WQCD Response: Selenium/Misc. 1. Reverse Osmosis Treatment Colorado currently has 42 RO treatment...
-
Upload
roderick-hart -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
2
description
Transcript of WQCD Response: Selenium/Misc. 1. Reverse Osmosis Treatment Colorado currently has 42 RO treatment...
WQCD Response:Selenium/Misc.
1
Reverse Osmosis Treatment• Colorado currently has
42 RO treatment plants. Attractive for communities with lower source water quality
• RO can concentrate ambient pollutants 4-6x in waste brine
• If source water pollutants are elevated and the plant is located on low-dilution stream, RO brine is at risk of compliance problems
Cottonwood Proposal• RO facility not discharging
since 2011• Unable to consistently
meet effluent limits from beginning of operations.
• Currently operating as a micro-filtration plant with effluent piped to ACCWA WWTF
• UAA characterized the biological and chemical conditions in 3 adjacent creeks in support of ambient Se standards
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
5/2/10 6/21/10 8/10/10 9/29/10 11/18/10 1/7/11 2/26/11 4/17/11 6/6/11
Sele
nium
ug/
L
Cottonwood ROTP Effluent Selenium Concentrations
Chronic Std
Acute Std
Summary Cottonwood UAA• Upper reaches of Cottonwood, Lone Tree and Windmill
Creeks drain selenium bearing shales. No evidence of point sources
• Chemistry: Sampling over 17 months with generally good spatial coverage. (given the challenges of flow)
• Biology: MMI scores and fish community composition generally indicative of urbanized, flow limited systems.
Aquatic biota (fish and bugs) have elevated tissue concentrations ranging from 10-24ug/g at most sites.
3 of 1700 fish found with Se related deformities.
• Highest Attainable Use= Elevated Se in tissues with a low rate of fish deformities.
Underlying Geology
Ambient Se TVS
LEGEND
Cottonwood 4b StandardsAmbient based standards for the upper portions of
these systems and TVS* in lower
Summer and Winter standards (due to 2x greater winter concentrations)
Assessment locations capture the spatial variability well
The Division recommends the proposal as stated in WQCD Exhibits 38-26 and 27
Milliken Overview• History of compliance violations due to selenium
• DMR delinquency etc
• New personnel and technical consulting evaluating new treatment technologies and source water
• Proposal seeking continuation of the Se temporary modification on Little Thompson River.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
4019
85
1990
1995
2000
2005
2010
2015
Se (u
g/l)
Little Thompson Selenium Concentrations (1987-2014)
Site 124 Selenium
85th percentile
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Sele
nium
ug/
L
Month
Town of Milliken ROTP Effluent Selenium Concentrations
2012
2013
2014
Chronic Std
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2006
2008
2009
2010
2012
2013
2014
2016
Milliken ROTP Effluent Se Concentrations
2007
2008
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
Linear (All)
Temporary ModificationThe Division withdrew our initial proposal for a “current
conditions” temporary modification due to several concerns about Milliken’s facility.
• “Current Conditions” equals no discharge in this case.
• Uncertainty about the consistent and worsening trend in effluent quality.
• A numeric temporary modification does not build in assimilative capacity.
Other ProposalsClear Creek Segment 2c: The Division supports
CCCSD’s proposal for new and revised temporary modifications.
Big Dry Creek Segment 1: The Division supports BDCWA’s proposal to move one of the assessment locations and correct typos.
Regulation 38.7: The Division supports the inclusion of language specifying that Marston Forebay is not Waters of the State.
Questions?
Se (ppm)
USGS National Geochemical Map for selenium.Map was compiled by Andrew Grosz and Jeffrey Grossman, 2006.