WRITTEN QUESTIONS TO BE PROPOUNDED TO THE · WRITTEN QUESTIONS TO BE PROPOUNDED TO THE CUSTODIAN OF...

WRITTEN QUESTIONS TO BE PROPOUNDED TO THECUSTODIAN OF RECORDS FOR PBSJ

Please provide your name, address, occupation and job title:

Answer:~-t).~;~J, T~ 78.,7

Please state whether or not you are the custodian of records for PBSJ..-- --

Answer: of°/!~-P~O~t,~. /~2~~/,t~o..4~ /6~,~..~e.~...~/-.~’-~’/-z’~

Have you been served with a subpoena duces tecum for the production of all documentsrequested to be produced in Exhibit B?

Answer:

Do you have in your custody or subject to your control the records requested in Exhibit

Are these documents, memoranda, reports, records or data compilations produced inresponse to the request for documents under your case, supervision, direction, custody and/orcontrol?

Were these documents, memoranda, reports, records or data compilations produced inresponse to the request for documents made at or near the time of the transaction recordedon these entries?

Answer: ~/~’~

T 49421

TJFA 209PAGE 001

o State whether or not it was in the regular course of business for an employee orrepresentative with personal knowledge of the event, condition, act or opinion recorded inthe documents requested to be produced in Exhibit B and records produced to the Nota~Public to make such memorandum or record or transmit the information which is includedin this record.

Answer:

go In the regular practice of PBSJ has PBSJ kept records of the type requested to be producedin Exhibit B in the normal course of business?

Answer:

Please hand exact duplicates of all records pertaining to Exhibit B (or the originals thereof)for photocopying to the Notary Public taking your deposition for the attachment to thedeposition. Have you done as requested? If not, why?

10. Have you been requested or directed to withhold any records, or has it been suggested by anyperson that any part of the records which are the subject of this deposition should be withheldor protected from discovery for this reason? If so, please state the name, address, andtelephone number of the person who conveyed this information to you and when such eventoccurred.

A/iswer:

II. Do you know whether or not, or do you have any reason to believe that the records that arethe subject of this deposition have in any manner been edited, purged, culled, or in anymanner made different from the way such records existed when created? If so, pleaseexplain your knowledge or belief in this regard.

Answer: port.)

7

T 49422

TJFA 209PAGE 002

12. Are there any records, documents, papers, correspondence, or tangible matter of any kindpertaining to documents requested to be produced by Exhibit B that you have not providedto the Notary Public taking your deposition?

13. Are you aware that it may be necessary to subpoena you or your employer at the time of thetrial of this case, if you have not provided the Notary Public taking your deposition allpapers, documents, records, correspondence, or tangible matter of any kind pertaining to thedocuments requested to be produced in Exhibit B?

Answer:

EXHIBIT "B"

DOCUMENTS REQUESTED

All documents concerning a July 2002 groundwater sampling event which took place at theApplied Materials’ property located at 9700 East Highway 290, Austin, Texas.

All documents concerning groundwater monitoring or groundwater sampling eventsoccurring at the Applied Materials’ property located at 9700 East Highway 290, Austin,Texas since July 2002 to present.

All documents reflecting communications between You and BFI concerning groundwaterconditions at the Applied Materials’ property located at 9700 East Highway 290, Austin,Texas.

All documents reflecting communications between You and any other person or entityconcerning groundwater conditions at the Applied Materials’ property located at 9700 EastHighway 290, Austin, Texas, including but not limited to communications with the TexasCommission on Environmental Quality (or its predecessor agencies), Waste Management(located at 9708 Giles Road, Austin, Texas), AnalySys and/or Applied Materials.

8

T 49423

TJFA 209PAGE 003

VERIFICATION

STATE OF TEXAS

COUNTY OF TRAVIS

BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, a Notary Public, in and for said County and State,personally appeared S~’e ~,, ~./~(c ~/e-~, known to me to be the person whose name issubscribed below, who after being duly sworn b~ me, upon Ms/her oath deposed and stated:

(1) that he/she is the person herein duly qualified and authorized to make this affidavit;

(2) that he/she has read the foregoing answers to the Notice of Intent to Take Deposition byWritten Questions and that all information and statements contained within those answersare within his/her own personal knowledge, and are true and correct.

FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT.

Signed this I ~’44, day of December, 2008.

[Print Name]

[Title]

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO by me, the undersigned Notary Public, on December2008.

Identification of Affiant confirmed by:

[]

[]

O

Known to Me .PersonallyProved to Me on the Oath ofTexas Driver’s License NumberOther Idemification

Notary Public in and for the State of Texas

~..

T 49424

TJFA 209PAGE 004

November 11,2002

Mr. Ashay AjgaonkarEnvironmental Engineering Program ManagerApplied Materials, Inc.M/S 36009700 U.S. Highway 290 EastAustin, Texas 78724-1199

Re: Proposal for Resampling of Selected On-site Monitoring Wells and Conducting a TCEQ FileReview for the Waste Management Inc. (WMI) Austin Community Landfill and the BFISunset Farms Landfill.

Dear Ashay:

PBS&J is please to submit this proposal and cost estimate for the above referenced project. Thisproposal is in response to recommendations contained in the recently completed ground watermonitoring report for the July 2002 sampling event. Due to the detection of relatively high totalorganic carbon (TOC) levels and tentatively identified compounds (TICs) within the semivolatileorganic range in wells MW-1A, MW-2, and MW-5A, the following was recommended to furtherinvestigate the presence of TICs.

TCEQ File ReviewPBS&J will conduct a review of the Texas Commission of Environmental Quality (TCEQ), formerlythe Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC), files for the Waste ManagementInc. (WMI) Austin Community Landfill and the BFI Sunset Farms Landfill. The objective of thereview is to obtain information on the ground water quality beneath the landfill sites and to evaluatethe data in the context of the ongoing ground water monitoring program at the Applied Material(AMI), Harris Branch Campus, which is located adjacent to the landfill sites. The data from the filereview will be utilized to aid in the evaluation of analytical data from samples recently collected fromAMI wells and to determine if additional parameters should be include in the suite of analyticalparameters currently being used in the AMI monitoring program.

PBS&J will review available information and make photocopies of relevant documents andcorrespondence. Summary tables of analytical results for ground water samples collected from thelandfill monitoring wells will be prepared for both the WMI and BFI sites. A memorandum will beprepared summarizing the findings of the file review and outlining any recommendations.

Resampling of Monitoring WellsPBS&J will collect ground water samples from wells MW-1A, MW-2, and MW-5 to confirm theresults of the July 2002 sampling event. A blank sample consisting of purified water will also besubmitted for analysis as a check on laboratory and field sampling cross-contamination. The blanksample will be handled exactly like the ground water samples. A split of each ground water andblank sample will be collected and submitted to a different analytical laboratory to verifying theprecision and accuracy of the analytical data. Samples will be submitted for TOC and semivolatileorganic compound (SVOC) "top ten" analyses. The objective of the resampling is to confirm thepresences of SVOCs in the ground water.

206 Wild Basin Road, Suite 300, Austin, Texas 78746-3343 ¯ Telephone: 512.329.8342. Fax: 5! 2.327.2453. www.pbsj.com

TJFA 209PAGE 005

Following completion of the sampling event, PBS&J will prepare a written letter report summarizingthe field activities performed and evaluating the analytical data.

Estimated CostPBS&J proposes to perform the work scope described above on a time and material basis inaccordance with the current contract. The estimated cost for the file review is $1,100 and $4,600 forground water resampling and analysis, for a total of $5,700. PBS&J will not exceed the estimatedcost without prior approval.

PBS&J appreciates the opportunity to provide this proposal and we look forward to assisting youwith this project. Please contact me at (512) 329-8342, ext 9586 if you have any further questionsconcerning the work scope or associated cost estimate.

Sincerely, ~

Martin Romanak, P.G.Manager, Geoscience

206 Wild Basin Road, Suite 300, Austin, Texas 78746-3343 ¯ Telephone: 512.329.8342 ¯ Fax: 512.327.2453 ¯ www.pbsj.com

TJFA 209PAGE 006

November 11, 2002


Proposal for Monitoring Well Installation and Well Plugging at the Applied Materials, Inc.Harris Branch Facility, Austin, Texas.

Dear Ashay:

PBS&J is please to submit this proposal and cost estimate to properly plug and abandon monitoringwell MW-2 and for the installation of a new replacement ground water monitoring well at the abovereferenced facility. Monitoring well MW-2 was damaged during recent construction activitiesassociated with Building 34. Based on available information, the protective steel casing, concretewell pad, and a portion of the surface and near surface PVC well casing were destroyed. Theconstruction contractor attempted to repair the well casing and modified the surface completion to abelow grade completion with manhole. No PBS&J or AMAT personnel observed these repair andmodification activities. The well is recommended for replacement due to the uncertaintiesassociated with the amount of actual damage to the well, how it was repaired, the possibility thatsome material or item was introduced into the well, and the lack of information regarding exactly howthe well was modified during roadway and parking lot construction.

Scope of WorkExisting monitoring well MW-2 will be plugged and abandoned by a State of Texas licensed welldriller. The driller shall complete abandonment and plugging of the monitoring well in accordancewith the requirements of 30 TAC 338.41 through 338.50 and shall certify proper abandonment. Anattempt will be made to remove the well casing from the ground. If this is not possible the remainingcasing and borehole will be plugged with a bentonite-cement slurry from the base of the well to thetop of former well casing within the manhole.

The new replacement monitoring well will be installed utilizing a truck-mounted drill rig equipped withhollow stem augers. The hollow stem augers and associated drilling equipment will be steamcleaned prior to drilling each monitoring well borehole. Well depth will range from approximately 30to 40 ft. The well will be constructed of 2-in ID, threaded, flush jointed, Schedule 40 PVC casingand screen. The screen interval will consist of 15 ft factory slotted (0.01 in) well screen. Clean,medium grained quartz sand will be placed in the annular space around the screen to a maximum of2 ft above the top of the screen. An impervious seal of bentonite pellets approximately 2 ft thick willbe placed directly on top of the sand filter pack. A bentonite-cement grout will then be emplacedwithin the remainin~l annular space to ground surface. A 6-in steel outer protective casing will beinstalled and a 3 ft° concrete pad with protective steel post will be constructed around the wellcasing. Following installation, the monitoring well will be developed to remove particulate matter andwater from the well screen and filter pack. A short report will be prepared detailing field methodsand well construction.

206 Wild Basin Road, Suite 300, Austin, Texas 78746-3343 ¯ Telephone: 512.329.8342 * Fax: 512.327.2453 ° www.pbsj,com

TJFA 209PAGE 007

Estimated CostPBS&J proposes to perform the work scope described above on a time and material basis inaccordance with the current contract at an estimated costof $3,805. A cost breakdown is presentedin Attachment 1. PBS&J will not exceed the estimated cost without prior approval.

PBS&J appreciates the opportunity to provide this proposal and we look forward to assisting youwith this project. Please contact me at (512) 329-8342, ext 9586 if you have any further questionsconcerning the work scope or associated cost estimate.

Sincerely,


206 Wild Basin Road, Suite 300, Austin, Texas 78746-3343 ¯ Telephone: 512.329.8342 ¯ Fax: 512.327.2453 ¯ www.pbsj.com

TJFA 209PAGE 008

ATTACHMENT I

COST ESTIMATEWELL PLUGGING AND WELL INSTALLATION

APPLIED MATERIALS HARRIS BRANCH FACILITY

(2)

Well Installation:PBS&J Labor Cost: 8 hrs @ $90/hr.PBS&J Non-Labor Cost (1): $35.00

Drilling SubcontractorWell Plugging and AbandonmentWell Installation and Materials

Well Installation Report:PBS&J Labor Cost: 4 hrs @ $90/hr

TOTAL

(1) Non-labor cost includes vehicle mileage and field supplies

$720$35

$750$1940

3360

$3805

TJFA 209PAGE 009

Client: PBS & JAttention: Martin RomanakProject: Applied MaterialsPhone: 329-8342Quote: 021106aDate Quoted: 11/6/02

Fax:

STL Austin14046 Summit Drive ¯ Austin, TX 78728

Phone (512) 244-0855 ¯ Fax (512) 244-0160

Analytical Price Quotation

Email: mromanak@pbsj.�om

Quote Valid Until: 3/31/03

Matrix

Water ICount

444

Description

SW9060, TOCSW8270C, SVOCsSW8270C, top ten TICsTOTAL

UnitPrice

$30.00$200.00

$25.00

ExtendedPrice

$120.00$800.00$100.00

$1020.00

Samples will be analyzed by the methods indicated and in accordance with standard laborato~ protocols. The pricesapply to a 14 day TAT from sample receipt and also include a sample bottle kit. Field QC samples including tripblanks are considered billable samples. Both standard hardcopy and electronic deliverables are provided. Sampleswill be kept in cold storage for one month after receipt and then transferred to ambient storage for one additionalmonth prior to sample disposal.

If you have questions or need any other information please feel free to call me at (512) 310-5249.

Respectfully,

Jane LindseyC~ient may order ~aboralory. consulting or sampling se~4cas from Severn Trent Laboratories, Inc. (STL}, a Delaware corporatiorr, and STL sholl ~ovifle o~ereO Sel’vtoes asspecified in these Terms and Conditions, and the related QuotaUon or Pflce Schedule, or as agreed in a negotiated contracL In the adse~ce of a w~t~en agreement to thecont~., any such order or deliver,/of samples constitules an acceptance by Ihe Client of STL’s offer to do business under these Terms and Conditions. and an agreement to bebound by these Terms and Conditions. No conb~W or additional terms and condilions expRssed in a Client’s dooJrnent shall be dee,ned Io become a part of the contract

1. ORDERS AND RECEIPT OF SAMPLES

1.2 Client shall provid¢ one week advance nedce of the sampl© d©livt~y schedule, or arff chang~ to the schedule, whenever po~s~lc. Upon timely delivcw of sample~, STL will use i~ best

1.3 Sample Delive~ Acceptanc© is the poh~t in time wh©n STL has determined that it can proceed with defined work following receipt, inspection of st~!)les, al~d r~oludon of anydiscrcpancie~ in Chain-of4:~tody fotxm a~d project guidance regarding work to be done, STL re~erves the risht, exercisable at azty d~e. to ref~e or" revoke Sample Delivery Acceptance for anysample which in the sole judgment of STL: a) is of u~uitable volume; b) may po~¢ a risk or become tmsuitable ~r handling, u’an~oR, or proofing for any health, ~af¢~,. environmental or othexreason, whether or nol due to the pr~ence in the sample of any hazardo~ sub~tance and whether o~ not such preset© hu been disd~ed to STL by the Client; or c) holding dme~ ¢a~mot be met,due to p~saga of more than 48 hour~ fro~ the time of sampling or t/2 the holding time fo~ the refuelled test, whichever is less.

2. PAYMENT TERMS

T 49430

TJFA 209PAGE 010

ci~acged or billed dil~(:tly to the ClienL The billing of a third pa~y will not be accepted without a statement, signed by the third pady, that anknowledges and accepts paymentresponsibility. STL may suspend work and withhold delivery Of ~ata under this order at any time in Ihe event Client fails to make timely payment of its invoices. Client shall beresponsible for all Costs and expenses of c~llectian thduding ressonable attorney’s fees, STL resen, es the r~ghl to refuse to p~oceed wRh work at any time based upon anunfavorable CDent credit report,

CHANGE ORDERS, TERMINATION

Changes to the Scope of Work, pHc=, or result deliver-/date may be initiated by STL af(~ Saraple D¢livez7 Acceptencc due to any condition wtiich �onfllcAs wh,h analytical, QA or other

3.:~ Suspmsion cr tu’nfination o1" all or any pan of the wc~k may be initiated by the Client- STL will be compensated consislent ~th Scion 2 ol~ these Terms and Condidon~. STL will

4. WARRANTIES AND IJABILITY

4. Z Wh~’e applleabl~. STL will ~� a,al~tic=l rrk’thndotogi= which ~ in subst~ndal cont~/wi~ published test m~thods. STL has implemenZed these m=hnds in its Labo~tor~ QualR~

RESULTS, WORK PRODUCT

Dau~ or int’ormation provided to STL or generated by services perfo~ned und~ this agreement shall become pr~m~ of ClienL Own~ship of any aeatyticai n,,cthod, QA/QC protocols,software programs or equipment developed by ~TL for pefforrmncc of work will be re~ained by ST/-, and Clicm shall nm disclose such in formtt~on to any third palr/.

5.2 Data and sample m~zcrials provided by Client o~ at Client’s rcquesl, and the rtsult obtained by STL shall be held in confidence (units such information is generally available to the publicor is in the public domain or Clicot has failed to pay STL t’c~ all services r~dered or is otherwise in breach of these Tram and Condltion.s), subject to and disclosure rcqdircd by law or legal

Unless a diff~’enl rime period is agreed Io in any orde~ unde~ these T~-zre; and Condi~ons, $TL agret~ to ~tain all records for t~vc (5) years.

INSURANCE

7. AUDIT

7.1 Upon prior notice Io STL, the Client may audit and inspect STL’s rccor~ and accounts �overing reimbursable costs, for a p~ed of ~wo (2) years after completion of the work. "rh¢

T 49431

TJFA 209PAGE 011

MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

T 49432

TJFA 209PAGE 012

of 2~

~ TGEOPROJEC S INTERNATIONAL, INC.FAX COVER SHEET

Date: 11/5/02

TO:

NAME: MARTIN ROMINAK

COMPANF PBS & J

FAX NO. 327.2453

PHONE NO. 329.8342

FROM:

RANDY DUFFY

GEOPROJECTS

COMMENTS:

Following is the proposal you requested for drilling, well installation

and abandonment at Applied ma~.d ,sis in Austin, TX.

Please feel free tg_~all with any questions or ff you need anything else~.

,,,,- ©

I I

T 49433

TJFA 209PAGE 013

No:.,OS-OZ 05:26pm Fro~OPROJECTS +51ZZ880SO6 T-U~ ~.UZ/O~ P-~I

GEOPROJECTS INTERNATIONAL,, 1NC.PROPOSAL, FOR DRILLING SERVICESPBS&JAPPLIED MATERIALSHIG~AY 290 EAS~A USTI~, TE~SPROPO~ NU~ER:PROPO~ DATE: 1115/~

DF.SCR!PrlON QTY UNITS UNIT RATE

Hollow Stem Auger Drillins, Condntmus

Hollow Stem Aul~,er Drilling, No Snmpling

Instal] 2-~-_c_-h PVC Moniu~ng Well

’smface Cc~npletkm (Uptight w/3 x 3 pad a~d 4i b artier pust~)

Plug and Abandon 2-inch x 40-t’~et TD PVCMo_n|mring Well .....

10

3O

40

1

0

!

l~mp

feet

f~t

fe~t

lump

hr

l,~.mp

lump

20.00

11,00

400.00

125.00

20O.00

750.00

TOTAL INVOICE AMOUNT

TOTAL

250.0O

750,0C

2002-215.PBS&J.4ppliedMaterial

T 49434

TJFA 209PAGE 014

An employee-owned company

September 27, 2002


Re: TCEQ File Review for the Waste Management Inc. (WMI)Austin Community Landfill andthe BFI Sunset Farms Landfill.

Dear Ashay:

PBS&J is please to submit this proposal and cost estimate for conducting a review of the TexasCommission of Environmental Quality (TCEQ), formerly the Texas Natural Resource ConservationCommission (TNRCC), files for the above referenced facilities. The objective of the review is toobtain information on the ground water quality beneath the landfill sites and to evaluate the data inthe context of the ongoing ground watermonitoring program at the Applied Material (AMI), HarrisBranch Campus, which is located adjacent to the landfill sites. The data from the file review will beutilized to aid in the evaluation of analytical data from samples recently collected from AMI wells andto determine if additional parameters should be include in the suite of analytical parameterscurrently being used in the AMI monitoring program.

PBS&J will review available information and make photocopies of relevant information. Summarytables of analytical results for ground water samples collected from the landfill monitoring wells willbe prepared for both the WMI and BFI sites. A memorandum will be prepared summarizing thefindings of the file review and outlining any recommendations.

PBS&J proposes to perform the work scope described above on a time and material basis at theestimated cost of $1,100 in accordance with the current contract. PBS&J will not exceed theestimated cost without prior approval. PBS&J appreciates the opportunity to provide this proposaland we look forward to assisting you with this project. Please contact me at (512) 329-8342, ext9586 if you have any further questions concerning the work scope or associated cost estimate.

Sincerely,


206 Wild Basin Road, Suite 300 ¯ Austin, lexas 78746 ¯ Telephone: 512.327.6840 ¯ Fax: 512.327.2453 ’, www.pbsj.com

T 49435

TJFA 209PAGE 015

206 Wild Basin Road, SmT~ 300 - Austin, Texas 78746-3343Tel: (512) 327-6840 ¯ Fax: (512) 327-2453

To: Applied Materials9700 U.S. Highway 290 East, M/S 3100-18Austin, Texas 78724-1199

ATTN: Ashay Ai~aonkar

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL

Date: October 9, 2002

Project No.: 440428.03Project Name: Applied Materials

We are sending you herewith via U.S Mail the following:

~ Prints ~ Specifications ~ Shop Drawings

Tracings Estimates Testing Lab ReportsSketches Bulletins Product SubmittalsCopies of Letter Samples Documents

2 Ground Water Monitoring Report - July 2002 (1 bound & 1 unbound)

These items are transmitted:

For your use I~]For your information/commentsAs requestedFor coordination purposesFor your approval/correctionOther

For field useFor your filesApproved as submittedApproved as notedNot approved; revise and resubmit

Remarks: Ashay:Give me a call ify0u have any questions.Thanks,Martin

Signed:

IF ENCLOSURES RECEIVED ARE NOT AS LISTED ABOVE, PLEASE NOTIFY US AT ONCE.

[Si’gne~rb:~:] \ - ~. --Copy to: File

M:~HgI~PROJECT$~APPLIED\Cr~imdXTRAN$16.wpd

T 49436

TJFA 209PAGE 016

.¢

3512 Montopolis Drive, Austin, Texas 78744 (512) 385-5886

FAX

Date:Time:Number of Pages to Follow:

Faz Number (512) 385-7411

T]EANSM][SS][ON COV]E]R

To:Of:Fax #:

From:

Message:

If you have any problems receiving this fax, please call AnslySys at (512) 385-5886

T 49437

TJFA 209PAGE 017

T 49438

TJFA 209PAGE 018

1760

Page 266

49439

TJFA 209PAGE 019

3512 Monmpolis Drive, Austin, Texas 78744 (512) 385-5886

Fax Number (512) 385-7411

FAX TRANSM][SS[ON

Date:Time: 7 :~-~-Number of Pages to Follow:

COVER SHEET

TO:Of:Fax #:

P&s 4.W

Message: __A~ k-.J

If you have any problems r~cgiving r.his fax, please call AnalySys at (512) 385-5886

T49440

TJFA 209PAGE 020

0

¯ rl ~ 0 ~ oft

f

t

T 49441

TJFA 209PAGE 021

T 49442

TJFA 209PAGE 022

-o

L 0

I--

T 49443

TJFA 209PAGE 023

T 49444

TJFA 209PAGE 024

i

T 49445

TJFA 209PAGE 025

3512 Montopolis Drive, Austin, Texas 78744 (512) 385-5886

Fax Number (512) 385~ 7411

FAX TRANSMiSSiON

Date: c/LT~ ~-Time: ~ s-;o 9Number of Pages to Follow: 3

Message:

If you have any problems receiving this fax, please call AnalySys at (512) 385-5886

T 49446

TJFA 209PAGE 026

g

T49447

TJFA 209PAGE 027

T 49448

TJFA 209PAGE 028

llllllll

Ill III

T 49449

TJFA 209PAGE 029

3512 Montopolis Dr.Austin, TX 78744 ¯ (512) 385-5886 ¯ FAX (512) 385-74I 1

Date: 9/10/2002Time: I6:08:35 /~Number of pages to foilow:~

To: Martin RomanakOf: PBS&JFAX #:327-2453

From: Richard LasterRE: 440428.03-010I

Message:

Printing/,Sending/F ,axing 19structio,,ns’

If you have any problems receiving this FAX transmission, please call AnalySys, Inc. at 512-444-58

T 49450

TJFA 209PAGE 030

............. ~$12 Montopolis Dr., Austin, TX 711744 &2209 N. Padre Island Dr., Corpus Christi, TX 78408

Client: PBS&JAttn: Martin RomanakAddress: 206 Wild Basin Rd, Ste 300

Austin, Tx 78746

Phone: 329-8342 FAX: 327-2453

~b ID#: 132008aI Project ID: 440428.03-0101Sample Name: MW-2Sample Matrix: waterDate Received: 09/09/2002Date Sampled: 07/31/2002

Report Date: 09110/02

Time: 15:43Time: l 1:40

Exlra_e~ble organics-62518270/Top Ten

10-Nonade._--~on e/TIC2,5-Dihydro-2,5-dime~oxyfurant~C3,3-Dimeth~l- l-buteneJT/C3,4-Dihydmxy-3--cyelobuten¢-1,2-d{one/I’IC3-Nitro-I H- 1,2,4-triazole/TIC

5-Methyl-2(SH)- thiophenone/l’ICCatrolactam/’HCN-Butyl-2-buten- l-amine/I’ICOctanethidc

PRELIMINARY REPORT OF ANALYSISResult

159055627O0106152630

6930216940

Units RQL 1

100IO0

1000loo100lOO1o0oIO0IO0

Blank Date

08/07/0208/0710208/0710208/0710208/07/0208107/0208/07/02081071020810710208/07102

Method

625 -625 & 8270e625 & 8270c625 & 8270c625 & 8270C625 & 8270c625 & 8270c625 & 8270c625 & 8270c

I. Rep~i-dng Quandtation Limit (RQL); typicall~ at or above the Prm:tical Quandtalion Limit (PQL) of the analyr.ical mcthod.

This prelirninaxy analytical z~x~ is respectfully submitted by AnalySys, Inc. Thc enclosed dma may not have t~r, eivcd final review for full compliance withAna]ySys, lnc.’s QA/QC program or for compZctcness. Although the reported results conr~ned h~reln are bclieved to bc correct, bas~ upon initial datareview, final QA/QC revicw may result in results ~fferent from those reported hewn. © Copyright 2000, AnalySys, Inc., Ausdn, TX, All HghtS rescrvcd,NO pan of this pub|i~at~on may be reproduced or transmitted in any t~rm or by any means without the express wHtmn conscnt of AnalySys, in~

Respectfully Submitted,

Page#: 1 T 49451 .....

TJFA 209PAGE 031

Client: PBS&JAttn: Martin RomanakAddress: 206 Wild Basin Rd, Ste 300

Austin, "Ix 78746

Phone: 329-8342 FAX: 327-2453

3512 Montopolls Dr., Austin, TX 78744 &2209 N. Padre Island Dr, Corpos Christi, "IX78408($12) 385-5886 ¯ FAX (512) 385-7411~

Report#/Lab ID#: 13201 laProject ID: 440428.03-0101Sample Name: MW-5Sample Matrix: wazerDate Received: 09/09/2002Date Sampled: 07/31/2002

Report Date: 09/i 0/02

Time: 15:43Time: 12:50

Parameter

Extra~-~--ble otgenics-625/8270/Top Ten

1,6-Dimethyl-3.pipeddinol/TlC2-Meday]-3-buzen-2-ol/HCCal~olactam/HC

PRELIMINARY PJ~PORT OF ANALYSISResult

305

2068

Units RQL!

I0IO10

Blank

ND

Date08/07/02

0W07/0208/07/0208/07/02

Method625 & 8270:

625 & 8270:625 & 8270:625 & 8270:

This preliminary analytical repozz is respectl’ully subroitr~! by AnalySys, inc. The enclosed data may not have received final review for full compliancc withA~la]ySys, lnco’s QAJQC program or for complcmaess. Although ~e reposed rcsu]rs con~ncd herein arc bcJieved to bc correct, ba.~ed upon t~da~ da~areview, final QA/QC r©vicw may resulz in results different from thosc repor~ hercin. © Copyright 2000. AnalySys, Jnc., Ausdn, TX, All rights rcscwcd,No part of Ibis publication may be reproduced or transmiz~-d in an), form or by an), means without tl~e express written conscn~ of AnalySy$, lnc,

Respectfully Submitmd,

Paee#: I T 49452 .....

TJFA 209PAGE 032

3512 Montopolis Dr., Austin, TX 78744 &2209 N. Padre Island Dr., Corpus Christi, ~ 78408

Client: PBS&JAttn: Martin RomanakAddress:206 Wild Basin Rd, Ste 300

Austin, Tx 78746

Phone: 329-8342 FAX: 327-2453

Report#/Lab ID#: 132007aProject ID: 440428.03-0101Sample Name: MW-IASample Matrix: waterDate Received: 09/09/2002Date Sampled: 07/31/2002

Report Date: 09/I 0/02

Time: 15:43Time: 09:20

PRELIMINARY REPORT OF ANALYSIS_rar’am~-=~- Result Units RQL 1 B!~nkEx~_¢_t’-_:b!e O~,3~nieS.625/8270/Top Ten ...........

4,4’-Burylide-n-eb~s[2-(1, l -dime~hylethyl ) .5.m 23 ~g/L I0 NDUknown Amine 440 pg/L ! 0 ND

Date Method

08/07/02 625 & 8270c08/07/02 625 & 8270c

l. R~ng RQL): pically ~t Or ~bov~ ~ Pracdcai Quantita~on Li~i (PQ ~’~e aria d~

~is prelimin~ an~c~ r~ is ~ly submi~ ~ AnalySys, ]nc, ~c enclo~ da= may no~ have r~v~ fin~ ~ev/cw for full ~mpliancc with~ySys, lnc.’s Q~ pm~ or for compl~s. Alth~gh ~ ~n~ ~]ts con~in~ herein ~ ~iev~ to ~ �on~ bas~ u~n tnifid da~ravin, final Q~QC review may ~sult in rcsul~ diffcmnt f~m ~ose r~o~ hewn. ~ Cop~ght 2000, AnalySys, in~, Aura, ~, A]I rights re~.No ~ of this publi~6~ may ~ ~mduccd w ~ns~t~ in any fo=~ ~ by ~y mc~$ without ~e ~pmss wd~ ~n~t of A~ySys, Inc.

~s~gy Sub~K~,

Page#: I T49453 -- -

TJFA 209PAGE 033

www.analysysinc.com [] 3512. Montopolis Dr., Austin, Texas 78744 [] (512) 385-5886 [] FAX: ~512) 385-7411

Sample Analysis Case Narrative & Exceptions Report

Client: [D~ S ~"- Project ID: L~)~, ~3"~16[

Attn: /~¢~ ~ ~Ov~t~c~

T 49454

TJFA 209PAGE 034


June 18, 2002


Semiannual Ground Water Monitoring for the Applied Materials, Inc.Harris Branch Campus

Dear Ashay:

PBS&J is please to submit this revised proposal and cost estimate for ground watermonitoring at the above referenced facility. A total of seven existing wells (MW-1A, MW-2, MW-3A, MW-4, MW-5, MW-7 and MW-8) will be sampled (MW-6 will also be sampled if ground wateris observed in the well).

Table 1 presents a list of analytical parameters for the ground water samples. Samples fromthe wells will be analyzed for the organic indicator parameters (i.e., TOC and TOX), volatile organiccompounds (VOCs), semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs) and several metals/inorganicparameters.

Steps to be performed during collection of ground water samples from onsite monitoringwells will include measuring the depth to water in each well being sampled, purging well of stagnantwater, recovery of the sample, and measurement of field water quality parameters as follows.

Water levels will be measured with an electric water level sensor to the nearest 0.01 ftfi’om a reference point at the top of casing.

Well depth, diameter, and water level will be used to calculate the volume of water in thewell casing. Prior to sample collection, a minimum of three well volumes will be purgedfrom each well using a dedicated bailer.

Once the water level has recovered following purging, ground water samples will becollected using bottom filling hand bailers. Samples will be transferred directly to jarscontaining proper preservatives, sealed, and labeled.

The field parameters pH, temperature, and specific conductance will be measured in thefield using calibrated and standardized instruments.

206 Wild Basin Road, Suite 300 ¯ Austin, Texas 78746 ¯ Telephone: 512.327.6840 ° Fax: 512.327.2453 ¯ www.pbsj.com

T 49455

TJFA 209PAGE 035

Mr. Ashay AjgaonkarJune 18, 2002Page 2

Following completion of the sampling event, PBS&J will prepare a written reportsummarizing the field activities performed and evaluating the analytical data.

Estimated costs are summarized on Table 2. PBS&J proposes to perform the work scopedescribed above on a time and material basis at the estimated cost of $8,120 in accordance with thecurrent contract. PBS&J will not exceed the estimated cost without prior approval. The costestimate assumes the collection and analysis of seven ground water samples and one QA/QC sample(i.e., trip blank). PBS&J appreciates the opportunity to provide this proposal and we look forwardto assisting you with this project. Please contact me at (512) 329-8342, ext 9586 if you have anyfurther questions concerning the work scope or associated cost estimate.

Sincerely,

Martin RomanakManager, Geoscience

Enclosure

T 49456

TJFA 209PAGE 036

TABLE 1ANALYTICAL PARAMETER LIST

Parameter Analytical Method Number of Samples

Volatile Organic Compounds 8260B 3

Semivolatile Organic Compounds 8270C 3

Total Organic Carbon (TOC) 9060 7

Total Organic Halides (TOX) 9020 7

Total Dissolved Solids 160.1 7

Arsenic 6010B 7

Barium 6010B 7

Cadmium 6010B 7

Chromium 6010B 7

Iron 6010B 7

Lead 6010B 7

Manganese 6010B 7

Mercury 7470 7

Selenium 6010B 7

Zinc 6010B 7

Alkalinity, total 310.1 7

Calcium 6010B 7

Chloride 9251 7

Magnesium 6010B 7

Nitrate/Nitrite-N 353.1 7

Potassium 6010B 7

Sodium 6010B 7

Sulfate 9038 7

1 trip blank (VOCs only)

Detection limits as reported during past sampling events

T 49457

TJFA 209PAGE 037

TABLE 2APPLIED MATERIALS

JULY 2002 GROUND WATER MONITORINGCOST ESTIMATE

(1) Mobilization/preparation, Sample Collection and Water Level Measurements:PBS&J Labor Cost: 16 hrs @ $65/hr.PBS&J Non-Labor Cost o): $75.00

(2) Sample Analysis:

Organic Indicator Parameters and Metals/lnorganics7 Ground Water Samples @ $340/sample

Volatile and Semivolatile Organic Compounds7 Ground Water Samples @ $440/sample

Volatile Organic Compounds1 Trip Blank Sample @ $165/sample

(3) Project Managemem, Data Interpretation and Report Preparation

PBS&J Labor Cost: 12 hrs @ $115/hr

TOTAL

Non-labor cost includes vehicle mileage and field supplies

$1,040$75

$2,380

$3,080

$165

$8,120

T 49458

TJFA 209PAGE 038


FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL

Project No. ~/’~) ~ 67~

No. of Pages ~,/(incl, cover)

Remarks:

206 Wild Basin, Suite 300, Austin. Texas 78746-3343 512.327.6840 - fox 512.327.24.=

T 49459

TJFA 209PAGE 039

ESPEY, HUSTON G ASSOCIATES, INC.Engineering g Environmental Consultants

WELL COMPLETION LOG

SITE Applied Materials

LOCATION Harris Branch, AustinX = 8843.3411 Y = 2751.8003

Travis County, TX

CONTRACTORDRILLERSUPERVISED BY

TIME LOB

Professional Service Industries, lnc.C. BradshawM.Romanak

START FINISH

OATE TIME DATE TIME

ORILLING 04127192 0B: 00 04/27/92 Og: 30COMPLETION 04127192 0g: 30 04/27/g2 ! !; 30DEVELOPMENT 04/29/92 ! 1:00 04/29/92

HOI E DIMENSIONSDiameter: 6.0 inch {0 - 32.0 ft)

WELL NO. MW- IA

INSTALLATIONS

PROTECTIVE CASING ELEVSURFACE PAO ELEV

WELL CASING ELEVATIONSURFACE ELEV

WELL DEPTH

HOLE NO. M~- |__A

622.05 ft mslft msl

HOLE DEPTH

CMEHOllOw Stem Augers

None

STATIC WATER LEVELS DEPTH

DATE TIME BE~?W

OB/t6/93 10:35 18.32 ft, .~-

Bentonite (Hole Plug) 5/8 in.1.0 - 50 ~b bag9.5 - 12.5 ft

RIG MAKE/MODELORILLING METHODORILLING FLUID

ANNULAR SEALMaterial:0uantity:Interval:

Material: Schedule 40 PVCDiameter: 2.0 inchLengths: t0-ft jo=ntsJoints: Flush threadedIntervals: +3. - 15.0 ft

30.0 -.30.3 ft (bottom cap)

ANNULAR GROUTMaterial: Neat cementAdditives: Powdered bentonite [3% by wgt)Placement: Pouredguantity: t.5 sacks cementInterval 0 - 9.5 ft

Material: ScheDule 40 PVCDiameter: 2.0 inchJoints: Flush threadedOpenings: Factory slotted

{0.01Q-inch slot)Intervals: !5,0 - 30.0 ft

SURFACE PADWell Pad: 3 X 3 Concrete Pad

(3) 4 in Stell Pipe Bumper GuardsFilled w/Concrete

Interval: NIA

FILTER PACKMaterial: Washed silica sandPlacement: PouredQuantity: 300 Ib]nterval: 12.5 - 32.0 ft

WELL SECURITYCasing: 4 in Protective Steel Casing

w/Hinge0 Lid and Pa01ockinterval: +2.5 - 2.5 ft

DEVELOPMENTWell developed using Teflon Hand BailerPurged (4) well volumes (8.5 gal)

COMMENTS

tO

15

T 49460 -

TJFA 209PAGE 040

ESPEY, HUSTON & ASSOCIATES, INC.Engineering ~; Environmental Consultants

WELL COMPLETION LOGWELL NO.

HOLE NO.

PROTECTIVE CASING ELEVSURFACE PAD ELEV

SITE Applied Materials WELL CASING ELEVATIONLOCAl;ION Harris Branch. Austin SURFACE ELEV

X = 9489.7089 Y = 3988.8327 WELL DEPTHTravis County. TX HOLE 0EPTH

MN-3A

MW-3A

608.78 ft mslft msl

608.56 ft msl606.4 ft msl

30.0 ft30.0 ft

CONTRACTOR Professional Service Inclustries. [nc.DRILLER C. BraashawSUPERVISED BY M.Romanak

RIG MAKE/MODELORILLING METHODDRILLING FLUID

CMEHollow Stem Auqers

None

TIME LOB5TART FINISH

DATE TIME DATE TIME

DRILLING 04127/92 08:O0 04/27192 09:30COMPLETION 04127192 09:30 04127/92 11:30OEVELOPMENT 04/29/92 11:00 04/29/92 12:15

STATIC WATER LEVELSOEPTHBELOW

DATE TIME GL

08/16/g3 g: 30 6.58 ft

HOLF DTMFN~; ION~;Diameter: 6.0 inch [0 - 32.0 ft)

Material: Scheclule 40 PVCDiameter: 2.0 inchLengths: 10-ft jointsJoints: Flush threadeclIntervals: +3. - 15.0 ft

30.0 - 30.3 ft (bottom cap)

Material: Schedule 40 PVCDiameter: 2.0 inchJoints: Flush threadedOpenings: Factory slotted

(O.010-inch slot)Intervals: 15.0 - 30.0 ft

FILTER PACKMaterial: Washed silica sandPlacement: PouredOuantity: 300 IbInterval: 12.5 - 32.0 f!

INSTALLATIONS

ANNULAR SFALMaterial: Bentonite (Hole Plug) 5/8 in.0uantity: 1.0 - 50 Ib bagInterval: 9.5 - 12.5 ft

ANNULAR GROUTMaterial: Neat cementAdditives: PowOere(I bentonite (3% by wgt)Placement: PouredOuantity: 1,5 sacks cementInterval 0 - 9.5 ft


(3) 4 in Stall Pipe Bumper GuardsFilled w/ Concrete

Interval: N/A

WELL SECURITYCasing: 4 in Protective Steel Casing

w/Hinged Lid an~l PadlockInterval: +2.5 - 2.5 ft

DFVFLOPMENTWell developed using Teflon Hand BailerPurged (4) well volumes (8.5 gel)

COMMFHT~

5

I0

T 49461 -

TJFA 209PAGE 041

~ ESPEY, HUSTON G ASSOC]ATES, ]NC.


HOLE NO.

PROTECTZVE CASZNG ELEVSURFACE PAD ELEV

SITE Al:~)lled Materials MELL CASING ELEVATIONLOCATION Harris Branch, Austin SURFACE ELEV

X :," 10008.82 Y : 488L83 WELL DEPTHTravis County~ TX HOLE DEPTH

MW-4MW-4

809.51 ft mslft msl

609.15 ft mslft msl

28.0 ft28.0 ft

CONTRACTOR 6eoProJects Intemational~ Inc.DRILLER A. SeroanoSUPERVISED BY S. McVey

TIME LOB

DATE

START

DR~LL3N6 t2/08/95COMPLETIONDEVELOPMENT t2/12/95

I~NE

10:3512:50

RIG NAKEINODELORILLIN6 METHODDRILLING FLUID

FINISH

DATE TIME

12/08/95 t1:55t2/0B/95 t3:30|2112/95

Mobile B-81Hollow Stem Augers

None

STATIC MATER LEVELSDEPTHBELOW

DATE TIME EL

12/13/95 t0:25 18.65 ft

INSTALLATIONS

Diameter: 8.0 inch (0 - 28.0 ft) MateriaL" BentoNte (Hole Plug) 5/8 I~Ouantity: L0 - 60 Ib bagInterval: 8.0 - 11.0 ft

Materla~ Schedule 40 PVCDiameter: 2.0 inchLengths: lO-ft jointsJoint~ Flush threadedIntervals: +3. - 13.0 ft

28.0 ~ 28,3 ft (bottom cap)

ANNULAR GROUTMaterial: Neat cementAdditives: Powdered bentonite (3~ by wgt)Placement: Poured0uantity: 2.0 sacks cementInterval 0 - 8.0 ft

Material: Schedule 40 PVCDiameteP: 2.0 inchJoint~: Flush threadedOPenings: Factory slotted

(O.010-1nch slot)Intervals: 13.0 - 28.0 ft


(3) 4-in DI Steel Pipe Bumper GuardsFilled w/Concrete

]ntervel: N/A

Material: Mashed silica sandPlacement: PouredO~antlty: 500 Ib]nterval: 1LO - 28.0 ft

Casing: 4-in DI Protective Steel Casingw/Hinged Lid and Padlock

Interval: +3.0 - 2.5 ft

rl~VF[ OPMFNTNell developed using Teflon Hand BailerPurged (5) well volumes (8.0

15

25

T 49462

TJFA 209PAGE 042

Ii~ ESPEY, HUSTON g ASSOCIATES, INC.

Engineering G Environnental Cons~tants.

WELL COMPLETION LOGWmL NO.HOLE NO.


SITE Applied Materials t~ELL CASING ELEVATIONLOCATION Harris Branch~ Austin SURFACE ELEV

X - 0088.23 Y - 1528.27 WELL DEPTHTravis County: Tx HOLE DEPTH

MH-5

616.93 ft mslft msi

818.62 ft matft msl

40.0 ft42.0 ft

CONTRACTOR BeoProjects Internatlonel~ Inc,DRILLER A,. SeroanoSUPERVISED BY S. McVey

TIME LOBSTART

DATE TIME

DRILLING 12/07/95 t2:30~OHPLETION 12/08/95 13:55~VELOPNENT t2/12/95

RIO HAKE/MODELDRILLING METHODDRILLING FLUID

FINISH

DATE TIME

12/07195 14:0512/08/95 14:2512/12/95

Mobile B-0IHollow Stem Augers

None

STATIC HATER LEVELSDEPTHBELO~

DATE TIME EL

12113/95 13:45 7.16 ft

Diameter: 6.0 inch (0 - 42,0 ft)

Material: Schedule 40 PVCDiameter: 2,0 InchLengths: t0-ft iointsJoints: Flush threadedIntervals: +3, - 20,0 ft

40,0 - 40,3 ft (bottom c~o)

Material: Schedule 40 PVCDiameter: 2.0 InchJoints: Flush threadedOpenIngs: F~ctory slotted

(O.OlO-inch slot)Intervals: 20.0 - 40.0 ft

FILTFR PACKMaterial: Hashed silica sandPlacement: PouredQuantity: 800 tbInterval: ’ 18,0 - 42,0 ft

INSTALLATIONS

Material: Bentonite (Hole Plug) 518 in.Quantity: LO - 50 It) bag]ntervat 15,0 - 16.0 ft

ANNULAR e;ROlJTMaterial: Neat cementAdditives: Powdered bentonite (3~ by wgt)Placement: PouredOuantity: 4,0 sacks cementInterval 0 - 15,0 ft

Hell Pad: 3 X 3 Concrete Pad(3) 4-in DI Steel Pipe Bumper GuardsFilled w/Concrete

Interval:. N/A

Casing: 4-in DI Protective Steel Casingw] Hinged Lid and Padlock

Interval: +3,0 - 2,5 ft

Hell developed using Teflon Hand BailerPurged (5) well vobmes (24 get)

20.

3O

40

T 49463

TJFA 209PAGE 043

~ (::~ .~ ESPEY, HUSTON ~; ASSOCIATES, INC.Engineedng i; Emiro~tai ConsuitaMs.

WELL COMPLETION LOGNELL NO.

HOLE NO.


SUrE Applied Materials #ELL CASING ELEVATIONLOCATION Harris Branch~ Austin SURFACE ELEV

X = ,839.20 Y - 2412.70 WIELL DEPTHTravls County~ TX HOLE DEPTH

MW-BMW-B

500.40 ft mslft msl

599.02 ftft msl

35.0 ft42.0 ft

CONTRACTOR SeoProlecls Internation~ I~. RI6 MAKE/MODEL Mobile B-01DRILLER A. Seroano DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem AugersSUFI~RVI~O BY S. NcVey O~ILLIN6 FLUm None

TIME LOGSTART

DATE

ORILLINB i2/07/95COMPLETION 12/08/95DEVELOPMENT t2/t2/95

FINISH

TIME DATE TIME

I0:20 1:)/08/95 09:1514:35 12/08/95 15:20

12112/95

STATIC WATER LEVELS

DATE TINE

OEPTHBELOWGL

Diameter: 8.0 inch (0 - 35.5 ft)

Material: Schedule 40 PVCDiameter:. 2.0 inchLengths: K)-ft JointsJoints: Flush tlveacledIntervals: +3. - 15.0 ft

35.0 - 35.3 ft (bottom cap)

Material: Schedule 40 PVCDiameter: 2.0 inchJoints: Flush threadedOpenings: Factory slotted

(O.OlO-Inch slot)Intervals: 15.0 - 35.0 ft

Material: Washed silica sandPlacement: PouredOuantity: 000 IbInterval: 13.0 - 35.5 ft

INSTALLATIONS

Naterlat Bentonite (Hole Plug) 5/8 In.Quantity: LO - 50 Ib bagInterval: K).O - t3.0 ft

A~INUtAR GROUTNatarial: Neat cementAdditives: Powdered bentonite (3X by wgt)Placement: PouredOuantity: 3.0 sacks cementInterval 0 - 10.0 It

Well Pad: 3 X 3 Concrete Pad(3) 4-in DI Steel Pipe Bumper GuardsFilled w/Concrete

Interval: N/A

Casing: 4-in DI Protective Steel Casingw/Hinged Lid and Padlock

Interval: +3.0 - 2.5 ft

COMMFNTSNo water observed in wee at the time of development or samplin~.

40

T 49464

TJFA 209PAGE 044


HOLE NO.

SITE Applied Materials/Lief Johnson Ford SiteLOCATION 9700 U.S. Hwy. 290 East

X = 8886.00 Y = 1532.00Travis Co. County, TX



WELL DEPTHHOLE DEPTH

MW-7MW-7

ft mslft msl

617.00 ft mslft msl

40.0 ft42.0 ft

CONTRACTOR GeoProjects International, Inc. RIG MAKE/MODEL Mobile 8-610RILLER B. Hinoiosa DRILLING METHOG Hollow Stem AugersSUPERVISED BY S. McVe~/ DRILLING FLUID None

TIME LOGSTART FINISH

DATE TIME OATE TIME

DRILLING 07/07/99 t4:00 07/07/99 15:15COMPLETION 07/07/99 t5:55 07/07/99 17:45DEVELOPMENT 07/07/99 t9:05 07/07/99 19:30

STATIC HATER LEVELS

BATE TIME

DEPTHBELOW

GL

07/08/99 08:4007/22/99 11:00

21.30 ft7.67 ft

Diameter: 8.0 inch (0 - 42 ft)

Material: Sch 40 PVCDiameter: 2.0 inchLengths: 10-ft jointsJoints: Flush threadedIntervals: 0.2 - 20.0 ft

Material: Sch 40 PVCDiameter: 2.0 inchJoints: Flush threadedOpenings: Factory Slotted

(O.Ot0-inch slot)Intervals: 20.0 - 40.0 ft

FILTER PACKMaterial: Washed silica sandPlacement: Gravity feedInterval: 18.0 - 42.0 ft

INSTALLATIONS

ANNULAR SEALMateria!: Bentonite pelletsPlacement: Gravity feedInterval: 16,0 - 18.0 ft

ANNULAR GROUTMaterial: Neat cementAdditive: Powdered bentonite (3% by wgt)Interval: 2.0 - 16.0 ft

SURFACE PADWell Pad: 3-ft x 3-ft x 0.25-ft concreteInterval: +0.25 - 2.0 ft

WELL SECURITYCasing: 6-inch (~ manhole cover w/ locking cap

Hand bailed a total of 5 gallons. Water slightlyturbid, no odor.

COMMENTSNo visual evidence of contamination

T 49465

TJFA 209PAGE 045


HOLE NO.

SITE Applied Materials/Former Diamond Shamrock SiteLOCATION 9700 U.S. Hwy. 290 East

X = 8460.00 Y = 1220.00Travis Co. County, TX



WELL DEPTHHOLE DEPTH

MW-8MW-8

ft mslft msl

622.50 ft mslft msl

40.0 ft41.0 ft

CONTRACTOR GeoProiects International, Inc. RIG MAKE/MODEL Mobile B-B!DRILLER B. Hinoiosa DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem AugersSUPERVISED BY S. McVey DRILLING FLUID None

TIME LOGSTART FINISH

DATE TIME DATE TIME

ORILLIN6 07/07/99 08:35 07/07/99 11:45COMPLETION 07/07/99 17:50 07/08/99 09:35OEVELOPNENT 07/07/99 t8:20 07/07/99 18:30

STATIC HATER LEVELS

DATE TIME

DEPTHBELOW

GL

07/08/99 08:5007/22/99 11:50

34.60 ft8.55 ft

Diameter: 8.0 inch (0 - 4! ft)

Material: Sch 40 PVCDiameter: 2.0 inchLengths: 10-ft jointsJoints: Flush threadedIntervals: 2,5 - 20.0 ft

Material: Sch 40 PVCDiameter: 2.0 inchJoints: Flush threadedOpenings: Factory Slotted

(O.010-inch slot)Intervals: 20.0 - 40.0 ft

Material: Hashed silica sandPlacement: Gravity feedInterval: 17.0 - 41.0 ft

INSTALLATIONS

Material: Bentonite pelletsPlacement: Gravity feedInterval: 15.0 - !7.0 ft

ANNULAR GROUTMaterial: Neat cementAdditive: Powdered bentonite (3% by wDt)interval: 3.0 - !7,0 ft

Hell Pad: 3-ft x 3-ft x 0.25-ft concretepad with steel pipe set atcorners and filled w/ concrete

Interval: +0,25 - 3.0 ft

WELL SECURITYCasing: 4-inch 9 steel pipe w/himged lid

and hasp for padlock

Hand bailed dry (approximately 1 gallon). Water wasturbid, no odor.

(~OMMFNTSNO visual evidence of contamination

T 49466

TJFA 209PAGE 046


June 18, 2002

Mr. Ashay Ajgaonkar, CIHEnvironmental/l!-I Program ManagerApplied Materials, Incorporated9700 U.S. Highway 290 East, M/S 3600Austin, Texas 78724-1199

Re; Cost Estimates for Sample Collection and Analysis of Wastewater Samples for the April 1,2002 through September 30, 2002 Monitoring Period at the Applied Materials Harris BranchCampus

Dear Ashay:

PBS&J is pleased to submit this scope of work and associated cost estimate to collect andanalyze wastewater samples as per Applied Materials Inc.’s (AMI) City of Austin Wastewater PermitNo. 68831021. In October 2000, the wastewater permit was revised by the City of Austin (COA)to reflect a decrease in the monitoring requirements for Total Toxic Organics (TTOs). TTOs arenow required to be monitored during the first semiannual monitoring period which covers the periodfrom October 1 through March 31. Samples for the second semiannual period do not require TTOanalysis. In addition, the permit has recently been amended by the COA to remove sample portoutfall (Outfall 001) and replace with two new sample port outfalls (Outfalls 002 and 003). Byadding an additional sampling location, the number of samples required for chemical analyses hasdoubled.

In accordance with the previously mentioned permit, PBS&J proposes to collect four grabsamples and one 24-hour composite wastewater sample from each of the sampling port outfallslocation upstream of the Harris Branch MUD, Lift Station No. 1. An ISCO automatic sampler willbe used for the 24-hour composite samples. Based on the AMI permit and comments from the COA,four grab samples will be collected and analyzed independently for pH and cyanide. Sample pH willbe measured in the field, immediately after sample collection. Each 24-hour composite sample willconsist of approximately 96 grab samples (collected once every 15 minutes for a 24-hour period) thatwill be composited into one sample and analyzed for the following inorganic parameters: arsenic,cadmium, chromium, copper, fluoride, lead, mercury, manganese, nickel, silver, and zinc.

Quality control reporting requirements of the permit stipulate that matrix spike/matrix spikeduplicate (MS/MSD) samples will be collected from each outfall once per permit year. SinceMS/MSD samples were collected during the first semiannual period (October 1,2002 through March31, 2002), no MS/MSD samples are required for the second semiannual period. Table 1 outlines thesample type and total number of samples to be collected for chemical analysis.

206 Wild Basin Road, Suite 300 ¯ Austin, Texas 78746 ¯ Telephone: 512.327.6840 ¯ Fax: 512.327.2453 ¯ www.pbsj.com

T 49467

TJFA 209PAGE 047

Mr. Ashay AjgaonkarJune 18, 2002Page 2

Upon completion of the sampling activities and receipt of the analytical data, PBS&J willprepare a report evaluating the findings. PBS&J will incorporate items listed in the permit underPart 1I B - Report Format, numbers 5 and 6. PBS&J has previously received information from AMIthat addressed items 1 through 4, and item 7 and will incorporate this information in the report tobe submitted to the COA.

Estimated costs are surmnarized on Table 2. PBS&J proposes to perform the work scopedescribed above on a time and material basis at the estimated cost of $5,281 in accordance with thecurrent contract. PBS&J will not exceed the estimated cost without prior approval. PBS&Jappreciates the opportunity to provide this proposal and we look forward to assisting you with thisproject. Please contact me at (512) 329-8342, ext 9586 if you have any further questions concerningthe work scope or associated cost estimate.

Sincerely,

Martin Romanak, P.G.Geoscience Program Manager

Attachments

T 49468

TJFA 209PAGE 048

T49469

TJFA 209PAGE 049

TABLE 2APPLIED MATERIALS

APRIL 1 TO SEPTEMBER 30 2002 WASTEWATER MONITORINGCOST ESTIMATE

(1) Mobilization/preparation, Sample Collection:PBS&J Labor CostPBS&J Non-Labor Cost (x~ISCO Sampler Rental/Shipping $120/day

(2) Sample Analysis:

Metals, Floride, and CyanideWastewater Samples @ $275/outfall

$2,671$290$60O

$550

(3) Project Management, Data Interpretation and Report Preparation

PBS&J Labor Cost: 10 hrs @ $112/hrCopying/Shipping

TOTAL

o) Non-labor cost includes vehicle mileage and field supplies

$1,120

$5,281

T 49470

TJFA 209PAGE 050

GROUND WATER MONITORING RESULTSFOR THE APPLIED MATERIALS

HARRIS BRANCH FACILITYJULY 2002

T 49471

TJFA 209PAGE 051


Document No. 020316PBS&J Job No. 440428.03

GROUND WATER MONITORING RESULTS

FOR TI-IE APPLIED MATERIALSHARRIS BRANCH FACILITY

JULY 2002

Prepared for:Applied Materials, Inc.

9700U.S. Highway 290 EastP.O. Box 149146

Austin, Texas 78714-9146

Prepared by:PBS&J

206 Wild Basin RoadAustin, Texas 78746

October 2002

Printed on Recycled Paper

206 Wild Basin Road, Suite 300 ¯ Austin, Texas 78746 ¯ Telephone: 512.327.6840 * Fax: 512.327.2453 ¯ www.pbsj.com,

TJFA 209PAGE 052

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Section

1.02.03.04.0

INTRODUCTION

GROUND WATER SAMPLING

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

CONCLUSIONS AND RECCOMENDATIONS

1

3

57

ATTACHMENT I

ATTACHMENT IIATTACHMENT III

- Ground Water Elevations and Field Parameters- Summary of Analytical Results- Analytical Laboratory Report

ii

TJFA 209PAGE 053

LIST OF FIGURES

1-1 Monitoring Well Locations 2

Table

2-1

LIST OF TABLES

List of Analytical Parameters for Ground Water Samples

iii

TJFA 209PAGE 054

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This report presents results of the ground water monitoring event conducted at the AppliedMaterials, Inc., (AMAT) Harris Branch Facility on 30-31 July 2002. The ground water monitoring event wasthe eighteenth performed at the facility since the installation of three monitoring wells (MW-I, MW-2, andMW-3) in August 1990. Two of these monitoring wells (MW-1 and MW-3) were destroyed duringconstruction activities associated with the Phase I facility. Wells MW-1A and MW-3A were installed toreplace these wells in August 1993. Due to expansion of the AMAT Harris Branch Facility, three additionalmonitoring wells were installed in December 1995. Well MW-4 was drilled east of Giles Road and northwestof Building 30. MW-5 was completed at the southwest corner of the site. MW-6 was drilled in thesoutheastern portion of the facility, south of Lower Bluebonnet Lake. In 2002, during recent construction ofBuilding 34, the surface completion of monitoring well MW-2 was modif7 from an above grade well stick upwith surrounding concrete pad to a below grade completion with manhole. This modification was required dueto the construction of a new parking lot and road in the area of MW-2.

Two additional monitoring wells were installed at the AMAT, Harris Branch Facility in July1999. The wells were installed to monitor ground water quality associated with two tracts of land purchased byAMAT. These tracts are located adjacent to the AMAT Harris Branch Facility, in the southwest comer of thesite. One tract was the location of a former Diamond Shamrock gasoline station. The underground storagetanks (LISTs) have been removed and the site has been closed in accordance with the Texas Commission onEnvironmental Quality (TCEQ), formerly the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC),rules regulating USTs. The other tract was owned by Leif Johnson Ford and was the location of a former

automobile body repair shop. A portion of this tract, where surface soils were impacted from site operations,was closed in accordance with the TCEQ’s Voluntary Cleanup Program. Monitoring well MW-7 was installedeast of the former location of the USTs and MW-8 was installed east of the area of surface soil remediation.

The ground water monitoring network at the AMAT Harris Branch Facility now consists of atotal of eight monitoring wells (Figure 1-1). Three wells (MW-1A, MW-3A, and MW-4) are locatedhydrologically upgradient of the AMAT Facility and downgradient of municipal landfill sites located to thenorth. These monitoring wells serve to monitor changes in ground water quality associated with landfillactivities. Monitoring wells MW-5, MW-7, and MW-8 are also upgradient of the AMAT Facility anddowngradient of the landfills. MW-8 is also downgradient of the former Diamond Shamrock gasoline station,and MW-5 and MW-7 are downgradient of both the gasoline station and the Leif Johnson Ford automobilebody shop. Monitoring wells MW-2 and MW-6 are located southeast of the AMAT Facility and serve tomonitor on-site ground water quality.

4404281020316

TJFA 209PAGE 055

a

TJFA 209PAGE 056

2.0 GROUND WATER SAMPLING

Ground water sampling activities included measuring depth to ground water, purging wells ofstagnant water, collection of ground water samples, and measurement of field water quality parameters. Depthto static water level was measured at each well from a reference point at the top of the well casing and readingswere recorded to the nearest one hundredth foot utilizing an electronic water-level indicator. Attachment Ipresents the results of water level monitoring and field measurement activities. No water was observed inmonitoring well MW-6 at the time of sampling. The well was screened over a depth interval from 15 to35 feet (fi). Based on water level data from the other on-site wells, the screen interval should intercept thesaturated zone beneath the facility. Because the subsurface soils consist predominantly of low permeabilitysilty clay and clay, ground water occurrence is presumably a function of fracture permeability within the claystrata. The lack of ground water in monitoring well MW-6 may be due to the absence of fractures at thislocation.

Well depth, diameter, and water level data were used to calculate the volume of water in eachwell casing. At least three well volumes of water were purged from each well prior to sampling using a

dedicated, clean, disposable hand bailer. In the event that a well purged dry, the well was allowed to recover

prior to sampling. The ground water samples were then collected using the hand bailer and transferred directly

to the laboratory provided containers with appropriate preservatives. Aider collection, the samples were placedsecurely on ice in a cooler and transported directly to the laboratory. Chain of custody records were maintained

for all samples.

The ground water samples were analyzed for the suite of analytical parameters presented inTable 2-1. Identified on the table are the EPA and TCEQ-approved analytical methods used to perform theanalyses. These parameters include total organic carbon (TOC), total organic halogens (TOX), total dissolvedsolids (TDS), arsenic, barium, cadmium, calcium, chromium, iron, lead, magnesium, manganese, mercury,potassium, selenium, sodium, zinc, alkalinity, chloride, nitrate/nitrite, and sulfate. In addition, samplescollected during the July 2002 sampling event were analyzed for an extensive suite of volatile and semivolatileorganic compounds (see list of analytes on laboratory reports presented in Attachment III). AnalySys, Inc.,Austin, Texas performed the chemical analyses.

440428/020316

T 49477

TJFA 209PAGE 057

TABLE 2-1LIST OF ANALYTICAL PARAMETER FOR GROUND WATER SAMPLES

APPLIED MATERIALS, HARRIS BRACH CAMPUS, AUSTIN, TEXAS

Parameter Analytical Method

Volatile Organic Compounds o) 8260B

Semivolatile Organic Compounds 0) 8270C

Total Organic Carbon (TOC) 9060

Total Organic Halides (TOX) 9020A

Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) 160.1

Arsenic 7060

Barium 6010

Cadmium 6010

Chromium 6010

Iron 6010

Lead 7421

Manganese 6010

Mercury 7470

Selenium 7740

Zinc 6010

Alkalinity, total 310.1

Calcium 6010

Chloride 9251

Magnesium 6010

Nitrate/Nitrite-N 353.1

Potassium 7610

Sodium 6010

Sulfate 9038

See Attachment I1-I for a complete list of VOC and SVOC constituents.

4404281020316 4

T 49478

TJFA 209PAGE 058

3.0 ANALYTICAL RESULTS

A summary of the analytical results for the July 2002 sampling event is presented in

Attachment BA, and the results are described below. Included in Attachment ILA are summaries of theanalytical results from past sampling events for wells MW-1/MW-IA, MW-2, and MW-3/MW-3A (August

and November 1990; April and August 1991; April 1993; May and November 1994; June and December

1995; June 1996; January and December 1997; June and December 1998; July and December 1999; July 2000;

January and August 2001; and January 2002), MW-4 and MW-5 (December 1995; June 1996; January and

December 1997; June and December 1998; July and December 1999; July 2000; January and August 2001;and January 2002), and MW-7 and MW-8 (July and December 1999; July 2000; January and August 2001;

and January 2002). Monitoring well MW- 1 was destroyed prior to the August 1991 event and well MW-3 was

destroyed sometime after the August 1991 sampling event. Because of the lack of ground water in monitoringwell MW-6, samples have not been collected from the well. The analytical report prepared by AnalySys, Inc.

for the July 2002 sampling event is presented in Attachment Ill.

The analytical results for the metals and inorganic parameters for ground water samplescollected in July 2002 do not reflect any major abnormalities from previously collected samples at the site. As acheck on the accuracy of the analytical data for metals and inorganic constituents, ionic balancing of majorcations and anions was performed (Attachment I[B). The difference between the sum of major anions andcations for all samples ranges from 1% to 8% of the total major ions. The Texas Department of Health (TDH)and the TCEQ generally considers ionic balancing ratios of 10% or less as acceptable.

A review of the analytical data for the metals arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, lead,mercury, and selenium indicate that all detected levels were below drinking water standards (i.e., Maximum

Contaminant Levels - MCLs) established under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). Sulfate levels ranged

from 2,470 mg/l in well MW-3A to 3,210 mg/l in the well MW-8. Chloride concentrations ranged from 2,540

mg/l in MW-1A to 3,830 mg/l in MW-8. Although these levels are relatively high, the similarity between thevalues detected in all monitoring wells over time indicate that these values are likely representative of the

natural ground water beneath the site. Calcium, iron, magnesium, manganese, potassium, sodium, zinc, total

dissolved solids, alkalinity, and nitrate/nitrite levels generally showed only slight variations over previously

recorded levels at the site.

In addition to the metals and inorganic parameters discussed above, TOX, TOC, and volatileorganic compound (VOC) and semivolatile organic compound (SVOC) analyses were performed on theground water samples. The laboratory’s target compound list for volatile and semivolatile organic analysesincluded a comprehensive suite of 52 VOCs and 90 SVOCs, which are common hazardous organicconstituents identified by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). The volatile andsemivolatile organic analyses were performed to provide detailed information on the potential presence oforganic constituents in the ground water beneath the AMI facility, and provide direct correlation between

4404281020316

T 49479

TJFA 209PAGE 059

VOC/SVOC and the indicator parameters TOC/TOX, which are routinely analyzed during ground watermonitoring at the site.

None of the VOCs or SVOCs included on the laboratory’s target compound list were detectedin the ground water samples. TOX was also not detected. TOC was detected in all monitoring wells atconcentrations of 2.53 rag/1 in MW-4 to 15.2 mg/I in MW-2. Relatively high levels of TOC were detected insamples from wells MW- 1 A, MW-2, MW-5, and MW-8. The analytical laboratory was contacted to verify theTOC results. Upon review, the laboratory indicated that several unidentified peaks (i.e., not included on thelaboratory’s target compound list) were present in the semivolatile range for these samples. To provideadditional data, the laboratory was requested to perform a "top ten" search for semivolatile compounds forsamples collected from MW-1A, MW-2, and MW-5. Basically, this represented the identification of the 10highest gas chromatogram (GC) peaks (if ten were present) for semivolatile compounds not contained on thelaboratory target compound list. The peaks were identified using computerized searches era library containingmass spectra. When the mass spectra matched to a certain degree, the compound was named; however, theassigned identity was in most cases highly uncertain. These compounds are routinely called tentativelyidentified compounds (TICs). The concentrations of TICs are highly uncertain and could be orders ofmagnitude higher or lower than the actual concentration.

The result of the search is summarized in Attachment IIC. Several TICs were identified in thesamples. These compounds are not regulated by USEPA or TCEQ and very little information is available

regarding the source of these chemicals, their chemical and physical properties, and the chemical’s

environmental fate and transport. Of the TICs identified, relevant information was found for only caprolactam,which is primarily used in the manufacturing of synthetic fibers (especially nylon).

4404281020316

T 49480

TJFA 209PAGE 060

4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Ground water samples were collected in July 2002 from the ground water monitoring wellnetwork at the AMAT, Harris Brach facility. Samples were analyzed for a suite of inorganic and organicanalytical parameters presented previously in Table 2-1. Analytical results for metals and inorganic parametersdid not reflect any major abnormalities from previously collected samples at the site.

Relatively high levels of TOC were detected in samples from wells MW-1A, MW-2, MW-5,and MW-8, however, no VOCs or SVOCs included on the laboratory’s target compound list were detected. A"top ten" library search for SVOCs identified several TICs which may be present in the samples. The identityand reported concentration of these TICs are highly uncertain.

The detection of these TICs can be a function of three possible scenarios. First, thesecompounds, or other organic constituents, are in deed present in the ground water at these locations. Secondly,the organics tentatively identified are a relict of laboratory cross-contamination of the samples during handlingand preparation. Thirdly, the organics could potentially have been introduced to the samples during fieldcollection activities. To investigate the presents of the TICs, PBS&J recommends the following:

Conduct a review of TCEQ files for the Waste Management Inc. (WMI) AustinCommunity Landfill and the BFI Sunset Farms Landfill. The objective of the review isto obtain information on the ground water quality beneath the landfill sites and toevaluate the data in the context of the ongoing ground water monitoring program atAMAT Harris Branch Campus. These data will aid in the evaluation of the analyticaldata from the July 2002.

Collect ground water samples from wells MW-1A, MW-2, and MW-5 to confirm theresults from the July 2002 sampling event. A blank sample consisting of purified waterwill also be submitted as a check on laboratory and field sampling cross-contamination.The blank sample will be handled exactly like the ground water samples. Samples willbe submitted for TOC and SVOC "top ten" analyzes. The objective of the resampling isto confirm the presents of SVOCs in the ground water.

4404281020316

T 49481

TJFA 209PAGE 061

ATTACHMENT I

GROUND WATER ELEVATION AND FIELD PARAMETERS

T 49482

TJFA 209PAGE 062

.<

T 49483

TJFA 209PAGE 063

ATTACHMENT II

SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS

T 49484

TJFA 209PAGE 064

,IIII II ’..... il

T 49485

TJFA 209PAGE 065

T 49486

TJFA 209PAGE 066

T 49487

TJFA 209PAGE 067

B Z

T 49488

TJFA 209PAGE 068

T 49489

TJFA 209PAGE 069

T 49490

TJFA 209PAGE 070

V 0

T 49491

TJFA 209PAGE 071

I__

T 49492

TJFA 209PAGE 072

T 49493

TJFA 209PAGE 073

T 49494

TJFA 209PAGE 074

A’i-]’ACHMENT libCATION-ANION BALANCE FOR GROUND WATER SAMPLES

Well No.

ANION (-)

CATION (÷)

MW-IAConstituent

AlkalinityChloddeNitratelNitidteSulfate

Concentration Conversion Concentrationmj]/I Factor (F1) meq/I

200 0.01639 3.27802540 0.02821 71.6534

0.449 0.019 0.00852950 0.02082 61.4190

TOTAL 136

Badum 0.0261 0.01456 0.0004Calcium 628 0.0499 31.3372Cadmium <0.005 0.01779 NDIron 0.0741 0.03581 0.0027Lead <0.001 0.00965 NDMagnesium 187 0,08229 15.3882Manganese <0.01 0.0364 NDPotassium 14.5 0.02558 0.3709Sodium 1660 0.0435 72.2100Zinc <0.01 0.03059 ND

TOTAL 119

Well No.

ANION (-)

CATION (+}

MW-3AConstituent Concentration Conversion Concentration

mgll Factor (F1) meq/I

Alkalinity 220 0.01639 3.6058Chloride 2940 0.02821 82.9374Nitrate/Nitidte 0.0551 0.019 0.0010Sulfate 2470 0.02082 51.4254

TOTAL 138

Badum 0.0151 0.01456 0.0002Calcium 980 0.0499 48.9020Cadmium <0.005 0,01779 NDIron 0.384 0.03581 0.0138Lead <0,001 0.00965 NDMagnesium 348 0.08229 28.6369Manganese 0.0783 0.0364 0.0029Potassium 15.9 0.02558 0.4067Sodium 1950 0.0435 84.8250Zinc <0.01 0.03059 ND

TOTAL 163

Well No. MW.2Constituent

ANION (-)

CATION (÷)

AlkalinityChloddeNitrate/NitiriteSulfate

Concentration ConversionFactor (F1)

Concentrationmeq/I

230 0.01639 3.76972820 0.02821 79,5522

0.232 0.019 0.00442520 0.02082 52.4664

TOTAL 138

Badum 0.0279 0.01456 0.0004Calcium 858 0,0499 42.8142Cadmium <0.005 0,01779 NDIron 3.27 0.03581 0.1171Lead <0.001 0.00965 NDMagnesium 236 0.08229 19.4204Manganese 0.113 0.0364 NDPotassium 12.1 0.02558 0.3095Sodium 1770 0.0435 76.9950Zinc 0.0239 0.03059 0.0007

TOTAL 140

Well No.

ANION (-)

M~N..4Constituent Concentration Conversion Concentration

mgll Factor (F1) meqll

Alkalinity 210 0.01639 3.4418Chloride 3480 0,02821 98.1708Nitrate/Nitidte 0.0421 0.019 0.0008Sulfate 2690 0.02082 56.0058

TOTAL 158CATION (+)

Barium 0,0128 0.01456 0,000:Calcium 574 0.0499 28.6421Cadmium <0.005 0,01779 N[Iron 0,238 0.03581 0.0085’Lead <0.001 0.00965 NDiMagnesium 256 0.08229 21,0662Manganese 0.0774 0.0364 0.0028Potassium 10.4 0.02558 0.2668Sodium 2170 0.6435 94.395(~Zinc <0.01 0.03059 ND

TOTAL 144

440428/0203 ! 6T 49495

TJFA 209PAGE 075

ATTACHMENT libCATION-ANION BALANCE FOR GROUND WATER SAMPLES

Well No.

ANION (-)

CATION (+)

I~N-SConstituent

AlkalinityChlorideNitrate/NitiriteSulfate

Concentration Convemion Concentrationmg/I Factor (F1) meq/I

250 0.01639 4.09753670 0.02821 103.53070.12 0.019 0.0023

3050 0.02082 63.5010TOTAL 171

Badum 0.0131 0.01456 0.0002Calcium 856 0.0499 42.7144Cadmium <0.005 0.01779 NDIron 0.199 0.03581 0.0071Lead <0.001 0.00965 NDMagnesium 333 0.08229 27.4026Manganese 0,0354 0.0364 NDPotassium 17.7 0.02558 0.4528Sodium 2550 0.0435 110.9250Zinc <0.01 0.03059 ND

TOTAL 182

Well No.

ANION (-)

CATION (+)

MW-8Constituent

AlkalinityChloddeNitratelNitidteSulfate

Concentration Conversion Concentrationmg/I Factor (FI) meq/l

240 0.01639 3.93363830 0.02821 108.0443

0.143 0.019 0.00273210 0.02082 66.8322

TOTAL 179

Badum 0.0254 0,01456Calcium 929 0.0499Cadmium <0,005 0.01779Iron 2.36 0.03581Lead <0.001 0,00965Magnesium 338 0.08229Manganese 0.0757 0.0364Potassium 19.4 0.02558Sodium 2510 0.0435Zinc 0.018 0.03059

TOTAL

0.000446.3571

ND0.0845

ND27.81400.00280.4963

109.18500.0006

184

Well No. I~N-7Constituent

ANION (-)

CATION (+)

Concentration Conversion Concentratio~m~l/I Factor (F1) meq/~

Alkalinity 270 0.01639 4.4253Chlodde 3220 0.02821 90.8362Nitrate/Nitidte 0.0681 0.019 0.0013Sulfate 3170 0.02082 65.9994

TOTAL 161

Badum 0.0138 0.01456 0.0002Caldum 880 0.0499 43.9120Cadmium <0.005 0.01779 NDIron 0.319 0.03581 0.0114Lead <0.001 0.00965 NDMagnesium 333 0.08229 27.4026Manganese 0.0798 0.0364 0.0029Potassium 17.7 0.02558 0.4528Sodium 2460 0.0435 107.0100Zinc 0.0136 0.03059 0.0004

TOTAL 179

440428/020316T 49496

TJFA 209PAGE 076

ATrA~NT IIcTENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COUMPOU’NDS

3ULY 2002 GROUND WATER MONITORING EVENT

Parameter (rag/l) CAS No.Monitoring Well

MW-1A MW-2 MW-5

N-Butyl-2-buten- 1-amine4,4’-Butylidenebis-2-(1, I dimethylethyl)-5-mCaprolactam2, 5 -Dihydro-2,5 -dimethoxyfuran3,4-Dihydroxy-3-cyclobutene- 1,2-dione3,3 -Dimethyl- 1-butene

6233%87-585-60-9105-60-2332-77-42892-51-5558-37-2

ND0.023NDNDNDND

0.216 NDND ND6.93 2.07

0.556 ND0.106 ND2.70 NDND 0.305ND 0.317

0.630 ND1.59 ND

0.152 ND0.940 ND

1,6-Dimethyl-3-piperidino2-Methyb3-butene-2-ol5-Methyl-2(SH)-thiophenone10-Nonadecanone3-Nitro- 1H-I,2,4-triazoleOctanethioic acidUnknown Amine

54751-70-1115-18-4

7210-64-2504-57-4

24807-55-42432-85-1

NDNDNDNDNDND0A4

ND -- Not Detected

4404281020316

T 49497

TJFA 209PAGE 077

ATTACHMENT

ANALYTICAL LABORATORY REPORT

T 49498

TJFA 209PAGE 078

II

!::i

TJFA 209PAGE 079

v vv~~°vv~vv

T 49500

TJFA 209PAGE 080

l,l’id

T 49501

TJFA 209PAGE 081

I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IIIIIIIIII IIIiiiI I|IIIiIiiiiiii

I

V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V

v v ~ v v v v V v v v v v v v v v v v ~ v v v v v v v v v v v v

T 49502

TJFA 209PAGE 082



T 49503

TJFA 209PAGE 083

V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V

v~Vv vvv vvv~vv

T 49504

TJFA 209PAGE 084

T 49505

TJFA 209PAGE 085

T 49506

TJFA 209PAGE 086

TJFA 209PAGE 087

T 49508

TJFA 209PAGE 088

= ,

IIIIIIIIIIIl~IIIIIIIIII I!lllllIII|IIIIIIIII I|IIIIIilI I IIIl|I

v v v~ v~~~~ v v v VVVVVVVVV

I$1d

T 49509

TJFA 209PAGE 089



T 49510

TJFA 209PAGE 090

IIIIIIlllllllll;llllll I|1111I

V V V V V.V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V

vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv999~9999

T 49511

TJFA 209PAGE 091



T49512

TJFA 209PAGE 092

0

T49513

TJFA 209PAGE 093

I I II I II I II I II

I I II I II I II I II I I

IIII

I

IIII

I

I

TJFA 209PAGE 094

lrld

TJFA 209PAGE 095

Lrld

b -- oo

~ ~ o o~ ooo oo- ~- ~ ~

T 49516

TJFA 209PAGE 096

VVVVVVVVV

T49517

TJFA 209PAGE 097


vvvvvvvvvv~vvvvg~v~vvvvvvv~vvvvv

T 49518

TJFA 209PAGE 098

ElL/

oo

V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V


TJFA 209PAGE 099

I$1d



T 49520

TJFA 209PAGE 100

T 49521

TJFA 209PAGE 101

T 49522

¢¢¢

TJFA 209PAGE 102

I

I

I

TJFA 209PAGE 103

T 49524

q

TJFA 209PAGE 104

IJ’Id

I I I I I I I I I I ~ I ~ I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I I IIIIIIIIIII I IIIIIIIIi

iiiiiiiiI

v v v v v v V V V v v V

v v VVVVVVVVV

T 49525

TJFA 209PAGE 105

I!Id

v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v ~


T 49526

TJFA 209PAGE 106



TJFA 209PAGE 107

~ V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V

oo oooooo oov v~ v~vvv~ vv~

T 49528

TJFA 209PAGE 108

T 49529

TJFA 209PAGE 109

T 49530

TJFA 209PAGE 110

TJFA 209PAG E 111

oo

T 49532

TJFA 209PAGE 112

T 49533

TJFA 209PAGE 113



T 49534

TJFA 209PAGE 114

v~vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv

V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V

TJFA 209PAG E 115



T 49536

TJFA 209PAGE 116

T 49537

TJFA 209PAGE 117

T 49538

TJFA 209PAGE 118

TJFA 209PAGE 119

EILJ

~ ~ "~ v v v v v v’9 v v

T 49540

TJFA 209PAGE 120

I

~ v V ~ V v v v v V v v v V V V V V V V V ~ ~, ,~ i -- .......~ " " " V V V V V V V V V

I ~ " ~ " V V V V V V V V V

VVVVVVVVV

v~~~~~ v v v v v

T 49541

TJFA 209PAGE 121

F

I$1d

vvv v v v v v vv v vv v v v vv v v vv vv v vvv vv~


T 49542

TJFA 209PAGE 122

vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv~


TJFA 209PAGE 123



T 49544

TJFA 209PAGE 124

r

T 49545

TJFA 209PAGE 125

TJFA 209PAGE 126

TJFA 209PAGE 127

T 49548

TJFA 209PAGE 128

oo

IIIIIIiI

v v V

T 49549

TJFA 209PAGE 129

~v~,v~vvv ~,v ~ vvv ~vvvv~,v~,v~ vv

T 49550

TJFA 209PAGE 130

V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V

V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V

TJFA 209PAGE 131

V V V V V V V V V V V V V

T 49552

TJFA 209PAGE 132

I

T49553

TJFA 209PAGE 133

T 49554

TJFA 209PAGE 134

TJFA 209PAGE 135

I$1d

oo

v v v

vvv

TJFA 209PAGE 136

T 49557

TJFA 209PAGE 137

TJFA 209PAGE 138

r

r

t

T 49559

TJFA 209PAGE 139

.

Lrld

zzzzzzzz

T 49560

TJFA 209PAG E 140

t

T 49561

TJFA 209PAGE 141

TJFA 209PAG E 142

~.0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0~0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

-g

-0

0

T 49563

TJFA 209PAG E 143

-0

J

~ 0 o o 0 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o~" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

~ o~ o o o o o ~o o o o o o ~o o° ~° o° ~o

T 49564

TJFA 209PAG E 144

.t

J0

"o

6 o o o o o o o o o o o

T 49565

TJFA 209PAG E 145

-o_o

_0

-0

0

00

0

00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

T 49566

TJFA 209PAG E 146

_0

T 49567

TJFA 209PAG E 147

WRITTEN QUESTIONS TO BE PROPOUNDED TO THE · WRITTEN QUESTIONS TO BE PROPOUNDED TO THE CUSTODIAN OF...

Documents

Transcript of WRITTEN QUESTIONS TO BE PROPOUNDED TO THE · WRITTEN QUESTIONS TO BE PROPOUNDED TO THE CUSTODIAN OF...