World System Theory & Burma

32
HOW DOES WORLD SYSTEM THEORY EXPLAIN NEWLY INDUSTRIALIZING COUNTRIES? Myo Thein 31 October 2012

description

How does world system theory explains newly industrializing countries?

Transcript of World System Theory & Burma

Page 1: World System Theory & Burma

HOW DOES WORLD SYSTEM THEORY EXPLAIN NEWLY

INDUSTRIALIZING COUNTRIES?

Myo Thein

31 October 2012

Page 2: World System Theory & Burma

WORLD-SYSTEMS THEORY Also known as world-systems analysis. Multidisciplinary approach to world

history and social change. World-systems analysis stresses that the

world-system should be the primary unit of social analysis.

World-system refers to the international division of labour, class distinctions & global capitalism all of which divide the world into core countries, semi-periphery countries and the periphery countries.

Page 3: World System Theory & Burma

WORLD-SYSTEMS THEORYCore countries focus on higher skill, capital-intensive

production, technology, researchSemi-periphery & Periphery

Countries focuses on low-skill, labour-intensive

production, agriculture production, providing cheap labour and extraction of raw materials which constantly reinforces the dominance of the core countries

Page 4: World System Theory & Burma

WORLD-SYSTEMS THEORY Throughout last few centuries the

world system has extended geographically and intensified economically, some countries become the world hegemon (leader state) ; this status has passed from Dutch to UK to USA.

The system is dynamic, and individual states can gain or lose the core status over time.

Page 5: World System Theory & Burma

WALLERSTEIN’S WORLD-SYSTEMS ANALYSIS The rise of the world system traces from the 15th

century when European feudal economy suffered a crisis and was transformed into a capitalist one.

The West utilized its advantages and gained control over most of the world economy, presiding over the development and spread of industrialization and capitalist economy, indirectly resulting in unequal development.

Seeing the development of the capitalist world-economy as detrimental to a large proportion of the world's population.

Viewing the period since the 1970s as an "age of transition," one that will give way to a future world-system (or world-systems) whose configuration cannot be determined in advance.

Page 6: World System Theory & Burma

FEUDAL KNIGHT & IMPERIALIST NAPOLEON

Page 7: World System Theory & Burma

WORLD-SYSTEMS ANALYSIS Arguing that there have been thus far

only two varieties of world-systems: world-economies and world empires.

A world-empire are large bureaucratic structures with a single political centre and an axial division of labour, but multiple cultures. (E.g. Chinese empire)

A world-economy is a large axial division of labour with multiple political centres and multiple cultures.

Page 8: World System Theory & Burma

CHINESE WORLD EMPIRE

Page 9: World System Theory & Burma

CORE COMPETITION Throughout the history of the modern world-system there has

been a group of core nations competing with one another for access to the world's resources, economic dominance, and hegemony over periphery nations.

A core nation is dominant in three forms of economic dominance over a period of time:

1. Productivity dominance allows a country to produce products of greater quality at a cheaper price compared to other countries.

2. Productivity dominance may lead to trade dominance. Now, there is a favourable balance of trade for the dominant nation since more countries are buying the products of the dominant country than it is buying from them.

3. Trade dominance may lead to financial dominance. Now, more money is coming into the country than going out. Bankers of the dominant nation tend to receive more control of the world's financial resources.

Military dominance is also likely after a nation reaches these three rankings.

Page 10: World System Theory & Burma

WORLD-SYSTEMS THEORY

Core

Semi-periphery

Periphery

Page 11: World System Theory & Burma

WORLD-SYSTEMS THEORY World-systems theory was influenced by

dependency theory (a neo-Marxist) explanation of development processes.

World-systems theory emerged in the 1970s aiming to replace modernization theory.

Wallerstein criticized modernization theory due to:

1. its focus on the state as the only unit of analysis,

2. its assumption there is only a single path of evolutionary development for all countries,

3. its disregard of transnational structures that constrain local and national development.

Page 12: World System Theory & Burma

DEPENDENCY THEORY ANALYSIS Existing in the wider global system. Serve economics interest of core

countries. Three characteristics of dependency

theory:(1) international division of labour, (2) class distinction between rich and

poor,(3) global capitalism

Page 13: World System Theory & Burma

INTERNATIONAL DIVISION OF LABOUR There are International Division of

Labour between CC, PC, CP and PP. CC dominate due to industry,

technology, research and capital intensive industry.

Especially PP countries depend on resource extraction, agriculture production and providing cheap labour.

Page 14: World System Theory & Burma

AS THE RESULT OF INTERNATIONAL DIVISION OF LABOUR PC serves the economic interest of CC. CP serves both the economic interest of

CC & PC. PP serves all the economic interest of

CC, PC & CP.

Page 15: World System Theory & Burma

DISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH

Feudalism middle age in Europe. Plutocracy today.

Rich, Nobel & Church represent 10%of population and

represent 83% of wealth.

Peasants and workers represent 90% population

and share the 17% of wealth.

Super rich represent 1% of population and

control 43% of wealth.

World 99% population share 57% of the wealth.

Page 16: World System Theory & Burma

CLASS DISTINCTION Each states (CC, PC, CP & PP) got clear

divide between rich and poor (masses). Rich people (political and economic

elite) all cooperate with another in order to maintain the system the way it is.

These elites collaborate each other to ensure they stay in power and to increase their own wealth.

Page 17: World System Theory & Burma

WIDER GLOBAL SYSTEM It is global capitalism. Liberal economic theories dominate. Theories of trade and finance dominate. All serve interest of CC. MNCs & Banks are instruments of rich

people in the CC. International institutions such as WB

and IMF all serve the interest of richest people in CC.

Media and Education also serve the interest of CC.

Page 18: World System Theory & Burma

AS THE RESULT OF WIDER GLOBAL SYSTEM The entire system (1) international

division of labour, (2) class distinction between rich and poor, and (3) global capitalism all serve the interest of richest people of CC.

They don’t serve interest of developing countries.

They don’t promote development and equal opportunities.

They system promote dominance and exploitation.

Page 19: World System Theory & Burma

UNDERDEVELOPMENT From Dependence Theory perspective

how can state possibly develop under such kind of international system?

The system designed to prevent them from developing.

The system promote underdevelopment.

Page 20: World System Theory & Burma

FUTURE………. What will happen in next 40 years? Will there be the third World War? Will religion relevant in modern science

and technology? Will people colonize Mars, Venus or the

other planets? Are there any human being in an

another planet? Are there aliens in our galaxy? Will world-systems theory still relevant

in next 50 years?

Page 21: World System Theory & Burma

OUR LADY

Page 22: World System Theory & Burma

LADY & GENTLEMEN

Page 23: World System Theory & Burma

BURMA & UNCLE SAM

Page 24: World System Theory & Burma

WORLD LEADERS

Page 25: World System Theory & Burma

PRESIDENT OBAMA GREETING DAW AUNG SAN SUU KYI AT HER RESIDENCE IN BURMA 2012

Page 26: World System Theory & Burma

DAW AUNG SAN SUU KYI RECEIVING PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA AT HER LAKESIDE VILLA IN BURMA 2012

Page 27: World System Theory & Burma

COLONIZATION OF MARS?

Page 28: World System Theory & Burma

OUR NEXT STOP 2052!

Page 29: World System Theory & Burma

FUTURE………. What will happen in next 40 years? Will there be the third World War? Will religion relevant in modern science

and technology? Will people colonize Mars, Venus or the

other planets? Are there any human being in an

another planet? Are there aliens in our galaxy? Will world-systems theory still relevant

in next 50 years?

Page 30: World System Theory & Burma

WHAT SHALL WE SAY!

Page 31: World System Theory & Burma

EVERYTHING IS IMPERMANENT IN

THE WORLD AND WHO KNOWS WHAT

WILL HAPPEN NEXT!

Thanks. May you be happy and healthy!

Page 32: World System Theory & Burma

REFERENCES Wallerstein, I. , 1976, The Modern World-System I:

Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. New York: Academic Press.

Fordham University, 1997, Modern History Sourcebook: Summary of Wallerstein on World System Theory. Retrieved10 October 2012 from http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/Wallerstein.asp

allensens, 27 February 2012, Dr Allen Sens: Dependency Theory. Retrieved 10 October 2012 from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JN6LlMY2ApQ

GlobalRegents9, 30 December 2010, Global History and Geography 9: Distribution of Wealth”. Retrieved 10 October 2012 from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eful-Rm2JO4