Www.shipandoffshore.net Issue1 2011http Uploadpdf Issue1 2011

8
Bnkerng, nfrasrcre, sorage, an rocessng of LNG Emissions rEduction t ply wh e eve al egla, pvee  hp’ e ae gely eqe. LnG a a hp’ el wll ee nox lealy belw te iii level, sox a palae ae ab ze a co 2 by 20 30% wh ay eae b gae. ma hallege he age LnG, hweve , le he ae age a peg he lqefe ga a well a he bke ae, pee a eqpe.  ge Hapehe Using LNG as uel has been a common technology or decades on LNG carriers.  The saety record or loading/unloading o such vessels as well as or the operation o propulsion systems based on burning boil-o gas is very good. During the last 10 years, operational experience has been gained in Norway where small ships have been equipped with LNG propulsion, e. g. erries and oshore supply vessels.  The diculty when providing LNG as uel to a wider scale o ships and shipping ar- eas is the bunker inrastructure to make LNG available wherever ship’s operators may need it. It is thereore crucial or the introduction o LNG as a uel to have an inrastructure in place that secures sae, ast and reliable accessibility to LNG or the operators - a major task or those involved in small scale LNG. cae ye In respect to storage, one basic disadvan- tage o LNG is its low density: LNG takes up roughly twice the volume o uel oil or the same energy content. There are several types o containment systems or LNG avail- able but some o them are not easible or the given conditions on ships using LNG as uel. The current regulatory approach is based on sel supporting tanks as dened in the IMO IGC code: Type A (designed as ship structures) and type B (prismatic or spheri- cal) tanks are generally easible or uel gas tanks but their requirement or pressure maintenance and secondary barrier raise problems which have not yet been solved in a technically and commercially sound  way . This may be a utur e solution or ships carrying large amounts o LNG as uel. Hence IMO type C tanks (pressure ves- sels) turn out to be the preerred solution or current designs. Firstly, the tanks are  very sae and reliable, secondly, their high design pressures allow high loading rates and pressure increase due to boil-o and nally, they are easy to abricate and install.  The major disadvantage o this type o tank is the space consumption due to restriction to cylindrical, conical and bilobe shape. In addition to the unavorable volume/energy eciency, these design restrictions lead to a actor o 3 to 4 times required volume to carry the same amount o energy in com- parison to oil based tankers. LNG tanks have to be insulated or two rea- sons: One is to reduce boil-o vapour gen- eration by heat ingress and the other is to protect adjacent ship structures rom very cold temperatures. For ships with more or less continuous consumption o LNG and only short periods o low or no demand, the conventional oam insulation will be the most economical type o insulation. LNG consumption o the engines will keep tank pressure low. For ships with longer pe- riods o low consumption, or example op- erational patterns based on LNG use only in ECA and conventional uel outside ECAs, it might be essential to improve tank insula- tion in order to reduce pressure rise in tanks. In regards to small tanks this can be done by using vacuum insulation as seen in Norway.  These vacuum insulated tanks are limited to cylindrical shape and do not allow or in-tank inspections or mounting o in-tank equipment as they usually have no man- hole. For tanks clearly exceeding 500 cbm or requiring bilobe or conical shape, the use o special insulation panels is proposed to im- prove insulation perormance. Pe ye Depending on the design parameters such as storage size, number o tanks, engine consumption and layout, required bun- kering rate and arrangement o the system components, tailor-made solutions or LNG uel gas systems are available. One general rule is that or larger storage vol- umes the cost impact o high tank operat- ing pressures becomes signicant; these systems should be preerably equipped  with mechanical pressure rising (pumps, Fge 1: Ppal vew imo ype c blbe a yle ak Image: TGE Fge 2: oe pble ak lay a pje y a ae eee Image: TGE, GL, MAN, Netun SK 12 Si & Offsoe | 2011 |N 1 ShipBuiLdiNG & EquipmENt | GrEEN ShIp TEchNOLOGy

Transcript of Www.shipandoffshore.net Issue1 2011http Uploadpdf Issue1 2011

Page 1: Www.shipandoffshore.net Issue1 2011http Uploadpdf Issue1 2011

8/2/2019 Www.shipandoffshore.net Issue1 2011httpwww.shipandoffshore.netfileadminuser Uploadpdfwww.shipandoffshore.n…

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/wwwshipandoffshorenet-issue1-2011httpwwwshipandoffshorenetfileadminuser 1/7

Bnkerng, nfrasrcre,

sorage, an rocessng of LNGEmissions rEduction t ply wh e eveal egla, pvee  hp’ e ae gely eqe. LnG a a hp’ el wll ee nox lealy belwte iii level, sox a palae ae ab ze a co

2by 20 30% wh ay

eae b gae. ma hallege he age LnG, hweve, le he aeage a peg he lqefe ga a well a he bke ae,pee a eqpe.

 Jüge Hapehe

Using LNG as uel has been a commontechnology or decades on LNG carriers.

  The saety record or loading/unloading o such vessels as well as or the operationo propulsion systems based on burning boil-o gas is very good. During the last 10 years, operational experience has beengained in Norway where small ships havebeen equipped with LNG propulsion, e. g.erries and oshore supply vessels.

 The diculty when providing LNG as uelto a wider scale o ships and shipping ar-eas is the bunker inrastructure to makeLNG available wherever ship’s operatorsmay need it. It is thereore crucial or theintroduction o LNG as a uel to have aninrastructure in place that secures sae, ast and reliable accessibility to LNG or theoperators - a major task or those involvedin small scale LNG.

cae yeIn respect to storage, one basic disadvan-tage o LNG is its low density: LNG takesup roughly twice the volume o uel oil or the same energy content. There are severaltypes o containment systems or LNG avail-

able but some o them are not easible or the given conditions on ships using LNGas uel. The current regulatory approach isbased on sel supporting tanks as dened inthe IMO IGC code: Type A (designed as shipstructures) and type B (prismatic or spheri-cal) tanks are generally easible or uel gastanks but their requirement or pressuremaintenance and secondary barrier raiseproblems which have not yet been solvedin a technically and commercially sound

 way. This may be a uture solution or shipscarrying large amounts o LNG as uel.Hence IMO type C tanks (pressure ves-

sels) turn out to be the preerred solutionor current designs. Firstly, the tanks are very sae and reliable, secondly, their highdesign pressures allow high loading ratesand pressure increase due to boil-o andnally, they are easy to abricate and install.

 The major disadvantage o this type o tank is the space consumption due to restrictionto cylindrical, conical and bilobe shape. Inaddition to the unavorable volume/energy eciency, these design restrictions lead toa actor o 3 to 4 times required volume tocarry the same amount o energy in com-parison to oil based tankers.LNG tanks have to be insulated or two rea-sons: One is to reduce boil-o vapour gen-eration by heat ingress and the other is toprotect adjacent ship structures rom very cold temperatures. For ships with more or less continuous consumption o LNG andonly short periods o low or no demand,the conventional oam insulation will bethe most economical type o insulation.LNG consumption o the engines will keeptank pressure low. For ships with longer pe-riods o low consumption, or example op-erational patterns based on LNG use only inECA and conventional uel outside ECAs, it might be essential to improve tank insula-tion in order to reduce pressure rise in tanks.In regards to small tanks this can be done by using vacuum insulation as seen in Norway.

  These vacuum insulated tanks are limited

to cylindrical shape and do not allow or in-tank inspections or mounting o in-tank equipment as they usually have no man-hole. For tanks clearly exceeding 500 cbm or requiring bilobe or conical shape, the use o special insulation panels is proposed to im-prove insulation perormance.

Pe yeDepending on the design parameters suchas storage size, number o tanks, engineconsumption and layout, required bun-kering rate and arrangement o the systemcomponents, tailor-made solutions or 

LNG uel gas systems are available. Onegeneral rule is that or larger storage vol-umes the cost impact o high tank operat-ing pressures becomes signicant; thesesystems should be preerably equipped

  with mechanical pressure rising (pumps,

Fge 1: Ppal vew imo ype cblbe a yle ak Image: TGE

Fge 2: oe pble ak lay apje y a ae eee

Image: TGE, GL, MAN, Netun SK

12 Si & Offsoe | 2011 | N 1

ShipBuiLdiNG & EquipmENt | GrEEN ShIp TEchNOLOGy

Page 2: Www.shipandoffshore.net Issue1 2011http Uploadpdf Issue1 2011

8/2/2019 Www.shipandoffshore.net Issue1 2011httpwww.shipandoffshore.netfileadminuser Uploadpdfwww.shipandoffshore.n…

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/wwwshipandoffshorenet-issue1-2011httpwwwshipandoffshorenetfileadminuser 2/7

Fge 4: shea aga el ga ye wh pe Image: TGE

Figure 3: schematic diagram of fuel ga ytem with vacuum tank and cold box Image: TGE

Fge 5: shea aga hgh pee el ga ye w-ke egeImage: TGE

compressors) instead o keeping the en-tire tank on supply pressure level. Smaller tanks can be pressurized to the requiredgas supply pressure. The cost impact o thehigher tank design pressure is airly small

and there is a benet o easy operation andreduced numbers o rotating equipment.

 When using vacuum insulated tanks, a bot-tom outlet will eed a tank vaporizer just orced by density (see gure 3). Typically the operation pressure would be around7 bar g. By means o the tank pressure theLNG is pushed towards the LNG vaporizer.Usually all tank connections and the tank 

 vaporizer are enclosed in a “cold box” asa secondary barrier. A uel gas heater willbe employed in order to provide vapour at the right temperature via uel gas master 

 valve to gas valve unit (GVU). The GVU re-

duces pressure to the required value o theengines and is usually part o the enginemanuacturer’s supply.One option or this simple system is to usea small in-tank pump to eed the tank va-porizer, thus avoiding the bottom outlet.However, this is only possible or singleshell type C tanks with oam insulation.

  As mentioned above, when using larger tank volumes high design pressure willincrease the cost signicantly. Including ascrew compressor in order to pressurize theuel gas is one option to reduce design pres-sure rom typically 10 barg to 4 barg, seegure 4. Vaporization will then take placeat a lower pressure level, a small amount o pressurized vapour is returned to the tank to push the liquid to the vaporizer. Thecompressor system also allows or other operations like uel gas supply rom tank 

  vapour phase, warming-up o the piping system and tanks with hot gas and increas-ing loading rate without vapour return us-ing a BOG absorber.Finally, two stroke engines require another modication o the system due to high in-jection pressure o 300 bar g, see gure 5.

On LNG carriers this can be achieved by us-ing BOG compressors but or other ships,this will only be a viable solution in someparticular cases due to high CAPEX, pow-er requirements, size and weight o suchequipment. High pressure pumps and highpressure vaporizer and heater are the pre-erred alternative in order to achieve therequired pressure level. Tanks will usually be equipped with small intank pumps or pressure built-up vaporizers to eed the highpressure system.

saey ye

Saety always results rom the best combi-nation o technical and procedural meas-ures. Thereore crew training is one basic element o saety on the technical side.

  There are several saety systems in placethat will allow controlling any situa-

Si & Offsoe | 2011 | N 1 13

Page 3: Www.shipandoffshore.net Issue1 2011http Uploadpdf Issue1 2011

8/2/2019 Www.shipandoffshore.net Issue1 2011httpwww.shipandoffshore.netfileadminuser Uploadpdfwww.shipandoffshore.n…

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/wwwshipandoffshorenet-issue1-2011httpwwwshipandoffshorenetfileadminuser 3/7

tion that might occur during system opera-tion. IMO interim guideline MSC 285(86)as a preliminary version o IGF-Code andthe Rules or LNG uelled ships that havebeen published by all major classicationsocieties, have been derived rom chapter 16 o IGC-Code or using cargo as uel, try-ing to adapt the solutions to the dierent purpose in case o ships that are not gascarriers. Decade-long experience with LNGoperations indicates the main measures toollow to ensure sae handling o LNG.One o these saety measures is a gas de-tection system which can detect even smallamounts o gas escaping rom the closedsystem. The relevant parts o the uel gasplant will be shut down as soon as gas isdetected. Areas where leakages may occur are equipped with ex-proo equipment,so even i the atmosphere contains an ex-plosive mixture o gas and Oxygen, there

  will be no spark to ignite it. Gas piping 

and LNG piping will be double walled or located inside a ventilated duct in order tohave a secondary barrier in place in case o any leakages. Spill detection and stainlesssteel drip trays are located wherever LNGmight escape and harm the ship structuresby cold brittleness. Piping sections not inuse are inerted with Nitrogen, e. g. bunker-ing line ater bunkering is nished.

Bkeg aeFirst steps towards small scale LNG ship-ping as an element o uel gas supply inra-structure were made by the very small LNGcarriers Pioneer Knutsen in Norway andShinju Maru in Japan as well as by the Coral Methane, the rst combined LNG/Ethylene-Carrier with dual uel LNG/HFO propul-sion. This ship – below shown in gure 6during rst ever loading o a small carrier at a large LNG import terminal – is owned by 

 Anthony Veder and was designed by TGE.

Dual uel propulsion is based on diesel-electric systems with two diesel and twogas generators. To date, several shipmentsrom Zeebrugge or Huelva to Norway havebeen made. At one point, the ship was

moored some weeks alongside in Norway unloading LNG to trucks, basically acting as a foating storage acility. Ship and gashandling system have proven to be able toperorm all required operations.Furthermore, designs or LNG eeder vesselsand LNG bunker ships are on the drawing board as shown below. Size and capacity o these eeder vessels strongly depend ontravel distances, requirements or multi-cargo capability, expected trade volumesand characteristics o the receiving termi-nals. In any case, the acilities to call at theexisting large scale LNG terminals as well

as ship to ship transer with large carriersseem to be essential at the current stage o development in order to source LNG romthe large scale global supply chain.Figure 9 shows Pioneer Knudsen and Coral Methane during LNG transer. In actualact, this is not a bunkering situation but the rst cooling o  Coral Methane but it gives a good impression o how bunkering could look like in the near uture. Based onthe upcoming requirements o high bun-kering rates and growing tank volumes per ship, bunkering will not be possible any more with today’s “truck and hose” solu-tions. Manual handling o large diameter connections including dry break couplings

 will be replaced by mechanical or hydraulic solutions that are currently under develop-ment. Further, services like tank inerting,tank warming-up, tank unloading beoredocking, gassing-up and cooling downcould be part o a bunker barge’s tasks.Local bunker supply also requires dedicat-ed storage capacities close to the bunker ar-eas. This can be done by onshore storagesin pressure vessels or fat-bottom tanks but 

Fge 6: Coral Methane a Zeebgge eal pitue: Anton Vede

Fge 7: deg exaple a 30,000 b LnG eee veel pitue: TGE

14 Si & Offsoe | 2011 | N 1

ShipBuiLdiNG & EquipmENt | GrEEN ShIp TEchNOLOGy

Page 4: Www.shipandoffshore.net Issue1 2011http Uploadpdf Issue1 2011

8/2/2019 Www.shipandoffshore.net Issue1 2011httpwww.shipandoffshore.netfileadminuser Uploadpdfwww.shipandoffshore.n…

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/wwwshipandoffshorenet-issue1-2011httpwwwshipandoffshorenetfileadminuser 4/7

also by foating storages. One alternativesolution with barges that would be carriedlike very large containers by a barge carrier 

is under evaluation, see gure 10.Summing up the mentioned requirementson the bunkering inrastructure, we can seea demand or signicant investment that may possibly not be supported by bun-kering activities only. Sharing the bunker supply chain with local consumers such asindustries or power plants would create anappealing portolio or investments intothis new inrastructure.

cl Technical solutions or the sae operation o LNG uel gas rom the source (large termi-nal) down to the consumer (main engine o the LNG-uelled ships) are currently avail-

able. Emission control and rather low LNGprices should be the main drivers to buildthe required inrastructure. Small scale LNG

shipping has already begun and with therelevant dates or emission legislation ap-proaching, the pressure rises or everybody to nd a solution to meet the upcoming challenges. LNG as a ship’s uel is only onepossible solution but it should play a ma-jor role due to the advantages compared toother solutions. TGE is condent that, over the course o the next years, an increasing number o ships will be equipped and sail-ing with LNG propulsion.

Fge 8: deg exaple a 2,000 b LnG bke veel pitue: TGE

the ah: Jüge Hapehe,sale maage, tGE mae GaEgeeg GbH, B, Geay

Fge 9: Pioneer Knudsen a Coral Methane  pitue: Gasno/Anton Vede

Fge 10: LnG bage ae pitue: TGE

Maritime habitats demand a great

deal o love. The preservation o

clean water or sensitive sea dwellersis an obligation.

With Westalia Separator® 

seaprotectsolutions we are con-

tinuing our joint eorts to protect

the sensitive marine ecosystem

and the value o your investment.

One example o the harmonious

balance between environmental

and economic requirements is the

Westalia Separator® CombiMaster®,

a centriugal separation system

designed or combined bilgewater

and sludge treatment. Westalia

Separator® SludgeMaster® and

Westalia Separator® BilgeMaster® 

are also available as stand-alone

systems i required.

Owners and captains o more than

500 ships rely on leading centriugal

separation technologies rom

GEA Westalia Separator Group or

the treatment o bilgewater and

sludge.

Complete, ready-to-connectsystems are available as compact

units or new installation or as

retroft.

Your direct route to service:

www.westalia-separator.com / service

Thank you IMO!

     M     A  -     4  -     1     0  -     0     1     1

GEA Mechanical Equipment

GEA Westalia Separator Group

Werner-Habig-Straße 1 · 59302 Oelde (Germany)

Phone +49 2522 77-0 · Fax +49 2522 77-1778

www.westfalia-separator.com

Liquids to Value

Page 5: Www.shipandoffshore.net Issue1 2011http Uploadpdf Issue1 2011

8/2/2019 Www.shipandoffshore.net Issue1 2011httpwww.shipandoffshore.netfileadminuser Uploadpdfwww.shipandoffshore.n…

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/wwwshipandoffshorenet-issue1-2011httpwwwshipandoffshorenetfileadminuser 5/7

 

DVV Media Group GmbHSales DepartmentP.O. BOX 10 16 0920010 HamburgGERMANY

 Yes, I w ou ld l i ke t o t es t 3 i ssues Sh ip& Of f shore

Ship&Offshore is the English-language international trade magazine which provides you six

times a year with global insights into trends and developments of the maritime industry.

Ship&Offshore offers the reader specialist information from all sectors of the maritime

industry, focusing on the shipbuilding industry, ship technology and the growth market,

offshore technology.

---> If you prefer to fill in your data online, please click here. <---

Please send th e t r i a l issues of Ship & Offshore t o :

by eMai l or by pos t  

Company

Company activity

Department

First name/Name

Telephone / Fax

eMai l

Street / P.O. BOX

Postal code, Town, Country

Date / Signature SPI_ON_1102 

serv ice@shipandof fshore .net w w w . sh i p a n d o f f sh o r e .n e t

Page 6: Www.shipandoffshore.net Issue1 2011http Uploadpdf Issue1 2011

8/2/2019 Www.shipandoffshore.net Issue1 2011httpwww.shipandoffshore.netfileadminuser Uploadpdfwww.shipandoffshore.n…

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/wwwshipandoffshorenet-issue1-2011httpwwwshipandoffshorenetfileadminuser 6/7

Shipbiling &Eqipment

16

Shipbiling &Eqipment

Arctic technology 

Shipbiling &Eqipment

Geen ship technolog

10 Developments or asustainable shipping industry 

12 Bunkering, inrastructure,storage, and processing o LNG

16 Innovative new cargo ship addsthrust with rotor sails

19 Green supertanker concept 

20 Corrosion studies on ballast  water 

21 Three-step ballast water treatment system

23 Hercules research programmeprolonged

An advertising supplement of Haus der Technik, Copenhagen, isenclosed to a part of the copies of this Ship&Offshore issue

Poplsion & manoeving

technolog24 Improving propulsion efciency 

25 Enhancements to 1163 series

Cise & feies

28 Oceangoing high-endentertainment platorm

30 Luxury cruise erry or the Mediterranean

Safet & secit

31 Saety systems or cruise shipping 

32 New EPIRB and lie rat releasesystem

33 Rescue ships or Chinese authorities

34 Independent entity topromote saety 

34 Call or consensus

35 Inst nes

In Focs

The new Website! 

www.shipandoffshore.net

incl.

online

archive!

 4 Ship & Oshor | 2011 | No 1

Page 7: Www.shipandoffshore.net Issue1 2011http Uploadpdf Issue1 2011

8/2/2019 Www.shipandoffshore.net Issue1 2011httpwww.shipandoffshore.netfileadminuser Uploadpdfwww.shipandoffshore.n…

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/wwwshipandoffshorenet-issue1-2011httpwwwshipandoffshorenetfileadminuser 7/7

5738

Navigation &

commnication57 Managed-services solution

58 ‘Plug and Play’

58 Worldwide network 

58 VHF locator beacon technology 

59 Satellite data accelerator andcontrol router 

60 Inst nes

Offshoe &Maine Technolog

Offshoe &Maine Technolog

COMMENT ........................... 3NEwS & FACTS ................... 6BuyEr‘S GuIdE ................ 47IMPrINT ............................. 63

  ShipOpeation

reglas

reneable eneg

42 Vessel concept to reduce costsand carbon emissions

43 Class rules or wind arm service vessels

44 Inst nes

Offshoe &

actic technolog38 Winterisation o Sevan 1000

39 Seismic vessels or arctic waters

40 Joint venture or arctic shipbuilding 

40 Polar rules and ice guidance

Oil & gas

41 Network o oil spill recovery  vessels

 ABB Turbocharging.

Don’t take chances.

Original ABB spare parts are your assurance of 

the highest quality and precision. For further

information please contact your nearest ABB

 Turbocharging service station.

www.abb.com/turbocharging

 

Please visit our new website

.shipanoffshoe.net

Ship & Oshor | 2011 | No 1 5

CONTENT | JaNuaRy/febRuaRy 2011