Www.rti.org 6/19/2015 The Design of a Benefit-Cost Architecture for Homeland Security Policy...
-
date post
20-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Www.rti.org 6/19/2015 The Design of a Benefit-Cost Architecture for Homeland Security Policy...
www.rti.org
04/18/23
The Design of a Benefit-Cost Architecture for
Homeland Security Policy Analysis
V. Kerry Smith (Arizona State University, RFF, NBER)
Carol Mansfield (RTI International)
Prepared for
Estimating the Benefits of Homeland Security Policies
September 23 & 24, 2010
Funded by CREATE@USC
1
www.rti.org
04/18/23
Analysis is Especially Important in Challenging Economic Times
“Regulations must be designed in a way that promotes, and does not undermine, the continuing recovery. A transparent accounting of consequences – of costs and benefits – is indispensable. If we look before we leap, with a commitment to openness, we are going to be finding unprecedented opportunities for improving and even extending people’s lives.” (pp23-24)
Sunstein, Cass R., 2010. “Humanizing cost benefit analysis” Remarks prepared for the Administrative Law Review Conference, American University, Washington College of Law, Washington, D.C.
www.rti.org
04/18/23
Objectives Measuring benefits for benefit-cost analysis
Steps to define benefits
Use Secure Flight as example
Tradeoffs from revealed and stated preference work VSL and Opportunity Cost Choice Experiments
Describing Architecture for Policy Analysis and relation to defining benefits
Need to consider who are the affected economic agents
www.rti.org
04/18/23
Steps to Define and Measure Benefits Rule or policy has list of actions or tasks
Link tasks to expected outcomes for individuals
Expected outcomes to objects of choice
Quantitative or qualitative measures for objects of choice
Baseline, change if rule implemented, define affected groups
Evaluate trade-offs individuals would make to get changes (value) and the extent of the market
4
www.rti.org
04/18/23
www.rti.org
04/18/23
Example: Secure Flight RIA
General Description
Transfer, from aircraft operators to federal agencies, the tasks associated with conducting pre-flight comparisons of airline passenger information with the Federal Government’s watch lists
Allows for access to gate area by some non-traveling individuals (for example, escorting a minor or passenger with disabilities)
6
www.rti.org
04/18/23
Actions Listed in Secure Flight (examples)
TSA will assume the domestic watch list matching function from aircraft operators
TSA will assume from the U.S. Customs and Border Protection the responsibility for comparing passenger information to government watch lists for certain domestic and foreign aircraft operators
Airlines transmit information on passengers and non-travelers to TSA
TSA can ask airlines to require additional identification from passenger
7
www.rti.org
04/18/23
Actions to Expected Outcomes (from RIA)
• Improved security in airports and on airlines• Greater access for non-traveling individuals• Reduced false positives or misidentification of
travelers as potential security threats• Increased watch list security • Boarding pass authentication
www.rti.org
04/18/23
Expected Outcomes to Objects of Choice
Objects of choice are the set of things over which people have preferences
From microeconomic theory to provide a general description for the relationship between consumers’ choices and the observed patterns of demand
People can have preferences for anything
less tangible goods like “peace of mind when risks are reduced”
9
www.rti.org
04/18/23
Objects of Choice, con’t
For many (most?) DHS rules, the objects of choice will not be market goods
Objects of choice will be risk reductions, opportunity cost of time, level of privacy, amount of hassle
These objects of choice can be complements with decisions we observe the individual making like purchasing tickets
10
www.rti.org
04/18/23
Objects of Choice for Secure Flight, Example
Household production function one way to think about less tangible objects of choice:
U(Leisure time activities)
Leisure travel = f(equipment, transportation, lodging, activities, time)
Transportation = f(cost of tickets, time, fear of terrorist attack on an airplane).
Objects of choice for Secure Flight might be “fear of a terrorist attack” and “time spent waiting in security”.
11
www.rti.org
04/18/23
Example, con’t
Risk of terrorist attack on airplanes and tickets are complements
Demand for airline tickets will increase as risk decreases, will provide some information about preferences for risk
12
www.rti.org
04/18/23
Total Focus (1)
Incremental Focus(2)
(3)
(save resources if q desirable)
),,(),,( qpmVqqpWTPmV
)( choiceofobjectbaselineq
changeq
tradeoffWTP
0 dqVdmV qm
m
q
V
V
dq
dm
www.rti.org
04/18/23
Heterogeneity in WTP and in demand for complement
WTP for change in object of choice affected by
How the rule is implemented (mechanism for achieving risk reduction)
Baseline level
Size of change
Demand for complement (airline tickets) will vary across individuals
Differences across individuals in elasticity of demand (business travelers vs. leisure travelers)
14
www.rti.org
04/18/23
VSL).,..,.,( 1 Jrrp
)().,..,,()()).,..,,(1( 11 WUrrpWUrrpEU AJDJ
0)()1()(
)]()()[/(
WUWU
WUWUp
dp
dWVSL
DA
DA
(4)
(5)
(6)
VSL is measured by considering from the number (N) of people willing to pay this amount so risk change and N imply fatalities reduce by one.
dp
dw
www.rti.org
04/18/23
Opportunity Cost of TimeMax: u(x, H, )
y= income
x= numeraire (price=unity)
H= leisure
= household work (pre-determined time)
T= total time (net work)
Subject to: y = x+ps [ - f (T-H)]
Issues:
• Do we define y in terms of earnings W.TW so T=Tt-Tw
• If the answer is no then what margin do we use to get value of time
M
M
M
'fptimeofvalueshadowU
Us
x
H
www.rti.org
04/18/23
Extent of the Market
Extent of the market: defining who is affected by the rule
Need to assign objects of choice to each group
Travelers: reduced risk of attack, reduced risk of being mistakenly identified as on the watch list
Parents of traveling children: greater security for children traveling alone, reduced risk of attack
17
www.rti.org
04/18/23
Example from Biometric Exit RIA (Table 5-2 in RIA)
Exit Objective Exit Benefit Measure
Biometrically verify alien identity
Increased National Security
Qualitative: reduction of terrorism costs due to border security, unquantified security benefits
Mechanism to identify visa overstays
Improved detection of visa overstays
Percentage of visa overstays detected,Cost savings from identifying visa over-stayer before reentry to US
18
www.rti.org
04/18/23
Defining and Measuring Benefits: Examples from our work
5 years ago we initiated a modest program of research to design and implement three stated preference surveys measuring the benefits of some security programs
The surveys were exploratory, not clear whether we could describe the “goods” and people could answer the questions
19
www.rti.org
04/18/23
Threat of Shoulder-Mounted Missile Attack on Airplanes
Plans
MANPADS (missile defense technology)
Training for pilots if plane hit
Patrol airport perimeter
Attributes varied: Waiting time in security, cost
Payment vehicles: Gasoline tax, income tax
Link for benefit transfer: opportunity cost of time, (risk of attack not specified)
20
www.rti.org
04/18/23
Food Safety Plans
More FDA inspectors
Home test kit for use before cooking
Medicine if get sick
Varied: risk of illness, severity of illness, cost, time to use test kit when cooking
Payment vehicle: income tax, cost of kit or medicine
Link for benefit transfer: risk and severity of illness, opportunity cost of time
21
www.rti.org
04/18/23
Dirty Bombs Plans
Build facilities to shelter in place
Monitors and cameras to detect radioactive material
Plan and practice evacuating the city
Varied map showing example of dirty bomb (40 maps), leave days used to practice evacuation
Payment vehicle: income tax
Link to benefit transfer: opportunity cost of time, geographic variation across metro areas
22
www.rti.org
04/18/23
Policy Analysis Architecture
A framework to link the regulations to the consequences for people, firms, and other institutions in ways that allow the benefits and costs of each change to be clearly articulated and assessed.
Must be general enough to accommodate a wide variety of rules
EPA uses risk management, their policy analysis centers around risk assessment
23
www.rti.org
04/18/23
Threat Point Source of Threat
Outset of Travel
During Travel
•Take Off
•Landing
Composite Perception of Security and “Cost” of Travel
Viability of Airline System
www.rti.org
04/18/23
Analysis Framework Organized Around Preparedness
May, Michael, Lynn Eden, Patrick Roberts, and Jacob N. Shapiro. 2006. An Analytic Approach to Preparedness for Homeland Security. Stanford CA: Center for International Security and Cooperation; Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies.
25
www.rti.org
04/18/23
26
Events:What are the consequences in terms of capabilities based planning?
Prevention and Protection:What capabilities are needed to prevent and protect?What performance measures are needed to assess these capabilities?
Response and Recovery:What capabilities are needed to respond and recover?What performance measures are needed to assess these capabilities?
Crosscutting elements of Preparedness:•Allocating finite resources under conditions of uncertainty•Prioritizing what to protect•Structuring incentives for complementary private action•Recognizing the endogeneity in the responses to some threats•Identifying ancillary benefits from policies not related to homeland security
www.rti.org
04/18/23
Potential Complementarities in Protection Activity that can also be exploited for analysis a
Terrorist attack
Natural disaster
Industrial disaster
1. Prevention to stop attacks
X
2. Prevention to deter attacks
X
3. Prevention to eliminate natural or industrial disasters
X X
4. Protection to reduce damage
X X X
5. Protection by physical separation
X X X
a Source: May et. al. [2006]
www.rti.org
04/18/23
Moving to Architecture for Analysis
What will be the Focus of Rules?
•Ex ante risk reduction
•Ex ante consequence reduction
•Ex post response
•Composite—need to consider different benefit concepts (certainty equivalent, option price, etc.)
www.rti.org
04/18/23
Importance of Feedback
Evaluation should include reviewing economic analysis for past rules
What did the analysis capture and what did it miss?
In the decision-making process, how was the analysis used? Which parts were most useful?
What methods provided most information?
29
www.rti.org
04/18/23
Conclusion The development of an organization’s analysis capacity
takes place within the context of the group’s goals
Benefit-cost analysis provides policy makers a systematic evaluation based on economic theory of what policies that restrict private activities or manage resources held in public trust are expected to accomplish
The structure, methods and outcomes evaluated will be shaped by the policy architecture that evolves in DHS
30