WUSM Blood Conservation Phlebotomy Reduction Techniques Project
description
Transcript of WUSM Blood Conservation Phlebotomy Reduction Techniques Project
![Page 1: WUSM Blood Conservation Phlebotomy Reduction Techniques Project](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051420/56815f5f550346895dce4383/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
WUSM Blood ConservationPhlebotomy Reduction Techniques Project
CRIT Collaborative Meeting6/25/2012Jennifer York, MDWashington University in St. Louis
![Page 2: WUSM Blood Conservation Phlebotomy Reduction Techniques Project](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051420/56815f5f550346895dce4383/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Hypothesis and Specific Aims• Aim 1: The primary aim is to pilot the effectiveness of pairing evidence-based
Phlebotomy Reduction Techniques (PRT) with evidence-based Implementation Strategies (IS). We hypothesize that the use of evidence-based IS to apply the PRT will synergistically facilitate effective implementation.
• Aim 2: The secondary aim is to capture data on clinical outcomes of volume overdrawn, hemoglobin drop, and transfusion rate. We hypothesize that blood wastage, iatrogenic anemia and red blood cell (RBC) transfusions will be reduced with effective implementation of PRT.
• Aim 3: The tertiary aim is to capture data on implementation outcomes of acceptability (perceived usefulness) and adoption (use of the system). We hypothesize that use of evidence-based IS will improve these implementation outcomes.
![Page 3: WUSM Blood Conservation Phlebotomy Reduction Techniques Project](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051420/56815f5f550346895dce4383/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Study Design
![Page 4: WUSM Blood Conservation Phlebotomy Reduction Techniques Project](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051420/56815f5f550346895dce4383/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Pre-Implementation Data
• Detailed characterization of blood draws on 112 PICU patients
• Overdraw = the volume of blood removed in excess of requirements for any given lab set
• 87% of samples were overdrawn• Mean overdraw 0.8 ± 1 ml• 3.3 ± 2.5 ml blood/kg ( 0.5 ± 0.2 ml blood/kg/day)
was removed
![Page 5: WUSM Blood Conservation Phlebotomy Reduction Techniques Project](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051420/56815f5f550346895dce4383/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Pre-Implementation Data
p<0.01 p<0.01
![Page 6: WUSM Blood Conservation Phlebotomy Reduction Techniques Project](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051420/56815f5f550346895dce4383/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Pre-Implementation Data
p<0.01p<0.01 for group 1 vs. group 2p<0.01 for group 2 vs. group 3p<0.01 for group 1 vs. group 3
1
2
3p<0.01 for all categories* p<0.01 for CVC vs. others
*
![Page 7: WUSM Blood Conservation Phlebotomy Reduction Techniques Project](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051420/56815f5f550346895dce4383/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Study Design
![Page 8: WUSM Blood Conservation Phlebotomy Reduction Techniques Project](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051420/56815f5f550346895dce4383/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Preparation Phase
• PICU Nursing Staff REDCap Survey• PICU Nursing Staff Focus Groups
• Goals:– To identify driving forces for current practice– To identify barriers to change– To raise awareness– Ground level engagement
![Page 9: WUSM Blood Conservation Phlebotomy Reduction Techniques Project](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051420/56815f5f550346895dce4383/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Study Design
![Page 10: WUSM Blood Conservation Phlebotomy Reduction Techniques Project](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051420/56815f5f550346895dce4383/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
PRT Implementation
• Phlebotomy Reduction Techniques– Bedside Minimal Volume Reference Guide
![Page 11: WUSM Blood Conservation Phlebotomy Reduction Techniques Project](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051420/56815f5f550346895dce4383/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Bedside Minimal Volume Reference Guide
![Page 12: WUSM Blood Conservation Phlebotomy Reduction Techniques Project](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051420/56815f5f550346895dce4383/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
PRT Implementation
• Phlebotomy Reduction Techniques– Bedside Minimal Volume Reference Guide– Exclusive microtube use with environmental
engineering– Venous safe-draw system
![Page 13: WUSM Blood Conservation Phlebotomy Reduction Techniques Project](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051420/56815f5f550346895dce4383/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Microtubes & Venous Safe-Draw
![Page 14: WUSM Blood Conservation Phlebotomy Reduction Techniques Project](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051420/56815f5f550346895dce4383/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
PRT Implementation
• Phlebotomy Reduction Techniques– Bedside Minimal Volume Reference Guide– Exclusive microtube use with environmental
engineering– Venous safe-draw system– Blood Culture volume policy change
![Page 15: WUSM Blood Conservation Phlebotomy Reduction Techniques Project](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051420/56815f5f550346895dce4383/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
PRT Implementation
• Phlebotomy Reduction Techniques– Bedside Minimal Volume Reference Guide– Venous safe-draw system– Exclusive microtube use with environmental
engineering– Blood Culture volume policy change
• Implementation Strategies– Educational Interventions– Nurse Champions– Audit and Feedback
![Page 16: WUSM Blood Conservation Phlebotomy Reduction Techniques Project](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051420/56815f5f550346895dce4383/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Study Design
![Page 17: WUSM Blood Conservation Phlebotomy Reduction Techniques Project](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051420/56815f5f550346895dce4383/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Post-Implementation Data
• Repeat detailed characterization of blood draws on 112 PICU patients
• Clinical Outcomes– Volume Overdrawn– Hemoglobin drop– Transfusion rate
![Page 18: WUSM Blood Conservation Phlebotomy Reduction Techniques Project](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051420/56815f5f550346895dce4383/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Study Design
![Page 19: WUSM Blood Conservation Phlebotomy Reduction Techniques Project](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051420/56815f5f550346895dce4383/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Implementation Assessment
• PICU Nursing Staff REDCap Survey• PICU Nursing Staff Focus Groups
• Implementation Outcomes– Acceptability (Perceived usefulness)– Adoption (Use of system)
![Page 20: WUSM Blood Conservation Phlebotomy Reduction Techniques Project](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051420/56815f5f550346895dce4383/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
AcknowledgementsContributors:
Washington University• Allan Doctor, MD• Philip Spinella, MD• Enola Proctor, PhD• Julie Hoerr, BSN, MSN• Richard Griffey, MD• Jennifer Jaffe, MPH, CCRP• Jessica Richards, RN, BSN, CCRN
Harvard University• Stacey Valentine, MD
Helen DeVos Children’s Hospital• Nabil Hassan, MD
Support at WUSM:
WUSM Pediatric Critical Care Translational Research Program• Lead by Philip Spinella• 7 Research Personnel
ICTS Dissemination and Implementation Methods Core• Supported by WUSM CTSA Award• Grant Number NIH UL1 RR024992
Washington University Network for Dissemination and Implementation Research
ICTS Research Design and Biostatistics Group