO ARM C
ETC.
.GEOMETRIC DATA
--------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
I DATA ITEM I MINOR ROAD B I ----------------------------------------------------------------
I TOTAL MAJOR ROAD CARRIAGEWAY WIDTH I ( W ) 8.50 M. I
I CENTRAL RESERVE WIDTH I (WCR ) 0.00 M. I
I I I I MAJOR ROAD RIGHT TURN - WIDTH I (WC-B) 2.20 M. I
I - VISIBILITY I (VC-B) 120.0 M. I
I - BLOCKS TRAFFIC I NO I
I I I
I MINOR ROAD - VISIBILITY TO LEFT I (VB-C) 31.0 M. I
I - VISIBILITY TO RIGHT I (VB-A) 48.0 M. I
I - LANE 1 WIDTH I (WB-C) 3.50 M. I
I - LANE 2 WIDTH I (WB-A) 0.00 M. I ----------------------------------------------------------------
.SLOPES AND INTERCEPT --------------------
(NB:Streams may be combined, in which case capacity
will be adjusted )
---------------------------------------------------------
I Intercept For Slope For Opposing Slope For Opposing I
I Stream B-C Stream A-C Stream A-B I
--------------------------------------------------------- I 686.90 0.24 0.09 I
---------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I Intercept For Slope For Opposing Slope For Opposing Slope For Opposing Slope For OpposingI
I Stream B-A Stream A-C Stream A-B Stream C-A Stream C-B I
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I 536.83 0.22 0.09 0.14 0.31 I --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------- I Intercept For Slope For Opposing Slope For Opposing I
I Stream C-B Stream A-C Stream A-B I
--------------------------------------------------------- I 643.46 0.22 0.22 I
---------------------------------------------------------
NB These values do not allow for any site specific corrections
.
.TRAFFIC DEMAND DATA
-------------------
.-----------------------
I ARM I FLOW SCALE(%) I
----------------------- I A I 100 I
I B I 100 I
I C I 100 I
-----------------------
Demand set: Market Street Hall Street 2007 AM surveyed
TIME PERIOD BEGINS 16.45 AND ENDS 18.15
LENGTH OF TIME PERIOD - 90 MINUTES.
LENGTH OF TIME SEGMENT - 15 MINUTES.
DEMAND FLOW PROFILES ARE SYNTHESISED FROM TURNING COUNT DATA
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
I I NUMBER OF MINUTES FROM START WHEN I RATE OF FLOW (VEH/MIN) I
I ARM I FLOW STARTS I TOP OF PEAK I FLOW STOPS I BEFORE I AT TOP I AFTER I I I TO RISE I IS REACHED I FALLING I PEAK I OF PEAK I PEAK I
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
I ARM A I 15.00 I 45.00 I 75.00 I 11.70 I 17.55 I 11.70 I
I ARM B I 15.00 I 45.00 I 75.00 I 1.79 I 2.68 I 1.79 I I ARM C I 15.00 I 45.00 I 75.00 I 6.14 I 9.21 I 6.14 I
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
-----------------------------------------------------------
I I TURNING PROPORTIONS I
I I TURNING COUNTS (VEH/HR) I
I I (PERCENTAGE OF H.V.S) I I --------------------------------------
I TIME I FROM/TO I ARM A I ARM B I ARM C I
-----------------------------------------------------------
I 16.45 - 18.15 I I I I I I I ARM A I 0.000 I 0.228 I 0.772 I
I I I 0.0 I 213.0 I 723.0 I
I I I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I
I I I I I I I I ARM B I 0.615 I 0.000 I 0.385 I
I I I 88.0 I 0.0 I 55.0 I
I I I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I
I I I I I I
I I ARM C I 0.876 I 0.124 I 0.000 I
I I I 430.0 I 61.0 I 0.0 I
I I I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I I I I I I I
-----------------------------------------------------------
TURNING PROPORTIONS ARE CALCULATED FROM TURNING COUNT DATA
THE PERCENTAGE OF HEAVY VEHICLES VARIES OVER TURNING MOVEMENTS
. QUEUE AND DELAY INFORMATION FOR EACH 15 MIN TIME SEGMENT --------------------------------------------------------
FOR COMBINED DEMAND SETS
AND FOR TIME PERIOD 1
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDESTRIAN START END DELAY GEOMETRIC DELAY AVERAGE DELAY I
I (VEH/MIN) (VEH/MIN) CAPACITY FLOW QUEUE QUEUE (VEH.MIN/ (VEH.MIN/ PER ARRIVING I
I (RFC) (PEDS/MIN) (VEHS) (VEHS) TIME SEGMENT) TIME SEGMENT) VEHICLE (MIN) I
I 16.45-17.00 I
I B-AC 1.79 6.67 0.269 0.00 0.36 5.1 0.20 I
I C-A 5.40 I
I C-B 0.77 8.11 0.094 0.00 0.10 1.5 0.14 I
I A-B 2.67 I I A-C 9.07 I
I I
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDESTRIAN START END DELAY GEOMETRIC DELAY AVERAGE DELAY I
I (VEH/MIN) (VEH/MIN) CAPACITY FLOW QUEUE QUEUE (VEH.MIN/ (VEH.MIN/ PER ARRIVING I I (RFC) (PEDS/MIN) (VEHS) (VEHS) TIME SEGMENT) TIME SEGMENT) VEHICLE (MIN) I
I 17.00-17.15 I
I B-AC 2.14 6.04 0.355 0.36 0.54 7.7 0.26 I
I C-A 6.44 I
I C-B 0.91 7.61 0.120 0.10 0.14 2.0 0.15 I
I A-B 3.19 I
I A-C 10.83 I
I I .------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDESTRIAN START END DELAY GEOMETRIC DELAY AVERAGE DELAY I
I (VEH/MIN) (VEH/MIN) CAPACITY FLOW QUEUE QUEUE (VEH.MIN/ (VEH.MIN/ PER ARRIVING I
I (RFC) (PEDS/MIN) (VEHS) (VEHS) TIME SEGMENT) TIME SEGMENT) VEHICLE (MIN) I
I 17.15-17.30 I
I B-AC 2.62 5.16 0.508 0.54 0.99 13.6 0.38 I I C-A 7.89 I
I C-B 1.12 6.91 0.162 0.14 0.19 2.8 0.17 I
I A-B 3.91 I
I A-C 13.27 I I I
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDESTRIAN START END DELAY GEOMETRIC DELAY AVERAGE DELAY I
I (VEH/MIN) (VEH/MIN) CAPACITY FLOW QUEUE QUEUE (VEH.MIN/ (VEH.MIN/ PER ARRIVING I
I (RFC) (PEDS/MIN) (VEHS) (VEHS) TIME SEGMENT) TIME SEGMENT) VEHICLE (MIN) I
I 17.30-17.45 I
I B-AC 2.62 5.16 0.509 0.99 1.01 15.0 0.39 I
I C-A 7.89 I
I C-B 1.12 6.91 0.162 0.19 0.19 2.9 0.17 I I A-B 3.91 I
I A-C 13.27 I
I I
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDESTRIAN START END DELAY GEOMETRIC DELAY AVERAGE DELAY I
I (VEH/MIN) (VEH/MIN) CAPACITY FLOW QUEUE QUEUE (VEH.MIN/ (VEH.MIN/ PER ARRIVING I I (RFC) (PEDS/MIN) (VEHS) (VEHS) TIME SEGMENT) TIME SEGMENT) VEHICLE (MIN) I
I 17.45-18.00 I
I B-AC 2.14 6.04 0.355 1.01 0.56 9.0 0.26 I
I C-A 6.44 I I C-B 0.91 7.61 0.120 0.19 0.14 2.1 0.15 I
I A-B 3.19 I
I A-C 10.83 I
I I
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDESTRIAN START END DELAY GEOMETRIC DELAY AVERAGE DELAY I
I (VEH/MIN) (VEH/MIN) CAPACITY FLOW QUEUE QUEUE (VEH.MIN/ (VEH.MIN/ PER ARRIVING I
I (RFC) (PEDS/MIN) (VEHS) (VEHS) TIME SEGMENT) TIME SEGMENT) VEHICLE (MIN) I
I 18.00-18.15 I I B-AC 1.79 6.67 0.269 0.56 0.37 5.9 0.21 I
I C-A 5.40 I
I C-B 0.77 8.11 0.094 0.14 0.11 1.6 0.14 I
I A-B 2.67 I I A-C 9.07 I
I I
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
QUEUE FOR STREAM B-AC
-------------------------
TIME SEGMENT NO. OF
ENDING VEHICLES IN QUEUE
17.00 0.4
17.15 0.5 *
17.30 1.0 * 17.45 1.0 *
18.00 0.6 *
18.15 0.4
. QUEUE FOR STREAM C-B
-------------------------
TIME SEGMENT NO. OF
ENDING VEHICLES
IN QUEUE
17.00 0.1
17.15 0.1 17.30 0.2
17.45 0.2
18.00 0.1
18.15 0.1 .
QUEUEING DELAY INFORMATION OVER WHOLE PERIOD
--------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I STREAM I TOTAL DEMAND I * QUEUEING * I * INCLUSIVE QUEUEING * I
I I I * DELAY * I * DELAY * I
I I----------------------------------------------------------------I I I (VEH) (VEH/H) I (MIN) (MIN/VEH) I (MIN) (MIN/VEH) I
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I B-AC I 196.8 I 131.2 I 56.3 I 0.29 I 56.3 I 0.29 I
I C-A I 591.9 I 394.6 I I I I I
I C-B I 84.0 I 56.0 I 12.9 I 0.15 I 12.9 I 0.15 I
I A-B I 293.2 I 195.5 I I I I I
I A-C I 995.2 I 663.4 I I I I I
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- I ALL I 2161.0 I 1440.7 I 69.1 I 0.03 I 69.1 I 0.03 I
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
* DELAY IS THAT OCCURRING ONLY WITHIN THE TIME PERIOD .
* INCLUSIVE DELAY INCLUDES DELAY SUFFERED BY VEHICLES WHICH ARE STILL QUEUEING AFTER THE END OF THE TIME PERIOD.
* THESE WILL ONLY BE SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT IF THERE IS A LARGE QUEUE REMAINING AT THE END OF THE TIME PERIOD.
END OF JOB
============================================= end of file ===============================================
TRL LIMITED
(C) COPYRIGHT 2006
CAPACITIES, QUEUES, AND DELAYS AT 3 OR 4-ARM MAJOR/MINOR PRIORITY JUNCTIONS
PICADY 5.0 ANALYSIS PROGRAM RELEASE 3.0 (JUNE 2006)
ADAPTED FROM PICADY/3 WHICH IS CROWN COPYRIGHT
BY PERMISSION OF THE CONTROLLER OF HMSO
--------------------------------------------------------
FOR SALES AND DISTRIBUTION INFORMATION, PROGRAM ADVICE AND MAINTENANCE CONTACT:
TRL SOFTWARE BUREAU
TEL: CROWTHORNE (01344) 770758, FAX: 770864
EMAIL: [email protected]
--------------------------------------------------------
THE USER OF THIS COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR THE SOLUTION OF AN ENGINEERING PROBLEM IS IN NO WAY RELIEVED OF HIS RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CORRECTNESS OF THE SOLUTION
Run with file:- "I:\Projects\A067001 - A067500\A067392\Analysis\Traffic Models\2021 AM No Development Flows.vpi"
(drive-on-the-left ) at 15:22:48 on Saturday, 23 October 2010
.RUN INFORMATION
***************
RUN TITLE: Market Street Hall Street 2021 AM No Development LOCATION: Whitworth
DATE: 21/10/10
CLIENT: Persimmon Homes
ENUMERATOR: david.groves [37-31]
JOB NUMBER: A067392
STATUS: On-going
DESCRIPTION:
.MAJOR/MINOR JUNCTION CAPACITY AND DELAY
***************************************
INPUT DATA
----------
MAJOR ROAD (ARM C) --------------------- MAJOR ROAD (ARM A) I
I
I
I
I
I
MINOR ROAD (ARM B)
ARM A IS Market Street
ARM B IS Hall Street
ARM C IS Market Street
STREAM LABELLING CONVENTION
---------------------------
STREAM A-B CONTAINS TRAFFIC GOING FROM ARM A TO ARM B
STREAM B-AC CONTAINS TRAFFIC GOING FROM ARM B TO ARM A AND TO ARM C
ETC.
.GEOMETRIC DATA
--------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
I DATA ITEM I MINOR ROAD B I ----------------------------------------------------------------
I TOTAL MAJOR ROAD CARRIAGEWAY WIDTH I ( W ) 8.50 M. I
I CENTRAL RESERVE WIDTH I (WCR ) 0.00 M. I
I I I I MAJOR ROAD RIGHT TURN - WIDTH I (WC-B) 2.20 M. I
I - VISIBILITY I (VC-B) 120.0 M. I
I - BLOCKS TRAFFIC I NO I
I I I
I MINOR ROAD - VISIBILITY TO LEFT I (VB-C) 31.0 M. I
I - VISIBILITY TO RIGHT I (VB-A) 48.0 M. I
I - LANE 1 WIDTH I (WB-C) 3.50 M. I
I - LANE 2 WIDTH I (WB-A) 0.00 M. I ----------------------------------------------------------------
.SLOPES AND INTERCEPT --------------------
(NB:Streams may be combined, in which case capacity
will be adjusted )
---------------------------------------------------------
I Intercept For Slope For Opposing Slope For Opposing I
I Stream B-C Stream A-C Stream A-B I
--------------------------------------------------------- I 686.90 0.24 0.09 I
---------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I Intercept For Slope For Opposing Slope For Opposing Slope For Opposing Slope For OpposingI
I Stream B-A Stream A-C Stream A-B Stream C-A Stream C-B I
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I 536.83 0.22 0.09 0.14 0.31 I --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------- I Intercept For Slope For Opposing Slope For Opposing I
I Stream C-B Stream A-C Stream A-B I
--------------------------------------------------------- I 643.46 0.22 0.22 I
---------------------------------------------------------
NB These values do not allow for any site specific corrections
.
.TRAFFIC DEMAND DATA
-------------------
.-----------------------
I ARM I FLOW SCALE(%) I
----------------------- I A I 100 I
I B I 100 I
I C I 100 I
-----------------------
Demand set: Market Street Hall Street 2007 AM surveyed
TIME PERIOD BEGINS 07.45 AND ENDS 09.15
LENGTH OF TIME PERIOD - 90 MINUTES.
LENGTH OF TIME SEGMENT - 15 MINUTES.
DEMAND FLOW PROFILES ARE SYNTHESISED FROM TURNING COUNT DATA
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
I I NUMBER OF MINUTES FROM START WHEN I RATE OF FLOW (VEH/MIN) I
I ARM I FLOW STARTS I TOP OF PEAK I FLOW STOPS I BEFORE I AT TOP I AFTER I I I TO RISE I IS REACHED I FALLING I PEAK I OF PEAK I PEAK I
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
I ARM A I 15.00 I 45.00 I 75.00 I 7.13 I 10.69 I 7.13 I
I ARM B I 15.00 I 45.00 I 75.00 I 2.75 I 4.13 I 2.75 I I ARM C I 15.00 I 45.00 I 75.00 I 10.10 I 15.15 I 10.10 I
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
-----------------------------------------------------------
I I TURNING PROPORTIONS I
I I TURNING COUNTS (VEH/HR) I
I I (PERCENTAGE OF H.V.S) I I --------------------------------------
I TIME I FROM/TO I ARM A I ARM B I ARM C I
-----------------------------------------------------------
I 07.45 - 09.15 I I I I I I I ARM A I 0.000 I 0.175 I 0.825 I
I I I 0.0 I 100.0 I 470.0 I
I I I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I
I I I I I I I I ARM B I 0.768 I 0.000 I 0.232 I
I I I 169.0 I 0.0 I 51.0 I
I I I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I
I I I I I I
I I ARM C I 0.923 I 0.077 I 0.000 I
I I I 746.0 I 62.0 I 0.0 I
I I I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I I I I I I I
-----------------------------------------------------------
TURNING PROPORTIONS ARE CALCULATED FROM TURNING COUNT DATA
THE PERCENTAGE OF HEAVY VEHICLES VARIES OVER TURNING MOVEMENTS
. QUEUE AND DELAY INFORMATION FOR EACH 15 MIN TIME SEGMENT --------------------------------------------------------
FOR COMBINED DEMAND SETS
AND FOR TIME PERIOD 1
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDESTRIAN START END DELAY GEOMETRIC DELAY AVERAGE DELAY I
I (VEH/MIN) (VEH/MIN) CAPACITY FLOW QUEUE QUEUE (VEH.MIN/ (VEH.MIN/ PER ARRIVING I
I (RFC) (PEDS/MIN) (VEHS) (VEHS) TIME SEGMENT) TIME SEGMENT) VEHICLE (MIN) I
I 07.45-08.00 I
I B-AC 2.76 6.60 0.418 0.00 0.70 9.7 0.25 I
I C-A 9.36 I
I C-B 0.78 9.14 0.085 0.00 0.09 1.3 0.12 I
I A-B 1.25 I I A-C 5.90 I
I I
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDESTRIAN START END DELAY GEOMETRIC DELAY AVERAGE DELAY I
I (VEH/MIN) (VEH/MIN) CAPACITY FLOW QUEUE QUEUE (VEH.MIN/ (VEH.MIN/ PER ARRIVING I I (RFC) (PEDS/MIN) (VEHS) (VEHS) TIME SEGMENT) TIME SEGMENT) VEHICLE (MIN) I
I 08.00-08.15 I
I B-AC 3.30 6.03 0.546 0.70 1.15 16.0 0.36 I
I C-A 11.18 I
I C-B 0.93 8.83 0.105 0.09 0.12 1.7 0.13 I
I A-B 1.50 I
I A-C 7.04 I
I I .------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDESTRIAN START END DELAY GEOMETRIC DELAY AVERAGE DELAY I
I (VEH/MIN) (VEH/MIN) CAPACITY FLOW QUEUE QUEUE (VEH.MIN/ (VEH.MIN/ PER ARRIVING I
I (RFC) (PEDS/MIN) (VEHS) (VEHS) TIME SEGMENT) TIME SEGMENT) VEHICLE (MIN) I
I 08.15-08.30 I
I B-AC 4.04 5.24 0.771 1.15 2.81 35.6 0.71 I I C-A 13.69 I
I C-B 1.14 8.40 0.135 0.12 0.16 2.3 0.14 I
I A-B 1.84 I
I A-C 8.62 I I I
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDESTRIAN START END DELAY GEOMETRIC DELAY AVERAGE DELAY I
I (VEH/MIN) (VEH/MIN) CAPACITY FLOW QUEUE QUEUE (VEH.MIN/ (VEH.MIN/ PER ARRIVING I
I (RFC) (PEDS/MIN) (VEHS) (VEHS) TIME SEGMENT) TIME SEGMENT) VEHICLE (MIN) I
I 08.30-08.45 I
I B-AC 4.04 5.23 0.771 2.81 3.04 44.2 0.80 I
I C-A 13.69 I
I C-B 1.14 8.40 0.135 0.16 0.16 2.3 0.14 I I A-B 1.84 I
I A-C 8.62 I
I I
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDESTRIAN START END DELAY GEOMETRIC DELAY AVERAGE DELAY I
I (VEH/MIN) (VEH/MIN) CAPACITY FLOW QUEUE QUEUE (VEH.MIN/ (VEH.MIN/ PER ARRIVING I I (RFC) (PEDS/MIN) (VEHS) (VEHS) TIME SEGMENT) TIME SEGMENT) VEHICLE (MIN) I
I 08.45-09.00 I
I B-AC 3.30 6.03 0.546 3.04 1.27 21.5 0.40 I
I C-A 11.18 I I C-B 0.93 8.83 0.105 0.16 0.12 1.8 0.13 I
I A-B 1.50 I
I A-C 7.04 I
I I
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDESTRIAN START END DELAY GEOMETRIC DELAY AVERAGE DELAY I
I (VEH/MIN) (VEH/MIN) CAPACITY FLOW QUEUE QUEUE (VEH.MIN/ (VEH.MIN/ PER ARRIVING I
I (RFC) (PEDS/MIN) (VEHS) (VEHS) TIME SEGMENT) TIME SEGMENT) VEHICLE (MIN) I
I 09.00-09.15 I I B-AC 2.76 6.60 0.418 1.27 0.74 11.8 0.27 I
I C-A 9.36 I
I C-B 0.78 9.14 0.085 0.12 0.09 1.4 0.12 I
I A-B 1.25 I I A-C 5.90 I
I I
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
QUEUE FOR STREAM B-AC
-------------------------
TIME SEGMENT NO. OF
ENDING VEHICLES IN QUEUE
08.00 0.7 *
08.15 1.1 *
08.30 2.8 *** 08.45 3.0 ***
09.00 1.3 *
09.15 0.7 *
. QUEUE FOR STREAM C-B
-------------------------
TIME SEGMENT NO. OF
ENDING VEHICLES
IN QUEUE
08.00 0.1
08.15 0.1 08.30 0.2
08.45 0.2
09.00 0.1
09.15 0.1 .
QUEUEING DELAY INFORMATION OVER WHOLE PERIOD
--------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I STREAM I TOTAL DEMAND I * QUEUEING * I * INCLUSIVE QUEUEING * I
I I I * DELAY * I * DELAY * I
I I----------------------------------------------------------------I I I (VEH) (VEH/H) I (MIN) (MIN/VEH) I (MIN) (MIN/VEH) I
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I B-AC I 302.8 I 201.9 I 138.7 I 0.46 I 138.7 I 0.46 I
I C-A I 1026.8 I 684.5 I I I I I
I C-B I 85.3 I 56.9 I 10.9 I 0.13 I 10.9 I 0.13 I
I A-B I 137.6 I 91.8 I I I I I
I A-C I 646.9 I 431.3 I I I I I
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- I ALL I 2199.5 I 1466.4 I 149.6 I 0.07 I 149.6 I 0.07 I
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
* DELAY IS THAT OCCURRING ONLY WITHIN THE TIME PERIOD .
* INCLUSIVE DELAY INCLUDES DELAY SUFFERED BY VEHICLES WHICH ARE STILL QUEUEING AFTER THE END OF THE TIME PERIOD.
* THESE WILL ONLY BE SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT IF THERE IS A LARGE QUEUE REMAINING AT THE END OF THE TIME PERIOD.
END OF JOB
============================================= end of file ===============================================
TRL LIMITED
(C) COPYRIGHT 2006
CAPACITIES, QUEUES, AND DELAYS AT 3 OR 4-ARM MAJOR/MINOR PRIORITY JUNCTIONS
PICADY 5.0 ANALYSIS PROGRAM RELEASE 3.0 (JUNE 2006)
ADAPTED FROM PICADY/3 WHICH IS CROWN COPYRIGHT
BY PERMISSION OF THE CONTROLLER OF HMSO
--------------------------------------------------------
FOR SALES AND DISTRIBUTION INFORMATION, PROGRAM ADVICE AND MAINTENANCE CONTACT:
TRL SOFTWARE BUREAU
TEL: CROWTHORNE (01344) 770758, FAX: 770864
EMAIL: [email protected]
--------------------------------------------------------
THE USER OF THIS COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR THE SOLUTION OF AN ENGINEERING PROBLEM IS IN NO WAY RELIEVED OF HIS RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CORRECTNESS OF THE SOLUTION
Run with file:- "I:\Projects\A067001 - A067500\A067392\Analysis\Traffic Models\2021 AM With Development Flows.vpi"
(drive-on-the-left ) at 13:35:54 on Monday, 6 December 2010
.RUN INFORMATION
***************
RUN TITLE: Market Street Hall Street 2021 AM With Development LOCATION: Whitworth
DATE: 21/10/10
CLIENT: Persimmon Homes
ENUMERATOR: david.groves [37-31]
JOB NUMBER: A067392
STATUS: On-going
DESCRIPTION:
.MAJOR/MINOR JUNCTION CAPACITY AND DELAY
***************************************
INPUT DATA
----------
MAJOR ROAD (ARM C) --------------------- MAJOR ROAD (ARM A) I
I
I
I
I
I
MINOR ROAD (ARM B)
ARM A IS Market Street
ARM B IS Hall Street
ARM C IS Market Street
STREAM LABELLING CONVENTION
---------------------------
STREAM A-B CONTAINS TRAFFIC GOING FROM ARM A TO ARM B
STREAM B-AC CONTAINS TRAFFIC GOING FROM ARM B TO ARM A AND TO ARM C
ETC.
.GEOMETRIC DATA
--------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
I DATA ITEM I MINOR ROAD B I ----------------------------------------------------------------
I TOTAL MAJOR ROAD CARRIAGEWAY WIDTH I ( W ) 8.50 M. I
I CENTRAL RESERVE WIDTH I (WCR ) 0.00 M. I
I I I I MAJOR ROAD RIGHT TURN - WIDTH I (WC-B) 2.20 M. I
I - VISIBILITY I (VC-B) 120.0 M. I
I - BLOCKS TRAFFIC I NO I
I I I
I MINOR ROAD - VISIBILITY TO LEFT I (VB-C) 31.0 M. I
I - VISIBILITY TO RIGHT I (VB-A) 48.0 M. I
I - LANE 1 WIDTH I (WB-C) 3.50 M. I
I - LANE 2 WIDTH I (WB-A) 0.00 M. I ----------------------------------------------------------------
.SLOPES AND INTERCEPT --------------------
(NB:Streams may be combined, in which case capacity
will be adjusted )
---------------------------------------------------------
I Intercept For Slope For Opposing Slope For Opposing I
I Stream B-C Stream A-C Stream A-B I
--------------------------------------------------------- I 686.90 0.24 0.09 I
---------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I Intercept For Slope For Opposing Slope For Opposing Slope For Opposing Slope For OpposingI
I Stream B-A Stream A-C Stream A-B Stream C-A Stream C-B I
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I 536.83 0.22 0.09 0.14 0.31 I --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------- I Intercept For Slope For Opposing Slope For Opposing I
I Stream C-B Stream A-C Stream A-B I
--------------------------------------------------------- I 643.46 0.22 0.22 I
---------------------------------------------------------
NB These values do not allow for any site specific corrections
.
.TRAFFIC DEMAND DATA
-------------------
.-----------------------
I ARM I FLOW SCALE(%) I
----------------------- I A I 100 I
I B I 100 I
I C I 100 I
-----------------------
Demand set: Market Street Hall Street 2007 AM surveyed
TIME PERIOD BEGINS 07.45 AND ENDS 09.15
LENGTH OF TIME PERIOD - 90 MINUTES.
LENGTH OF TIME SEGMENT - 15 MINUTES.
DEMAND FLOW PROFILES ARE SYNTHESISED FROM TURNING COUNT DATA
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
I I NUMBER OF MINUTES FROM START WHEN I RATE OF FLOW (VEH/MIN) I
I ARM I FLOW STARTS I TOP OF PEAK I FLOW STOPS I BEFORE I AT TOP I AFTER I I I TO RISE I IS REACHED I FALLING I PEAK I OF PEAK I PEAK I
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
I ARM A I 15.00 I 45.00 I 75.00 I 7.16 I 10.74 I 7.16 I
I ARM B I 15.00 I 45.00 I 75.00 I 3.19 I 4.78 I 3.19 I I ARM C I 15.00 I 45.00 I 75.00 I 10.19 I 15.28 I 10.19 I
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
-----------------------------------------------------------
I I TURNING PROPORTIONS I
I I TURNING COUNTS (VEH/HR) I
I I (PERCENTAGE OF H.V.S) I I --------------------------------------
I TIME I FROM/TO I ARM A I ARM B I ARM C I
-----------------------------------------------------------
I 07.45 - 09.15 I I I I I I I ARM A I 0.000 I 0.180 I 0.820 I
I I I 0.0 I 103.0 I 470.0 I
I I I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I
I I I I I I I I ARM B I 0.769 I 0.000 I 0.231 I
I I I 196.0 I 0.0 I 59.0 I
I I I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I
I I I I I I
I I ARM C I 0.915 I 0.085 I 0.000 I
I I I 746.0 I 69.0 I 0.0 I
I I I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I I I I I I I
-----------------------------------------------------------
TURNING PROPORTIONS ARE CALCULATED FROM TURNING COUNT DATA
THE PERCENTAGE OF HEAVY VEHICLES VARIES OVER TURNING MOVEMENTS
. QUEUE AND DELAY INFORMATION FOR EACH 15 MIN TIME SEGMENT --------------------------------------------------------
FOR COMBINED DEMAND SETS
AND FOR TIME PERIOD 1
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDESTRIAN START END DELAY GEOMETRIC DELAY AVERAGE DELAY I
I (VEH/MIN) (VEH/MIN) CAPACITY FLOW QUEUE QUEUE (VEH.MIN/ (VEH.MIN/ PER ARRIVING I
I (RFC) (PEDS/MIN) (VEHS) (VEHS) TIME SEGMENT) TIME SEGMENT) VEHICLE (MIN) I
I 07.45-08.00 I
I B-AC 3.20 6.57 0.487 0.00 0.91 12.5 0.29 I
I C-A 9.36 I
I C-B 0.87 9.13 0.095 0.00 0.10 1.5 0.12 I
I A-B 1.29 I I A-C 5.90 I
I I
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDESTRIAN START END DELAY GEOMETRIC DELAY AVERAGE DELAY I
I (VEH/MIN) (VEH/MIN) CAPACITY FLOW QUEUE QUEUE (VEH.MIN/ (VEH.MIN/ PER ARRIVING I I (RFC) (PEDS/MIN) (VEHS) (VEHS) TIME SEGMENT) TIME SEGMENT) VEHICLE (MIN) I
I 08.00-08.15 I
I B-AC 3.82 6.00 0.637 0.91 1.63 22.2 0.44 I
I C-A 11.18 I
I C-B 1.03 8.82 0.117 0.10 0.13 1.9 0.13 I
I A-B 1.54 I
I A-C 7.04 I
I I .------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDESTRIAN START END DELAY GEOMETRIC DELAY AVERAGE DELAY I
I (VEH/MIN) (VEH/MIN) CAPACITY FLOW QUEUE QUEUE (VEH.MIN/ (VEH.MIN/ PER ARRIVING I
I (RFC) (PEDS/MIN) (VEHS) (VEHS) TIME SEGMENT) TIME SEGMENT) VEHICLE (MIN) I
I 08.15-08.30 I
I B-AC 4.68 5.19 0.902 1.63 5.23 59.8 1.09 I I C-A 13.69 I
I C-B 1.27 8.39 0.151 0.13 0.18 2.6 0.14 I
I A-B 1.89 I
I A-C 8.62 I I I
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDESTRIAN START END DELAY GEOMETRIC DELAY AVERAGE DELAY I
I (VEH/MIN) (VEH/MIN) CAPACITY FLOW QUEUE QUEUE (VEH.MIN/ (VEH.MIN/ PER ARRIVING I
I (RFC) (PEDS/MIN) (VEHS) (VEHS) TIME SEGMENT) TIME SEGMENT) VEHICLE (MIN) I
I 08.30-08.45 I
I B-AC 4.68 5.19 0.902 5.23 6.30 87.4 1.46 I
I C-A 13.69 I
I C-B 1.27 8.39 0.151 0.18 0.18 2.6 0.14 I I A-B 1.89 I
I A-C 8.62 I
I I
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDESTRIAN START END DELAY GEOMETRIC DELAY AVERAGE DELAY I
I (VEH/MIN) (VEH/MIN) CAPACITY FLOW QUEUE QUEUE (VEH.MIN/ (VEH.MIN/ PER ARRIVING I I (RFC) (PEDS/MIN) (VEHS) (VEHS) TIME SEGMENT) TIME SEGMENT) VEHICLE (MIN) I
I 08.45-09.00 I
I B-AC 3.82 6.00 0.637 6.30 1.91 37.6 0.60 I
I C-A 11.18 I I C-B 1.03 8.82 0.117 0.18 0.13 2.1 0.13 I
I A-B 1.54 I
I A-C 7.04 I
I I
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDESTRIAN START END DELAY GEOMETRIC DELAY AVERAGE DELAY I
I (VEH/MIN) (VEH/MIN) CAPACITY FLOW QUEUE QUEUE (VEH.MIN/ (VEH.MIN/ PER ARRIVING I
I (RFC) (PEDS/MIN) (VEHS) (VEHS) TIME SEGMENT) TIME SEGMENT) VEHICLE (MIN) I
I 09.00-09.15 I I B-AC 3.20 6.57 0.487 1.91 0.98 15.9 0.31 I
I C-A 9.36 I
I C-B 0.87 9.13 0.095 0.13 0.11 1.6 0.12 I
I A-B 1.29 I I A-C 5.90 I
I I
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
QUEUE FOR STREAM B-AC
-------------------------
TIME SEGMENT NO. OF
ENDING VEHICLES IN QUEUE
08.00 0.9 *
08.15 1.6 **
08.30 5.2 ***** 08.45 6.3 ******
09.00 1.9 **
09.15 1.0 *
. QUEUE FOR STREAM C-B
-------------------------
TIME SEGMENT NO. OF
ENDING VEHICLES
IN QUEUE
08.00 0.1
08.15 0.1 08.30 0.2
08.45 0.2
09.00 0.1
09.15 0.1 .
QUEUEING DELAY INFORMATION OVER WHOLE PERIOD
--------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I STREAM I TOTAL DEMAND I * QUEUEING * I * INCLUSIVE QUEUEING * I
I I I * DELAY * I * DELAY * I
I I----------------------------------------------------------------I I I (VEH) (VEH/H) I (MIN) (MIN/VEH) I (MIN) (MIN/VEH) I
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I B-AC I 351.0 I 234.0 I 235.5 I 0.67 I 235.6 I 0.67 I
I C-A I 1026.8 I 684.5 I I I I I
I C-B I 95.0 I 63.3 I 12.3 I 0.13 I 12.3 I 0.13 I
I A-B I 141.8 I 94.5 I I I I I
I A-C I 646.9 I 431.3 I I I I I
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- I ALL I 2261.5 I 1507.6 I 247.9 I 0.11 I 247.9 I 0.11 I
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
* DELAY IS THAT OCCURRING ONLY WITHIN THE TIME PERIOD .
* INCLUSIVE DELAY INCLUDES DELAY SUFFERED BY VEHICLES WHICH ARE STILL QUEUEING AFTER THE END OF THE TIME PERIOD.
* THESE WILL ONLY BE SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT IF THERE IS A LARGE QUEUE REMAINING AT THE END OF THE TIME PERIOD.
END OF JOB
============================================= end of file ===============================================
TRL LIMITED
(C) COPYRIGHT 2006
CAPACITIES, QUEUES, AND DELAYS AT 3 OR 4-ARM MAJOR/MINOR PRIORITY JUNCTIONS
PICADY 5.0 ANALYSIS PROGRAM RELEASE 3.0 (JUNE 2006)
ADAPTED FROM PICADY/3 WHICH IS CROWN COPYRIGHT
BY PERMISSION OF THE CONTROLLER OF HMSO
--------------------------------------------------------
FOR SALES AND DISTRIBUTION INFORMATION, PROGRAM ADVICE AND MAINTENANCE CONTACT:
TRL SOFTWARE BUREAU
TEL: CROWTHORNE (01344) 770758, FAX: 770864
EMAIL: [email protected]
--------------------------------------------------------
THE USER OF THIS COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR THE SOLUTION OF AN ENGINEERING PROBLEM IS IN NO WAY RELIEVED OF HIS RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CORRECTNESS OF THE SOLUTION
Run with file:- "I:\Projects\A067001 - A067500\A067392\Analysis\Traffic Models\2021 PM No Development Flows.vpi"
(drive-on-the-left ) at 15:24:42 on Saturday, 23 October 2010
.RUN INFORMATION
***************
RUN TITLE: Market Street Hall Street 2021 PM No Development Flows LOCATION: Whitworth
DATE: 21/10/10
CLIENT: Persimmon Homes
ENUMERATOR: david.groves [37-31]
JOB NUMBER: A067392
STATUS: On-going
DESCRIPTION:
.MAJOR/MINOR JUNCTION CAPACITY AND DELAY
***************************************
INPUT DATA
----------
MAJOR ROAD (ARM C) --------------------- MAJOR ROAD (ARM A) I
I
I
I
I
I
MINOR ROAD (ARM B)
ARM A IS Market Street
ARM B IS Hall Street
ARM C IS Market Street
STREAM LABELLING CONVENTION
---------------------------
STREAM A-B CONTAINS TRAFFIC GOING FROM ARM A TO ARM B
STREAM B-AC CONTAINS TRAFFIC GOING FROM ARM B TO ARM A AND TO ARM C
ETC.
.GEOMETRIC DATA
--------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
I DATA ITEM I MINOR ROAD B I ----------------------------------------------------------------
I TOTAL MAJOR ROAD CARRIAGEWAY WIDTH I ( W ) 8.50 M. I
I CENTRAL RESERVE WIDTH I (WCR ) 0.00 M. I
I I I I MAJOR ROAD RIGHT TURN - WIDTH I (WC-B) 2.20 M. I
I - VISIBILITY I (VC-B) 120.0 M. I
I - BLOCKS TRAFFIC I NO I
I I I
I MINOR ROAD - VISIBILITY TO LEFT I (VB-C) 31.0 M. I
I - VISIBILITY TO RIGHT I (VB-A) 48.0 M. I
I - LANE 1 WIDTH I (WB-C) 3.50 M. I
I - LANE 2 WIDTH I (WB-A) 0.00 M. I ----------------------------------------------------------------
.SLOPES AND INTERCEPT --------------------
(NB:Streams may be combined, in which case capacity
will be adjusted )
---------------------------------------------------------
I Intercept For Slope For Opposing Slope For Opposing I
I Stream B-C Stream A-C Stream A-B I
--------------------------------------------------------- I 686.90 0.24 0.09 I
---------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I Intercept For Slope For Opposing Slope For Opposing Slope For Opposing Slope For OpposingI
I Stream B-A Stream A-C Stream A-B Stream C-A Stream C-B I
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I 536.83 0.22 0.09 0.14 0.31 I
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------
I Intercept For Slope For Opposing Slope For Opposing I I Stream C-B Stream A-C Stream A-B I
---------------------------------------------------------
I 643.46 0.22 0.22 I ---------------------------------------------------------
NB These values do not allow for any site specific corrections
.
.TRAFFIC DEMAND DATA
-------------------
.-----------------------
I ARM I FLOW SCALE(%) I
-----------------------
I A I 100 I I B I 100 I
I C I 100 I
-----------------------
Demand set: Market Street Hall Street 2007 AM surveyed
TIME PERIOD BEGINS 16.45 AND ENDS 18.15
LENGTH OF TIME PERIOD - 90 MINUTES.
LENGTH OF TIME SEGMENT - 15 MINUTES.
DEMAND FLOW PROFILES ARE SYNTHESISED FROM TURNING COUNT DATA
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
I I NUMBER OF MINUTES FROM START WHEN I RATE OF FLOW (VEH/MIN) I
I ARM I FLOW STARTS I TOP OF PEAK I FLOW STOPS I BEFORE I AT TOP I AFTER I
I I TO RISE I IS REACHED I FALLING I PEAK I OF PEAK I PEAK I -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
I ARM A I 15.00 I 45.00 I 75.00 I 13.04 I 19.56 I 13.04 I
I ARM B I 15.00 I 45.00 I 75.00 I 2.10 I 3.15 I 2.10 I
I ARM C I 15.00 I 45.00 I 75.00 I 6.84 I 10.26 I 6.84 I -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
-----------------------------------------------------------
I I TURNING PROPORTIONS I
I I TURNING COUNTS (VEH/HR) I
I I (PERCENTAGE OF H.V.S) I
I -------------------------------------- I TIME I FROM/TO I ARM A I ARM B I ARM C I
-----------------------------------------------------------
I 16.45 - 18.15 I I I I I
I I ARM A I 0.000 I 0.237 I 0.763 I I I I 0.0 I 247.0 I 796.0 I
I I I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I
I I I I I I
I I ARM B I 0.613 I 0.000 I 0.387 I I I I 103.0 I 0.0 I 65.0 I
I I I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I
I I I I I I
I I ARM C I 0.867 I 0.133 I 0.000 I
I I I 474.0 I 73.0 I 0.0 I
I I I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I
I I I I I I -----------------------------------------------------------
TURNING PROPORTIONS ARE CALCULATED FROM TURNING COUNT DATA
THE PERCENTAGE OF HEAVY VEHICLES VARIES OVER TURNING MOVEMENTS
. QUEUE AND DELAY INFORMATION FOR EACH 15 MIN TIME SEGMENT
-------------------------------------------------------- FOR COMBINED DEMAND SETS
AND FOR TIME PERIOD 1
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDESTRIAN START END DELAY GEOMETRIC DELAY AVERAGE DELAY I I (VEH/MIN) (VEH/MIN) CAPACITY FLOW QUEUE QUEUE (VEH.MIN/ (VEH.MIN/ PER ARRIVING I
I (RFC) (PEDS/MIN) (VEHS) (VEHS) TIME SEGMENT) TIME SEGMENT) VEHICLE (MIN) I
I 16.45-17.00 I
I B-AC 2.11 6.32 0.334 0.00 0.49 6.9 0.23 I
I C-A 5.95 I
I C-B 0.92 7.82 0.117 0.00 0.13 1.9 0.14 I
I A-B 3.10 I
I A-C 9.99 I I I
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDESTRIAN START END DELAY GEOMETRIC DELAY AVERAGE DELAY I
I (VEH/MIN) (VEH/MIN) CAPACITY FLOW QUEUE QUEUE (VEH.MIN/ (VEH.MIN/ PER ARRIVING I
I (RFC) (PEDS/MIN) (VEHS) (VEHS) TIME SEGMENT) TIME SEGMENT) VEHICLE (MIN) I I 17.00-17.15 I
I B-AC 2.52 5.61 0.448 0.49 0.78 11.1 0.32 I
I C-A 7.10 I
I C-B 1.09 7.25 0.151 0.13 0.18 2.6 0.16 I
I A-B 3.70 I
I A-C 11.93 I
I I
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDESTRIAN START END DELAY GEOMETRIC DELAY AVERAGE DELAY I
I (VEH/MIN) (VEH/MIN) CAPACITY FLOW QUEUE QUEUE (VEH.MIN/ (VEH.MIN/ PER ARRIVING I
I (RFC) (PEDS/MIN) (VEHS) (VEHS) TIME SEGMENT) TIME SEGMENT) VEHICLE (MIN) I
I 17.15-17.30 I
I B-AC 3.08 4.61 0.668 0.78 1.80 23.7 0.60 I I C-A 8.70 I
I C-B 1.34 6.47 0.207 0.18 0.26 3.7 0.19 I
I A-B 4.53 I
I A-C 14.61 I I I
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDESTRIAN START END DELAY GEOMETRIC DELAY AVERAGE DELAY I
I (VEH/MIN) (VEH/MIN) CAPACITY FLOW QUEUE QUEUE (VEH.MIN/ (VEH.MIN/ PER ARRIVING I
I (RFC) (PEDS/MIN) (VEHS) (VEHS) TIME SEGMENT) TIME SEGMENT) VEHICLE (MIN) I
I 17.30-17.45 I
I B-AC 3.08 4.61 0.668 1.80 1.90 27.9 0.64 I
I C-A 8.70 I
I C-B 1.34 6.47 0.207 0.26 0.26 3.9 0.19 I I A-B 4.53 I
I A-C 14.61 I
I I
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDESTRIAN START END DELAY GEOMETRIC DELAY AVERAGE DELAY I
I (VEH/MIN) (VEH/MIN) CAPACITY FLOW QUEUE QUEUE (VEH.MIN/ (VEH.MIN/ PER ARRIVING I I (RFC) (PEDS/MIN) (VEHS) (VEHS) TIME SEGMENT) TIME SEGMENT) VEHICLE (MIN) I
I 17.45-18.00 I
I B-AC 2.52 5.61 0.449 1.90 0.84 13.9 0.34 I
I C-A 7.10 I I C-B 1.09 7.25 0.151 0.26 0.18 2.8 0.16 I
I A-B 3.70 I
I A-C 11.93 I
I I
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDESTRIAN START END DELAY GEOMETRIC DELAY AVERAGE DELAY I
I (VEH/MIN) (VEH/MIN) CAPACITY FLOW QUEUE QUEUE (VEH.MIN/ (VEH.MIN/ PER ARRIVING I
I (RFC) (PEDS/MIN) (VEHS) (VEHS) TIME SEGMENT) TIME SEGMENT) VEHICLE (MIN) I
I 18.00-18.15 I I B-AC 2.11 6.31 0.334 0.84 0.51 8.1 0.24 I
I C-A 5.95 I
I C-B 0.92 7.82 0.117 0.18 0.13 2.1 0.14 I
I A-B 3.10 I I A-C 9.99 I
I I
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
QUEUE FOR STREAM B-AC
-------------------------
TIME SEGMENT NO. OF
ENDING VEHICLES IN QUEUE
17.00 0.5
17.15 0.8 *
17.30 1.8 ** 17.45 1.9 **
18.00 0.8 *
18.15 0.5 *
. QUEUE FOR STREAM C-B
-------------------------
TIME SEGMENT NO. OF
ENDING VEHICLES
IN QUEUE
17.00 0.1
17.15 0.2 17.30 0.3
17.45 0.3
18.00 0.2
18.15 0.1 .
QUEUEING DELAY INFORMATION OVER WHOLE PERIOD
--------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I STREAM I TOTAL DEMAND I * QUEUEING * I * INCLUSIVE QUEUEING * I
I I I * DELAY * I * DELAY * I
I I----------------------------------------------------------------I I I (VEH) (VEH/H) I (MIN) (MIN/VEH) I (MIN) (MIN/VEH) I
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I B-AC I 231.2 I 154.2 I 91.5 I 0.40 I 91.5 I 0.40 I
I C-A I 652.4 I 435.0 I I I I I
I C-B I 100.5 I 67.0 I 16.9 I 0.17 I 16.9 I 0.17 I
I A-B I 340.0 I 226.7 I I I I I
I A-C I 1095.6 I 730.4 I I I I I
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- I ALL I 2419.8 I 1613.2 I 108.4 I 0.04 I 108.4 I 0.04 I
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
* DELAY IS THAT OCCURRING ONLY WITHIN THE TIME PERIOD .
* INCLUSIVE DELAY INCLUDES DELAY SUFFERED BY VEHICLES WHICH ARE STILL QUEUEING AFTER THE END OF THE TIME PERIOD.
* THESE WILL ONLY BE SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT IF THERE IS A LARGE QUEUE REMAINING AT THE END OF THE TIME PERIOD.
END OF JOB
============================================= end of file ===============================================
TRL LIMITED
(C) COPYRIGHT 2006
CAPACITIES, QUEUES, AND DELAYS AT 3 OR 4-ARM MAJOR/MINOR PRIORITY JUNCTIONS
PICADY 5.0 ANALYSIS PROGRAM RELEASE 3.0 (JUNE 2006)
ADAPTED FROM PICADY/3 WHICH IS CROWN COPYRIGHT
BY PERMISSION OF THE CONTROLLER OF HMSO
--------------------------------------------------------
FOR SALES AND DISTRIBUTION INFORMATION, PROGRAM ADVICE AND MAINTENANCE CONTACT:
TRL SOFTWARE BUREAU
TEL: CROWTHORNE (01344) 770758, FAX: 770864
EMAIL: [email protected]
--------------------------------------------------------
THE USER OF THIS COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR THE SOLUTION OF AN ENGINEERING PROBLEM IS IN NO WAY RELIEVED OF HIS RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CORRECTNESS OF THE SOLUTION
Run with file:- "I:\Projects\A067001 - A067500\A067392\Analysis\Traffic Models\2021 PM With Development Flows.vpi"
(drive-on-the-left ) at 13:43:20 on Monday, 6 December 2010
.RUN INFORMATION
***************
RUN TITLE: Market Street Hall Street 2021 PM With Development Flows LOCATION: Whitworth
DATE: 21/10/10
CLIENT: Persimmon Homes
ENUMERATOR: david.groves [37-31]
JOB NUMBER: A067392
STATUS: On-going
DESCRIPTION:
.MAJOR/MINOR JUNCTION CAPACITY AND DELAY
***************************************
INPUT DATA
----------
MAJOR ROAD (ARM C) --------------------- MAJOR ROAD (ARM A) I
I
I
I
I
I
MINOR ROAD (ARM B)
ARM A IS Market Street
ARM B IS Hall Street
ARM C IS Market Street
STREAM LABELLING CONVENTION
---------------------------
STREAM A-B CONTAINS TRAFFIC GOING FROM ARM A TO ARM B
STREAM B-AC CONTAINS TRAFFIC GOING FROM ARM B TO ARM A AND TO ARM C
ETC.
.GEOMETRIC DATA
--------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
I DATA ITEM I MINOR ROAD B I ----------------------------------------------------------------
I TOTAL MAJOR ROAD CARRIAGEWAY WIDTH I ( W ) 8.50 M. I
I CENTRAL RESERVE WIDTH I (WCR ) 0.00 M. I
I I I I MAJOR ROAD RIGHT TURN - WIDTH I (WC-B) 2.20 M. I
I - VISIBILITY I (VC-B) 120.0 M. I
I - BLOCKS TRAFFIC I NO I
I I I
I MINOR ROAD - VISIBILITY TO LEFT I (VB-C) 31.0 M. I
I - VISIBILITY TO RIGHT I (VB-A) 48.0 M. I
I - LANE 1 WIDTH I (WB-C) 3.50 M. I
I - LANE 2 WIDTH I (WB-A) 0.00 M. I ----------------------------------------------------------------
.SLOPES AND INTERCEPT --------------------
(NB:Streams may be combined, in which case capacity
will be adjusted )
---------------------------------------------------------
I Intercept For Slope For Opposing Slope For Opposing I
I Stream B-C Stream A-C Stream A-B I
--------------------------------------------------------- I 686.90 0.24 0.09 I
---------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I Intercept For Slope For Opposing Slope For Opposing Slope For Opposing Slope For OpposingI
I Stream B-A Stream A-C Stream A-B Stream C-A Stream C-B I
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I 536.83 0.22 0.09 0.14 0.31 I
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------
I Intercept For Slope For Opposing Slope For Opposing I I Stream C-B Stream A-C Stream A-B I
---------------------------------------------------------
I 643.46 0.22 0.22 I ---------------------------------------------------------
NB These values do not allow for any site specific corrections
.
.TRAFFIC DEMAND DATA
-------------------
.-----------------------
I ARM I FLOW SCALE(%) I
-----------------------
I A I 100 I I B I 100 I
I C I 100 I
-----------------------
Demand set: Market Street Hall Street 2007 AM surveyed
TIME PERIOD BEGINS 16.45 AND ENDS 18.15
LENGTH OF TIME PERIOD - 90 MINUTES.
LENGTH OF TIME SEGMENT - 15 MINUTES.
DEMAND FLOW PROFILES ARE SYNTHESISED FROM TURNING COUNT DATA
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
I I NUMBER OF MINUTES FROM START WHEN I RATE OF FLOW (VEH/MIN) I
I ARM I FLOW STARTS I TOP OF PEAK I FLOW STOPS I BEFORE I AT TOP I AFTER I
I I TO RISE I IS REACHED I FALLING I PEAK I OF PEAK I PEAK I -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
I ARM A I 15.00 I 45.00 I 75.00 I 13.32 I 19.99 I 13.32 I
I ARM B I 15.00 I 45.00 I 75.00 I 2.34 I 3.51 I 2.34 I
I ARM C I 15.00 I 45.00 I 75.00 I 6.99 I 10.48 I 6.99 I -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
-----------------------------------------------------------
I I TURNING PROPORTIONS I
I I TURNING COUNTS (VEH/HR) I
I I (PERCENTAGE OF H.V.S) I
I -------------------------------------- I TIME I FROM/TO I ARM A I ARM B I ARM C I
-----------------------------------------------------------
I 16.45 - 18.15 I I I I I
I I ARM A I 0.000 I 0.253 I 0.747 I I I I 0.0 I 270.0 I 796.0 I
I I I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I
I I I I I I
I I ARM B I 0.615 I 0.000 I 0.385 I I I I 115.0 I 0.0 I 72.0 I
I I I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I
I I I I I I
I I ARM C I 0.848 I 0.152 I 0.000 I
I I I 474.0 I 85.0 I 0.0 I
I I I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I ( 0.0)I
I I I I I I -----------------------------------------------------------
TURNING PROPORTIONS ARE CALCULATED FROM TURNING COUNT DATA
THE PERCENTAGE OF HEAVY VEHICLES VARIES OVER TURNING MOVEMENTS
. QUEUE AND DELAY INFORMATION FOR EACH 15 MIN TIME SEGMENT
-------------------------------------------------------- FOR COMBINED DEMAND SETS
AND FOR TIME PERIOD 1
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDESTRIAN START END DELAY GEOMETRIC DELAY AVERAGE DELAY I I (VEH/MIN) (VEH/MIN) CAPACITY FLOW QUEUE QUEUE (VEH.MIN/ (VEH.MIN/ PER ARRIVING I
I (RFC) (PEDS/MIN) (VEHS) (VEHS) TIME SEGMENT) TIME SEGMENT) VEHICLE (MIN) I
I 16.45-17.00 I
I B-AC 2.35 6.24 0.376 0.00 0.59 8.2 0.25 I
I C-A 5.95 I
I C-B 1.07 7.75 0.138 0.00 0.16 2.3 0.15 I
I A-B 3.39 I
I A-C 9.99 I I I
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDESTRIAN START END DELAY GEOMETRIC DELAY AVERAGE DELAY I
I (VEH/MIN) (VEH/MIN) CAPACITY FLOW QUEUE QUEUE (VEH.MIN/ (VEH.MIN/ PER ARRIVING I
I (RFC) (PEDS/MIN) (VEHS) (VEHS) TIME SEGMENT) TIME SEGMENT) VEHICLE (MIN) I I 17.00-17.15 I
I B-AC 2.80 5.52 0.507 0.59 0.98 13.7 0.36 I
I C-A 7.10 I
I C-B 1.27 7.18 0.177 0.16 0.21 3.1 0.17 I
I A-B 4.05 I
I A-C 11.93 I
I I
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDESTRIAN START END DELAY GEOMETRIC DELAY AVERAGE DELAY I
I (VEH/MIN) (VEH/MIN) CAPACITY FLOW QUEUE QUEUE (VEH.MIN/ (VEH.MIN/ PER ARRIVING I
I (RFC) (PEDS/MIN) (VEHS) (VEHS) TIME SEGMENT) TIME SEGMENT) VEHICLE (MIN) I
I 17.15-17.30 I
I B-AC 3.43 4.50 0.762 0.98 2.64 33.0 0.78 I I C-A 8.70 I
I C-B 1.56 6.38 0.245 0.21 0.32 4.6 0.21 I
I A-B 4.95 I
I A-C 14.61 I I I
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDESTRIAN START END DELAY GEOMETRIC DELAY AVERAGE DELAY I
I (VEH/MIN) (VEH/MIN) CAPACITY FLOW QUEUE QUEUE (VEH.MIN/ (VEH.MIN/ PER ARRIVING I
I (RFC) (PEDS/MIN) (VEHS) (VEHS) TIME SEGMENT) TIME SEGMENT) VEHICLE (MIN) I
I 17.30-17.45 I
I B-AC 3.43 4.50 0.763 2.64 2.87 41.7 0.89 I
I C-A 8.70 I
I C-B 1.56 6.38 0.245 0.32 0.32 4.8 0.21 I I A-B 4.95 I
I A-C 14.61 I
I I
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDESTRIAN START END DELAY GEOMETRIC DELAY AVERAGE DELAY I
I (VEH/MIN) (VEH/MIN) CAPACITY FLOW QUEUE QUEUE (VEH.MIN/ (VEH.MIN/ PER ARRIVING I I (RFC) (PEDS/MIN) (VEHS) (VEHS) TIME SEGMENT) TIME SEGMENT) VEHICLE (MIN) I
I 17.45-18.00 I
I B-AC 2.80 5.52 0.507 2.87 1.08 18.5 0.40 I
I C-A 7.10 I I C-B 1.27 7.18 0.177 0.32 0.22 3.4 0.17 I
I A-B 4.05 I
I A-C 11.93 I
I I
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I TIME DEMAND CAPACITY DEMAND/ PEDESTRIAN START END DELAY GEOMETRIC DELAY AVERAGE DELAY I
I (VEH/MIN) (VEH/MIN) CAPACITY FLOW QUEUE QUEUE (VEH.MIN/ (VEH.MIN/ PER ARRIVING I
I (RFC) (PEDS/MIN) (VEHS) (VEHS) TIME SEGMENT) TIME SEGMENT) VEHICLE (MIN) I
I 18.00-18.15 I I B-AC 2.35 6.24 0.376 1.08 0.62 9.9 0.26 I
I C-A 5.95 I
I C-B 1.07 7.75 0.138 0.22 0.16 2.5 0.15 I
I A-B 3.39 I I A-C 9.99 I
I I
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
QUEUE FOR STREAM B-AC
-------------------------
TIME SEGMENT NO. OF
ENDING VEHICLES IN QUEUE
17.00 0.6 *
17.15 1.0 *
17.30 2.6 *** 17.45 2.9 ***
18.00 1.1 *
18.15 0.6 *
. QUEUE FOR STREAM C-B
-------------------------
TIME SEGMENT NO. OF
ENDING VEHICLES
IN QUEUE
17.00 0.2
17.15 0.2 17.30 0.3
17.45 0.3
18.00 0.2
18.15 0.2 .
QUEUEING DELAY INFORMATION OVER WHOLE PERIOD
--------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I STREAM I TOTAL DEMAND I * QUEUEING * I * INCLUSIVE QUEUEING * I
I I I * DELAY * I * DELAY * I
I I----------------------------------------------------------------I I I (VEH) (VEH/H) I (MIN) (MIN/VEH) I (MIN) (MIN/VEH) I
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I B-AC I 257.4 I 171.6 I 125.0 I 0.49 I 125.0 I 0.49 I
I C-A I 652.4 I 435.0 I I I I I
I C-B I 117.0 I 78.0 I 20.6 I 0.18 I 20.6 I 0.18 I
I A-B I 371.6 I 247.8 I I I I I
I A-C I 1095.6 I 730.4 I I I I I
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- I ALL I 2494.1 I 1662.7 I 145.6 I 0.06 I 145.6 I 0.06 I
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
* DELAY IS THAT OCCURRING ONLY WITHIN THE TIME PERIOD .
* INCLUSIVE DELAY INCLUDES DELAY SUFFERED BY VEHICLES WHICH ARE STILL QUEUEING AFTER THE END OF THE TIME PERIOD.
* THESE WILL ONLY BE SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT IF THERE IS A LARGE QUEUE REMAINING AT THE END OF THE TIME PERIOD.
END OF JOB
============================================= end of file ===============================================