W.S. Graves, ASAC Review, Sept 18-19, 2003 Accelerator Overview Goals for proposal Description of...
-
Upload
jasmine-french -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of W.S. Graves, ASAC Review, Sept 18-19, 2003 Accelerator Overview Goals for proposal Description of...
W.S. Graves, ASAC Review, Sept 18-19, 2003
Accelerator Overview•Goals for proposal
•Description of technical components: injector, linac, compressors, etc.
•Summary of technical challenges
•Elements of R&D program
William S. GravesMIT-Bates Laboratory
Presentation to MIT X-ray laser Accelerator Science Advisory
Committee
September 18-19, 2003
W.S. Graves, ASAC Review, Sept 18-19, 2003
1. Describe an integrated laser laboratory integrating sources that span the visible to x-ray wavelengths.
2. Produce accelerator and laser design for a user facility.
3. Increase the user community’s perception that required accelerator and laser technologies are mature.
Goals for proposal
Three key attributes:1. Many beamlines are planned, each running at 1 kHz or more.
2. Laser wavelengths spanning visible to x-ray are available in a single facility.
3. Seeding for longitudinal coherence at all wavelengths is included in the initial design.
W.S. Graves, ASAC Review, Sept 18-19, 2003
A brief history of the MIT effort
•Spring 2002
D. Moncton approaches R. Milner about the possibility of an x-ray FEL at Bates lab.
•Summer 2002
Workshop held at Bates on the source technologies.
•Spring 2003
Proposal for 4 GeV user facility submitted to NSF. Collaboration meeting held for contributors to proposal.
•Summer 2003
User program committee meets.
•Fall 2003
First accelerator concept review. Today!
W.S. Graves, ASAC Review, Sept 18-19, 2003
1. High repetition rate photoinjector, cathode, drive laser.
2. SRF sections, preferably CW, including 3rd harmonic cavity.
3. Bunch compressors.
4. Electron beam switchyard to undulator halls.
5. Seed lasers, HHG generation.
6. FEL output properties, undulator layout.
Technical Components
Little presentation on x-ray components and diagnostics, or electron beam diagnostics.
W.S. Graves, ASAC Review, Sept 18-19, 2003
Facility layout
0.3 nm 0.1 nm
UV Hall X-ray Hall
Nanometer Hall
SC Linac4 GeV2 GeV1 GeV
1 nm
0.3 nm
100 nm
30 nm
10 nm
10 nm
3 nm
1 nm
Master oscillator
Pump laser
Pump laser
Seed laser
Seed laser
Seed laser
Pump laser
Fiber link synchronization
Injector laser
Undulators
Undulators
Undulators
Future upgrade to 0.1 nm at 8 GeV
SC Linac
W.S. Graves, ASAC Review, Sept 18-19, 2003
Key accelerator elements and issues
Photoinjector
SRF
linac
SRF
linac
Bunch
compress
or
Ebeam
switch
Undulators
Photocathod
e laser
Photocathode laser: Timing and power stability
Photoinjector: Produce low emittance ebeam at 5% duty
factor
Linac: Rf amplitude and phase
Compressor: Produce high peak current ebeam, low CSR.
Switch: Rate, stability
Undulators: Tunability, variable length
Seed lasers: HHG generation, stable operation, timing
Seed laser
W.S. Graves, ASAC Review, Sept 18-19, 2003
Photoinjector
3 cell pulsed room temperature cavity operating at 10 kHz
-presentation by Manouchehr Farkhondeh
W.S. Graves, ASAC Review, Sept 18-19, 2003
Direct diode-pumped, fiber amplifier
-presentation by Franz Kaertner
Yb:fiber amplifierIPG-Photonics
20ps, 10J, 1-10 kHz@ 1064 nm
4th-Harmonic
20ps, 1J, 1-10 kHz@266 nm
Yb:YAG, 1ps
rep. Rate100 MHz
Pulse Selector
Temporal: Flat-top shaped
Photoinjector drive laser
Acousto-OpticProgrammablePulse Shaper
(Dazzler,Fastlight)
W.S. Graves, ASAC Review, Sept 18-19, 2003
Beam dynamics, bunch compression
-presentation by Fuhua Wang
W.S. Graves, ASAC Review, Sept 18-19, 2003
Electron beam switchyard
100 20 30 40 50 m
RF/Ferrite switch, 5 mr
Septum Magnet, 150 mr
Dipole Magnet, 350 mr
Undulator
Undulator, Beam Line Hall
Accelerator
10 20 30
-presentation by Jan van der Laan
W.S. Graves, ASAC Review, Sept 18-19, 2003
Laser seeding
Noble Gas Jet (He, Ne, Ar, Kr)
100 J - 1 mJ
@ 800 nm
XUV @ 3 – 30 nm
= 10-8 - 10-5
Recombination
Propagation
-Wb
XUV
En
erg
y
x
b
0
Laser electric field
Ionization)(17.30 pbc UWN
Cut-off Harmonic:
-presentation by Franz Kaertner
W.S. Graves, ASAC Review, Sept 18-19, 2003
FEL output properties
0 10 20 30 40 500
0.5
1
1.5
2
Time (fs)
Pow
er (
GW
)
0 10 20 30 40 500
0.5
1
1.5
2
Time (fs)
Pow
er (
GW
)
0 10 20 30 40 500
0.5
1
1.5
2
Time (fs)
Pow
er (
GW
)
0 10 20 30 40 500
0.5
1
1.5
2
Time (fs)
Pow
er (
GW
)
0 10 20 30 40 500
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Time (fs)
Pow
er (
GW
)
0 10 20 30 40 500
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Time (fs)
Pow
er (
GW
)
0.2995 0.3 0.3005 0.3010
200
400
600
800
1000
Wavelength (nm)
Pow
er (
kW/b
in)
0.2995 0.3 0.3005 0.3010
200
400
600
800
1000
Wavelength (nm)
Pow
er (
kW/b
in)
0.2995 0.3 0.3005 0.3010
100
200
300
400
500
Wavelength (nm)
Pow
er (
MW
/bin
)
0.2995 0.3 0.3005 0.3010
100
200
300
400
500
Wavelength (nm)
Pow
er (
MW
/bin
)
0.2995 0.3 0.3005 0.3010
100
200
300
400
500
Wavelength (nm)
Pow
er (
kW/b
in)
0.2995 0.3 0.3005 0.3010
100
200
300
400
500
Wavelength (nm)
Pow
er (
kW/b
in)
Seeding for short pulses
Seeding for narrow bandwidth
SASE
W.S. Graves, ASAC Review, Sept 18-19, 2003
1. Achieve ~10 fs timing synchronization between FEL output, seed lasers, and pump-probe lasers.
2. Necessary RF phase and amplitude stability for timing above.
3. Stability in energy per pulse, timing, and pointing appropriate for a user facility.
4. Reduced power consumption for CW operation.
5. Reliable laser seed generation including tunability and stability.
6. Development of fast RF or ferrite switches necessary to deliver beam to multiple undulators.
7. Development of a high repetition rate, high brightness photoinjector.
8. Development of tunable undulators. Matching of undulator resonance. Rapid orbit correction at different wavelengths.
9. Electron beam diagnostics.
10.Coherent photon beam diagnostics.
Technical challenges
W.S. Graves, ASAC Review, Sept 18-19, 2003
NSF referee reports
•Proposal covers very large range of activities…difficult for individuals to review.
•Several referees recommend stronger R&D program.
•Doubts expressed about maturity of technologies.
•Reviews and our response to specific issues will be discussed Fri a.m.
Provide your input and feedback on the reviews and our response. Give advice on R&D issues and effort level.
Is substantial R&D necessary before proceeding to design stage? Identify best path forward.
MIT remains committed to building
an x-ray laser lab
W.S. Graves, ASAC Review, Sept 18-19, 2003
R&D program at Bates
Demonstrate some of the key technologies at lower energy including
1. Seeding with ultrashort HHG pulses
2. Development of tunable seed laser
3. Cascaded HGHG FEL output
4. Timing synchronization of FEL, seed, and pump lasers below 100 fs
Identify key R&D issues.
W.S. Graves, ASAC Review, Sept 18-19, 2003
Concluding remarks
•Concept is still at an early stage.
•Simulations of separate systems (injector, linac, switchyard, FEL) are underway, but not yet connected as a start-to-end effort.
•This review should assess the directions we are taking rather more than the initial results.